Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutOrdinance 2011 (803) A ENDMIE NTS TO ST. CROIX COUNTY CODE OF ORDINANCES LAND USE AND DEVELOPMENT CATER 17 ZONING Section 17.72 Rezoning Amendments Ordinance No. 96 3 C ~a 0 1 St. Croix County, Wisconsin The St. Croix County Board of Supervisors does ordain as follows: WHEREAS, David & Gerda Hagen applied to St. Croix County Planning and Zoning Department to rezone approximately 3.9 acres in the N 1/2 of the NW i/4 and Section 28, T31N, R17W, in the Town of Stanton, from Agricultural to Agricultural Residential; and WHEREAS, the St. Croix County Community Development Committee held a public hearing on the rezoning request on October 20, 2011 in the Agricultural Service and Educational Center in Baldwin, Wisconsin; and WHEREAS, the St. Croix County Community Development Committee considered all written information and verbal testimony presented at the hearing, and made the following findings in support of the request: 1. The Town of Stanton has recommended approval. 2. The request is consistent with the St. Croix County Development Management Plan and the St. Croix County Natural Resources Management Plan based on: a. The parcel is in the rural planning area and is an appropriate use. b. Tlie proposed use is consistent with minimum lot size requirements in the rural planning area. c. The request is generally consistent with the surrounding neighborhood, countryside or terrain. d. The proposed use has minimal potential to adversely impact stormwater management. e. The proposed use has minimal potential to adversely impact water resources with sedimentation resulting from erosion. f. The proposed use has minimal potential to adversely impact shoreland areas or wetlands and closed depressions located in shoreland areas. g. The proposed use has minimal potential to adversely impact closed depressions or wetlands. h. The proposed use is consistent with restricting development on slopes in excess of 20%. i. The proposed use is consistent with policies to preserve woodlands, prairie remnants, unique open spaces, or environmental corridors. j. The proposed use is consistent with the County's policy to favor agricultural uses over non-agricultural uses when considering land use conflicts. k. The request does protect or preserve agricultural land. 1. The proposed use is generally consistent with the goal to protect and improve groundwater quality to supply clean water for drinking and recharging surface waters and wetlands. m. The proposed use is generally consistent with the goal to protect and enhance surface waters and wetlands to preserve their ecological functions and recreational and scenic values. 1 n. The proposed use is generally consistent with the goal to protect and restore fish and wildlife habitats for native species, improved water quality, recreational opportunities, and natural beauty. o. The request is generally consistent with the goal to preserve agricultural land for crop production, scenic values, and wildlife habitat. 3. It appears that the proposed use can comply with standards in the Land Use, Subdivision and Sanitary ordinances. 4. The proposed use is consistent with the spirit or intent of the Ordinance. 5. The request meets the requirements in WSS 91.48 (1). THEREFORE, the following described parcel is hereby rezoned from Agricultural to Agricultural Residential: Commencing at the North Quarter corner of said Section 28; thence along the north brae of the Nty1/4 of said Section 28 N89'4238V a distance of 1124.65 feet to the point of beginning; thence continuing along said north line of the NVVI/4 N69`42M VV a distance of 420.52 feet; thence S01`0026E a distance of 405.03 feet; thence S89-42z$-E a distance of 420,52 feet; thence N01`0026V a distance of 405.03 feet to the point of beginning. Containing 3.909 acres more or less. Subject to right=of-way along the north side for 200th Avenue and subject to all easements, restrictions and covenants of record. This Amendment offered by the Community Development Committee on November 1, 2011. YES NO ABSTAIN ABSENT SUPERVISOR SIGNATURE ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ Steven Hermsen ( Sharon Norton- E ❑ ❑ ❑ Bauman ❑ ❑ James Stauffer ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ Richard Marzolf ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ William Peavey ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ Lorin Sather ❑ ❑ ❑ u Robert Shearer This Resolution was adopted by the St. Croix County Board Reviewed as to form on of Supervisors on -116 -e-m bar I o?b 0 r Greg Timmerman, Corporation Counsel Cindy Camp Il, County Clerk 2