HomeMy WebLinkAboutFinance 04-10-03
ST. CROIX COUNTY
NOTICE OF COMMITTEE MEETING
TO: Chairman Buck Malick
St. Croix County Board
FROM: Ralph Swenson, Chair
COMMITTEE TITLE: Finance
DATE: Thursday, April 10, 2003 8:30 A.M.
LOCATION: Room 1281, Government Center, Hudson
CALL TO ORDER
ROLL CALL
ADOPTION OF AGENDA
DATE OF NEXT MEETING: May 8, 2003 8:30 A.M.
ACTION ON PREVIOUS MINUTES: March 13, 2003
UNFINISHED BUSINESS:
NEW BUSINESS:
1. Review of Vouchers
2. Maintenance Department Report
3. Computer Services Department Report
4. Risk Management Report
5. Corporation Counsel Report
6. Treasurer's Report
a. New Computer Request
7. County Clerk Report
8. Review of Courts' Committee Assignment Options
9. Finance Department Report
a. Review of Position Vacancy Status
10. Administrative Coordinator Report
a. County Funds Investment Policies
b. Follow-up on Job Descriptions and Administrative Coordinator Responsibilities
c. Huber Project Proforma
d. Review of Verbeicher Project Status
e. Review of County Unfunded Wisconsin Retirement System Liability - Springsted
f. Review of Borrowing Options and Issuance Fees - Springsted
g. Update on State Budget
11. Fair Board line item transfer for fund raising planning
CORRESPONDENCE: WCA Memorandum re: 2003-05 State Budget Biennial Budget Analysis
ADJOURNMENT (Agenda not necessarily presented in this order)
COPIES TO: County Board Office News Media/Notice Board
County Clerk County Board
County Departments
**ADDITIONS/CHANGES/CORRECTIONS
Last Updated. 41312003-3:26 PM
FINANCE MEETING
Regular Meeting April 10, 2003
Meeting called to order by Chair Swenson at 8:30 a.m. Present: Ralph Swenson, Stan Krueger,
Clarence Malick, Esther Wentz and Daryl Standafer. Staff present: Administrative Coordinator
Chuck Whiting, County Treasurer Cheryl Slind, County Clerk Cindy Campbell. Others present:
Judy Wiff, media.
Motion by Krueger, 2nd by Standafer to adopt the agenda. Carried. Motion by Wentz, 2nd by
Krueger to approve the minutes of March 13, 2003 with the following changes: Page 1,
paragraph 2, add "Carried" after first motion. Page 6, paragraph 13 change guaranty to
guarantee in item 3.; Page 6, paragraph 14 delete "This matter was tabled." Add "No action
taken on this matter." Carried.
1. Vouchers. April vouchers were reviewed by Wentz on April 15th. Motion to approve
by Wentz, 2nd by Malick. Carried. Krueger will review vouchers next month on May 9t . Bills
will be paid on the 9th subject to approval by Krueger's review then formal approval will be done
by the Finance Committee at its June meeting.
2. Maintenance Department Report. David Best, Service Technician, reported on behalf of
the Maintenance Department. Best handed out a Maintenance Personnel Request (2004) which
indicated the new Huber addition will require an additional two hours a day to a custodian and
from one to two hours a day to a maintenance mechanic. Malick suggested the Maintenance
Department look into outside contracting for yard work and possibly other services. Swenson
thanked the Maintenance Department for bringing this forward at an early date so this can be
factored into the Huber plans.
3. Computer Services Department Report. Whiting indicated they are still working on
purchasing IDI components for SAGE. Malick noted Public Protection had discussed concerns
about the Visions program. LaCrosse County is not moving as rapidly as hoped to create
something that is satisfactory to LaCrosse County. St. Croix County is not moving aggressively
to make Visions work in the Sheriff's Department. Krueger recommends the Sheriff review this
matter when he puts his budget together.
4. Risk Management Report. No report. Whiting indicated Risk Manager Dawn Budrow,
Corporation Counsel Greg Timmerman and himself will be attending the annual WMMIC
meeting May 1 st and 2nd
5. Corporation Counsel Report. No report.
6. Treasurer's Report. County Treasurer Cheryl Slind reported tax deed searches have
been completed. 2000 delinquent taxes are being advertised this week and next. Treasurer's
reconciliation is being completed. Receipt processing will be put online on May l't. SAGE will
be put on all computers in her office.
Finance Committee
April 10, 2003
Page 2 of 8
Slind requested funds for a new computer. Her request is $622.00. Malick suggested to
handle the same as other requests and look for offsetting savings and not tap into the
Contingency Fund just yet. Her existing computer will be used elsewhere in her office. Motion
by Standafer, 2nd Krueger to go ahead with the purchase of a new computer but it will not be
formally funded by the Contingency Fund and if it cannot be funded with other line items under
spent per budget the committee will deal with it in September. Carried unanimously.
Malick announced a new business item to be possibly discussed at the May Finance
meeting. Public Protection brought up the possibility of locating an ATM machine in the
Government Center. By locating an ATM machine here, it could be productive, by improving
the collection of delinquent fines by people who do not have checking accounts, but do have a
credit and/or debit card. Options include renting, renting with option to buy or buying an ATM
outright. Standafer suggested the County not get involved in operating an ATM machine. He
recommends hiring a company to do this.
7. County Clerk Report. County Clerk Cindy Campbell reported the April 1, 2003
election went well. The village of North Hudson had a high turnout and it was necessary to print
additional ballots in the Clerk's office the day of the election. The County Clerk's staff indicated
title transfers have increased from an average of 10-12 per day to 15-20 per day. There are more
out-of-state title transfers being done. Campbell indicated she is in the process of getting the
Official Directory information gathered and assembling the County Board Proceedings book. It
was the consensus of the Finance Committee to discontinue preparing County Board Proceeding
books. Minutes, resolutions and ordinances are available in the County Clerk's office if
requested.
Malick presented a new business matter with respect to annual dog vaccinations to
prevent rabies, distemper and other life-threatening diseases. He indicated a veterinarian at the
UW-Madison has determined that it's probably not good for dogs to get rabies shots every year
or two years. When paying property taxes it comes through the cities, villages and towns that
dog owners need to re-license their dogs and provide a rabies certificate. Malick asked the
committee for their permission to work with Corporation Counsel Timmerman and Campbell on
requirements from the State statutes or county ordinance. Can we lessen the burden for our
citizens by changing the requirement to every three years to maintain public safety.
8. Review of Courts' Committee Assignment Options. Supr. Speer, Judge Lundell,
Judge Vlack and Judge Needham were in attendance. Malick indicated the Finance Committee
has discussed the option of changing committee assignments to the Public Protection Committee
to oversee the judicial function as well as the Clerk of Courts rather than have Finance
Committee do this function. Reasons being for better coordination of like-topics of related and
similar services and secondly, space allocations coordination would be better. Judge Lundell
pointed out why the Judges felt this was a conflict of interest. Judge Lundell passed around
Public Protection minutes of August 7, 2002 referring to a deferred prosecution agreement. The
Judges disagree with the agreement and want to avoid implied or indirect pressure from Public
Protection. Judge Needham indicated the District Attorney's office and Sheriff's Department are
part of the executive branch of government. The judicial branch is a third and independent
Finance Committee
April 10, 2003
Page 3 of 8
branch of government; separate from the executive and legislative. Judges have to independently
look at topics. Judge Vlack noted they had attended meetings regarding means of collections and
policy setting for collections. He indicated the Judges cannot get involved with that. Judges
have to separate themselves from this.
Supr. Speer indicated the Judges would not be in competition with other departmens as
far as budgets are concerned. Public Protection deals with seven separate budgets.
Swenson asked if the Judges had any reaction of Clerk of Courts being moved to Public
Protection. Judge Needham indicated they are an extension of the judicial branch. Request for
input on policies could cause problems.
Vlack requested an organizational chart indicating who reports to whom. Whiting noted
this issue of coordination came up when the space issue between the Clerk of Court and District
Attorney was being discussed and room across the hall was considered.
Standafer noted on Needham's comments regarding budgets and allocation of resources
and three branches of government. We are reporting relationships countywide. Standafer felt it
makes sense to try it. Lundell asked where it is more efficient. Judge Lundell noted they have
ongoing disputes with the Sheriff's Department and District Attorney's office about varying
degrees of priorities.
Swenson asked where committee would like to go from here. If change committee
assignments both committees have to be involved. Speer indicated Public Protection has no
objections either way. Malick noted changes to committee assignment also changes rules and
bylaws.
Motion by Malick, 2nd by Standafer to recommend to County Board the changing of
assignments so that the Clerk of Courts and Judges will the responsibility of the Public
Protection rather than the Finance Committee. Wentz feels uncomfortable with this change
because it appears the Judges are comfortable with reporting to Finance. It has not been proved
that efficiency would improve with the change. Krueger agrees with points made by Judges.
Motion defeated 3 - 2.
Motion by Malick, 2nd by Standafer to move only the Clerk of Court to Public Protection.
Standafer noted he's uncomfortable with making policy decisions on an objective basis and has
some uncertainty with the rightness of the main motion on the floor with denying the move of
the reporting relationship to Public Protection. The Judges articulated that in their view they
should remain together (Judges and Clerk of Court). If the majority of this committee is
deferring to their collective argument then we will not hear all of that argument and leave the
status quo in place. Malick and Standafer withdraw the motion.
Finance Committee
April 10, 2003
Page 4 of 8
9. Finance Department Report.
a. Review of Position Vacancy Status. Motion by Malick, 2nd by Wentz to ratify the
selection of Michelle Pietrick as Finance Director. Whiting indicated Pietrick's background
includes a Bachelor of Science degree in accounting from St. Cloud State University, a Masters
Degree in Public Administration from Hamlin, employed at the Minneapolis Community
Development Agency since 1994, prior to that work at the Minnesota State Auditor's office.
She is a CPA. She will begin her employment on April 28, 2003. Roll call to ratify the
selection: Yes: Malick, Wentz, Swenson, Krueger, Standafer. Carried unanimously.
10. Administrative Coordinator Report.
a. County Funds Investment Policies. Whiting presented a revised draft of the
County Investment Policy. Committee members will review it for the next meeting. This item is
to be placed on May's agenda for approval. Standafer indicated he thought it was still too long.
b. Follow-up on Job Descriptions and Administrative Coordinator Responsibilities.
Whiting presented a proposed ordinance regarding supervisory responsibilities of the
Administrative Coordinator Position. Discussion why this is an ordinance rather than a
resolution. Corporation Counsel indicated this is changing the management structure of the
County. The County Board needs to approve changes to the management structure that it has
created. Timmerman indicated an ordinance creates a more permanent record - form over
substance. Malick suggested making it a resolution. Timmerman indicated the proposed
ordinance needs additional language including statutes and an explanation as why it is being
done. Revisions need to go through Administration Committee. Standafer discussed this issue
with the Administration Committee and they indicated the document should come from the
Finance Committee. Swenson, Malick and Whiting will revise the proposed ordinance and bring
it back to the Finance Committee in May.
C. Huber Project Proforma. Whiting revised the proforma pursuant to the
suggestions made at the March Finance Committee meeting. Whiting indicated this proforma is
still a draft. He worked off the last two audit reports and attempted to understand how the Jail
Assessment Fund cash flowed. The Jail Assessment Fund is paying back the General Fund for
$310,000 used for partitions back in 1998 and 1999 at essentially $50,000 per year. What
Whiting discovered in reviewing the audit reports, when moneys are coming in, they do not
show up-as revenue in-the Jail Assessment Fund. They immediately go into the General Fund.
This essentially means, from a cash flow standpoint, there is about $50,000 more a year coming
into the Jail Assessment Fund. Whiting still needs to estimate future revenues. He added
$49,525 of revenue to the General Fund to repay the debt on the partitions. In 2002 the Jail
Assessment Fund paid $82,000. Whiting has estimated the revenue to be $175,000, but the
revenue depends on how many tickets are being written.
Standafer noted he is concerned about the operating costs of the Huber facility. Swenson
noted it was important to realize the Jail Assessment Fund is solely for capital items attached to
Finance Committee
April 10, 2003
Page 5 of 8
the real estate. Malick asked for help from Public Protection showing the Capital Outlay Plan
for future years. Swenson noted the proforma is based on the worse case scenario and asked if
there would be merit to run something higher? Malick requested the new Finance Director
work on this and improve estimating on $175,000 and maintenance costs.
Swenson asked if we would need a resolution prepared for the May 8th meeting defining
the Huber borrowing. Whiting indicated the May 8th meeting is a joint meeting with Public
Protection to reach a consensus between the two committees on how to use the Jail Assessment
Fund for debt retirement. Swenson noted the committee had to think about what extent the
County wants to formalize, if at all, the amount of funding to come out of the Jail Assessment
Fund if we underwrite the debt service on the loan.
Swenson thanked Whiting and Mary Martell for work done on preparing the proforma.
d. Review of Verbeicher Project Status. Whiting reported Dave Fodroczi will report
on the Verbeicher report to the County Board on April 15, 2003. The report is complete and the
Verbeicher charged $2,600. There are scenarios presented in the report that will allow the
County Board to understand what constraints and opportunities the County Farm property
presents. What does the County want to do next and how will the County go about doing this?
Malick suggested we get feedback from County Board members. Wentz indicated the year 2006
has come up in many meetings because the DOT has indicated its need for some property for the
Highway 64 project. Malick said the time is right with the highway development and the growth
of New Richmond with respect to infrastructure needs. Malick felt we should do nothing with
the excess County owned land in Hudson until we show we can deal with the New Richmond
site. Standafer asked what is planned for county owned property. Swenson suggested the
County look at the other options rather than just selling the land. The report to the County Board
will be an informational update.
e. Review of County Unfunded Wisconsin Retirement System Liability - Springsted
Incorporated. Mike Hoheisel of Springsted Incorporated referred to Page 7 of his handout
providing Summary of Unfunded Accrued Actuarial Liability (UAAL). The estimated payments
the County sends to the Wisconsin Retirement System (WRS) for its unfunded liability are
shown in column 3 and total $9,540,799 through 2024. In 1980 WRS combined its two best
retirement packages. In 1988 WRS discovered the benefits they were going to pay do not equal
the money they are getting in based on what is collected from the employees. In 1988 WRS
went to every municipality which was a member of WRS and amortized that difference over
forty years. WRS assessed a liability onto each local unit of government. We are currently at a
rate of 8% (state mandate percentage-fixed rate). To take it over the County would sell a tax-
exempt note for that payment and use the dollars to payoff the WRS liability and change it over
to a promissory note for ten years. Hoheisel indicated the County is not exempt from future
liability if WRS does a new actual analysis. This is a taxable transaction and fiduciary
responsibility, but can the County continue to let this liability grow? Column 4 of the analysis
shows the principal and interest it would take if the County wanted a level debt payment for ten
years in the amount of approximately $540,000 per year for the next ten years. The savings is in
the long-term. Estimated present value savings would be $1,327,957. Swenson confirmed the
Finance Committee
April 10, 2003
Page 6 of 8
employees will not see a change in the level of benefits from WRS and that this is only a
financial decision. This refinance moves it to debt service levy not an operating levy.
f. Review of Borrowing Options and Issuance Fees - Springsted Incorporated.
Hoheisel provided a handout showing St. Croix County Sources of Funds and Uses of Funds.
Based on the proforma provided to Springsted by Whiting, Springsted estimated the Huber
Facility Expansion in the amount of $1,135,000; Communications Systems at $1,230,000 and
Park Buildings at $40,000. The Huber Facility Expansion and Communications Systems
amounts are based on utilizing $735,000 from the Building Fund. There has been no decision at
this time on whether the $735,000 will be used. Without the use of the $735,000, the amounts
would be $1.5 for the Huber Facility Expansion and $1.6 for the Communications System.
These are construction costs, not operational costs. Second series of bonds would be refinancing
the Government Center building in the amount of $6,775,000. Costs of Issuance totaling
$60,000 are costs involving attorneys' fees, agency fees, registrar fees, OS printing fees and
Springsted fees.
Debt Service Schedule - (Page 2 of handout). Rate is currently at 3.05%. Springsted compares
when bonds are bid on a basis of a true interest cost, which is interest, plus the discount brought
back in terms of today's dollars. Part of this bond issue was refinanced once to lower the rate.
This is a current refunding, similar to a homeowner refinancing their house. In an advanced
refunding, money is set aside in an escrow account to refinance debt. The procedure for this
refinancing is money set aside to sell the bonds, call the old bonds in and the old bonds no longer
exist. Hoheisel indicated this is the cleanest and most efficient type of refinancing and most cost
efficient for the County. According to tax code, an issue can only be advanced once. Current
refund can be done as many times as we want, as long as it makes financial sense to do. The
County will have to sell $6,775,000 worth of bonds to refinance outstanding debt. This can be
done 90 days before the bonds first become "callable" in October.
Prior Original Debt Service (Page 6 of handout) shows the existing debt. From October 1, 2004
to October 1, 2009 the rate increases from 4.750% to 5.125%. The average coupon will go from
5.03% to 2.57%.
Debt Service Comparison (Page 5 of handout) shows future dollar savings in the amount of
$464,000 during the next six years.
Debt Service Schedule (Page 9 of handout) provides coupon rates of 2.4% to 5.1%. This is all
competitive bids; Springsted does not negotiate. This is sent on the national market to over four
hundred underwriters. True Interest Cost is 4.6%. This is a taxable transaction; therefore the
rates are different from the refunding bonds. Goal date is approximately the second week in
June.
Summary of Unfunded Accrued Actuarial Liability (UAAL) Analysis (Page 10 of handout).
This is a scenario at a rate of 4.5% with cash payment of $1.7 million. If the County maintains
its stream of payments the County would need to contribute $1.7 by July to keep the same
Finance Committee
April 10, 2003
Page 7 of 8
payments. The present value savings here is $1,322,000, which indicates there is not much
difference using cash, then putting it out.
Hoheisel noted page 11 provides a fee schedule for each type of transaction. Springsted fee
schedule based on Issue Size for Wisconsin Clients. Springsted fee for 0 to 1,000,000 is
$7,5000; 1,000,001 to 5,000,000 is $7,500 + $2/1,000 above $1,000,000; 5,000,001 plus is
$15,500 + $1/1,000 above $5,000,000. Based on this schedule, Springsted's fees, for each of the
issues, totals $41,855. Hoheisel noted the independent consultants will charge similar fees.
Competitors are more than likely underwriters and will negotiate their fees. The current discount
Springsted is offering is $11.00 a bond for the Promissory Notes, $11.00 a bond for Refunding
Bonds, and $9.00 per bond for the Taxable Promissory Notes. Hoheisel indicated if the market
were to move ten basis points the Total Interest Costs would be 3.5% for the Promissory Notes,
2.960% for Refunding Bonds, and 4.7% for Taxable Promissory Notes. If the market moves up
or down ten basis points, the County could expect to pay $15,000 more or less.
Whiting reported he had emailed administrators around the state on other investors used. Ehlers
is comparable to Springsted.
Hoheisel expects the decision be made by the May 8th Finance Committee meeting with the full
County Board taking action at its May 20th meeting. Springsted will provide a set of schedules
to the County Board, called a Recommendation Packet, which lays out the terms of each
transaction. If approved by resolution, the debt would be sold on June 16th at 1:00 p.m. then take
action to award the sale on June 17th. The County would get the money after July 1St for the
three projects. Bids for Huber Building will be in on May 6th then will be opened at the May 8th
meeting.
Swenson asked if it would be possible to get a one page summary of two different scenarios; one
using the $735,000 to buy it down and one without. Then also compare what would be the
difference in the levy requirements, less the savings from General Obligations Bonds for the
Government Center and include the operational savings. This would be used as a handout to the
County Board members.
Hoheisel stated cash is best and obviously the County would want to enter the market at a low
point in time. The County needs to examine if it wants to use cash. He also indicated the rates
reviewed today are lower than the trust fund. Standafer suggests keeping the $735,000 based on
today's market conditions.
Wentz suggested having an explanation prepared with respect to the WRS issue.
Nick from Springsted will attend May 8th meeting. Hoheisel indicated he would provide the
requested options to Whiting within two weeks and to provide Hoheisel with feedback on the
information he provides.
g. Update on State Budget. Whiting has noticed apparent change in the Doyle
administration regarding the application for IGT funds at the state.
Finance Committee
April 10, 2003
Page 8 of 8
11. Fair Board line item transfer for fund raising planning. No action.
Correspondence: WCA Memorandum re: 2003-05 State Budget Biennial Budget Analysis
Adjournment. Wentz, 2„d Krueger to adjourn 12:23 p.m.
Esther Wentz, Secretary