Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutPlanning & Zoning 03-15-05 AGENDA PLANNING AND ZONING COMMITTEE ST CROIX COUNTY N OTICE OF ! TO: Clarence "Buck" Malick, Chairman, St. Croix County Board FROM: Jan Zoerb, Chairperson COMMITTEE TITLE: Planning and Zoning Committee DATE: Tuesday, March 15, 2005 TIME: 7:00 p.m. LOCATION: St. Croix County Government Center, Hudson, WI — Lower Level — Community Room CALL TO ORDER: ROLL CALL: ADOPTION OF AGENDA: DATE OF NEXT MEETING: ACTION ON PREVIOUS MINUTES: NEW BUSINESS: Discussion only — No action Public information meeting regarding the, proposed Land Division Ordinance and the proposed Complementary Changes to Chapter 17, Zoning Ordinance. The committee and staff will present the most recent versions of these amendments that were considered last August by the County Board. ANNOUNCEMENTS AND CORRESPONDENCE: POSSIBLE AGENDA ITEMS FOR NEXT MEETING: ADJOURNMENT (Agenda not necessarily presented in this order) SUBMITTED BY: St. Croix County Zoning Office DATE: March 8, 2005 COPIES TO: County Board Office Committee Members County Clerk News Media/Notice Board *CANCELLATIONS/ CHANGES /A MINUTES St. Croix County Planning and Zoning Committee March 15, 2005 St. Croix County Government Center, Hudson, Wisconsin Committee members present: Supervisors Jan Zoerb, Lois Burn, Buck Malick, Wally Habhegger and Brian Hurtgen Staff present: Dave Fodroczi, Robert Bezek and Alex Blackburn Chairperson Zoerb called the meeting to order at 7:00 p.m. and explained the meeting process. Dave Fodroczi explained that this meeting is for public information and is not a hearing. There were handouts available that summarized public comments and related changes for the Land Division Ordinance, as well as a handout of the proposed timeline for this process. Fodroczi went over the public comments section by section. Chapter 17 • A concern was expressed whether or not the handout was consistent with the draft of the ordinance that was available. Fodroczi identified that it was. • A concern was raised that many Towns do not have road or driveway standards in their subdivision ordinance. Fodroczi identified that if a Town has road standards that those would take precedence. Some similar language could be crafted for driveways. Land Division Ordinance Comments: • Two individuals raised the possibility that if a Town has lot design standards or a subdivision ordinance they should be exempt from the County ordinance. Fodroczi identified that the County has a precedent set for cooperative agreements with the Town of Troy. • 13.7.B.2. a & b (p.13 -26) contradict. One says the Town ordinance applies and one identifies "whichever is more exacting" takes precedence. • Concern was raised about creating slopes and how those would be treated. Fodroczi identified that those would be considered landscaping features and exempt from the standards. Fodroczi commented that County could distinguish between pre and post development. Another comment was made that they thought that there should be a minimum 10' elevation change before requiring a special exception permit:. • A comment was made that the language in section 13.G.3.b, c &d (p. 13 -48) the use of the term parcel is confusing or incorrect. The person identifying the concern will forward better language. • Representatives from the Land and Water Committee supported water quality standards in the ordinance. • A suggestion was made that access for a lot should be part of the, lot and not an easement. • A concern was raised that ghost platting may cause enforcement problems. It was also raised that the ordinance needs to better define where ghost platting would be allowed and that a better distinction needs to be made between Transitional Development Zone and extraterritorial plat jurisdiction. • Farmette lots should be allowed so an existing farm house does not have to be torn down. • Wording in 13.7.G.2. g & h should be changed to be less confusing. • One individual wanted the rounding rule changed to allow for rounding up instead of down. 1 Chairperson Zoerb thanked everyone for coming and reminded the towns that any ideas from them that will help the committee and staff to go in the right direction on these ordinance changes would be appreciated. After all comments were received, Zoerb declared the meeting adjourned at 9:40 p.m. Robert J. Bezek, Recorder Buck Malick, Secretary 2