Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
034-1072-20-025
k,% \.� A & c \ 0 / / 7 \ Im ' -41 \ // co 7 ® G � @k\ Q) t�\\ ) ƒ)o _2 c 72/ ; ) cp ; ER \ < U- � 4 w z / _ § ( k � c R } \ \ � ` \ Q ) K \ ! \ 3 _ 0 / $ z f � \ [ % \ . c \ 7 { � U) —0 3 3kE ) k k � t � (04 7 \ \[)/ 0 % \ 4 o k a � ® , It / \ / -�\ a a a ��2 � 2 q { \ 2 \ ƒ \ co \ �~ \ + � / k < k w = 5 \ ] § k \ j < \ \ \ § a e§& e ^ c ' r (� 2 § c % e o , > f { / § \ cn o $ p 2 ) m � & a § C I — 5 f ; a E A ' @ a £ / 0 0 a 2 \ 0 3 Wisconsin Department of Commerce PRIVATE SEWAGE SYSTEM County: St. Croix Safety and Building Division INSPECTION REPORT Sanitary Permit No: 488080 0 GENERAL INFORMATION (ATTACH TO PERMIT) State Plan ID No: Personal information you provide may be used for secondary purposes [Privacy Law, s.15.04 (1)(m)]. Permit Holder's Name: City Village X Township Parcel Tax No: Thompson Trust, Mabel Springfield, Town of 034 - 1072 -20 -025 CST BM Elev: Insp. BM Elev: BM Description: SectionlTown /Range /Map No: 32.29.15.483A TANK INFORMATION ELEVATION DATA TYPE MANUFACTURER CAPACITY STATION BS HI FS ELEV. Septic Benchmark Dosing Alt. BM Aeration Bldg. Sewer H olding St /Ht Inlet TANK SETBACK INFORMATION S t/Ht Outlet PIL TANK IU WELL BLIJU. V ent o it Intake n e ep is DP5ottorn osmg ea er an. A eration Dist. Pipe 'R olding Pet. ys e J F inal e PUMP /SIPHON INFORMATION ( M anufacturer LiernanT r GPM ocl e um er I L Itt InC ion LOSS I s ystern m ea a — 10 1 st. lu V i nrcemain I Lengin i . SOIL A SORPTION SYSTEM DIMENSIONS U 7 I INFORMATION CHAMBE R T U15 I KIBLI ION SYSTEM Pipe(s) Length Dia Length Dia Spacing x Pressure Systems Only xx Mound Or At - Grade Systems Only iuvp . m R H IvIalche No Edges Topsoil Yes �?_j j ]Yes Bed /Trench Center Bed COMMENTS: (Include code discrepencies, persons present, etc.) Inspection #1: / / Inspection #2: Location: 2867 Highway 12 Wilson, WI 54027 (NW 1/4 NE 1/4 32 T29N R15W) 40 acres Lot Parcel No: 32.29.15.483A 1.) Alt BM Description = 2.) Bldg sewer length = - amount of cover = Use for additional in Plan revision Required? Yes j No other side formation. � � L Loat, L — --- tnsepctoft Signature — — — 1 £ert� No SBD -6710 (R.3/97) 0QnQWdBufldings Division County n , �Vl 201 W. Washington Ave., P.O. Box 7162 sr - 3151 ansin 66 W 1 53707 — 7162 Sanitary Permit Number (to be fined in by Co.) Dep artment of Commerce ( ^$ [ta te Plan I.D. Number Sanitary Permit Applic do 2 307 1� In accord with Comm 83.21, Wis. Aden. Code, pMwsonal ' 'on u ide may be used for secondary purposes Privacy Law, 5.04(1 ( 2 2 2006 'ect Address (if different than mailing address) 1. Application Information - Please Print All Information ST. CROIX COUNTY FO S, WZ i2 - d .7 Property Owner's Name jParcel # Lot # Block # 5;7 7 -tom Property Owner's Mailing Address ` r� 1- Property Location City, State Zip Code Phone Number �' �� '/• Section NJ ISdy W� 5 'll S 7 ?Z - ��b 7 �9 cycle / U. Type of Building (check all that apply) �� t T N, R�E o +v • ��� N �l skim Name CSM Number 01 or 2 Family Dwelling - Number of Bedrooms ❑ Publidcommercial - Describe u ❑ State Owned - Describe Use `3.75 ="t° /ZZ`j ❑City_❑VillageAownship of ri 111. Type of Permit: (Cbeek only one box on line A. Complete line B If applicable) A New System ❑ Replacement ys Rep System ❑ Treatment/Holding Tank Replacement Only ❑ Outer Modification to Existing System B. ❑ Permit Renewal ❑ Permit Revision ❑ Change of ❑ Permit Transfer to New list Previous Permit Number and Date Issued Before Expiration Plumber Owner 1V. Type of POWTS stem: Check all that appl ❑ Non - Pressurized hen- Ground ❑ Mound?: 24 in. of suitable soil Mo u n d <24 m. of suitable soil ❑ At -Grade ❑ Single Pass Sand Filter ❑ Constructed Wetland ❑ Pressurised 1n4round ❑ Holding Tank ❑Peat Filter ❑ Aerobic Treatment Unit ❑ Recincula ' Sand Filter ❑ RecirculatmgSyntheticMedisFilter 01sachingChamber ❑ Dri Line ❑ Gravel -less Pi E]Other(eV lair) c , V. Dis rsal/Iyrentment Area Information: Design Flow (gpd) Design Soil Application Rate(gpdst) Dispersal Area aired (sf) Dispersal Area Proposed (sf) System Elevation VI. Tank Info Capacity m Total Number Manufa cturer Prefab Site Steel Fiber Plastic Galloon Gallons of Units ) • 2J,4 kF A' Cm r Concrete Constructed Glass New I Existing Tanks Tsolu ]- Septic or Hokthtg alt MU �f,,„ i/7 Unit U w Aerobic Trcatmnt Un Doaiag Chamber 1 t / 101C I VII. Responsibility Statement - 1, the nde e4 err nsibilt for installation of the POWTS shown on the attached plans. PI (Print) PI Si MP/MPRS Number Business Phone Number L N 1: - 715 1 23S Plumber's Address (Street, City, State, Zip CofK A'516a c l a°Ar44 -elw( /�z Jam? VIII. Coun /De partment Use proved Sanitary Permit Fee ' (includes Groundwater Da Issued lss ent S' Surcharge Fee) C' C o rven Realm 'al c �� J 1X. Conditions of Approvai/Remens for Disapproval 1. Septic stmt, E eftw t tllt rand 4( '' Z S �r M dhpe W od must ON 62 Mnicea / Miltbsh N ee pW nWWQVnWt pal+ WwAded by 000*. 2. AN saftw* requNetmnte Islam be i sh 61 led a per q* a bb oWe / aldUwtoee. Attack complete plans (ter the County only) for the system on papa not less On 81 /3 z 11 Inches In size SBD -6398 (R. 01/03) V� b?�4 •I c7� Z- �o•c�� ` r3 to � 1 v CJP_ u -DLli- \� V0..tlt -� +u V1 r o� U X ,, t \ �,,, ; �t , l xxs -lccY� i `r i c JC e c o tot z C L / 1: o, \ �1 Ol , Lo) tea- Q tiq I t \ ot� �.�-S klZO` VrocK l� g•� O i, i �zz l I y -- - -- r Safety and Buildings 4003 N KINNEY COULEE RD commerce.Wl.gov LACROSSE WI 54601 -1831 TDD #: (608) 264 -8777 isconsiln www.wisconsin.go isco n sin.go Department of Commerce iscosin.gov Jim Doyle, Governor Mary P. Burke, Secretary January 20, 2006 CUST ID No. 222774 ATTN: POWTS Inspector HENRY F GROTE ZONING OFFICE CERTIFIED SOIL TESTING ST CROIX COUNTY SPIA E4366 353RD AVE 1101 CARMICHAEL RD MENOMONIE WI 54751 HUDSON WI 54016 CONDITIONAL APPROVAL PLAN APPROVAL EXPIRES: 01/20/2008 Identification Numbers Transaction ID No. 1230798 SITE: Stan Thompson Site ID No. 708803 Town of Springfield, St Croix County Please refer to both identification numbers, NW 1/4, NE 1/4, S32, T29N, RI 5W above, in all corres ondence with the agency. FOR: Object Type: POWTS Component Manual Regulated Object ID No.: 1058039 Maintenance required; 450 GPD Flow Rate System(s): Mound Component Manual - Version 2.0, SBD- 10691 -P (N.01 /01), and Pressure Distribution Component Manual - Version 2.0, SBD- 10706 -P (N.01 /O1) The submittal described above has been reviewed for conformance with applicable Wisconsin Administrative Codes and Wisconsin Statutes. The submittal has been CONDITIONALLY APPROVED. The owner, as defined in chapter 101.01 (10), Wisconsin Statutes, is responsible for compliance with ail code requirements. No person may engage in or work at plumbing in the state unless licensed to do so by the Dept. per s.145.06, stats. The following conditions shall be met during construction or installation and prior to occupancy or use 1. This system is to be constructed and located in accordance with the approved plans and with the "Pressure Distribution Component Manual for Private Onsite Wastewater Treatment Systems Version 2.0" SBD- 10706 -P (N.01101). 2. This system is to be constructed and located in accordance with the approved plans, and the "Mound Component Manual for Private Onsite Wastewater Systems Version 2.0" SBD - 10691- P(N.01 /O1). 3. Pursuant to outlet filter product approval stipulations, maintenance information must be given to the owner of the POWTS explaining that periodic cleaning of the septic tank outlet filter is required. The access opening used to service the filter shall terminate at or above finished grade with a watertight cover. 4. Proper landscaping of the mound and land surface up slope of the mound is critical to proper mound performance and operation. See the approved plans for details. 5. This approval is based in part on an interpretive determination approved pursuant to s. Comm 85.60(2), Wis. Adm. Code and recorded under transaction number 1231007. It is subject to the conditions set forth in that approval. A copy of the approved plans, specifications and this letter shall be on -site during construction and open to inspection by authorized representatives of the Department, which may include local inspectors. All permits required by the state or the local municipality shall be obtained prior to commencement of construction /instal l atioWoperati on. In granting this approval the Division of Safety & Buildings reserves the right to require changes or additions should conditions arise making them necessary for code compliance. As per state stats 101. 12(2), nothing in this review shall relieve the designer of the responsibility for designing a safe building, structure, or component. ,F r HENRY F GROTE Page 2 1/20/2006 Inquiries concerning this correspondence may be made to me at the telephone number listed below, or at the address on this letterhead. The above left addressee shall provide a copy of this letter to the owner and any others who are responsible for the installation, operation or maintenance of the POWTS. Sincerely, Fee Required $ 175.00 Fee Received $ 175.00 Balance Due $ 0.00 eroy G ansky, stewater ecialist Integrated Services Bureau WiSMART code: 7633 (715) 726 -2544 Voice (715) 726 -2549 Fax Leroy. Jansky @W isconsin.Gov r - Stan Thompson - Mound Construction Materials and Techniques All materials must comply with Comm 84 and be installed in accordance with manufacturer's specifications. Construction methods must comply with the following Component Manuals: RECEIVED Mound, SBD- 10691 -P (01/01) JAN - 9 2006 Pressure Distribution, SBD- 10706 -P (01/01) SAFETY & BUILDINGS 1 98 P.O.W.T S. Location: NW ' /o, NE ' /o, Sec. 32, T 29 N, R 15 W Conditionall Town: Springfield ,� County: St. Croix A TPROVE D Date: January 10, 2006 DIVISION OF SAFETY AND BUILDINGS Owner: Stan Thompson EE G RESPO ENCE Address: 2867 HW 12 Wilson, WI 54027 -1\ G Designer: Henry Grote 0 ,� 4 0N \� Signature: , �I�s' ; Q License: WI D 999-007 / /// /1 E;`G�`�� Attachments: SBD -10577 - Plan Approval Application SBD -8330 Page 1: cover 2: design criteria & calculations 3: plot plan 4: system cross section 5: plan view, lateral detail 6: pump tank exit detail 7: pump curve 8: system management page 1 of 8 Design Criteria Residential Wastewater Contaminant Load: 30 mg/L < BOD5 < 220 mg/L 4 Anticipated septic tank effluent 30 mg/L < TSS < 150mg/L Fecal Coliform > 10,000 cfu/100 mL Fats, oils, grease < 30 mg/L Bedrooms x 100 gal/bedroom/day x 1.5 gallons /day hydraulic load Design Calculations In situ designed loading rate n b gallons /sq. ft. per day Depth to estimated high ground water in. Depth to bedrock in. Cross slope at system 2 - % ^^ Y Force main length 2 ° ft. of in. Manifold/header length ft. of in. Drain -back gallons Lateral length � ft. of V 1 Z in. Lateral elevation ° 3. ° ft. @ bottom of lateral Lateral hole size ��� in. @ b ° in. ( 3, ft.) Spacing � O holes /lateral holes total Lateral volume gallons Total lateral discharge rate Z 6, gallons /minute @ 2 ' S ft. head Network pressure compensation losses 0' -+ � ft. Elevation difference �' ft. Friction loss ft. @ gallons /minute Total dynamic head ft. Pump /sij*on z`i gpm @ I Z- ft. of head Manufacturer `� d 0. �c- Model # Dose volume gallons Lift/s*on tank 6 `' - ° gallons Septic tank k gallons Effluent filter o-o c/ o Q -o Measurement pump on and off S ` ° in. Height alarm from tank bottom in. Reserve capacity �`' �� �' gallons specs.calcs.res Page Z of g a. eL V�Yt V�� Oi\Ow Z w► ` � b i�.�co�1 S LK^ o g L a w•av 1 i o� i • 1 l a%n V :two t - IT, I I �z IZo,c)' I p', P v c. "T ` �21 Ova I v, � ` I I • �/� �, � 0 1 .� o \..'tQ�..J4 w, �oO 1 ` o�., `: »Q. �a � �, � ) 3, O � a ..r.� f i 1. 'K i �Q. �•. I ii Fort M r ,, " ' WEATNEFPRa,;: LOCKING r0vER T Ct/A�N 1N6 .4 /;'BE� . h QV�CK Di�C.O�dV ►CT —� Grade elev. --> IL 4" PVC sch A 40, 3' onto � solid ground � I 4 PVC � 24u 2.D, � sch 40 II vent 3 MANUOLP � � i A i �O.Qu NOGt 1P�'KavLD 4" PVC �QS T JAM J sch BAFFLE "'' ALL p p AL 3' onto i c� — / ZL w �X ( - \ V'O Z" DN sol 11 ground S "" • �/ CD v^ v^ e h' o OAR PU.1-LP D / i b, M I C O � F'rc F LY t b <oCK SPEGfFI'CATIOIJS OCSC T�uK r\AUUFACTURCR: �' IJLIMBER OF DOSES: S b _ per day TA,rJK 51ZC ; \ 0-� �b GALLOQS .DOSE VOLUME ALARI' ?Ik 1UFACTURCR; S `� ti�v� IIJCLUOING 6ACKFLOW. gal rMODCL ►Ju!✓bcv \01 1 � ``' CAPACITIES, A = 2o.-0 1u_j R �3S Z- `� K gallons swiTCH TyPC; B Z iuCHES OR 13.S gallons PUMP r ; ° v 0. 2 - C � S -' 0 iucaES OR �� gallons MOOCL 1JUMDCR', T D■ INCHES OR (SO, g4� gallons �wiTCH �MQ.4�v w bPE Q07 E: PUM AW ALARM ARE TO 6E MI1 JIMUM OISCHA RATE G INSTALLED Ou SCPnRA ?E circuits LRr'..�'� piFFCRC►JCf OCTWECIJ PUMP OFF A►JO DISTRIbUTIOQ PIPE.. � � FEET QCTWORK SUPPLY PRL;wKE . , , , , , , * � FCET OF FORCE P'1AIIJ X 1,Lk F /IoorjKICT10u FACTOR. 6 � FEET '2 TOTAL 0' 1QAMIC. HEAD = 11'O� FF CT / 3 , IuTC±tK,AL 0 IMEIJ6101JC 1 0F TA1.1K: LE►JC,7N ' / ;w�oTH , Llqulo oC p-, 6 Q 1 A G. 5 6 • Engineering D , Pump Characteristics Performance Data ► /AA►IK Uodt Ssr�rsrswb T � ! A+dewatk M#h SN113UI I _ �sapowr .30 1 hkl w or AMI*, Shied P4 0 1 ■ RAAL IS SO lhme 0 1 3 r 1p .__ _.._.. .r........_.. VsN 11S I 1 NKr: 60 ( I o` o lerppentere 12" Asl�iear w�aus ux r la MORA 0ts4+1 A a I 1,ISidctloe Cl•ss A 04cchar Stse i I /2' N 13411W Total R*W foot 4 1 t 12 1 16 20 1 24 $0114 WONAq 3/4' 11411w) 0'M (U.S.) 1 44 1 =6 21P 23 12 1 0 Uadl Wdgh 30 ils. ►owtr Cord 16/x, SJTW, 2W ssd. Dimensional Data Materials of Construction 7%) ;,�; *p w. I 2. (agawll �•�« � H" SMSs{ss SSW P A j s•y : In �� Nr Ior nroeuaim MW Labr$ ESA DWKtrk Oi y > ab IV" u ' � rd � rt Ccs C•st k•II s. aJoil N„1 04LMWI a, Wh rum+ to * q nh 1 a ad pr4w OW rbw spodlmWn nlllaul n,lt► Aid&" Seel Fetes: Csim /CMwk �• Shvfl S.d S•Id 1•dln A" And Wd * "61 Slow S 1L �, W ws: hm-N r E * 7rc Cnt 0" get" cxrl lows YAO Rrw M 1•N — 90tte•1 IpOwW Tbnaikok rat S '' yt LOP EslO"WW TMrnl Onik Faslr'Nrs SttiJess Steel — ;" 1999 H drorraic' Nimps. Ashlaro, Ohio A' R' h Rmoved. �r f MYDRQMATIC w - Your Awlkv, Lora Disrribvror- • 1 810 Bantr 490 AsNand, Che 44104 lol: 419.219.5041 Fir. 419.1114011 Web Silt: m.ponldrpunAmm "' 2 SILLS O"ICIS IN ALL ASAJOR CRIES AND COUNYRIES clam u: W- 02.6390 1209 SM 41, f x1 ' System Management Management of this system is critical. As a condition of approval of these plans this system management section must be reviewed with the owner, and the owner must be provided with a complete set of plans including this management section. If problems develop with the adsorption system or any other system components, the installing plumber or the St. County Zoning Office, 715 - 386 -4680, should be contacted for assistance. General Proper functioning of an on -site disposal system, "septic system," is significantly dependent on the volume of water which flows into the system and the level of contaminants in that volume. The lower the volume of water and the lower the level of contaminants, the better and longer the system will function. Typical system components include a septic tank or compartment to settle out solids and contain greases and oils, a filter on the outlet of the septic tank to retain small particles of the same density as water, a dose tank or compartment to allow a dose to be accumulated, a pump and controls or automatic siphon, and finally some type of soil adsorption cell to recycle the water in a manner to protect ground water quality and public health. I . If the septic tank is installed prior to sheet -rock and /or painting, pump the septic tank before normal use begins to ensure adherence to contaminant load design criteria. 2. Install water- saving appliances whenever and wherever possible. 3. Repair even small water leaks as soon as possible. 4. Never pour grease or oil down any drain or stool. 5. Garbage disposals are not recommended; if you must have one, use it sparingly 6. No paper products other than tissue should go into the system. 7. No chemicals should go into the system. 8. Avoid surge flows of water; try to spread laundry throughout the week. 9. Septic tank effluent must be less than or equal to the design criteria specified in page 2 of these plans. 10. If septic or dose tanks are no longer used, they must be properly abandoned. 11. If construction timing and weather could create a frozen infiltration system, weather - proofing with plastic sheeting and heavy mulching may be required to maintain a functional system at start-up. 12. The upslope toe of the mound system must be landscaped with additional fill to blend this area into the upslope natural grade; this will minimize the possibility of the system trapping surface run - off; final settled slope should be 2 -3% over the system or 2 -3% diverting surface run -off around the ends of the system. Maintenance 1. The septic tank must be inspected every three years by a properly licensed person. 2. If necessary, the septic tank must be pumped to remove solids and scum; pumping is required if the combined scum and solids volume equals one third of the tank volume. 3. When the septic tank is pumped, any solids in the bottom of the dose tank must be pumped, and the filter must be back - washed into the septic tank to remove accumulated material. System use may require more frequent filter cleaning; initial inspections of the filter should be made every 6 months until a minimum time sequence is determined. 4. Periodic observation pipe inspections should be made by the owner to examine the state of the in -situ soil adsorption cell. Quarterly inspections are recommended; a licensed plumber should be notified if effluent is consistently ponded in the adsorption cell. 5. If this system contains specific treatment components other than those mentioned here, maintenance requirements will accompany their specifications. 6. The pumping components for this system include an alarm which must be installed and remain on a separate circuit from the pump. If the alarm is activated, minimize water use and notify a licensed plumber for service as soon as possible. The system allows reserve capacity to accumulate some necessary flow until normal service can be restored; this volume is minimal, and no more than one or two days should pass before any necessary repairs can be made. 7. Avoid compaction such as vehicle traffic within 15' down -slope of the adsorption system. 8. Avoid disturbing the system itself such that might encourage erosion or disturb the required seeding of the system. 9. Particularly avoid winter traffic such as sliding or snowmobiling which might compact snow and lead to increased frost depth. 10. Surface drainage must be diverted around the system; avoid landscape changes which might send surface run -off into the system area. 11. Warning: Do not enter septic, dose or other treatment tanks; death may result because they may contain lethal gases or insufficient oxygen. Contingency Plan Wastewater monitoring of volume and quality is not a normal requirement for low effluent strength systems; such monitoring may become necessary if problems develop. Any necessary monitoring shall be done in accord with the requirements of Comm 83.54 (2). Pumping and hauling of wastewater may be necessary while analysis and repairs are implemented. Additional testing, designing, and /or installation of additional treatment components or conversion to a holding tank may be necessary. Page 8 of 8 s Safety and Buildings commerce.wi. OV 4003 N KINNEY COULEE RD g LA CROSSE WI 54601 -1831 TDD #: (608) 264 -8777 iscon www.w www.commer isco goWsb! Department of Commerce isconsin.gov Jim Doyle, Governor Mary P. Burke, Secretary January 20, 2006 CUST ID No. 222774 ATTN: POWTS Inspector HENRY F GROTE ZONING OFFICE CERTIFIED SOIL TESTING ST CROIX COUNTY SPIA E4366 353RD AVE 1101 CARMICHAEL RD MENOMONIE WI 54751 HUDSON WI 54016 CONDITIONAL APPROVAL PLAN APPROVAL EXPIRES: 01/20/2008 Identification Numbers Transaction ID No. 1231007 SITE: Stan Thompson Site ID No. 708803 Town of Springfield, St Croix County Please refer to both identification numbers; NW 1/4, NE 1/4, S32, T29N, R15W above; in all cones otdence with the 'agenc FOR: Object Type: Soil Saturation Determination Regulated Object ID No.: 1058162 The submittal described above has been reviewed for conformance with applicable Wisconsin Administrative Codes and Wisconsin Statutes. The submittal has been CONDITIONALLY APPROVED. The owner, as defined in chapter 101.01(10), Wisconsin Statutes, is responsible for compliance with all code requirements. The following conditions shall be met during construction or installation and prior to occupancy or use: 1. Approval is hereby granted pursuant to s. Comm 85.60(2), Wis. Adm. Code, to estimate the depth to seasonal soil saturation based on an interpretive determination process. Approval of the interpretive determination negates the requirement in s. Comm 8530(2)(b), Wis. Adm. Code to designate the ground surface as the highest level of soil saturation when redoximorphic features are less than 4 inches below the bottom of the A horizon. 2. The estimated highest level of prolonged soil saturation approved under this determination is six inches below grade. At least 30 inches of sand lift on top of six inches of unsaturated, in -situ soil is required for adequate treatment and dispersal. 3. The basal soil application rate for the mound shall be 0.20 gpd/sf, and the linear loading rate 3.75 gpd/ft. 4. Chisel plowing to a depth of 16 inches immediately prior to sand placement is required to improve vertical water movement into the soil solum. 5. Landscaping up slope of the mound shall be incorporated into the POWTS design to prevent surface water from concentrating along the up slope edge of the mound and to divert surface water drainage away from the system. 6. This approval shall remain valid unless the site is altered in such a way that the depth to soil saturation would change or if saturated conditions are observed for seven consecutive days at depths less than 3 feet below the infiltrative surface of the POWTS distribution component. 7. This approval in no way relinquishes the use of color patterns to estimate the depth to high groundwater on any other parcels or portions of parcels. 8. A copy of this approval letter and attachments must accompany the mound system design for this site for purposes of plan approval and sanitary permit issuance. If the Interpretive Determination Report was accompanied with a plan and an expiration date is shown on this letter, the expiration date only applies to the plans for the design, not to the decision on the Interpretive Determination Report. r HENRY F GROTE Page 2 1/20/2006 A copy of the approved plans, specifications and this letter shall be on -site during construction and open to inspection by authorized representatives of the Department, which may include local inspectors. If plan index sheets were submitted in lieu of additional full plansets, a copy of this approval letter and index sheet shall be attached to plans that correspond with the copy on file with the Department. All permits required by the state or the local municipality shall be obtained prior to commencement of construction /installationbperation. If this construction project will disturb one or more acres of land, an Erosion Control Notice of Intent (NOI) shall be filed with the department 14 days prior to any earth disturbing activities. In granting this approval the Division of Safety& Buildings reserves the right to require changes or additions should conditions arise making them necessary for code compliance. As per state stats 101.12(2), nothing in this review shall relieve the designer of the responsibility for designing a safe building, structure, or component. Inquiries concerning this correspondence may be made to me at the telephone number listed below, or at the address on this letterhead. Sincerely, Fee Required $ 100.00 Fee Received $ 100.00 Balance Due $ 0.00 Leroy G ansky, astewate pecialist Integrated Services Bureau WiSMART code:,7633 (715) 726 -2544 Voice (715) 726 -2549 Fax Ijansky@commerce.state.wi.us 1 1231007 Interpretive Determination Report For an A +0" Mound Septic System p.p.W.T.S. Conditionally On the A F DV E D DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE Stan Thompson property DIVI i0N OF SAFETY AND BUILDINGS S: =E C RRESP DENCE Pending CSM from northwest corner NW 1 /4, NE 1 /4, Section 32, T 29 N, R 15 W Town of Springfield St. Croix County, Wisconsin RECEIVED Submitted by JAN - 9 2006 SAFETY & BUILDINGS Henry F. Grote, CSTM 222774 Certified Soil Testing, LLC E. 4366 353 Ave. Menomonie, WI 54751 715- 233 -0398 I Contents Page Introduction 1 Methods 1 Local Hydrology 2 Geomorphology 3 Soil Disturbance and Hydraulic Modification 3 Landscape Position 3 Soil Series 5 Data 6 Conclusions /Recommendations 6 Attachments Soil Evaluation Report, Henry F. Grote Topographic Detail, Section 32, T 29 N, R 15 W Soil Series Map, Soil Survey of St. Croix County i Interpretive Determination Report for an A +0" Mound Septic System on the Stan Thompson Property Introduction On November 7, 2005 Henry F. Grote, CSTM 222774, Certified Soil Testing, conducted a Soil and Site Evaluation on the Stan Thompson property for the purpose of establishing the potential for an onsite wastewater dispersal system. These evaluations were conducted on a proposed parcel to be created from the northwest corner of the forty acre property described as the NW ' / 4 of the NE' /4 of Section 32, T 29 N, R 15 W, Town of Springfield, St. Croix County, Wisconsin. Methods Soil color, texture, structure, consistence and redoximorphic features have been evaluated and reported on the accompanying Soil Evaluation Report in accordance with guidelines under Comm 85 of the Wisconsin Administrative Code. Pertinent information has been abstracted from the Soil Survey of St. Croix County, Wisconsin. Topographic detail has been obtained from the DeLorme 3 -1) TopoQuads CD mapping release. Field investigation included eleven backhoe pits with soil profiles documented on the attached Soil Evaluation Report. Rod and transit elevations were obtained at pertinent pit locations, along a tentative design contour line, and over twenty foot grid intervals to allow the insertion of nominal contour lines on the detailed plot plan. Previous work on the east end of the eighty acres of which this parcel is a part showed soils which lacked A +4" and resulted in a state on -site investigation which confirmed suitability for an A +0 mound. Henry Grote, Stan & Mabel Thompson, 1/5/02 report for NE ' / 4 of NE '/4 of Sec. 32, T 29 N, R 15 W and Jansky inspection report of April 30, 2002. Customer has not requested preparation and submittal of interpretive report for the NE '/4 of the NE '/4. i Local Hydrology The major local hydrology input is from annual precipitation. This is estimated at from 29.57 inches to 31.5 inches. Surface runoff is an additional input most significantly during heavy precipitation events. The proposed mound site and upslope land use is currently hay crop ground. The upslope ground extends about 100 feet north and east of north of the proposed system area and can be expected to adsorb significant volumes of precipitation during the growing season when most of the precipitation occurs. Upslope topography then is almost flat to slightly downslope to the north for about 100 yards towards the right of way to Highway 12. Larger scale upslope topography shows a gradual rise to the east for about 1/8 mile. Due to the convex, nose slope orientation of the proposed site, upslope toe landscaping to divert surface runoff to the west and southeast is the preferred method of minimizing adverse impact on mound performance due to excessive surface drainage. Dense glacial till beneath a shallow loess cap provides significant groundwater protection from possible surface contamination. Water outputs consist of surface runoff, soil infiltration, and evapotranspiration. Surface runoff will generally be minimal unless frozen soil conditions or excessively heavy and prolonged precipitation occurs. Soil infiltration is described as "somewhat poorly drained" for typical Skyberg series soils. This is reasonable for the observed moderately and weakly structured silt loam and sandy loam A horizons; the B horizons are generally weakly structured with textures varying from sandy loams to silt loams Restrictive, massive, sandy loam and sandy clay loam till units were observed at depths below 14 to 28 inches. Slower infiltration is anticipated during wet spring periods when the soils are closer to field capacity and slow to dry. The underlying massive till unit will be significantly restrictive to vertical infiltration. Lateral movement of water through more permeable upper horizons will be facilitated by the 7.8 to 8.2 percent cross slopes below a proposed 100.0 contour design line. Heavy and prolonged precipitation - 2.5 ' Soil Survey of St. Croix County, United States Department of Agriculture, Soil Conservation Service, July 1987, p 139. (River Falls, WI data) Wisconsin Average Annual Precipitation (1961 - 1990), www.crh.noaa.gov /mkx/data/wipcpn.gif 5 Soil Survey of St. Croix County, United States Department of Agriculture, Soil Conservation Service, July 1987, p. 57. 2 f inches in 24 hours; described as once in two years - will also slow infiltration as the A horizons near field capacity. Evapotranspiration will be a significant factor during the growing season but of no value during the winter season Geomorphology Limestone bedrock underlies most of St. Croix County. Typically the limestone is sandwiched between layers of sandstone which is then overlaid with glacial till forming the principal soil parent material. Rockian till, correlated with the first sub -stage of Wisconsin glaciation, is the parent till for Skyberg soils. The Rockian till is overlain by a thin concurrent and /or post - glaciation loess cap. Soil Disturbance and Hydraulic Modification The proposed mound location is uniform topography. Land use was hay crops in 2005; minimal recent tillage and significant root penetration have enhanced soil structure. The upper B horizon exhibited weak platy structure in one pit profile which is a possible artifact of tillage but is as likely a result of the natural deposition process of loess soils. Hydraulic conductivity of the solum can — and should be — improved by deep chisel plowing to a depth of at least sixteen inches. Landscape Position The landscape position of the proposed mound site is on the western slope near the midpoint point of the west end of a glacial ground moraine. The proposed location, along the 100.0 contour, is located on mapped Skyberg soils in a classic "nose" landscape, convex orientation. The 100.0 contour is located on a south slope with small scale cross slopes slightly west of south at 7.8 to 8.2% although the general slope of the moraine is to the west. The moraine rises to the east to a nominal elevation of 1280 MSL, about' /4 mile south of Highway 12, just east of 290 6 Soil Survey of St. Croix County, United States Department of Agriculture, Soil Conservation Service, July 1987, p 140. 3 St., almost '' /z mile east of the 100.0 contour which is at a nominal elevation of 1210 MSL. The moraine slopes from just above the 100.0 contour about '' /z a mile to the west; natural surface drainage is to the south of the 100.0 contour about 120 feet to a shallow surface drainage feature which trends west about '/z mile and into the Eau Galle River at a nominal elevation of 1142 MSL. Typical wetland vegetation is evident along and immediately south of the surface drainage feature south of B -2. A shallow surface drainage feature, which appears to be an old dead furrow, impacts the east end of the proposed site just above pit B -8. The B -8 location was profiled with some anticipation of possible indicators of excess soil hydraulic loading, but redoximorphic features were not observed there above 9 inches. This dead furrow slopes uphill about 1/8 mile to the east with a cross slope to the south over the whole run which likely minimizes flow to the west. Landscaping to the east end of the proposed mound structure must divert potential surface drainage to the south, away from the system. No structures are down -slope to interfere with lateral movement of effluent. The 7.8% to 8.2% slopes at the mound site will increase the hydraulic gradient and encourage lateral movement of treated effluent. Upslope surface runoff can — and should — be minimized by landscaping fill up- slope of the system. The upslope toe of the proposed system should be extended with additional fill such that surface runoff is diverted to the west and southeast and ultimately around the west and southeast ends of the mound. The small scale cross slopes at the proposed mound location combined with the available length are significant reasons to favor this location. Enhanced lateral effluent movement plus low linear loading are excellent indicators of good system performance for an A +0 mound system. 4 Soil Series The Soil Survey of St. Croix County maps the site soils as Skyberg Series close to the boundary of both Magnor and Amery Series upslope to the east. These soils are respectively described as "somewhat poorly drained" ( Skyberg), "somewhat poorly drained" (Magnor), and "well drained" (Amery). Field observations of soil pits are in reasonable agreement with these mappings. All three series are Alfisols; Families vary from Coarse -loamy mixed (Amery) to Fine -loamy mixed (Magnor) to Fine -loamy mixed, mesic ( Skyberg); subgroups are Typic Glossoboralfs (Amery) to Aquic Glossoboralfs (Magnor) to Udollic Ochraqualfs ( Skyberg). Field observations show redoximorphic features absent to depths of 9 -12 inches in four pits representative of the proposed mound site. The B horizon redoximorphic features in the system area were typically few and faint but common and distinct in one pit below the observed A -2 horizon. Periodic soil saturation is indicated below 9 inches by these observations. Pits 6 and 9 show soil profiles more characteristic of the upslope Amery soils in that subsoil profiles consist of sand and loamy sand horizons below the heavier upper soil profiles of silt loam and sandy loam. These profiles are a significant reason for choosing this area over possible sites explored by the seven other soil pits at differing topographic locations. The Amery soils are described as formed in areas of pitted drift which are typically formed by the third sub -stage of Wisconsin glaciation, the Cary till. It is possible that these sandy subsoils were formed by the influence of this later glaciation sub -stage over the older Rockian sub - stage. More likely they were formed by erosional deposition from the upslope mapped Amery soils. In either case the better drained, sandy subsoils add weight to the conclusion that a successful A +0 mound can be installed in this area. ' Clyde Series soils are mapped in the drainage way located some one hundred plus feet to the south of the proposed mound location. 5 V Data . The soil and site evaluation report and data are similar to other sites which have received Department of Commerce approvals for A +0" mounds with a minimum of six inches of seasonally unsaturated soils in the upper A horizon. Examples include the Lisa Mosentine site, ID #636612, Anthony Ludwig site, ID #634143, Jon Mentink site, ID #787909, Tim Holldorf site, ID # 849265, and Karen & Keith Anderson site, ID #639788. Conclusions/Recommendations 1. Seasonally saturated soil conditions do not occur in the upper 9 inches of the soil profile as indicated by the absence of redoximorphic features. 2. The A horizon in the proposed system area is Munsell color 7.5YR 3/2 to 10YR 3/2 which indicates an organic matter content nominally of 25 g /kg in the range of 20 -30 g /kg or 2.5 percent. This level of organic matter is indicative of relatively good drainage and aerobic conditions. 3. The relatively low level of organic matter indicated by the Munsell value of 3 would facilitate observation of high chroma redoximorphic features in the A horizon. The general lack of observation of these features in the A horizons is strengthened by the low organic matter content which lends further evidence to a conclusion that at least nine inches of soil is present which is not periodically saturated for more than seven days; while 4. Site conditions did allow the observation of redoximorphic features in a down -slope pit (pit 2) located 95 feet below the 100.0 contour, at an elevation of 96.4, which showed an organic rich A horizon, 7.5YR 3/1 Munsell, with few, fine faint observed redoximorphic features in the lower four inches; which 5. Adds weight to the conclusion that nine inches of suitable soil are found at the proposed 100.0 elevation. Tyler presentation, Reading Shallow Soil Saturation, 10/15/04, Ashland UW Ag Research Station. 6 6.. No hydric soil indicators 9 are present in the observed system area soil pits; this conclusion is based on particularly careful review of the indicators for All Soils and Loamy and Clayey Soils; however 7. Pit 2, 130 feet down -slope of the system area, does meet hydric indictor F6, Redox Dark Surface, with a matrix value of 3 and a chroma of 1; this pit is located in the shallow surface drainage feature. 8. System area pits demonstrate root penetration to depths of 14 -67 inches; such depths are not expected in soils which remain saturated for significant time periods. 9. The small scale cross slopes of 7.8% to 8.2% indicate excellent potential for lateral movement of effluent down -slope into the more permeable upper soil horizons and away from the mound system without surface ponding. 10. The available length which allows for a 120 foot long rock cell gives a low linear loading rate of 3.75 gallons per day per foot which enhances the ability of the system to allow effluent to infiltrate the in situ soils. 11. The site is acceptable for a mound septic system with a minimum of six inches of unsaturated soil for treatment and dispersal of treated wastewater effluent as allowed by Comm 83.44(3)(b)l. The observed nine inches of redoximorphic -free natural soil will allow treated effluent to be assimilated into the subsurface without ponding on the ground surface. 12. Site preparation requires mowing and removal of as much vegetation as possible followed by deep chisel plowing to at least a 16 inch depth. 13. Additional fill landscaping soil shall be added to the upslope area of the mound structure filling the concave, upslope area between the west and southeast system ends. The final, settled slope of this landscape fill shall be at least 2% to the west and southeast such that any near - system surface drainage will be diverted around the southeast end to the south, and around the west end to the west and southwest. 14. Landscaping to the east of the east end of the system, in conjunction with the above upslope landscaping, must ensure that any surface drainage following the existing dead 9 Field Indicators of Hydric Soils in the United States, A Guide for Identifying and Delineating Hydric Soils, Version 4.0 (March 1998), p5 ff, 13 ff, & 20 ff.; p 16 for F6 indicator. 7 - furrow is diverted to the south to further minimize the adverse impact of natural surface drainage on the system. 15. Mound construction requires 2.5 feet of ASTM C -33 sand lift immediately placed on the freshly plowed ground surface. Construction must take place under relatively dry conditions. This depth of sand creates an effective sand filter and can be expected to produce a treated effluent with less than 30 mg /L of both BOD5 and TSS and fecal coliform concentrations of <10,000 cfu/100mL. 16. Site observations indicate that a minimum of 2.25 feet of sand fill is required; however 2.5 feet is recommended to ensure a conservative design and maximize system longevity. 17. The rock cell in the mound structure shall be 3.75' by 120 for a linear loading rate of 3.75 gallons per day per foot for a three bedroom residence. 18. The sand basal area loading must be a maximum of 0.2 gallons per day per square foot which can be accomplished by extending the sand toe to 15.0 feet below the lower edge of the rock cell giving a total system basal area loading rate of 0.16 gallons per day per square foot. 19. The system management plan must provide adequate maintenance information to maximize the system longevity. Final authority for this site's approval rests with the appropriate regulatory authorities, the Wisconsin Department of Commerce and the St. Croix County Zoning Office. This report, conclusions and recommendations are the professional opinion of Henry F. Grote, CSTM 222774. 8 l N44 58' f I d4 Ge - A MI N44 ( 1�0 d aYel+i � f• 4�,J t i �c��++ww"' 'r- t Mme" (,M `/ I �1f s.._ E l 't�t) ti d 238 �. {43 N44-° -5 r � , � I .., �---•. � -,` I I I �' I + , } 2.12 �\ N44°-5 7 i IN , , 3 -D TopoQuads Copyright 0 1999 DeLorme Yarmouth, ME 04096 Source Data: USGS 400 ft Scale: 1 : 10,400 Detail: 14-3 Datum: WGS84 72 S7. CROIX N (Joins sheet 64) HaA tP Va6 AoA r Sr ,a.. "rAt AuA m li` SrA SrA VaB i Sa HaA AoA t 'r.\ X;, C ,41V 'Ham. SaB SrA r, vas _.AoA ` � Y P@ AuA 8PA g SA A s rA BPA:� "S SaC2 HaA 20 C2 Sa( Sa FJA k x i ats He ` a c 6l til A ,V Fr S(A `, CoU AuA SrA �X+ SrAi �* r. NA , NN SrA wi SaG2 Sr A? ii�+iMR.e.cx..' # r z a WI a j 4 w vt�A. FoBd FnB ". AmC2M B d F S b eU < r v AmC2 /uA ,m RgC2 MaB t / Ma6' c FoC2 FnB FOB 7N Aij AoA AsB A6B yak . 1 1 A Q p� , f S>lf� � i BP P ' °r!� ADC i . Bi FnB _ SaB AoB SrA rA (Joins sheet 80) < Visconsin #2351 SOIL EVALUATION REPORT Department of Comme in accordance with Comm 85, Wis. Adm. Code Page 1 of 5 Division of Safety uildings Certified Soil Testing, LLC ? � >, FC 1 ..- y Count � Attach complete site plan on paper not less 8 x 11 inches in size. Plan must St. Croix include, but not limited to: vertical and horizontal r erence point (BM), direction and percent slope, scale or dimensions, north arrow, ar d locati©l1 "d 4istpn � � ) eare road. Parcel I.D. ' Please print all infor 034 -10 -20 -0 tion. Review y Date Personal information you provide may be used for second ry puroie1:(RKu�iky(Ifa INTfb.04 (1 (m)). te a Property Owner ti on Thompson, Stan Govt. Lot 41/4, N 1/4, S62, T29N, R15W Property Owner's Mailing Address Lot # Block # Subd. Name o CSMA 28 67 HW 12 City State Zip Code Phone Number City _] Village X Town Nearest Road Wilson WI 1 54027 1 715 772 - 4867 Springfield HW 12 New Construction Use: ® Residential / Number of bedrooms 3 Code derived design flow rate 450 GPD Replacement ❑ Public or commercial - Describe: Parent material loess over till Flood plain elevation, if applicable NA ft. General comments i nstall 17L rock cell mound on 100.0 contour as upslope edge of rock w 2.5' sand fi w/ state and recommendations: coup y approval for interpretive determination F- 1� Boring # Boring -- Pit Ground surface elev. 102.2 ft. Depth to limiting factor 0 in. Soil Application Rate Horizon Depth Dominant Color Redox Description Texture Structure Consistence Boundary Roots GPD /ft in. Munsell Qu. Sz. Cont. Color Gr. Sz. Sh. 'Eff#1 'Eff#2 A-4- _1 0 -4 7.5YR 3/2 - SO 2 m gr mvfr gs lm .6 .8 tO 2 4 -10 7.5YR 3/2 - sil 1 m sbk mvfr cs 1m .4 6 -4 3 10 -14 10YR 5/4 c2d 7.5YR 4/6,5/3 sil 1 m sbk mvfr gs lm .4 I .6 4 14 -20 10YR 5/4 c2d 7.5YR 4/6,5/3 A 0 m mvfr gs 1m 0 .2 5 1 20 -31 7,5YR 4/6 c3p 0YR 6/3/8 sl 0 m mfr cs lm .2 .6 6 31 -50 10YR 5/4 fid 10YR 6/2 scl 0 m mfi - - 0 0 1 m roots to 28 "; occ gr /cob /st below 10 ";H3 occasionally parts to 1 m pl; lacks A +4 "; presumptive limit is 0" Boring # Boring X Pit Ground surface elev, 96.4 ft. Depth to limiting factor 0 in. Soil Application Rate Horizon Depth Dominant Color Redox Description Texture Structure Consistenc Boundary Roots GPD /ft in. Munsell Qu, Sz. Cont. Color Gr. Sz. Sh. `Eff#1 'Eff#2 ,.0 1 0 -7 7.5YR 3/1 - sil 1 f -m sbk mvfr CS im ': .4 I .6 2 7 -11 7.5YR 3/1 flf 7.5YR 3/4,5/3 sil 1 m sbk mvfr CS 1m .4 .6 3 11 -18 10YR 5/4 m lOYR 6/3 /6 sil 1 m sbk mvfr gs lm .4 .6 4 18 -46 7.5YR 4/6 c3p 7.5YR 5/8,5/3 SI 0 m mfr - im .2 .6 i 1 m roots to 42 "; H 2 occasionally parts to 1 m pl; H 4 has pockets Is; lacks A +4 "; presumptive limit is 0" ' Effluent #1 = BOD 30 < 220 mg /L and TSS >30 150 mg /L ' Effluent #2 BO d TSS < 30 mg /L CST Name (Please Print) Signatur : Number Henry F. Grote 22774 Address Certified Soil Testing, LLC Date Evaluation Conducted Telephone Number E. 4366 353rd Ave. Menomonie, WI 54751 11/7/2005 715 233 - 0398 SBD -8330 (R 07!00) 4 Property Owner Thompson, Stan Parcel ID # 034- 1072 -20 -025 Page 2 of 5 T Boring r Boring # Pit Ground surface elev. - 104 ft. Depth to limiting factor 0 in. , Soil Application Rat Horizon Depth Dominant Color Redox Description Texture Structure Consistenge Boond4ty' " Roots GPD /W in. Munsell Qu. Sz. Cont. Cola Gr. Sz. Sh. *Eff#1 *Eff #2 1 i i 0 -4 7.5YR 3/2 - sil 2 m gr mvfr gs 1M .6 .8 i 2 4 -12 7.5YR 3/2 f1d 10YR 6/3 sil 1 m sbk mvfr cs 1m .4 .6 m2d 7.5YR 4/6 3 12 -24 10YR 5/4 10YR 6/3 sil 1 m sbk mvfr - .4 .6 I lacks A +4 "; presumptive limit is 0" Boring B oring Boring # X Pit Ground surface elev. 103 ft. Depth to limiting factor ,_� 0 in. Soil Applicati Rat Horizon Depth Dominant Color Redox Description Texture Structure Consistence Boundary Roots GPD /ft i in. Munsell Qu. Sz. Cont. Cola Gr. Sz. Sh. 'Eff#1 Eff #2 �a-(> 1 0 -8 7.5YR 3/1 - sil 1 f -m sbk mvfr cs 1m .4 .6 2 8 -13 7.5YR 3/1 c1d 7.5YR 3/4,5/3 sil 1 m sbk mvfr cs 1m .4 .6 3 i 13 -18 j 10YR 5/4 m2p 7.5YR 4/6,5/3 sil 0 m mfr gs lm 0 .2 4 18 -30 10YR 4/4 c2d 7.5YR 4/6,5/3 sicl 0 m mfi - 0 0 i lacks A +4 "; presumptive limit is 0" — -- - - - - - -- Boring B oring Boring # Pit Ground surface elev. 103.1 ft. Depth to limiting factor 0 in. — Soil Application Rat Horizon Depth Dominant Color Redox Description Texture Structure Consistence Boundary Roots GPD /ft In. Munsell Qu. Sz. Cont. Cola Gr. Sz. Sh. •Eff#1 Effii2 1 0 -3 7.5YR 3/1 - sil 2 m gr mvfr gs l .6 .8 2 3 -10 7.5YR 3/1 f 1f 7.5 f .YR 6/3 YR 3/4 sil 1 m P 1 mvfr cs 1m 4 .6 3 10 -16 10YR 6/3 c2d 7.5YR 4/6 sil 0 m mfr gs 1m + 0 - 2 4 16 -26 I 10YR 5/4 n2p 7.5YR 4/6 sicl 0 m mfi - - 0 0 - lacks A +4 "; presumptive limit is 0" - - - -- -------- - - - - -- Effluent #1 = BOD > 30 < 220 mg /L and TSS >30 < 150 mg /L * Effluent #2 = BOD < 30 mg /L and TSS < 30 mg /L The Department of Commerce is an equal opportunity service provider and employer. If you need assistance to access services or Heed material in an alternate format, please contact the department at 608 - 266 -3151 or TTY 608 -264 -8777. SHIM;3u (R o7,0u) Certified Sail Testing, LLC Property Owner Thompson, Stan Parcel ID # • 034- 1072 -20 -025 — Page 3 of _ 5 _ Boring F�l Boring # Pit Ground surface elev. 98.6 ft. Depth to limiting factor 0 in. x Soil Application Rat Horizon Depth Dominant Color Redox Description Texture Structure Consistence Boundary Roots GPD /ft' in. Munsell Qu. Sz. Cont. Color Gr. Sz. Sh. 'Eff#1 'Eff#2 1 0 -3 7.5YR 3/2 - sl 2 m gr mvfr gs if /m .6 1.0 I 2 3 -12 7.5YR 3/2 - sl 1 m sbk mvfr Cs lm .4 7 3 12 -14 7.5YR 4/3 flf 7.5YR 3/4,5/3 sl 1 m pl mvfr Cw lm 4 6 4 14 -34 7.5YR 4/4 f2d 7.5YR 5/8,5/3 sl 0 m mfr Cw - .2 .6 5 34 -46 7.5YR 4/3 - sl 0 m M I cw j - .2 .6 6 46 72 7.5YR 4/6 f3p 7.5YR 5/8,5/3 s 0 sg ml .7 1.6 H 5 has considerable gr; H6 has lots of sl inclusions w/ f2p 7.5YR 5/8,5/3 redox features; lacks A +4 "; presumptive limit is 0" Fi� Boring Boring # ,\ Pit Ground surface elev. —115 ft. Depth to limiting factor 0 —in Soil Application Rat Horizon Depth Dominant Color Redox Description Texture Structure Consistence Boundary Roots GPD /ft in. Munsell Qu. Sz. Cont. CoIQ Gr. Sz. Sh. 'Eff#1 'Eff#2 t O 1 0 -8 7.5YR 3/2 - sil 2 m gr mvfr gs im .6 .8 2 8 -10 7.5YR 3/2 f1f 7.5YR 3/4,5/3 sil 1 m sbk mvfr cs 1m .4 .6 c2d 10YR 6 sil 1 sbk f 4/6 3 10 - 30 7.5YR 4/4 s m s mf - lOYR 6/3 � I .4 .6 I i i H2 & 3 often part to 1 m pl; lacks A +4 "; pit on highest ground to NE; 2 others similar somewhat lower in same area; presumptive limit is 0 " Fil Boring Boring # Pit Ground surface elev. 98.6 ft. Depth to limiting factor 0 in. Soil Application Rat Horizon Depth Dominant Color Redox Description Texture Structure Consistence Boundary Roots GPD /ftl in. Munsell Qu. Sz. Cont. Cola Gr. Sz. Sh. 'Eff#t •Etf #2 0 9 10YR 3/2 - sil 1 f -m sbk mvfr cs 1m .4 6 2 9 12 10YR 5/3 flf 7.5YR 3/4 sil 1 m sbk mvfr Cs lm 1 .4 .6 10YR 5/3 flf 7.5YR 3/4 sil 1 m sbk mfr Cw 1m ,4 .6 3 12 -19 - - -- - -- f2d 7.5YR 5/8 10YR 6/2 m mvfr - i 4 � 19 -45 7.5YR 4/6 sl O f 6 r 2 t -- H3 parts to 1 f pl; H1 -3 slightly gritty w/ s; H4 has inclusions 7.5YR 5/6 s; lacks A +4 "; presumptive limit is 0" Effluent #1 = BOD > 30 < 220 mg /L and TSS >30 < 150 mg /L ' Effluent #2 = BOD < 30 mg /L and TSS < 30 mg /L The Department of Commerce is an equal opportunity service provider and employer. If you need assistance to access services or need material in an alternate format, please contact the department at 608 - 266 -3151 or TTY 608 - 264 -8777. SId -8 3 w (R 07 /00) Certified Soil Testing, LLC Property Owner Thompson, Stan Parcel ID # 034- 1072 -z0 -025 _ _ Page 4 of _ 5 F Boring Boring # X Pit Ground surface elev. 101.0 ft. Depth to limiting factor 0 in. Soil Application Rat Horizon Depth Dominant Color Redox Description Texture Structure Consistence Boundary Roots • GPD /ft= in. Munsell Qu. Sz. Cont. Cola Gr. Sz. Sh. •Eff#1 'Eff#2 )kb 1 i 10YR 3/2 - sil 1 f -m sbk mvfr cs 1m .4 ,6 2 1 - 17 10YR 4/4 f1f 10YR 6/3 sl 1 m sbk mvfr cs lm .4 .7 3 17 -28 10YR 4/3 - Is 1 m sbk mvfr I cw 1m .7 1.6 4 28 -48 10YR 4/3 f2p 7.5YR 5/8,5/3 sl 0 m mfr cs lm .2 .6 5 48 -57 7.5YR 4/6 - sl 0 m mfi cs lm . .6 6 57 -67 + 10YR 4/6 - fs 0 sg m1 - lm j .5 LO H2 redox around small rocks; H4 has some 7.5YR 5/8 f SS gr; H6 has stratified 10YR 4/4 & 7.5YR 4/4 sl bands; lacks A +4 "; presumptive limit is 0" Effluent #1 = BOD > 30 < 220 mg /L and TSS >30 < 150 mg /L ' Effluent #2 = BOD < 30 mg /L and TSS < 30 mg /L The Department of Commerce is an equal opportunity service provider and employer. If you need assistance to access services or need material in an alternate format, please contact the department at 608 - 266 -3151 or TTY 608 - 264 -8777. silo -s; �a (R 07!00) Certified Soil Testing, LC i Yl � r I Q__ i 0-c. L � i wl Z't 2Z-1 - -1 6 6,4) 1 I x $ �1 i 02114/2006 TUB 8: 59 PAX 715 386 4687 ST CROIX CO RBt3 OF DBBDS Qj002 /003 VOL I8 PACSE 4706 KAT H. D - 1�FAIST R OF DEEDS ST. CROIX CO.. MI REC EIVED FOR RECORD 02/20/200 12355PK R� FPIKD SURV9T MAP CERTIFIED SURVEY MAP ;AD=- 2 LO-ATEp IN SHE NIZI/4 OF THE NMI /4 THE S�1/4 OF THE NWI /4. THE NWi /4 �� NEI /4 AND THE SW114 OF THE '9/4 O SECT & 32, Tir R15K TOWN OF / S R T ST. CRDIX COLINTV. g19CONSIN_ I 0EM OF TW W 4 OF THE N32. NI. U.C.T. APPROVAL N0. 55 l ' 390'V - �Ooy ASMAWD TO sW55546'E_ OWNIM OF NEI/4 NO NEW LOTS WVE B OWATED. THE -�J_ 4 OF 7FMS MAP A l 8 TO SHOW THEE r7 Q{mQj 1 OF PARCE! OF UhND OWNED 8Y VOB6JGAAFrE7111iCe C ERMM SURVEY KW w . s w PARCEL..TO TW SOM VMS AWED. VOL 14, Pte . 3860. OF L MS LANDS Mal .� TAUGT V..�. M 4" g 00 50•i3E Wa sort w=. 54037 R� — — — — NORTH LIM CI Tl E Mf1 — — — — — I I TW - NL aF -- -- - - -- — — 5 — I/ Ak Fi�55 € — � •_ 60• STALE wTJa00NSF4 SE�BACIC LZ*E F1iON RIC,F(i•-0F -11AV - I'� 35/6.E5' NW CM iod : QitiDt aaiiaTV BuA o?1NG ''TtIALiL �n "IF�1 �`"'�,.1 LOT 1 �� SaYitUf� Fegr I D�Q b RI��F-MAY � 1 2.850 i7 ACIE.SFr Iw r• R I p �j l Pow 1� I I 1f�'tFij i I Ip I I b , . I APPRO10WATH LOCATION I I W a ..a SS8�5938'E l329A2' R_.. -�� 17' �+�' SWTH LMW OF THE NE!/4 OF THE WA/4 �,,, —� ^— 14 — -- NOFRH LL IE OF TFE SEI/i OF TM NWV,4 — — $ I � I I y 4 y � I I !Y �1 \adF I � I • I I � I 1 — j UNP Ann LMICS [ 1O a GRAPHIC SCALE 1'00' -40- ' S7�IGT5� g s � ecSpoN GO�B POBSrioN RM - DDI�CA i. _ (�o5/1S�E mA 4 - n�o�'MA� I' X 18' IPEN PWE WEnM 0 300 600 900 x ---•- - n / 5 BET- TH W. M SFesf 1 OF2 " Vol 18 Page 4706 02/14/2006 TUB 8:54 FAX 715 386 4687 ST CRO=x CO REG OF DEEDS 90003/003 I CERTIFIED SURVEY MAP LOCATED IN THE NEU4 OF THE NW114, THE SE114 OF THE NW7/4, THE NW114 OF THE NE1/4 AND THE SW114 OF THE NE114 OF SECTION 32. T29N, R161N, TOWN OF SPRINGFIELD, ST_ CROIX COUNTY, WISCONSIN. f N A parcel of land located in the NE % of the NW %, the SE % of the NW !a, the NW %of the NE % and the SW % of the NE % of Section 32. T29N. R1 6W, Town of SpdnoW. St. Croix County. Wisconsin, ferdrar described as follows. Beginning ai the N % Comer of said Section 32; thence 889W13'E 66.00' Wong the North Ina of the NE % of said Section 32; tlomm SOCM2 2115.53' parallel with the NorUf,SouU % Sedon One of said Sedion 32; thence N89W32"W 1393.85' to the West Ins of the E % of the NW ! of said Section 32, thence N00°1 2'03'E 2113.51' along said West One 1D the North Brie of the NW % of said Swdm 32. thence 889W48"E 1328.28' along said North fine of the NW %lo the N X Comer of said Section 32 and the point of beginrferg, containing 2,947,$36 square feet ( 67.673 acres ) more or less and being stabW to arty easernerfis. restrictions and covenants of record. AURI M'S CER771�CA7ac r, Joseph W- Gr$tber% PreSreit}req Wie=Wn Lend SYNAyor, hereby am" that by the d"M of 0» amwe, Men Thompson and Alen VobWA I have surveyed and divided ft lands showfh hereon in socordarm with ofkW mow d. QMpler 236.34 of l he Wisoondn SWules, to Tom of Sp rq ield SubdrvWun Ordnanos and the SL Croat Caurdy Subdlvn ion Orolnerm and Met this map and damMoon are a true and correct representation thareot: TH18 WSTRUMENT DRAFTED BY. JOSEPH W. G ANSM DATED 7115 22- DAY OF OCT089:1, 2009. 92EowLFXCEP77ONMRaQMTo us H. tin A Ids and block arc lhsnrthy rdllficOsd eo t mi no caner, posesssar, user, soeneea, er any olt+er perean rhtair Hens 1M► riglttd direct vshkxlar l %m mms Nom or egrim iu enll f+iy►M'aY hdna vritdn the right o&vmy d U.S.H.'r ; it is eri W"W b"Xiod tlwrtt Ihrs restriction c onsfitute a reerrioUon Nx Bra bonetit of the public as provided in s.236.293 &UW, and shat be erdarewAft by the dwareners or lm sedgm. Any acosps OW be dowel only by apedid eom con Any moem alMnrwd by gm4M wm6Ptbn shell be *mdmted end 9rwrled a'ly ftm the aw way prong p oceem; eel peewits are revooebie end revocation is nonoarnransatrxy. The Dgarbnwt or Transportali n has granted a SN■aief EKeeptim to Trans 233 for one fumm puhl - rc wed acosss to bs roapr09 - vrltiin 100 Net of ere Norlh.4outfr'A t wAm Im of $cation 32. now In eaet proprly tine d Lot 1. Addlo rsl band drieiom changes in lard um% or fWm hk ftmypraled(s) may require a pLM rood ineervag n or reloowllon of d6voway(s) to an eilemetve public road at 9ro d9madon d tto deperitra t. MENMNOTM MnillffiMr The pawl slown herheon is wj* d b SW OmM and Tawn tip laws, rlss and regulgli0rrs (i.er , VYbtlartdr, acaess !o parcel, rtirirrrrsn Id ems, eta) 8sfare pudraeeg any parr,! owAnd the 9L Croix Carly ZmM Otiice and Ore Wpro xhft Town Hoard for addca S �a M: N G PREPARED Bl'; % nim momo 1235 C.T.H. `�� � S p►"r — Q NEW RICHMOND, W. 54017 PHONE ( 715) 246 -7529 JOB NO, 03-055 SHEET 2 OF 2 Vol 10 Pago 4706 t 06-ti2.00 FRI 10;51 F91 715 586 4686 ST CR1 C'O ZONING X0(11 ST CRO COUNTY SEPTIC TANK MAINTENANCE AGR.BENMM AND OWNERSHIP CERTIFICATION FORM Owner/Buyer Mai ling Address -7 `� s L{Q z,7 Property Address 4,96 (Verification required from Planning epartment for new construction) II City/State Parcel Identification Number Qom°`C" 1DZ2' 7 LEGAL DES TON Property Location " .V,, � Y,, Sec. 3 T o N - I� Town of Subdivision Lot # Certified Survey Map # l'.Lt1_! L��� ' -u. Volume I Page # Warranty need # _ , 'Volume Page # Spec house ❑ yes ❑ no Lot lines identifiable ❑ yes ❑ no SYSTEM MJ4INTENA.NCE Improper use and maintenanecof your septic system could result in its premature failure to handle wastes. Proper maintenance consists of pumping out the septic tank every tbree years or sooner, if needed by a licensed pumper. Wbat you put into the system can affect the function of the septic tank as a treatment stage in the waste disposal system. The propert y owner agrccs to submit to St. Croix Zoning Department a certification form, signed by the owner and by a master plumber, journeyman plumber, restrictedphunba or a licensed pumper verifying that (1) the on site wastewater f of system is in proper operating condition and/or (2) after inspection and pumping (if necessary), the septic tank is less than 1/3 full of sludge. Uwe, the undersigned have read the above requirements and agree to maintain the private sewage disposal system with the standards set forth, herein, as set by the Department of Commerce and the Department of Natural Resources, State of Wisconsin- Ceztitication stating that your septic system has been maintained rust be completed and returned to the St. Croix County Zoning office within 30 days of the three year exp' on date. SIGNATISR E APPLIC DATE OW1YT<✓R CERTIFICATION I (we) certify that all statements on this form are true to the best of my (our) lmowledgc. I (we) am (arc) the owner($) of e property described abov virtue of a warranty decd recorded in Register of Deeds office. SIGNA F APPLICANT DATE 1' s +s•s• •• +••• �,ny information that is mis- represented may result in the sanitary permit being revoked by the Zoning pepartment •• Include with this application: a stamped warranty deed from the Register of Deeds office a copy of the certified survey trap if reference is made in the warranty deed SE 1 /4 -SW 1/4 e 9 t 585A; i SW 1 /4 -SE 1/4 a SE 1 /4 -SE 1/ a' S azo w., .4 NB , N9A LOTI 9 OUTLOTI yr.n A 1073109 1031!327 449A N9B { ]acm , CSM VOL 11 PG 3 107389 7 ro_... kl A 14241492 6 . I e a 34 - - - - - -- - - - - - -- -- -- - -- -- -- -- -- — .2' 8 M '1""PRUNK 12 .. .. ev. z. NE 1 /4 - NW 1/4 NW 1 /4 1/4 NE 1 /4 - NE 1/4 I I �A 4B3A 463A I 1092/4 IISW265 a 1150/265 LOT 1 CSM 184706 I l e e , s s r e . -•' z .,___..___________ »._.. e.___.. _______ _.__.,_..___ »._...__.__.._____. ICI I �I I;I II IB6, II ' I I . I I SE 1 /4 -NW 1/4 SW 1 /4 -NE 114 SE 114 -NE I/4 1150265 4859 1150265 I I awu I C $ CSM 1 832 I z I 485p 4850 I.: _,._ uFU7 .. 2 I I 490A -20 I'I 2507/186 I I I;I I_I Isl NE U4 -SW 1/4 NW 1/4 -SE 1/4 NE 1 /4-SE 114 495A -10 I I 25231102 4x44 i ? I 1150285 1096/639 I - I I:I I ' I I i I I I I I �I I II I II II SE I /4 -SW 1!4 i SW 1 /4 -SE 1/4 SE 1/4 -SE 1/4 A9]A I 1 I i .9, 9, 908 523 903/106 1096/639 I I I II I'I r - Parcel #: 034 - 1072 -20 -025 02/23/2006 10:17 AM PAGE 1 OF 1 Alt. Parcel #: 32.29.15.483A 034 - TOWN OF SPRINGFIELD Current LX ST. CROIX COUNTY, WISCONSIN Creation Date Historical Date Map # Sales Area Application # Permit # Permit Type 02/20/2004 00 0 Tax Address: Owner(s): O = Current Owner, C = Current Co -Owner MABEL A TR THOMPSON O - THOMPSON, MABEL A TR 2891 HWY 12 WILSON WI 54027 Districts: SC = School SP = Special Property Address(es): ' = Primary Type Dist # Description SC 0231 BALDWIN - WOODVILLE AREA SP 1700 WITC Legal Description: Acres: 37.020 Plat: N/A -NOT AVAILABLE SEC 32 T29N R1 5W 40A NW NE EXC CSM Block/Condo Bldg: 18 -4706 Tract(s): (Sec- Twn -Rng 401/4 1601/4) 32- 29N -15W Notes: Parcel History: Date Doc # Vol /Page Type 02/20/2004 754791 2513/417 TD 02/10/2004 753914 2507/186 EZ -1 07/23/1997 1150/265 QC 07/23/1997 1031/327 TI 2005 SUMMARY Bill #: Fair Market Value: Assessed with: V "jA , 82454 Use Value Assessment 5/9_ (P/Z 1G Valuations Last Changed: 05/26/2005 N � Description Class Acres Land Improve Total State Reason AGRICULTURAL G4 36.020 5,500 0 5,500 NO UNDEVELOPED G5 1.000 50 0 50 NO Totals for 2005: General Property 37.020 5,550 0 5,550 Woodland 0.000 0 0 Lottery Credit Claim Count: 0 Certification Date: Batch #: Specials: User Special Code Category Amount Special Assessments Special Charges Delinquent Charges Total 0.00 0.00 0.00 i ZIMF - �;1�1;1;I;N11;1 j1;1;1;1;t;l;t ttw� �"���"- �uHllltlllltl+li+nini S r { •��OS + I�1 �1�1�1 ;I�Ij17�1�1�1�1� �, 1 Mll M a '� LF/ �� � IJYii��c.�.,!•rri� � 1I���� 1 � 1 • I 1 ' * SE-= -=fit ������������� _ •T 111111111111 t a •• �� I�.. Ililili'i • n • rt�r,`i� I i�i�i�iii4� - _. '� ������ - , • a �� ��' �I .� • I _ i! == 1111111111111 1 w � _ �' ;I'1 .`t • �� " f I I I ; / _ ll��l��ll�{I111'l i�h�i� ill - -_ �: I � I,_ 9d w, LEN E ��_iJ.11lll.11l. s DOCUNIE�11 city CLAIV afte STA VF OF W!SCON� ' IN-FOR'l if I *E RESERVE2 F09 RECOR9104 DATA T'_:$ PAZ J Y 7111S INDENTURE, Made this ---- day of ST. i,t?C)jX Co VVI A. D., 19 between d3y J__ -A. 1 92� 7 M. --_—_--- of the hrct part, and R--71sr5r of part of the second part. RETURN TO Witnesseth, That the mid par t of the first part. f an-i in of the sum of - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Dollars, t-) in hand piid by z 9aid p_ut . 1-., f the second part. tl receipt whereof :5 herehy c0nff-ssed anti ackncwledgt_ ha an te bar - in remi-ittd, a_�_A, and quit-claimed, a by these presentij do gi v n, gr g -A ed gr, barg-iin, sell, release a. quit-,:!airn unto the �aicf part secor d a's 9 foie of the . d part, and to --- heirs an . ign ver, tne I following letscribed real estate, sit r"t-d ;n t he county of "at - -Croi-x and Stite of Wiscontiin, to-wit. �he 'Iest half (1/2) of the Northeast :�uarter (1/4 The luarter oO the Northwest u. (1/4 The Northwest Southeast (luarter (13) Of t ')Outhea5t - iiarter (1/4) all in section thirty two (32) in Township tventy .41ne (29) North Range fifteen (15) 'lest Gontaiijing Two Hundred (200) acfes Also the Northeast ( uarter of the Southwest Also a strip of land two (2) rods wide 01 the Not-th side of the lorthejst 'aatter (1/1 of the Southeast ^� (1/4) of 32-29-15. a �2- To Have and To Hold t�e same, together with all aml singular the appurtenances and p-i%ileges tiiereunto belonging rr in aw.wise the+mte) appertaining, and all the estate, right, title, interest and claim whatsoever of the said part , I-- of the first part, eit�er �n law equi y, either in possession or expectancy of, to the on:y proper use, l benefit and behoof of the �aid pirt 4 a x t::e ernnd part- heirs and assigns forever. I n WJ tn�ms Whereof, the said par* y- r ' the first part ha Z hereun to set �ajid and sea) this dAY Of A. D., �N IN PRESENCE OF __�(SEAL Kd A tt `7 C ar c Ti E A L) STATE OF WISCONSIN, 3t Croix G)unty. Pponalty lwti nie, 2 1, the abovi-. named T- A J to me known to be the person ---,Yho execut. !i�! iorezf4 Acknow!edget�A" t,arne,( w. e4 'rhis instrument draited by C Notary Public County �V;s, NI v Co m n i ission (F x pi res) 1 , 1 %t P r (Section 59.51 M of the Wisconeta Statrut" pwoytd-� ZU Inatrutnents to be r*corded shall haw* P,Alnk� VVi8ted or typev"Itten thereots the nsnjet of the iLrantont, 2rantees. writnesees *n4 aot As. 4i�j QUIT CLAM DrED-STATE OF WISCONSIN. FOFLM. NO. It p Sat ety and Buildings 4003 N KINNEY COULEE RD commerce.wi.gov LACROSSE WI 54601 -1831 ■ TDD #: (608) 264 -8777 tisconsin www.commerce.wi.gov /sb/ Department of Commerce CA www.wisconsin.gov 0 Jim Doyle, Governor f d P. Burke, Secretary January 20, 2006 OCT 0 8 2006 CUST ID No. 222774 ATTN: POWTS In pectg-. CROIX COUNTY HENRY F GROTE ZONING OFFICE CERTIFIED SOIL TESTING ST CROIX COUNTY SPIA E4366 353RD AVE 1101 CARMICHAEL RD MENOMONIE WI 54751 HUDSON WI 54016 CONDITIONAL APPROVAL PLAN APPROVAL EXPIRES: 01/20/2008 Identification Numbers Transaction ID No. 1230798 SITE: Stan Thompson Site ID No. 708803 Town of Springfield, St Croix County Please refer t4 both idertitfirataon numbers, NW 1/4, NE 1/4, S32, T29N, R15W above; in-all'corres oncienpe with the a enc :. FOR: Object Type: POWTS Component Manual Regulated Object ID No.: 1058039 Maintenance required; 450 GPD Flow Rate System(s): Mound Component Manual - Version 2.0, SBD- 10691 -P (N.01 /01), and Pressure Distribution Component Manual - Version 2.0, SBD- 10706 -P (N.01 /01) The submittal described above has been reviewed for conformance with applicable Wisconsin Administrative Codes and Wisconsin Statutes. The submittal has been CONDITIONALLY APPROVED. The owner, as defined in chapter 101.01(10), Wisconsin Statutes, is responsible for compliance with all code requirements. No person may engage in or work at plumbing in the state unless licensed to do so by the Dept. per s.145.06, stats. The following conditions shall be met during construction or installation and prior to occupancy or use 1. This system is to be constructed and located in accordance with the approved plans and with the "Pressure Distribution Component Manual for Private Onsite Wastewater Treatment Systems Version 2.0" SBD - 10706 -P (N.01101). 2. This system is to be constructed and located in accordance with the approved plans, and the "Mound Component Manual for Private Onsite Wastewater Systems Version 2.0" SBD - 10691- P(N.01 /01). 3. Pursuant to outlet filter product approval stipulations, maintenance information must be given to the owner of the POWTS explaining that periodic cleaning of the septic tank outlet filter is required. The access opening used to service the filter shall terminate at or above finished grade with a watertight cover. 4. Proper landscaping of the mound and land surface up slope of the mound is critical to proper mound performance and operation. See the approved plans for details. 5. This approval is based in part on an interpretive determination approved pursuant to s. Comm 85.60(2), Wis. Adm. Code and recorded under transaction number 1231007. It is subject to the conditions set forth in that approval. A copy of the approved plans, specifications and this letter shall be on -site during construction and open to inspection by authorized representatives of the Department, which may include local inspectors. All permits required by the state or the local municipality shall be obtained prior to commencement of construction /installationioperati on. In granting this approval the Division of Safety & Buildings reserves the right to require changes or additions should conditions arise making them necessary for code compliance. As per state stats 101. 12(2), nothing in this review shall relieve the designer of the responsibility for designing a safe building, or component. gn , p tY Lm g g p HENRY F GROTE Page 2 1/20/2006 Inquiries concerning this correspondence may be made to me at the telephone number listed below, or at the address on this letterhead. The above left addressee shall provide a copy of this letter to the owner and any others who are responsible for the installation, operation or maintenance of the POWTS. Sincerely, Fee Required $ 175.00 Fee Received $ 175.00 Balance Due $ 0.00 eroy G ansky, stewater ecialist Integrated Services Bureau WISMART code: "7 (715) 726 -2544 Voice (715) 726 -2549 Fax Leroy.Jansky@ Wisconsin. Gov w Stan Thompson - Mound Construction Materials and Techniques All materials must comply with Comm 84 and be installed in accordance with manufacturer's specifications. Construction methods must comply with the following Component Manuals: RECEIVED JAN - 9 2006 Mound, SBD- 10691 -P (01/01) Pressure Distribution, SBD - 10706 -P (01 /O1) SAFETY & BUILDINGS 12 3 0 7 9 8 P.O.IIV.T.S. Location: NW ' /4, NE' /4, Sec. 32, T 29 N, R 15 W Conditionally Town: Springfield APPPROVED County: St. Croix DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE DIVI i0N OF SAFETY AND BUILDINGS Date: January 10, 2006 Owner: Stan Thompson SEE C RESP DENC Address: 2867 H 12 p N S/ ��. Wilson, WI 54027 G. N Designer: He y Grote e 9 _ Signature: MSN License: WI D 1699- 07 � /�� �E S;G``�� Attachments: SBD -10577 - Plan Approval Application SBD -8330 Page 1: cover 2: design criteria & calculations 3: plot plan 4: system cross section 5: plan view, lateral detail 6: pump tank exit detail 7: pump curve 8: system management page 1 of 8 i Design Criteria Residential Wastewater Contaminant Load: 30 mg/L < BOD < 220 mg/L Anticipated septic tank effluent 30 mg/L < TSS < 150mg /L Fecal Coliform > 10,000 cfu/100 mL Fats, oils, grease < 30 mg/L Bedrooms x 100 gal/bedroom/day x 1.5 6 �%_fl gallons /day hydraulic load Design Calculations In situ designed loading rate n b gallons /sq. ft. per day Depth to estimated high ground water �� `l in. Depth to bedrock Z in. Cross slope at system • Z_ % Force main length ° ft. of in. Manifold/header length ft. of in. Drain -back gallons Lateral length @ ft. of \ "Z- in. Lateral elevation 3 o ft. @ bottom of lateral Lateral hole size � in. @ b o in. ( 3, ft.) Spacing z holes /lateral holes total Lateral volume gallons Total lateral discharge rate gallons /minute @ 2 ' ft. head Network pressure compensation losses ft. Elevation difference �' S� ft. Friction loss ` ft. @ gallons /minute Total dynamic head ft. Pump /sij*on 1 '� gpm @ 1 z- ft. of head Manufacturer l'� �. 0. �: C_ Model # S 3 O Dose volume gallons Lift/siffion tank Co gallons Septic tank gallons Effluent filter -k o-o cs-v/ o Y V 'LZ- 14 G () Measurement pump on and off 5 ` ° in. Height alarm from tank bottom in. - Reserve capacity gallons specs.calcs.res Page �' of g c ` � z o Oro 1 l Yl • Zo 2,u I�UC � � ` , (�' oa''�w � gt4l i k � r- w. rr a O � 0 L - 4L CL 0161 u " t 3 y oe.1( �s tall 0. 0 61h Mt 103.E > Ql WT fat -r,� b o p t 1 M 1 e wav 1 06 %0%. V :ems NZ � '4t— Zo, co' � 3,0� � 13•x' �,S' �s' 1 3.0' 3,�' I 3,�' i I 3 I l c l l ( ) ow `: M L `V e�a, �����a•c.� - 4•�.�� �.. "� �r alp `moo f h r X i Y 1J Q �.; I �� on WE4TNERPRO,)� LOCKING COVfiR Gt/An'N 1N(; .( //BE� . r ✓ QwCK DI4COV ---1 Grade, elev. -- -� �. .� 4" PVC sch A 40, 3' onto r.4" PVC solid ground u 2D TA). Sch 40 II vent MAx I I 3. � ' 1� r i 'Y4 n wE['p 4P�ROvLo I i 4" PVC 4A 4 T 3bNT'J J �FFLE / `son 40, r4LL. G;rS, p 1 (� AL 3' onto r� UT � o ' �^ `^^/ •T p N _ solid 1 ground C �S •S� � �� C7 v^eh�� 4� P urlP ', C o•rce �'� 1 Lv 6LOCK SCPr,C 5PECIFI•CATI� DOSC T�ti'K`. /`�AUUFACTUi,CR: �' 1JLMBCR OF DOSES: S b _ per day TASK SIZE � GALLOWS DOSE VOLUME AL ARY1 PW4UFAC7 URCR: S `� `'-�Y� INCLUDING 6ACKFI.OW: Gallons 1"\0OCL QUNCER: \ e \4 -,,-3 CAPACITIES; A = O W�^HES CR ti35 Z J gallons SwiTCH TyPC: �3.SZ allons PUMP r,AUUFACTURC ;� "° Z C a S ` o wCwES pR ��' gallons /'MODC L �JUMDCR S N�r S� I R I D ■ INCHES Oa so S S 4 Z gallons WOTE: PUMP AWD ALARM ARE TO Bc Mi►JIMUM 01SCFIA RATE G ►M INSTALL[O 01J SEPARA?E circuits CRT.CAI. DIFFCK. 1JC[ DETWCEW PU" OFF A►JD OIJTRIDUTIOW PIPC,. FCCT k' MUM ►JCTWORK SUPPLY PRECLURE 2 '� FUT" ° '�� FEET OF FORCE MAIN X � f X10oFLFRICTIOW FACTOK. 0'� FEET 2 � TOTAL O'JWAMIC. HEAD = FF.[r II 3 IuTER�IA�, DIMEIJ6�O/JC ' Of TA►JK: LEWC.TH ;WIDTH , Llqulo O 6 C c r• R + E ng i neer i ng • Pump Chara Performance Data ► /lbly LWI s�nwslill, , T • As,toweNt "s SNIF30A1 somopmw .30 Nil l•ad Apps MSoler 7ype P61414 ) It. PAL pm" 0 1 t 10 ... ........ .�.__ ..•... _..__. _.., rt. _ ._....... Vek llS Heel 60 I I kmpwttwo 1201 As•WW cgar,us la t 10 NEIAA DOslpn A LW OW hseietloe Gees A thccMor She I -1 /2• N (JEl�ra) Total N� ht+t 4 i 12 16 ZO 44 Solids Hoe&q 3/4 (141w•) d'M �'s•� 44 S� 2' 23 12 0 Ugly Wolgit 30 bs. ►OWSf Cord 16/3, ST W, 40' st1. Dim*nsional Data AA Materials of Construction — r'" '" (mW4iv ` *�` .w1 ,,.s, Cad w«wm'4 v,. (a�orallmeetl MF NeMllO Sle>.lese 510") r•,vt wry :111 nr1 �f��� ns1 •.,n 7. Nw kr (omhOw" pup,w Lubt Cm OWKk 01 yl u,b f" Motor H C• ke■ o •Iur c,:w+�os 'W wt F"Ap COW k" oes (40 4. werwr++ t n 4pm10 wOwss>d spsdfaso'o AU mike. Seel Foul: Celtic• /Cetadc /, �.,+ SAaft S.al Swi Udyt A0? &W St" S'r1 S"11 Stow 11 I l k wss h� w r E * ,r cx n Gst M•e Sleew ,r.,n Low* R•w WI — temm Hill f Stk LOP W 111*ot omit Festoeets I Steidess Seel — ,t."• 1999 H dro=64' Pumps. Ashlaro, Chio. A! R' fs Remved. 1� HYDRCMATIC W - Your Awfhor,zrd Lo:d Diuriburor - • 1 840 Barr Rwd AsHand, Oho 44105 W: 419.289.3042 Fix 419. 111-4017 Wob Site: www.pentdrpunp tom T ..", SALES CIFFKIS IN ALL FRAJOR CRIES ANC COUNTRIES•m w: w.u2 1204 sM 'ism V �' Poor System Management Management of this system is critical. As a condition of approval of these plans this system management section must be reviewed with the owner, and the owner must be provided with a complete set of plans including this management section. If problems develop with the adsorption system or any other system components, the installing plumber or the St. County Zoning Office, 715- 386 -4680, should be contacted for assistance. General Proper functioning of an on -site disposal system, "septic system," is significantly dependent on the volume of water which flows into the system and the level of contaminants in that volume. The lower the volume of water and the lower the level of contaminants, the better and longer the system will function. Typical system components include a septic tank or compartment to settle out solids and contain greases and oils, a filter on the outlet of the septic tank to retain small particles of the same density as water, a dose tank or compartment to allow a dose to be accumulated, a pump and controls or automatic siphon, and finally some type of soil adsorption cell to recycle the water in a manner to protect ground water quality and public health. I . If the septic tank is installed prior to sheet -rock and /or painting, pump the septic tank before normal use begins to ensure adherence to contaminant load design criteria. 2. Install water- saving appliances whenever and wherever possible. 3. Repair even small water leaks as soon as possible. 4. Never pour grease or oil down any drain or stool. 5. Garbage disposals are not recommended; if you must have one, use it sparingly 6. No paper products other than tissue should go into the system. 7. No chemicals should go into the system. 8. Avoid surge flows of water; try to spread laundry throughout the week. 9. Septic tank effluent must be less than or equal to the design criteria specified in page 2 of these plans. 10. If septic or dose tanks are no longer used, they must be properly abandoned. 11. If construction timing and weather could create a frozen infiltration system, weather - proofing with plastic sheeting and heavy mulching may be required to maintain a functional system at start-up. 12. The upslope toe of the mound system must be landscaped with additional fill to blend this area into the upslope natural grade; this will minimize the possibility of the system trapping surface run -off; final settled slope should be 2 -3% over the system or 2 -3% diverting surface run -off around the ends of the system. Maintenance 1. The septic tank must be inspected every three years by a properly licensed person. 2. If necessary, the septic tank must be pumped to remove solids and scum; pumping is required if the combined scum and solids volume equals one third of the tank volume. 3. When the septic tank is pumped, any solids in the bottom of the dose tank must be pumped, and the filter must be back - washed into the septic tank to remove accumulated material. System use may require more frequent filter cleaning; initial inspections of the filter should be made every 6 months until a minimum time sequence is determined. 4. Periodic observation pipe inspections should be made by the owner to examine the state of the in -situ soil adsorption cell. Quarterly inspections are recommended; a licensed plumber should be notified if effluent is consistently ponded in the adsorption cell. 5. If this system contains specific treatment components other than those mentioned here, maintenance requirements will accompany their specifications. 6. The pumping components for this system include an alarm which must be installed and remain on a separate circuit from the pump. If the alarm is activated, minimize water use and notify a licensed plumber for service as soon as possible. The system allows reserve capacity to accumulate some necessary flow until normal service can be restored; this volume is minimal, and no more than one or two days should pass before any necessary repairs can be made. 7. Avoid compaction such as vehicle traffic within 15' down -slope of the adsorption system. 8. Avoid disturbing the system itself such that might encourage erosion or disturb the required seeding of the system. 9. Particularly avoid winter traffic such as sliding or snowmobiling which might compact snow and lead to increased frost depth. 10. Surface drainage must be diverted around the system; avoid landscape changes which might send surface run -off into the system area. 1 l . Warning: Do not enter septic, dose or other treatment tanks; death may result because they may contain lethal gases or insufficient oxygen. Contingency Plan Wastewater monitoring of volume and quality is not a normal requirement for low effluent strength systems; such monitoring may become necessary if problems develop. Any necessary monitoring shall be done in accord with the requirements of Comm 83.54 (2). Pumping and hauling of wastewater may be necessary while analysis and repairs are implemented. Additional testing, designing, and /or installation of additional treatment components or conversion to a holding tank may be necessary. Page 8 of 8 Safety and Buildings 4003 N KINNEY COULEE RD commerce.wi.gov LA CROSSE WI 54601 -1831 ■ TDD #: (608) 264 -8777 s c O n sin www.commerce.wi.gov /sb/ i t i c epartm of Commerce www.wisconsin.gov Jim Doyle, Governor Mary P. Burke, Secretary January 20, 2006 CUST ID No. 222774 A7TN.• POWTS Inspector HENRY F GROTE ZONING OFFICE CERTIFIED SOIL TESTING ST CROIX COUNTY SPIA E4366 353RD AVE l 101 CARMICHAEL RD MENOMONIE WI 54751 HUDSON WI 54016 CONDITIONAL APPROVAL PLAN APPROVAL EXPIRES: 01/20/2008 .;'Identification Nubers• Transaction ID No. 1231007 SITE: Stan Thompson Site ID No. 708803 Town of Springfield, St Croix County Rlease refer to both i�ienfi�Eicat}on, numbers, NW 1/4, NE 1/4, S32, T29N, R15W above; in ail cones ondenee with the ag ency, FOR: Object Type: Soil Saturation Determination Regulated Object ID No.: 1058162 The submittal described above has been reviewed for conformance with applicable Wisconsin Administrative Codes and Wisconsin Statutes. The submittal has been CONDITIONALLY APPROVED. The owner, as defined in chapter 101.01(10), Wisconsin Statutes, is responsible for compliance with all code requirements. The following conditions shall be met during construction or installation and prior to occupancy or use: 1. Approval is hereby granted pursuant to s. Comm 85.60(2), Wis. Adm. Code, to estimate the depth to seasonal soil saturation based on an interpretive determination process. Approval of the interpretive determination negates the requirement in s. Comm 85.30(2)(b), Wis. Adm. Code to designate the ground surface as the highest level of soil saturation when redoximorphic features are less than 4 inches below the bottom of the A horizon. 2. The estimated highest level of prolonged soil saturation approved under this determination is six inches below grade. At least 30 inches of sand lift on top of six inches of unsaturated, in -situ soil is required for adequate treatment and dispersal. 3. The basal soil application rate for the mound shall be 0.20 gpd/sf, and the linear loading rate 3.75 gpd/ft. 4. Chisel plowing to a depth of 16 inches immediately prior to sand placement is required to improve vertical water movement into the soil solum. 5. Landscaping up slope of the mound shall be incorporated into the POWTS design to prevent surface water from concentrating along the up slope edge of the mound and to divert surface water drainage away from the system. 6. This approval shall remain valid unless the site is altered in such a way that the depth to soil saturation would change or if saturated conditions are observed for seven consecutive days at depths less than 3 feet below the infiltrative surface of the POWTS distribution component. 7. This approval in no way relinquishes the use of color patterns to estimate the depth to high groundwater on any other parcels or portions of parcels. 8. A copy of this approval letter and attachments must accompany the mound system design for this site for purposes of plan approval and sanitary permit issuance. If the Interpretive Determination Report was accompanied with a plan and an expiration date is shown on this letter, the expiration date only applies to the plans for the design, not to the decision on the Interpretive Determination Report. HENRY F GROTE Page 2 1/20/2006 A copy of the approved plans, specifications and this letter shall be on -site during construction and open to inspection by authorized representatives of the Department, which may include local inspectors. If plan index sheets were submitted in lieu of additional full plansets, a copy of this approval letter and index sheet shall be attached to plans that correspond with the copy on file with the Department. All permits required by the state or the local municipality shall be obtained prior to commencement of construction /installationbperation. If this construction project will disturb one or more acres of land, an Erosion Control Notice of Intent (NOI) shall be filed with the department 14 days prior to any earth disturbing activities. In granting this approval the Division of Safety& Buildings reserves the right to require changes or additions should conditions arise making them necessary for code compliance. As per state scats 101.12(2), nothing in this review shall relieve the designer of the responsibility for designing a safe building, structure, or component. Inquiries concerning this correspondence may be made to me at the telephone number listed below, or at the address on this letterhead. Sincerely, Fee Required $ 100.00 Fee Received $ 100.00 Balance Due $ 0.00 Leroy G Integrated Services Bureau W.,;iSN1AR3 code:.' "633 (715) 726 -2544 Voice (715) 726 -2549 Fax Ijansky@commerce.state.wi.us i I I r 1231007'1 Interpretive Determination Report For an A +0" Mound Septic System p O.W.T.S. Conditionally On the ArrROVED DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE Stan Thompson property DIV SION OF SAFETY AND BUILDINGS Pending CSM from northwest cornefE RRESP DENC NW /4, NE /4, Section 32, T 29 N, R 15 W Town of Springfield St. Croix County, Wisconsin Submitted by RECEIVED JAN - 9 2006 Henry F. Grote, CSTM 222774 SAFETY & BUILDINGS Certified Soil Testing, LLC E. 4366 353 Ave. Menomonie, WI 54751 715- 233 -0398 Contents Page Introduction 1 Methods 1 Local Hydrology 2 Geomorphology 3 Soil Disturbance and Hydraulic Modification 3 Landscape Position 3 Soil Series 5 Data 6 Conclusions /Recommendations 6 Attachments Soil Evaluation Report, Henry F. Grote Topographic Detail, Section 32, T 29 N, R 15 W Soil Series Map, Soil Survey of St. Croix County i Interpretive Determination Report for an A +0" Mound Septic System on the Stan Thompson Property Introduction On November 7, 2005 Henry F. Grote, CSTM 222774, Certified Soil Testing, conducted a Soil and Site Evaluation on the Stan Thompson property for the purpose of establishing the potential for an onsite wastewater dispersal system. These evaluations were conducted on a proposed parcel to be created from the northwest corner of the forty acre property described as the NW '/4 of the NE' /4 of Section 32, T 29 N, R 15 W, Town of Springfield, St. Croix County, Wisconsin. Methods Soil color, texture, structure, consistence and redoximorphic features have been evaluated and reported on the accompanying Soil Evaluation Report in accordance with guidelines under Comm 85 of the Wisconsin Administrative Code. Pertinent information has been abstracted from the Soil Survey of St. Croix County, Wisconsin. Topographic detail has been obtained from the DeLorme 3 -1) TopoQuads CD mapping release. Field investigation included eleven backhoe pits with soil profiles documented on the attached Soil Evaluation Report. Rod and transit elevations were obtained at pertinent pit locations, along a tentative design contour line, and over twenty foot grid intervals to allow the insertion of nominal contour lines on the detailed plot plan. Previous' work on the east end of the eighty acres of which this parcel is a part showed soils which lacked A +4" and resulted in a state on -site investigation which confirmed suitability for an A +0 mound. ' Henry Grote, Stan & Mabel Thompson, 1/5/02 report for NE' /4 of NE' /4 of Sec. 32, T 29 N, R 15 W and Jansky inspection report of April 30, 2002. 2 Customer has not requested preparation and submittal of interpretive report for the NE ' / 4 of the NE '/4. f Local Hydrology The major local hydrology input is from annual precipitation. This is estimated at from 29.57 inches to 31.5 inches. Surface runoff is an additional input most significantly during heavy precipitation events. The proposed mound site and upslope land use is currently hay crop ground. The upslope ground extends about 100 feet north and east of north of the proposed system area and can be expected to adsorb significant volumes of precipitation during the growing season when most of the precipitation occurs. Upslope topography then is almost flat to slightly downslope to the north for about 100 yards towards the right of way to Highway 12. Larger scale upslope topography shows a gradual rise to the east for about 1/8 mile. Due to the convex, nose slope orientation of the proposed site, upslope toe landscaping to divert surface runoff to the west and southeast is the preferred method of minimizing adverse impact on mound performance due to excessive surface drainage. Dense glacial till beneath a shallow loess cap provides significant groundwater protection from possible surface contamination. Water outputs consist of surface runoff, soil infiltration, and evapotranspiration. Surface runoff will generally be minimal unless frozen soil conditions or excessively heavy and prolonged precipitation occurs. Soil infiltration is described as "somewhat poorly drained" for typical Skyberg series soils. This is reasonable for the observed moderately and weakly structured silt loam and sandy loam A horizons; the B horizons are generally weakly structured with textures varying from sandy loams to silt loams Restrictive, massive, sandy loam and sandy clay loam till units were observed at depths below 14 to 28 inches. Slower infiltration is anticipated during wet spring periods when the soils are closer to field capacity and slow to dry. The underlying massive till unit will be significantly restrictive to vertical infiltration. Lateral movement of water through more permeable upper horizons will be facilitated by the 7.8 to 8.2 percent cross slopes below a proposed 100.0 contour design line. Heavy and prolonged precipitation - 2.5 ' Soil Survey of St. Croix County, United States Department of Agriculture, Soil Conservation Service, July 1987, p 139. (River Falls, WI data) a Wisconsin Average Annual Precipitation (1961- 1990), www.crh.noaa.gov /mkx/data/wipcpn.gif 5 Soil Survey of St. Croix County, United States Department of Agriculture, Soil Conservation Service, July 1987, p. 57. 2 inches in 24 hours; described as once in two years - will also slow infiltration as the A horizons near field capacity. Evapotranspiration will be a significant factor during the growing season but of no value during the winter season Geomorphology Limestone bedrock underlies most of St. Croix County. Typically the limestone is sandwiched between layers of sandstone which is then overlaid with glacial till forming the principal soil parent material. Rockian till, correlated with the first sub -stage of Wisconsin glaciation, is the parent till for Skyberg soils. The Rockian till is overlain by a thin concurrent and/or post - glaciation loess cap. Soil Disturbance and Hydraulic Modification The proposed mound location is uniform topography. Land use was hay crops in 2005; minimal recent tillage and significant root penetration have enhanced soil structure. The upper B horizon exhibited weak platy structure in one pit profile which is a possible artifact of tillage but is as likely a result of the natural deposition process of loess soils. Hydraulic conductivity of the solum can — and should be — improved by deep chisel plowing to a depth of at least sixteen inches. Landscape Position The landscape position of the proposed mound site is on the western slope near the midpoint point of the west end of a glacial ground moraine. The proposed location, along the 100.0 contour, is located on mapped Skyberg soils in a classic "nose" landscape, convex orientation. The 100.0 contour is located on a south slope with small scale cross slopes slightly west of south at 7.8 to 8.2% although the general slope of the moraine is to the west. The moraine rises to the east to a nominal elevation of 1280 MSL, about 'A mile south of Highway 12, just east of 290" G Soil Survey of St. Croix County, United States Department of Agriculture, Soil Conservation Service, July 1987, p 140. 3 I St., almost '/2 mile east of the 100.0 contour which is at a nominal elevation of 1210 MSL. The moraine slopes from just above the 100.0 contour about'' /2 a mile to the west; natural surface drainage is to the south of the 100.0 contour about 120 feet to a shallow surface drainage feature which trends west about'' /2 mile, and into the Eau Galle River at a nominal elevation of 1142 MSL. Typical wetland vegetation is evident along and immediate) south of the surface drainage Yp g g Y e g feature south of B -2. A shallow surface drainage feature, which appears to be an old dead furrow, impacts the east end of the proposed site just above pit B -8. The B -8 location was profiled with some anticipation of possible indicators of excess soil hydraulic loading, but redoximorphic features were not observed there above 9 inches. This dead furrow slopes uphill about 1/8 mile to the east with a cross slope to the south over the whole run which likely minimizes flow to the west. Landscaping to the east end of the proposed mound structure must divert potential surface drainage to the south, away from the system. No structures are down -slope to interfere with lateral movement of effluent. The 7.8% to 8.2% slopes at the mound site will increase the hydraulic gradient and encourage lateral movement of treated effluent. Upslope surface runoff can — and should — be minimized by landscaping fill up- slope of the system. The upslope toe of the proposed system should be extended with additional fill such that surface runoff is diverted to the west and southeast and ultimately around the west and southeast ends of the mound. The small scale cross slopes at the proposed mound location combined with the available length are significant reasons to favor this location. Enhanced lateral effluent movement plus low linear oca on. E a ed g p loading are excellent indicators of good system performance for an A +0 mound system. 4 Soil Series The Soil Survey of St. Croix County maps the site soils as Skyberg Series close to the boundary of both Magnor and Amery Series upslope to the east. These soils are respectively described as "somewhat poorly drained" ( Skyberg), "somewhat poorly drained" (Magnor), and "well drained" (Amery). Field observations of soil pits are in reasonable agreement with these mappings. All three series are Alfisols; Families vary from Coarse -loamy mixed (Amery) to Fine -loamy mixed (Magnor) to Fine -loamy mixed, mesic ( Skyberg); subgroups are Typic Glossoboralfs (Amery) to Aquic Glossoboralfs (Magnor) to Udollic Ochraqualfs ( Skyberg). Field observations show redoximorphic features absent to depths of 9 -12 inches in four pits representative of the proposed mound site. The B horizon redoximorphic features in the system area were typically few and faint but common and distinct in one pit below the observed A -2 horizon. Periodic soil saturation is indicated below 9 inches by these observations. Pits 6 and 9 show soil profiles more characteristic of the upslope Amery soils in that subsoil profiles consist of sand and loamy sand horizons below the heavier upper soil profiles of silt loam and sandy loam. These profiles are a significant reason for choosing this area over possible sites explored by the seven other soil pits at differing topographic locations. The Amery soils are described as formed in areas of pitted drift which are typically formed by the third sub -stage of Wisconsin glaciation, the Cary till. It is possible that these sandy subsoils were formed by the influence of this later glaciation sub -stage over the older Rockian sub - stage. More likely they were formed by erosional deposition from the upslope mapped Amery soils. In either case the better drained, sandy subsoils add weight to the conclusion that a successful A +0 mound can be installed in this area. Clyde Series soils are mapped in the drainage way located some one hundred plus feet to the south of the proposed mound location. 5 Data The soil and site evaluation report and data are similar to other sites which have received Department of Commerce approvals for A +0" mounds with a minimum of six inches of seasonally unsaturated soils in the upper A horizon. Examples include the Lisa Mosentine site, ID #636612, Anthony Ludwig site, ID #634143, Jon Mentink site, ID #787909, Tim Holldorf site, ID # 849265, and Karen & Keith Anderson site, ID #639788. Conclusions/Recommendations 1. Seasonally saturated soil conditions do not occur in the upper 9 inches of the soil profile as indicated by the absence of redoximorphic features. 2. The A horizon in the proposed system area is Munsell color 7.5YR 3/2 to l OYR 3/2 which indicates an organic matter content nominally of 25 g /kg in the range of 20 -30 g /kg or 2.5 percent. This level of organic matter is indicative of relatively good drainage and aerobic conditions. 3. The relatively low level of organic matter indicated by the Munsell value of 3 would facilitate observation of high chroma redoximorphic features in the A horizon. The general lack of observation of these features in the A horizons is strengthened by the low organic matter content which lends further evidence to a conclusion that at least nine inches of soil is present which is not periodically saturated for more than seven days; while 4. Site conditions did allow the observation of redoximorphic features in a down -slope pit (pit 2) located 95 feet below the 100.0 contour, at an elevation of 96.4, which showed an organic rich A horizon, 7.5YR 3/1 Munsell, with few, fine faint observed redoximorphic features in the lower four inches; which 5. Adds weight to the conclusion that nine inches of suitable soil are found at the proposed 100.0 elevation. 8 Tyler presentation, Reading Shallow Soil Saturation, 10/15/04, Ashland UW Ag Research Station. 6 6. No hydric soil indicators are present in the observed system area soil pits; this conclusion is based on particularly careful review of the indicators for All Soils and Loamy and Clayey Soils; however 7. Pit 2, 130 feet down -slope of the system area, does meet hydric indictor F6, Redox Dark Surface, with a matrix value of 3 and a chroma of 1; this pit is located in the shallow surface drainage feature. 8. System area pits demonstrate root penetration to depths of 14 -67 inches; such depths are not expected in soils which remain saturated for significant time periods. 9. The small scale cross slopes of 7.8% to 8.2% indicate excellent potential for lateral movement of effluent down -slope into the more permeable upper soil horizons and away from the mound system without surface ponding. 10. The available length which allows for a 120 foot long rock cell gives a low linear loading rate of 3.75 gallons per day per foot which enhances the ability of the system to allow effluent to infiltrate the in situ soils. 11. The site is acceptable for a mound septic system with a minimum of six inches of unsaturated soil for treatment and dispersal of treated wastewater effluent as allowed by Comm 83.44(3)(b)l. The observed nine inches of redoximorphic -free natural soil will allow treated effluent to be assimilated into the subsurface without ponding on the ground surface. 12. Site preparation requires mowing and removal of as much vegetation as possible followed by deep chisel plowing to at least a 16 inch depth. 13. Additional fill landscaping soil shall be added to the upslope area of the mound structure filling the concave, upslope area between the west and southeast system ends. The final, settled slope of this landscape fill shall be at least 2% to the west and southeast such that any near- system surface drainage will be diverted around the southeast end to the south, and around the west end to the west and southwest. 14. Landscaping to the east of the east end of the system, in conjunction with the above upslope landscaping, must ensure that any surface drainage following the existing dead 9 Field Indicators of Hydric Soils in the United States, A Guide for Identifying and Delineating Hydric Soils, Version 4.0 (March 1998), p5 ff, 13 ff, & 20 ff.; p 16 for F6 indicator. 7 r furrow is diverted to the south to further minimize the adverse impact of natural surface drainage on the system. 15. Mound construction requires 2.5 feet of ASTM C -33 sand lift immediately placed on the freshly plowed ground surface. Construction must take place under relatively dry conditions. This depth of sand creates an effective sand filter and can be expected to produce a treated effluent with less than 30 mg /L of both BOD5 and TSS and fecal coliform concentrations of <10,000 cfu/100mL. 16. Site observations indicate that a minimum of 2.25 feet of sand fill is required; however 2.5 feet is recommended to ensure a conservative design and maximize system longevity. 17. The rock cell in the mound structure shall be 3.75' by 120 for a linear loading rate of 3.75 gallons per day per foot for a three bedroom residence. 18. The sand basal area loading must be a maximum of 0.2 gallons per day per square foot which can be accomplished by extending the sand toe to 15.0 feet below the lower edge of the rock cell giving a total system basal area loading rate of 0.16 gallons per day per square foot. 19. The system management plan must provide adequate maintenance information to maximize the system longevity. Final authority for this site's approval rests with the appropriate regulatory authorities, the Wisconsin Department of Commerce and the St. Croix County Zoning Office. This report, conclusions and recommendations are the professional opinion of Henry F. Grote, CSTM 222774. 8 t N N44'-58' r 1 I d4 , /�,, /, _ k - _ bod Gem i - ? .. - 4 / �N44' -5 riS' } avel ( '�..�; `' `, ` ■ - r , N44'-5 -5 Hu -A ------ f N44'-5 :25' \ r %• �t ! • �I 1 • r N44' 5 " I , 1 ' i 3 -D TopoQuads Copyright ©1999 DeLorme Yarmouth, ME 04096 Source Data: USGS 400 ft Scale: 1 : 10,400 Detail: 14 -3 Datum: WGS84 ' ST. CRO!X � - u 72 N (Joins sheet 64) Ha _.. <P V a B - AoA AuA Sa �' SrA SrA VaB \ ! }� A A AoA '� q ,��. A �� � .W'Y>c �'` ` Sa8 Y� HaA '>J sac AmC2 - AoA SrA Fe � V a B , SrA �AoA > Qd AuA�� �. BPA a p,uA w > A Sa8` S C2 HaA 28 iSa( SaC2 1 (1m6 1 t . � ,�i<',�� % � G7' •°' ` . !RN ``' s., � t" 2, a i.l _µ 4 1 �' t ` ,. r , -- ,r `Q' F d A 6" , A667. { Fr SkA t• CoC2 AuA i! A � �r y A SrA NN Sr Sr x - - -- - T ♦ 'Ae 1 ' — ff Va�7 F r S, 5pC2 SrA E � A m 6 R + � a' n' A& �Zk � iti�A FoB N,.4 FOB mC2•,, ,t AmG2 �' , , v, �� +. , _:��.. ., � ..,, � .. Y� +�''`• '^$.° • t FrH` rte. AuA y �• t ,� RHC2 Ma8 t , / Ma8 5r� s tit AuA �. / i cl% SrA G + � Arp Fn6 �'� FOB i RhA C4" ENNI As8 ti d y' ?I P a t A P '3. ;.�. S C21, BP � d 4..[ ±' B #. bj• — PO \ t , F B 1t Ao6, M 1 �, `. �� Sa8 r �t Va6 SrA _' (Joins sheet 80) I z *sconsin S Opr EPORT #2351 Department of Commerce in o . A dm. Code Page 1 of 5 Division of Safety and Buildings Certified Soil Testing, LLC Attach complete site plan on paper not less than 8'/2 x 11 inches in size. Plan must County St. Croix include, but not limited to: vertical and horizontal reference point (BM), direction and percent slope, scale or dimensions, north arrow, and location and distance to nearest road. Parcel I.D. 034 - 1072 -20 -025 Please print all information. Reviewed By Date Personal information you provide may be used for secondary purposes (Privacy Law, s. 15.04 (1) (m)). Property Owner Property Location Thompson, Stan Govt. Lot NW1 /4, NE1 /4, S32, T29N, R15W Property Owner's Mailing Address Lot # Block # Subd. Name or CSMA 2867 HW 12 City State Zip Code Phone Number �, City Village X Town Nearest Road Wilson WI 1 54027 1 715 - 772 - 4867 Springfield HW 12 New Construction Use: X Residential / Number of bedrooms 3 Code derived design flow rate 450 GPD Replacement ❑ Public or commercial - Describe: Parent material loess over till Flood plain elevation, if applicable NA ft. General comments install 3.75' x 120' rock cell mound on 100.0 contour as upslope edge of rock w/ 2.5' sand fill w/ state and recommendations: county approval for interpretive determination 1 Boring # • - Boring X Pit Ground surface elev. 102.2 ft. Depth to limiting factor 0 in. Soil Application Rate Horizon Depth Dominant Color Redox Description Texture Structure Consistence Boundary Roots GPD /ft in. Munsell Qu. Sz. Cont. Color Gr. Sz. Sh. 'Eff#1 •Eff #2 1 0 -4 7.5YR 3/2 - sil 2 m gr mvfr gs im .6 8 2 4 -10 7.5YR 3/2 - sil 1 m sbk mvfr cs lm .4 .6 3 10 -14 10YR 5/4 c2d 7.5YR 4/6,5/3 sil 1 m sbk mvfr gs lm .4 .6 4 14 -20 10YR 5/4 c2d 7.5YR 4/6,5/3 sil 0 m mvfr gs lm 0 .2 5 1 20 -31 7.5YR 4/6 c3p 7.5YR 5/8 sl 0 m mfr cs lm .2 .6 10YR 6/3 6 31 -50 10YR 5/4 f1d 10YR 6/2 scl 0 m mfi - - 0 0 1 m roots to 28'; occ gr /cob /st below 10 ";H3 occasionally parts to 1 m pl; lacks A +4 "; presumptive limit is 0" 2 Boring # `-- Boring X Pit Ground surface elev. 96.4 ft. Depth to limiting factor 0 in. Soil Application Rate Horizon Depth Dominant Color Redox Description Texture Structure Consistence Boundary Roots GPD /ft in. Munsell Qu. Sz. Cont. Color Gr. Sz. Sh. 'Eff #1 �Eff #2 1 - 0 7 7.5YR 3/1 - sil 1 f -m sbk mvfr cs im I .4 .6 2 7 -11 7.5YR 3/1 f1f 7.5YR 3/4,5/3 sil 1 m sbk mvfr cs im .4 .6 3 11 -18 10YR 5/4 m2 10YR 6/3 /6 sil 1 m sbk mvfr gs im .4 .6 4 18 -46 7.5YR 4/6 c3p 7.5YR 5/8,5/3 sl 0 m mfr - lm .2 .6 1 m roots to 42 "; H 2 occasionally parts to 1 m pl; H 4 has pockets Is; lacks A +4 "; presumptive limit is 0" Effluent #1 = BOO 5> 30 < 220 mg /L and TSS >30 - 150 mg /L * Effluent #2 = BOD < 30 mg /L and TSS < 30 mg /L CST Name (Please Print) Signatur : CST Number H enry F. Grote 222774 Address Certified Soil Testing, LLC Date Evaluation Conducted Telephone Number E. 4366 353rd Ave. Menomonie, WI 54751 11/7/2005 715 - 233 -0398 SBD -8330 (R 07/00) S 1 ' Property Owner Thompson, Stan Parcel ID IV 034 - 1072 -20 -025 Page _2 of 5 3 Boring ❑ Boring # X Pit Ground surface elev. -104 ft. Depth to limiting factor 0 in. Soil Application Rat Horizon Depth Dominant Color Redox Description Texture Structure Consistence Boundary Roots GPD /ft in. Munsell Qu. Sz. Cont. Cola Gr. Sz. Sh. 'Eff#1 Eff#2 1 0 -4 7.5YR 3/2 - sil 2 m gr mvfr gs lm .6 .8 2 j 4 -12 7.5YR 3/2 fld 10YR 6/3 sil 1 m sbk mvfr cs lm 4_ .6 m2d 7.5YR 4/6 --- - - - - -- - - 3 12 - 10YR 5 / 4 lOYR 6/3 sil 1 m sbk mvfr - 4 6 I - -- - - - - - -- I lacks A +4 "; presumptive limit is 0" 4 Fl Boring Boring # Pit Ground surface elev. 103 ft. Depth to limiting factor 0 in. 1`, Soil Application Rat Horizon Depth Dominant Color Redox Description Texture Structure Consistence Boundary Roots GPD /ft in. Munsell Qu. Sz. Cont. Color Gr. Sz. Sh. 'Eff #1 •Eff#2 1 0 -8 7.5YR 3/1 - sil 1 f -m sbk mvfr cs im j .4 .6 2 8 -13 7.5YR 3/1 cld 7.5YR 3/4,5/3 sil 1 m sbk mvfr cs lm .4 .6 3 13 -18 j 10YR 5/4 m2p 7.5YR 4/6,5/3 sil 0 m mfr gs lm 0 .2 4 18 -30 10YR 4/4 c2d 7.5YR 4/6,5/3 sicl 0 m mfi - 0 0 I lacks A +4 "; presumptive limit is 0" Boring B oring Boring # !X, Pit Ground surface elev. 103.1 ft. Depth to limiting factor 0 in. Soil Application Rat Horizon Depth Dominant Color Redox Description Texture Structure Consistence Boundary Roots GPD /ft in. Munsell Qu. Sz. Cont. Cola Gr. Sz. Sh. `Eff#1 •Eff#2 1 0 - 3 7.5YR 3/1 - sil 2 m gr mvfr gs 1m'�� .6 .8 fld 10YR 6/3 � - - -- - - -- - 2 3 -10 7.5YR 3 / 1 flf 7.5YR 3/4 sil 1 m pl mvfr cs lm 4 6 -- 3 10 -16 ! 10YR 6/3 c2d 7.5YR 4/6 sil 0 m mfr gs i lm 0 .2 4 16 - 26 10YR 5/4 n2p 7.5YR 4/6 sicl 0 m mfi - 0 0 -- - — — - -- < - - - -- -- lacks A +4 "; presumptive limit is 0" Effluent #1 = BOD > 30 < 220 mg /L and TSS >30 < 150 mg /L ' Effluent #2 = BOD < 30 mg /L and TSS < 30 mg /L The Department of Commerce is an equal opportunity service provider and employer. If you need assistance to access services or need material in an alternate format, please contact the department at 608 - 266 -3151 or TTY 608 - 264 -8777. 5130 -8, 30 ( R 07/00) Certified Soil Testing, LLC t Property Owner Thompson, Stan Parcel ID 034 - 1072 -20 -025 Page 3 - of --- 5_ Boring Boring • ❑Boring # Pit Ground surface elev. 98.6 ft. Depth to limiting factor 0 in. Soil Application Rat Horizon Depth Dominant Color Redox Description Texture Structure Consistence Boundary Roots GPD /ft in. Munsell Qu. Sz. Cont. Cola Gr. Sz. Sh. *Eff#1 *Eff#2 1 0 -3 7.5YR 3/2 - sl 2 m gr mvfr gs 1f /m .6 1.0 2 3 -12 7.5YR 3/2 - sl 1 m sbk mvfr cs 1m .4 .7 3 12 -14 7.5YR 4/3 fif 7.5YR 3/4,5/3 sl 1 m pl mvfr cw lm .4 .6 4 14 -34 7.5YR 4/4 f2d 7.5YR 5/8,5/3 sl 0 m mfr cw - .2 .6 5 34 -46 7.5YR 4/3 - sl 0 m mti cw - 2 .6 6 46 -72 7.5YR 4/6 f3p 7.5YR 5/8,5/3 s 0 sg ml - .7 1.6 H 5 has considerable gr; H6 has lots of sl inclusions w/ f2p 7,5YR 5/8,5/3 redox features; lacks A +4 "; presumptive limit is 0" F i l Boring Boring # X Pit Ground surface elev. — 115 ft. Depth to limiting factor 0 in. Soil Application Rat Horizon Depth Dominant Color Redox Description Texture Structure Consistence Boundary Roots GPD /ft in. Munsell Qu. Sz. Cont. Color Gr. Sz. Sh. *Eff#1 •Eff#2 1 0 -8 7.5YR 3/2 - sil 2 m gr mvfr gs lm 6 8 2 8 -10 7.5YR 3/2 fif 7.5YR 3/4,5/3 sil 1 m sbk mvfr cs lm 4 6 c2d 7.5YR 4/6 3 10 -30 i� 7.5YR 4J4 10YR 6/3 sil 1 m sbk mfr - 4 .6 �� I I H2 & 3 often part to 1 m pl; lacks A +4 "; pit on highest ground to NE; 2 others similar somewhat lower in same area; presumptive limit is 0" 8 Boring Boring # \pit Ground surface elev. 98.6 ft. Depth to limiting factor 0 in. Soil Application Rat Horizon Depth Dominant Color Redox Description Texture Structure Consistence Boundary Roots GPDW in. Munsell Qu. Sz. Cont. Cola Gr. Sz. Sh. *Eff#1 'Eff#2 1 0 -9 10YR 3/2 - sil 1 f -m sbk mvfr cs lm ! .4 .6 2 9 -12 10YR 5/3 fIf 7.5YR 3/4 sil 1 m sbk mvfr cs lm 4 6 3 -- 12 -19 10YR 5/3 fIf 7.5YR 3/4 sil 1 m sbk mfr cw I lm 4 .6 - - - -- ���— -- - _ 4 19 -45 7.5YR 4/6 f2d 7.5YR 5/8 10YR 6/2 sl 0 m mvfr - - 2 .6 -- + -- ; i H3 parts to 1 f pl; H1 -3 slightly gritty w/ s; H4 has inclusions 7.5YR 5/6 s; lacks A +4 "; presumptive limit is 0" Effluent #1 = BOD > 30 < 220 mg /L and TSS >30 < 150 mg /L * Effluent #2 = BOD < 30 mg /L and TSS < 30 mg /L The Department of Commerce is an equal opportunity service provider and employer. If you need assistance to access services or need material in an alternate format, please contact the department at 608 -266 -3151 or TTY 608 - 264 -8777. S8n -8330 (R 07/00) Certified Soil Testing, LLC 1 Property Owner Th ompson, Stan Parcel ID # 034 - 1072 -20 -025 Page 4 of F Boring Boring # X pit Ground surface elev. 101.0 ft. Depth to limiting factor 0 in. �, Soil Application Rat Horizon Depth Dominant Color Redox Description Texture Structure Consistence Boundary Roots GPD /ft in. Munsell Qu. Sz. Cont. Color Gr. Sz. Sh. 'Eff#1 `Eff#2 1 0 -10 10YR 3/2 - sil 1 f -m sbk mvfr cs 1M 4 .6 2 10 -17 1 10YR 4/4 flf 10YR 6/3 sl 1 m sbk mvfr cs 1M .4 .7 3 - j 17 -28 _ 10YR 4/3 - Is 1 m sbk mvfr cw j lm .7 T 1_6 I 4 28 -48 10YR 4/3 f2p 7.5YR 5/8,5/3 sl 0 m mfr cs 1m .2 .6 5 ! 48 -57 7.5YR 4/6 - sl 0 m mfi cs 1m .2 .6 - - - -- - -- --- - - - - -- 6 57-67 10YR 4/6 - fs 0 sg ml - lm .5 1.0 H2 redox around small rocks; H4 has some 7.5YR 5/8 f SS gr; H6 has stratified 10YR 4/4 & 7.5YR 4/4 sl bands; lacks A +4 "; presumptive limit is 0" Effluent #1 = BOD > 30 < 220 mg /L and TSS >30 < 150 mg /L ' Effluent #2 = BOO < 30 mg /L and TSS < 30 mg /L The Department of Commerce is an equal opportunity service provider and employer. If you need assistance to access services or need material in an alternate format, please contact the department at 608 - 266 -3151 or TTY 608 - 264 -8777. siin ei;n (k 07,00) Certified Soil Testing, LLC 1 a r I ;f � S 0 v ( 1oz.i) -1 q �+ CS