The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About2818017t. t €�' ! :� 4i LAND .e..� �, [ MONUMENT RECORD- ADDENDUM- P: a Croix County Index # 2818017 Point Table Point # Northing Easting :Elevatijon2818017 327750.865 575613,898 DATUM: ST. CROIX C (11 FIELD WORK /17/2 22 Describe any record v vi c, testimonial vi r any other material evidence considered r the monument was foundor restored though acceptance of an obliterated location. AUGUST 17, 2022 FRAN B. AND I VISITED THIS CORNER TO FIND THAT THE SURVEY MARK NAIL WAS GONE. I FOUND 3 OF RUSCH'S TIES IN GOOD CONDITION AND USING SAID TIES I SET A SURVEY MARK NAIL AT THE CORNER 1' NORTH OF CENTERLINE. ONE OF RUSCH'S TIES TO THE NORTHEAST WAS HIT, I PULLED AND RE —SET THE PIPE AND FOUND 2 ADDITIONAL IRON PIPES AS SHOWN. V) 0 �/ n Uj w *1�;�i/ U � Z O U � 00'44`31 "E 44.1 019N 01 *11'53"E OL 32.729 Uj .00 ®� �10 C.T.H. N ®Cb ®® 4 BRUSH J 0LEGEND Q SET 1 " DIAMETER STEEL "SURVEY MARK" NAIL FOUND 1-5/16" DIAMETER IRON PIPE WITH CAP SET 1-5/16" DIAMETER X30" IRON PIPE WEIGHING 1.68 LBS. PER LINEAR FOOT IN FOUND 1" DIAMETER IRON PIPE I Corey M. Hughes, Professional Land Surveyor, St. Croix County Surveyor, Hereby certify that the corner location shown on this record was determined by me or under my direction and control and that this U.S. E;R ublic Land Survey�fi E ,� t „v ��S onumecory6 correctIs and complete 4 fi the 'tip' standards o p' f#} $`Wisconsin Administrative Code to the best of my knowledge and belief. Computer file name:. Disk #1, 5-01281 8 Derived from: Latitude of the mark — DDMMSS North: Elevation (height of the mark): FEET Longitude of the mark -- DDMMSS West: (I METER 3.2808333 FEET) METERS St. Croix County Grid WIPGN: Northing: (FEET) Northing: (METERS) Easting: Easting: State Plane Coordinates: Northing: (FEET) Northing: (METERS) Easting: Easting: MWN OF KINNICKINNIC RAIL ROAD SPIKE FOUND (6/4/97) "SURVEY MARK" NAIL SET (3/24/98) i co 1" ]RON PIPE FOUND, PLUGGED AND REM EASU RED e "X3D" _ PLASTICAP IN 1 IRON PIPE NEIGHING 1_68 LBS./FT., SET [ cn SIGN T28N, R GRAPHIC SCALE C 70 20 I Lim MR NEENIMMEM (INS) (d) Describe any record evidence, occupational evidence, testimonial evidence or any other material evidence you considered, and whether the monument was found or placed. As part of a regular maintenance program, the entire township tie file was researched to find record of monuments previously set. All ties are scheduled to be upgraded to A—E7 standards regarding witness iron numbers. In addition, any monuments in danger of being disturbed for any reason or needing immediate attention are upgraded. (e) Describe any material discrepancy between the location of the corner as restored or reestablished and the location of that corner as previously restored or reestablished by distance and direction. Show the discrepancy on the plan view drawing under (d), above. Show the distances between the corner as previously restored or reestablished and (1) the corner as restored or reestablished, and (2) to at least 2 of the witness monuments shown on the drawing in (d), above. To my knowledge there is no discrepancy. The R.R. spike appeared to be the intended corner monument. No additional measurements were made to adjacent PLSS corners for comparison with Government notes. The found position was witnessed. After reconstruction a Berntsen "SURVEY MARK" nail was set using witness irons previously set from R.R. spike. (f) Was the comer restored through acceptance of (1) an obliterated evidence location, or, (2) a found perpetuated Iocctlon? (2) A found perpetuated location. (g&h) Was the corner reestablished through lost comer proportionate methods? If so, show the method, including the directions and distances to other public land survey corners used as evidence or used for proportioning in determining the corner location? N o. (i)1. a (type or print .namejccertify�that the omerlo location sh- _ Countyoow _ e c !ion spawn on this record was determined by me or under my direction and control and that this U.S. Public Land Survey Monument Record is correct and complete to the best of my knowledge and belief. 4i cl Signature D e PRESEF • OF MON 1"4ENTS., ._. N SECTION 59,635 WISCONSIN STATUTES COunty.......S . Croix .............................. ................................... Tow d1...Ki,n.niC1<innic ........................ ighway........C..T•H. t'N}4....... ..............-.....--...._.... Sectiun Nu ........ I... ...................... T-----. 8. .. N. It ......... is ... --w............................. 'Type of Munument...... ailro.. ......ad spike set .-.- ................................ Luc atiun indicaLed on skeLeh —X-- LOCATION SKE"11CH 9 � . q RA1C..,40AD SPIKE SET - -r s ro J ND ICA TES " x ?4" IRON PIPE SET This zipacd fur culjy of field nutes ur tied to the above duseribed monuments INSTRUCTIONS: This record shall show the location of the.corner and shall include all of the following nine elements (a througl} .i).. a. identify the earner by referee-ce to the U. S. public land survey system. 0 = Corner monument restored. b. Show a plan view drawing depicting the relevant monuments and reference: ties which is sufficient in detail to enable accurate relocation of the corner monument if the corner monument i5 disturbed. Indicate north, c. In the plan view drawing, provide----referene-e tics to at 7.1east 4 witness monuments, or, if the location is within a municipality to at least 2 witness monuments. (Witness monuments shall b` I" x 24" iron pipes) . r r d. Was the corner restored through acceptance of (1) an obliterated evidence location, or, (2) a found perpetuated location? (1} e. Describe any reco- evidence, monument evider , occupational evidence,_ testimonial evide„ -e or any other inaterial ev-.pence you considered, and whether the monument was found or placed. Excavation may be necessary and is strongly recommended. I placed a railroad spike on centerline of C.T.H. 'IN" in line with North and South line fences. This position reasonably fits 1/16 corner positions to the East and West. No original evidence was found. I believe this occupation position best represents the original corners position. f _ Describe any mat-erial discrepa-ne--y betxjeen the location of. the corner as restored or reestablished and the location of that corner as previously restored or reestablished by distance and direction. Slow the discrepancy on the }plan view drawing under b. Show the distances between the corner as previously , restored or reest-ablished- and ( 1) the corner as restored or reestablished, and (2) to at least 2 of the witness monuments shown on 'the drawing in b. None , h . Was the corner reestablished through lost corner proportionate methods? If so, show the meth-c-d; --includi-ng -t-h-e directions ---and distances ..to ot-her public land survey corners used as evidence or use for proportioning in determining the . cormer location'? no Laurence W . Murphy (type or print name) certify that the corner location shown on this record was determined by lie or under my direction and control and that this U. S. Public Land Survey Monument Record is correct and complete to the best of my knowledge and belief. Si Date Affix Land Surveyor Seal ��.a�' ,S C O LAURENC m W MURRHY Q Ln S 1713 = a� tJ� =.RIVER FALLS I Ca LAND U.S. PUBLIC LAND SURVEY MONUMENT RECORD Computer file name:__ Disk #1, S— 012818 M Latitude of the mark -- DDMMSS North: Longitude of the mark — DDMMSS West: St. Croix County Grid WFiPGN: Northing: (FEET) Easting: State Plane Coordinates: Northing: (FEET) Easting: RAIL ROAD SPICE FOUND (6/4/97) "SURVEY MARK" NAIL SET (3/24/98) i 1" IRON PIPE FOUND, PLUGGED AND REMEASURED a PLASTICAP IN 1"X30" IRON PIPE WEIGHING 1.68 LBS./FT., SET -�- SIGN N GRAPHIC SCALE 0 10 20 (INS') 0 Derived from: Elevation (height of the mark): (1 DETER o 3.2808333 FEET) Northing: (METERS) Easting: Northing: (METERS) Easting: TOWN OF KINNICKINNIC T28N9 R1 8W FEET METERS (d) Describe any record evidence. occupational evidence, testimonial evidence or any other material evidence you considered, and whether the monument was found or placed. As part of a regular maintenance program, the entire township tie file was researched to find record of monuments previously set. All ties are scheduled to be upgraded to A—E7 standards regarding witness iron numbers. In addition, any monuments in danger of being disturbed for any reason or needing immediate attention are upgraded. (a) Describe any material discrepancy between the location of the comer as restored or reestablished and the location of that comer as previously restored or reestablished by distance and direction. Show the discrepancy on the plan view drawing under (d), above. Show the distances between the corner as previously restored or reestablished and (1) the comer as restored or reestablished, and (2) to at least 2 of the witness monuments shown on the drawing to (d), above. To my knowledge there is no discrepancy. The R.R. spike appeared to be the intended corner monument. No additional measurements were made to adjacent PLSS corners for comparison with Government notes. The found position was witnessed. After reconstruction a Berntsen "SURVEY MARK" nail was set using witness irons previously set from R.R. spike. (f) Was the corner restored through acceptance of (1) an obliterated evidence location, or, (2) a found perpetuated location? (2) A found perpetuated location. (ga:h) Was the comer reestablished through lost comer proportionate methods? If so, show the method, Including the directions and distances to other public land survey corners used as evidence or used for proportioning in determining the corner location? No. (i) 1 roix Countyv type or print name certify that the corner location shown on this record was determined by me or under my direction and control and that this U.S. Public Land Survey Monument Record is correct and complete to the best of my knowledge and belief. A -7 9 Signature Ddte r�-------------------- Affix Land Surveyor Seal I i 1 l I 1 1 I 1 I 1 I 1 I I 1 I 1 i I I 1 i 1 1 I 1 1 I � PRESEr STATION OF MONT"44ENTS SECTION 59,635 WI3CONSIN STATU'I'k:S Coun Ly.......5t.' ...Croix............................................................................... TUwII...K1nniC1<innic.................................................. ............................ C.T.H. 'IN" Hixhwuy ............................................................................................. Sect,iun No ....... �.. $Puth..I/A. qom-i;!r ......................... ........................... T...... 28.......... N. 1{.........18........W........................................................ __�. _._ ...»_. Type of Munument...... Railroad spike set.,....,. •, ........................... 14 Locutimi indicated on skeLch --X- LOCATION SKETCH - V s� h2 • � RAILROAD SPI xE SfT 6 s. a t NDICA TES " x 24" IRON �. PIPE SET 1 , This skacd fur euljy of fiuld nutes ur ties to the above de8cribc:d moiwtnents INSTRUCTIONS: This record shall show the location of the. corner and shall Include all o f the f ollowing nine e luments ( a th ruu�;li Li )" a. identify the corner by reference to the U. S. public land survey system. O = Corner monument restored. b. Show a_plan view drawing depicting the relevant monuments and reference ties which is sufficient in detail to enable accurate relocation of the corner monument if the cornea- monument is disturbed. Indicate north. C. In the plan view drawing, provide --reference tics to at 'least 4 witness monuments, or, if the location is within a municipality to at least 2 witness monuments. (Witness munuments shall be I" x 24" iron pipes) . d. Was the corner restored through acceptance of (1) an obliterated evidence location, or, (2) a found perpetuated location? e. Describe any reco: evidence, monument evfder , occupational evidence,_ testimonial evide-L--a or any other material ev�,ience you considered, and whether the monument was found or. placed. Excavation may be necessary and is strongly recommended. I placed a railroad spike on centerline of C.T.H. "N" in line with North and South sine fences. This position reasonably fits 1/16 corner positions to the East and West. No original evidence was found. I believe this occupation position best represents the original corners position. f. Describe any mat-eri-al discrepa-ne--y between the location of. the corner as restored or reestablished and the location of that corner as previously restored or reestablished by distance and direction. Show the discrepancy on -ttie plan view drawing under b. Show the distances between the corner as previously , restored or reest-ablished- and (1) the corner as restored or reestablished, and (2) to at least 2 of the witness monuments shown on 'the drawing in b. None &h. Was the corner reestablished through lost corner proportionate methods? r If ;;o, show the- meth-o-d- --inc-ludi-ng -t-h-e directions. ---and distances -to. other public land survey corners used as evidence or use for proportioning in determining the . cormer location'? no i. I, Laurence W. Murphy (type or print name) certify that the corner location shown on.this record was determined by me or under my direction and control and that. this U. S. Public Land Survey Monument Record is correct and complete to the best of my knowledge and belief. Si fiat re Date Affix Land Surveyor Seal #♦ %%%J 11 t t:111 ,5 C C N's qb d LAURENCE •' M M W MURRHY S 1713 A •..RIVER FALLS,..I ry y� <<1, •,�� LAND