HomeMy WebLinkAbout2818027TTS
U PUBLIC LAND SURVEY MONUMENT RECORD-
ADDENDUM- St. Croix County Index # 2818027
Point Table
Point Northing Easting Elevation
2818027 327775.175 570319.708 960.70
DATUM: ST. CROIX COUNTY NAD83(1991)
FIELD WORK DATE: 8/17/2023
T. 28 N, R.18 W=
C.T.H. N
S00"09743"E
3,3.22"
(33.00')
ON FORESLOPE go NNE ®F PP
S00*22200"W
4r7!0
FENCELINE
C 9
51.15
X X
0�/
Z
LU
z
1
1' EAST OF FENCELINE AND
—i
LU
V EAST OF SURVEY SIGN
1
w
I
SOO*22"00"
LL.
82.16"
1" EAST OF FENCELJNE AND
1' FAST ®F SURVEY SIGN
LEGEND
SET 1" MAG SPIKE
FOUND 1-5/16" DIAMETER IRON
PIPE WITH CAP
Ivs
(R.A.)
FOUND 1" DIAMETER IRON PIPE
RECORDED DIMENSION
sc
i
COF�y, m
Computer fie norne: Disk 1, S-022818 Derived from:
Latitude of the mark — DDMMSS North:
Elevation
(height
of the mork):
FEET
Longitude of the mark — DDMMSS West:
(1 METER = 3.2808333 FEET)
METERS
St. Croix County Grid WHPGN:
Northing: (FEET)
Northing:
(METERS)
Easting:
Easting:
State Plane Coordinates:
Northing! (FEET)
Northing:
(METERS)
Easting:
Easting:
TOWN OF KINNICKINNIC
ALUMINUM MONUMENT FOUND (9/3/96)
"SURVEY MARK' NAIL SET (3/24/98)
is 1 " IRON PIPE FOUND
s
1 1 1
___.�.......__.;.
0
O PLASTICAP IN 1"X30" IRON PIPE
1 1
i 1
in
WEIGHING 1.68 LBS./FT., SET
v
T2
SIGN-
co
rn
N
N
--- Sl GN
aRAPEac SCALE
o 1p 30
Ile)
d:
cn
(IN Fm l
C.T.H. "N"
CA
o
Ln
U
c
v
L
r
La
SIGN
SIGN
J.S. PUBLIC LAND SURVEY MONUMENT RECORD
Computer file name: Disk #1, S-022818
Latitude of the mark — DDMMSS North:
Longitude of the mark — DDMMSS West:
St. Croix County Grid MPGN:
Northing: (FEET)
Easting:
Stote Plane Coordinates:
Northing: (FEET)
Easting:
Derlyed from:
Elevation (height of the mark):
(1 METER - 3.2808333 FEET)
Northing:
Easting: -
(METERS)
Northing: (METERS)
Easting:
TOWN OF KINNICKJNNIC
IRMTHEIM
FEET
METERS
U.S. PUBLIC LAND SURVEY MONUMENT RECORD
Computer file name: Disk 1, S— 022818 Derived from: -
Latitude of the mark — DDMMSS North: Elevation (height of the mark):
Longitude of the mark — DDMMSS West: (I METER = 3.280,5333 FEET)
St. Croix County Grid WHPGH:
Northing: (ITN Northin g: (METERS)
Easting: Easting:
State Plane Coordinates:
Northing: • Northin
(FEET} 9� (METERS)
Easting: Easting:
TOWN OF KINNICKINNIC
ALUMINUM MONUMENT FOUND (9/3/96)
"SURVEY MARK„ NAIL SET (3/24/98)
1 " IRON PIPE FOUND
O PLASTICAP IN 1"X30" IRON PIPE
WEIGHING 1.68 LBS./FT., SET
SIGN —
co
rn
N
GRAPHIC SCALE r�
ca
LO
SIGN
SIGN
-- SIGN
K)
X
5
z
T28N,R18W
FEET
METERS
(d) Describe any record evidence, occupational evidence, testimonial evidence or any other material evidence
you considered, and whether the monument was found or placed.
Records included the township tie sheet. The monument was on center line and
fence line to the north and south. The monument was in jeopardy due to a
proposed road and culvert reconstruction project.
(a) Describe any material discrepancy between the location of the corner as restored or reestablished
and the location of that corner as previously restored or reestablished by distance and direction.
Show the discrepancy on the plan view drawing under (d), above. Show the distances between the
corner as previously restored or reestablished and (1) the corner as restored or reestablished, and
(2) to at least 2 of the wltness monuments shown on the drawing in- (d), above.
To my knowledge there is no discrepancy. The monument was found, along with
one of the original witness irons. No additional measuring was done to verify
proximity to adjacent PLSS corners, but the monument appeared to be undisturbed.
After reconstruction a Berntsen "SURVEY MARK" nail was set using witness irons
previously set from monument.
(f) Was the corner restored through acceptance of (1) an obliterated evidence location, or, (2) a found
perpetuated location?
(2) A found perpetuated location. f
(gfm) Was the comer reestablished through lost corner proportionate methods? If so, show the method,
including the directions and distances to other public land -survey corners used as evidence or used
for proportioning in determining the corner location?
No.
Affix Land Surveyor Seal
i I
I I
I 1
I 1
1 I
I !
I !
1 I
1 I
I !
I I
1 I
(t} I, James E. Rusch St. Croix County Surveyor,f
(type or print name) certify that the corner location shown i I
on this record was determined by me or under my direction and i !
control and that this U.S. Public Land Survey Monument Record is i I
correct and complete to the best of my knowledge and ballet `"--------------------J
41olFgu
SIgnature Date
U.S. PUBLIC LAND SURVEY MONUMENT RECORD
Computer file name: Disk #1, S-022818
Latitude of the mark -- DDMMSS North:
Longitude of the mark -- DDMMSS West:
St. Croix County Grid WHPGN:
Northing:
(FEET)
Easting:
State Plane Coordinates:
Northing: (FEET)
Easting:
ALUMINUM MONUMENT FOUND
1" IRON PIPE FOUND
O PLASTICAP IN 1 "X30" IRON PIPE
WEIGHING 1.68 LBS./FT., SET
N
GR"MC SCuE
a zs ;
IN FM
Derived from:
Elevation (height of the mark):
(1 METER = 3.2808333 FEET)
Northing:
Easting: _
(METERS)
Northing:
(METERS)
Easting:
TOWN OF KINNICKINNIC
i
www�ww..wrw.Mwwww�w ww
i i I
1
wrrr'..�wi ww+ www�..www
i i
i 1
www�w^wwT wwww r---
z
T9RN R1 RW
FEET
M ETERS
(d) Describe any record evidence. occupational evidence, testimonial evidence or any other material evidence
you considered, and whether the monument was found or pieced.
Records included the township tie sheet. The monument was on center line and
fence line to the north and south. The monument was in jeopardy due to a
proposed road and culvert reconstruction project.
(e) Describe any material discrepancy between the location of the comer as restored or reestablished
and the location of that comer as previously restored or reestablished by distance and direction.
Show the discrepancy on the plan view drawing under (d), above. Show the distances between the
comer as previously restored or reestablished and (1) the corner as restored or reestablished, and
(2) to at least 2 of the witness monuments shown on the drawing in (d). above.
To my knowledge there is no discrepancy. The monument was found, along with
one of the original witness irons. No additional measuring was done to verify
proximity to adjacent PLSS corners, but the monument appeared to be undisturbed.
(f) Was the corner restored through acceptance of (1) an obliterated evidence location, or, (2) a found
perpetuated location?
(2) A found perpetuated location.
(gam) Was the comer reestablished through lost comer proportionate methods? If so, show the method,
Including the directions and distances to other public land survey corners used as evidence or used
for proportioning In determining the comer location?
No.
--------------------
Affix Land Surveyor Seal
I I
_ JAMS,
1 RUISCRI &41
1 3 Hudson
(l) I, James E. Rusch St. Croix County Surveyor i 7 W13
(type or print name) certify that the comer location shown
on this record was determined by me or under my direction and
control and that this U.S. Public Land Survey Monument Record Is I
correct and complete to the best of my knowledge and belief.--'"'---
-a4vlA
nature Data