HomeMy WebLinkAbout2818018Oun"'S PUBLIC LAND SURVEY MONUMENT RECORD-
ADDENDUM- St. Croix County Index # 2818018
Point Table
Point Northing Fasting Elevation
c1tio 2818018 327693-989 576292.352 1029.98
DATUM: ST. CROIX COUNTY HAD83(1991)
FIELD WORK DATE: 8/24/2022
T. 28 N, R.18 W.
0.7' SOUTH OF SURVEY SIGN
Li
0 zi
<1
FENCELINE X X
wl
56'
z ®® V SOUTH ®F FENCELINE AND
q 0.5* SOUTH OF SURVEY SIGN
+'r�x .Jp10 V.-
N-0
, ep
�e
C.T.H. N
1
FF. 15
ZIF Jb
A
14' NORTH ®F FENCEUNE AND
0.5" NORTH OF SURVEY SIGN
I
A L I I
FOUND 1-5/16" DIAMETER IRON PIPE
RECORDED DIMENSION
I Corey M. Hughes, Professional Land Surveyor, St® Croix C®
Surveyor, Hereby certify that the corner location she on this
record was determined by me or under my direction and control
and that this U.S. Public Land Survey Monument Record is
correct and complete to the standards of AE-7 of Wisconsin
Administrative Code to the best of my knowledge and belief.
U.S. PUBLIC LAND SURVEY MONUMENT RECORD
Computer file name: Disk #17 SW062817
Latitude of the mark — DDMMSS North:
Longitude of the mark — DDMMSS West:
St. Croix County Grid WHPGN:
Northing: (FEET)
Easting:
State Plane Coordinates:
Northing: (FEET)
Easting:
Derived from:
Elevation (height of the mark):
(1 METER = 3.2808333 FEET)
Northing: (METERS)
Easting:
Northing: (METERS)
Easting:
1" IRON PIPE FOUND PRIOR TO RECONSTRUCTION
"SURVEY MARK" NAIL SET (3/24/98)
1" IRON PIPE FOUND, PLUGGED,
AND REMEASURED
-a- SIGN
T® OF PLEASANT VAUZY
FEET
METERS
I
(d) Describe any record evidence, occupational evidence, testimonial evidence or any other material evidence
you considered, and whether the monument was found or placed.
As part of a regular maintenance program, the entire township tie file was
researched to find record of monuments previously set. All ties are scheduled
to be upgraded to A—E7 standards regarding witness iron numbers. In addition,
any monuments in danger of being disturbed for any reason or needing immediate
attention are upgraded.
(e) Describe any material discrepancy between the location of the corner as restored or reestablished
and the location of that corner as previously restored or reestablished by distance and direction.
Show the discrepancy on the plan view drawing under (d), above. Show the distances between the
corner as previously restored or reestablished and (1) the corner as restored or reestablished, and
(2) to at least 2 of the witness monuments shown on the drawing in (d), above.
To my knowledge there is no discrepancy. The 1" pipe appeared to be the
intended corner monument. No additional measurements were made to adjacent
PLSS corners for comparison with Government notes. The found position was
witnessed.
After construction, a Berntsen "SURVEY MARK" nail was set using witness irons
previously set from 1" pipe.
(f) Was the corner restored through acceptance of (1) an obliterated evidence location, or, (2) a found
perpetuated location?
(2) A found perpetuated location.
(g&h) Was the comer reestablished through lost corner proportionate methods? if so, show the method,
including the directions and distances to other public land survey comers used as evidence or used
for proportioning In determining the corner location?
N o.
(') , ...................=- ,- unty Surveyor,
� � (type
James E. Ru �ch SY,_ Croix o.
t e or print name certify that the comer location shown
on this record was determined by me or under my direction and
control and that this U.S. Public Land Survey Monument Record is
correct and complete to the best of my knowledge and belie'.
4 /- I /r-) a
Signature I Da
U.S. PUBLIC LAND SURVEY MONUMENT RECORD
Computer file name:_ Disk #1, SW062817
Latitude of the mark — DDMMSS North:
Longitude of the mark -- DDMMSS West:
St. Croix County Grid WHPGN:
Northing:
(FEET)
Easting:
State Plane Coordinates:
Northing: (FEET)
Easting:
Derived from:
Elevation (height of the mark):
(1 METER — 3.2808333 FEET)
Northing:
(METERS)
Easting:
Northing:
(METERS)
Easting:
MWN OF PLEASANT VALLEY
1" IRON PIPE FOUND PRIOR TO RECONSTRUCTION
"SURVEY MARK" NAIL SET 3 24 98f
S 1 " IRON PIPE FOUND, PLUGGED,
AND REMEASURED z
SIGN
FEET
METERS
4
;
>
i
i i
z
T28N, R17W
IX
ij
(d) Describe any record evidence, occupational evidence, testimonial evidence or any other material evidence
you considered, and whether the monument was found or placed.
As part of a regular maintenance program, the entire township tie file was
researched to find record of monuments previously set. All ties are scheduled
to be upgraded to A—E7 standards regarding witness iron numbers. In addition,
any monuments in danger of being disturbed for any reason or needing immediate
attention are upgraded.
(a) Describe any material discrepancy between the location of the comer as restored or reestablished
and the location of that corner as previously restored or reestablished by distance and direction.
Show the discrepancy on the plan view drawing under (d), above. Show the distances between the
corner as previously restored or reestablished and (1) the comer as restored or reestablished, and
(2) to at least 2 of the witness monuments shown on the drawing in (d). above.
To my knowledge there is no discrepancy. The 1" pipe appeared to be the
intended corner monument. No additional measurements were made to adjacent
PLSS corners for comparison with Government notes. The found position was
witnessed.
After construction, a Berntsen "SURVEY MARK" nail was set using witness irons
previously set from 1" pipe.
(f) Was the comer restored through acceptance of (1) an obliterated evidence location, or, (2) a found
perpetuated location?
(2) A found perpetuated location.
(gAch) Woo the corner reestablished through lost corner proportionate methods? If so, show the method,
including the directions and distances to other public land survey corners used as evidence or used
for proportioning in determining the comer location?
No.
Afflx Land Surveyor Seal
(i) I. James E. Rusch, St. Croix. County Surve, or,
(type or print name) certify that the comer location shown
on this record was determined by me or under my direction and
control and that this U.S. Public Land Survey Monument Record is
correct and complete to the best of my knowledge and belief.
4
A /
Signature/Datb
PRESFqRVATION OF MOV 'MEN'rS
SECTION 59,635 WIBCON'SIN STATUTES
County ...... St....Cr. o.ix..County........................................
Town ....... F.lmasa nt-Val-Lay .................... ,.........................._.............._. .
Highwily...... .C.. T. H ...=TN'T_....................._................,..,......................._.....
Sectiuii Nu..... •car.Iger.................................................... _ __ ___ --
`i....... ?g........... N. lt......17..........lr1r........................................_............_._....
Type Uf Muriument............
-diemeter,-4--�o -pipe -fownd................
Lcx:utiuti itidicuted ors :skut,ch--X--•- LUGA'i'lUN SKL`i1CH
s
P/PE FDUIND
r02
� Tr
le
a�
b.
12h
Q /INDICATES
/ 00 X I RC/Pif
- PI PE SE7"
.__ This Space for cou of tiuld nott-ts ur ties to the ubuve duac:ribc:d nlunumcuta.
INSTRUCTIONS: This record shall show the location or the co
include all of the Following; nine elements (a through i) • . rner and Shall
e. identify the corner by reference to the U. S. public land survey s stern.
0 = Corner monument restored. y
b. Show a plan view drawing depicting; the relevant monuments and reference
Lies which is sufficient in detail to enable accurate relocation of the
curner monument if the corner monument is disturbed. Indicate north.
c. In the plan view drawing, 1)r.ovi-de.-retorencte ti-c,s to'at 'least 4 witness
monuments, or, if the loom j ()ri is withitl a 111ilr1icipality to at least 2
witness utonuments. (Witness monuirrents Shall be 1" x 24" iron pipes) .
d. Was the corner restored through acceptance of (1) an obliterated
evidence location, or, (2) a found perpetuated location?
(2)
e Describe any recot\-_,.evidence, monument evidence, occupational evidence,
testimonial evidence or any other material evidence you considered, and
whether the moiiument was found or placed. Excavation may be necessary
and is strongly recomnien'ded.
A 1" diameter iron pipe was found on centerline of C.T.H. "N" in line with North/South
line fences. It fits the gov. distance to the South by less than I foot and fits
15 corner occupation to the West very well. No original evidence was found. I
believe this pipe best represents this corners origianal position.
f . Describe any material diserep-a-no-y bet.ueen the location of, the corner as
restored or reestablished and the location of that corner as previously
restored or reestablished by distance and direction. Show the discrepancy
on the plan view drawing under b. Show the distances between the corner
as previously restored or reestablished and (1) the corner as restored
or reestablished, and (2) to at least 2 of the witness monuments shown
on the drawing in b.
None
,,tt. Was the corner reestablished through lost corner proportionate methods?
If so, show the -mettra-& -including the directioria--end distan-ces,-to_.o.r-her .
public land survey corners used as evidence or use for proportioning in
determining the -cornier location?
No
(type or
print
name5.certify that
the corner
location
shown
on. this record was
determined
by me or
under
any direction and control
and
that this
U. S.
Public Land Survey
Monument
Record is
correct and complete to
the best
of my knowledge
and belief.
Sig[ at u're Date
Affix Land Surveyor Seal
`ttkti1flIlilt.
xv ,Sc00
r'O LAURENCE\
rr1 W MURPHY # •
err Y d
- S 1 713 a.
CA.,RIVER FALLS, S �0
40
�, t A N �,•