The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About008-1096-10-000 (3)` minsin Department otCommerce OR11 R htND SITE EVALUATION Page I _of 3 e-Division of Safety and Buildings m actor th Comm 83,05, Wis. Adm. + Code •� � t7„ a 1.! 51 Certified Soil Testing Attach complete site plan on paper not less than 8'/2 x 11 inches in size. Plan must County _ include, but not limited to: vertical and horizontal reference point (BM), direction and St. Croix percent slope, scale or dimensions, north arrow, and location and distance to nearest road. -- - Parcel 1.0 -1096-40(34.28.16.513) APPLICANT INFORMATION - Please print all information. --- Personal information you provide may be used for secondary purposes (Privacy Law, s. 15.04 (1) (m)). ReviewedDate Property Owner Property Location Govt, Lot NE 114 SW 1 S 34 T 28 N,R 16 W — . - — Property Owner's Mailing Address Lot # Block # StiK N a or CSM# 2337 Rose Lane Cit State Zi Code PhoneNumber City Villa a ZTown Nearest Road V►�oodville W1 54p028 715-684-4676 7 au Gale CTHW BB New Construction Use: ® Residential / Number of bedrooms 3 Addition to existing building Replacement Public or commercial describe Code Derived daily flow 450 gpd Recommended design loading rate .5 bed, gpolft2 .6 trench, gpolft2 Absorption area required 900 bed, ft2 750 trench, ft' Maximum design loading rate •5 bed, gpolft2 .6 trench, gpolft2 Recommended infiltrator surface elevabon(s) 102.0 ft (as referred to site p!an benchmar Additional design !site Considerations install 3br replacement mound: 4' x 95' rock bed on 100.0 contour as upslope edge of rock w/ 2' sand rill Parent material loess over till n Flood plain elevation, if applicable NA ft S=Suitable for system I Conventional Mound In -Ground Pressure AT -Grade System in Fill Holding Tank U=Unsuitable for system ' _ X U M S U L S® U :�] S Z U L S a — S :. J Boring# Horizon Depth in Dominant Color Munsell Mottles Ou, SZ. Cont. Color Texture Structure Gr. Sz. Sh. Consistence Boundary Roots _--GPD?ft2 Fed Trench 1 Ground elev 100.0 ft 1 0-3 7.5YR 4/2 2 3-7 7.5YR4/2 3 7-13 7.5YR 4/4 - - - sit Sill sl 2 m gr 2 f-m sbk 2 m sbk mvfr mvfr mvfr cs cs cs 2f1m .5 .5 .5 3 .6 .6 .6 4 Im If 4 13-30 5YR 4/4 f2d 7.5YR 6/2 sl 0 m mfi - Depth to limiting factor �- 13' Re rks: suitable for replacement site only; priv permit required to commence construction — Z 1 0-3 ! 7.5YR 4/2 - sil 2 rn gr mvfr cs 2flm .5 .6 "_N 2 3-6 7.5YR 4/3 - sill 2 m sbk mvfr gs if .5 .6 Ground elev- 3 6-15 7.5YR 4/4 - sl 2 m sbk mvfr cs 11 .5 .6 95.5 ft 4 15-28 7.5YR 4/4 fl f 7.5YR 5/8 sl 1 m sbk mvfr - j - .4 .5 Depth to limiting factor ,. Remarks: mom,rig oecomes csp CST Name (Please Print) Signature: Telephone No. Henry F. Grote 715-665-2.681 Address Certified or estmg Datte CST Number Ref # P.O. Box 57, Knapp, WI 54749 11/13/1999 222774 1259 PROPERTY OWNER: Rode, Doug & Peggy SOIL DESCRIPTION REPORT F—T753F- - Page • 2 _ of 1 Certified Sol:,fis 1 PARCEL Lp.# 0_08-109"1 (34.28.16 s 13) Horizon Depth Dominant Color Mottles Texture Structure Consistence Boundary Roots _ GPD/ft2 in. Munsell Qu. Sz. Cont, Color Gr. Sz. Sh. Bed Trench 1 0-3 7.5YR 4/2 - sit 2 m gr mvfr cs 2flm .5 .6 2 3-8 7.5YR 413 - sit 2 m sbk mvfr gs if .5 .6 Ground elev 3 8-14 7.5YR 414 s1 2 m sbk mvfr cs if .5 .6 100.0 ft 4 1 14-32 i 7.5YR 4/4 fl f 7.5YR 5/8 sl 1 m sbk mvfr - - .4 .5 Depth to limiting factor ;• � a Ground elev Depth to limiting factor Ground elev Depth to limiting factor Ground elev Depth to limiting factor it e enfire�0acres lis unsu a or new cons ru ion of an on -site sys ern un er curr ni W1 regulations; pending regu a�fary changes may alter this current conditions require developement only via a vault privy followed by replacement by a mound system Hemams. showcd'fac'k ofA other tcrrpi15aye variabie-SOILICnc-ft+41Yv Remarks: KemarKs: k I G � , ,� 1 c S; h 1 1~ t �'51 �.�io O1 O.L Aw•1!-��w �-, 4I' �� 1 Q., "WW)i CtI S'1N"%-z , I) to p\-NQ O Lt4 -4p �-- m 1 `R S v = a , gy �7 7 4e~zTkg cti"ti-)x2` 17i' cn' '-3 o0s- DATE: OWNER NAME: PROJECT NAME: ADDRESS: COMPUTER #: PARCEL #: INFORMATION: am COMMENT FORM FOR FILE Ii"M -Z)/ b oom ` CERTIFIED SOIL TESTING Henry F. Grote, CSP, CHMM Environmental Health and Safety Specialist Post Office Box 57, Knapp, WI 54749-0057 (715) 665-2681 FAX:. (715) 665-2681 E-Mail: GROTEH®UWSTOUT.EDU January 31, 1999 Zoning Office St. Croix County Government Center 1101 Carmichael Road Hudson, WI 54016-7710 SUBJECT: Ground Water Monitoring Pursuant to Com 83.09 (7)(d)2. this letter serves as notification of intent to monitor ground water levels at the Doug and Peggy Rode site, N '/2, NW 1 /4, SW 1 /4, Sec. 34, T 28 N, R 16 W, Town of Eau Galle. This 20 acre site is identified by Computer # 008-1096-20-0000. Preliminary soil investigations in backhoe pits indicate a dense till layer, massive scl, at 30-40" below grade. Mottling above this layer extends into the 0-24" below grade area precluding the installation of mounds under current rules. The dense till suggests that below grade systems would be unsuitable for this area. Consequently, the intent of the monitoring is to verify site suitability for a mound system. Four, shallow ground -water monitoring wells were installed this fall in the area east of the small animal shed: MW-1 to a depth of 37" just into the scl till; MW-2 to a depth of 34" terminated in a layer of hard gr and sl; MW-3 to a depth of 34" just into the scl till; MW-4 to a depth of 30" just into the scl till. Henry F. Grote cc: Rode rode.gwm.ltr i r Certified Soil Tester CSTM 222774 Certified Hazardous Materials Manager CHMM 1217 Certified Safety Professional CSP 12129 at 161 DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE Comm 83.09 (b) Tables I a, I b, and 4a if percolation test results are filed with the county in accordance with sub. (1) after July, 1991, (c) Table 0 if soil evaluation reports as specified in sub. (4m) are filed with the county in accordance with sub. (1). (5) PERcoLA—n0N TESTS AND PROCEDURES, (a) Number and location. At least 3 percolation tests in each system area shall be conducted. The holes shall be located uniformly in the location and to the bottom depth of the proposed absorption system. More percolation tests may be necessary depending on system design. (b) Exemption. Percolation tests may not be required where a detailed soil map clearly indicates loamy sand or coarser mate- rial conditions at the depth of the proposed system, and for 3 feet below and the soil condition is confirmed by soil borings. The per- colation rate for design purposes shall be calculated using the slowest permeability listed in the soil survey report for the map unit. The county or department may require proof of the map find- ings or soil texture and resultant anticipated percolation rate. The exemption of percolation tests does not eliminate the required bore hole test data. (c) Percolation test hole. The test hole shall be dug or bored. It shall have vertical sides and have a horizontal dimension of 4 to 8 inches. The bottom and sides of the hole shall be carefully scratched with a sharp pointed instrument to expose the natural soil. All loose material shall be removed from the hole and the bot- tom shall be covered with 2 inches of gravel or coarse sand. (d) Test procedure —sandy soils- For tests in sandy soils the hole shall be carefully filled with clear water to a minimum depth of 12 inches above the bottom of the hole. The time for this amount of water to seep away shall be determined and this procedure shall be repeated. if the water from the second filling of the hole seeps away in 10 minutes or less, the test may proceed immediately as follows. Water shall be added to a point not more than 6 inches above the gravel or coarse sand. Thereupon, from a fixed refer- ence point, water levels shall be measured at 10—minute intervals for a period of one hour. If 6 inches of water seeps away in less than 10 minutes, a shorter interval between measurements shall be used, but in no case shall the water depth exceed 6 inches. If 6 inches of water seeps away in less than 2 minutes, the test shall be stopped and a rate of less than 3 minutes per inch shall be reported. The final water level drop shall be used to calculate the percolation rate. Soils not meeting the above requirements shall be tested as in par. (e). (e) Test procedure—orher soils. The hole shall be carefully filled with clear water and a minimum water depth of 12 inches shall be maintained above the bottom of the hole for a 4—hour period by refilling whenever necessary or by use of an automatic siphon. Water remaining in the hole after 4 hours shall not be removed. Thereafter the soil shall be allowed to swell not less than 16 hours nor more than 30 hours. Immediately following the soil swelling period, the measurements for determining the percola- tion rate shall be made as follows. Any soil which has sloughed into the hole shall be removed and the water level shall be adjusted to 6 inches over the gravel or coarse sand. Thereupon, from a fixed reference point, the water level shall be measured at 30—minute intervals for a period of 4 hours unless 2 successive water level drops do not vary by more than I/16 of an inch. At least 3 water level drops shall be observed and recorded. The hole shall be filled with clear water to a point not more than 6 inches above the gravel or coarse sand whenever it becomes nearly empty. Adjustment of the water level shall not be made during the last 3 measurement periods except to the limits of the last measured water level drop. When the first 6 inches of water seeps away in less than 30 min- utes, the time interval between measurements shall be 10 minutes and the test run for one hour. The water depth shall not exceed 6 inches at any time during the measurement period. The drop that occurs during the final measurement period shall be used in calcu- lating the percolation rate. (f) Mechanical rest equipment. Mechanical percolation test equipment shall be submitted to the department for approval. (6) VERMCATTON. (a) Borings. Depth to soil mottles, depth to high groundwater, soil textures, depth to bedrock and land slope may be subject to verification by the county or the department. The county or the department may require backhoe pits to be pro- vided for verification of soil boring data. (b) Percolation tests. The results of percolation tests may be subject to verification by the county or the department. The county or the department may require that percolation tests be reconducted under supervision. (c) Filling. Where the natural soil condition has been altered by filling or other methods used to improve wet areas, the depart- ment may require observation of high groundwater levels under saturated soil conditions. Note: Detailed Soil maps am of value for determining estimated Percolation rates And other soil characteristics. MoNrroluNG GROUNDWATER L EVEt s. (a) General. A prop- erty owner or developer may prove a documentation to the department and the county that soil mottling or other soil color patterns at a particular site are not an indication of seasonally satu- rated soil conditions or high groundwater levels. Documentation shall be made by conforming to the criteria in either subd. 1. or 2., unless sites are monitored against broad regional water tables in accordance with par. (b) 2. 1. A written report evaluating soil mottling and soil color pat- terns may be submitted to the department for review and approval. The report shall be prepared by a certified soil tester who has passed the examination specified in ch. Comm 5. The written report shall include the following: a. A review of the soils and landscape in the area of the pro- posed system installation; b. Soil descriptions to a depth of 5 feet below the bottom of the proposed system, to the depth of bedrock, or to a saturated. zone, whichever is shallower, using the United States department of agriculture system. The soil description shall identify each soil horizon for its texture, structure, consistence, Munsell colors, depth measured from the soil surface, macroporosity, continuity, boundary conditions, and any other factors that would influence the operation or design of the proposed soil absorption system; c. Description of the mottling including size, abundance, con- trast and Munsell color and reasons for the mottling; d. A recommended design loading rate from Tables 0, 1 or 4; linear loading rate; depth of the proposed system, geometry, and type of suitable soil absorption system that should be used on the site for disposal of wastewater; e. The soil types or series listed in a United States department of agriculture soil survey in the immediate area; f. A description of the site, including a 2 foot topographic con- tour map of the system area and 25 feet beyond; description of the vegetation and current land use; details of any artificial drainage; location of all compacted areas including roads and drives; and drainage patterns that may affect the proposed soil absorption sys- tem; and g. Written comments provided by the county. if the county has no comments, the county shall so state. 2. Groundwater levels may be monitored at specific sites in accordance with the procedures in pars. (b) through (f). Written notice of an intent to monitor shall be submitted to the department and the county with a completed "Soil Description Report" (SBD-8330) prior to monitoring. 3. The report shall be submitted to the department for review and approval. The department may perform an onsite inspection to review the soil conditions. (b) Precipitation. 1. In areas not subject to broad regional water tables, monitoring results shalt be considered when the Register. February. 1997, No 494 Comm 83.09 WISCONSIN ADMINISTRATIVE CODE 162 . iM highest of either the precipitation received at a local station, or the average of the 3 closest local stations, equals or exceeds, for both the periods (S Umber 1 through the last day_o ,-•Ecbm M and March 1 throur+Ir Mav 3J ), 8.S inches and 74inches respectively. 2. Where sites are subject to broad regional water tables, such as large areas of sandy soils, the fluctuation observed over a sev- eral year cycle shall be considered. In such cases, data obtained from the United States geological survey or other independent agency utilizing United States geological survey procedures shall be used to determine if a regional water table is at or near its nor- mal level. Determinations shall be made using hydrograph data and submitted on forms provided by the department. (c) Artificial drainage. Areas which are to be monitored shall be carefully checked for drainage tik and open ditches which could have altered natural high groundwater levels. Where such factors are involved, information on the location, design, owner- ship and maintenance responsibilities for such drainage shall be provided. Documentation shall be provided to show that the drain- age network has an adequate outlet, and can and will be main- tained. Sites affected by agricultural drain title shall not be accept- able for system installation. (d) Procedures. 1. 'Soil tester.' Monitoring shall be done by Solid pipe surrounded and sealed for at least I foot by puddled clay, bentonite or an equal parts mixture of soil - bentonite - cement. (A surface seal is Dot required if the entire soil profile is sand or gravel.) unspecified or excavated soil material. a certified soil tester. 2. 'Notification.' The certified soil tester shall notify in writ- ing, the county sanitary permit issuing authority or the depart- ment, of intent to monitor. It is expected the county authority or department may field check the monitoring at least once during the time of expected saturated soil conditions. 3. 'Number of wells.' At least 3 wells shall be monitored at a site for a proposed system and replacement If in the judgement of the county authority or the department more than 3 monitoring sites are needed, the certified soil tester shall be so advised in writ- ing. 4. 'Monitoring well design.' Monitoring wells designed as shown in the following sketch shall be constructed for monitoring. At least 2 wells shall extend to a drpLh ofat least 6 feet below ground IMTOE-1-nTifiall be a minimum of 3 feet below the However, with layered mottled soil over permeable unmottled soil, at least one well shall terminate within the mottled layer. Site conditions may, in some cases, require monitoring at greater depths. It will be the responsibility of the certified soil tester to determine the depth of the monitoring wells for each spec site and if in doubt, they shall request the guid- ance of the county or the department. 2" Observation well pipe set an -�'•-' 2" of pea gravel with pea gravel - extending 6" above the bottom of �. :ti.: 6" the pipe. (Gravel pack not required if natural material is coarse sand and/or gravel.) e • ° .�_ 2„ (e) Observations. 1. `Minimum frequency.' The first observa- tion shall be made on or before March 1 Sth. Observations shall be made thereafter evry 2 daX5 until June Ist or until the site is determiners in hr Omar,-; vpiabIe, ,ever comes first. If water is observed above the critical depth at any time, an observation shall be made I week later. If water is present above the critical depth at both observations, monitoring may cease because the site is considered unacceptable. If water is not present above the criti- cal depth at the second observation, monitoring shall continue until June 1 st. If any 2 observations 7 days apart show the presence of water above the critical depth, the site is unacceptable and the department shall be notified in writing. 2. 'More frequent interval.' The occurrence of rainfall(s) of 112 inch or more in a 24 hour period during monitoring may neces- sitate observations at more frequent intervals. (f) Reporting data. 1. 'Unsuccessful site.' When monitoring shows saturated conditions, data giving test locations, ground elevations at the wells, soil profile descriptions, soil series if avaii- Vented cap or cover on 1" to 4" pipe terminating above ground surface to prevent entry of surface water and to facilitate locating Bore hole shall be 4" - A" larger than outside diameter of observation well pipe size Diameter l" - 4" able from soil maps, dates observed, depths to observed water and local precipitation data (monthly from September 1st to June Ist and daily during monitoring) shall be submitted in writing, with 2 copies sent to the department and one to the county authority. 2. 'Successful site,' When monitoring discloses that the site is acceptable, documentation including location and depth of test holes, ground elevations at the wells, soil profile descriptions; soil series if available from soil maps; dates observed; results of observations, local precipitation data (monthly from September 1st to June 1st and daily during monitoring) and information on artificial drainage shall be submitted in writing, with 2 copies to the department and one to the county authority. A request to install a soil absorption system shall be made to the department along with the appropriate review fee in s. Comm 83.08 (3) (c). (8) WINTER son. T MNG. (a) General. Soil testing should be done only when weather and light conditions make accurate eval- uation of site conditions possible. Soil testing attempted under winter conditions is difficult and precautions should be observed. Register, February, 1991, No. 494 CERTIFIED SOIL TESTING Henry F. Grote, CSP, CHMNI Environmental Health and Safety Specialist Post Office Box 57, Knapp, WI 54749-0057 (715) 665-2681 FAX: (715) 665-2681 E-Mail: GROTEHOUWSTOUT.EDU January 31, 1999 Zoning Office St, Croix County Government Center 1101 Carmichael Road Hudson, WI 54016-7710 SUBJECT: Ground Water Monitoring Pursuant to Com 83.09 (7)(d)2. this letter serves as notification of intent to monitor ground water levels at the Doug and Peggy Rode site, N /2, NW 1/4, SW 1/4, Sec. 34, T 28 N, R 16 W, Town of Eau Galle. This 20 acre site is identified by Computer # 008-1096-20-0000. Preliminary soil investigations in backhoe pits indicate a dense till layer, massive scl, at 30-40" below grade. Mottling above this layer extends into the 0-24" below grade area precluding the installation of mounds under current rules. The dense till suggests that below grade systems would be unsuitable for this area. Consequently, the intent of the monitoring is to verify site suitability for a mound system. Four, shallow ground -water monitoring wells were installed this fall in the area east of the small animal shed: MW-1 to a depth of 37" just into the scl till; MW-2 to a depth of 34" terminated in a layer of hard gr and sl; MW-3 to a depth of 34" just into the sel till; MW-4 to a depth of 30" just into the scl till. 4-2 , Henry F. Grote cc: Rode rode.gwrn.ltr Certified Soil Tester Certified Hamdous Materials Manager Certified Safety Professional CSTM 222774 CHMM 1217 CSP 12129