HomeMy WebLinkAbout016-1032-95-050Wisconsin Department of Commerce PRIVATE SEWAGE SYSTEM County St. Croix
Safety and Building Division
INSPECTION REPORT Sanitary Permit No.
GENERAL INFORMATION (ATTACH TO PERMIT) 641942
State Plan ID No:
Personal information you provide may be used for secondary purposes [Privacy Law, s.15.04 (1)(ni
Permit Holder's Name: City Village Township Parcel Tax No
Michael &Julie Luks TOWN OF GLENWOOD 1 016-1032-95-050
CST BM Elev: Insp. BM Elev BM Description: Section/Town/Range/Map No:
15.30.15.243A-50
TANK INFORMATION ELEVATION DATA
TYPE
Holding
TANK SETBACK INFORMATION
TANK TO
P/L
WELL
BLDG.
Vent to Air Intake
ROAD
Septic
Dosing
Aeration
Holding
PUMP/SIPHON INFORMATION
Manufacturer Demand
GPM
Model Number
TDH Lift Friction Loss System Head TDH Ft
Forcemain Length Dia. Dist. to Well
SUIL AUSURPTION SYSTEM
STATION
BS
HI
FS
ELEV.
Benchmark
Alt. BM
Bldg. Sewer
St/Ht Inlet
Sl/Ht Outlet
DtInlet
Dt Bottom
Header/Man.
Dist. Pipe
Bot. System
Final Grade
St Cover
BEDITRENCH
DIMENSIONS
Width
Length
No. Of Trenches
PIT DIMENSIONS
No. Of Pits
Inside Dia.
Liquid Depth
SETBACK
INFORMATION
SYSTEM TO
I P/L
BLDG
IWELL
LAKE/STREAM
LEACHING
CHAMBER OR
UNIT
Manufacturer:
Type Of System.
Model Number:
UIJ1 r[IGV 1IVIV aTa lr-li
Header/Manifold
Distribution
x Hole Size
x Hole Spacing
Vent to Air Intake
Pipes)
Length Dia
Length Dia Spacing
JVIL VV YCR C-1- n. h. -- RA -..-A n..1 n_...d.. -1-_- -i..
Depth Over
Depth Over
xx Depth of
xx Seeded'Sodded
xx Mulched
Bed/Trench Center
Bed/Trench Edges
Topsoil
❑ Yes E No
❑Yes
COMMENTS: (Include code discrepencies, persons present, etc.) Inspection #1: Inspection #2:
Location: 1595 300TH ST
1.) Alt BM Description =
2.) Bldg sewer length =
- amount of cover =
Plan revision Required? Yes ❑ No
Use other side for additional information. L I
SBD-6710 (R.3/g7) Date Insepcor's Signature Cart. No.
5MA— 2,oa2-2-- jDj
D Industry Services Division
[EdD 4822 Madison Yards Way
Madison, WI 53705 P ' s .O. Box 7167
APR 0 i ZU22 Madison, WI 537 -716
JL
trni, t pplication
In accordance with SP n of this form to the approp ' unit
is required prior to obtaining a sanitary permit. Note Application forms for state-owned P TS are submitted to
the Department of Safety and Professional Services. Personal information you provide may be used for secondary
purposes in accordance with the Privacy Law, s. 15.04(1)(m), Stats.
L Ann1ir9Bnn infnrmatinn _ D4au Priwe All r..rn.".esa....
MICHEAL J. & JULIE LUKS
Property Owner's Mailing Address
678 N. 5TH STREET
NEW RICHMOND, WI 1 54017
II. Type of Building (check all that apply)
FV]l or 2 Family Dwelling —Number ofBpdtoeloms `
❑Ptlblic/Commercial— DescribeUse
]State Owned — Describe Use
III. Type of POWTS Permit: (Check either "New" or "Reolacen
ounty
ST. CROIX
anitary Permit Number (to be filled in by C
&Y1 %`%2-
WTS - 072101559 - C - (t11a
jeer Address (if different than mailing address)
15-95'- 300TH STREET
016 - 1032 - 95 - 050
Govt. Lot NA
Phone Number
612 - 290 - 6396 NW ,,, NW /, Section is
Lot # T 30 N R 15 E or W
1 Subdivision Name
Block # NA
NA
NX: ( 91 -f '�A-JVillage of
g Zy Town of GLENWOOD
applicable on line A. Check one box on line
Hue C
-' LPew System ' (Replacement System u0ther Modification to Existing System (explain) Additional Pretreatment Unit (explain)
B. Holding Tank ]uIn-Ground [:j4t-Grade ✓Mound Individual Site Design Other Type (explain)
(conventional)
C.
U Renewal Before
uRevision
PChange
of Plumber
❑Transfer to New Owner
t( 00,
Expiration
f /8
1
fCA
IV.
Dlspersal/Treatment Area and Tank Informatio
.--
Design Flow (gpd)
Design Soil Application Rate(gpd/st)
Dispersal Area Required (so
Dispersal Area P
s (sf)
Sys[em Elevation
450
2.0
225
292.50
?".9
87.50 F
Capacity in
Total
# of
Manufacturer
Tank Information
Gallons
Gallons
Gallons
Units
a
U u
New Tanks
Tanks
uF_T�'�, T`
r
9
y
si
r...dr1��e Z-1G r
n 'i
a U
in
rn
w 0
a
Septic or Holding Tank
1000
1000
1
WIESER
✓
Hosing Chamber
750
750
1
WIESER
✓
Q
V. xesponslelilty btatement— 1, the undersigned, assume re ns illty for Installation of the POWTS shown on the attached plans. .
Plumber's Name (Print) Plum s MP/MPRS Number Business Phone Number
CORY J. JACKSON ` Si to 824339 715-866-8944
9306 BLACK BROOK RD., WEBSTER, WI 54893
Approved O DisAjjE3><Permit Fee Datq Issued Issuing Agent Signature
/� t Y O
er Given Reason fo enial $ C/ r ✓ a170,,, `
3) - w ! un5 tacLrbS
Septic tank, effluent filter and p�
dispersal cell must be aervleAd / maintained
as per management plan provided by plumber. e r-54reA44A &v%- E>k:c .o N.f. $
All setback requirements must be maintained,
as per applicable code/ordinances.
Wa,,, t S, S D. a,.0
Attach to complete plans for the system Gy t it ty on ` t less than a 112 x I I inches to size
SBD-6398 (R. 03/21) t:�K,6�0�
�D D
7
1
jo -n1N M/✓ 3� la"1si
-I
�S viol! -4
Ww I
cda?
ah .►lye
�rvv
-A3Lj%3 t dcgMdM �
Irv�
NW
I 1uY t ix7
�NIY ►i`>w,$
yy�s CINnawol-,osL
_ ;rn�y�iie�s aL /921
39 oL 'n3r'4
-n33l G?t
�L+ O
1 oSZta1M MaN o
C,. �; he�C ws5 b h da fah �P
0
L noTvo Oii ?1�S�1M f49N a
sx
— 113g�i oe
w
,
r ¢� Ya
1 gy91yt1CS 7Mo�—�—�-- .,
J':+•�f �� fT��
j iG� As,•��� J•'�
d
c
u
L
F
e6''O RTA1
A
�r.
>� 93 S A
December 29, 2021
CONDITIONAL APPROVAL
PLAN APPROVAL EXPIRES: 2023-07-08
Plan Review: PWTS-072101559-C
MARYJO HUPPERT
28497 King Arthur's Court
Danbury Wl54830
SITE:
Michael and Julie Luks
3001h Street
St. Croix County
Town of Glenwood
NW'/.-NW%-515—T30N—R15W
FOR:
DIVISION OF INDUSTRY SERVICES
10541 N RANCH RD
HAYWARD WI 54843-6462
Contact Through Relay
httpJfdsps.wi.gov/programsfindusvyaenricea
www.vAsconsin.gov
Tony Evers - Govwnor
Dawn Grim - "cretery
G10NDMONALLY
APPROVED
DEPT OF SAFETY AND PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
DIVISION OF INDUSTRY SERVICES
SEE COIKRESPONDENCE
Description: GeoMat Mound Component Manual — Edition
3 Bedroom GeoMat Mound —450 GPD — 1, 2017
New Construction - 6" to limiting factor — Pressure Distribution Component Manual — Ver.
Effluent Filter - Maintenance required 2.0, SBD-10706-P (N.01/01, R. 10/12)
The submittal described above has been reviewed for conformance with applicable Wisconsin Administrative
Codes and Wisconsin Statutes. The submittal has been CONDITIONALLY APPROVED. This system is to be
constructed and located in accordance with the enclosed approved plans and with any component manual(s)
referenced above. The owner, as defined in chapter 101.01(10), Wisconsin Statutes, is responsible for compliance
with all code requirements.
No person may engage in or work at plumbing in the state unless licensed to do so by the Department per
s.145.06, stats.
The following conditions shall be met during construction or installation and prior to occupancy or use:
Reminders
• This approval is subject to the conditions of the Interpretive Determination approved for this site on
December 29, 2021.
• 30" of sand shall be installed between the contour and the bottom of the GeoMat product.
• Orifice shields are required on each orifice.
• Maximum volume of a single dose is Yz gallon per linear foot of GeoMat. Care must be taken to set the
dose volume as approved in the plan design. If the minimum tether length of a single switch mechanical
float does not allow the proper dose volume, two separate floats must be used.
0 Calculate accurate vertical lift and ensure properly sized pump is installed.
• Prior to construction of the dispersal area, check the moisture content of the soil to a depth of 8 inches.
Smearing and compacting of wet soil will result in reducing the infiltration capacity of the soil. Proper soil
moisture content can be determined by rolling a soil sample between the hands. If it rolls into a 1/4- inch
wire, the site is too wet to prepare. If it crumbles, site preparation can proceed. If the site is too wet to
prepare, do not proceed until it dries.
• The mound site shall be properly prepared prior to plowing. Any grasses longer than 6" shall be cut short
and removed. To avoid matting, any leaves or loose organic matter shall be raked up and removed. Cut
trees and shrubs flush to the ground and leave stumps. Avoid operating equipment on the mound site. If
necessary, use only tracked equipment, during dry conditions, with minimal passes, to avoid compaction.
• A sanitary permit must be obtained from the county where this project is located in accordance with the
requirements of Sec. 145.19, Wis. Stats.
• Inspection of the private sewage system installation is required. Arrangements for inspection shall be made
with the designated county official in accordance with the provisions of Sec. 145.20(2)(d), Wis. Stats.
• A state approved effluent filter is required. Maintenance information must be given to the owner of the tank
explaining that periodic cleaning of the filter isrequired.
• A copy of the approved plans, specifications and this letter shall be on -site during construction and open to
inspection by authorized representatives of the Department, which may include local inspectors.
Owner Responsibilities
The current owner, and each subsequent owner, shall receive a copy of this letter. Owners shall also receive a
copy of the appropriate operation and maintenance manual(s) and be responsible for ensuring that POWTS is
operated and maintained in accordance with this chapter and the approved management plan under s. SPS
383.54(1).
In the event this soil absorption system or any of its component parts malfunctions so as to create a health
hazard, the property owner must follow the contingency plan as described in the approved plans.
• The owner is responsible for submitting a maintenance verification report acceptable to the county for
maintenance tracking purposes. Reports shall be submitted at intervals appropriate for the component(s)
utilized in the POWTS.
In granting this approval the Division of Industry Services reserves the right to require changes or additions
should conditions arise making them necessary for code compliance. As per state stats 101.12(2), nothing in
this review shall relieve the designer of the responsibility for designing a safe building, structure, or
component.
Inquiries concerning this correspondence may be made to me at the telephone number listed below, or at the
address on this letterhead.
The above left addressee shall provide a copy of this letter and the POWTS management plan to the owner and
any others who are responsible for the installation, operation or maintenance of the POWTS.
Sincerely,
CeCel g '
CeCe (Elizabeth) Rudnicki
Wastewater Specialist/POWTS Plan Reviewer, Division of Industry Services
(608)400-3186
elizabeth.rudnicki@wisconsin.gov
INDEX AND TITLE PAGE
Project Name: MICHAEL J. & JULIE WKS
Owner's Name: (SAME)
Owner's Address: 678 N. 5TH STREET
NEW RICHMOND, WI 54017
Property Address: 300TH STREET
Legal Description: NW NW S 15 T 30 N R 15 W
Township Glenwood _ .� County: ST CROIX
Subdivision Name: NA
Lot Number: 1 Block Number. NA CSM#: 26-6010
Parcel I.D. Number. 016 -1032 - 95 - 050
Plan Transaction No.:
Page 1
Page 2
Page 3
Page 4
Page 5
Page 6
Page 7
Page 8
Date:
Index and title
Page 9
Data entry
Page 10
GeoMat mound drawings
Page 11
Lateral and dose tank
Page 12
Distribution media
Page 13
System maintenance specifications
Page 14
Management and contingency plan
Pump curve and specifications
O HUPPERT
Tank cross sections
Plot Dian
Soil test
Aerial
License Number 1859-007
Phone Number: 715-426-1775
Signature: , >/ y 6�r., �{ �i(,JJJp� CONDITIONALLY
Desi'iter Stamp:, APPROVED
_ r-= DEPT OF SAFETY AND PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
DIVISION OF INDUSTRY SERVICES
•. tarl e�.L
?�!••�'•• •••'`� - ;� SEE CORRESPONDENCE
'+ '••+4 ; �_ , .-+ ;•Designed Pursuant to the
Synergy'SXst insl•L:a:; ttpNlat Mound Component Manual (Edition 1, 2017). (N. 4/17),
SSWMP Publidstiifii' B!d lyesign of Pressure Distribution Networks for ST-SAS (01/31) and
Pressure Distribution Component Manual Ver. 2.0 SBD-10706-P (N. 01/01, R. 10/12)
GeoMat Mound Edition 1, 2017 Page 1 of 14
M,
R Residential or Commercial Design
300.00 Estimated Wastewater Flow (gpd)
1.50 Peaking Factor (e.g. 1.5 = 150%)
450.00 Design Flow (gpd)
13.00 Site Slope (%)
86.00 Installation Contour Line Elevation (ft)
6.00 Depth to Limiting Factor (in)
0.80 In -situ Soil Application Rate (gpolftZ)
140.001 Contour Length Available (ft)
0 ISO Required?
o a o
3.25 Cell Width (ft) 3.25, .5 or 9.75 Only 90.00 1Designer Input Cell Length (ft)
2.00 Dispersal Cell Design Loading Rate (gpolftZ) .,;116923 Dispersal Cell Length Required (ft)
2 Influent Wastewater Quality (1 or 2)
ress re"DlsfrlbutloR lnfortriat on `° �`
Center or End Manifold
Number of Laterals
Lateral Spacing (ft)
Forcemain Drainback (gal)
Forcemain Filter Loss (ft)
Forcemain Diameter (in)
Forcemain Length (ft)
Inside Pump Tank Elevation (ft)
Orifice Diameter (in) (e.g. 0.25)
Estimated Orifice Spacing (ft) _
System Head (ft) x 1.3
Vertical Lift (ft)
Friction Loss (ft)
Total Dynamic Head (ft)
5x Void Volume (gal)
Minimum Dose Volume (gal)
System Demand (gpm)
Are the laterals the highest point
in the distribution �— Y
network?
If N above, enter the elevation ft
of the highest point.
Does the forcemain drain back?l Y
Diarneter'Selecti'oti' �" " "'"' � "'
Lateral Diameter Selection
options
choice
I
x
X
x
x
6.50 ft2/orifice
Manifold
Diameter Selection
in. dia.
options
choice
1.25
1.50
2.00
3.00
Treatment Tank Information Effluent Filter Information
1000.00 Septic Tank Capacity (gal) FTUF-TITE —� Filter Manufacturer
]Wieser Concrete Products, Inc. Manufacturer LT6 Filter Model Number
Dose Tank Information Gallonslinch Calculator (optional)
750.001 Dose Tank Capacity (gal) Total Tank Capacity (gal)
20.24 Dose Tank Volume ( al/in) Total Working Liquid Depth (in)
Wieser Concrete Products, Inc. Manufacturer gal/in (enter result in cell DoseTankVolume)
Project: MICHAEL J. & JULIE LUKS
Page 2 of 14
.................................................
.............................................
1/10 B Observation
: Pipe
K r; r.f.r. :.l;r;f.:.f.: .: .:.: .:.: .:.:.:...: .:.: .: .:: +:+. +:!'
:"•'M1.... S. .S:M1...•5:..: •M1�5 �5 �\:5 �5 �5 �5 �5 �•.\:::y:i:5:.'.'.'M1:M1:.�:.�.�.5iti." ... •.
r:rY.l.f.l.:.r.l.l.: p: .. .. .. .. .. .... ^.. .. ..: :::f:f•.•.r.f.r.l•l ::f:l:f:l.
; r;IYM•rY.:YY•lY [I l•fYYY•!•: •l; l; l; l;J IYYY•f• .
. 5:5.5.5.5.5.4'.. •.. �:5::.:\:M1�:.:1i 5:\i \:5:1:\....5....... •.... .. •..•..•
.....................:".:....::.........:'i::.:::.:
B
0:
L
A 3.25 Ift E I 23.07 in
B 90.00 ft F 14.50 in
DI 18.00 in G 0.50 ft
292.50 (ft) Dispersal Cell Area
5.00 (gpd/ft) Linear Loading Rate
H 1.00 ft K 11.76 ft
1 17.86ft L 113.52ft
J 6.92 ft W 28.03 ft
1
J
A
1899.59 (ft) Basal Area Available
9.00 (ft) 1/10 B Obs. Pipe Placement
- - - - -- - - - -----
GeoMat Dispersal Area
Observation Pipe
12" ASTM C 33 sand as GeoMat
required for Geo Mat tinn ran
component b GeoMat + 12" ASTM C-33 sand
89.71 Finish Grade ------- r`r .• F %,/ Cover Material
88.58 Lateral Invert Elevation �� -n
87.50 Dispersal Cell r
,�` �• Slope 13.0
;L4
Elevation L
Contour Elevation 86.00
Tilled Area
\ � Forcemain
In situ soil
In situ soil09
(12
u 1
i Topsoil Cap
2 Subsoil Cap 30 y
3 E—Z-71 ASTM C 33 sand (F) s
4 ASTM C 33 sand (D)
5 0 Tilled Layer
6 Geo Mat
See details on page 4 for number, size, and spacing of laterals.
Project: MICHAEL J. & JULIE LUKS Page 3 of 14
Oars
on Turn -up W/ball valve or cleat
All orifices point down
" x lot orlfke located at Z
Laterals & forr
.r eoe r-r.rs ...
Number of Laterals 1 Orifice Diameter 0.125 in
Lateral Diameter 1.50 in Orifice Spacing (X) 2.00 ft
Lateral Length (P) 89.00 ft Orifices per Lateral 45
Lateral End (Z) 1.00 it Orifice Density 6.50 ftzlorifice
Lateral Spacing (S) 0.00 ft Manifold Length 0.00 ft
Lateral Flaw Rate 18.54 gpm Manifold Diameter 1.50 in
System Flow Rate 18.54 gpm Forcemain Velocity 3.37 fusee
Locking on%cr High naming lalxl.
hiking dc, i v told %wer light veal
Electrical Ms
ac Nr \1:C 300
and 51K 3I6.2g W iC
V clean ola Pipe
wim Frma owricsoorm
Sim / Tech Filter
STF 100 1/16
101 P01u __
Boss slop
and ,valer
A light gaske
i
If woicr alorn
B_
I Punlp on iluar
IPump Or 11M
Dimension
Inches
A
21.g7
B
2.00
C
308
N7540.00
D
10.00
Total
37.06
4" Vemed Co,,,
u.l !ld
_
iSC
(+ m caonn
Vvilenall tattv
rul • % emaem U tiai dnsed
optiwul aJIM forcemain cfla meter
1.5 in.
1'3iSlhUppile lo1
. \ enaee llres a woo
\ s„ Ild ground
N' Tdt ��M FWIMQ
y8�a 61in
1 Pump off elevation (ft)
Pump 80.83 �I
ntmk I / Dose tank elevation (ft)
u
~— 80.00
Wieser Concrete Products, Inc.
Ca aci
750.00
Volume
20.24
Filter Manufacturer Sim I Tech Filter
Filter Model Number STF 100 1116
Alarm Manufacturer ISJE Rhombus
Alarm Model Number AB Tank Alert
Pump Manufacturer ILibertyPumps
Pump Model Number 280 SERIES
Pump Must Deliver 16.54 gpm at 22.49 it TDH
Note: Switches containing mercury may not be used in this system.
gal/inch
Project: MICHAEL J. & JULIE LUKS Page 4 of 14
3.25 Cell Width (ft) 1.63 Sldewall to Lateral (ft)
�- Distribution Cell Cross-section Arrangements
O Distribution Pipe With Pressure Lateral �,� Orifice Shield
Turnup Enclosure — — — — — Pressure Lateral
GeoMat is covered with approved geotextile fabric as per the their product approval.
Distribution Cell Plan View Layout - Typical
3.25 Cell Width -A (ft) 90.00 Cell Length - B (ft)
End Connection Lateral Layout Diagram
Sand Fill Recommended
Pipe Dia.
ak
Water Tight
Toilet Flange 4" Min \�
ebar
� Ines I r
t" Min �� Install at cl
nd/Geo �yl l Min
Gem
Distribution Lateral
Orifice Shield
proved Infiltrative Fabric
GeoMat
Component
itive Surface/Plow Layer
r�lma Fads
1 Q
Topsoil Cap
2
Subsoil Cap
3
ASTM C 33 sand (F)
4 0
ASTM C 33 sand (D)
5
Tilled Layer
6 m
Geo Mat
See details on page 4 for number, size, and spacing of laterals.
Project: MICHAEL J. & JULIE LUKS Page 5 of 14
Service Provider's Name ICURTIS SEPTIC Phone 715-866-8958
POWTS Regulator's Name ISt Croix County SPIA -Zoning Office Phone (715 386 4680
System Flow and Load Parameters
Design Flow, - Peak 450 gpd Maximum Influent Particle Size 1/8 in
Estimated Flow - Average 300 gpd Maximum BODS 30 mg/L
Septic Tank Capacity 1000 gal Maximum TSS 30 mg/L
Soil Absorption Component Size 292.5 ft2 Maximum FOG 10 mg/L
Type of Wastewater Domestic Maximum Fecal Coliform 10E4 cfu/100 mL
Septic and Pump Tank
Effluent Filter
Pump and Controls
Alarm
Pressure System
Mound
Other
Service Frequency
Inspect and/or service once every 3 years
Inspect and clean as necessary at least once every 3 years
Test once every 3 years
Should test periodical)
Laterals should be flushed and pressure tested every 3 years
Inspect for ponding and seepage once every 3 years
Miscellaneous Construction and Materials Standards
1. Observation pipes are slotted and materials conform to Table SPS 384.30-1, have a watertight cap and are secured in as
shown in the Synergy Systems GeoMat Mound Component Manual Version 1, 2017.
2. Dispersal cell media conforms to GeoMat products approved for use with the Synergy Systems GeoMat Mound
Component Manual Version 1, 2017. Media is covered with an approved geotextile fabric.
3. All gravity and pressure piping materials conform to the requirements in SIPS 384, Wis. Adm. Code.
4. Tillage of the basal area is accomplished with a mold board or chisel plow.
5. The mound structure and other disturbed areas will be seeded and mulched to prevent soil erosion and help reduce frost
penetration.
Lateral Turn -up Detail
Threaded Cleanout
Plug or Ball Valve
&"A Long Sweep 90 or Two
*____.,45 Degree Bends Same
Diameter as Lateral
2.5 Feet
Project: MICHAEL J. & JULIE LUKS Page 6 of 114
Mound System Management Plan
Pursuant to SPS 383.54, Wis. Adm. Code
General
This system shall be operated in accordance with SPS 382-84 Wis. Adm. Code, and shall maintained in accordance with its' component
manuals [Synergy Systems L.L.C., Geomat Mound Component Manual version 1, 2017, Pressure Distribution Component Manual Ver. 2.0
SBD-10706-P (N. 01101) and SSWMP Publication 9.6 (01/81)] and local or state rules pertaining to system maintenance and maintenance
reporting.
Septic and pump tank abandonment shall be in accordance with SPS 383.33, Wis. Adm. Code when the tanks are no longer
used as POWTS components.
Septic or pump tank manhole risers, access risers and covers should be inspected for water tightness and soundness. Access openings
used for service and assessment shall be sealed watertight upon the completion of service. Any opening deemed unsound, defective, or
subject to failure must be replaced. Exposed access openings greater than 8-inches in diameter shall be secured by an effective locking
device to prevent accidental or unauthorized entry into a tank or component.
Septic Tank
The septic tank shall be maintained by an individual certified to service septic tanks under s. 281.48, Stats. The contents of the septic
tank shall be disposed of in accordance with NR 113, Wis. Adm. Code. The operating condition of the septic tank and outlet filter shall be
assessed at least once every 3 years by inspection.
The outlet filter shall be cleaned as necessary to ensure proper operation. The filter cartridge should not be removed unless provisions
are made to retain solids in the tank that may slough off the filter when removed from its enclosure. If the filter is equipped with an alarm,
the filter shall be serviced if the alarm is activated continuously. Intermittent filter alarms may indicate surge Flows or an impending
continuous alarm.
The septic tank shall have its contents removed when the volume of sludge and scum in the tank exceeds 113 the liquid volume of the
tank. If the contents of the tank are not removed at the time of a triennial assessment, maintenance personnel shall advise the owner as to
when the next service needs to be performed to maintain less than maximum scum and sludge accumulation in the tank.
The addition of biological or chemical additives to enhance septic tank performance Is generally not required. However, if such
products are used they shall be approved for septic tank use by the Wisconsin Department of Commerce.
Pump Tank
The dosing (pump) tank shall be inspected at least once every 3 years. All switches, alarms, and pumps shall be tested to verify proper
operation. If an effluent filter is installed within the tank it shall be inspected and serviced as necessary. If the force main has a weep hole,
it should be noted if it is functional during pump operation, and if not, it should be cleaned.
'No one should ever enter aseptic or dose tank since dangerous gases maybe present that could cause death.""
Mound and Pressure Distribution System
No trees or shrubs should be planted on the mound. Plantings may be made around the mound's perimeter, and the mound shall be
seeded and mulched as necessary to prevent erosion and to provide some protection from frost penetration. Traffic (other than for
vegetative maintenance) on the mound is not recommended since soil compaction may hinder aeration of the infiltrative surface within the
mound and snow compaction in the winter will promote frost penetration. Cold weather installations (October -February) dictate that the
mound be heavily mulched as protection from freezing.
Influent quality into the mound system may not exceed 220 mg/L BCD., 150 mg/L TSS, and 30 mg/L FOG for septic tank effluent or 30
mg/L BODS, 30 mg/L TSS, 10 mg/L FOG, and 104 cfu/100 mL for highly treated effluent. Influent flow may not exceed maximum design flow
specified in the permit for this installation.
The pressure distribution system is provided with a flushing point at the end of each lateral, and it is recommended that each lateral be
flushed of accumulated solids at least once every 3 years. When a pressure test is performed it should be compared to the initial test when
the system was installed to determine if orifice clogging has occurred and if orifice cleaning is required to maintain equal distribution within
the dispersal cell.
Observation pipes within the dispersal cell shall be checked for effluent ponding. Ponding levels shall be reported to the owner, and any
levels above 4 inches considered as an impending hydraulic failure requiring additional, more frequent monitoring.
Contingency Plan
If the septic tank or any of its components become defective the tank or component shall be repaired or replaced to keep the system in
proper operating condition.
If the dosing tank, pump, pump controls, alarm or related wiring becomes defective the defective component(s) shall be immediately
repaired or replaced with a component of the same or equal performance.
If the mound component fails to accept wastewater or begins to discharge wastewater to the ground surface, it will be repaired or
replaced in its' present location by increasing basal area if toe leakage occurs or by removing biologically clogged absorption and dispersal
media, and related piping, and replacing said components as deemed necessary to bring the system into proper operating condition.
See Page 6 of this plan for the name and telephone number of your local POWTS regulator and service provider.
Project: MICHAEL J. & JULIE LUKS Page 7 of 14
LITERS PER IINiTE
50 100 150 200
10 �0 30 40 50 60
1
GALLONS PER ►RODE
CCW,z 2014 Lbmy Pmmp hx M1 op mmffv%a
9.5'
[2d0mm]
6.S'
[1 "!nm]
CORDS 23OV. OR 120V
[33
PIGGY BACK - AUTOMATIC SHOWN
M]
c..c •c
plcp r�C r 280SERIES DIMENSIONAL
PM\gOTC5CILMG/Pr• r
wHR�GYYI..MY[KR •M1 A
Yam. ... c.: o. m rrn v..r u.x•p -.....
28O P2 R0 "14 tCWydpi 2014 Lleq F=F be AWWW"e\wl �edEe6omwdjen fo rl� moiler calks.
1204"
:atV Ln
rt .D r U
M �
SIDE VIEW
WLP1250-M R
TANK SPECIFICATIONS
DIMENSIONS:
WALL: 2 1/2"
BOTTOM: SEPTIC 3"
COVER: 5"
MANHOLE: 24" I.D. PRECAST CONCRETE RISER
HEIGHT: 52 1/2" O.D.
LENGTH: 120 1/4" O.D.
WIDTH: 84" O.D.
BELOW INLET: 41" O.D.
4" CAST -A -SEAL LIQUID LEVEL: 38"
WEIGHT: 8,810 LBS.
INLET AND OUTLET:
4" CAST -A -SEAL B00T OR EQUAL
GASKET, CAST -A -SEAL BOOT OR EQUAL
INLET AND OUTLET BAFFLE AND FILTER:
WISCONSIN, SEE DETAIL #10
(OTHER STATES SEE CHART)
LIQUID CAPACITY: 34.81 GAL/IN
HOLDING TANK:
OUTLET HOLE PLUGGED
ACTUAL CAPACITY: 1,323 GALLONS
LOADING DESIGN: 8' 0" UNSATURATED SOIL
3 OUTLET
a
M
TANKS ARE MANUFACTURED TO MEET OR EXCEED ASTM C-1227 REQUIREMENTS
TANK CAN BE USED AS:
SEPTIC/ HOLDING/ PUMP OR SIPHON
COVER: MIX DESIGN }8 NO FIBER)
TANK: MIX DESIGN 010 STRUCTURAL FIBER)
CUSTOMIZED TANKS:
FOR CUSTOM TANKS CONTACT WIESER CONCRETE
DRAWINGS SUBMITTED
FOR APPROVAL
APPROVED BY:
APPROVAL DATE:
PRODUCTS NEEDED BY:
k
0
1 /OF/
.00
4" CAST -A -SEAL
T(P /
� J —
\ FILTER BBAFM -/
TOPS
4" CAST -A -SEAL
,AullVArn:RM TO MEET OR EXCEED AST11 C-1227 REQUIREMENTS
DIMENSIONS:
WALL: 2 1 /2"
BOTTOM: 3"
COVER: 4"
MANHOLE: 24" I.D. PRECA ;ONCRETE RISER
HEIGHT: FLAT COVER 53 1/4 O.D.
OUTSIDE DIAMETER: Be O.D.
BELOW INLET: 42" 0.0.
LIQUID LEVEL: 370
WEIGHT; 6,15D L13S
INLET AND OUTLET:
4" CAST -A -SEAL BOOT OR EQUAL
GASKET, CAST -A -SEAL BOOT OR EQUAL
INLET AND OUTLET BAFFLE AND FILTER:
WISCONSIN, SEE DETAIL #10
(OTHER STATES SEE CHART)
LIQUID CAPACITY: 20.28 GAL/IN
HOLDING TANK:
OUTTLLE�T HOLE APAOPLUGG790 IDD GALLONS
LOADING DESIGN: S' 0' UNSATURATED SOIL
TANK CAN BE USED AS:
SEPTIC/ HOLDING/ PUMP OR SIPHON
COVER: MIX DESIGN 05 NO FIBER))
TANK: MIX DESIGN #10 (STRUCTURAL FIBER)
CUSTOMIZED TANKS:
FOR CUSTOM TANKS CONTACTIMESER CONCRETE
DRAWINGS SUBMITTEDII
FOR APPROVAL
APPROVED BY:
APPRIVAL " -
iW 11
imp
Y�
now
_o
0
°t1 F
TAnno nn" --
A
I „ Ep .' ' J �• �r
d� a a- y ,F) ♦ %1
L�'TKe�E S no
. - w
�R �ySfVnE !
tj
57,'
ya—
I
!may
^,CT�}
i
I i a
rle 4lELL 0-t
! ✓ WELL -To 5E= !
G
i L51 -ry SEPTIC?AA1K
l 7 50 -TO MOU &M sv"Lm
•Sf r
i
,o
^G,�Z
lolN.:r v�t.r a:alr
r J r r, u. r r- 1•
,
f1C[
• _ P�t1N
` ElBR 1'30 GALLON--�nUK wl P
\NErJ �
�� pf y' A STM 30dN
NEW Wtt-`61' 1250 7ANA
1 .1
�30 Cf q"AISTAS 3034 56*•41
JI -1
CN;vPase'(� I
+ 5; P
f1wSE �
M�
A
1"=tip"
fr'lf.IT �cq� r /iD7ED .
M1!1.& 4 Svc•[ 1 /IL.
yu, Lnr ► - c sm
i'W I;- NW-tJW-IS
ytAaWJIA TowN'"p
47- •.Poi Ir ^Osv "+ y
i
File #:
ST. CRO LINTY SANITARY SYSTEM File#: Use Only
� �0 OWNERSHIP/ADDRESS FORM
Created 2/2021
Community Development Department will utilize this information to provide the property owner with
information regarding operation and maintenance of your new or replacement sanitary system! This
information will be provided as part of our ongoing efforts to protect public health, your well, groundwater,
surface water, property values, and county resources. Once approved, this completed form and educational
information will be sent to you by email. If you would like to view your issued sanitary permit online, you can
do so by using the Property Files Scanned weblink.
OWNER/BUYERINFORMATION
Owner/Buyer Michael and Julie Luks
Mailing Address 678 N 5th St
City/State/zip New Richmond, Wi
Phone Number (required) 612-290-6396
Email Address (required) lulieluks16@gmail.com
Parcel Identification Number O 1(v_ 10 2 -- QS— D
(found on the property tax bill)
NEW SYSTEM: LEGAL DESCRIPTION
Property Location nw /, , nw t/, , Sec. 15 T 30 N R 15 W, Town of Glenwood
Subdivision Plat:
Certified Survey Map # 1147936
Warranty Deed # 1074853
Number of bedrooms 3
Lot # 1
Volume 31 Page # 7073
(before 2006)Volume , Page #
Spec house O yes E no Lot lines identifiable o yes O no
,QEFKECUSE ONLY
New Property Address�Cv�
(Verification of new address required from Communi Devel pment Department for new construction.)
(Staff Initials) (Da e)
This form must be submitted with all Private Onsite Water Treatment System (POWTS) applications.
New System: Include with this form a recorded warranty deed from the Register of Deeds Office and a copy of the certified
survey map if reference is made in the warranty deed.
Community Development Department - Land Use Division
715-386-4680 St. Croix County Government Center 715-245-4250 Fax
cdd@sccwi.gov 1101 Carmichael Road, Hudson, WI 54016 www.sccwi.gov
Parcel #: 016-1032-95-050
04/07/2022 04:16 PM
PAGE 1 OF 1
Alt. Parcel M 15.30.15.243A-50
016 - TOWN OF GLENWOOD
Current --
ST. CROIX COUNTY, WISCONSIN
Creation Date Historical Date Map # Sales Area Application # Permit # Permit Type # of Units
05/13/2014 02/02/2022 00
0
Tax Address:
Owner(s): O = Current Owner, C = Current Co -Owner
MICHEAL J LUKS
O - LUKS, MICHEAL J
678 N 5TH ST
NEW RICHMOND WI 54017
Property Address(es): ' = Primary
' 1595 300TH ST
Districts: SC = School SP = Special
Type Dist # Description
SC 2198 SCH DIST GLENWOOD CITY
SP 1700 NORTHWOOD TECH
Notes:
2022 FOR 2023 KEEPING 016-1032-95-050 AS
LOT 1 CSM 31-7073 CSM CLARIFIED PREVIOUS
OUTLOT TO LOT: "*NEW FOR 2015. RETIRED
016-1032-90-005(242(242A) & RETIRED
Legal Description: Acres:
9.810
SEC 15 T30N R15W PT NW NW CSM 26-6010 OL
Parcel History:
1
Date Doc # Vol/Page Type
11 /28/2018 1074853 QCD
05/13/2014 995933 26/6010 CSM
Plat: ' = Primary
Tract: (S-T-R40%160%GL) Block/Condo Bldg:
" 6010-CSM 26-6010 016-14
15-30N-15W NW NW OUTLOT 01
2022 SUMMARY Bill M
Fair Market Value: Assessed with:
0
Valuations:
Last Changed: 04/20/2021
Description Class Acres
Land Improve Total State Reason
PRODUCTIVE FORST LANDS G6 9.810
24,500 0 24,500 NO
Totals for 2022:
General Property 9.810
24,500 0 24,500
Woodland 0.000
0 0
Totals for 2021:
General Property 9.810 24,500 0 24,500
Woodland 0.000 0 0
Lottery Credit: Claim Count: 0 Certification Date: Batch M
Specials:
User Special Code
Category
Amount
Special Assessments Special Charges Delinquent Charges
Total 0.00 0.00 0.00
Overhead
Door #1
14' x 14'
t 4',
\` ye Garage �.
11.7 P 5 -.
Ove head
Door#2
10'x10'
Overhead
Door#3
Floor plan: 1116, = 1'
Kitchen
8
9
Family
Covered Porch
Bedroom 2
O
Bedroom
Master Bedroom
0
QR1
we
(.q, x 321 = 2,0Y06
Luk's floor plan
3/11/22
Gene Sorey
J&A Northwest Construction
Job: Mike Wks 3
Date: 3/11/2022
Time: 9:01 AM
Post Layout
....................................................
-
--
-.-..-.-.--.-.------
.....
.......f
-4 ....
............ .........
Vh .5%
V..
Job: Mike Luks 3
Date:3/11/2022
Time: 9:01AM wall Layout
a
a
136'
�f_,ry
\.i
�r«WMf
t
���� t %�1
�._ �_.,�
t
MMNMMiWIIMlf1 L�'}
fr k„F-l.
Job: Mike Luks 3
Date;3/11/2022
Time:10:06 AM
Back Elevation
4/12 4/12
4/12�4/12
4/:�
1
-1
Y • cresw�a.l.ri.l ' ' I I
Y I Mldownw I C�1wIbAOYri.Yp
.I cwy..wwr�rri.icY i , ! Ij r..wrO�Oi
I
Job: Mike Luks 3 I
Date: 3/11/2022
Time:10:06AM Right Elevation
41V
� .. fYYp111Y4iJi.w!iYYYI� CnMnWNax )4aMY Ywbw;n�ST I ._ •-�
(Y1Yq Ntl��lY�Yl Y11 CY'.Iwn W �nJm. O' W;l'11
ti I I
� I
Job: Mike Luks3
Date:3/11/2022
Time:10:06 AM
Front Elevation
4/12 `�1
4/12
n � '
� I 1
I � n
h
k"WalOITp0Y11D
� � I
', wrmw.�eeo'xrx4e� � �
i
1
I
Job: Mike Luks3 I
Date: 3/11/2022
Time:10:06AM Left Elevation
i i. i•m Wn�wl��iM CYYpajrl/a�f�aT
' Yfi►Il WONO
RECEIVED
pppART!{�,T
APR 0 7 2022
$T. CRW COUNTY CDD
't3c1U"1A��
December 29, 2021
CONDITIONAL APPROVAL
DIVISION OF *9XXnRY SERVICES
10541 N RANCH RD
WAYWARD WI $4643440
Canl.at Thmugh RWy
hopJAft&WL
WWW..b=*in.yov
SOILS SATURATION DETERMINATION
Plan Review Number: PWTS-122203184-C
MARYJO HUPPERT
28497 King Arthur's Court
Danbury WI 54830
SITE:
Michael and Julie Luks
300`h Street
St. Croix County
Town of Glenwood
NW %-NW'/<-S15—T30N—R15W
Tony Ewa - Oovornor
Doves Crim - tw•try
COND177ONALLY
APPROVED
DEFT OF SAFETY AND PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
DIVISION OF INDUSTRY SERVICES
SEE CORRESPONDENCE
The submittal described above has been reviewed for conformance with applicable Wisconsin
Administrative Codes and Wisconsin Statutes. The submittal has been CONDITIONALLY APPROVED. This
system is to be constructed and located in accordance with the enclosed approved plans and with any
component manual(s) referenced above. The owner, as defined in chapter 101.01(10), Wisconsin Statutes,
is responsible for compliance with all code requirements.
No person may engage in or work at plumbing in the state unless licensed to do so by the Department per
s.145.06, stats.
The following conditions shall be met during construction or installation and prior to occupancy or use:
• Approval is hereby granted pursuant to s. SPS 385.60(2), Wis .Adm. Code, to estimate the depth
of seasonal soil saturation based on an interpretive determination process completed by Mary Jo
Huppert, Certified Soil Tester (CST) and her recommendations.
• This approval is limited to the soil characteristics within the tested area. This approval is based
upon best management practices and does not warranty the functioning of the system. Water
conservation, wastewater disposal practice and system maintenance will aid in the longevity of
the system.
• On -site visit was conducted by CeCe Rudnicki, DSPS on November 17, 2021.
• The estimated highest level of prolonged soil saturation approved under this determination is 6
inches below grade. At least 30 inches of sand lift on top of 6 inches of unsaturated, in -situ soil is
required for adequate treatment and dispersal.
• The basal soil application rate for the mound shall be 0.8 gpd/sf, and the linear loading rate 5.0
gpd/ft.
• Prior to construction of the dispersal area, check the moisture content of the soil to a depth of 8
inches. Smearing and compacting of wet soil will result in reducing the infiltration capacity of the
soil. Proper soil moisture content can be determined by rolling a soil sample between the hands. If
it rolls into a 1/4- inch wire, the site is too wet to prepare. If it crumbles, site preparation can
proceed. If the site is too wet to prepare, do not proceed until it dries.
• Chisel plowing to a depth of 12 inches immediately prior to sand placement is required to
improve vertical water movement into the soil solum.
• Landscaping up slope of the mound shall be incorporated into the POWTS design to prevent
surface water from concentrating along the up slope edge of the mound and to divert surface
water drainage away from the system.
• This approval shall remain valid unless the site is altered in such a way that the depth to soil
saturation would change or if saturated conditions are observed for seven consecutive days at
depths less than 3 feet below the infiltrative surface of the POWTS distribution component.
• This approval in no way relinquishes the use of color patterns to estimate the depth to high
groundwater on any other parcels or portions of parcels.
• A copy of this approval letter and attachments must accompany the mound system design for this
site for purposes of plan approval and sanitary permit issuance.
A copy of the approved plans, specifications and this letter shall be on -site during construction and open
to inspection by authorized representatives of the Department, which may include local inspectors. All
permits required by the state or the local municipality shall be obtained prior to commencement of
construction/installation/operation.
In granting this approval the Division of Industry Services reserves the right to require changes or
additions should conditions arise making them necessary for code compliance. As per state stats
101.12(2), nothing in this review shall relieve the designer of the responsibility for designing a safe
building, structure, or component.
Inquiries concerning this correspondence may be made to me at the telephone number listed below, or at
the address on this letterhead.
The above addressee shall provide a copy of this letter and the POWTS management plan to the owner
and any others who are responsible for the installation, operation or maintenance of the POWTS.
Sincerely,
CeC& /i
CeCe (Elizabeth) Rudnicki
Wastewater Specialist/POWTS Plan Reviewer, Division of Industry Services
(608)400-3186
elizabeth.rudnicki@wisconsin.eov
PROPERTY MICHEAL J. &MELUKS
OWNER: 678 N. 5TH STREET
NEWRICHMOND.VA 54028
NW : of the NW%., SectionlS, T30N, R16W
ate Location: Town of GLENWOOD
ST. CROM COUNTY
CONDITIONALLY
APPROVED
DEPT OF SAFETY AND PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
Stnx Lure To Be Served: 3 bedroom dwe" DMSION OF INDUSTRY SERVICES
k),Li�,�.
SEE CORkESPONDENCE
Prepared by: 20
s
MOTlo i-iuppert, ST #224832
O--sianpr i i65?-00'I
Date: Imo- r(a) zzI
HOLLISTER'S SOIL TESTING & DESIGN
28497 King Arthur's Court
Danbury, W 54830
715 - 426 -1775
INTRODUCTION
In November 2021 this soil tester was contacted by the owner to
conduct an on -site as a previous soil tester notified them that
the soils did not have A+4 conditions that is required per the State of
Wisconsin, Department of Safety and Professional Services
regulations. I also verified the same conditions. This report is
required to determine the suitability and the installation of a private
on -site wastewater treatment system (POWTS) in lieu of groundwater
monitoring.
This property has been left wooded probably due to wet soil
conditions in the spring and steeper slopes with a small dry run
making cropping it a little more difficult. I reviewed two pits and
determined that an Interpretive Determination Report (I DR) would be
required for an approval of the POWTS.
The property is located one and a half miles northwest of Glenwood
City near S.T.H.128 in the town of Glenwood, St. Croix County.
II. PREPARATION OF REPORT
This report is being prepared according to the standards set forth by DSPS
385.60(2) of the Wisconsin Administrative Code and a guideline prepared
by Leroy Jansky called "Preparing the Interpretive Determination Report."
Ill. REQUIRED INFORMATION
A. The Soil Evaluation Report has been conducted according to DSPS
385.40 and is attached as part of this report.
PAGE 2 — LUKS — TOWN OF GLENWOOD
B. Local Hydrology
1. Surface water: no ponding appears to take place on the site
based on the vegetation. Below is a map from St. Croix
County website showing floodzone. It shows this area is not in
a wetland or a wet meadow thou some is located to the south.
The site has a 13 percent slope to the south. Also attached is
the WI DNR Surface Water Data.
i
6 9
ZONE X -.
it 16 15 14
N
o goo taco tm
dtuaranrnw�rr�+.�+1.�.��r
PAGE 3 — LUKS/TOWN OF GLENWOOD
2. Subsurface water: some rainfall leaves the site and some is
absorbed into the A horizon. The silt loam texture within the A
horizon has good structure with root and worm action taking
place. The subsoil has a weaker structure with more clay content
which tends to hold more water due to the evidence of
redoximorphic features which varies from 7 to 40 inches.
3. Soil Saturation: soil appears to become saturated due to the
heavy sandy loam and underlying till. No water was observed.
There was no observation of any wetland type vegetation.
4. Surface Water Elevations: this area is lies between Lake St. Croix
and Red Cedar River Basin in the Hay Creek River Basin. There are
no surface waters near the proposed site but a dry run. See the
attached "Surface Water Data Viewer Map" from the WI DNR
website. The St. Croix River location is approximately 17 miles to
the west and Sand Creek is to the east and flows southemly. See
map from WI DNR website.
PAGE 4 — LUKS/TOWN OF GLENWOOD
I �f
I ti• �' i ,, +►� war
r�
® s
11 ClR7
T2 U4,
.r,I
fT�1 l� .t -•.T r �.:.; �QI:rm2 r03i l.'i 38fICy :)1 ju'.4.
13
PAGE 6 — LUKS/TOWN OF GLENWOOD
E. Soil Series and Mapping Units: The United States Department of
Agriculture (USDA) has the area mapped as an Amery —Cromwell Series
with underlying sandy loam till. The soil tester encountered the soils
similar except finding redoximorphic features in the subsoil.
The series is described as moderately drained and permeability is
moderate.
aMc2
SOIL MAP
606 3S
M02
5N2
J
i. cJ
File
16
M,w^1
NDG2
0 100 200 2000
DISCWIE0. T4 �pY
atom. Donal ewS r IM
tSf44g1a O'tinNN rry ra+.
,M.
M,102
�V
PAGE7- LUKS/TOWNorGLCRWOOL)
F. Field Observations: the proposed site is in a wooded area
and has been wooded for many years with cropland all
around. There is a nice slope from the site that will drain to
the south.
The landscape and all soil pits had moist conditions. There has
been no cutting or filling in the area and no drain tile or drainage
ditches were observed.
G. Comparative Analysis: all soil borings had high and low redoximorphic
conditions under the A horizon that were few, fine, faint and then
progressed to common, medium, distinctive which indicates that it
will become more moist above the weakly cemented sandy
loam.
Therefore, I believe that no prolonged saturation occurs in the top 7
inches for more than 7 consecutive days.
H. Government Reports and Comments: there has been
IDRs approved on property located approximately 3 and 4 miles
north and south of this siste. There are a few new POWTS within
the area.
1. Conclusion and Recommendations: The site is suitable for a POWTS as
evidenced by the redoximorphic conditions described above and on the
soil report. There appears to be no evidence of hydric soils or wetland
vegetation.
PAGE 8— LUKS/TOWN OF GLENWOOD
Most of the water is absorbed into the site and moves southemly
to the dryrun and then moves westemly. There is a nice slope to
the site and no surface ponding anywhere. No prolonged saturation
occurs within the top %inches as evidenced by lack of the
redoximorphic features in the A horizon.
1. The sand fill shall be 2.50 feet of ASTM C-33 code required
material.
2. The system loading rate to be 0.6 GPD/ft2. The linear loading rate
is S. C gpd/ft.
3. Plow depth to be at least 12 inches during dry conditions so there
is no chance of soil smearing and allows for better infiltration at a
downward movement.
4. Construct the toe area of the system at a 1:4 ratio instead of the
required 1:3 to increase absorption area.
5. Recommended system contour elevation is 86.00 feet and system
elevation 81.50 feet.
The State of Wisconsin, Department of Safety and Professional Services
Wastewater Specialist will review the site and report to make a final
approval.
Submitted by,
Mary Jo Huppert
Certified Soil Tester #224832/Designer #1859-007
REFERENCES:
1.) Martin, L. (1965). The Physical Geoloov of Wisconsin.
University of Wisconsin press. Madison, Wisconsin.
2.) Soil Survey of St. Croix County. (1978) United States
Department of Agriculture. Soil Conservation Service. with the Research
Division of the College of Agriculture and Life Sciences. University of
Wisconsin.
4.) State of Wisconsin. Department of Safety and Professional
Services Code, Chapters 383 and 385.
5 ; St. Croix County. Downloaded from
httO://co.st.croix.wi.us. com
6,) Soils Series. Downloaded from
htto://usda.aov.com
7.) WI DNR web page. http://widnr.com
10 SOIL suRvaY
TABLE I. Approximate acreage and proportionate extent of the soils —Continued
Son
Acres
Percent
Soil
Acres
Percent
Ritchey milt loam, 12 to 20 percent elopes,
eroded -------- —__— -------- — ---- __
Ritchey soils and Rock outcrop, 20 to 85
percent slopes _— -------- — --- -------
Rockton milt loam, 2 to 6 percent el -___
Rockton silt loam, 6 to 12 percent slopes,
eroded -----------____---------
Rockton silt loam. 12 to 20 percent slopes.
eroded
Santiago silt loam, 2 to 6 percent slopes ____
Santiago silt loam, 6 to 12 percent slopes,
eroded �__—�---------------
1.460
6,650
990
600
560
84JW
13,300
.3
1A
.2
1
1
7.5
2.8
Sattre loam, 2 to 6 percent slopes —__—r
Sattre loam, 6 to 12 percent slopes, eroded-_
Sattre silt loam, 0 to 2 percent slopes
Sattre silt loam, 2 to 6 percent slopes _—___
Seel 'I] muck __—_____—_____—_�
Ei ry silt loam, 0 to 8 percent slopes ��
Uadiiduvents---_--------
Vlasaty allt loam, 2 to 6 percent slopes --
Vlasaty silt loam, 6 to 12 percent slopes,
eroded __�—_—_�_—_��_
7,360
3,150
7.000
16,800
2.600
16,200
1.100
18,500
3,?b0
2,960
1.6
.7
1.5
3.6
.0
8.4
2
4.0
.7
.6
Whalen milt loam, 2 to 6 percent sk _—__
Whalan silt losm. 6 to 12 percent slopes,
Santiago-Antigo eemplex, 6 to 12 percent
slopes, eroded —_---____—_—_— __
Santiago-Antigo complex, 12 to 25 percent
elopes, eroded _—______--�—_ ___—
Saprists and Aquenb—_____--__--_—
Sattre loam. 0 to 2 percent
4.950
1,260
1.960
2.060
1.0
.3
.4
.4
eroded
Whalen silt loam, 12 to 26 percent alopas,
eroded--_—__--____—____���
Water--_—__--____�_—
Total
8,100
1.300
5.730
469,760
.7
1
1.2
100.0
' Less than 0.06 percent.
friable; about 10 percent coarse frag-
ments by volume; slightly acid; clear
wavy boundary.
IIC—,88 to 60 inches; yellowish red (SYR 4/8)
heavy sandy loam; many large faint
strong brown (7.5YR 6/8) and promi-
nent grayish brown (10YR 6/2) mottles;
massive; friable; common pebbles. 10
Percent cobblestones and boulers by vol-
ume; neutral.
The solum ranges from 80 to 50 inches in thickness.
Depth to sandy loam till ranges from 18 to 34 inches.
The A horizon is black, very dark brown, or very dark
gray and 10 to 20 inches thick.
The C horizon is sandy loam or gravelly sandy loam.
The lower part of the B horizon and the C horizon are
5 to 15 percent coarse fragments.
These Adolph soils have slightly more clay in the B
horizon and upper part of the C horizon than the de-
fined range of the series, but this difference does not
alter their usefulness or behavior.
Adolph soils are near Freeon, Magnor, and Santiago
soils. All these soils have a silt loam mantle underlain
by sandy loam till. Adolph soils are more poorly drained
than Freeon, Magnor, and Santiago soils
AdA Adolph silt loam, 0 to 3 percent slopes. This
soil is in drainageways and depressions. Most areas are
elongated and range from 4 to 40 acres in size.
Included with this soil in mapping are a few small
areas of Fluvaquents, wet, and Saprists and Aquents.
Also included are some shall areas of soils where lay-
ers of heavy loam till or sandy outwash are in the
substratum.
This soil has a perched water table at or near the
soil surface throughout most the year. Runoff is very
slow. This soil is ponded or flooded during wet seasons.
Shallow surface ditches, water diversions, and tile
drains help drain areas where a good natural outlet
exists. Frosts are common on this soil late in spring
and early in fall.
This soil is suited to wetland pasture and wildlife
habitat. If adequately drained, a few areas are suited
to row crops. Capability unit 1Vw-3 ; woodland group
5w1.
The-7EIVIVY series consists of gently sloping to steep,
well drained soils on ground moraines, end moraines,
and areas of pitted drift. These are loamy soils under-
lain by sandy loam till. Native vegetation was mainly
white pine, red oak, white birch, and aspen.
In a representative profile the surface layer is dark
brown loam about 9 inches thick. The subsurface layer
is about 3 inches of brown loam. The subsoil is brown
and reddish brown, friable sandy loam about 19 inches
thick. The substratum, to a depth of 60 inches, is yel-
lowish red, friable sandy loam.
Available water capacity and permeability are mod-
erate. Natural fertility ranges from medium to low.
The organic matter content of the surface layer is
moderate.
Most areas of these soils are moderately steep or
steep. The steeper soils are in hayland, pasture, or
woodland. The gently sloping and sloping soils are used
for corn, oats, and alfalfa.
Representative profile of Amery loam, 6 to 12 per-
cent slopes, eroded, in a cultivated area, 30 yards east
and 770 yards north of southwest corner of sec. 21,
T. 80 N., R. 15 W. -
Ap-0 to 9 inches; dark brown (10YR 3/8) loam,
high sand content; moderate medium sub -
angular blocky structure parting to mod-
erate fine and medium granular; friable;
many roots; neutral; abrupt smooth
bou
in
to 1inces; brown (10YR 5/3) loam,
high sand content; weak medium platy
structure; friable; common roots; neu-
tral; clear wavy boundary.
A&E-12 to 15 inches; brown (10YR 5/8) heavy
sandy loam (A2) ; weak medium platy
ST. CROIX COUNTY, WISCONSIN
structure; brown (7.6YR 4/4) heavy
sandy loam (B2t) ;moderate medium and
fine subangular blocky structure; friable;
common roots; about 15 percent coarse
fragments by volume; neutral; clear wavy
boundary.
IIB22t-15 to 24 .ches; reddish brown (5YR 4/4)
heavy sandy loam; moderate medium sub -
angular blocky structure; friable; few
roots; about 15 percent coarse fragments
by volume; medium acid; clear wavy
boundary.
IIBS-24 to 81 inches; reddish brown (5YR 4/4)
sandy loam; weak coarse subangular
blocky structure; friable; few roots;
about 15 percent coarse fragments by
volume; few strong brown (7.5YR 5/8)
sand coatings on faces of peels; slightly
acid; clear wavy boundary.
IIC—S1 to 60 inches; yellowish red (5YR 4/6)
sandy loam; massive; about 15 percent
coarse fragments by volume; friable; few
roots; slightly acid.
The solum ranges from 80 to 40 inches in thickness.
The Ap horizon is dark grayish brown or dark brown
sandy loam or loam 5 to 10 inches thick. In uncultivated
areas the A horizon is very dark brown or very dark
grayish brown and 2 to 4 Inches thick.
The B horizon is sandy loam or sandy clay loam. The
C horizon is mainly sandy loam, but it ranges to loamy
sand in places. The B and C horizons are 5 to 15 per-
cent coarse fragments. These soils are medium acid to
neutral in the B horizon and medium acid or slightly
acid in the C horizon.
Amery soils are near Cromwell and Santiago soils
and Jewett, sandy substratum. They lack the moderately
thick silt mantle and the loam B horizon typical of
Santiago soils and Jewett, sandy substratum, soils.
Also, Amery soils lack the sandy C horizon typical of
Cromwell soils and Jewett, sandy substratum, soils.
They contain more clay and less sand than Cromwell
soils.
A1B—Amery sandy loam, 2 to 6 percent slopes. This
soil is on ridges of ground moraines or on knolls and
foot slot of pitted glacial drift. Most areas are irregu-
lar in shape and range from 5 to 40 acres in size.
This soil has a profile similar to the one described as
representative of the series, but the subsoil is thicker
and the surface layer is sandy loam rather than loam.
Included with this soil in mapping are a few areas
of deep, silty soils and a few areas of Amery loams and
silt loams. Also included are a few small areas where
slopes are less than 2 percent or more than 6 percent.
Runoff is slow, and the hazard of erosion is slight.
This soil is subject to soil blowing.
Most areas of this soil are cultivated. The soil is mod-
erately well suited to corn, oats, alfalfa, and moat crops
commonly grown in the county. Controlling erosion and
soil blowing are important factors of good manage-
ment. Capability unit III"; woodland group 2o1.
A1C2--Ame sandy loam, 6 to 12 pereeet slopes,
eroded. This so is on end moraines and bitted glacial
drift. Most areas are irregular in shape and range from
5 to 60 acres in size.
This soil has a profile similar to the one described
11
as representative of the series, but its subsoil is thicker
and the surface layer contains more sand.
Included with this soil in mapping are a few small
areas of Amery loams and silt loams and Cromwell
soils. Also included are a few areas where layers of
silty sediment are in the till, a few small areas where
the soil is severely eroded and has a cobbly and gravelly
surface layer, and a few areas where slopes are leas
than 6 percent or more than 12 percent.
Runoff is medium, and the hazard of erosion is mod-
erate. Erosion has caused deterioration of the tilth and
has reduced the content of organic matter of the sur-
face layer in most places. This soil is subject to blowing.
This soil is suited to oats, alfalfa, and a limited
amount of corn. Controlling erosion and soil blowing
and maintaining tilth and organic matter content are
important factors of good management. Capability
unit IIIe-7; woodland group 2o1.
A1D2—Amery sandy loam, 12 to 25 percent slopes,
eroded. This soil is on pitted drift and end moraines.
Most areas are irregular in shape and range from 5 to
100 acres in size.
This soil has a profile similar to the one described as
representative of the series, but its surface layer is
sandy loam rather than loam.
Included with this soil in mapping are a few areas
of Amery loams and silt loams and a few areas of
Cromwell and Emmert soils. Also included are a few
areas where layers of silty sediment are in the till, a
few small areas where the soil is severely eroded and
has a cobbly and gravelly surface layer, and a few
small areas where slopes are less than 12 percent or
more than 25 percent.
Runoff is rapid, and the hazard of erosion is severe.
In most areas erosion has caused the filth to deteriorate
and has reduced the content of organic matter in the
surface layer. This soil is subject to blowing.
This soil is suited to hay, pasture, and woodland. It
is frequently used for pasture. Controlling erosion and
maintaining tilth and organic matter content are im-
ppoortant factors of good management. Capability unit
VIe-4; woodland group 2r1.
AmB—Amery loam, 2 to 6 percent slopes. This soil
is on ridges of ground moraines. Most areas are oblong
or irregular in shape and range from 10 to 40 acres
in size.
In most areas this soil contains more silt than the
one described as representative of the series, but other-
wise the two profiles are similar.
Included with this soil in mapping are a few small
areas where the surface layer is sandy loam. Also in-
cluded are a few small areas where the soil is under-
lain by sand and gravel and a few small areas where
slopes are slightly more than 6 percent.
Runoff is slow, and the hazard of erosion is slight.
This soil is well suited to corn, oats, and alfalfa. It is
frequently used for corn. Controlling erosion, especially
on relatively long slopes, is an important factor of good
management. Capability unit IIe-1; woodland group
2o1.
AmC2---Amery foam, 6 to 12 percent sloped eroded.
This soil is on end moraines and ridges of Xround
moraines. Most areas are oblong to round and range
from 5 to 60 acres in size. This soil has the profile de-
scribed as representative of the series.
12
SOIL sintvsY
Included with this soil in mapping are areas where
the surface layer is sandy loam. Also included are a
few small areas of Cromwell and Santiago soils and a
few small areas where slopes are slightly less than 6
percent or more than 12 percent.
Runoff is medium, and the hazard of erosion is mod-
erate. In many areas erosion has caused deterioration
of tilth and soil structure in the surface layer.
This soil is suited to oats, alfalfa, and a limited
amount of corn. Controlling erosion and maintaining
tilth are important factors of good management. Capa-
bility unit IIIe-1; woodland group 2o1.
AmD2—Amery loam, 12 to 20 percent dopes,
eroded. This soil is on narrow ridges of ground or end
moraines and on areas of pitted glacial drift. Most
areas are irregular in shape and range from 6 to 100
acres in size.
This soil has a profile similar to the one described
as representative of the series, but in most areas the
surface layer and subsoil are thinner.
Included with this soil in mapping are some areas
where the surface layer is sandy loam and a few areas
of Arland, Cromwell, and Santiago soils. Also included
are a few areas where the soil is severely eroded and
has a cobbly, gravelly, or sandy surface layer. In a few
small areas slopes are less than 12 percent or more than
20 percent.
Runoff is rapid, and the hazard of erosion is severe.
Erosion has caused deterioration of filth and soil struc-
ture in the surface layer.
This soil is suited to alfalfa and grasses for hay or
pasture. It is poorly suited to row crops. Controlling
erosion and maintaining filth are necessary to good
management. Capability unit IVe-2; woodland group
2r1.
AmE2--Amer loan, 20 to 30 pereent slopes,
eroded. This soi is on end moraines and pitted glacial
drift. Most areas are irregular in shape and range from
10 to 40 acres in size.
This soil has a profile similar to the one described
as representative of the series, except the surface layer
and subsoil are thinner.
Included with this soil in mapping are a few small
areas of Arland, Cromwell, and Whalan soils. Also in-
cluded are a few small areas where slopes are less than
20 percent or more than 80 percent.
Runoff is very rapid, and the hazard of erosion is
severe. In many areas erosion has caused deterioration
of tilth and soil structure in the surface layer.
This soil is suited to grasses for pasture. It isgen-
erally unsuited to row crops. It is well suited to white
pine, red oak, and hard maple. Slopes facing south and
southwest are less suited to trees than slopes facing
north and northeast. Controlling erosion is an impor-
tant factor of good management. Capability unit VIe—I;
woodland group 2r1.
AnC2—Amery-Cromwell sandy loans, 6 to 12 per-
cent slopes, eroded. The soils in this complex are on
end moraines and areas of pitted glacial drift. Most
areas are irregular in shape and range from 10 to 120
Acres in sire. These soils formed mainly in reddish
sandy loam till underlain by sand and gravel at vari-
ous depths.
This complex is about 60 percent Amery sandy loam,
80 percent Cromwell sandy loam, and 10 percent other
similar soils. Positions of these soils on the landscape
vary, but the Amery soil is mainly on ridgetops and in
slightly concave areas. The Amery soil is less eroded
than the Cromwell soil, which is mainly on the crests
of knolls and in convex areas.
The Amery soil has a profile similar to the one de-
scribed as representative of the series, but in most
places the surface layer is sandy loam rather than
loam. Also, in some areas the sandy loam till is under-
lain by loamy sand or sand and gravel at a depth of
3 to 5 feet. The Cromwell soil has a proffle similar to
the one described as representative of the series.
Included with these soils in mapping are uneroded
soils that have a surface layer of fine sandy loam, loam,
or silt loam. Also included are areas of deep, dark,
silty and loamy soils in drainageways; small areas of
sand and gravel on the crests of knolls where the soil
is severely eroded; some wet soils, ponds, and small
lakes in sinks and depressions; and some short slopes
that are less than 6 percent or more than 12 percent.
Runoff is medium, and the hazard of erosion is mod-
erate. In most areas erosion has caused filth to de-
teriorate and has reduced the content of organic matter
in the surface layer.
Most areas of this complex are cultivated. These
soils are moderately well suited mainly to oats, alfalfa,
and grasses and poorly suited to row crops. Some row
crops, mainly corn, are grown on the less sloping soils.
The short slopes in the complex are well suited to red
or white pine. Controlling erosion and soil blowing and
maintaining tilth and organic matter content are im-
portant factors of good management. Capability unit
IVe-4;-woodland-group 2ol.
AnD2—.Amerr.0romwell mmir pogma." to 25 per-
t open, a sons in complex are on end
moraines and areas of pitted drift. Most areas are
irregular in shape and range from 10 to 80 acres in
size. These soils formed mainly in reddish sandy loam
till that is underlain by sand and gravel at various
de the
This complex is about 45 percent Amery sandy loam,
35 percent Cromwell sandy loam, and 20 percent other
soils. Positions of these soils in the landscape vary, but
the Amery soil is mainly on ridgetopa and in slightly
concave areas. The Amery soil is less eroded than the
Cromwell soil, which is mainly on crests of knolls and
in convex areas.
The Amery soil has a profile similar to the one de-
scribed as representative of the series, but in most
places the surface layer is sandy loam rather than loam
Also, in some areas the sandy l
loam till is underlain by
loamy sand or sand and gravel at a depth of 3 to 5
feet. The Cromwell soil has a profile similar to the one
described as representative of the series.
Included with these soils in mapping are soils that
have a surface layer of fine sandy loam, loam, or silt
loam, and small areas of reddish clayey soils near ponds
and small lakes. Also included are small areas of deep,
dark, silty and loamy soils in drainageways; small areas
on the crests of knolls where the soil is sandy and
gravelly and severely eroded: areas of wet soils. ponds.
and small lakes in sinks and depressions; and areas
where slopes are less than 12 percent or more than 25
percent.
Runoff is rapid, and the hazard of erosion is severe.
vNscomn ueparvnern or aarery arm rroressronai z mites
Division of Industry Services
SOIL EVALUATION REPORT
In accordance with SPS 385. Vft Adm. Code County
Attach complete site plan on paper not less than 8 12 x 11 inches in size. Plan must include, ST CROIX
but not limited to vertical and horizontal reference point (BM), direction and peroerit slope, Paroel I.D.
scale or dimensions, north arrow, and location and distance to nearest road. 016-1032-95-050
Plan" print all information. Reviewed by
rage i or j
Date
Property Owner Property Location Cl
MICHEAL & JULIE LLKS GovL Lot NW % NW % S 15 T 30 N R 15 E (or) W
Property Owners Mailing Address Lot 9 Block i Subd. Name or CSMS
678 N STM ST OUTLOT 1 CSM 26.6010
CitY State zip Code Phone Number ❑ City ❑ Vftpe ® Town Nearest Road
NEW RICHMOND WI 54017 I- 1-90 -6 6,u, I I GLENWOOD 160n'AVE
® New c«sm,rtien Use. ® Residential/Nurnber orbedroorns. Code derived design flow raft �M GPD
❑ Replacement ❑ Pubic or commercial - Describe
Parent material GLACIAL DRIFT & LOESS Flood Plan elevation if applicable n. a. ft
General comments and reconvrendabons- POSSIBLE MOUND SITE. PENDING APPROVED INTERPRETIVE DETERMINATION REPORT, HAVING A
CENTERLINE LOCATED ON OR NEAR THE 86.6 CONTOUR
Boring a ❑ Boring® P[ Ground surface elev_ 84.3 fl
Depth to Writting factor 10 in
Mormon Depth Dominant Color Redox Description Texture Structure Consistence Boundary Roots
In. Munsell Qu Az. Cont Color Gr. Sz. Sh.
FsolApplicabon Rau
GPD/Ft2
•EfW1
'EWi82
1
0-5
7.5YR 3/2
—
sit
21sbk
mfr
ps
2m
0.6
0.8
2
5.10
10YR 5/4
—
1
2mabk
mtr
pw
1m
0.6
0.8
3
10-16
10YR 5/4
cif 7.5YR 516 lL
c2f 7.5YR 513
I
2mabk
Mir
dw
1f
0.6
0.8
4
16-40
7.5YR 416
c1d 7.5YR 5M 8
c2d 7.5YR 8!3
scl
lnrabk
m6
—
I
0.2
0.3
2] Borng * ❑ Boring
® Pi Ground surface elev. 89.2 ft.
Depth to limiting factor Z in.
Horizon
Depth
In.
Dominant Color
Munsell
Redox Description
Qu. Az. Cont. Color
Texture
Structure
Gr. Sz. Sh
Consistence
Boundary
Roots
GPD/Fe
'Ef►rR1
'Etkte2
1
0.5
7.6YR 32
—
so
21strk
mtr
ps
2t
0.6
0.8
2
5.7
10YR 514
—
sit
2mabk
mfr
pw
2m
0.6
0.8
3
7-15
10YR 5A
ctf 7.5YR 518 8
c2f 7.5YR 5/3
so
Zmabk
mG
the
1m
0.6
0.8
4
15-27
7.5YR 414
ctd 7.5YR 5/8lt
c2d 7.5YR 6/3
si
2mabk
nth
dertt
0.6
0.8
5
27-39
7.5YR 4/6
cid 7.5YR 518 d
c2d 7.5YR 6l3
ad
tnnbk
mfr
—
1f
0.2
0.3
CST Name (Please Print)
Sguw
CST Number
CHRIS FREDERICKS
71518
Address
Date E Corrducttd
Telephone Number
499 4 112 Ave, Clayton, Wl 54004
111712021
715A W0127
3 1 Boring r
U boring
® ait Ground surface Nov. 65.9 R
Depth to krrang factor I m-
.—.:_.:__ eW
Mormon
Depth
In.
Dorninant Color
Munsell
Redox Description
Ou. Az. Cont. Color
Texture
Structure
Gr. Sz. Sh.
Consistence
Boundary
Roots
GPDIFe
'EItr1
'Etfr2
1
0-5
7.5YR 312
—
sit
2fstik
n*
go
21
0.6
0.8
2
54
10YR514
—
sA
2matik
mft
gw
tm
0.6
08
3
8-12
10YR 514
elf 7.5YR 5I6 &
c217.5YR W
sit
2matik
nnfr
dw
1m
0.6
0.8
4
12-23
7.5YR 414
cid 7.5YR SM 8
c2d 7.5YR 6/3
SK
Zmstik
mfr
dw
1t
0.6
0.8
5
23-40
7.5YR 416
ctd 7.5YR 5/8 8
c2d 7.5YR 6(3
scl
lmstik
mh
1f
0.2
0-3
Boring If ❑ Boring
❑ P8 Ground surtaoe elev. _ A. Depthto hang fatlor _an.
j Horizon I Depth I Damnot Color I Rsdox Description I TexWm I Struckirs
. I�"� I ftxxhn I� ,��. .
❑ r 0 Boringpit
Ground surface elev. _ R. Depth to limiting factor _ in.
Honzon I Depth
I Mwvt CCU I Redox Description Qu Az. I Texture I Gr. I I Boun "'' I R°°" 'ERr W'EfN2
Effluent 01 - SOD. > 30 5 220 ngll and TSS > 30 s 150 ngrL ' EOkkrk r2.600. > 30 s 220 r glL and TSS > 30 s 150 nnglL
I
/1.0 A Avf
I . kjMl Elegy IQO,?�
LIP
io
— - - --qE d `� d+►
l L
` � M
O
� h}
!�E
I (KOf-J SC`�
I 4 P N'-
:lo� S�
rm y
Elto. $7, 3� F_ zED'i
tJnKf#
sD $o
0
exec woes >tl�reD
M�I� +� Svc=t lJtr1.
aw Lei 1 � ts.. j�-b<IJ
1'#►rt aF YW-Nw��f
<�T CI`iV 1Y f.OJ u7Y
e pr 7;rt&t
G ST=?p22 -Uqo
VvIScdnsin Ile
)
rage
Division of Indu
�j� /JFtxar(,)Bce
i or J
LI �� LOIL EVALUATION REPORT
APR '0 7.2022te with SPS 365. Wls. Adm: Code
Aftachcomplete
a plan on paper not loss thches in size. Plan must include,ST
CROIX
but rat limited to:
ertical
rtgefere, direction and percent slope,
Parcel I.D.
scale or dmens'
pI� road-
�nl
D16 1032-95-050
y eveloonearest
e�0n.
Reviewed by Date
Ply Owner Property Location ❑
MICHEAL & JULIE LUKS - GovL Lot NW Y. NW Y. S 15 T 30 N R /5 E (or) W
Property Owner's Mailing Address Lot t Block 0 I Subd. Name or CSM#
678 N 5" ST _ — OUTLOT 1 I I CSM 26 - 6010 _
City State Zap Code Phone Number ❑ City ❑ Village ® Town Nearest Road
NEW RICHMOND ( WI 154017 , L L90 - 6 'it.. -_—-LGLENYMO I.160TM AVE
I .. wraukxaron use: IN Residential/Number of bedrooms 3 Code derived design flow rate 450 GPD
❑ Replacement ❑ Public or commercial - Describe _
Parent material RI ACLAL DRIFT 8, LOE$S Flood Plan elevation if applicable n_a. It
General comments and recommendations: POSSIBLE MOUND SITE, PENDING APPROVED INTERPRETIVE DETERMINATION REPORT. HAVING A
CENTERLINE LOCATED ON OR NEAR THE 86.5' CONTOUR
a Boring # ❑ Boring — --- —
® Pit Ground surface elev. 84_3 ft. Depth to limiting factor 10 rn
—
Soil Application Rate
Horizon
Depth
In.
Dominant Color
Munsell
Redox Description
Ou Az. Cont Color
Texture
Structure
Gr. Sz. Sh.
Consistence
Boundary
Roots
GPD/Ft2
'Eff#1
'Eft2
1
0-5
7.5YR 3/2
—
sit
2fsbk
mfr
gs
2m
0.6
0.8
2
5-10
10YR 514
I
2mabk
mfr
gw
1m
0.6
08
3
10-16
10YR 5/4
cif 7.SYR 5/6 8
c2f 7.5YR 5/3
1
2mabk
mtr
dw
1f
0.6
0.8
4
16-40
7.5YR 4/6
c I d 7.5YR 518 d
c2d 7.5YR 613
sd
lmsbk
mfr
Boring # ❑ Boring
® Pd Ground surface elev. 89.2 ft. Depth to limiting factor 7 in.
-
Horizon
Depth
Dominant Color
Redox Description
Texture
Structure
Consistence
Boundary
Roots
GPD/FP_
In.
Munselt
Qu. Az. Cont. Colo
Gr. Sz. Sh
'EtfN1
'E1182
1
0-5
7.5YR 312
sit
2fsbk
mfr
gs
2f
0.6
0A
2
5-7
10YR 514
--
sit
2mabk
mfr
gw
2m
0.6
0.8
3
7-15
10YR 5/4
c1f 7.5YR 5/6 3
c2f 7.5YR 513
sill
2mabk
mfr
dw
tm
0.6
0.6
4
15-27
7.5YR 414
c1d 7.5YR 5/8 8
sill
2mabk
mfr
dw
I
0.6
0.8
_.
c2d 7.5YR 6/3
5
27-39
7,5YR 416
c1d 7.5YR W d
scl
lmsbk
mfr f
_
—
I
0.2
0.3
c2d 7 SYR 613
_-
CST Name (Please Prinq
- -- - ----- ---- ---
------- ---- ---
CST Number
CHRIS FREDERICKS — -_
_ �y
71818
Address
Date Evaluabo Conducted
Telephone Number
49941rzAve, Clayton, W 54004
111712021
715.419.0127
LJ bBorioring
3� If® Pi Ground surface elev. ALL R Depth to fmilirq facor $ in.
Sob Application Rate
Horizon
Depth
In
Dominant Color
Munsell-
Redox Description
Ou Az Cont. Color
Texture
Structure
Gr. Sz. Sh.
Consistence
Boundary
Roots
GPO/F?
•ERI1
-E1f#2
1
0-5
7.5YR 3/2
—
sit
2fsbk
mfr
gs
2f
06
08
2
5-8
10YR 514
—
sit
2mabk
mfr
gw
1m
0.8
0.8
3
8.12
1 OYR 514
elf T5YR 5/8 3
C217.5YR 5l3
sit
2mat>It
Mirdw
t m
06
0.8
4
12-23
7.5YR 414
cld 7.5YR 518 6
c2d 7.5YR 613
sit
2mebk
mfr
dw
1(
06
0.8
5
23-40
7.5YR 4/6
cld 7-5YR 518 d
c2d 7-5YR 613
ad
tmsbk
m
—
if
0.2
0.3
1-1Boring N [IBoring Cl PR Ground surface etev fl- Depth to IanAirtg factor _ in.
Sot. Aoolicat on Rata
Horizon
Depth
In.
Dominant Color
Munsell
Redox Description
Qu. Az. Cont. Color
Texture
Structure
Gr. Sz. Sh.
Consistence
Boundary
Roots
GPD/Ft'
•Efflrl
'Ef #2
❑ Boring N ❑ Boring —
❑ Pit Ground surface elev fl. Depth to limiting factor _ in.
Horizon Depth Dominant Color Redox Description Texture Structure Consistence Boundary Roots
In. Munsell Qu Az. Cont Color Gr Sz. Sh.
Sail lication Raro
GPD/Ftz
•Eff#1
•Ef #2
I
I
_
I
Effluent 01 - BOD. > 30 5 220 mg/L and TSS > 30 s 150 mg/L ' Effluent 02 = BOD. > 30 5 220 rrWL and TSS > 30 5 150 mg/L
tgj4j'L J62
WOO
A17,
CIO
At
vwq 'p,
i kfg
JAY 74- a f/
F
I ( 3 ww&AvrsK)
,;rNpix, COUNTY
ST
OWNER
PLUMBERSDR11::j;tCKSDN LIC.#S2 33
TOWN 0GLBI/I�iOQ�
SEC I,T__3p N, R.
AND/ �LOT
,�
aN(!�•3/P•?�i3l :INN
BLOCK WEEMENEEMENNOMW
SUBDIVISION
NO. 641942
PERMIT
S NO.now
r
CHAPTER 145.1i1f(21 WISCONSIN STATUTES
(a) The purpose of the sanitary permit is to allow installation
of the private sewage system described in the permit.
(b) The approval of the sanitary permit is based on
regulations in force on the date of approval.
(c) The sanitary permit is valid and may be renewed for a
specified period.
(d) Changed regulations will not impair the validity of a
sanitary permit.
(e) Renewal of the sanitary permit will be based on
regulations in force at the time renewal is sought, and that
changed regulations may impede renewal.
(f) The sanitary permit is transferable.
History: 1977 c.168; 1979 c. 34,221; 1981 c. 314
Note: If you wish to renew the permit, or transfer ownership of
the permit, please contact the county authority.
UT D ISSUING OFFICER - DATE Z
PERMIT EXPIRES UNLESS RENEWED BEFORE THAT DATE
POST IN PLAIN VIEW
VISIBLE FROM THE ROAD FRONTING THE LOT DURING CONSTRUCTION
SBD-06499 (Rl1/20)