HomeMy WebLinkAbout3016032US PUBLIC LAND SURVEY MONUMENT RECORD-
ADDENDUM- St. Croix County Index # 3016032
Point Table
Point # Northing Easting Elevation
960,
[30160327396048.547 626601.224 1074-44
DATUM: ST. CROIX COUNTY NAD83(1991)
FIELD WORK DATE: 10/6/2022
Describe any record evidence, monument evidence, testimonial evidence or any other
material evidence considered and whether the monument was found or restored though
acceptance of an obliterated location.
JULY 21, 2022 FRAN B. AND I VISITED THIS CORNER AND FOUND A P.K. NAIL 11, NORTH OF CENTERLINE AT THE
CORNER IN GOOD CONDITION. I FOUND 1 OF RUSCH'S TIES IN GOOD CONDITION, THE OTHER 3 WERE FOUND
LEANING IN THE MARSH.
OCTOBER 6, 2022 FRAN B AND I RETURNED TO THE CORNER AFTER A PAVING PROJECT AND FOUND THE P.K.
NAIL HAD BEEN REMOVED DURING CONSTRUCTION. I FOUND THE I PREVIOUS TIE AND USING PREVIOUS
MEASUREMENT I SET A SURVEY MARK NAIL AT THE PREVIOUS CORNER LOCATION AND ESTABLISHED 3 NEW TIES
AS SHOWN. THE CORNER FALLS 1' NORTH OF CENTERLINE.
N72"30'29'"E
37.35'
DOYM 6" IN SHOULDER
D® 6` IN SHOULDER
1" NORTH OF PAVEMENT
V NORTH OF PAVEMENT
sue
cop
4/0
left
C.T.H. S I I%W. 1.4k
CV i
IS68'027"37"E
DOWN S" IN SHOULDER
1' SOUTH OF PAVEMENT
L
j
38.43'
L4 0.6° NNE OF SURVEY SIGN
LEGE D
IN
qV
SET 1" DIAMETER STEEL "SURVEY MARK" NAIL
0
FOUND 1-5/16" DIAMETER IRON PIPE
0
SET 5/8"X18" IRON REBAR WITH YELLOW
CAP WEIGHING 1.04 LBS. PER LINEAR FOOT
(R.A.)
RECORDED AS
C OjV
5 S -
A 0 --
U.S. PUBLIC LAND SURVEY MONUMENT RECORD
Computer file name: Disk #1, N-033016 Derived from:
Latitude of the mark -- DDMMSS North: Elevation (height of the mark): FEET
Longitude of the mark — DDMMSS West: (1 METER = 3.2808333 FEET) METERS
St. Croix County Grid WHPGN:
Northing: —.-- - Northing:
g (METERS)
Easting: Easting:
State Plane Coordinates:
Northing:
Easting:
(FEET)
P.K. NAIL FOUND, SET BY OTHERS
40 1" IRON PIPE FOUND
(PREVIOUSLY SET 9/12/90)
-II- SIGN
S 1 /4 CORNER
SEC. 35,T31 N,R16W
Oki=
623.170$
Northing:
Easting: _
(METERS)
MWW OF DAERALD
www �wn.'ww; rwww� www
wrr.rr��r rrrr rwr�..wwr
I 1 I
f i I
r rr�- ww wTww wwr---
1 I I
T30N, R16W
66,
Jl.
(d) Describe any record evidence, occupational evidence, testimonial evidence or any other material evidence
you considered, and whether the monument was found or placed.
As part of a regular maintenance program, the entire township tie file was
researched to find record of monuments previously set. All ties are scheduled
to be upgraded to A—E7 standards regarding witness iron numbers. In addition,
any monuments in danger of being disturbed for any reason or needing immediate
attention are upgraded.
(e) Describe any material discrepancy between the location of the corner as restored or reestablished
and the location of that corner as previously restored or reestablished by distance and direction.
Show the discrepancy on the plan view- drawing under (d), above. Show the distances between the
corner as previously restored or reestablished and (1) the corner as restored or reestablished, and
(2) to at least 2 of the witness monuments shown on the drawing in (d), above.
This corner was not set with the 1853 Town subdivision by John Ryan. Originally
I had accepted existing occupation to the south to position the monument on
the senior line of Section 35—T31N, R16W. Messrs. Johnson and Canaday used
occupation interior in Section 3 to determine a position about 13.7' east and on
the Senior line. My ties are revised accordingly. The S1/4 Corner of Section 35
T31 N, R16W was previously set by single proportion, with each 1 /2 mile being about
4.3' short. The actual falling of the N1 /4 Corner is about 28.1' short of the
computed original position; the NW Corner of Section 3 is about 28.8' short of
Government; and the total mile is about 20.2' longer than Government.
(j Was the comer restored through acceptance of (1) an obliterated evidence location, or. (2) a found
perpetuated location?
Ties are for a P.K. nail set by two other surveyors, Ronald Johnson and Bradley
Canaday, based on obliterated evidence location.
(g&h) Was the corner reestablished through lost corner proportionate methods? If no, show the method,
Including the directions and distances to other public land survey comers used as evidence or used
for proportioning in determining the comer location?
No.
(1) i, James E. Rusch St. Croix County Surveyor,
(type or print name) certify that the corner location shown
on this record was determined by me or under my direction and
control and that this U.S. Public Land Survey Monument Record Is
correct and complete to the best of my knowledge and belief.
ature Date
rrrra...rwr wwww wwww wwww w�
i Affix Land Surveyor Seal
al"11101
IS HuIsofI
"+ 'i a