Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout002-1002-50-050 /66Z • l y IC:1-5a Safety and Buildings bZ 2-9 J(Q , 210 A �ZO 10541N RANCH ROAD commerce.Wl.gov HAYWARD WI 54843 TDD#: (608)264-8777 ,f isconsin �� '�, www.commerce.wi.gov/sb/ P .w u� .. .. �� -- www.wisconsin.gov Department of Commerce --- - - Jim Doyle,Governor Mary P.Burke,Secretary December 27,2006 CUST ID No. 46672 ATTN.•POWTS Building Inspector MARK W IVERSON ZONING OFFICE EVERGREEN IRRIGATION INC ST CROIX COUNTY SPIA PO BOX 155 1101 CARMICHAEL RD HAMMOND WI 54015 HUDSON WI 54016 (Please forward a copy of this letter to the fire department conducting inspections of this project.) CONDITIONAL APPROVAL ldentcxt©rt I�Iumbers PLAN APPROVAL EXPIRES: 12/27/2008 Transaction ID No. 1355183 SITE: Daniel Wine Site ID No. 721522 Town of Baldwin, St Croix County Please,xefer to,botkidentificat�ion numbers, e SE 1/4,NE 1/4, S2,T29N,R16W above,in all correspondence witthea 9 FOR: Object Type: Soil Saturation Determination Regulated Object ID No.: 1112865 The submittal described above has been reviewed for conformance with applicable Wisconsin Administrative Codes and Wisconsin Statutes. The submittal has been CONDITIONALLY APPROVED. The owner,as defined in chapter 101.01(10),Wisconsin Statutes,is responsible for compliance with all code requirements. The following conditions shall be met during construction or installation and prior to occupancy or use: 1. Approval is hereby granted pursuant to s.Comm 85.60(2),Wis.Adm. Code,to estimate the depth to seasonal soil saturation based on an interpretive determination process. Approval of the interpretive determination negates the requirement in s. Comm 85.30(2)(b),Wis.Adm. Code to designate the ground surface as the highest level of soil saturation when redoximorphic features are less than 4 inches below the bottom of the A horizon. 2. The estimated highest level of prolonged soil saturation approved under this determination is 12-13 inches below grade. At least 24 inches of sand lift on top of 12 inches of unsaturated,in-situ soil is required for adequate treatment and dispersal. 3. The basal soil application rate for the mound shall be<0.4 gpd/sf,and the linear loading rate<_5.0 gpd/ft. 4. Chisel plowing to a depth of 9-12 inches is necessary to reorient platy structure. In addition,the site evaluator recommends placing 3-4 inches of sand down prior to plowing and then plowing through the sand to incorporate it into the A horizon thus improving sand to soil contact area and infiltration. The mound shall be located as close to CST B-2 as possible to avoid the compacted area near CST B-1. 5. Landscaping up slope of the mound shall be incorporated into the POWTS design to prevent surface water from concentrating along the up slope edge of the mound and to divert surface water drainage away from the system. 6. This approval shall remain valid unless the site is altered in such a way that the depth to soil saturation would change or if saturated conditions are observed for seven consecutive days at depths less than 3 feet below the infiltrative surface of the POWTS distribution component. 7. This approval in no way relinquishes the use of color patterns to estimate the depth to high groundwater on any other parcels or portions of parcels. 8. A copy of this approval letter and attachments must accompany the mound system design for this site for purposes of plan approval and sanitary permit issuance. MARK W IVERSON Page 2 12/27/2006 If the Interpretive Determination Report was accompanied with a plan and an expiration date is shown on this letter, the expiration date only applies to the plans for the design,not to the decision on the Interpretive Determination Report. A copy of the approved plans,specifications and this letter shall be on-site during construction and open to inspection by authorized representatives of the Department,which may include local inspectors.If plan index sheets were submitted in lieu of additional full plansets,a copy of this approval letter and index sheet shall be attached to plans that correspond with the copy on file with the Department.All permits required by the state or the local municipality shall be obtained prior to commencement of construction/installation/operation. If this construction project will disturb one or more acres of land,an Erosion Control Notice of Intent(NOI)shall be filed with the department 14 days prior to any earth disturbing activities. In granting this approval the Division of Safety&Buildings reserves the right to require changes or additions should conditions arise making them necessary for code compliance.As per state stats 101.12(2),nothing in this review shall relieve the designer of the responsibility for designing a safe building,structure,or component. Inquiries concerning this correspondence may be made to me at the telephone number listed below,or at the address on this letterhead. Sincerely, Fee Required$ 100.00 Fee Received$ 100.00 M Balance Due $ 0.00 Leroy sky,PS ,POWTS astewater Specialist Integrated Services Bureau WtSMAR`f"code:' 633 (715)726-2544 Voice (715)726-2549 Fax leroy.j ansky @wisconsin.gov INTERPRETIVE DETERMINATION REPORT Property Owner: Daniel Wine 1160 260 ' Street Glenwood City, WI 54013 r Site Location: SE '/4 of the NE '/4, Sec. 2,Town 29N,Range 16W Town of Baldwin St. Croix County P.O.W.T.S. Conditionally f q- DII PAPTME:NT OF COMMERCE i y11�nt�'�D repared by: HAM DIVISION OF SAFETY AND BUILDINGS ,x MOt� , W1SCONSSIN eLE CO RESP• ENCE qL erson, PSS#197, CST#46672 December 8, 2006 Date RECEIVED Evergreen Irrigation Inc. DEC 2 7 2006 Mark Iverson,Professional Soil Scientist P.O.Box 155 SAFETY& BUILDINGS Hammond, WI 54015 Phone: 715-796-5664 Fax: 715-796-5246 e-mail: evergreenetc @baldwin-telecom.net TABLE OF CONTENTS I. Introduction .............................................................................................................1 II. Project Information..................................................................................................I III. Method.....................................................................................................................1 IV. Discussion of Results...............................................................................................2 A. Local Hydrology..........................................................................................2 B. Geomorphology...........................................................................................2 C. Soil Disturbance and Hydraulic Modifications............................................2 D. Landscape Position and Local Topography.................................................3 E. Soil Series and Mapping Units....................................................................3 F. Additional Data............................................................................................5 G. Comparative Analysis..................................................................................5 H. Government Reports and Comments...........................................................5 V. Conclusions and Recommendations........................................................................5 VI. References................................................................................................................7 TABLES Table 1 - Soil Series Characteristics Table 2 - Hydric Soil Classification FIGURES Figure 1 - USGS Topographic Map Figure 2 - Soil Map APPENDICES Appendix A - Soil Evaluation Report Appendix B - Government Reports I. INTRODUCTION On December 4,2006 Mark Iverson,Professional Soil Scientist#197 and Certified Soil Tester#46672, completed an interpretive onsite soils evaluation. An interpretive evaluation is required because the site does not meet the requirements to install a new private on-site waste treatment system(POWTS)through completion of a conventional onsite soils evaluation(<A+4 inches of acceptable soil must be present). The onsite evaluation was completed through the observation of the soil profiles at five test pit locations. This report has been prepared to present the results of an interpretive onsite soils evaluation. The evaluation was completed at the request of the owner Daniel Wine. The property is located %2 mile north of 110th Ave. on 260th Street in the township of Baldwin, St. Croix County, Wisconsin. On November 30th preliminary hand dug test pits were observed by Mark Iverson to determine if a site suitable for installation of a POWTS could be found through conventional testing methods. The preliminary evaluation concluded that A+4 soils were not present within the tested areas. However,potential sites were identified to complete an interpretive assessment of the soil characteristics.No data was recorded during the preliminary site evaluation.Preliminary test pits were completed over the entire 20 acre parcel. IL PROJECT INFORMATION The following is site-specific background information: Property Owner: Daniel Wine 1160 260th Street Glenwood City, WI 54013 715-688-9282 Site Location: SE '/4 of the NE '/4, Sec.2,Town 29N,Range 16W Parcel ID#002-1002-50-000 Town of Baldwin St. Croix County Historic Land Use: Vacant,miscellaneous storage,and pasture(7-8 years ago) Current Land Use: Vacant woodland(north) and miscellaneous storage(south) Vegetation: The vegetation within the tested area consists of miscellaneous grasses. There are no signs of stress within the tested area due to excess or insufficient moisture. Hydric vegetation was not observed within the project area. III. METHOD This interpretive evaluation and report was completed following the guidelines set forth in Comm 85.60(2) of the Wisconsin Administrative Code and in the summary provided by Leroy Jansky titled,"Preparing the Interpretive Determination Report"(March 13, 2002). t IV. DISCUSSION OF RESULTS A. Local Hydrology 1. Surface Water Drainage Patterns—Surface water drainage is uniform over the proposed system area. The proposed system location is on the back slope. The slope within the proposed system area is approximately 7 to 11%. Evidence of concentrated surface water flow was not observed within the proposed system area. 2. Subsurface Water Drainage -The loam and sandy loam texture and lack of compaction within the A horizon of borings 2 and 3 and just beneath the A horizon of borings 1,2, and 3,offers good infiltration for the typical rain event. Moderate to sever compaction was observed in the upper four to six inches of boring 1. In its current state the compaction observed in boring 1 will affect the drainage in the upper six inches but not in the soil below. During and immediately following frozen conditions and following heavy precipitation events,runoff will be much greater. Water percolation is limited in the soil profile at 13 to 25 inches below surface by the presence of dense glacial till. 3. Artificial Drainage Devices—No artificial drainage devices were observed during the completion of the evaluation. 4. Contributing Drainage Area—The proposed system area is located on the backslope of the hill slope profile. Although there is a significant contributing drainage area up slope the volume that reaches the proposed area is limited near the fence line. Through annual plowing a slight surface water diversion has been created on the west side of the fence line. This diversion causes the water to drain north along the fence and around the proposed system area. 5. Soil Saturation—Saturated soil was not encountered within the tested area. The area has had unusually dry conditions for the last two months. 6. Surface Water Elevations- Surface water within 1/4 mile of the site if present has been identified on Figure 1. B. Geomorphology 1. Parent Material—The parent material is glacial outwash/till. 2. Landform Type—Ground moraines. C. Soil Disturbance and Hydraulic Modifications The proposed system location is in vacant field. No hydraulic modifications, such as drain tile or ditches,were observed at the time of the assessment. No additional surface water is received from impervious surfaces. The surface soils p have been compacted on the south side of the site from equipment and material storage and compaction may have occurred previously within the system area from livestock grazing. 2 D. Landscape Position and Local Topography The regional topography is shown on figure 1. The ground surface elevation is approximately 1230 feet mean sea level (msl). The topography within the proposed system area is shown on the site map included in Appendix A. The proposed system elevation is 100.00 feet itvl� The shape of the slope within the proposed system area is linear(perpendicular to the contour)and linear (parallel to the contour). FIGURE 1—USGS TOPOGRAPHIC MAP s r d95 DD r . _ J ' • �46essrn+ it + Pr16pb�tjr j 26 th 262 • :P ^f E. Soil Series and Mapping Units The Soil Survey of St. Croix County maps the soils on the property as Freeon silt loam(FnB),Magnor silt loam(MaB), Santiago silt loam(SaC2). The location of each soil type is identified on Figure 2. The primary soil characteristics as described in the series description are identified on the Table 1. 3 TABLE 1—SOIL SERIES CHARACTERISTICS Texture Parent Material Perm ability Soil A E or B Surface Subsurf. Surface Subsurf, Drainage Series Horizon Horizon Class Fn SIL SIL Loess Till M MS to S MW Ma SIL SIL Loess Till M MS to S SP Sa SIL SIL/SL 1 Loess 1 Till M I S to MS W Abbreviations Permeability IM=Impermeable MS =Moderately Slow RA=Rapid VS =Very Slow M=Moderate VR=Very Rapid S=Slow MR=Moderately Rapid Drainage Class VP=Very Poorly W=Well P=Poorly SE=Somewhat Excessively SP= Somewhat Poorly E=Excessively MW=Moderately Well TABLE 2—HYDRIC SOIL CLASSIFICATION NRCS-USDA Soil Series Component Inclusions USACOE Fn No None No Ma No Adolph No Sa No None No USACOE=US Army Corps of Engineers FIGURE 2—SOIL MAP a F. Field Observations The soil present within the proposed system is similar to the description of the mapped soil unit Freeon silt loam, identified in the St. Croix County soil survey. The A horizon extends 6 to 13 inches below surface within the proposed system area(Borings 1,2,and 3). Moderate granular structure is dominant in the A horizon,however weak platy structure was present in boring 1 from the surface to six inches below surface. The platy structure is most likely due to compaction from previous equipment use or cattle grazing. Oxidized root channels were present from 0 to 6 inches below surface in boring 1. The subsoil within the proposed system area includes three to seventeen inches of sandy loam and loam that is void of redoximorphic features. The redoximorphic features observed in the subsoil are first encountered at 13 to 25 inches below surface. The soil on site does not meet the hydric soil criteria. The lack of hydric soils indicates that the soil is likely not saturated for greater than 5%of the growing season(approximately 7 consecutive days). A dominance of hydrophytic vegetation was not observed within the proposed system area. The lack of these features does not preclude the possibility that the soil is saturated for a prolonged period of time prior to or on occasion during the growing season. G. Comparative Analysis Soil borings(B-1,B-2,and B-3)were completed within the proposed system area. Two additional borings were completed one upslope(B-4)and one downslope(B- 5)of the proposed system area. The conditions observed at borings B4 and B-5 had some differences in comparison to borings completed within the proposed system area. Borings 4 and 5 lacked the sandy loam and loam subsoil present within the borings completed in the proposed system area. They instead were comprised of silt and fine sandy loam. In addition platy structure was observed in the subsoil of boring 4 directly beneath the 1sc horizon and in the 3`d and 4th horizons of boring 5. H. Government Reports and Comments An inspection report completed by Leroy Jansky,Wisconsin Department of Commerce, is included in Appendix B. V. Conclusions and Recommendations Seasonal saturation appears to be limited to greater than 6 inches below surface,the majority of the time. The lack of soil dominated by low chroma colors within the profile indicates that the redoximorphic features observed are not due to a high water table or perching conditions. The cause of the redox features observed in the test pits is most likely attributed to short-term seasonal saturation due to slow permeability of the subsurface horizons. The redox features observed in horizon 1 of boring 1 are due to 5 slow permeability of the compacted soil. Reorientation of the platy structure by chisel plowing after placing 3 to 4 inches of ASTM-33 sand on the system area will allow the dispersion of effluent into the subsoil. The site is suitable for installation of a POWTS (mound system) for the following reasons: 1.) Redoximorphic features were not observed within the subsoil to a depth of 13 to 25 inches below surface along the proposed system contour at B-1, B-2,or B-3. 2.) Platy structure and redoximorphic features observed in the first horizon of boring 1 can be remediated by placing 3 to 4 inches of ASTM-33 sand on the system area and chisel plowing. This will provide a dispersal route for the effluent through the compacted topsoil and into the subsoil. 3.) Neither hydric soils nor a dominance of hydrophytic vegetation are present within the proposed system area. 4.) There are no features that concentrate surface water flow toward the proposed location of the system. 5.) The slope at the proposed system location is 7 to 11%. The slope is uniform with no dips or valleys at the proposed system location. 6.) Lack of redox features in the subsoil just beneath the A horizon indicates that the soil is not saturated for prolonged periods during the growing season. 7.) The lack of soil dominated by low chroma colors indicates that the redoximorphic features observed at depth are due to temporary seasonal saturation and not from a permanently high water table or perching condition. The following recommendations should be considered during installation of the proposed system: l.) The system should be installed on the 100.0' contour to stay within the tested area. 2.) Sand fill shall consist of 2.0' of material meeting ASTM C-33 specifications. 3.) The tillage must be completed with a chisel plow to a minimum depth of nine inches below native ground surface during dry conditions. 4.) The basal loading rate shall not exceed 0.4 GPD/fl for EFF#l. 5.) The system shall be designed to have a linear loading rate of 5.0 GPD/ft or less. 6.) The system will follow the contour(100.0')and be nearly linear. 7.) The area upslope of the mound near B-4 must be altered to limit the influence of surface water received from upslope. 8.) If a contour length of less than 120 feet is necessary,the mound shall be installed as close to B-2 as is possible to take advantage of the limited compaction on the north side of the tested area. 6 The final approval of this site must be made by the Wisconsin Department of Commerce and the St. Croix County Zoning Department.This report represents the observations and professional opinion of Mark Iverson,Professional Soil Scientist(#197)and Certified Soil Tester(#46672). VI. REFERENCES 1.) United States. United States Department of Agriculture Soil Conservation Service, in cooperation with Research division of the College of Agriculture and Life Sciences University of Wisconsin. Soil Survey of St. Croix County, Wisconsin. 1978. 2.) State of Wisconsin.Department of Commerce Code,Chapters 83 and 85. 3.) US Department of Agriculture,Natural Resources Conservation Service. 1996. Field Indicators of Hydric Soils in the United States. G.W Hurt, Whited,P.M., and Pringle,R.F. (eds).USDA,NRCS,Fort Worth, TX. 4.) Schoeneberger, P.J.,Wysocki,D.A., Benham,E.C., and Broderson, W.D. (editors), 2002. Field book for describing and sampling soils,Version 2.0. Natural Resources Conservation Service,National Soil Survey Center, Lincoln,NE. 5.) United States. Us Geological Survey. Topographical downloaded from http://terraserver.microsoft.com/ 6.) St.Croix County. St. Croix County Land Information System. http://72.21.230.178/website/pasystem/gisportal.htm 7.) United States. United States Department of Agriculture-Natural Resources Conservation Service. Hydric Soil List for St. Croix County, Wisconsin. ftp•//ftp-fc sc "ov.usda.g;ov/W1/Soil/hyd/hyd109.htm 8.) United States. Us Army Corps of Engineers. 1987. Corp of Engineers Wetland Delineation Manual, Technical Report Y-87-1. USAEWES Environmental Laboratory, Vicksburg, MS. 7 APPENDIX A SOIL EVALUATION REPORT s Wisconsin Department of Commerce SOIL EVALUATION REPORT Page I of 3 Division of Safety and Buildings In accordance with Comm 85,Wis.Adm.Code 7 4^ '1S5 Attach complete site plan on paper not less than 8`/z x 11 inches in size. Plan must County St. Croix 66L• 166 Include but not limited to:vertical and horizontal reference point(BM),direction and Parcel I.D. Percent slope,scale or dimensions,north arrow,and BM referenced to nearest road. Revie d by Date Please print all information Il l Personal information you provide may be used for secondary purposes(Privacy Law,s. 15.04(1)(m)) Property Owner Property Location Daniel Wine Govt.Lot SE % NE V4 s I T 2 N 16 E(or)W Property Owner's Mailing Address Lot# 1BIock# ISubd.NameorCSM# 1160 260th Street City State Zip Code Phone ❑City ❑Village 0 Town Nearest Road Glenwood Ci WI 54013 715-688-9282 1 Baldwin 260th Street 0 New Construction Use: El Residential/Number of Bedrooms 4 Code derived design flow rate 600 GPD ❑Replacement ❑Public or Commercial—Describe: Parent Material Outwash Flood Plain elevation if applicable N/A ft. General comments and recommendations: )Z a 1 Boring# Boring ©Pit Ground Surface Elevation 1 0.0 ft. th to Limiting factor 0& 13 in. Soil Apolication Rate Horizon Depth Dominant Color Redox Description Texture Structure Consistence Boundary Roots GPD/fe In. Munsell Qu.Sz.Cont.Color Gr.Sz.Sh. *Eff#1 *Eff#2 1 0-6 10YR3/2 7.5YR416 f-1-d SL 1-n''pl s mfr s 2f 0.4 0.6 oAdized root channels 2-f r g 2 6-13 10YR4/3 None SL 1-m-bk mfr gs 1f 0.4 0.7 3 13-21+ 101f R5/3 7.5YR4 16f--1-i SL 1-co I mfr - 1f 0.4 0.6 opdized root channels r 2]Boring# 13 Boring OPit Ground Surface Elevation 100.2 ft. Depth to Limiting factor 25 in. Soil ADDlication Rate Horizon Depth Dominant Color Redox Description Texture Structure Consistence Boundary Roots PD/fe in. Munsell Qu.Sz.Cont.Color Gr.Sz S . *Eff#1 *Eff#2 1 0-8 10YR3/2 None SL 2-m-gr mfr gs 2f 0.6 1.0 2 8-17 10YR4/3 None SL 2-m-bk mfr gs if 0.6 1.0 3 17-25 10YR4/3 None GRSL 1-m-bk mfr cs 1f 0.4 0.7 4 25-30+ 5YR5/3 5YR4/6 c-2-d LS 0-sg mfr - - 0.7 1.6 *Effluent#1=BOD5>30:S 220 mg/L and TSS>30:5 150 mg/L *Effluent#2=BOD5 5 30 mg/L and TSS<_30 mg/L CST Name(Please Print) Signature CST Number Mark Iverson 46672 Address Date Evaluation Conducted Telephone Number P.O. Box 155 Hammond, WI 54015 December 4, 2006 715-796-5664 Property Owner Daniel Wine Parcel ID# 002-1002-50-00 Page 2 of 3 a Boring# O Boring OPit Ground Surface Elevation 98.0 ft. Depth to Limiting factor 16 in. Soil Application Rate Horizon Depth Dominant Color Redox Description Texture Structure Consistence Boundary Roots GPD/ftz in. Munsell Qu.Sz.Cont.Color Gr.Sz.Sh. *Eff#1 *Eff#2 1 0-7 10YR3/2 None SIL 2-f-gr mfr gs 2f 0.6 0.8 2 7-13 10YR3/3 None L 1-m-bk mfr gs 1f 0.4 0.6 3 13-16 10YR4/3 None SL 1-m-bk mfr gs 1f 0.4 0.7 4 16-30+ 10YR5/3 7.5YR4/6 f-1-d SL 2-m-bk mfr - - 0.6 1.0 Boring# 0 Boring ®Pit Ground Surface Elevation 103.4 ft. Depth to Limiting factor 8 in. 'I ADolication Rat Horizon Depth Dominant Color Redox Description Texture Structure Consistence Boundary Roots P /ftz in. Munsell Qu.Sz.Cont.Color Gr.Sz.Sh. *Eff#1 `Eff#2 1 0-8 10YR3/2 None SIL 1-f-pl mfr cs 2f 0.4 0.6 2 8-14 10YR5/3 10YR5/2&5/6 f-1-d FSL 1-m-pl mfr gs 1f 0.2 0.6 3 14-20 10YR5/3 10YR5/2&7.5YR5/6 c-2-d FSL 2-m-bk mfr gs - 0.4 0.8 4 20-31+ 5YR4/3 5YR4/6 o-2-d GRSL 2-m-bk mfr - - 0.6 1.0 5]Boring# I3 Boring aPit Ground Surface Elevation 94.7 ft. Depth to Limiting factor 6 in. Soil AoolicatiQn Rate Horizon Depth Dominant Color Redox Description Texture Structure Consistence Boundary Roots GPD/ftz in. Munsell Qu.Sz.Cont.Color Gr.Sz.Sh. *Eff#1 `Eff#2 1 0-6 10YR3/2 None SIL 2-f-gr mfr gs 3f 0.6 0.8 2 6-10 10YR3/2 Oxidized 7.5YR4ro channels SIL 1-m-bk mfr gs 1f 0.4 0.6 3 10-14 1 10YR5/2 10YR4/6 f-1-d SIL 1-f-pl mfr gs 1f 0.4 0.6 4 14-29+ 10YR4/3 10YR4/6 m-1-d FSL 2-m-pl mfr - - 0.0 0.2 *Effluent#1=BOD5>30:s220 mg/L and TSS>30<_150 mg/L *Effluent#2=BOD5<30 mg/L and TSS<_30 mg/L The Department of Commerce is an equal opportunity service provider and employer. If you need assistance to access services or Need material in an alternate format,please contact the department at 608-266-3151 or TTY 608-2648777. Page 3 of 3 0 ft. 24 ft. 40 ft. 80 ft. B-2 100.2 ,11Ole5\O \ B-5 94.7' B-3 e'y� 98.0' r o �r o co s i of3� p. , 7p3�4�'chA� •� C A B-4 103.4 B-1 100.0' r (tea' A V LU C. O Misc Storage Area e 0 �7p9Of�ebar Lot 1 20 Acres Property Line Lot 2 20 Acres BM#&Description Elevation - Bench Mark VB1 = Boring Location& Elevation All unmarked property lines are greater than 100'from borings Owner: Daniel Wine Site Information: Completed By: Mark Iverson 1160 260th Street SE 1/4, NE 1/4, S2, T29N, R16W 680 Larcom Street Glenwood City, WI 54013 Town of Baldwin Hammond, WI 54015 Phone: 715-688-9282 St. Croix County 715-796-5664 PSS#198/CST#46672 APPENDIX B GOVERNMENT REPORT 9 DEC-07-2006 013:24 From:DCOM SAFETY&BIILDING 715 726 2549 To:7157965246 P.1'1 SAFETY AND BUILDING13 DIVIe1ON tzc � �yy(,gpy Integrator!Servicse Bureau 1 3 rest spruce Street Chippewa Falls,WI 54729 INSPECTION REPORT "'=M(M 2 oats of Inspection: December 6,2006 Plumber Name and Address: Project Name: Wine NA Use: Residential Legal Description: SE, NE.2,29, 16W Site Number: Subdivision: Lot 1 Proposed CSM Cortltled Soil Tester Name and Address: Municipality: Town of Baldwin Mark Iverson,CST 46672,PSS 198 County: St. Croix PO Box 155 Hammond,WI 54015-0155 Plan Transaction Number. Sanitary Permit Number. Owner Name and Address: Daniel Wine Wastewater Flow: 600 gpd 1160 280th Street Persons Present: K. Grabau, R. Glenwood City,WI 54013 Yarrington, D.Wine An onsite soils verification was conducted at the above referenced site as per district policy for all site$ with less then four inches of unsaturated soil below the bottom of the A horizon. The intent of this Investigation Is to confirm initial observations by the certified soil tester(CST) relating to the presence or absence of redoximorphic features in the A horizon and/or subsoil. Irrsltu soil texture,Structure,and consistence factors were also reviewed as they relate to wastewater application rates. Other site conditions such as percent and direction of slope, landscape position, land surface contour length,and surface water hydrology may also be noted and their affects are factors considered In the recommendations and conclusions portion of this report. The soil profile at CST B-1 Is affected by past soil compaction that appears to have induced anaerobic(reducing) conditions under near saturation in the compacted parts of the A horizon. In the compacted part of the A horizon, root channels, rather than the soil matrix provided for atmospheric exchange when the surrounding matrix was very wet(not necessarily saturated). The pathways formed by roots allowed oxygen to enter the compacted soil matrix as the soil drained under gravity flow Reduced iron compounds In the soil matrix that were near these root channels were oxidized to form iron concentrations in the root channel. The lower 2 inches of the A Horizon and 6-7 inches of subsoil are free of redox concentrations and depletions. This type of discontinuity indicates that the iron concentrations In the A horizon are do to soil compaction and not the seasonal level of soil saturation noted at greater depths. if a mound system is designed to overcome limitations of soil compaction and platy structure,as well as a shallow depth to seasonal soil saturation, the linear loading rate should not exceed 6.0 gpd/ft and the basal wastewater application rated should not exceed 0,4 gpd/ft2. The lower linear loading rate and send Incorporated during chisel plowing to 12'+will compensate for prior compaction and prevent wastewater leakage at the mound toe. At least 23 inches of sand lift is recommended when applying septic tank effluent to the distribution cell of the mound to ensure proper treatment. The longest portion of the mound must be orientated along the contour The mound shall be constructed to divert surface water around the mound structure as much as possible- In addition, an up slope drainage ditch should be considered if It is determined that surface or subsurface hydrology is improved by intercepting water and diverting it away from the mound site. If there are any questions regarding this report, please contact me. L roy G J sky,W#ewater pfWilist cc: ®County ❑Plumber I.janskyCoommerce.state.wl. s E-mail ® CST []Owner 7151726-2544 Voice 715/72 549 Fax ❑Other L SAFETY AND BUILDINGS DIVISION commerce.wi.gov Integrated Services Bureau 13 East Spruce Strout ■ Chippewa Falls, WI 54729 ISCOf1SI1'1 INSPECTION REPORT www.commerce.-.wi.gov/sb2544 7- of Commerce rdreTt ECEIVED 6 Date of Inspection: December 6, 2006 Plumber Name and A 1 1 2006 Project Name: Wine NA Use: Residential ST. CROIX COUNTY Legal Description: SE, NE, 2, 29, 16W Site Number: Subdivision: Lo Pr posed CSM 22/sY` & Certified Soil Tester Name and Address: Municipality: T wn of Baldwin Mark Iverson,CST 46672, PSS 198 County: St. Croix PO Box 155 Hammond, WI 54015-0155 Plan Transaction Number: Sanitary Permit Number: Owner Name and Address: Daniel Wine Wastewater Flow: 600 gpd 1160 260th Street Persons Present: K. Grabau, R. Glenwood City, WI 54013 Yarrington, D. Wine An onsite soils verification was conducted at the above referenced site as per district policy for all sites with less than four inches of unsaturated soil below the bottom of the A horizon. The intent of this investigation is to confirm initial observations by the certified soil tester (CST) relating to the presence or absence of redoximorphic features in the A horizon and/or subsoil. In-situ soil texture, structure, and consistence factors were also reviewed as they relate to wastewater application rates. Other site conditions such as percent and direction of slope, landscape position, land surface contour length, and surface water hydrology may also be noted and their effects are factors considered in the recommendations and conclusions portion of this report. The soil profile at CST B-1 is affected by past soil compaction that. appears to have induced anaerobic (reducing) conditions under near saturation in the compacted parts of the A horizon. In the compacted part of the A horizon, root channels, rather than the soil matrix provided for atmospheric exchange when the surrounding matrix was very wet (not necessarily saturated). The pathways formed by roots allowed oxygen to enter the compacted soil matrix as the soil drained under gravity flow. Reduced iron compounds in the soil matrix that were near these root channels were oxidized to form iron concentrations in the root channel. The lower 2 inches of the A Horizon and 6-7.inches of subsoil are free of redox concentrations and depletions. This type of discontinuity indicates that the iron concentrations in the A horizon are do to soil compaction and not the seasonal level of soil saturation noted at greater depths. If a mound system is designed to overcome limitations of soil compaction and platy structure, as well as a shallow depth to seasonal soil saturation, the linear loading rate should not exceed 5.0 gpd/ft and the basal wastewater application rated should not exceed 0.4 gpd/ftz. The lower linear loading rate and sand incorporated during chisel plowing to 12"+ will compensate for prior compaction and prevent wastewater leakage at the mound toe. At least 23 inches of sand lift is recommended when applying septic tank effluent to the distribution cell of the mound to ensure proper treatment. The longest portion of the mound must be orientated along the contour. The mound shall be constructed to divert surface water around the mound structure as much as possible. In addition, an up slope drainage ditch should be considered if it is determined that surface or subsurface hydrology is improved by intercepting water and diverting it away from the mound site. If there are any questions regarding this report, please contact me. Leroy G. J sky, W ewater clalist cc: ® County ❑ Plumber Ljansky@commerce.state.wi. s E-mail © CST ❑ Owner 715/726-2544 Voice 715/726- 549 Fax ❑ Other Parcel 002-1002-50-050 01/30/2008 09:36 AM PAGE 10F1 Alt. Parcel 02.29.16.20A-20 002 - TOWN OF BALDWIN Current X ST. CROIX COUNTY, WISCONSIN Creation Date Historical Date Map # Sales Area Application # Permit # Permit Type 06/28/2007 00 0 Tax Address: Owner(s): O = Current Owner, C = Current Co-Owner O - WINE, DANIEL L DANIEL L WINE 3240 90TH AVE GLENWOOD CITY WI 54013 Districts: SC = School SP = Special Property Address(es): Primary Type Dist # Description * 1168 260TH ST SC 0231 BALDWIN-WOODVILLE AREA SP 1700 WITC Legal Description: Acres: 15.000 Plat: 5416-CSM 22-5416 002-07 SEC 2 T29N R16W PT SE NE (PT LOT 1 CSM Block/Condo Bldg: LOT 04 22-5334) BEING LOT 4 CSM 22-5416 Tract(s): (Sec-Twn-Rng 401/4 1601/4) 02-29N-16W SE NE Notes: Parcel History: Date Doc # Vol/Page Type 06/28/2007 854636 22/5416 CSM 02/15/2007 844610 QC 01/22/2007 843066 QC 12/28/2006 841396 22/5334 CSM more... 2008 SUMMARY Bill Fair Market Value: Assessed with: 0 Valuations: Last Changed: 07/13/2007 Description Class Acres Land Improve Total State Reason Totals for 2008: General Property 0.000 0 0 0 Woodland 0.000 0 0 Lottery Credit: Claim Count: 0 Certification Date: Batch Specials: User Special Code Category Amount Special Assessments Special Charges Delinquent Charges Total 0.00 0.00 0.00 KtuCIVCV J UL 6 111111111111 tf" 41111N!~ '611111111111111 IN ST. CROIX COUNTY 854636 SURVEYOR'S RECORD KATHLEEN H. WALSH REGISTER OF DEEDS ST. CROIX CO., WI ORD CERTIFIED SURVEY MAP 06/28/2007 FOR R03: 10PH VOLUME 22 , PAGE 541-6 VCERTIFIED UREY 5MAP 416 BEING LOT 1 OF CERTIFIED SURVEY MAP 115334• REC FEE: 13.00 LOCATED IN PART OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF CO PAGES: 2.00 THE FRACTIONAL NORTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 2• TOWNSHIP 29 NORTH. RANGE 16 WEST, TOWN OF BALDWIN. ST_ CROIX COUNTY, WISCONSIN Northeast Corner Section 2-29-16 UNPLATTED Found Aluminum Cap --1 LANDS No ol~ -tZ:w NW corner ' oo N IN Corner set 10' E. S87.33'50"E SE/NE - 8c 1s' S of fence 1327.04' --t' rn to 1293.99 Corner set 1o' f*i I Ir 509.41 south of fence 661 S87-33'50"E I rn ! o Z 784.58' 817.63' IEn I^' t4 LOT 3 33.~5^l loo I~d Olt 209,532 s ft. oil °1" IA I~ v m 217,881 sq.ft. 4.81 acress a loo l~ 5.00 acres not incl. r-o-w IC% incl. r-o-w V h, v m t o 7$3.49' 33. 1' I 01 I aF' g N89'35'30"W 816.50' ;50' IN - 1C$ to in N3 12~ U_NPLATTE_D Z OT 4 / _ C) building setback line ~~i S~+t° IA N lJ jS 25 I LANDS I ' 'I 653,418 sq.ft. 647,808 sq. ft. 395.77' oB 1S.00 acres 14.87 acres ~3 N89.35'30"w 428.78' 1 co o° 33.01'Z t a,, incl. r-o-w not incl. r-o-w Qo 41- shed soil e O OD , Po test V'N i~pFner set 5 ,IbSk~ eost of fence 880.15 h1 sarsa'a~"w East 114 Corner Section 2-29-16 Fd Survey Mark Nail z LOT_2_ CSM # 5334 PREPARED FOR: Daniel Wine DRAFTED BY: 3240 90th Avenue Joel A Brandt Glenwood City, WI 54013 JB SURVEYING LLC Note: Each parcel on this map is subject to State and County laws, rules and regulations 0-e. wetlands, minimum lot size, access to parcel, etc.). Before purchasing or developing any parcel, contact the St Croix County Zoning Office for advice. SCALE: 1' . 250' •JOK S-aW ` # 1 & 0 250' 500' ~ ssyo ~ ~ LEGEND North is referenced to the 0._..._-Government Corner (as noted) East Line of the Northeast _ Quarter of Sect 2-29-16, o-.--.....Set 3/4" x 18" Iron Rebar which bears S00°48'17"E weighing 1.502 lbs_/lineal f t 1`51-. Croix County Grid System) ....Found 3/4" Iron Rod Sheet 1 of 2 Vnl-_ 22 Pace 541f1- ST. CROIX COUNTY WISCONSIN l i s t / N t N ZONING OFFICE r~rr~r. ST. CROIX COUNTY GOVERNMENT CENTER 1101 Carmichael Road Hudson, Wl 54016-7710 (715) 386-4680 FAX (715) 386-4686 Page I) of COUNTY ON-SITE VERIFICATION FORM 'r'~ Inspector:E,rrr~,.r;.tAr_ ~f ate .r- Parcel ID Number •~-c~r °r! rroope-rtyOmer rope~Loca on bAtJ fa VtcX1 W 1 r-1E Gout. Lot tki V4 S T N R ±G E (or 4~J' Property 0 er°s Mailing iress Lot # Blo # [S!Lbd. ;Nama,~qr CSW~ t X.CAJL city Sato Zip Coe Phone Number ❑ City ❑ village n Nearest Rsa®d New Construction Use: 11 Residential INumber ofbedrooms..._,__........-_._._ Code derived design flow rate GPD ❑ Replacement ❑ Public or commercial - Describe: Parent material Rood Plain elevation K applicable -ft. Generpl comments and rigloommendations: i BorIng ❑ Baring t ❑ Pit Ground surface elev. Depth to limiting factor in. Soil Application Rate Horizon Depth Dominant Color Redox Dewiptien Texture 3tructura Consistence Boundary Rods GPDAP in.. Munsell Qu. 5z. Cont. Color Gr. Sz. Sh. `Eff#1 Tff#2 ~I Conditions 4 r. r Soil Survey descnot;:on.M -t r P Y, ..~~P f 'i'+.~ } t. mil'!.: fie,.. _.r -'r sH:d - ~ ~•`.+Cit,:CC~It~s ~ "Notts: ~ ~ wJ r 1 ~ - r A.--'kV."~^.,. P v'1 1 'F+. 1.A _ a ~t ~ _~-'vow.: t t S , Y ' • - FEE: i~ r; .4 ap ~r If t•s.M( r-{~ l~ 4tl ~.Q+.. 1k ufi ' /•-`~,G ~ .i1.. 1.. Wisconsin Department of Commerce SOIL EVALUATION REPORT Page of1-3 division of Safety and Buildings % in accordance with Comm 85, Wis. Adm. Code County Attach complete site plan on paper not less than 8 10 x 11 inches in size. P st include, but not limited to: vertical and horizontal reference point on a Parcel I.D. percent slope, scale or dimensions, norlh.arrow, # near t road. 2 - S Please print all in rma ion. evi Dite ny( nn CC Personal Information you provide may be used for secon ry pur Pf~a~y L145 .04 (1 (m)). f roL Pro TE~ner CRp1X Co RT"rty ocation ❑ J(_ t* W I A__~s• _)G 1/4 1/4 S T N R Gj 4E-(Or) W Q Property Owner's Mailing Address Lot # Block # Subd. Name or CSM# City State Zip Code one Number []City Village Town Nearest Road (745) &88 -~R 11 F CPS, New Construction UseM Residential / Number of bedrooms Code derived design flow rate GPD Replacement Public or commercial - Describe: _________N_A Parent material Flood Plain elevation if applicable General comments and recommendations: J1,~ 6t-/PP4-0-'s '4'rf?0kve art - S. ~ 5~~~ ya.rti • ~S ~O ~ 4'r- Baring # 0 i3onng Pit Ground surface elev. ft. Depth to limiting factor In. Soil Application Rate Horizon Depth Dominant Color Redox Description Texture Structure Consistence Boundary Roots GPD/ff in. Munsell Qu. Sz. Cont. Color Gr. Sz. Sh. 'Eff#1 'EffW C- (a N- F' . J 4 s h. t Al!skk / NO ex b L__ c- '21 oAdJ '5 12 AE -C Y1 o ; rQAi os1 L i'ter~ 5 ® Boring # ~ Boring - Pit Ground surface elev. ft Depth to limiting factor _ In. Soil Application Rate Horizon Depth Dominant Color Redox Description Texture Structure Consistence Boundary Roots GPD/ff' in. Munsell Qu. Sz. Cont Color Gr. Sz. Sh. 'Effr#_1 'Eff#2 1 i f l9 L8 51 Sit m 5bk Effluent #1 = BOD > 30 < 220 mg/L and TSS >30 < 150 mg(L ffl #2,= B D < mg/L and TSS < 30 mglL CST N (Please Print) - - . CST Number Address Da Eval Telephone Number Alq?.65 Su I e t Z5- gSSw s Property Owner Parcel ID Page _ Of Boring It Boring Pit Graugsurface v. _ --ft. Depth to limiting factor in. Soil Application Rate W.L.. Horizon Depth Dominant Q*x Redox Description Texture Structure Consistence Boundary Roots GPDAf in. Munsell Qu. §z. "i"tlfft. Color Gr. Sz. Sh. 'Eff#1 'Eff#2 A "-5 ID ;Z it 4k .18 13 6 ~ - M n~(:28US-e513- s; c,L ou s4 ?2 ❑ Boring # G Boring Pit Ground surface elev. ft. Depth to limiting factor In. Soil Application Rate Horizon Depth Dominant Color Redox Description Texture Stricture Consistence Boundary Roots GPD/ff in. Munsell Qu. Sz. Cont Color Gr. Sz. Sh. 'Eff#1 'Eff#2 Boring F-1 Boring # Ground surface elev. _ ft. Depth to limiting factor In. Pit Soil Application Rate Horizon Depth Dominant Color Redox Description Texture Structure Consistence Boundary Roots GPD/fF in. Munsell Qu. Sz. Cont. Color Gr. Sz. Sh. 'Eff#1 'Eff#2 ' Effluent #1 = BOD6 > 30 < 220 mg/L and TSS >30 < 150 mg/L ' Effluent #2 = BOD6 < 30 mg/L and TSS < 30 mg1L The Department of Commerce is an equal opportunity service provider and employer. If you need assistance to access services or need material in an alternate format, please contact the department at 608-266-3151 or TTY 608-264-8777. SBD-633OTert (R.07ro0) r AMMS Viewer Page 1 of 1 2~z ...''e}. a ..F i http://72.21.230.178/website/LRPortal/ARCIMS/MapFrame.asp?PIN= 9/29/2006