Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
026-1165-11-000
Wisconsin Department cfCommerce PRIVATE SEWAGE SYSTEM County: S Cr oix Safety and Building Division Sanitary Permit No: .�I� INSPECTION REPORT 463004 0 GENERAL AI ORMATION (ATTACH TO PERMIT) State Plan ID No: Personal information you provide may be used for secondary purposes [Privacy Law, s.15.04 (1)(m)]. Permit Holder's Name: City Village X Township Parcel Tax No: Dalstock LLC I Richmond Townshi CST BM Elev: ( insp. BM Elev: BM Description: J' SectionlTown /Range/Map No: ao. ro • o Csr g � 22.30.18. TANK INFORMATION ELEVATION DATA TYPE MANUFACTURER CAPACITY STATION BS HI FS ELEV. Septic �T Z � Benchmark Q) � � s 0 ' o(•� I � . Dosing Alt. BM Aeration Bldg. Sewer 5`CM 93. SO I q4.y° Holding St/Ht Inlet I TANK SETBACK INFORMATION StlHt Outlet �•�•��� TANK TO P/L WELL BLDG. Vent to Air Intake ROAD Dt Inlet Septic Dt Bottom Dosing Header /Man. a Q Aeration Dist. Pipe Holding Bot. System Final Grade 1 PUMP /SIPHON INFORMATION Manufacturer Deman St Cover Z.c 0"'. A GPM �{ M l N odeu er TDH Lift riction Loss System Head TDH Ft 3&6 94.4 F cemain Length Dist. to Well 1.30 �� 1 SOIL ABSORPTION SYSTEM RENC Width Length No. Trenches PIT DIMENSIONS No. Of Pits Inside Dia. Liquid Depth DIM 3 �V . Zs SETBACK SYSTEM TO P/L BLDG WELL LAKE /STREAM LEACHING Ma acturer: INFORMATION CHAMBER OR '�'�u$E� , Type Of System:` .�. f �i f /` ^^ UNIT Model Number: • Q to DISTRIBUTION SYSTEM Header /Manifold Dist � �x e Size J xHole Spacing Vent to Air Intake Pip Length Dia LenDia Spacing SOIL COVER x Pressure Systems Only xx Mound Or At -Grade Systems Only Depth Over Depth Over xx Depth of xx Seeded /Sodded xx Mulched Bed/Trench Center Bed/Trench Edges Topsoil 0 Yes No [] Yes No 32 M K I N �Inclu a code crepencies, persons present, etc.) Inspection #1. - W r. �� +��� Inspection #2: / s // Location: 1444 129th Street New Richmond, WI 54017 (N 1/2 S� 1/4� 2�T30n R18W) Lundy ( �eadoyys Lot 11 . Parpel [yp 2, 2.�Q.18 . � 1►„ 1.) Alt BM Description= 5Tvno.,64 es�,v- / �1 Q \ c-( 1�y.. Y4� 1 �,�q 2.) Bldg sewer length = 2g J mount of cover = a _ a+� � U� 9 rte; � QIle S 1C Uu*t Plan rev�is o !71�_i Required' ,_ Ye�q No �j �PTf' 13 7cm Use other side for additional information. 'C ___ •____ r ____ Date Cr pc rs Signature Cart. No. X60 c�9> >- �,��►Q I�ap �'� &C 44,4 S W' , - C .1�� 8`. �0 - 90 .x' �.sa�^ ��• Safety and Buildings Division County r 201 W. Washington Ave., P.O. Box 7162 ' J• C � — I �O��1<� Madison, WI 53707 - 7162 Sanitary Permit Number (to be filled in by Co.) (608) 266-3151 4 &3 00 De artment of Commerce Sanitary Permit Application state Pla I.D. Number In accord with Comm 83.11, Wis. Adm. Code, personal information you provide Project Address (if different than mailing addras) tray be used for secondary purposes Privacy law, st 5.04(lxm) L Application Information — Please Print All Information Property 9N shame Patoel#r Lot# Block Property Owner's Mail' Address Z S -� t . - SL A sett 2 City, State t Zip c Phone Number E�JIJ VlJ G i T N; 1E W IL Ppe of Building (check all that apply) °° IV_r S u"` Subdivision Nagm � Nutrtber A or 2 Family Dwelling - Number of Bedrooms = Public Amm ecial - Describe Use 3 j ary v 1 State Owned - Describe Use - of IIL Type 9fPwndft (Check only one boz on line A. Complete line B if applicable) A ew System Replacement System Ttestm=VHolding Talc Replacement Only other ModScatiou to Existing System List previous Permit Number and Date (saved B. Permit Renewal Permit Revision Grange of Permit Transfer to New Before Expiration Plumber Owner IV, Type of POWTS S : (Check all that appl a - pressurized tit- cuound Mound> 14 in. of suitable soil Mound < 14 in. of suitable soil At -Grade Single Pass Sand Fdta' nstmeted Weiland Pressurized In-Ground Holding Tank Peat Filter Aerobic Treatment Unit RecmrcnWrinng Sand Filter Uft Synthetic Media Filter Chamber Dri Line Gravel -Iess Pi odw V. pis reatment Area I oa Dispersal Area Proposed (sf) System Elevati7 Desr'gg How (gpd) Design Soil caho° Rax(gpdsf) DrsPr+�1� ( / , / � um Total Number tanufactu� �� Prefab Si Steel Plastic VL Tank Info Cra is of units �, (� Q A Concrete Conshuctod Now Bzisdng ( qtr Tanks Tanks Septic nr HotdingTank Z SS Aerobic T�eatmrat Unit Dosing (3arober VII. Res mrsibili Statement- I, the crud a responsibility for In R the P YS OW drown on the attached Pl ame (Print) Plutnbem' ute Business Phone Number / l T.. AY ✓� , Plumber's Address (Stroet. City, State. VIII. Gran /Department Use Only Dam es pgettt Sigrtatuit o stamps) Sanitary Permit Fee (umcludes Groundwater pproved �P ven Reason Surcharge Fee) ZSD o3 - 1X. Conditions of Approvaneasons for Disapproval 3> S SYSTEM OWNER: S� �m`"�' I Septic tank, effluent filter and ' c ox dispersal cell must all be serviced / maintained 4 w i �L as per management plan provided by plumber. voxss 1 "� Sits ,QC • e� Q� 2. All setback requirements must be maintained as per applicable code /ordinances. A-� f 0 • lS"r- x 11 inches in sipe % — Atta�h coatptete pleas (W the County onl9) [,or the m on kADDRESS PLAN PROJECT DalStock 1748 112th St. New Richmond Wi 54017 N . 1/2 SE 1 /4S 22 18 W TOWN Richmond COUNTY ST. CROIX MPRS Shaun Bird 226900, DATE 8/29/04 BEDROOM 4 CONVENTIONAL XXX IN -G UND PRESSURE CONVENTIONAL LIFT HOLDING TANK MOUND SEPTIC TANK SIZE 1255 gallons LIFT TANK SIZE DOSE TANK SIZE HOLDING TANK SIZE LOAD RATE .4 ABSORPTION AREA 1586 # of chambers 51 IL BENCHMARK V.R.P. Top of Survey Ir n am I ASSUME ELEVATION 100' Filter Zabel A -100 ❑ BOREHOLE O WELL * H. R. P Same as Benchmark SYSTEM ELEVATION 92.3/91.3/90.3 4' below qrade Alt. BM Top of 2" Pipe @ 100.2' Plans Designed Using —� Conventional Powts Alt. B.M. 252' Property Line Manual Version 2.0 90' B.M. Well is to meet all 0' Vents Scale is 1 " = 40' setbacks required by unless otherwise WDNR B -1 noted 3 -3' X 107' ells wil h �^ B >3' Spacin 1 , S e 5 - B -, 15' 1 31 rW� Please note: Installer must 15' verify all lot lines and setbacks before installation.! `I Pro 4 Vent Bedroom House > 6" Standard Biodiffuser of Cover Leaching Chamber with 3 1. 1 ft2 of Area 6' Long 11 " 3 4" Grade at System Elevation OP C. LOT PLAN PROJECT DalStbck ADDRESS 1748 112th St. New Richmond Wi 54017 N 1/i SE 1/4S 22 /T 18 W TOWN Richmond COUNTY ST. CROIX MPRS Shaun Bird 226900, DATE 8 /29/04 BEDROOM 4 CONVENTIONAL >00( IN- G UND PRESSURE CONVENTIONAL LIFT HOLDING TANK MOUND SEPTIC TANK SIZE 1255 gallons LIFT TANK SIZE DOSE TANK SIZE HOLDING TANK SIZE LOAD RATE .4 ABSORPTION AREA 1586 # of chambers 51 BENCHMARK V.R.P. Top of Survey Ir rr BKA l ASSUME ELEVATION 100' Filter Zabel A -100 ❑ BOREHOLE O WELL *H.R.P. SameasBenchmark SYSTEM ELEVATION 92.3/91.3/90.3 4 below qrade Alt. BM -Top of 2" Pipe @ 100.2' Plans Designed Using Conventional Powts Alt. B.M. 252' Propert Line Manual Version 2.0 90' B.M. �� Well is to meet all 20' Vents Scale is 1 = 40 setbacks required by unless otherwise WDNR B -1 noted AL 5' 3 -3' X 107' Cells wi B -3 4 >3' Spacing 11% 5' Slope B -2 15' 15' ST Please note: Installer must 310' Property Line verify all lot lines and setbacks 15' before installation. Pro 4 Vent Bedroom House >6 " Standard Biodiffuser of Cover Leaching Chamber I with 3 1. 1 ft2 of Area 6' Long 11" 3 4" Grade at System Elevation Wisconsin Department of commerce SOIL EVALUATION REPORT Page of Division of Safety and Buildings in accordance with Comm 85, Wis. Adm. Code /1 County Attach complete site plan on paper not less than 8 1/2 x 11 inches in size. Plan must include, but not limited to: vertical and horizontal reference point (BM), direction and Parcel I.D. percent slope, scale or dimensions, north arrow, and location and distance to nearest road. Please print all information. ewes b \ Date Personal information you provide maybe used for secondary purposes (Privacy Law, s. 15.04 (1) (m)).� Property Owner Property Location /� Govt. Lot 1/ 1/4 SQ T ON R E (o W Property Owne s Mailing Address Lot # I Block # ubd. Name CSM# - City to Zip Code Phone Number ❑ City ❑ Vl7ae Nearest Road J !7( ) ew Construction Use esidential / Number of bedrooms Code derived design flow rate GPD ❑ Replacement ubtic or commercial - Describe: 7SE Parent material � Flood Plain elevation if applicable n � ft. General comments E D and recommendations: I 4 2004 Boring # Boring ZONING OFFICE J it Ground surface elev. 0 ft. Depth to limiting factor in. Soil Application Rate Horizon Depth Dominant Color Redox Description Texture Structure Consistence Boundary Roots GPD/ff in. Munsell Qu. Sz. Cont. Color Gr. Sz. Sh. `Eff #1 •Eff#2 F-1 Boring # ❑ Boring ❑ Pit Ground surface elev. ft. Depth to limiting factor in Soil pcation Rate Horizon Depth Dominant Color Redox Description Texture Structure Consistence Boundary Roots GPD/ff in. Munsell Qu. Sz. Cont. Color Gr. Sz. Sh. `Eff#1 I `Eff#2 Effluent #1 = BOD > 30 < 220 mg/L and TSS >30 < 150 mg/L ` Effluent #2 = BOD < 30 mg/L and TSS < 30 mg/L CST Name (Please Print) Signatu CST Number Bird Plumbing, Inc. Shaun Bird 226900 Address Date Evaluation C t Telephone Number 1008 192nd Ave, New Richmond, WI 54017 ��/ -� 715- 246 -4516 Property Owner _ Parcel ID # Page of Ong # ❑ Boring ❑ Pit Ground surface elev. ft. Depth to limiting factor in. Soil — Application Rate Horizon Depth Dominant Color Redox Description Texture Structure Consistence Boundary Roots GPD/k in. Munsell Qu. Sz. Cont. Color Gr. Sz. Sh. 'Eff#1 `Eff#2 ❑ Boring # ❑ Boring ❑ pit Ground surface elev. ft. Depth to limiting factor in. Soil Application Rate Horizon Depth Dominant Color Redox Description Texture Structure Consistence Boundary Roots GPD/fF in. Munsell Qu. Sz. Cont. Color Gr. Sz. Sh. 'Eff#1 'Eff#2 F-1 Boring # ❑ Pit Boring ❑ Ground surface elev. ft. Depth to limiting factor in. Soil ication Rate Horizon Depth Dominant Color Redox Description. Texture Structure Consistence Boundary Roots GPD/ff in. Munsell Qu. Sz. Cont. Color Gr. Sz. Sh. 'Eff#1 I 'Eff#2 Effluent #1 = BOD > 30 < 220 mg/L and TSS >30 1150 mg/L ' Effluent #2 = BOD 130 mg/L and TSS < 30 mg/L The Department of Commerce is an equal opportunity service provider and employer. If you need assistance to access services or need material in an alternate format, please contact the department at 608- 266 -3151 or TTY 608 -264 -8777. sBD.8330 (RAM) PLOT PLAN `PROJECT DalStock ADDRESS 1748 112th St. New Richmond Wi 54017 N 1/2 SE 1/4S 22 /T 0 N/R 18 W TOWN Richmond COUNTY ST. CROIX MPRS Shaun Bird 226900 DATE 9 BEDROOM 4 CONVENTIONAL )00( IN -GRO D PRESSURE CONVENTIONAL LIFT HOLDING TANK MOUND SEPTIC TANK SIZE 1255 gallons LIFT TANK SIZE DOSE TANK SIZE HOLDING TANK SIZE LOAD RATE .4 ABSORPTION AREA 1586 # of chambers 51 IL BENCHMARK V.R.P. Top of Survey Iron ASSUME ELEVATION 100' Filter Zabel A -100 ❑BOREHOLE O WELL *H. R. P. Same as Benchmark SYSTEM ELEVATION 86.5/87.2/88.0 4.5' below qrade Alt. BM Top of 2" Pipe @ 100.2' Plans Designed Using Conventional Powts Alt. B.M. 252' Property Line Manual Version 2.0 90' B.M. Well is to meet all Vents setbacks required by 20' WDNR B -1 B -3 3 -3' X 107' Cells with B -4 35' 4 >3' Spacing 11% Slope 5' B -2 15' Scale is 1" = 40' 40 ST unless otherwise 30' noted Please note: Installer must 10' Pr perty Line verify all lot lines and setbacks Pro 4 before installation. Bedroom House > Standard Biodiffuser Leaching Chamber with 31.1 ft2 of Area Grade at System Elevation 34" ST. CROIX COUNTY r � WISCONSIN ZONING DEPARTMENT ST. CROIX COUNTY GOVERNMENT CENTER N r / N ■ ■ rr. 1101 Carmichael Road .� Hudson, WI 54016 -7710 .. Phone: (715) 386 -4680 Fax (715) 386 -4686 Memo to File From Pam Quinn Date: 4/27/2004 Rix Sandy loam structure misinterpretation on subdivision soil reports Recent soil on -site determinations have brought a problem to our attention. During these on- sites, borings were excavated to confirm soil conditions where two conflicting soil reports had been submitted for zoniflk department review. The soil profiles, evaluated by myself, Dave Fogerty, and Dave Steel (all certified soil testers) differed from the original soil reports in that massive ( structureless) sandy loams were encountered in horizons that were described as having either moderate, medium subangular blocky (2msbk) structure by Adam Schumaker or weak, medium granular structure (I mgr) by Shaun Bird. There apparently has been a misunderstanding between "structure" caused by handling samples of the soil during texturing versus the soil characteristics in situ. The soil, when chunks were taken out of the profile to hand texture, with pressure parted into "crumbs" that appeared at first to be subangular or granular in shape. However, these were not true peds that broke apart along planes of weakness, but fragments created by handling. The soil when observed in the horizon did not have distinct units of structure and should have been reported as "massive ". Added notation: on 4/23/04 Mark Iverson (Cedar Corp. certified professional soil scientist), Shaun Bird, and myself did an evaluation of soils on Lots 6 & 9, Richmond Meadows where the original soil report described the third horizon as sandy loam, "imgr ". On Lot 6 we checked soil profiles within a POWTS distribution cell and then excavated a test pit on Lot 9. The sandy loams in question were a weak, coarse to very coarse subangular blocky structure, where planes of weakness were just discernible when peds were parted from the profile. The peds separated with y= li t pressure by soil tester. Sand coatings were observed on the ped faces in the Lot 9 soils, which supported the determination that some structure existed to allow water to move through the upper portion of the sandy loam horizon. However, below the weak - structured soil we found massive (structureless) sandy loams and the boundary between these horizons was irregular, which would mean a distribution cell could encounter alternating weak and massive sandy loam. Shaun said he would amend his soil reports with a memo recommending that any sandy loams he identified as "lmgr" or "2 mgr" be assigned a lower loading rate of 0.3 gpd/ft2 (see attached memo for Whitetail Meadows) to provide a larger dispersal area. II Page Two — Soil Memo 4/27/04 Massive sandy loams have been assigned a soil application rate of 0.2 gpd/ft with the code changes in Comm 83.44 -2, effective as of 2/1/04. The application rates listed on the soil reports were higher due to the structure having been described as either weak or moderate, which affects the calculations for sizing of POWTS distribution cells. Obviously, one of the concerns is to make sure loading rates for the soils are not in error and allow undersized POWTS to be installed. For example, in December 2003, Lot 35 of Richmond Meadows subdivision had to have its loading rate reduced to 0.3 gpd/sq. ft. when the installer encountered massive sandy loam at the system elevation. The sandy loam horizon had been described on the soil report as "l mgr" with firm consistence. Leroy Jansky, Dept. of Commerce Regional Wastewater Specialist, has been consulted on this situation and advised the zoning department to require on -site verifications for any lots with this potential misinterpretation on the soil reports. All soil reports with sandy loam "1 or 2 mgr" as its structure will be required to use a design based on the current code's soil application rate for massive sandy loam @ 0.2 gpd/sq. ft. unless additional soil testing proves otherwise. Wiscons(n Department of Commerce SOIL EVALU R RT Page of Division of Safety and Buildings in accordance with Comm 85, Wis. Adm. Code County Attach complete site plan on paper not less than 8 112 x 11 inches in size. Plan must include, but not limited to: vertical and horizontal reference point (BM), direction and Parcel I.D. percent slope, scale or dimensions, north arrow, and location and distance to nearest roa . Please print all information. R 'ewed by Date Personal information you provide may be used for secondary purposes (Privacy Law, s. 15.04 (1) (m)). Property Owner Property Location cad • /��,� � T� c / `-/ � � �/ �� �,� Govt. Lot � 1/ ,� 1/4 S T N R E (o W Property Owner's Mai ' Address , Lot Block # I Subd. Name or M# City fate Zip Code Phone Number ; ❑City ❑ Villager Nearest Road New Construction USX Residential /Number of bedroom Code derived design flow rate - -��: � GPD ❑ Replacement Public or Fpmercial - Describe: —_ —__ -- - -- /J -- -- Parent material Flood / Plain elevation if applicable General comment enda and recanm +D [ evrt� -1 erxiations: s`y� �� Boring* Boring Pit Ground surface elev. R. Depth to limiting factor in. Soil Application Rate Horizon Depth Dominant Color Redox Description Texture Structure Consistence Boundary Roots GPD/fF in. Munsell Qu. Sz. Cont. Color Gr. Sz. Sh. 'Eff#1 'Eff#2 1 0 10 , vZ" . ,s z s tf CdYi C4,I) 2 Baing # Boring 4 rf lev �� ft. Depth to limiting factor u1. ® � pit Ground su ace e � P 9 � Soil Application Rate Horizon Depth Dominant Color Redox Description Texture Structure Consistence Boundary Roots GPD/ff in. Munsell Qu. Sz. Cont. Color Gr. Sz. Sh. 'Eff#1 'Eff#2 3 C- 1 9 3 of r , Effluent #1 = BOD > 30 < 220 mg/L and TSS >30 1150 ' Effluent #2 = BOD < 30 ffxA and TSS < 30 mg1L CST Name (Please Print) Si CST Number Bird Plumbing, Inc. Shaun Bird 226900 Address Date Evaluation Conducted Telephone Number 1008 192nd Ave, New Richmond, WI 54017 43_ r/__. 0 ::�s 715- 246 -4516 , 1 Property Owner _ Parcel ID # Page of F3 -1 Boring # ❑ Boring th to limiting facto pit Ground surface elev. ft. Depth Soil Application Rate Horizon Depth Dominant Color Redox Description Texture Structure Consistence Boundary Roots GPD/ff in. Munsell Qu. Sz. Cont. Color Gr. Sz. Sh. 'Eff#1 'Eff#2 r 31, M l z r3v �1 - �'� � " F-1 Boring # E] Boring ❑ Pit Ground surface elev. ft. Depth to limiting factor i^• Soil Rplication Rate Horizon Depth Dominant Color Redox Description Texture Structure Consistence Boundary Roots •E GPD in. Munsell Qu. Sz. Cont Color Gr. Sz. Sh. ❑ Boring E Bonng # Ground surface elev. ft. Depth to limiting factor in. ❑ pit 7 ence Application Horizon Depth Dominant Color Redox Description. Texture Structure Consist Boundary i in. Munsell Qu. Sz. Cont. Color Gr. Sz. Sh. .. ........ .. Effluent #1 = BOD > 30 220 rng/L. and TSS >30 1150 mgA- ' Effluent #2 = BOD _< 30 mg/1- and TSS _< 30 M91L The Department of Commerce is an equal opportunity service provider and employer. If you need assistance to access services or need material in an alternate format, please contact the department at 608- 266 -3151 or TTY 608 -264 -8777. SBD -8530 (R.61M) Soil Test Plot PI Pr6ject Name William Stock/Steve Dalton un Bir Address 1748 112th St. New Richmond Wi 54017 STM #226900 Lot 11 Subdivision Lundy Meadows Da a 8/11/03 N 1/2 SE 1/4S 22 T 30 N /R W Township Richmond M Boring ()Well PL Property Line County ST. CROIX BM or VRP Assume Elevation 100 ft. Top of Survey Iron System Elevation 92.3/91.3 *HRpSame as Benchmark Alt. BM Top of 2" Pipe @ 100.2' Alt. B.M. 252' Property Line 90' B.M. Scale is I " = 40 ' Please note: Installer must 94' 20' 96' unless otherwise verify all lot lines and setbacks B -1 noted before installation. 5 ' B -3 40 11% 5' Slope Please Note: Tested area -2 15' may not be suitable for desired building area. Check system location before excavating. ►� t~ a� a I � M I I I Maintenance and Contingency Plan for a Septic System Maintenance Plan 1. Septic Tank is to be pumped once every 3 years. 2. Effluent filter is to be cleaned once a year. Please note: a larger filter is being installed in order to extend the maintenance interval of the filter. 3. Once every 3 years, cells are to be inspected via the inspections pipes at the ends of the cells. 4. Owner agrees to limit greases, garbage, and water conditioner discharge into the system. 5. The owner agrees to save this plan. 6. Do not plant trees nor park nor drive over system. 7. Watershed is to be diverted away from system. 8. Discharge into system is not exceed those required as per Comm. 83 Cont' Plan ption #1. ystem fails, determine cause of failure, use alternate area and install new system in tested replacement area. Option #2. Install system at a lower elevation, by removing chambers, removing biomat, and install new system. Option #3. No adequate area is suitable for replacement area, and system elevation cannont be lowered. Install holding tank as last resort. 3. Replace any other failing components as needed. Plumber: Shaun Bird 715- 246 -4516 St. Croix County Zoning 715 - 386 -4680 Pumper Tom Mondor 715 - 246 -5148 Shaun Bird #226900 ST CROIX COUNTY SEPTIC TANK MAIN'T'ENANCE AGREEMENT AND OWNERSHIP CERTIFICATION FORM owner/Buyer Mailing Address Property Address (Verification required from Planning Department for new construction) City/State a �� N 1parcel Identification Number j Eg �, . DESCRIPTION > 11 �� _ �� W Town of 1Chhn0 pro Location / , + ' r /4, Sec. C xx T N R PAY Subdivision law ,� C'� Cc.� j Lot # Volume Page # Certified Survey Map # Warranty Deed # ,Volume ______ . Page # ts� Spec house 0 yes ❑ no Lot lines identifiable C�V Yes ❑ no SYSTEM MAINTEN main tenance Improper use and maintenanceof your septic system could result in its premature failure to handle watstYo Pr oper ut into the sy em consists of pumping out the septic tank every three years or sooner, if needed by a licensed pum can affect the function of the septic tank as a treatment stage in the waste disposal system- ent a certification form, signed by the owner and by a The property owner agrees to submit to St. Croix Zoning Dep verify�g that (1) the on - site wastewater disposal system mastcrplumbcr, journeyman plumber, restrictedplumberor a licensed pumper � tank is less than 1/3 full of sludge. is is proper O p e rating condition and/or (2) after inspection and pumping (if nm=ary), septic to maintain the private sewage disposal system with the standards I/we, the undersigned have read the above requirements and agree of Natural Resources, State of Wisconsin- Certifr�hO° W forth, herein, as set by the Department of Commerce and the Department Office within 30 stating that your septic system has been maintained must be completed and returned to the St- Croix County Zoning days of the three Year expiration date. —E- s.-i DATE SIGNATURE OF APPLICANT OWNER CERTIFICATIO of m kmowledge. I (we) am (are) the o wmerts) of I (we) certify that statements on this form are true to the best Y our ( ) the property descnbed above, by virtue of a warranty deed recorded in Register of Deeds Office. ,�►- DATE SIGNATURE OF APPLICANT may result in the sanitary petuut being revoked by the Zoning Department. 40000• Any information that is mis represented .. !!cation: a stamped warranty deed from the Register of Deeds office Include with this app a copy of the certified survey map if reference is made in the warranty deed 08/24/2004 22:40 17152462492 BILLSTOCK PAGE 01 - .............. -_.•. PAGE 01 . ... _ ._ —. U 24 39P 634 -74ZIP- STATE OAR Uk' WISCONSIN FORM 1- 2000 KATHLEEN H, WALSH WARRANTY DEED REGISTER OF DEEDS Document Number ST, CRO 1 X CO., w 1 RECEIVED FOR RECORD This Deed, made between L. Lawrence Williams and Virnina R. 10/21/2003 09:45AN Williams, husband and wife and each in their own ritrht Grantor, and Dalstock. LLC, a Wisconsin limited liability company Grantee. WARRANTY DEED Grantor, for a valuable consideration, conveys to Grantee the following EAEMPt # described real estate in 5t. Croix County, State of Wisconsin (the `Property ") REC FEE: 11,00 (if more space is needed, please attach addendum): TRANS FEE: 3015. 00 The South One -half of the Northwest Quarter (S 'h of NW '/, of Section COPY FEE: Twenty -three (23), Township Thirty (30) North, Range Eighteen (18) West, CC FEE: EXCEPT Lot One (1) of Certified Survey Map recorded in Vol. 8 of PAGES: I Certified Survey Maps, Page 2305 as document number 465057; AND The North One -half of the Southeast Quarter (N '/, of SE %) of Section Twenty -two (22), Township Thirty (30) North, Range Eighteen (18) West. Virginia R. Williams joins in this deed for the sole purpose of conveying any Recording Area interest she may have in the subiect property under the Marital Property 1,Nwt Nome tiro Raiurt . \adrr!.s of the State of Wisconsin. Robert J. Richardson Parcel Id numbers: Bakke Norman, SC 024 1061680 - 000: 026 1068 - 90 - 000: 026 - 1066 -80 -000: 026 - 1066 -90 -000 S233 McKay Ave., P.O. Box 399 Spring Valley, WI 54767 Together with all appurtenant rights, title and in(erests. Sce above Parcel Identification Number (PIN) This is not homestead prt)perty (i4) ('s not) Grantor warrants that the title to the Property is good, indefeasible in fee simple and free and clear of encumbrances except: easements, restrictions and rights of way of record Dated this 15th day of October 2003. ' L. Lawrence Williams Vir is R. Williams AUTHENTICATION ACKNO %VLEDGMENT. Sianature(s) L. Lawrence Williams and STATE OF WISCONSIN 1 Vir¢ina R. Williams ) ss. County ) authenticated this 1 th da f October 2003 Personally came before me this day of . 2003 the above named * o rt J. ,Richardso TI LF. MEMBER STATE BAR OF WISCONSIN (If not. to me known to be the oerson(s) who executed the foreeoine, authorized by 6706.06, Wis. Stats,) instrument and ackrlowledeed the same. THIS INSTRUMENT WAS DRAFTED BY ROBERT J. RICHARDSON. Bakke Norman SC SPRING VALLEY, WI 54767 Notary Public. State of My Commission is permanent. (If not. state expiration date: (518natures may be authenticated or acknowledged. Both are not necessary.) � Names of persons signing in any tspucity must he typed or printed below their signature. tNtY7.VRU (800)655-2021 www,;nfourofonn,,contiTA'rE 6AR OF wtsCU wARPAk't'1' DF.FD F'llARl Nn. 1. 2(tlta 1 rrl Vb i ? -« o C cn • _ _. -► r s � ! O� A \ \ n y 0 �\ • v w r R rn � 9. \ \ `b D Zyo rrl \ \ I.SO 5 I DI n z ;o \ .88'60£' I � (� • b h M Z I � r _\ � I01� Z Morz*,Z ► o I �I r = N D c��, i N „ i ~ ° Mr- N Q� >F i Q 0� � ; O I U) — ri z G QQ b Cn V I m D �0 0 1 " 300.51 ' { S 037718 E 11, i f v z OD zrIo N -a r4 • / p) h Q r p �� r p rn / ; Z N NORM / / o v h � 10 N�N� r / y O N Z z ° � // / 3�••4. v o c�02 I Jessie Nye Subject: S. Bird, Dalstock, Lundy Meadows Lot 11, 463004 Location: Richmond Start: Mon 9/13/2004 :00 PM End: Mon 9/13/2004 Recurrence: (none) 2 A .18. 1444 129th Street Condition on permit: soils must be verified by inspector that weak structure exists at system elevation or system sizing will have to be increased! memo attached to warn plumbers about system sizing if sandy loams were reported with "weak granular (1 mgr)" structure i� J } 3 Z 3 1 i inspector; Kevin Grabau Signature: Plumber: Bird, Shaun As Built: NA Revisions: Information Required Money ©wed: $0.00 Condition on permit: soils must be verified by inspector that weak structure exists at system elevation or system sizing will have to be increased! Notes: memo attached to rn wa plumbers about system sizing if sandy loams were reported with "weak granular (1mgr)" structure ST. CROIX COUNTY WISCONSIN ZONING DEPARTMENT -- - ST. CROIX COUNTY GOVERNMENT CENTER g M M q q q q M�••!� 1101 Carmichael Road Hudson, WI 54016 -7710 �•�• ---` � Phone: (715) 386 -4680 Fax (715) 386 -4686 Mem t0 File From: Pam Quinn Date: 4/27/2004 Re: Sandy loam structure misinterpretation on subdivision soil reports Recent soil on -site determinations have brought a problem to our attention. During these on- sites, borings were exc vated to confirm soil conditions where two conflicting soil reports had been submitted for zonig department review. The soil profiles, evaluated by myself, Dave Fogerty, and Dave Steel (all certified ed soil testers) differed from the original soil reports in that massive ( structureless) sandy loams were encountered m horizons that were de scribed as having either moderate, medium subangular blocky (2msbk) structure by Adam Schumaker or weak, medium granular structure (I mgr) by Shaun Bird. There apparently has been a misunderstanding between "structure" caused by handling samples of the soil during texturing versus the soil characteristics in situ. The soil, when chunks were taken out of the profile to hand texture, with pressure parted into "crumbs" that appeared at first to be subangular or granular in shape. However, these were not true peds that broke apart along planes of weakness, but fragments created by handling. The soil when observed in the horizon did not have distinct units of structure and should have been reported as "massive ". Added notation: on 4/23/04 Mark Iverson (Cedar Corp. certified professional soil scientist), Shaun Bird, and myself did an evaluation of soils on Lots 6 & 9, Richmond Meadows where the original soil report described the third horizon as sandy loam, "I mgr". On Lot 6 we checked soil profiles within a POWTS distribution cell and then excavated a test pit on Lot 9. The sandy loams in question were a weak, coarse to very coarse subangular blocky structure, where planes of weakness were just discernible when peds were parted from the profile. The peds separated with very light pressure by soil tester. Sand coatings were observed on the ped faces in the Lot 9 soils, which supported the determination that some structure existed to allow water to move through the upper portion of the sandy loam horizon. However, below the weak - structured soil we found massive (structureless) sandy loams and the boundary between these horizons was irregular, which would mean a distribution cell could encounter alternating weak and massive sandy loam. Shaun said he would amend his soil reports with a memo recommending that any sandy loams he identified as "Imgr" or "2 mgr" be assigned a lower loading rate of 0.3 gpd/ft2 (see attached memo for Whitetail Meadows) to provide a larger dispersal area. J ST. CROIX COUNTY WISCONSIN ZONING DEPARTMENT ST. CROIX COUNTY GOVERNMENT CENTER 1101 Carmichael Road Hudson, WI 54016 -7710 Phone: (715) 386 -4680 Fax (715) 386 -4686 Memo to File From: Pam Quinn Date: 4114/2004 Re: Soil On -site Determinations for Lots 32, 37 & 43 Richmond Meadows Subd. I On April 8, 2004 on -site determinations of soil conditions at the above lots was performed to evaluate conflicting soil reports submitted by Adam Schumaker and Shaun Bird. At 11:00 a.m. the weather /lighting conditions were acceptable, with temp. 50 °F, clear and. These determinations were requested by the property owner, Orenzo Oevering and the plumber /permit applicant, Dave Fogerty, who were present during the test pit excavations. Additional test pits were located next to borings on the original soil reports to better compare soil conditions in the tested areas. On lot 32 (see attached description) the soil profile contained massive sandy loams at approximately 36 inches below grade, which does not conflict with the soil tester's recommendation for using an at -grade system. What it did reveal, however, is that both Adam and Shaun likely misinterpreted the structure of the sandy loams: Adam called the sandy loam horizon a "2msbk" and Shaun uses "l mgr ". There apparently has been a misunderstanding between "structure" caused by handling samples of the soil during texturing versus the soil characteristics in situ. The soil, when chunks were taken out of the profile to hand texture, parted easily into "crumbs" that appeared at first to be subangular or granular in shape. However, these were not true peds that broke apart along planes of weakness , but fragments created by handling. The soil when observed in the horizon did not have distinct units of structure and should have been reported as "massive ". Two test pits were evaluated on Lot 37, since the sanitary permit has already been issued. Due to the current house and well location, additional tested area will be required to meet setbacks to the POWTS. A pit closest to Shaun's B2 did have a sandy horizon as reported, but only to a depth of 60 ", then underlain by a massive sandy loam. Unfortunately, the boundary between the sands and sandy loam horizon was very irregular, with tongues of sandy loam much closer to grade than 60 ". The recommended loading rate for this site would need to be lowered to adjust for varying pore space at system elevation. Lot 43 had conflicting reports, where Shaun's tested area (near the front of the lot) reported conditions allowing a conventional system and Adam's (closer to the rear of the lot) reported mottling at 32" with a mound system recommendation. Additional test pit B4 was excavated next to Shaun's B3 (see attached description) and massive sandy loams were encountered at 17 inches below grade. Weathered cobbles (break into smaller pieces upon disturbance) and oxidized iron deposits around individual gravel /cobbles were observed in the pit wall, but no mottling was identified to 68 ". Shaun's B3 description of sandy loam with "2mgr" structure starting at 18 ", then sandy loam "lmgr" from 36- 110 ". Again, I think there was a misinterpretation of texture after a sample had been handled. Leroy Jansky, Dept. of Commerce Regional Wastewater Specialist, has been consulted on this situation and advised the zoning department to require on -site verifications for any lots with this potential misinterpretation on the reports. Obviously, one of the concerns is to make sure loading rates for the soils are not in error and allow undersized POWTS to be installed. For example, in December 2003, Lot 35 had to have its loading rate reduced to 0.3 gpd/sq. ft. when the installer encountered massive sandy loam at the system elevation. The sandy loam horizon was described on the soil report as "I mgr" with firm consistence. The zoning department will have a note placed on all soil reports with this type of description as requiring a design using the current code's soil application rate for massive sandy loam @ 0.2 gpd/sq. ft. unless additional soil testing proves otherwise. / ? \ 0 m % k\ k M ° @ . � ± ° G\ � ; @ r � a• . [ 0�o _ $ j D § ¥ % § \ c co \ 0 dK\ � F � 2 0 ^ f 7 - 3 0 0 0 § § O § § mil r a « _ IV 0 0 L {� E E ; 3 , � \ E § z 0 0 x C) E ch cr (D CL !7§ 222 U C; CD @ E a= ° 2 & ; , <o;E �m CD \ /cD ) a' ca q« \� >$k2M mom« } S \ \ / z E , CD C) � ° 3 \ 2 d § } } \ m o (M2 $ � \ § . \/a ke \ {k/ ch �z* CD $ c� § \\k § . /k/ c \ ƒ� /\ K } \ % % C4 @3 G i \2 I 7 7 0 /] 2 � \ \ . ) / \ e0 �# � : \ CD \ 'S" \ .