The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About3015019U.S. Public Land Survey Monument Record Dunn County, Wisconsin Instructions: This record shall show the location of the corner and shall include all of the following nine elements (a through i), (a) Identify the corner by reference to the United States public land survey system, Corner Common to Sections 1, 6, 7, and 12, Township 30 North, Ranges 14 and 15 West Type of Monument: Found a 3Y4" diameter aluminum cap in concrete. Location indicated on sketch - e 0 M 11 M wffl� � (D C� -A 112- (e) Describe any material discrepancy between the location of the corner as restored or reestablished and the location of that corner as previously restored or reestablished by distance and direction. Show the discrepancy on the PIUD view drawing under (d). Show the distances between the corner as previously restored or reestablished and (1) the corner as restored or reestablished, and (2) to at least two of the witness monuments shown On the drawing in (d). No discrepancy (1) Was the corner restored through acceptance of (I) an obliterated evidence location, or, (2) a found perpetuated location`? (2) a found perpetuated location (g-h) Was the corner reestablished through lost corner proportionate methods? If so, show the method including the directions and distances to other public land survey corners used as evidence or used for proportioning in determining the corner location. M (c-d) In the plan view drawing below, provide reference ties to at least four witness monuments, (Winless monuments shall be made of concrete, natural stone, iron, or other equally durable material.) Describe witness monuments. Show a plan view drawing depicting the relevant monuments and reference ties which is Sufficient in detail to enable accurate relocation of the corner monument if the corner monument is disturbed. Indicate north. Partly down fence C: (typical) CO 'X <11) -S z 00 E 2Cn CO _0 Dunn County a)C: 0) �u (D CO au'2 m 3 northerly of a CO 0 I (n 15" Sugar maple (n 0 1 foot southerly 0) 8 C: in a fence .a -;5 C of a 6" crab apple M :3 M ' N86'24'32W W o .0 (n 11', Q _S86'12'23"E 39.83 30,6o - ---------- X X CO N21t A survey marker sign was found 1 foot northerly of the monument. co St. Croix County CO J + Found a 1%" outside diameter iron pipe, 0 10 20 0 Found a 11/4" outside diameter iron pipe with a plastic cap. I ME= ME= I Field book 47, page 32ff Scale: 1 "=20' FSheet 1 of 2 2301501 0000 (b)Describe ,my record evidence, monument evidence, occupational evidence, testimonial evidencemany other material evidence you considered, and whether the monument was found or placed. CORNER HISTORY December 11.1x4V (General Land Office field notes, James E.Freeman) Set post. -White oak 14^Se3'VV, as links -Sugar 10^w44'm(slinks -White oak 1S^mc's.03links Date unknown (County Surveyor's Record 2.page 419)Found the stump nfewhite oak w2 E.03linke. Found the stump ofawhite oak S8r'Vv 35 links. The corner is misidentified as the corner common to sections 7, 12, 18, and 24. october1O. 190 (Map ofsurvey filed ioSt. Croix County, John Mc|una) Subdivided section 1.measuring tothis section corner. September oa.19ru (Map ofsurvey filed inSt. Croix County, Arthur L. VVegerer) The map does not show the corner, but its location would have been needed toperform the survey. Date unknown (Map of survey filed in St. Croix County, Bradley J. Bohlen) A bearing and a distance to the corner are shown, but a monument is not described. November 11.1933 (G-2Gu.James E. Rusch) Bearings and distances to the corner are shown, but a monument is not described. November 1S.1993 (Tie sheet 2S015U1000D.James ERuonh) Found a1l4"iron pipe. A2^x3Tiron pipe with onaluminum cap was placed. -Plastic plug inarxmriron pipe placed northerly, 2015feeL -Plastic plug inmrx30"iron pipe placed easterly, J0.54feet. -Plastic plug inmrxau^iron pipe placed southerly, 34.o8feet. -Plastic plug in a 1 " x 30" iron pipe placed westerly, 39.79 feet. June ar.2DOJ (St.Croix County Certified Survey Map 4mo4 Bradley J.Bohlen) Found aSt. Croix County aluminum monument. September 2u.2ono (L-80.Joel A.Brandt) Found mnaluminum cap. November R.2010 (Map ofsurvey filed inSt. Croix County, Joel A.Brandt) Found analuminum cap. EXPLANATION In November ofzVz3. the Dunn County Surveyor's Office found a aY4^ diameter aluminum cap (marked St. Croix County) in concrete and four ties according to nuod»'s 1993 tie sheet. The monument was found at the intersection of fences, but no fence corner post was found. The original government bearing trees were searched for, but not found. A magnetic locator was used to search the area around the aluminum uap, but no further evidence of the corner was found. The aluminum cap fell approximately 5 feet short of the distance from the east quarter corner of section 1 reported in the original government survey. The aluminum cap fell approximately 5 feet short ofthe distance from the east quarter corner ofsection 12 reported in the original government survey. Because the aluminum map in concrete fell a8afence inters*ctinn, and because the distances from the adjacent quarter corners compared well with the distances reported in the original gmmmmon( ourvey, the aluminum cap in concrete was accepted asthe best evidence vfthe corner's location. N 1, Gregg D. Batzer under the authority of the Dunn County Surveyor's Office, certify that the corner location shown oothis record was determined hrmcmunder mrdirection and control and that this United States Public | Monument Record iocorrect and complete tothe best ofmrknowledge and belief Signature U. S. PUBLIC LAND SURVEY i N S T R U C T 1 0 N S (a) Identify the corner by reference to the U.S. public land survey system. 0 = Corner monunient restored. 2_3015010000 MO N U M-E,NT, RECORD This record shall show the location of the corner and shall include all of the following nine elements (a through i). Wed] b ) Describe any record evidence, monument evidence, occupational evidence, testimonial eviderfce or any other material evidence you considered, and whether the monument was found or placed. A 1901 survey by John McClure does not give distances North or West from the above cor- ner to nearest controlling corners. A survey from C. Grubb indicated a I" iron pipe set at the S1/4 Corner of Section 1 and a pipe set at the SE Corner of Section 1. 1 believe we have found them both. The original Government survey of the Town Line by James E. Freeman in 1849 indicates40 chains in each 1/2 mile. The subdivision of the township by John Ryan in 1853 indicates 39.85 chains from SE Corner to S 1/4 Corner of Section 1. We measure ±2599.3 to the west, ±2635.6' to the north, and ±2634.6' to the south from this corner. Occupation at the corner dates to before the turn of tRh the century. Occupation at the S1/16 is shown before 1900, but by 1930 title runs across the 1/16 line. We did not attempt to look for the occupation since it appears to be of less value and more remote than the 14" iron pipe found. (c) In the plan view drawing below, provide reference ties to at least 4 witness monuments, or, if the location Is within a Min ic ipa I i ty, to at least 2 witness monuments. (Witness monuments shall be made' of concrete, natural stone, iron or other equally durable material.) Describe witness monuments. d ) Show a plan view drawing depicting the relevant monuments and reference ties which is sufficient in detail to enable accurate relocation or the corner monument if the corner monument is disturbed. Indicate north. Aluminum cap cemented on a 2" X 30" iron pipe weighing 3.65#/ft., placed 2_30 15010000 e ) Dc.,;c r i 5c any material d i SCrepincy between the loca t ion or the corner as restored or reestablished and the location of that corner as previously restored or reestabl i Fhed by distance and direction. Show the discrepancy on the plan view drawing Linder (d), above. Show the distances between the corner as previously restored or reestabl i shed no (1) the corner as restored or reestablished, and (2) to at least 2 or the witness monuments shown on the drawing in (d), above. The McClure and Grubb surveys did not indicate ties for the above corner. McClure did not give distances although he did indicate that he ren part of the South line of Section 1. The only discrepancy in distances is with the original Government survey. See the reverse for dimensions. The grandson of an old-time resident had a residence in Section 12. He did not know of any monumentation in the area, including what we found. f ) Was the corner restored through acceptance of (1) an obliterated evidence location, or, (2) found perpetuated location? I believe it is a found perpetuated location, although I cannot swear to the 14" iron pipe which we found. (9&h) Was the corner reestablished through lost corner proportionate methods? If so, show the method, Including the directions and distances to other public land survey Corners used as evidence or used for proportioning in determining the corner location? NA