Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutBoard of Adjustment 11-26-97TOs LOCATION: 'AGENDA ST. CROIX COUNTY NOTICE OF COMMITTEE MEETING Robert M. Boche, Chas.rman St. Croix County. Board;' John Bradley, Chairman o 144 SIt :Croix County Soard of Adjustment Wednesday, November`26, 1997 8.30 a.mi Government Center, Hudson,. Wisconsin CALL ;= TO ORDER :? ROLL -"CALL :. ADOPTION OF -AGENDA: ACTION ON PREVIOUS MINiJTES* DATE`OF"NEXT MEETING: CORPORATION 'COUNSEL.REPORT: UPDATE ON VIOLATIONS AND LITIGATION: UNFINISHED BUSINESS: OLD BUSINESS: Richard Ohlfs Levques"Tower. Request for extension 1) Lowell Rivard on Special Exception Permit: -'Addition to building Viewing of clear cutting along the Kinnickinnic NEW BUSINESS: O THER: See Attachment ANNOUNCEMENTS AND CORRESPONDENCE: POSSIBLE AGENDA ITEMS FOR NEXT MEETING: ADJOURNMENT: (agenda not necessarily presented in this order) SUBMITTED BY: DATE:O COPIES TO: *CANCELLATIONS/ St. Croix County Zoning Office November 13, 1997 County Board Office Committee Members S/ADDITIONS County Clerk News Media/Notice Board PUBLIC HEARING The St. Croix County Board of Adjustment has scheduled a public hearing for Wednesday, November 26, 1997 at 8:30 a.m. at the Government Center, 1101 Carmichael Road, Hudson, Wisconsin, to consider the following appeals to the St. Croix County Zoning Ordinance. An on -site investigation will be made of each site in question, after which the board will return for the purpose of deliberating and voting on the appeals. 1. ARTICLE: *CANCELED* 17.29 (2) (a) and. 17.29 (2) (c) 3 Restrictions on filling and Grading APPELLANT: Roger N. Schwartz LOCATION: Located in the NW1/4 of the SE1/4 of Section 36.1 T30N-R17W, Town of Erin Prairie 2 ARTICLE: 17.15.5 (6)(b) Special Exception for a Major Home. -Occupation APPELLANT: Laurey Krear, Ralph and Patricia Gavic LOCATION:. Located in the NW 1/4 of the NW 1/4 of Section 26, T28N-R17W, Town of Rush River 3. ARTICLE: :*:C:jiijCELED* 7.85(2)(b)2 Wireless Communication Faci sties APPELLANT: Dan and Jacque Nelson,David W. Larson LOCATION: Located in NE 1/4 of the NE 1/4 of Section 4, T28N-R18W, Town of Kinnickinnic 4. ARTICLE: 17.64 (1) (b) 2 Variance to Centerline of Highway Setback APPELLANT: James H..and Mildred McDermott LOCATION: Located in the S 1/2 of the NW 1/4 of the SW 1/4 of Section 25, T31N-R19W,Town of Somerset 5. ARTICLE: 1764(a)3 Variance to Construct Access Driveway APPELLANT: Daniel Bracht, David and Christine Ostendorf LOCATION: Located in NE 1/4 of the NE 1/4of Section 20, T31N-R18W, Town of Star Prairie 6. ARTICLE: 17.29(2)(a) Filling and Grading in Shoreland District APPELLANT: Richard F. and Sheryl D. Lindholm LOCATION: Located in Gov. Lot 1 of Section 1, T28N-R20W, Town of Troy All interested.. persons are invited to attend said -hearing -and --be heard. Additional information may be obtained from the office of the St. Croix County Zoning Director, Hudson, Wisconsin at (715) 386-4680. John Bradley, Chairman St. Croix County Board of Adjustment e U TO: FROM: COMMITTEE TITLE: DATE: TIME: LOCATION: AGENDA ST. CROIX COUNTY NOTICE OF COMMITTEE MEETING Robert M. Boche, Chairman St. Croix County Board John Bradley, Chairman St. Croix County Board of Adjustment Wednesday, November 26, 1997 8:30 a.m. Government Center, Hudson, Wisconsin CALL TO ORDER: ROLL CALL: ADOPTION OF AGENDA: ACTION ON PREVIOUS MINUTES: DATE OF NEXT MEETING: CORPORATION COUNSEL REPORT: UPDATE ON VIOLATIONS AND LITIGATION: UNFINISHED BUSINESS: OLD BUSINESS: Richard Ohlfs Levques Tower Request for extension on Special 1) Lowell Rivard - Addition Exception Permit: to building Viewing of clear cutting along the Kinnickinnic NEW BUSINESS: See Attachment POSSIBLE AGENDA ITEMS FOR NEXT MEETING: ADJOURNMENT: (agenda not necessarily presented in this order) SUBMITTED BY: St. Croix County Zoning Office DATE: November 13, 1997 COPIES TO: County Board Office County Clerk Committee Members News Media/Notice Board *CANCELLATIONS/CHANGES/ADDITIONS PUBLIC HEARING The St. Croix County Board of Adjustment has scheduled a public hearing for Wednesday, November 26, 1997 at 8*30 a.m. at the Government Center, 1101 Carmichael Road, Hudson, Wisconsin, to consider the following appeals to the St. Croix County Zoning Ordinance. An on -site investigation will be made of each site in question, after which the board will return for the purpose of deliberating and voting on the appeals. 1. ARTICLE: 17.29 (2) (a) and 17.29 (2) (c) 3 Restrictions on filling and Grading APPELLANT: Roger N. Schwartz LOCATION: Located in the NW1/4 of the SE1/4 of Section 36, T30N-R17W, Town of Erin Prairie 2. ARTICLE: 17.155 (6) (b) Special Exception for a Major Home Occupation APPELLANT: Laurey Krear, Ralph and Patricia Gavic LOCATION: Located in the NW 1/4 of the NW 1/4 of Section 26, T28N-R17W, Town of Rush River 3. ARTICLE: *CANCELED*17.85(2)(b)2 Wireless Communication Facilities APPELLANT: Dan and Jacque Nelson,David W. Larson LOCATION: Located in NE 1/4 of the NE 1/4 of Section 4, T28N-R18W, Town of Kinnickinnic 4. ARTICLE: 17.64(1)(b)2 Variance to Centerline of Highway Setback APPELLANT: James H. and Mildred McDermott LOCATION: Located in the S 1/2 of the NW 1/4 of the SW 1/4 of Section 25, T31N-R19W,Town of Somerset 5. ARTICLE: 17.64(a)3 Variance to Construct Access Driveway APPELLANT: Daniel Bracht, David and Christine Ostendorf LOCATION: Located in NE 1/4 of the NE 1/4of Section 20, T31N-R18W, Town of Star Prairie 6. ARTICLE: 17.29(2)(a) Filling and Grading in Shoreland District APPELLANT: Richard F. and Sheryl D. Lindholm LOCATION: Located in Gov. Lot 1 of Section 1, T28N-R20W, Town of Troy - A11 interested persons are -invited -to -attend said -hearing -and be heard. Additional information may be obtained from the office of the St. Croix County Zoning Director, Hudson, Wisconsin at (715) 386-4680. John Bradley, Chairman St. Croix County Board of Adjustment BOARD OF ADJUSTMENTS MEETING AND HEARING Minutes November 26, 1997 his meeting was recorded by No, Court Reporters) The meeting was called to order by Chairman John Bradley at 8:30 a.m. A role call was made. Art Jensen, Nick Golz, Jerry Neumann, Tim Filipiak and Bradley were present. Chairman Bradley believes this to be a properly noticed meeting. Staff included: Jim Thompson, Zoning Specialist, Debbie Lenzen, Administrative Secretary, attorney Don Schwab, and new Zoning Director, Cindy Sherman. Motion by Filipiak, second by Golz to approve the agenda. Motion by Filipiak, second by Jensen to approve the October minutes. The Board set the next meeting date to be December 18, 1997. The starting time will be dependent on the number of applicants. CORPORATION COUNSEL REPORT/ UPDATE ON VIOLATIONS AND LITIGATION It was noted by Chairman Bradley that Greg Timmerman, Corporation Counsel, will be available today if needed. Gary Sukowatey Greg Timmerman and Jim Thompson have discussed what the next step is to be in this matter. They have discussed holding a revocation hearing. They will discuss with the new Zoning Director. John Bettendorf Chairman Bradley stated that the chain link fence on this property is not being put up. Timmerman explained that if there was not an appeal filed within 30 days of Decision date, Zoning will notify Bettendorf that he no longer has a permit for his business and would be in violation of the ordinance. The fine would be somewhere between $100.00 per day to $500.00 per day every day that he is in violation. James Meyer Chairman Bradley stated that this matter has been around for a long time. Jim Thompson stated that with the shortage of staff, he has not had time to get to it. He plans to address the problem by mid - December or the first part of 1998. Ronald Wohlers Timmerman explained that Wohlers was ordered by the court to move out of his home by tomorrow and has 90 days to remove the structure. If he does not do this, the county will take it into their hands. He was also fined $9,100.00. OLD BUSINESS Levgue Tower Charles LeVake, being duly sworn, stated that he was before the Board last month, and is part of the Levque Tower Company. He explained that the new transmission tower is to be put up in Houlton. He believes that some of the frequencies will cover all of St. Croix County. LeVake introduced the following exhibit: Exhibit 4: Site plan of the tower. The tower site was labeled "A". The nearest building was labeled "B". The tower is to be 196 feet tall. Thompson has been out to the property and told the Board that there is not a location on the property that would meet the 500 foot setback from the surrounding properties. He further stated that this property is not in the riverway district. There are currently three towers. These towers were labeled on Exhibit 4. Tower "B" is the tower that is coming down. Towers "C" and "D" are staying up. The lot owners house was labeled "E". LeVake showed the Board where the 12 foot trees would be located. The color for the tower will be grey. This color is allowed by the ordinance. LeVake stated that it is not possible to put a monopole on this site for the use intended. Filipiak asked if there was any opposition from neighbors. LeVake answered that there was very little. Jeff Nelson, being duly sworn, states that he is with W.W. Montgomery and Associates and is appearing today as an expert witness on telecommunication towers. He has been hired by St. Croix County as a consultant on this subject. Nelson gave a quick history of the landscape for towers in this area. He said that demand by consumers has caused the number of towers to increase. He explained that there are three towers on the site in Houlton. One of the towers was recently put up and is "loaded". Another of the towers needs repair and stated that the tower should be taken down and replaced as it cannot carry the load that is being put on it. This is the tower being proposed today. Nelson went on to explain that the location of the proposed site will serve St. Croix County and across the river. This is amulti-purpose coverage area and the site could serve eastern Minnesota and part of St. Croix County. Nelson further stated that the St. Croix River, during the summer months, is a very high communication area. Discussion held on use of the towers. LeVake and Nelson have met at the site and LeVake has been very cooperative with Nelson in supplying him with any information he has asked for. Nelson believes that they are taking reasonable steps on loading the towers and feels that they are doing the "right thing" to make the best use of the space on the property. He said that his application is driven by consumer demand and he believes this application is reasonable. Nelson went on to say that he believes that this is a good place for the tower and believes that these people have "done their homework" on this project. In discussing the design of the towers and their safety factors, Nelson stated that in 25 years in this business, he has never witnessed a properly maintained tower collapsing. The structures can withstand 2 hurricane level winds. The structural people that design these towers take this job very seriously and it is done properly. Nelson suggested that Zoning should request the tenants to supply a map showing the area to be covered on the tower. Thompson asked Nelson why the 500 foot setback from structures was put into the ordinance if these towers are designed to collapse in such a way that they would not "fall straight over". Nelson answered that he feels that when writing ordinances, committees need to be careful when setting setbacks. In some cases, a tower could be placed in an area more suitable for towers and would not necessarily be 500 feet from a structure. Ron Mielke, being duly sworn, states that he is with A T & T. He said that they are a tenant on an existing tower and would also be a tenant on the new tower. On Exhibit 4, "B" is their location. He explained that with the new tower being installed, this would upgrade the capacity of the tower, thus resulting in less towers. He reiterated that the need for these towers is customer driven. To his knowledge, several cellular companies and paging companies plan to use the proposed tower. Julie Townsend, being duly sworn, is with U.S. West, stated that they also plan to use the proposed tower. She said that the towers in Houlton are a good location. Lloyd Dahlke, being duly sworn, states that he is the Chairman for the Town of St. Joseph. He told the Board that the Town has wrestled with this tower issue also. They would like to see the new tower put in the same area as the old one. The Town has placed some conditions on the tower along with their approval. Dahlke stated that there was very little opposition by the neighboring landowners. Chairman Bradley asked the Zoning Office to look into coming up with a form to hand out to tower applicants relating to page 5 & 6 of the new Tower Ordinance. Jim Thompson introduced the following exhibits: Exhibit 1: Letter from the Town of St. Joseph approving the application. Exhibit 2: Minutes from the Town of St. Joseph dated November 6, 1997. Exhibit 3: Letter from Mrs. Wisner opposing the tower. Thompson read into record. Exhibit 4: Previously entered and is a map showing where the towers will be located. Clear cutting on the Kinnickinnic River Chairman Bradley stated that the Board has visited the site. Bradley then drafted a letter to Marty Engel stating that they are denying the blanket permit for clear cutting. The Board has reviewed the letter and it will be sent to Engel. Richard Ohlfs Richard Ohlfs, being duly sworn, stated that he was here two months ago and the decision was postponed and he was asked to return with a plan for his model train project. Ohlfs then explained that this is his hobby and he does not know what steps he will take or a time frame. The Board stated that they would like to see some kind of a plan, such as what he plans to do in the 3 next 2 to 4 years. The Board suggested that he come back before them in a few months when he has a plan put together. The Board will make a Decision later today. Lowell Rivard Lowell Rivard, being duly sworn, states that he would like an extension of a permit he received a year ago. He received a permit to add a showroom onto his building, but has not gotten the project started. He may add this showroom sometime in 1999, but plans to put in the new septic this year for additional bathrooms. The distance is 316 feet from the center of the road to the corner of the building. Jim Thompson introduced the following exhibits: Exhibit 1: Original Decision dated December 2, 1996. Exhibit 2: Letter from Lowell Rivard Exhibit 3: Fax from Terry Pederson, Wisconsin Department of Transportation, stating no objection to the permit. According to site plan, Rivard's building meets all required setbacks. The Board will make a Decision later today. The Board recessed for 10 minutes. NEW BUSINESS Chairman Bradley welcomed everyone in attendance Cl"d gave a brief overview of how the Board of Adjustment meeting is conducted. Attorney Don Schwab read the notice of the hearing as published: PUBLIC HEARING The St. Croix County Board of Adjustment has scheduled a public hearing for Wednesday, November 26, 1997 at 8:30 a.m. at the Government Center, 1101 Carmichael Road, Hudson, Wisconsin, to consider the following appeals to the St. Croix County Zoning Ordinance. An on - site investigation will be made of each site in question, after which the board will return for the purpose of deliberating and voting on the appeals. 1. ARTICLE: *CANCELED* 17.29(2)(a) and 17.29(2)(c)3 Restrictions on filling and Grading APPELLANT: Roger N. Schwartz LOCATION: Located in the NW1/4 of the SE1/4 of Section 36, T30WR17W, Town of Erin Prairie 2. ARTICLE: 17.155 (6)(b) Special Exception for a Major Home Occupation APPELLANT: Laurey Krear, Ralph and Patricia Gavic LOCATION: Located in the NW 1/4 of the NW 1/4 of Section 26, T28N-R17W, 0 Town of Rush River 3. ARTICLE: *CANCELED*17.85(2)(b)2 Wireless Communication Facilities APPELLANT: Dan and Jacque Nelson,David W. Larson LOCATION: Located in NE 1/4 of the NE 1/4 of Section 4, T28N-R18W, Town of Kinnickinnic 4. ARTICLE: 17.64(1)(b)2 Variance to Centerline of Highway Setback APPELLANT: James H. and Mildred McDermott LOCATION: Located in the S 1/2 of the NW 1/4 of the SW 1/4 of Section 25, T31 N-R19W,Town of Somerset 5. ARTICLE: 17.64(a)3 Variance to Construct Access Driveway APPELLANT: Daniel Bracht, David and Christine Ostendorf LOCATION: Located in NE 1/4 of the NE 1/4of Section 20, T31 N-R18W, Town of Star Prairie 6. ARTICLE: 17.29(2)(a) Filling and Grading in Shoreland District APPELLANT: Richard F. and Sheryl D. Lindholm LOCATION: Located in Gov. Lot 1 of Section 1, T28N-R20W, Town of Troy All interested persons are invited to attend said hearing and be heard. Additional information may be obtained from the office of the St. Croix County Zoning Director, Hudson, Wisconsin at (715) 386-4680. John Bradley, Chairman St. Croix County Board of Adjustment James and Mildred McDermott Jim Thompson explained to the Board that Mr. McDermott obtained a building permit from the Town of Somerset to build a garage. Thompson received a call about the garage and that it was too close to the road. Thompson went out and looked at the building and found that the garage did not meet the required setback from the road. He asked the McDermott's to stop construction and they did that. The McDermott's have been extremely cooperative with the Zoning Office. Thompson stated that there are physical limitations on the property that does not allow the garage to be built further back. There is a hill that would interfere with the building. Thompson introduced the following exhibits: Exhibit 1 Exhibit 2 Exhibit 8: Exhibit 4: Exhibit 5: Application for Variance Copy of the minutes from the Town of Somerset approving the variance application Copy of the Town of Somerset Ordinance Copy of application for the building permit Letter to Jim Thompson from George Sinclear James and Mildred McDermott, being duly sworn, state that they are the owners of the property. Mrs. McDermott explained that they applied for a building permit without any knowledge of a setback problem. The land drops off at the back and they cannot set the garage back any further. George Sinclear, being duly sworn, states that he is the Chairman for the Town of Somerset. He explained that the Town of Somerset made an error in issuing the permit. He went out and measured the setbacks at the McDermott home and found that their home is set back further 5 than any other home on that road. Sinclear is concerned with Mr. McDermott's health and believes that the garage needs to be where it is so that it can be near their home and Mr. McDermott would not have to walk very far. Richard King, being duly sworn, states that he is from the Town of Star Prairie and is here as a witness for the McDermotts. He has looked over the situation and reiterated that the McDermott's garage cannot be set back any further due to physical limitations of the land. The garage does not block any views or interfere with anything relating to the road. The Board will view the site later today. Laurey Krear Ralph and Patricia Gavic Thompson explained that this is a request for a major home occupation for a beauty shop in Krear's home. The applicants are in the process of rezoning the land. The rezonement hearing was held on November 17th and approved by the Planning, Zoning and Parks Committee. It will now go to the County Board for signatures. Thompson introduced the following exhibits: Exhibit 1: Application for a Special Exception Exhibit 2: Letter from the Town of Rush River recommending approval of the application Exhibit 3: Copy of the plot plan of the property showing the layout of the buildings. Exhibit 4: Schematic drawing of area of the home used for the proposed business. Laurey Krear and Ralph Gavic, being duly sworn, state that Krear is the applicant and Gavic is the owner of the property. Gavic explained that he owns the property and Krear lives there and wants to open a beauty shop. Mr. Krear was in a serious accident 2 years ago and is disabled and cannot be employed. His daughter, Laurey, wants to open the beauty shop to supplement the disability income they receive. They also have a 16 month old daughter that Laurey needs to care for so having a shop in their home would allow her to be able to care for her husband and daughter. Gavic went on to explain that the shop would be in the first floor of their two story home and would take up less than 20% of the space of the home. Krear stated that she has had an operator license for 19 years. She feels that this could turn into a successful business. The business will be subject to state inspections. Krear will be the only employee. She expects her hours of operation to be sometime between 8:00 a.m. and 10:00 p.m. She has received no opposition from the neighbors. Krear said that she will put a small sign in the front of her house, but will keep the size within what is allowed by the ordinance (2 x 3 feet). The Board will view the site. Daniel Bracht David and Christine Ostendorf Thompson explained to the Board that this is a request for a driveway variance. The parcel of" land is 10 acres and is a legal non -conforming parcel. The dimensions of the land do not allow for the 200 foot setback for the driveway, as it is only 360 feet wide. The Ostendorf's are asking for a variance to allow the driveway to be 75 feet from the neighboring driveway. Thompson further stated that it would be impossible to meet the 200 foot setback requirement on this piece of property. Thompson introduced the following exhibits: Exhibit 1: Application for a driveway variance Exhibit 2: Letter from Dave and Jody Janski to the Town of Star Prairie stating no opposition to this variance L Exhibit 3: Letter from Sue Mulhullom to the Town of Star Prairie stating no objection to this request. Exhibit 4: Letter from the Town of Star Prairie stating no objection to this request. Exhibit 5: Statement of clarification from Ostendorf's with two maps attached showing the driveways. Exhibit 6: Letter from the seller, David Bracht, asking for approval of the variance request. This letter read into the record. David and Christine Ostendorf, being duly sworn, state that they are the applicants. They will not be buying the property unless the variance is granted. They explained that the proposed site is the best place to put the driveway on the property as this would place it on the west side of the crest of the hill. There was a discussion with the Board on Exhibit 5 showing the location of the proposed driveway. From this place on the property, they can see on both sides of the crest of the hill. The Board will visit the site today. Richard F. and Sheryl D. Lindholm Thompson explained that this is an application to rip rap along the river to prevent further erosion of the property. Last spring there was a substantial amount of damage done to this area. There may be several more rip rap applications like this in the future from the same area. Thompson introduced the following exhibits: Exhibit 1: Application for special exception Exhibit 2: Copy of portions of the half section maps showing the property. Exhibit 3: Letter from Eunice Post of the DNR issuing the permit for the rip rapping Exhibit 4: Drawing submitted to the DNR showing the rip rap project Exhibit 5: Letter from the Town of Troy stating approval of the project Thompson stated that all permits are in order. Richard Lindholm, being duly sworn, states that he is the owner of the property. Thompson added that Lindholm appeared before the Planning, Zoning and Parks Committee asking permission to use the Troy Park road for this project. It appears that the Committee is favorable to this request, but has talked about some conditions in using the road. Thompson suggested using these conditions if this Board gives a favorable decision. Lindholm stated that Ron Raymond, of the Planning, Zoning and Parks Committee, told him that he could use the road, but if any damage is done, it would be the responsibility of those using the road to repair it. Lindholm would also be responsible for the key to the gate and only have the appropriate people using the road. Lindholm went on to explain that the shoreline was severely undercuf and is in need of repair. He stated that the DNR has told him that this is an environmental issue as there are some endangered species living in this area. Lindholm said that other neighbors are planning on rip rapping also. Thompson added that Joe Grant will put together a letter for Lindholm listing the conditions that the park will place on these people using the road. The Board will visit the site today. The Board recessed to visit the sites at 11:55 a.m. 7 The Board reconvened at 3:25 p.m. to render Decisions. DECISIONS Richard Ohlfs Motion by Bradley, second by Jensen to deny the application for a special exception permit for limited commercial recreational activities in an ag/residential district. The Board stated that Mr. Ohlfs could re -apply for this permit when he has a plan put together showing a timeline on the project. The following vote was taken to deny: Filipiak, no; Neumann, yes; Jensen,yes; Golz, yes; Chairman Bradley, yes. Motion carried. Levque Towers Motion by Neumann, second by Golz to approve the application for a special exception for a communication tower and for a variance to the 500 foot setback. The following vote was taken to approve: Neumann, yes; Filipiak, no; Golz, yes; Jensen, no; Chairman Bradley, no. The motion was denied. Request for special exception and variance is denied. Lowell Rivard Motion by Jensen, second by Bradley to deny the extension of the Special Exception Permit granted in December of 1996. The Board stated due to the fact that Mr. Rivard may not add the showroom until 1999, he should come back with a new application when he is ready to build the showroom. The following vote was taken to deny: Jensen, yes; Neumann, no; Filipiak, yes; Golz, yes; Chairman Bradley, yes. Motion carried. Laurey Krear/ Ralph Gavic Motion by Filipiak, second by Jensen to approve the application for a special exception with the following conditions: 1) No employees 2) Hours of operation 8:00 a.m. to 10:00 p.m. 3) All state and county permits to be obtained 4) Rezonement ordinance to be signed by County Board. The following vote was taken to approve: Golz, yes, Neumann, yes; Jensen, yes; Filipiak, yes; Chairman Bradley, yes. Motion carried. James and Mildred McDermott Motion by Neumann, second by Filipiak to approve the variance application for a road setback. The following vote was taken to approve: Jensen, yes; Golz, yes; Neumann, yes; Filipiak, yes; Chairman Bradley, yes. Motion carried. . Daniel Bracht David and Christine Ostendorf Motion by Golz, second by Jensen to approve the variance for a driveway separation. The following vote was taken to approve: Neumann, yes; Filipiak, yes; Jensen, yes; Golz, yes; Chairman Bradley, yes. Motion carried. Richard F. and Sheryl D. Lindholm Motion by Filipiak, second by Bradley to approve the special exception application for rip rapping with the following conditions: 1) Follow all DNR recommendations 2) Notify Zoning Office at the start of the project. 3) The permit is contingent on the Planning, Zoning and Parks Committee granting approval for use of the Troy Park road. All conditions established by the Committee must be complied with. The following vote was taken to approve: Jensen, yes; Golz, yes; Neumann, no; Filipiak, yes; Chairman Bradley, yes. Motion carried. Meeting adjourned at 4:10 p.m. Respectfully submitted, �'. ��s� Art Jens Secretary /dl