HomeMy WebLinkAbout026-1160-30-000 .
^ m iv o
\
m CD 2 E
. § i '
e � lot
0 ƒ J 0 ° & M. ( U A -
� \ /_ } < / ƒ )_
(D 2
CD K k OD
\ } § 0 2
a a) /
� g E i e �
a§� % e
3 \ 2 \ !
2 �
4 OD K) E Q
CL 0 \ K 7 § [ c
/ 0 0 0 3
2 § 1 \ w
/ R § ■ ■ ca § ° 7
e
&� -� -0 k
m § § e.
N) E # ® i A
r k
\ / w z
, & 0
¥ /Eg99g 0
} /\[ /ff !f§ 1
`
�E` /C \
\ /F& §�C .
B E _ w CA
( k / /( \/ k $\
(2® q }
7 f EA( & ¥ §9
0 - tee- -
-o=
a - m -_ 2 ¥
T. J a ■ T w Cl)
LO CD C £ ■ K) 2
i z
%( /\ k
\ 2 »»
9 C : CL q z � �
/
; $E020 0
\ \2(kt ¥\
cD E (D < ) § "n
Ems,£ §
//E {3 0 E
®k�0
\ §a.crCD
/\ \cn0 y
»E7 <N #
m ,,mo = K
[�Ak�7 �
A «2/¥< >
/)i»[\ ƒ
. 7 \ /� '
eo <!i: a
_CD <- k-j
° S ® � }\ 2
[ 2 =� ■
; q
-o �§
i � ■
Bird Plumbing Inc.
1008 192nd Ave
New Richmond Wi 54017
715- 246 -4516
Subject: Whitetail Meadows Soil Tests
To Whom it may concern:
I Shaun Bird did the soil tests on this subdivision known as Whitetail Meadows in
Richmond township. After a couple of installations, some of the soils were found to have a
more weak structure than what was found in some of the borings. In order to protect home
owners and contractors, it is my recommendation after discussing the issue with Pam Quinn
from St. Croix County Zoning office that the systems be oversized using a.3 loading rate
Instead of the original .4 rate. On the lots that were originally sized for a.5, I recommend
using a.4, not the new .6 that the state has suggested. The soils are what the tests indicate
but the large areas tested did not reveal some of the weaker structures that were found
upon installations. If a installer can prove otherwise, that the weaker structures do not exist,
then the installer should proceed with the soils that he /she believes are present.
Shaun Bird
CST #226900
a -d
ds * = ii *o sa add
ST. CROIX COUNTY
WISCONSIN
<,. ZONING DEPARTMENT
ST. CROIX COUNTY GOVERNMENT CENTER
M N N M N N• ••• ■r. 1101 Carmichael Road
+y �� Hudson, WI 54016 -7710
A . _ Phone: (715) 386 -4680 Fax (715) 386 -4686
Memo to File
From: Pam Quinn
Date: 4/27/2004
Re: Sandy loam structure misinterpretation on subdivision soil reports
Recent soil on -site determinations have brought a problem to our attention. During these on-
sites, borings were excNvated to confirm soil conditions where two conflicting soil reports had
been submitted for zoning department review. The soil profiles, evaluated by myself, Dave
Fogerty, and Dave Steel (all certified soil testers) differed from the original soil reports in that
massive (structureless) sandy loams were encountered in horizons that were described as having
either moderate, medium subangular blocky (2msbk) structure by Adam Schumaker or weak,
medium granular structure (I mgr) by Shaun Bird. There apparently has been a
misunderstanding between "structure" caused by handling samples of the soil during texturing
versus the soil characteristics in situ. The soil, when chunks were taken out of the profile to hand
texture, with pressure parted into "crumbs" that appeared at first to be subangular or granular in
shape. However, these were not true peds that broke apart along planes of weakness, but
fragments created by handling. The soil when observed in the horizon did not have distinct units
of structure and should have been reported as "massive ".
Added notation: on 4/23/04 Mark Iverson (Cedar Corp. certified professional soil scientist),
Shaun Bird, and myself did an evaluation of soils on Lots 6 & 9, Richmond Meadows where the
original soil report described the third horizon as sandy loam, "lmgr ". On Lot 6 we checked
soil profiles within a POWTS distribution cell and then excavated a test pit on Lot 9. The sandy
loams in question were a weak, coarse to very coarse subangular blocky structure, where planes
of weakness were just discernible when peds were parted from the profile. The peds separated
with very li t pressure by soil tester. Sand coatings were observed on the ped faces in the Lot 9
soils, which supported the determination that some structure existed to allow water to move
through the upper portion of the sandy loam horizon. However, below the weak - structured soil
we found massive (structureless) sandy loams and the boundary between these horizons was
irregular, which would mean a distribution cell could encounter alternating weak and massive
sandy loam. Shaun said he would amend his soil reports with a memo recommending that any
sandy loams he identified as "I mgr" or "2 mgr" be assigned a lower loading rate of 0.3 gpd/ft2
(see attached memo for Whitetail Meadows) to provide a larger dispersal area.
I
Page Two — Soil Memo 4/27/04
Massive sandy loams have been assigned a soil application rate of 0.2 gpd/ft with the code
changes in Comm 83.44 -2, effective as of 2/1/04. The application rates listed on the soil reports
were higher due to the structure having been described as either weak or moderate, which affects
the calculations for sizing of POWTS distribution cells. Obviously, one of the concerns is to
make sure loading rates for the soils are not in error and allow undersized POWTS to be
installed. For example, in December 2003, Lot 35 of Richmond Meadows subdivision had to
have its loading rate reduced to 0.3 gpd/sq. ft. when the installer encountered massive sandy
loam at the system elevation. The sandy loam horizon had been described on the soil report as
"lmgr" with firm consistence.
Leroy Jansky, Dept. of Commerce Regional Wastewater Specialist, has been consulted on this
situation and advised the zoning department to require on -site verifications for any lots with this
potential misinterpretation on the soil reports. All soil reports with sandy loam "1 or 2 mgr" as
its structure will be required to use a design based on the current code's soil application rate for
massive sandy loam @ 0.2 gpd/sq. ft. unless additional soil testing proves otherwise.
I
ST. CROIX COUNTY
WISCONSIN
ZONING DEPARTMENT
III N U R n 11 tine ST. CROIX COUNTY GOVERNMENT CENTER
1101 Carmichael Road
Hudson, WI 54016 -7710
Phone: (715) 386 -4680 Fax (715) 386 -4686
-
Memo to File
From: Pam Quinn
Date: 4/14/2004
Re: Soil On -site Determinations for Lots 32, 37 & 43 Richmond Meadows Subd.
On April 8, 2004 on -site determinations of soil conditions at the above lots was performed to
evaluate conflicting soil reports submitted by Adam Schumaker and Shaun Bird. At 11 :00 a.m.
the weather /lighting conditions were acceptable, with temp. 50 °F, clear and. These
determinations were requested by the property owner, Orenzo Oevering and the plumber /permit
applicant, Dave Fogerty, who were present during the test pit excavations.
Additional test pits were located next to borings on the original soil reports to better compare soil
conditions in the tested areas. On lot 32 (see attached description) the soil profile contained
massive sandy loams at approximately 36 inches below grade, which does not conflict with the
soil tester's recommendation for using an at -grade system. What it did reveal, however, is that
both Adam and Shaun likely misinterpreted the structure of the sandy loams: Adam called the
sandy loam horizon a "2msbk" and Shaun uses "lmgr ". There apparently has been a
misunderstanding between "structure" caused by handling samples of the soil during texturing
versus the soil characteristics in situ. The soil, when chunks were taken out of the profile to hand
texture, parted easily into "crumbs" that appeared at first to be subangular or granular in shape.
However, these were not true peds that broke apart along planes of weakness , but fragments
created by handling. The soil when observed in the horizon did not have distinct units of
structure and should have been reported as "massive ".
Two test pits were evaluated on Lot 37, since the sanitary permit has already been issued. Due to
the current house and well location, additional tested area will be required to meet setbacks to the
POWTS. A pit closest to Shaun's B2 did have a sandy horizon as reported, but only to a depth
of 60 ", then underlain by a massive sandy loam. Unfortunately, the boundary between the sands
and sandy loam horizon was very irregular, with tongues of sandy loam much closer to grade
than 60 ". The recommended loading rate for this site would need to be lowered to adjust for
varying pore space at system elevation.
Lot 43 had conflicting reports, where Shaun's tested area (near the front of the lot) reported
conditions allowing a conventional system and Adam's (closer to the rear of the lot) reported
mottling at 32" with a mound system recommendation. Additional test pit B4 was excavated
next to Shaun's B3 (see attached description) and massive sandy loams were encountered at 17
inches below grade. Weathered cobbles (break into smaller pieces upon disturbance) and
oxidized iron deposits around individual gravel/cobbles were observed in the pit wall, but no
mottling was identified to 68 ". Shaun's B3 description of sandy loam with "2mgr" structure
starting at 18 ", then sandy loam "lmgr" from 36- 110 ". Again, I think there was a
misinterpretation of texture after a sample had been handled.
Leroy Jansky, Dept. of Commerce Regional Wastewater Specialist, has been consulted on this
situation and advised the zoning department to require on -site verifications for any lots with this
potential misinterpretation on the reports. Obviously, one of the concerns is to make sure
loading rates for the soils are not in error and allow undersized POWTS to be installed. For
example, in December 2003, Lot 35 had to have its loading rate reduced to 0.3 gpd/sq. ft. when
the installer encountered massive sandy loam at the system elevation. The sandy loam horizon
was described on the soil report as "lmgr" with firm consistence. The zoning department will
have a note placed on all soil reports with this type of description as requiring a design using the
current code's soil application rate for massive sandy loam @ 0.2 gpd/sq. ft. unless additional
soil testing proves otherwise.
I
Wisconsin Department of Commerce PRIVATE SEWAGE SYSTEM County: St. Croix
Safety and Building Division
INSPECTION REPORT Sanitary Permit No:
. � 453086 0
GENERAL INFORMATION (ATTACH TO PERMIT) State Plan ID No:
Personal information you provide may be used for secondary purposes [Privacy Law, s.15.04 (1)(m)].
Permit Holder's Name: City Village X Township Parcel Tax No:
Briese, Mike I Richmond Townshi
oZ6 //66 - - 666
CST BM Elev: Insp. BM Elev: BM Description: `i . z Section /Town /Range /Map No:
/03- 103, CS f (3 rye . CC , -5 1 ro _1k; �i 23.30.18. /Z (o
TANK INFORMATION ELEVATION DATA q.t
TYPE MANUFACTURER CAPACITY STATION BS HI FS ELEV.
Septic Benchmark
Dosing Alt. BM r / U
Z 3
Aeration Bldg. Sewer .� O
Holding St/Ht Inlet
TANK SETBACK INFORMATION St/Ht Outlet - 7 •
TANK TO P/L WELL BLDG. Vent to Air intake ROAD Dt Inlet
Septic Dt Bottom ej
Dosing Header /Man.
Aeration Dist. Pipe : ` 1. t
-) �L .4
li Holdin Bot. System
�G 8
Final Grade
PUMP /SIPHON INFORMATION
Manuf turer and St Cover
GPM
Model Numb e &"_
(3.
TDH Lift F ' do ss System Head TDH Ft
Forcemain ngth Dia.
SOIL ABSORPTION SYSTEM d $-
BEDlTRENCH Width Length No. Of Trenches PIT DIMENSIONS No. O Pits Inside Dia. Liquid Depth
DIMENSIONS `3 r /B S
SETBACK SYSTEM TO P/L JBLDG IWELL LAKE /STREAM LEACHING Manufacturer:
INFORMATION CHAMBER OR - -Z, : o c ; � `, t., �
Type Of System: , UNIT Model Number:
G c, n 2 � � �� t ' ( C D
DISTRIBUTION SYSTEM
Header /Manifold Distribution x Hole Size x Hole Spacing Vent to Air Intake
�,
Pipe(s) 7 / V C) r
Length �o Dia Length Dia Spacing
SOIL COVER x Pressure Systems Only xx Mound Or At - Grade Systems Only
Depth Over i� Depth Over xx Depth of xx Seeded /Sodded xx Mulched
Bed /Trench Center Ss Bed/Trench Edges Topsoil ] Yes L No 1 Yes
COMMENTS: (Include code discrepencies persons present, etc.) Inspection #1: / `- / / Inspection #2:
Location: 1361 146th Avenue New Richmond, WI 54017 (S 1/2 NW 114 23 T30N R18W) Whitetail Meadows Lot 30 Parcel No: 23.30.18.
1.) Alt BM Description= '�c, o� S, c/ .� 2 e 71 r ;+�
�lS O
2.) Bldg sewer length I ( S, ` ?vv_' V
- amount of cover '7•` --+- --
�'
�,��
Plan revision Required? , .j Yes 'L
- -'
Use other side for additional information.
SBD - 6710 (R.3/97)
Date Insepctor's Signature � Cert. No.
I
1
---° Safety and Buildings Division ty
5
2o1 W. Washington Ave., P.O. Box 7082 5 - a 1
FN
AF Madison, WI 53 707 — 7082 Sanitary Permit Number (to 511pd in by Co.)
�SCt�ItSflf (erg, � ............. � y �,j�
Department of Commerce rap sx_ Sate plan ID. Nu�nbet
Sanitary Permit Applicad n I
in accord Will: Comm 83.2 1, Ws. Adm. Code. persona] infotmati n you Ar9??0e ect A g
a`l ; ,; s jddress (if different than Mailing address)
may be used for secondary purposes Privacy law, 515. (1)(m) ' J v . Y .
I. Application Information — Please Print All Information ;
# Block #
Property Owner's Name i� p
l,
Property Location
Property G,j. ji gi , s Mailing Address
City, State Zip Code Phone Num 1 ee) ber ----//
N; +F
II. T e of Building (check all that apply) ; S � ub d di i Nate M N ber
2 Family Dwelling — Number of Bedrooms —
Pubuctcommercial — Describe Use ❑City GVillage wttsbip of
Q State Owned — Descrbe Use 3 vls� _ -
lIL Type of Permit: (Cheek only one box on line A. Complet ne B if appliestble) Q other Modification to Existing System
w Ssystem A. Q TreatttteatiHolding Tank Replacement Only
❑Replacement System
❑ d Date Issued
Change of [3 p Transfer to New
List Previous Permit Ntttnber an
B. ❑ Permit Renewal ❑Permit Rerision Plumber 0 "'neT
Before Expiration
IV. a of P0 S System: Check all that a 1 ❑ Single Pass Sand Filter O So AT
_pressurized is -Ground [) Mound 2 :24 in. of suitable soil ❑Mound < 24 �� Aerobic Treatmen Unit C] Recircj sting Sand Filter ❑
Constructed Wetland ❑ Pressurized la round 0 Holding Tank [] Peat Filter 3 i / F
Chamber ❑Drip Line ❑Gravel -1 Pi
❑ Other (explain) 1
Recireulatin Synthetic Media Filter F S Elevati
V. Dis ersalri'reatmentAtes Information: 10 ��� ;qt
i r 3 c Area Propo % a S
Design ow (gpd) Design Sou A HCO Race(gpdsf) (J �J O E l
3 prefab Site Fiber lastie
Capacity in Total Number Man Concrcte Constructed Glass
VL Tank Info Gallons Gallons of units f� � A L
New Existing i
TatilCs Tanks
Septic or Ho iding Tank
Aerobic Tmatment Unit
dosing Chamber
VII. Responsibility Statement - 1, the unders assume responsibility for installation of the PO�'TS shown on the Rttaeh P hone N err
Plumb ign MP/MPRS Number 6 /
Plumber's Name (Print) ature L
plumber's-Address (Street, ity, State, Zip e)
_^ ✓!✓G Da a Issu Lssuing Agent ignature o mmP )
VIII. oun /DeDiartmentUstUni
Sanitary Permit Fee (includes Groundwater / Z O
pproved ❑Disapproved Surcharge Fee) ')r71, �,
Q Owner Given Reason
IX. Conditions of ApproraURwsons for Disapproval f1,(7
SYSTEM OVVNER C O
eptic an , e duefilter and l ained s
dispersal cell must yj�� /
as per management plan provided by plumber.. (�i al ��� /W
2. All setback requirements must be maintained
a per applicable code /ordinances. :It Intact
3 . tem ea paper not less than at
Attack complete plans (te the Couety aaly) for the sys C� lT ti
W -6398 (R. 08102)
i
PIL 4T PLAN
PROJECT Mike Briese ADDRESS 1748 112th St. New Richmond Wi 50417
S 112 N'JV 1 /4S 23 IT 30 N/R 1 W TOWN Richmond COUNTY ST. CROIX
3/31/04 BEDROOM 4
MPRS Shaun Bird 226900 DATE
CONVENTIONAL XXX IN -GROU PRESSURE CONVENTIONAL LIFT HOLDING TANK
MOUND SEPTIC TANK SIZE 1260 gallons LIFT TANK SIZE DOSE TANK SIZE
HOLDING TANK SIZE LOAD RATE .4 ABSORPTION AREA 1586 # of chambers 51
BENCHMARK V.R.P. Top of 1/2" pipe ASSUME ELEVATION 100' Filter ZabelA -100
❑ BOREHOLE & WELL * H. R. P. Same as Benchmark
SYSTEM ELEVATION 96.0/95.9195.8 4' below grade
Alt. BM Top of survey iron in rock pile C& 100.4'
Plans Designed Using
Well is to meet all L Conventional Powts
setbacks required by Manual Version 2.0
WDNR Scale is 1 " = 40 '
unless otherwise
noted
Pro 4 Vent
Bedroom Standard Biodiffuser
Ho >6„ Leaching Chamber
of Cover with 31.1 ft2 of Area
6' Long 11 "
Grade at System Elevation
30' 3 -3" X 107' Cetls with >3'Spacing
B -3 its ope y Li
100 45
Vents
378' Property Line 90'
-1 i r
B
99' 2%
Slope W
-e -Z
Alt.
} rs`' B M. B.
�OT PLAN
PROJECT, Mike Brib ADDRESS 1748 112th St. New Richmond Wi 50417
S 1/2 NW 1 /4S 23 /T 30 N/R 1 W TOWN Richmond COUNTY ST. CROIX
MPRS Shaun Bird 226900 DATE 3 /31 /04 BEDROOM 4
CONVENTIONAL XXX IN -GROU PRESSURE CONVENTIONAL LIFT HOLDING TANK
MOUND SEPTIC TANK SIZE 1260 gallons LIFT TANK SIZE DOSE TANK IZE
HOLDING TANK SIZE LOAD RATE .4 ABSORPTION AREA 1586 # of chambe s 51
IL BENCHMARK V.R.P. Top of 1/2" pipe ASSUME ELEVATION 100' Filter Zabel A -100
❑ BOREHOLE (DWELL *H.R.P. Sameas Benchmark
SYSTEM ELEVATION 96.0/95.9/95.8 4' below qrade
Alt. BM Top of survey iron in rock pile 4 100.4'
Plans Designed Using
Well is to meet all AL Conventional Powts
setbacks required by Manual Version 2.0
WDNR Scale is 1" = 40'
unless otherwise
noted
Pro 4 Vent
Bedroom Standard Biodiffuser
House >6„ Leaching Chamber
of Cover with 3 1. 1 ft2 of Area
6' Long 1 1 "
Grade at System Elevation
5' 34"
T
30' 3 -3
00 " X 107' Cells with >3'Spacing
B -3 45 , 2,5W Property Li
1
Vents
S '
378' Property Line B 1 90, B -2
99'
2%
Slope 55'
Alt.
B.M.
B.
10'
Wisconsin cepartrient of commerce SOIL EVALUATION REPORT Page of
f Safety and Buildings Division o S ty s 9
in accordance with Comm 85, Wis. Adm. Code County t �
Attach complete site plan on paper no t less than 8 1/2 x 11 inches in size. Plan must
include, but not limited to: vertical and horizontal reference point (BM), direction and Parcel I. .
percent slope, scale or dimensions, north arrow, and location and distance to nearest road.
- ewed Date
Please print all information.
Personal information you provide may be used for secondary purposes (Privacy Law, s. 15.04 (1) (m)). 7
Property Owner Property Location
Govt. Lot 6 1 A S N R E (16W
Property Owners Mailing Address/ Lot # Block # Subd. t4ame or CSM#
City IState Zip Code Phone Number ❑ city 0 llage own Nearest Road /
jK� New Construction Us Residential 1 Number of bedrooms Code derived design flow rate % O GPD
❑ Replacement /❑ Publi or commercial - Describe: —� - ----- --- -- -
Parent material — Flood Plain elev lion if applicable ft.
General cartvrterrts <7 /{ /t=' I (/ � s-, �
and recommendations: !�'5��.
�] Boring
Ul Bori # i Ground surface elev. ft. Depth to limiting factor in. Soil Application Rate
Hori Dept h Dominant Color Redox Description Texture Structure Consistence Boundary Roots GPD/fF
in. Munsell Qu. Sz. Cont. Color Gr, Sz. Sh. `Eff#1 `Eff#2
3 r
3 , Sl /1? r%
l
a I
LJ r
®� # Boring
Pit Ground surface elev. ft. Depth to limiting factor in. Soil Application Rate
Horizon Depth Dominant Color Redox Description Texture Structure Consistence Boundary Roots GPD/fP
in. Munsell Qu. Sz. Cont. Color Gr. Sz. Sh. `Eff#1 `Eff#2
d.-j ` s� i 1 �, 2 3
Effluent #1 = BOD > 30 1 220 mglL and TSS >30 < 150 ` Effluent #2 = BOD < 30 mg/L and TSS < 30 mg/L
CST Naffte (Please Print) Si re CST Number
Bird Plumbing, Inc. Shaun Bird 226900
Address Date Evaluation Conducted Telephone Number
1008 19 rid Ave, New Richmond, WI 5401 .— 715- 246 -4516
- 50
Property Owner _ Parcel ID # Page of
Boring # ❑ Boring
it Ground surface elev. v V' �ft. Depth to limiting factor in. Soil i ti
q on Rate
Horizon Depth Dominant Color Redox Description Texture Structure Consistence Boundary Roots GPDM
in. Munsell Qu. Sz. Cont. Color Gr. Sz. Sh. 'Eff#1 *Eff#2
a-) Z' 1 "�Ya S L �2 M FY - � I - ,1
Z Z' oy C C 1 M c � �= rn Fv w Irk , Z
F-I Boring # ❑ Boring
❑ Pit Ground surface elev. ft. Depth to limiting factor in.
Soil Application Rate
Horizon Depth Dominant Color Redox Description Texture Structure Consistence Boundary Roots GPD/ff
in. Munseli Qu, Sz. Cont. Color Gr. Sz. Sh. 'Eff#1 'Eff#2
a Boring # ❑ Boring
❑ Pit Ground surface elev. ft. Depth to limiting factor in.
Soil Application Rate
Horizon Depth Dominant Color Redox Description. Texture Structure Consistence Boundary Roots GPD/ff
in. Munsell Qu. Sz. Cont. Color Gr. Sz. Sh. 'Eff#1 'Eff#2
i
Effluent #1 = BOD > 30 < 220 mg/L and TSS >30 < 150 mgA- ' Effluent #2 = BOD < 30 mg/L and TSS <_ 30 mg/L
The Department of Commerce is an equal opportunity service provider and employer. If you need assistance to access services or
need material in an alternate format, please contact the department at 608- 266 -3151 or TTY 608 -264 -8777.
SBD4330 (R.6400)
Soil Test Plot Pla
Project' Name William Stock/Steve Dalton Sh 4ir
Address 1748 112th St.
New Richmond Wi 54017 TM #226900
Lot 30 Subdivision Whitetail Meadows Date 8/15/03
S 1 /2 N W 1 /4S 23 T 30 N /13 W Township Richmond
❑ Boring Q Well PL Property Line County ST. CROIX
BM or VRP Assume Elevation 100 ft. Top of 1/2" Pipe
System Elevation 96.0/95.8 *HRPSame as Benchmark
Alt. BM Top of survey iron in rock pile @ 100.4'
Scale is 1" = 40'
Please note: Installer must unless otherwise
verify all lot lines and setbacks
before installation. noted
Please Note: Tested area
may not be suitable for
desired building area.
Check system location
before excavating.
a
t~
B -3 45' o
100'
00
30 N
2%
Slope 5 ,
378' Property Line
B -1 0 B -2
99'
55'
Alt.
* B.
1 '
ST CROIX COUNT'
MAINTENANCE AGREEMENT`
SE PT
IC `TANK
OWNERSHIP CERTIFICATION FORM
Owner(Suyer� L/
' Address
Mailing
Address / 3
Property D artment for new cons
truction)
(VE:rificatiou required from Planning eP
parcel Identification Number
city/state
LEGAL DESSAILL' XON 1/4 Tss�
s r '� ' S eC � Town of
- W, —
Property r- OCatian _ off. Lot #
Subdivision L am=
Volume , Page #
Certified Survey Map # 3
Warranty Deed # SS
� Volume �S a �--� page #
�,� Lot lines identifiable�Yes 0 no
Spec house D yes
SYSTEM NICE remature failure to handle wastes. Proper maintenance
ImproPCZ use and maintenance every your septic system couldresult in its P a licensed pumper- What you put into the system
out the septic task every th1eC Ycars or sooner, if needed by
consists of pumping
can affect the function tan
.cf the septic k as a treatment stage in the waste disposal system.
signed by the owner and by a
e owner agrees to subm m
it to St. Croix Zoning Department a that foam,
The proper er verifying that (1) the on -site wastewatezdisposalsycte journey.nanplumber, restrsctedplumber Ora licensedpump the se tic tank is less than 113 full
of sludge.
rnas
is s proper operating condition and/or (2) after inspection and pumping (if necessary), P
sal system with the standards
ed h2.ve read the above r equirements and agree to maintain the Private sewage , dis Wisconsin. Certification
Uwe, the undersign t of Commerce and the Depamat of Natural Resources, Zoning Off ce within 30
set forth, herein, as set t y the Departmen leted and returned to the St. Croix County
static that your septic system has been maintained must be comp
IGNA the ee expiration date. 3 � l a DATE
OF APPLICANT
OWNER CERTIF.(CA_ _ TION ` knowled e I (we) am (are) the owner(s) of
I (we) certify that all statements on this form deed recorded to Register of Deeds Office.
WIGNA rty de cribed tibove, by virtue of a warranty
DATE
TJRE OF APP.1CANT
informat that is mis- representedmay result in the sanitary permit being revoked by the Zoning Department.
Any
d warranty deed from the Register of Deeds office deed
Include with this application: a stamped if reference is made in the warranty
a copy of the certified survey map
' is
Plan for a Sept Sy stem
Maintenance and Contingency
Maintenance Plan
1. Septic Tank is to be pumped once every 3 years.
2. Effluent filter is to be cleaned once a year. Please note: a larger filter is being installed in
order to extend the maintenance interval of the filter.
3. Once every 3 years, cells are to be inspected via the inspections pipes at the ends of
the cells.
4. Owner agrees to limit greases, garbage, and water conditioner discharge into the system.
5. The owner agrees to save this plan.
6. Do not plant trees nor park nor drive over system.
7. Watershed is to be diverted away from system.
8. Discharge into system is not exceed those required as per Comm. 83
C ncy Plan
Option #1. If system fails, determine cause of failure, use alternate area and install new
in tested replacement area.
Option #2. Install system at a lower elevation, by removing chambers, removing biomat,
and install new system.
Option #3. No adequate area is suitable for replacement area, and system elevation
cannont be lowered. Install holding tank as last resort.
3. Replace any other failing components as needed.
Plumber: Shaun Bird 715- 246 -4516
St. Croix County Zoning 715 - 386 -4680
Pumper Tom Mondor 715 -246 -5148
Shaun Bird #226900
U. 2522P 335
7�59a 1
STATE BAR OF WISCONSIN FORM 2 - 1999
Document Number
WARRANTY DEED REGISTER OF DEEDS
ST. CROIX CO., WI
This Deed, made between Dalstock. LLC RECEIVED FOR RECORD
and Michael H. Briese and Billie Jo Briese Grantor, 03/08/2004 10:00AN
Grantee. WARRANTY DEED
Grantor, for a valuable consideration, conveys and warrants to Grantee EXEDPT #
the following described real estate in St. Croix County, State of Wisconsin REC FEE: 11.00
(if more space is needed, please attach addendum): TRANS FEE: 126.00
Lot 30, White Tail Meadows. St. Croix County, Wisconsin. COPY FEE:
CC FEE:
PAGES: 1
Recording Area
Name and Return Address
MISTINIA OOLAND
ATTORNEY AT LAW
P.O. BOX 359
HUDSON, WI 54016
026 - 1068- 90-000
Parcel Identification Number (PIN)
This is not homestead property
(is) (is not)
Exceptions to warranties: Easements, restrictions and rights -of -way of record, if any.
Dated this day of March _ ' 2004 a
- - - - - - -- - --
AUTHENTICATION ACKNOWLEDGMENT
Signature(s) Dalstock, LLC By_ Pj j ( -(,, el c Al - — STATE OF )
ss.
County )
authenticated this 4 -C 14 - day of March 2004
Personally came before me this _— day of
the above named
* K ristina O land
TITLE: MEMBER STATE BAR OF WISCONSIN
(If not, _ to me known to be the person(s) who executed the foregoing
authorized by § 706.06, Wis. Stats.) instrument and acknowledged the same.
THIS INSTRUMENT WAS DRAFTED BY
A ttorney Krishna O gland
Hudso WI 54016 Notary Public, State of
My Commission is permanent. (If not, state expiration date:
(Signatures may be authenticated or acknowledged. Both are not necessary.) _-- _- - - - - -- — — -- — ^ ,)
* Names of persons signing in any capacity must be typed or printed below their signature. Information Professionals Co., Fond du Lac, wl
STATE BAR OF WISCONSIN 800 - 655 -2021
WARRANTY DEED FORM No. 2 -1999
- it bs ££S `011 "�'�, uaLUasD3 — .
81107 d 9bDgIDJp 1 1
s v °r
,06'95 —
OD
o iv •86 8 \ 4� � -- -
o p l�
;uawaso3 \ ,�
I O co I �`�Z� ;Wok �� ,SO'LOL
Z
W107
W
.p
cC
3 0 N ° N SPJOD 99'l rn
a 9"i�Z 9�S Op N O N w bs lL9 `l9
SPJOD S9 'l . oo . 9 OD -9 107
N 'ji 'bs OZO `ZL : r w
v v AE107 or)
I uo/sualxa pool uodn•' .rr
w 'paclsrnbugxa aq o ;'of
N luacuasD3 .98 £'6
r /fJoJOdcua1 sn�po?Ja08', r� �� .9* ?
M„ 5Z,6 *,.68S roMaAup ;uior
moo q ,£ V66 L \
L9'86 L 3„9Z,6t.68N
\ / , .8, .ZZ SPJOD
;uacuaso3 bS
—� ff ,f'f � — .foManup
I ;u /or 8•
Z i� �• puo/;aM
01 0 � 4 6ui;six7
\ M \
W
saJOO £9'!
+r6 , OZ saJOD l9'l
"= l 107 w y bs 996 `9L
M 1107 % saJOO >b8 Z
;/ bs + *S f Zl
j
in O
N ���, E107
.sF o
• , 0'66 - 9979Z
*/l MN a4i 1
qQp oil v - 10 Pull 4