Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutResolutions 2003 (15) ST. CROIX COUNTY RESOLUTION TERMINATING WISCONSIN WORKS (W -2) CONTRACT WITH STATE OF WISCONSIN RESOLUTION /S (42063) WHEREAS, 1995 Wisconsin Act 289 amended Chapter 29 of the Wisconsin Statutes to replace the Aid to Families with Dependent Children (AFDC) Program with the Wisconsin Works Program and to include he Wisconsin Works (W -2) Program as part of the Food Stamp Program and Medical Assistance Program, and WHEREAS, on August 20, 1996 the St. Croix County Board of Supervisors authorized the St. Croix County Department of Health and Human Services (DHHS) the authority to contract with the State of Wisconsin to be the W -2 Agency in St. Croix County, and WHEREAS, said resolution also required the Health and Human Services Board to review the benefits of W -2 Program administration, and WHEREAS, the State of Wisconsin has changed the method for funding the W -2 program in Wisconsin resulting in losses to many Wisconsin counties, including St. Croix County. NOW, THEREFORE, be it resolved that the St. Croix County chooses to exercise language in the 2002- 2003 W -2 Contract terminating the contract with 120 -day written notice. Dated this day of May, 2003. Offered by: St. Croix County Health and Human Services Board. A FFIRMATIVE: a-14,4x) NE GATIVE: '//! a. s .. ctk / L. diz s /61:5 d'e.; \ "A: - � ( Z? 4 Adopted by the St. Croix County Board of Supervisors on May 20, 2003. 1— Cindy Campbell, County Clerk FACT SHEET ECONOMIC SUPPORT MAY 9 2003 Resolution to terminate Wisconsin Works (W -2) contract with the State of Wisconsin: Per last week's communication, data on W -2 Revenue has just been received and is not good! The W -2 contract section 19.1 states either party may terminate this contract without cause, with a 120 -day written notice. We continue the struggle to access the W -2 funding. With the report for the first quarter from the (RMTS) Random Moment Time Study in hand, we feel it would not be cost efficient for us to remain in the W -2 business. Looking at what happened in 2002, we requested $94,000 from W -2 and received $28,000. Using Federal Pass -Thru Funds (50% reimbursement) we were short $33,000. The same will happen in 2003 but it may be higher because of raises and higher insurance. If approved, we would be out of W -2 on 9- 28 -03. We would lay off one (FEP) Financial Employment Planner keeping in mind we were going to lay off one FEP 01 -01 -03 but she took a voluntary lay off in August of 2002, this is a net reduction of two positions. The current FEP reduction has been covered by a timely resignation. The W -2 caseload consists of about 130 cases, however all of these cases are receiving Medical Assistance and Food Stamps and those two programs will remain with the County. We will actually not lose any cases. We will just have less work to do on the cases we continue to have. The eligibility portion of the Child Care Program will go with the W -2 Program, however, the authorization portion of the Child Care Program will remain with the County. We will deal directly with whoever takes W -2 to enter the authorizations into the computer. Unfortunately, the authorization portion of the program is the most time consuming.