Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout2917098U.S. PUBLIC LAND SURVEY MONUMENT RECORD= ADDENDUM- St. Croix County Index # 2917098 Point Table Point # Northing Easting Elevation 2917098 - 353951-764 594004.166 1162.835] DATUM: ST. CROIX COUNTY NAD83(1991) FIELD WORK DATE: 9/21/2022 SET 1" DIAMETER STEEL "'SURVEY MARK" NAIL FOUND 1-5/16" DIAMETER IRON PIPE WITH CAP 0 SET 5/8"X18" IRON REBAR WITH YELLOW CAP WEIGHING 1.04 LBS. PER LINEAR FOOT scolvs SET 1-5/16" DIAMETER X18 IRON PIPE WITH YELLOW CAP WEIGHING 1.68 LBS PER LINEAR FOOT --y UG1, I Corey M. Hughes, Professional Land Surveyor, St. Croix County S7 - Surveyor, Hereby certify that the corner location shown on this BALDWN, record was determined by me or under my direction and control WSCONSIP and that this U.S. Public Land Survey Monument Record Is correct and complete to the standards of AE-7 of Wisconsin Administrative Code tote best of my knowledge and belief. �"ti. ��:, e.�«-gym U.S. PUBLIC LAND SURVEY MONUMENT RECORD Computer file name: Disk #2, SE092917 — Derived from: Latitude of the marls --- DDMMSS North: - _.,_....,__,_ Elevation (height of the mark): Longitude of the mark — DDMMSS West: (1 METER = 3.2808333 FEET) St. Croix County Grid WHPGN: Northing: Northing: Easting: Easting: State Plane Coordinates: Northing: (FEE,) North ing: Easting: Easting: ALUMINUM CAP FOUND 1" IRON PIPE FOUND PLUGGED, REMEASURED --�— SIGN N GRAPEnC SCALE 1 ;0 or ear } FEET METERS (METERS) (METERS) TOWN OF HAMMOND � � 1 4 f�Y ......—J----1 ---- L--- i I Z rrr'rjirrrrrj�----j.y (d) Deserlbe any record evidence, occupational evidence, testimonial evidence or any other material evidence you considered, and whether the monument was found or placed. As part of a regular maintenance program, the entire township tie file was researched to find record of monuments previously set. All ties are scheduled to be upgraded to A—E7 standards regarding witness iron numbers. In addition, any monuments in danger of being disturbed for any reason or needing immediate attention are upgraded. (a) Describe any material discrepancy between the location of the corner as restored or reestablished and the location of that comer as previously restored or reestablished by distance and direction. Show the discrepancy on the plan view drawing under (d), above. Show the distances between the corner as previously restored or reestablished and (1) the corner as restored or reestablished. and (2) to at least 2 of the witness monuments shown on the drawing in (d), above. To my knowledge there is no discrepancy. The Monument appeared to be the intended corner monument. No additional measurements were made to adjacent PLSS corners for comparison with Government notes. The found position was witnessed. (f) Was the corner restored through acceptance of (1) an obliterated evidence location, or. (2) a found perpetuated location? (2) A found perpetuated location. (gaff) Was the corner reestablished through lost corner proportionate methods? If so, show the method, Including the directions and distances to other public land survey corners used as evidence or used for proportioning in determining the corner location? N o. Affix Land Surveyor Seal {i) 1. JomQs E. Rusch. St. Croix County S� urve,, (type or print name) certify that the comer location shown on this record was determined by me or under my direction and control and that this U.S. Public Land Survey Monument Record Is correct and complete to the best of my knowledge and belief. -5 1 Signature Orate U.- S. PUBLIC LAND SURVEY MONUMENT RECORD f 4 �\MM C) N -C'� I N S T R U C T I O N S This record shall show the location of the corner and shall Include all of the following nine elements (a through i). (a) identify the corner by reference to the U.S. public land survey system. 0 = Corner monument restored. -T'Zc)I\Jy Q,17W (b) Describe any record evidence, monument evidence, occupational evidence, testimonial evidence or a ny othe. r ma to r i a I ev i dense you cons i de red, and whe the r the monument wa s found o r p I aced. The monument of record was recovered, two tie irons were used as found and re - measured, and two new iron p.i pe were placed to aid in replacement after milling and reconstruction or repaving operations. (c) In the plan view drawing below, provide reference ties to at least 4 witness monuments, or, if the location Is within a municipality, to at least 2 witness monuments. (Witness monuments sha I I be made' of concrete, natural stone, iron or other equally durable material.} • Describe witness monuments. I�JI (d) Show a plan view drawing depicting the relevant 1 _ # ¢� monuments and reference ties which is sufficient in detail . to enable accurate relocation ; of the corner monument if the 1 corner monument i s d i stu rbed . Indicate north. `�► o f I RL�N P I PS- t ' OU NL) P' UC7 1n15i� i r7] , ° Pi Pa. V,l I T-H V Pi-u6)" Wc161N1/V6 ,AL UM i N v c A P 9 T TN, F Fvf` M I QUt,-- --—?4-- FAN GE- 0 P0V%) 0 (e) . Describe any material discrepancy between the location of the corner as restored or reestablished and the location of that corner as previously restored or reestablished by distance and direction. Show the discrepancy on the plan view drawing under (d), above. Show the distances between the corner as previously restored or reestablished and ( 1 ) the corner as restored or reestabi ished, and (2) to at least 2 of the witness monuments shown on the drawing in (d), above. (f) Was the corner restored through acceptance of (1) an obliterated evidence location, or, (2) a found pe'rpetua ted location? A found perpetuated location. (g&h) Was the corner reestablished through lost corner proportionate methods? If so, slow the method, including the directions and distances to other publ is land survey corners used as ev i'Aence or used for proportioning in determining the corner location? No (i) I, James E. Rusch St. Croix County Sarve oor ( type or print name) certify that the corner location shown on th i s record was determi ned by me or under my d i rection and control and .that this U.S. Public Land Survey Monument Record Is correct and complete to the best of my knowledge and belief. Syg ha t u re Da e ELM 80N 13104S ------.------- --- Affix Land Surveyor Seal' Jr I 40 �� i , -con ..0 1 NL 1 I 40 1 �, •:� f ------------------ n-91Be *err wood PRESY -ZVATION OF IV101'�JJMENTS fECTION SS,635 W ISCONSIN STATU'1`L5 ' Cl}Ur,tY........ ................................................TCROI x ,,.._.............................................. �f 1 HAM MOND c..T. H.. T.. C.T.H. E. A.N•D.100 d,H: AVE.. ...._.. , Sei:tiun No.... ... s0UTHEA.sT................................ ......, .. 47 T0......29.......... N. it ..................... `Type of Mununient................. BERNTSE N CAP IN 2 "' IRON PI PE ............ ...............,......................................... L.cxutiuji indic:uted on shetch --X— LOCATION SK E" I.Vii I"IRON PIPE SET 10 I" IRON PIPE'SET v I it IRON PIPE SET SIGN I" IRON PIPE FOU140 15 Thiel s aca fur culjy of liuld nuteu ur -tied to the above dcmeribed man mentm, INSTRUCTiON5: This record shall show the location of the, corner and shall, include all of the following nine elements (a through i),. a. Identify the corner by reference to the U. S. public land survey system. p = Corner monument restored. i b. Show a plan view drawing depicting the relevant monuments and reference ties which is sufficient in detail to enab16 accurate relocation of the corner inunumenC if the corner monument 15 disturbed. Indicate north. c, lit the plan view drawing, provide referulice tics to at least 4 witness niouulnents, or, if the location is within a inunieipaliry to at least 2 wi tness monuments . (.Witness Inunuments shall be I" x 24" iron pipes) . d. Was the corner restored through acceptance of (1) an obliterated evidence location, or, (2) a found perpetuated location? ` FOUND. PERPETUATED I DCAT2 aN ST.. CROIX COUNTY SURVEYOR' - OFFICE Date APR 3 0 1984 FILED Describe an rde y reco vi d nce, monument evidence, occupational evidence, testimonial evidence*'or any other material evidence you considered, and whether the monument was found or placed. Excavatioa may be necessary and is strongly recommended. A LAND SURVEY WAS ?ORMED BY.JAMS L. MURPHY, S-1042, IN WHICH HE NOTES A P.K. NAIL SET AT .THIS CORNERS LOCATION. THIS CORNER IS THE N.E. CORNER OF THE LAND INVOLVED. THIS P.K. NAIL WAS RECOVERED AND CHECKED AGAINST THE LOT CORNERS AND WAS FOUND TO FIT. I ACCEPTED THIS LOCATION AND SET THE CORNER HME. NO ORIGINAL EVIDENCE WAS FOUND. f. Describe any material discrepancy betwt:en the location of. the eornar as restored or reestablished and the location of that corner as -previously restored or reestablished by distance and direction. Show the discrepancy on. the plan view drawing under b. Show the distances between the corner as previously.restored or reestablished and (1) the corner as restored or reestablished, and (2) to at least 2 of the witness monuments shown on the drawing in b. NONE li. Was the turner reestablished through lost corner proportionate methods? If so, slow the method', including the directions and distances to other public land Survey corners -used as evidence or use for proportioning in determining the cormer location`! NO , I. URENCE W. MURPHY (type or print name) certify that the corner location shown on, this record was determined by sue or under my direction and contKul' and that Chis U. S. Public Land Survey Monument Record is correct and complete to the best of my knowledge and belief. S gnature ' Date Affix Land Surveyor Seal wo . SG o N ,20 040 •LAURENCE3 • • ,- M W MURPHY 1713 = • *' :RIVER FALLS •` • p.A ,,,,; • �t4 •� = WiSC. �9 ++ ��•..s......