HomeMy WebLinkAboutBoard of Adjustment 06-27-96AGENDA
ST. CROIX COUNTY
NOTICE OF COMMITTEE MEETING
TO: Robert M. Boche, Chairman
St. Croix County Board
FROM: John Bradley, Chairman
COMMITTEE TITLE: St. Croix County Board of Adjustment
DATE: Thursday, June 27, 1996
TIME: 8:30 a.m. Old Business
9:00 a.m. New Business
LOCATION: Government Center, Hudson, WI
CALL TO ORDER:
ROLL CALL:
ADOPTION OF AGENDA:
ACTION ON PREVIOUS MINUTES:
DATE OF NEXT MEETING:
UNFINISHED BUSINESS: Jeffrey Lauck/Tim & Judy Dove
John & Jim Doornink
John Murtha/Don Jackelen **
OLD BUSINESS: Jana Paulson/Brooksbank
William Derrick
NEW BUSINESS: See Attachment *
OTHER:
ANNOUNCEMENTS AND CORRESPONDENCE:
POSSIBLE AGENDA ITEMS FOR NEXT MEETING:
ADJOURNMENT:
(agenda not necessarily presented in this order)
SUBMITTED BY: St. Croix County Zoning Office
DATE: June 7, 1996
* June 13, 1996
** June 14, 1996
COPIES TO: County Board Office
County Clerk
Committee Members
News Media/Notice Board
**ADDITIONS/CHANGES/CORRECTIONS
AGENDA
ST. CROIX COUNTY
NOTICE OF COMMITTEE MEETING
TO: Robert M. Boche, Chairman
St. Croix County Board
FROM: John Bradley, Chairman
COMMITTEE TITLE: St. Croix County Board of Adjustment
DATE: Thursday, June 27, 1996
TIME: 8:30 a.m. Old Business
9:00 a.m. New Business
LOCATION: Government Center, Hudson, WI
CALL TO ORDER:
ROLL CALL:
ADOPTION OF AGENDA:
ACTION ON PREVIOUS MINUTES:
DATE OF NEXT MEETING:
UNFINISHED BUSINESS: Jeffrey Lauck/Tim & Judy Dove
John & Jim Doornink
OLD BUSINESS: Jana Paulson/Brooksbank
William Derrick
NEW BUSINESS: See Attachment *
OTHER:
ANNOUNCEMENTS AND CORRESPONDENCE:
POSSIBLE AGENDA ITEMS FOR NEXT MEETING:
ADJOURNMENT:
(agenda not necessarily presented in this order)
SUBMITTED BY: St. Croix County Zoning Office
DATE: June 7, 1996
* June 13, 1996
COPIES TO: County Board Office
County Clerk
Committee Members
News Media/Notice Board
**ADDITIONS/CHANGES/CORRECTIONS
PUBLIC HEARING
The St. Croix County Board of Adjustment has scheduled a public
hearing for Thursday, June 27, 1996 at 8:30 a.m. at the Government
Center, 1101 Carmichael Rd., Hudson, Wisconsin to consider the
following appeals to the St. Croix County Zoning Ordinance. An on -
site investigation will be made of each site in question, after
which the board will return for the purpose of deliberating and
voting on the appeals.
1. ARTICLE: 17.64 Setback Variance from a County Road
APPELLANT: David James Meister
LOCATION: SE-,, SEk, Sec. 19, T30N-R18W, Town of
Richmond
2. ARTICLE: 17.155 Home Occupation - Woodworking Shop
APPELLANT: Jeffrey J. Egan
LOCATION: SEk, SEk Sec. 13, T31N-R18W, Town of Star
Prairie
3. ARTICLE: 17.29 (1) (a) Filling and Grading
Shoreland
APPELLANT: Glen Boldt
LOCATION: Part of Govt. Lot 2, NEk, NEk, Sec. 1,
T29N-R17W, Town of Hammond
4. ARTICLE: 17.155 Home Occupation - Furniture Repair
APPELLANT: Brenda Peterson/Chris and Laura Fischer
LOCATION: SEk, NV,, Sec. 1, T29N-R20W, Town of
St. Joseph
5. ARTICLE: 17.15 (6) (a) Two Family Dwelling
APPELLANT: Robert and Lilly Ann Hartmon
LOCATION: SE'-,, SWk, SW,, SEk, Sec. 2, T29N-R19W,
Town of St. Joseph
6. ARTICLE: 17.70 (3) (c) (3) Temporary Occupancy
(Correction)
APPELLANT: Bruce & Patty Schultz
LOCATION: SEk, SE-,, Sec. 10, T31N-R17W, Town of
Stanton
7. ARTICLE: 17.18 Commercial Mini Storage
APPELLANT: Earnest E. Gustafson/Ken and Barb Zak
LOCATION: Part of Govt. Lot 2, Sec. 22, T30N-R20W,
Town of St. Joseph
8. ARTICLE: 17.14 (6) (h) Livestock Operation
APPELLANT: Bomaz, Inc./Greg and Bob Zwald
LOCATION: Sz, NEk, SW, and the Nz, SEk, SW, all in
Sec. 8, T28N-R17W, Town of Pleasant Valley
(over)
9. ARTICLE: 17.64 (5) (a) Driveway Variance on a
Town Road
APPELLANT: Lon & Brigette Feia
LOCATION: SW,, SE9j Sec. 32, T29N-R18W, Town of
Warren
10. ARTICLE: 17.18 Commercial Sign
APPELLANT: Rodney Wolff/Eric Canfield
LOCATION: NW;, NW,, Sec. 18, T30N-R19W, Town of
Somerset
11. ARTICLE: 17.14 (6) (h) Livestock Operation
APPELLANT: Steve and Dick Ulrich/Robert Click
LOCATION: NE,, SE ; , SE ; , SE ; , Sec. 33, T31N-R17W
Town of Warren
12. ARTICLE: 17.18 Commercial Mini Storage
APPELLANT: John Mortell/M & M Storage, Inc.
LOCATION: NE;, SE4, Sec. 31, T29N-R16W, Town of
Baldwin
13. ARTICLE: 17.155 Home Occupation/Cabinet Shop
APPELLANT: George & Emily Vondriska
LOCATION: SW;, SW,-, Sec. 31, T29N-R18W, Town of
Warren
14. ARTICLE: 17.15 (i) Salvage Operation
APPELLANT: Roger & Dorene German
LOCATION: SE;, NE,, Sec. 22, T28N-R17W, Town of
Rush River
All interested persons are invited to attend said hearing and be
heard. Additional information may be obtained from the office of
the St. Croix County Zoning Administrator, Hudson, Wisconsin at
(715) 386-4680.
John Bradley, Chairman
St. Croix Co. Board of Adjustment
BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT MEETING AND HEARING
St. Croix county Government Center, Hudson, Wisconsin
(This meeting was recorded by a court report)
Thursday, June 27, 1996
The meeting was called to order by Chairman Bradley at 8:30 a.m.
A roll call was made. Jensen, Mehls, Menter and Bradley were
present. Filipiak had an excused absence.
Jensen motioned to approve the agenda, second by Menter. Motion
carried.
July 25, 1996 will be the date of the next hearing.
Jensen motioned to adopt minutes, second by Menter. Motion
carried.
UNFINISHED BUSINESS:
Jeff Lauck/Tim & Judy Dove
Nelson stated they have received support from the township for
their request for a battery storage facility in a commercial
district. Nelson introduced Exhibit #1, a packet of information
from the 4/25/96 hearing (labeled Exhibit #1) containing two pages
.of photos showing the storage; Exhibit #2, a two page sheet
entitled "Hazardous Material Qualifications"; Exhibit #3, spec
sheets listing the type of batteries they typically use; Exhibit
#4, a page entitled "Intended Use of Property"; Exhibit #5,
correspondence from the Town of Somerset, dated 6/26/96 stating
approval of this request.
Angie Dove, being previously sworn, stated she has met with the two
township committees. She said she has a problem with the
$5,000/year insurance bond and the $1,000/year environmental bond
which the planning committee suggested they obtain. She said her
father is frustrated and doesn't want to obtain more insurance as
it would tie up $50,000 of their assets. Dove added that the DNR
said their batteries were not considered hazardous material.
Bradley read the portion of the Somerset minutes requesting the
various types of bonding. Mehls said the Board seeks compliance.
Craig Peterson, being duly sworn, stated he is the attorney for
Jeff Lauck who is selling the property to the Doves. Peterson said
the insurance bonding requirement was suggested and not mandated by
the Town Board. He added that the cost would be a major
undertaking and the chance of a hazardous spill is minimal.
Bob Pierce, previously sworn, presented Exhibit #6, the conditions
presented to the Doves expressing the requirement of the $50,000
bond. Pierce stated their concern was with the assets of the
business and, if in the event of a hazardous spill, would the
business have enough assets to cover the cost of the clean up.
Roger & Dorene German
Bradley asked Corp. Counsel's Timmerman to update the Board on the
German matter. Timmerman stated the German matter had been
remanded to the Board of Adjustment and would have to be heard as
if it were a new application and that none of the evidence from the
past could be considered when hearing their request.
John Murtha/Don Jackelen
Nelson told the Board this matter was before them a couple of
months ago and reminded them of the concerns they had with signage,
blacktopping, removal of junk and screening. Nelson noted that
Murtha/Jackelen would be before the Board next month asking for a
deck variance.
Nelson introduced Exhibit #1, a revised site plan showing screened
fencing; Exhibit #2, a bid from Asphalt Associates dated 6/27/96.
Jackelen, being previously sworn, stated the screening plans on
south side of building will hide accumulation of stuff from view
and added he was unaware that blacktopping was a requirement.
Nelson presented Exhibit #3, a drawing of the new signage they
would be using; Exhibit #4, a drawing of the new sign.
Mehls inquired about the fence screening. Jackelen stated the
fence would be 6' tall and shrubbery and trees would be planted on
the fence line. He said he wanted it to be a neat and clean site.
OLD BUSINESS:
William Derrick
Nelson stated this was a request for an extension of a permit which
was granted to them last year and since that time, there has been
a transfer of property to Cemstone/Mathy Construction. Nelson read
last year's decision. It was noted there was opposition to this
request.
Nelson introduced Exhibit #1, a certificate from Continental
Casualty Company dated 6/16/94 which was updated on 5/17/96;
Exhibit #2, a certificate of insurance dated 5/17/96; Exhibit #3,
a site plan identifying important marks and elevation. Nelson
stated the applicant is requesting an extension of four years.
Bradley inquired about reclamation and berm. Nelson stated they
have not started mining yet and berming was to be built on County
Road G.
Steve Becken, being duly sworn, stated he is President of
Cemstone/Mathy Construction and that address to be 1190 County Road
G, New Richmond, Wisconsin. Barton Lund, being duly sworn, stated
he is the Manager for Monarch Paving and his address to be 315 -
50th Avenue, Clear Lake, Wisconsin. Becken stated this was a joint
purchase with Mathy Construction. He said Cemstone needs the sand
and gravel and Mathy is the asphalt plant. Becken noted that
pollution and dust control is governed by the DNR and they are
currently going through the process of testing for dust. He said
the permit fee is based on how much dust is produced.
Becken stated they have 40 acres they want to mine and no black
dirt has been removed; the black dirt will be used to reclaim the
property.
Bradley asked about the 80 acres they own. Becken said the 80
acres runs to the northeast and won't last for ever. He said they
will probably be working these 80 acres for the next 20 to 25
years. Becken thought they were approved for a five year permit.
Lund stated they have been with Monarch and have lived up to all
the conditions in the past. He said he needs the materials for
their operation as well.
Bradley stated that the Board would view the site and render a
decision:
NEW BUSINESS:
The hearing was called to order by Chairman Bradley at 9:20 a.m.
Nelson read the notice of the hearing as published:
PUBLIC HEARING
The St. Croix County Board of Adjustment has scheduled a public
hearing for Thursday, June 27, 1996 at 8:30 a.m. at the Government
Center, 1101 Carmichael Rd., Hudson, Wisconsin to consider the
following appeals to the St. Croix County Zoning Ordinance. An on -
site investigation will be made of each site in question, after
which the board will return for the purpose of deliberating and
voting on the appeals.
1. ARTICLE: 17.64 Setback Variance from a County Road
APPELLANT: David James Meister
LOCATION: SE'-,, SE4 Sec. 19, T30N-R18W, Town of Richmond
2. ARTICLE: 17.155 Home Occupation - Woodworking Shop
APPELLANT: Jeffrey J. Egan
LOCATION: SE4, SE4 Sec. 13, T31N-R18W, Town of Star
Prairie
3. ARTICLE: 17.29 (1) (a) Filling and Grading Shoreland
APPELLANT: Glen Boldt
LOCATION: Part of Govt. Lot 2, NE4, NE4, Sec. 1,
T29N-R17W, Town of Hammond
4. ARTICLE: 17.155 Home Occupation - Furniture Repair
APPELLANT: Brenda Peterson/Chris and Laura Fischer
LOCATION: SE4, NE4, Sec. 1, T29N-R20W, Town of
St. Joseph
5. ARTICLE: 17.15 (6) (a) Two Family Dwelling
APPELLANT: Robert and Lilly Ann Hartmon
LOCATION: SEq, SWq, SWq, SEq, Sec. 2, T29N-R19W,
Town of St. Joseph
6. ARTICLE: 17.70 (3) (c) (3) Temporary Occupancy
APPELLANT: Bruce & Patty Schultz
LOCATION: SEq, SE Sec. 10, T31N-R17W, Town of
Stanton
7. ARTICLE: 17.18 Commercial Mini Storage
APPELLANT: Earnest E. Gustafson/Ken and Barb Zak
LOCATION: Part of Govt. Lot 2, Sec. 22, T30N-R20W,
Town of St. Joseph
8. ARTICLE: 17.14 (6) (h) Livestock Operation
APPELLANT: Bomaz, Inc./Greg and Bob Zwald
LOCATION: Sk, NE4, SW-', and the W-2, SE4, SWq all in
Sec. 8, T28N-R17W, Town of Pleasant Valley
9. ARTICLE: 17.64 (5) (a) Driveway Variance on a
Town Road
APPELLANT: Lon & Brigette Feia
LOCATION: SWq, SEq, Sec. 32, T29N-R18W, Town of
Warren
10. ARTICLE: 17.18 Commercial Sign
APPELLANT: Rodney Wolff/Eric Canfield
LOCATION: NWq, NWq, Sec. 18, T30N-R19W, Town of
Somerset
11. ARTICLE: 17.14 (6) (h) Livestock Operation
APPELLANT: Steve and Dick Ulrich/Robert Click
LOCATION: NEq, SEq, SEq, SEq, Sec. 33, T31N-R17W
Town of Warren
12. ARTICLE: 17.18 Commercial Mini Storage
APPELLANT: John Mortel/M & M Storage, Inc.
LOCATION: NE%9j SEq, Sec. 31, T29N-R16W, Town of
Baldwin
13. ARTICLE: 17.155 Home Occupation/Cabinet Shop
APPELLANT: George & Emily Vondriska
LOCATION: SW,, SW-',, Sec. 31,T29N-R18W, Town of
Warren
14. ARTICLE: 17.15 (i) Salvage Operation
APPELLANT: Roger & Dorene German
LOCATION: SEq, NE Sec. 22, T28N-R17W, Town of
Rush River
All interested persons are invited to attend said hearing and be
heard. Additional information may be obtained from the office of
the St. Croix County Zoning Administrator, Hudson, Wisconsin at
(715) 386-4680.
John Bradley, Chairman
St. Croix Co. Board of Adjustment
Jeffrey Egan
Nelson stated this was a request for a permit for a home occupation
which is a permitted use by a special exception use permit. Nelson
noted the structure would have to be 500 feet from any other
residence and no larger than 1,000 square feet. Nelson introduced
Exhibit #1, building plans and a site plan showing a 50' x 30' shop
north and east of their residence; Exhibit #2, details of
operation, Nelson read the details in order as they appeared;
Exhibit #3, correspondence from the Town of Star Prairie stating
approval.
Jeff and Karen Egan, being duly sworn, stated their address to be
611 Paperjack Drive, New Richmond, Wisconsin. Mr. Egan stated he
has worked in a cabinet shop for Derrick Construction for 10 years
and does fireplace mantels on the side. Mr. Egan said he wants to
make his business legal and hopes he doesn't have to be zoned
commercial., He added that Dan Casey would zone him commercial if
he needed to.
Bradley asked how large the property was. Mr. Egan stated 327' x
425' and that the shop could not be 500 feet from the house because
they are talking about a lot and not acreage.
Egan presented photos of products he made and these were labeled as
Exhibit #4; Exhibit #5, a letter to Neal Baker, an adjoining
landowner; Exhibit #6, a similar letter to the current property
owner stating intentions of plan after purchase.
Mehls inquired about storage of finishes. Mr. Egan stated metal
containers would be used for finishes. He said he uses paint
thinner and the rags he uses are laid out to dry. The paint
thinner is taken to Eau Claire when 10 or 15 gallons is
accumulated.
Mehls asked if the property was staked. Mr. Egan stated the house
and shop were both staked.
John Heintz, being duly sworn, stated he is the Chairman for the
Town of Star Prairie and noted that the Town Board has no
objections to this request.
Bradley indicated that the Board would view the site and render a
decision.
Glen Boldt
Nelson stated this was a request for filling and grading on the
shore of Pine Lake as well as riprapping. Nelson noted that this
was not a permitted use, but rather permitted by a special
exception. Nelson introduced Exhibit #1, a letter from the Town
Board stating their approval; Exhibit #2, a site plan of the
proposed project.
Glen Boldt, being duly sworn, stated his address to be 2076 - 117th
Avenue, Baldwin, Wisconsin. Boldt stated he obtained a permit from
the DNR in Eau Claire a year ago and this request is the result of
water erosion of about 200 feet.
Bradley asked how much shoreline Boldt intended to remedy. Boldt
stated about 500 feet.
Bradley indicated that the Board would view the site and render a
decision.
Brenda Peterson/Chris and Laura Fischer
Nelson stated this was a request for a home occupation for a
furniture repair business. Nelson introduced Exhibit #1, a three
page narrative of their project; Exhibit #2, a building plan
showing the total dimension to be 40' x 251; Exhibit #3, a drawing
of the shop showing a dimension of 24' x 401; Exhibit #4, a drawing
of the building showing the front entrance; Exhibit #5, a two page
construction proposal from Wayne Oslund Construction; Exhibit #6,
a map from the Real Property Lister's office showing -the location
of the property (423F, Lot 4); Exhibit #7, a diagram of the
property; Exhibit #8, Hazardous Waste Generator Inspection Report
from the State of Minnesota, eight pages total; Exhibit #9, two
pages labeled "Industrial Waste Clarifier"; Exhibit #10, diagram of
a rinse booth, two pages; Exhibit #11, a spec sheet for an
evaporator; Exhibit #12, correspondence from Steve Russell
summarizing business history; Exhibit #13, a letter from Washington
County Department of Health, Environment and Land Management
stating hazardous waste compliance history; Exhibit #14, a letter
signed by John Rheinberger; Exhibit #15, a letter from neighbor
Ronald Stephen Schoenecker; Exhibit #16, a letter from Kelly
Murten; Exhibit #17, a letter from Hazel E. Bonse; Exhibit #18, a
letter from the Town of St. Joseph stating approval with
conditions, Nelson read conditions from letter.
Chris and Laura Fischer, being duly sworn, stated they are from
Stillwater, Minnesota. Bradley asked the Fischers why they were
moving. Ms. Fischer stated they have always wanted to live in the
country. Mr. Fischer added that they have two children and need a
larger home.
Bradley asked the Fischers about the conditions imposed by St.
Joseph Township and asked for their response. Mr. Fischer stated
they are currently working under those similar conditions in
Stillwater. He added that business has been good and there will be
no traffic because they will pick up and deliver.
Ms. Fischer stated they have a 15 day turn around. She noted the
25' x 40' structure will match the house that is already there and
everything is contingent upon the approval of the business.
Mr. Fischer noted they strip once every two weeks which usually
lasts 2 to 6 hours. He said the most hazardous is the methane
chloride which is contained in a 3' x 5' tank. He said they only
use water based finishes which are applied by spraying and he
explained the evaporation process of the methane chloride and noted
that it has been approved by the DNR.
Mehls suggested that the Fischers contact the LEPC for fire
inspections, etc. as a requirement to this request.
Ms. Fischer stated that Dynex, a licensed hazardous waste disposal
company, picks up the drums once every two years. She noted the
only thing in the drum is basically paint sludge and the water is
not considered waste water and that is why they use the evaporator
system.
Bradley indicated that the Board would view the site and render a
decision.
The Board recessed at 10:10 a.m. and reconvened at 10:30 a.m.
Robert and Lilly Ann Hartmon
Nelson stated this was a request to construct a two family dwelling
which is not a permitted use, but rather permitted by a special
exception use permit. He noted the Hartmons wish to live in the
original residence while building the proposed home and then remove
that structure once the new home is completed. Nelson introduced
Exhibit #1, a site plan; Exhibit #2, a CSM; Exhibit #3, a building
plan showing the structure to be 62' long by 36' wide; Exhibit #4,
a brief narrative explaining their request; Exhibit #5, an order
laying out the Town highway created in February 1968; Exhibit #6,
a resolution by the Town Board stating the Hartmons will meet the
83' setback requirement and that the road is a Class E road;
Exhibit #7, a letter from the Town of St. Joseph stating their
approval (Nelson read the letter which noted the property to be
zoned ag.-residential).
Robert Hartmon, being duly sworn, stated his address to be 752
Crestview Trail, Hudson, Wisconsin and Gena Hartmon, daughter,
being duly sworn, stated her address to be 1091 County Road A,
Hudson, Wisconsin.
Bradley noted that the road ends in Hartmon's yard.
Ms. Hartmon stated there is a three acre minimum lot size
requirement and they were originally requesting a 69' setback from
the existing road, but the resolution from the Town of St. Joseph
cleared up that request.
Bradley asked Hartmon if he owned the land to Mound Drive. Ms
Hartmon stated no, they own a 16 acre triangle.
Jensen asked if it would be a problem to tear the house down within
one year. Ms. Hartmon stated it would not and they hoped to have
the duplex up by November and the house torn down or dismantled by
June 1, 1997.
Bradley asked the Hartmons if they would be moving the home. Ms.
Hartmon stated they would like to move it.
Bradley indicated that the Board would view the site and render a
decision.
Bruce and Patty Schultz
This application was postponed because applicant had not contacted
the township regarding this request.
Ernest E. Gustafson/Ken and Barb Zak
Nelson stated this was a request for a commercial mini storage on
property in Houlton which is currently zoned commercial. Nelson
noted that this is not a permitted use, but rather permitted by a
special exception use permit. Nelson introduced Exhibit #1, a
State approved building plan of the mini storage structure showing
the dimensions to be 40' wide x 140' long with the west side having
six bays (roughly measuring 919" long x 5' wide), the north side
having 11 bays (six being 9' x 7' and five being 10' x 20' ) and the
south side having 12 bays (six being 10' x 30' and seven being 10'
x 201), the plan also identified a 20' x 20' heated office in the
northeast corner; Exhibit #2, a topographical map showing relief of
the property; Exhibit #3, a Quit Claim Deed subject to a non-
exclusive easement, Nelson read the deed noting the building lying
just south of the easement; Exhibit #4, a brief narrative of
intended use of property.
Nelson stated he has spoken with the Zaks about township approval
and they said the township would not approve their request until
the Board does.
Ken and Barb Zak, being duly sworn, stated their address to be 1019
Webster Street, Hudson, Wisconsin.
Bradley noted the Board insists on black top surfacing.
Mr. Zak stated he met with the town of St. Joseph twice and will be
meeting with them again on July 10th and llth. He said that he has
spoken with the neighbors and they have no objections. He added he
has been a resident of Hudson for 11 years and ownership of the
property is contingent upon obtaining a building permit.
Ms. Zak stated the Town was concerned that the Board of Adjustment
had more information on this request than they did so they were
hesitant about making a final decision. Nelson noted his concern
with the townships lack of making a decision.
Mehls asked if there would be security lighting. Mr. Zak stated
there would be hard surface, lighting and berm for Highway 64. He
noted his major to be in horticulture.
Mehls asked if there would be any retail sales. Mr. Zak stated no.
He said his contract with renters reserves the right for him to
inspect his storage facility.
Bradley asked how many buildings would be erected. Mr. Zak stated
he wanted to put all the plans on the table so the Board would be
aware of their future intentions.
Nelson asked about the hours of operation. Ms. Zak stated 9 to 5.
Bradley inquired about the housing of business. Mr. Zak stated
they have a truck which needs to be stored in a heated garage and
a stall will be used for that.
Bradley indicated that the Board would view the site and render a
decision.
Bomaz, Inc./Bob and Greg Zwald
Nelson stated this was a special exception use request to exceed
the number of animal units per acre and noted 1,000 lbs. to be
considered one animal unit. He said the Zwalds need to come up
with a plan for waste.
Nelson introduce Exhibit #1, a site plan identifying the proposed
structure of the building; Exhibit #2, two pages detailing the site
plan; Exhibit #3, four aerial photos of property which is to be
entered into a lease agreement; Exhibit #4, a tax roll lease
agreement; Exhibit #5, correspondence from the Town of Pleasant
Valley stating their approval.
Greg Zwald, being duly sworn, stated his address to be 1609 County
Road Z, Hammond, Wisconsin and Bob Zwald, being duly sworn, stated
his address to be 1603 County Road Z, Hammond, Wisconsin. They
noted they were brothers.
Bob Zwald stated he abstained from the Town of Pleasant Valley vote
on their request.
Bradley inquired about the site for this request. Greg stated he
wants to get going with their contractors because they are on a
time table. He noted they have already moved a lot of dirt.
Bradley asked if they had a long-term lease with their parents.
Greg stated yes. He said the family corporation owns 160 acres and
his parents own 300 acres independently of the corporation and that
the corporation was created in 1974. Greg stated they rent 300
acres and have 475 acres which is tillable.
Greg stated they have 400 head of cattle which consists of milking
and dry animals. They have 100 cows as well as dry cows and they
are currently renting a portion of their herd to neighbors. Bob
stated they intend to add 300 cows to their current 100 cows.
Greg stated they have a 590 manure nutrient management plan.
Bradley asked if they plan on using manure pit tankers. Bob stated
they want to use tankers, but want to remain flexible to change so
they can remain competitive. Greg referred to Schottler's plan and
their options for manure management.
Bob stated they want to work with their neighbors and what they are
requesting is not a drastic change from what they are already doing
it is just on a larger scale. He noted that the dry cows would be
housed at the old site and the milk cows would be in the new
building.
Bradley asked if they had received complaints from neighbors
regarding odor, etc. Greg stated liquid manure systems which flush
out into fields create a lot of odor. He said what they would be
doing is scrapping the manure into an alley collection which would
be gravity flowed to an outdoor storage where it will crust over
and then two times a year they would agitate and mix it to get it
to the field at which time it will create an odor.
Bradley asked how often they scrape into the alley collection.
Greg stated they scrape three times a day and store it in the
center of the grate. Bob noted they scrape to keep ahead of freeze
UPS.
Greg addressed the issue of property values decreasing because of
the odor, etc. Bob added that they have done a lot of planning,
have hired an engineer and are trying to incorporate the best plans
possible. He feels there can be a symbiosis with agriculture and
housing development. Greg noted the manure pit will be to the
north and downhill 250 feet.
Bradley indicated that the Board would view the site and render a
decision.
Lon and Brigitte Feia
Nelson stated this was a request for variance to a driveway
separation. Nelson noted the ordinance requires a minimum of 200'
separation from center to center. He said the applicant must prove
a hardship.
Nelson introduced Exhibit #1, a site plan of the proposed driveway
identifying where the town road ends and their request of a 55'
variance; Exhibit #2, a plat map showing where the property is
located; Exhibit #3, correspondence from the Town of Warren stating
no one may build within 133' from the south line of the property.
Lon Feia, being duly sworn, stated his address to be 414 Brookwood
Drive, Hudson, Wisconsin.
Bradley asked if the property was the James Fogerty Farm. Feia
stated 160 acres is Fogerty's and he purchased 40 acres to the west
of the dead end road and has an easement to the town road. Feia
noted he raises ostriches.
Bradley asked Feia how long he has owned the property. Feia stated
he purchased 40 acres last October. He noted he did not know he
needed a variance for a driveway and mentioned they had started
construction.
Bradley indicated that the Board would view the site and render a.
decision.
John Mortel/M & M Storage, Inc.
Nelson stated this was a request for a commercial mini storage
which is allowed by a special exception use permit in a commercial
district. Nelson introduced Exhibit #1, a brief description of
their proposal; Exhibit #2, a site plan of the property identifying
the proposed building (30' x 3301) and future plans of building to
the west of the initial proposed building; Exhibit #3, rules and
regulations; Exhibit #4, building plans, not for the building being
proposed, but for ones that were approved several years ago;
Exhibit #5, correspondence from the Town of Baldwin approving
rezoning from ag.-residential to commercial, a variance setback
request and the special exception request for a mini -storage
building.
John Mortel, being duly sworn, stated his address to be 994 - 230th
Street, Baldwin, Wisconsin. Mortel noted he is one of the owners
of M & M Storage which is a growing business.
Bradley asked Mortel how they charge rent. Mortel stated they
charge .25 per square foot per month, e.g. a 10' x 20' car garage
would cost $50/month.
Bradley stated he thought Baldwin to be zoned exclusive ag. Nelson
clarified, stating it was ag.-residential.
Bradley asked if access was computerized. Mortel stated they will
have a security fence.
Menter asked if the unit would be built within a year. Mortel
stated yes.
Bradley asked the location in relation to Highway 12. Mortel
stated it would be south of 12 and the legion building and %Z mile
on 220th Street.
Bradley indicated that the Board would view the site and render a
decision.
George and Emily Vondriska
Nelson stated this was a request for a home occupation cabinet shop
which is permitted by a special exception use permit. Nelson
introduced Exhibit #1, a site plan identifying the location of the
shop in relation to the house and lot lines; Exhibit #2,
correspondence from the Town of Warren, Nelson read the letter of
approval; Exhibit #3, Town of Warren Resolution regarding Vondriska
request; Exhibit #4, a brief description of the proposed operation.
George and Emily Vondriska, being duly sworn, stated their address
to be 924 County Road N, Hudson, Wisconsin.
Bradley asked how long the Vondriskas have owned the property.
Vondriska stated they have owned it since October of last year.
Bradley inquired about Vondriska's class instruction. Nelson
assured the Board that this is included as part of a home
occupation. Vondriska stated he has a following of students who
take his courses and some of them are from Anderson's.
Mehls asked about solvents and storage of same. Vondriska stated
all products leave his classes unfinished and the materials used
are stored in flammable proof cabinets.
Bradley asked Vondriska his response to the Warren resolution.
Vondriska stated the resolution contains most of the verbal
information he gave to the township.
Bradley asked Vondriska why he chose Warren Township. Vondriska
stated because of the proximity of Anderson's, he wants to be at
home to raise his children and they own 22 acres and enjoy being at
home.
Bradley indicated that the Board would view the site and render a
decision.
Roger and Dorene German
Nelson stated this was a request for a special exception use permit
for an auto salvage operation.
Bradley noted this was a rehearing and as per Greg Timmerman this
application is to be treated as if it were a new hearing. Bradley
asked Todryk of his interpretation of treating this as a new
hearing. Todryk stated he was unaware that this was a new trial.
Nelson questioned the exhibits to enter. Todryk stated he wants
the exhibits from the previous hearing to be used.
Nelson introduced Exhibit #1, four photos of the property; Exhibit
#2, a State permit for a salvage yard; Exhibit #3, a Certificate of
Continuing Education for air conditioning mobile unit; Exhibit #4,
correspondence from the Town of Rush River dated June 22, 1996
stating support of the German application; Exhibit #5,
correspondence from Rick and Pam Walton supporting request; Exhibit
#6, correspondence from Robert Hanson supporting request; Exhibit
#7, correspondence from Barb and Mark Neeber stating no objection;
Exhibit #8, correspondence from Ronald Moe stating German is an
asset to the community; Exhibit #9, two -page correspondence from
Maloy Moniken, first page is a letter of support and the second
page is a letter to the Rush River homeowners from Heather Landin;
Exhibit #10, correspondence from Richard Walton supporting request;
Exhibit #11, correspondence from Connie and Bill Juen supporting
request; Exhibit #12, a two -page letter from Lloyd Weber supporting
application; Exhibit #13, a letter from Gladys Pederson supporting
request; Exhibit #14, correspondence from Orin Ylvisaker supporting
application; Exhibit #15, a petition received by Zoning Office on
November 20, 1995 entitled "No Junkyard Businesses Petition"
opposing the junkyard, it was noted there were 36 Rush River
Township resident signatures.
Roger German, being duly sworn, stated he obtained a state license
in January of 1996 and in order to get this license he had to show
$115,000 in assets. German noted that a gentleman from the
Department of Natural Resources Waste Management division, sent by
Alice Clausing's office, checked over the property for anti -freeze
spills and other possible ground contaminations and could find
nothing wrong. German said he was to receive a copy of a letter
stating the findings by this gentleman. A printed business card
from Loren A. Brumberg, Waste Management Specialist with the
Wisconsin DNR was presented as Exhibit #16.
Bradley asked German why it took him so long to get his license.
German stated he had a stack of paperwork to file and send in.
Jensen asked Nelson if he had been out to inspect this property.
Nelson stated yes he had and suggested German paint the fence.
Presented as Exhibit #17, a letter from Eric Macbeth stating
opposition to application.
Bradley asked German if he believed he was running a proper salvage
yard. German stated yes. Bradley recalled that the Board had
viewed the site in September. German agreed. Bradley inquired
about the damage to the fence. German stated the wind had blown it
over.
Bradley asked German if he was aware of the petition against his
salvage yard and if he knew MacBeth. German stated no. Bradley
referred to the Macbeth letter addressed to Heather Landin which
stated German to have an "in -your -face attitude". Bradley asked
German what his reaction was to this accusation. German said he
does not have an in -your -face attitude.
Bradley asked German how much property he owned. German stated he
owns 8.5 acres.
Todryk stated this township is primarily agricultural with ag.-
residential pockets and in most townships this use would not be
permitted.
Lloyd Weber, being duly sworn, stated his address to be 323 - 192nd
Street, Baldwin, Wisconsin. Weber said he is an officer on the
Rush River Town Board. He said the Town of Rush River supports
this request, feels they have scrutinized this issue and the
majority of residents don't care one way or the other. Weber asked
to see the petition.
Bradley asked if there were three members who served on the Rush
River Town Board. Weber stated yes.
Weber stated he wanted to challenge the information presented in
opposition to German. He also addressed the issue of hot rodding
trucks coming and going. Weber believed this to be a case of
character assassination. Weber noted the German property does not
slope to the Rush River as presented in the earlier case.
Bradley asked Weber about property values. Weber stated this issue
could be argued to death and it is a different case to different
people. Bradley asked if they discussed this matter with the
assessor at the one day open book. Weber stated yes, and that the
assessor didn't feel it would affect the value and that this is
something that cannot be nailed down. Weber noted the value of the
German property has increased.
Mehls asked Weber about his concern regarding the petition. Weber
said they have asked to see this petition, but none has ever been
presented to them.
Bradley asked Weber if there have been meetings held at the Rush
River Town Hall regarding the German issue. Weber stated yes. He
said they had to hold a second meeting because the first meeting
was not properly noticed and most of the people in attendance were
in favor.
Mehls asked Weber if he knew MacBeth. Weber stated no, but he has
heard the name.
Todryk asked Weber if he or the assessor could pin down what effect
this would have on property value. Weber stated no, it is hard to
pin point what effect any type of business would have on property
values.
Menter questioned the illegal moving of business to area as was
written in the petition.
Phil Todryk, being duly sworn, stated he is the attorney
representing Heather Landin in this matter. Heather Landin, being
duly sworn, stated her address to be 298 - 190th Street, Baldwin,
Wisconsin and a resident of Rush River.
Bradley asked Todryk about the preparation of the petition against
the Germans. Todryk stated it was not done by him, but by Landin.
Todryk asked Landin if this salvage yard was a concern. Landin
stated it was and that this operation effects property values.
Todryk asked Landin if the Town Board had approved German's
request. Landin stated yes.
Todryk asked if there had been an open meeting violation in that
the meeting was not properly published and asked her if she had
attended that meeting. Landin stated yes. Todryk asked if the
second meeting had been properly noticed. Landin stated yes and
estimated that 40 or more people were in attendance with a 50/50
support/object ratio. Todryk referred to Exhibit #15, a petition
with signatures showing objection to the junkyard.
Bradley asked Landin if she drew up the petition. Landin stated
yes and that it was a joint effort with Gene Nelson, Mary Sesner
and Scott Larson. Todryk asked Landin to read Exhibit #15.
Todryk asked Landin if she believed they moved their operation in
illegally. Landin stated yes. Todryk asked her if this caused
concern. Landin stated yes. Todryk asked if she thought this
would have an effect on property value. Landin stated she has been
in contact with the Westconsin Credit Union and they said it would
have a specific impact on land values. She said she also contacted
an assessor and he agreed that this would affect value as well.
Landin went on to state that incompatible uses make banks give a
lower assessed value and that banks are extremely concerned about
environmental pollution. Environment becomes a big issue when you
try to sell your home because banks are very conservative about
issuing mortgages for homes near these types of operations.
Landin ,stated when exclusive ag zoning came into place in Rush
River the township allowed certain tax breaks. Todryk, reading
from Exhibit #15, noted that 800 of the land in Rush River is zoned
agriculture.
Todryk asked about remodeling improvements done by the Hansons.
Landin stated they added a septic system which should increase the
value of the property. Todryk asked what the reason for the mound
was and what effect groundwater had on this. Landin stated seepage
into the ground probably played a part in this replacement.
Todryk asked Landin if it was time consuming to obtain signatures.
Landin stated yes and she said she was unable to get the signatures
to the township.
Nelson presented Exhibit #18, the old petition of signatures which
was presented to the Town Board.
Bradley asked Landin her interpretation of the German property
value increase. Landin stated the German house was dilapidated
before they purchased it, but it is looking nice.
Mehls questioned if the DNR has any influence on potential
pollution. Landin stated she submitted a report to our office.
Mehls asked Landin if she knew who contacted the gentleman from the
state. Landin stated she contacted Senator Clausing's office
because she felt inspections needed to take place. Todryk noted
that the Germans have only a DOT license which regulates some
activities and states that he operates a salvage yard. Todryk
feels German should meet all other licenses as well. Todryk asked
that the Board revoke German's permit and not grant a special
exception permit. Todryk stated that the Germans should not be
operating there in the first place because of the ag-residential
pocket zoning.
The Board recessed at 1:02 p.m. and reconvened at 1:10 p.m.
Allen J. Carnine, being duly sworn, stated he is a certified
general real estate appraiser with his main office in Deer Park and
has worked in St. Croix County since 1976. Carnine said he
inspected the 151 acres of the Landin property and noted that it
drains to the Rush River. He stated her land is open with a creek
running through it and has a very attractive view. Carnine
believes that a rural residential use would be the "highest and
best use" of the land. Carnine elaborated that "highest and best
use" is a term which is used in the appraisal business and means
that the probable use of a property is a use that would give the
highest return.
Todryk asked Carnine if the Landin property was suitable for
farming. Carnine stated it was poor and presented a page from a
St. Croix County Soil book; this was labeled as Exhibit #19.
Carnine drew in the Landin property in pink and notched in the
German property in the corner. Todryk asked Carnine if the German
property drained into the Landin property. Carnine stated land has
to drain somewhere and noted that soil in this area is sporadic and
would require a mound system.
Todryk asked Carnine the marketability of the property. Carnine
stated it was very strong and close to I-94.
Todryk asked Carnine's opinion on the effect an auto salvage yard
would have on Landin's property. Carnine stated it should show a
decrease in value because of the operation. Todryk asked if he
attributed the decrease in property value to the salvage yard
operation. Carnine stated the visual aspects of it affect the
value: if the Landin property is divided one would have to deal
with the view of the fence and if three parcels were created one
would have to view the site of the yard.
Carnine noted he is an ex -banker and the possibility of pollution
would scrutinize giving a loan making it difficult to get long-term
financing which in turn affects marketability. Todryk asked if the
perception of pollution would affect what a potential buyer might
pay. Carnine stated yes, it would make marketability difficult.
Todryk read Section 17.14 (1) (b) of the zoning ordinance
pertaining to permitted uses in an agricultural zoned district
for a single family dwelling. Carnine agreed the highest and best
use for Landin's 150 acres would be for a single family dwelling.
Bradley asked Carnine to clarify his title as an appraiser and not
an assessor. Carnine stated he is an appraiser and real estate
broker.
Bradley asked Carnine what his reaction was to Weber' s statement on
German's property value increase. Carnine believed this to be
true, but Landin's property would be negatively affected. Carnine
stated a "holding period" is an effect this yard has on Landin's
property as well as obtaining financing.
Carnine stated he is cautious. He has contacted other appraisers
and bankers and said they all have the same basic response that it
has to affect marketability.
Bradley asked Carnine how recently he was contacted. Carnine
stated 10 days ago.
Todryk asked if the negative impact on the land decreases property
value the longer the operation is in effect. Carnine stated yes,
they would look at how long the operation was there and what it
would take to clean it up. Todryk asked if the Germans cleaned up
their property would the Landin's property value increase. Carnine
stated yes.
Todryk addressed the difference between an assessor and an
appraiser. An assessor is one who does a blanket appraisal,
determining value in a mass form or an exterior view, and an
appraiser goes through everything and is much more accurate.
Bradley asked Carnine if he did a "windshield" appraisal. Carnine
stated no, he viewed the property and the home.
Mehls asked if there was an impact radius and if it increased or
decreased at a certain point. Carnine stated it does to a point
and agricultural land is not as desirable or as valuable as in the
past, but the demand is there for land.
Gene Nelson, being duly sworn, stated his address to be 59 County
Road Y, Baldwin, Wisconsin and noted he was a former member of the
Town Board (194).
Todryk, referring to Exhibit #15, asked Gene if he was involved in
the petition presented to the Rush River Town Board. Gene stated
yes. Todryk asked Gene if he was a town resident and opposed to
the application. Gene stated he has lived in Rush River all his
life, he is opposed to the salvage yard and feels it will have a
negative impact on property values. Todryk asked Gene if he feels
the zoning ordinance has had an effective impact on enforcing the
junk ordinance. Gene stated no and the board at the time did not
want to do anything about it. Todryk asked if the Town of Rush
River had done anything to increase their enforcement on junk in
the township. Gene stated no.
Bradley stated Gene was opposed to the Doornink operation as well.
Gene agreed he was opposed and still is. He is concerned about
ground water pollution. Bradley asked him if he believed that
property values suffered. Gene stated yes, to the close neighbors.
Mehls opined that the tax burden was broadened because of the
Doornink business. Gene agreed that it was.
Gene reiterated, as a property owner in Rush River Township, he
feels this operation will have a long term effect on property
value.
Bradley stated it is difficult to get salvage operations into
compliance. Gene agreed.
Todryk asked Gene if he knew the signatures on Exhibit #15 to be
Rush River residents. Gene stated yes.
Edward Landin, being duly sworn, stated he is the Planning/Zoning
Administrator for Cook County in Minnesota.
Todryk stated the possibility of pollution will have a negative
effect. Mr. Landin stated people need an assurance of confidence
and consistency of the zoning enforcement; otherwise they will lose
faith.
Todryk, referring to Exhibit #17 (Eric Macbeth letter), asked Mr.
Landin if he believed this to have an impact. Mr. Landin stated
yes it does have an impact. He said he agrees with the aesthetics
issues and that this operation doesn't belong in this community.
Bradley asked Mr. Landin if he was offended by the yard. Mr.
Landin stated yes and that he could empathize with his daughter.
Bradley noted there are people who are in support of this yard.
Scott Larson, being duly sworn, stated he is a Rush River resident
and his concern about the zoning integrity of the township.
Larson then presented several letters of opposition which were
labeled as follows: Exhibit #20, a letter from Hazel Stinson;
Exhibit #21, a letter from Richard Dahlke; Exhibit #22, a letter
from Lissa List; Exhibit #23, a letter from Lola Giove.
Larson stated he lives southeast of the German property on Y and
feels this special exception is not an appropriate use for this
area. He said this will have a negative impact on property values
and as he has done extensive remodeling to his home, he feels his
investment is at stake.
Bradley asked Larson what the assessed value of his home was.
Larson stated $100,000. Larson said he has environmental, physical
and aesthetics concerns with this site. He feels this type of
operation doesn't fit in with the rest of the environment and noted
there is a large number of people with the same concern and
opposition. He feels a commercial district would be more suitable
for this type of operation.
Bradley noted that the idea for donation of land gives merit.
Larson stated he feels a compromise can be reached.
Todryk mentioned an impact on the broader community and asked
Larson if he felt less secure in his property. Larson stated
definitely, he thinks this could set a precedent and doesn't want
it to be taken lightly. Larson noted that Pleasant Valley Township
is protective of its community from salvage yards.
Todryk noted there were 97 signatures on Exhibit #15.
Tom Nelson, being duly sworn, stated he is the Zoning Administrator
for St. Croix County.
Todryk questioned the enforcement of this special exception use
permit. Nelson stated he had visited the site two times spending
about 10 minutes on each occasion. Todryk asked if man ower was a
factor in the number of visits to this site. Nelson stated yes.
Todryk asked how much manpower the zoning office had. Nelson
stated himself and two assistants. Todryk asked if it would
require more time to effectively enforce all the conditions of this
permit. Nelson stated yes. Todryk inquired on other applications
and enforcement requirements. Nelson stated more critical
applications require more time and less critical applications
require less time.
Bradley asked Nelson when he had visited the site. Nelson stated
he visited the site after the permanent granting of the permit. He
noted his assistant was at one.
Todryk asked German, previously sworn, when he purchased the
property. German stated in 1991.
Todryk asked if there was a lot of junk on the property and if he
cleaned it up. German stated there was a lot of junk and he
cleaned it all up.
Todryk asked German how much he spent on his new garage, pole shed
and addition to his house. German stated he invested $12,000 in
the garage, about $8,500 on the pole shed and about $16,000 on the
new addition.
Todryk asked how big the addition was. German stated it was 20' x
24' (kitchen, laundry and bath). Todryk inquired about other
improvements. German stated he has done wiring, plumbing and
installed a new mound system which cost $9,500. Todryk noted the
total value of German's improvements to equal $46,000.
Bradley asked German if he had to secure a bond. German stated he
had to show proof of financial stability.
Bradley questioned the legality of the operation. German stated he
has owned the property since 1991.
Weber, previously sworn, stated the farmers in the community are
supporting the Germans. He noted that the farmers accumulate a lot
of junk and feel that German is providing a service. Weber
questioned what would happen to property values if this type of
service were not available.
Todryk summarized his legal argument stating that special
exceptions should only be granted in extreme cases and should not
adversely affect property values. Todryk feels they have proven
this operation will affect land values.
Bradley indicated the Board would view the site and render a
decision.
David James Meister
Nelson stated this was a request for a setback variance from a
county road. David James Meister, being duly sworn, stated his
address to be 1357 County Road A, New Richmond, Wisconsin.
Nelson introduced Exhibit #1, a site plan identifying the new
proposed building with a deck and showing the old building to be
20' from County Road A, the old building measuring 50' long with an
8' separation between the old building and the new building (60' x
281); Exhibit #2, a map of Boardman; Exhibit #3, correspondence
from the Town of Richmond recommending approval. Nelson stated
that this doesn't meet the 133' setback requirement because it is
not a conforming structure.
Bradley asked Nelson if he supported this application. Nelson
stated yes, only because the addition is to the back side of the
structure. Nelson noted this is a corner lot and cannot meet the
setback averaging.
Bradley noted that precedence is in Meister's favor.
Meister stated he is adding a banquet room for meetings, birthday
parties, etc. Nelson noted this request is of a commercial nature.
Meister stated he wants to put a full basement underneath.
Bradley asked Meister how long he has owned the bar. Meister
stated five years in August.
Nelson noted the well on the property needed abandonment. Meister
noted the underground system was all concrete.
Bradley asked Meister if he wanted to expand his business. Meister
stated yes.
Jensen inquired about parking. Meister said if he needed more he
would get rid of his volleyball courts.
Bradley indicated that the Board would view the site and render a
decision.
The Board recessed at 3:00 p.m. to view the sites.
DECISIONS:
Jeff Lauck/Tim & Judy Dove
Motion by Mehls, second by Menter to conditionally approve their
special exception use request for a battery storage facility. The
following conditions were noted: Applicant is to show proof of
sufficient insurance and provide copies of same to the Town of
Somerset as well as the County; black top all areas which service
the public and employees; meet all county, state and federal
regulations/licensing required for this operation; follow plans as
submitted. The following vote was taken: Mehls, yes; Menter, yes;
Jensen, yes; Bradley, yes. Motion to conditionally approve
carried.
John Murtha/Don Jackelen
Motion by Jensen, second by Menter to conditionally approve request
for a body shop and used car sales. The following conditions were
noted: completion of hard surface; junk and dump boxes must be
removed; adequate screening must be provided to screen items stored
outside; applicant must follow all environmental regulations. The
following vote was taken: Mehls, yes; Jensen, yes; Menter, yes;
Bradley, yes. Motion to conditionally approve carried.
William Derrick
Motion by Bradley, second by Mehls, to approve request for
extension of nonmetallic mining permit. The extension is approved
for four (4) years. The following vote was taken: Mehls, yes;
Jensen, yes; Menter, yes; Bradley, yes. Motion to approve carried.
Jeffrey Egan
Motion by Jensen, second by Menter to conditionally approve request
for a home occupation for a woodworking shop. The following
conditions were noted: permit for construction expires one year
from date of decision; adhere to hours of operation as specified in
request; hazardous materials, glues, solvents, etc. to be stored in
fireproof containers - 15 gallon maximum; there is to be no
expansion of activity. The following vote was taken: Jensen, yes;
Menter, yes; Mehls, yes; Bradley, yes. Motion to conditionally
approve carried.
Glen Boldt
Motion by Jensen, second by Menter to approve request for filling,
grading and riprapping along the shore of Pine Lake. The following
vote was taken: Jensen, yes; Mehls, yes; Menter, yes; Bradley,
yes. Motion to approve carried.
Brenda Peterson/Chris and Laura Fischer
Motion by Menter, second by Jensen to conditionally approve request
for a home occupation for a furniture repair business. The
following conditions were noted: Applicant is to follow
stipulations as stated in Town of St. Joseph recommendation letter.
The following vote was taken: Mehls, yes; Menter, yes; Jensen,
yes; Bradley, yes. Motion to conditionally approve carried.
Robert and Lilly Ann Hartmon
Motion by Jensen, second by Menter to conditionally approve request
for construction of a two family dwelling. The following
conditions were noted: Applicant is to meet all one and two family
dwelling codes; old building is to be torn down or removed within
one year from date of decision. The following vote was taken:
Jensen, yes; Mehls, yes; Menter, yes; Bradley, yes. Motion to
conditionally approve carried.
Bruce and Patty Schultz
No decision made. Applicant has not appeared before the township
regarding their request.
Ernest E. Gustafson/Ken and Barb Zak
Motion by Bradley, second by Jensen to postpone. Applicant is to
obtain township approval. Motion to postponed carried.
Bomaz, Inc./Bob and Greg Zwald
Motion by Bradley, second by Jensen to conditionally approve
request for a special exception use permit to exceed the number of
animal units per acre. The following conditions were noted: 590
Plan to be submitted to Land Conservation Office and Zoning Office
and an Animal Waste Permit obtained; permit valid for long-term
lease property. The following vote was taken: Mehls, yes; Jensen,
yes; Menter, yes; Bradley, yes. Motion to conditionally approve
carried.
Lon and Brigette Feia
Motion by Mehls, second by Menter to approve request for a variance
to a driveway separation. The following vote was taken: Jensen,
yes; Mehls, yes; Menter, yes; Bradley, yes. Motion to approve
carried.
John Mortel/M & M Storage, Inc.
Motion by Jensen, second by Menter to conditionally approve request
for a commercial mini storage. The following conditions were
noted: complete plans to be submitted to the Zoning Office; areas
servicing the public to be of hard surface; setback request is
denied. The following vote was taken: Mehls, yes; Menter, yes;
Jensen, yes; Bradley, yes. Motion to conditionally approve
carried.
George and Emily Vondriska
Motion by Menter, second by Bradley to conditionally approve
request for a home occupation cabinet shop. The following
conditions were noted: fire control safety measures to be
implemented with an exit route to be established. The following
vote was taken: Jensen, yes; Mehls, yes; Menter, yes; Bradley,
yes. Motion to conditionally approve carried.
Roger and Dorene German
Motion by Bradley, second by Jensen to conditionally approve
request for an auto salvage operation. The following conditions
were noted: applicant must clearly identify a method of disposing
of tires, listing sources of disposal and written agreements by
sources and submit them to the Zoning Office; the applicant must
clearly identify a method of disposing of solvents, listing sources
of disposal and written agreements by sources and submit them to
the Zoning Office; the Zoning Office has the right to inspect the
property at any time; the salvage items are to be neatly stored
within the fenced area; fence is to be painted an earth tone color
by September 1, 1996; the facility must be code compliant with all
State and County regulations; all containers for waste liquids are
to be labeled and used to store only the material on the label; the
area of screening is to be maintained as built within the property
boundaries; contract agreements are to be signed by the applicant
and any contractor for removal and disposal of solvents, freon, oil
and batteries; the applicant can have no more than 40 junk vehicles
on the premises at any time; the applicant is to establish a
headquarter building; the applicant must meet all conditions
imposed. The following vote was taken: Mehls, yes; Menter, yes;
Jensen, yes; Bradley, yes. Motion to conditionally approve
carried. -
David James Meister
Motion by Mehls, second by Jensen to conditionally approve request
for a setback variance from a county road. The following
conditions were noted: applicant to black top areas which service
the public and employees; meet all State regulations for food and
health codes; follow plans as submitted. The following vote was
taken: Menter, yes; Jensen, yes; Mehls, yes; Bradley, yes. Motion
to conditionally approve carried.
Respectfully submitted:
WJ�WWLCUMII—
Jeome: eumann, Secretary
in