Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
008-2017-04-000
Wisconsin Department 0 t'nwr,merce SOIL AND SITE EVALUATION Page Of Division of Safety and 13r~ii.4ing~ in accordance with Comm 85, `th'is. Adm. Code L~ORIGJNAL ` - I Attach complete site plan or paper not less than 8 'h x 1 I inches in size. Plan must me de, tut - 4 ~ t ounty St. Croix not limited to: vertical arut hovizontal reference point (BM), direction and percent slop , scale or dimensions, north arrow :+no location and distance to the nearest road. arcel ID # ?s GAP- Zo ~ -7 ©~f -oaci V ST, CROIX Reviewed By: Date: APPLICANT INF 4~R.MATiON -Please print all information P WING COUN7~` Personal information you pi, ide inay be used for secondary purposes (Privacy Law, s. 15.04 Zt7 r„~J(y` ntr, 51&4e ~j 11" SI 1 50 l f ~lt/~ Property owner: Property location Kurt and Elizabeth Christensen Gov't lot: NE 1/4 SE 1/4 S23 T 28 N, R16 E (orR Property owner's mai lint, address: f k_ l.ot # Block # Subd. Name or CSM# 855 Benoy Road NA ftr jPG A City / State / Zip Code Phone number city Village Town Nearest Road Hudson /Wisconsin /54016 715-356--63"'0 Eat. ~T~tlle 25`to Avenue El New Constructioi, Use Residential/Ntimber of bedrooms Unknown Addition to existing building: NA ❑ Replacement ❑ Public or commercial - deseriK-, Code Design Flow Rate:: Lrnknown - must be appropriate size for the contour and soil restrictions Parent Material: Glaclf l 1-11 - ground moraine General Comments are . F, cornmendations: Soils are poorly drained glossoboralfs underlain by very dense gravely silty clay loam. Redox features are the result of perchin, A)ove the dense sandy loam layer. A long narlrow mound SAS is recommended for this site with 2.50 feet of sand fill. SOIL DESCRIPTION REPORT Boring # Horizon i `et th Dominant Redox Description "texture Structure Consistence Boundary Roots Soil Application Rate iu. Mansell Color Qu. Sz. Cant. Color M 1, Ci. Sz. Slt. GPD/FT- Pit 7 ! Eff# 1 Eff#2 Ap 0-9 10YR 3/2 NA sil 2rnsbk mfr aw 3f 0.6 0.8 roun 1 lev (a.) - E 6 ;12 p 1 OYR 4/3 f2f 7.5YR 5/6 sil w c 1 mpl mfr cw 2f 0.4 0.6 86.26 Bt I '2-17 IOYR 4/4 m2d 7.5YR 5/8 sici Irrlsbk rnfr aw NA 0.2 0.3 Depth to C 1 10YR 5/3 m3p 5YR 5/8 scl massive V limiting factor- in. I Remarks: Boring # Ap I 0 - 8 ° I OYR 3/2 NA Sil 2r(isbk i mfr aw 3f 0.6 0.8 Pn s r Bt 1 8 -12 10YR 5/3 m2f 7.5YR 5/8 sil we lrltpl 111 ft aw 2f 0.4 0.6 C i 12-I8 10YR 4/4 m3p 7.5YR 5/8 gr-scl massive ,round Elev ft. 86.26 Depth to limiting factor- in. 0 Remark-. CS"C Name: Eli M. Cats fried, Gottfried Environmental Signatuna; Tel. No. 715-833-1400 Address: 124-1/2 Gr.~lwn) Ave. Eau Claire, Wl. 5.4701 Date: 12 May 2005 CST # 221981 l SOIL DESCRIPTION REPORT roperty a owner Christensen Parcel ID# Y:. Boring # 'Horizon Depth Dominant Redox Description Texture Structure Consistence Boundary Routs Soil Application Rate in. I'Munsell Color Qu. Sz. Cont. Color Gr. Sz. Sh. i GPD/FTZ Pit 9 ! Eff# 1 Eff#2 Ap 0-8 10YR 3/2 NA sil 2msbk mfr aw 3f 0.6 0.8 Ground Bt 8-12 IOYR 5/3 m2d 7.5YR 5/8 sic] Impl mfr as if 0.2 0.3 Elev (ft.) 86.26 C 12-17 IOYR 4/4 m3p 5YR 5/8 cl massive Depth to limiting factor- in. 0 Remarks: Boring # Horizon Depth Dominant Redox description Texture Structure Consistence Boundary Roots Soil Application Rate in. Munsell Color Qu. Sz. Cont. Color Gr. Sz. Sh. GPD/FTZ Pit 10 Eff# I Eff#2 Apl 0-7 1OYR 3/2 NA A 2msbk mfr aw 2f 0.6 0.8 Ground Ap2 7-9 IOYR 3/2 fld 7.5YR 5/6 A Imsbk mfr aw if 0.2 0.3 Elev (ft.) 85.52 Bt 9-12 IOYR 5/3 m2d 7.5YR 5/8 sil w c Imsbk mfr aw NA 0.2 0.3 Depth to C 12-14 IOYR 4/4 m3p 7.5YR 5/8 gr-sicl massive limiting factor- in. 0 Remarks: Boring # Ground Elev (ft.) Depth to limiting factor- in. Remarks: Boring # Horizon Depth Dominant Redox description Texture Structure Consistence Boundary Roots Soil Application Rate in. Munsell Color Qu. Sz. Cont. Color Gr. Sz. Sh. GPD/FT2 Eff# I Eff#2 Ground Elev (ft.) Depth to limiting factor- in. Remarks: H M N 1m0 p m d U N ° m a 0 m ° o W d O C E~m o~ - 0-0 w o I I m V c ° I I ~v ~ m~ I I 6y n°o m S I I ~K u m I I ty J9 a E C~l I I II K~ ~ U ~ G I I UP ul w V D ' 1 1 I I 'm v 1 1 1 I \ n~ 6 1 \ `mL 1 1 1 \ \ \ m m 1\ \ \ °-OD m O OD o \ N -ter M ~(y \ \ \ \ ~ o F b--, 7 \ \ m~ 0 1 ` d ~ N d\ lT O \ I `Nil N C O O N 0\ \ \ \ N t+1 Iq n O \ I rn m of m o ao m n m n ~ >\a? \ 1 n o ¢ ~ 1 ~ o n o. 1 d n \ I cp `o N 0 m0 0 N= \ I p O_ t7 y O O I I I \ 11 \ n on I \ I I \ m _ 1 0 N \ ? m I 11 Q I \ U) C\ a0 \ \ Y > 1 \ \ ED g m \ \ R L O I_r~j I \ \ \ (V x m 60- w 0 d r ~Nrn aT \\Q II ~w I cM °M ul ~ = n v ~ - / 1 UZ W Ew D- c i / ado / o 10 / D r 0) / . aD N/ / / , a0 / ~yy co ~ ~ l6 M g m o~ Q `c- q-VOV at b~ MQ H , 00 < AM Parcel 008-2017-04-000 04/12/2012 09:55 PAGE 1 OF 1 Alt. Parcel M 23.28.16.597 008 - TOWN OF EAU GALLE Current IXI ST. CROIX COUNTY, WISCONSIN Creation Date Historical Date Map # Sales Area Application # Permit # Permit Type # of Units 11/22/2005 00 0 Tax Address: Owner(s): O = Current Owner, C = Current Co-Owner O - CHRISTENSEN, KURT & ELIZABETH KURT & ELIZABETH CHRISTENSEN 847 WYLDWOOD LN HUDSON WI 54016 Districts: SC = School SP = Special Property Address(es): Primary Type Dist # Description ` 2579 25TH AVE SC 0231 SCH D BALDWIN-WDVILLE SP 1700 WITC Legal Description: Acres: 6.680 Plat: 10-089-ROLLING MEADOWS FARM LOTS 1/6 008-0: SEC 23 T28N R16W PT NE SE ROLLING Block/Condo Bldg: LOT 004 MEADOWS FARM ('05) LOT 4 Tract(s): (Sec-Twn-Rng 401/4 1601/4) 23-28N-16W NE SE Notes: Parcel History: Date Doc # Vol/Page Type 12/01/2005 813339 2937/166 WD 11/22/2005 812709 10/089 PLAT 2012 SUMMARY Bill M Fair Market Value: Assessed with: Use Value Assessment Valuations: Last Changed: 10/07/2008 Description Class Acres Land Improve Total State Reason RESIDENTIAL G1 4.000 28,500 3,200 31,700 NO AGRICULTURAL G4 2.680 500 0 500 NO Totals for 2012: General Property 6.680 29,000 3,200 32,200 Woodland 0.000 0 0 Totals for 2011: General Property 6.680 29,000 3,200 32,200 Woodland 0.000 0 0 Lottery Credit: Claim Count: 0 Certification Date: Batch Specials: User Special Code Category Amount Special Assessments Special Charges Delinquent Charges Total 0.00 0.00 0.00 FINAL PLAT OF: ROLLING MEADOWS FARM LOCATION SKETCH LOCATED IN PART OF THE NE1/4 OF THE SE1/4 AND PART OF THE SE1/4 OF THE SE-1/4 OF SECTION 23, T28N, R1 8W, TOWN OF EAU OALLE, ST. CROM COUNTY, WISCONSIN. ,xlw NEw P FwsRAFNrs TMvoLE ■mETVBLESaRErotlPVAEnsup+ arH AveA,e rHE INSTALU arv YA0UTA06NFIBAMSUhEY srAxE, a+oesrwcrwBONALOwaxrLm LwE OR PREPARED FOR: NCl7 ~i rREEi UNE rHE OaruRO/JICEOCasIln+ErsraxE Or wgie EUUOEmcw651D+5D+ TOTAL PARCELARFA: >M AVp1ArpNOP a6.EOFN13C0,R, SEE lpS rvWr Bi01e .B4 ACRES INC. RfW rn SrANrtS.muttFASEMENISr5AS A9 HEREwsETFORMAPE -~DRK 43 FONTIE VSEOF VUBIIC OOOtl:SaNO PRNATE O,RIA: - 1.910.15]3O0..FT. FT. ?.Z1 SW 1N UrMTIES 1uWNO MERIOMroSERYEINEARFw FacnPARCavlvwr+aN TmMav IPLAnasuBECrro OWANERK- 41,25ACRESIXC.RM G M_ . SLaCO COLWnaMIOWNRHW UwB RIAESAND zxi an, AYTNUE 01 $0. R. 0.E WETAHa3.uMUR, tOT&2E ACCESS wOOWALf, 1VI S+wE O C-1 !eel' Rnll roPARCEL ETOA BEFORE PIIRC1v4,IGOROEVEUJPRG ]CATS-11.25 AC. - S.BS AC. AVG. -n0 `m A~ ANVPARC0.oF VAa CONTACTTIE St. CRORtdwn SURVEYOR C7Z N 1,s zaNNBeFRCEANOAPRaPRRreroWNlaaROFOR m j SEC. 23, T28N, R18W PONDR,iIIAND SUBEANG.wc (.ll xcE iaeERTB vs swa ' NOTE NOOVmER OR RE9IOEMSHVLOONMMIO R101YE TIYT+&1)10 , VACH WdllO wrERFEPEwSHORCHa1gETR: FAN ni)M,T9 MINOFTHEAPwaVEOCOMRRHFm4YE WATER I II OMINME ANO SOIL ERO®a`F PLN1 FOR 1H9 PLAT. TE 9 xLY110E4 BUT 6 Npi UAEIEO ro BUADwO UPOn. OBSrFNCnNGALreww. FIWNa ORIXGVATa,a OT PLw I am'ORaINAGEMF SOREA4MENT3. I I I I wA1FA0RMNFAE OnLHE3 wartR RIMY/aYe. WAreRCULVERR, BBw5IX1OM555EEp,aS I IXUMT DRIVES LOCATED 01 25TH I I I I AVEWESHALLBEREMOVEDATTIME OF JOINT DRIVEWAY CONSTRUCTION a~II. SS3e15M3T 52ww BETWEEN LOT93 S4. I'+ I w,l+wRNfiR - - - - BECIaNa -~1 SBp',e1TEJ%&BF - - EIN WMER Y- IS _ S88'18'43'E 1202.29' R J sECrawa 25TH AVENUE L.~ seele,eE rzl).le rFArorFevusuc p stwveronscDrnFpA1E EAM.wESr v+LME . I,EUW,L. FIANUM, REGOrtREO VASCONRU LARD SURVEYOR HERFBYCFPRFY I iHaimfL4 t0AiUanCE WIrH rHEPR0.R9aNSOF CNaRlERaOpFTHE F I I 1 D WBCONSNSTATUTEB ANOUNOER 111E Ox6C1RN'IOG xURi CHR01ENSEN.OWNFA NI~ 4p 8 i 1 tl OFIK OESCRSEDONTHBRUT.IHavESURV 0, ONaEO ANDrA+PFED '4p ap q I a, Rp%1NG MEADOWS FAw4; THai SUCHPNTCORIECILY PEPRE9ENISlF1E IXrFAaR „ BauwAmESaw THE SUealRON aF rllfi Larvo sumErEO: ano nurTHa FUiIS LOGTEOIN PARYOFTN:NEU+Of 111E SE,/AW PNirGIrvE Sfi,/+GiME SE,/+ R,ro I.... ...I...... o<sficlpN w;raN,R,eW.rwma FAU OULE Sr. daN Cdwn.Wlscdlsw: nu MORE PARrx:lAAmrOESCNBEDAS FCUCws: mI BEGawwW AT M UKOFLOrOF OF E EASTCFAiWV+EO SUnhr Mw RBCCpaIEROF SAOOSECTnN a:FOFA wVOWMf15. IE. r,HCE SaP1eBJW. I i THEFUUE OF rHU OFSMa SECTW.lAE0J1FE TIE NORM i =i LwE PAGE,E2TAT I si.CWIXCOW,IY REGOiER OF OEEAR OFFICE: n1 .11. TBJW, ALONG NORTH LInE IJITSa FEET TO TNEw 11 F PMEET SFV+OF UK - UK,IE. IJ0,I rHE H M I C7~ I,J 1„ErvGE nOrv,m.JE aLONO La WEST ro TAE SOVM UK UNEOF rlIE I ]J EFTOF 9w0 SEV+OF THE SEII+: Ta:NCE50TAmE. AIANGSA050UM L PROPOSED! =I mE VDI FEETTO THE EAST UWEGT,E WESiwFEEf OFT,EEVB OFBE/,: I ' I Y' rHflvCENm•IOZJEALIXIO SAa EAST UNE. iJEOBI FEEiro HE FAST LOT 3 DRIVE <I LwE OF SaaaECnorr. THEnCE SSe,e+JS,xaNasan v, lYlfi.,zeaa Ffierrro xm LOT 2 ° 41 ZI rHEVarvraF BEpNNwc. oESCR•EO VaRCELwrnAR,s a.w ACRES U.a1,.,s)w, ~ mImJSO. Fr. LOT 1 ~ , I O rI ANOISSUBIECrrocoul+n TFUNx Hlwwar•aAND raAx RD.n mrH a ~ la.+oE SaFr. xwAaES COYF.NArITSOF ECOR0. aU.OTRiREASEMF,re. RESIRC xY,S ANO ISa)Sa A.: F LOT 4 01AroIFFS LEPTFMAIE6OEOpAM1N $ ^\I; PvNER3.WE HEREBY CERTFY TwTWE GUSEO THE-O-..00N tNE I ! I I U, I xnr oFrawNO MFAOaWSFanMTO eE SURUE`fio. aLroEO, wimEOAw W OEOIGreOAS REPPESENTEOON THEPUi.I AlRO CEPSIMTINirWS MT9 ~ I I REOLWF.D Br Sa010IX,3YW.IB TO BE SUB,eTreOLOTS FIXIOMNG FOR I sPRROVALg10Bk0ipN:Sr. CROI%COUMY PIAr1,B,LG Na ZONULO COMMftEE YS I I ~I AHO Me TOWNG WGALLE q9 •OW rniNE53 T,EHANO aNO SELLOF Y.OOWmE~T1R G - ~ I s &tl m,m I ~I tl I - - ~i 188YIBOE ■l+i I a rHE PRESENCE OF:a ~ ~ -0ROPOSED I I OWNERS ~I ~ DRIV I Rau} Aiw. c"niusmisn ~i rmV $ X MCE I m b S: ~ a.e I m ~I ELlABE1N LMiLSifNSEN I C i I ' C.WN OF ST. C- 12 I I "QQQt PEA v~ EBEFORE ME iM3 OAY OF 90B'lea?EJIB.,e I I UTCMFirFNSENaNp eiueErH Cmils LOT 8 'a BEIHE FE1LWx wla E%ECUrEOrFxi WRFfaW w3 AcxrvoWLeooED THESaME I ~ p °9~ I71 I C EI i ~3t1 " I m NOrNn .vascoNSw ~ i 2£SI I I ~ ~ ' welt $ ' 1I ; MrcoMMasan EYMRES w 3 I TrnFI eOARD RESautaN ~ ~ aze stln,J,: mnre a +la i LL$Q RESavsD.nar nx:PUroF ROwNO MFAnows FawAarHE rawNOF FAU CAVE OUTLOT 1 ee.tl J]~' ! %lR,i A EUUBEIN CHRSrEN3ENOWNE0.3, IS HEREBY O➢PROVEO BYIfff TOWN ~ I I I BOARD. I ~ 2®.Jn ff. I ! ~ I 'I 1 p -U---A4aillqiOWNC N- OuRArI M SEM ASA,Di ATA i M HAawM ogre " JOH I N 'A 908iNNEDFROM EMOIMNG~i ~ ~'I t11~ 'j I,HEREBYCERTR-IHEFOREO0w00ACOPl OFARROLUTI0NA0oP1E00Y ul ro `WSr' IS @ T,ET-NBO 0FTHEroAwacLUCaus. LOT 8 I i K aomB"° ES g I wti.li+u PFAiLr:FaNFi 0.EW-- uLrE -ACRES i' mA+ae sD. Fr. LB.O. ! rO.ATI iREA5URE115CER11MATE E%O- 110MENi H .O 1125A :PROPOSED I 9011M UNEOFTHENEV,Kn43Eln W` DRIVE I srArva wnssrar+swlsa S08°28'00E - - - - - - - - mHLwEa THESEU+aFTF1E SEln - 11~ ' .CRO°R 33.01' RIG rHF DULY ELECTED. gAN.wrtOaa aCRAO rOVrTI W S UK0FTK NORMb ' _daTv i~~FA~OF~i,1E ibNN OF Eau GUE HEREBr CERTFVTUrwACCORGNCE L'q _ FEETOF tHESEIn a•rNtselq L ~~'~T rN, w MV OFFICE, ixEPE ARE nOrwva101AxE90R SPECUL N ~ ~~I I ?5 9 IAFAOOwS FAW.t- ANf OF T,E LAUD wLLU0E0 WTNE p O H.W.L-112310 vxllYw PGVfl'.T]Irti1PFAWIPER- wre Z b4A tzro.J] I NS0e3T20-W 1311.59' 1 R. SesSrJSE lalt.sr! I Counrv rRFwBLwFnscsRTSrure I 6c 9 613L35rUffOl3D 9ML;If9QCT ROl4P Dal 506.9 P0. T I srarfiawluANSrnss D cwrm of sr. craw L CHERn -mO THEOULr.E1ECrEO. ouALUrEO aNOACrxa iRFASURDROF LEGEND I= 5. COU E D Ta% NnDOHEREBY CEPTFVTMTTHE RECOR09wnY OFFCE9rOW' FF aH0UNPAa TA%ESgiSPECDLASSES■A9EtSA90F I IW p UNREDEEMED S 110 AFFECrwG THE VNawcLU0FDw11,E %AI OF ROUNn C ' MFMO.YS FARM xxaD.wNRREFdIxo I ~ ~p~ • ron •Or+RPE wlx,o ~ I~ RHntt~ GTE al a v5 F a' ■ JY FpNREBN,FQMD sr.aaxcdwnwwMxoANB ZONBacroxwmEfi RESOLUiaH o y.•x lewa, Re•wsEr,wFJCVEMl m UBB PFA LmFNrf00T Fur of RauRaA,FA00ASFAiwwrHE TawHOF BAU L+ALIE I ImBIrLDINBO¢rBFpLUNE ~sEWWIFA xUllia Etl~H~pW91EN5EN.O.WIFASISHFAEBYAPAaVEp BYTHESr.fAOIX IR •><Oaa) PRflVUAY RFCCADEO MTA 000666"~~'SECRONa cOLxlix NaNFFFA AFp 2IXBrv3 COMMREE. vwafiununFA11BA•rt Jv+zOERe.cWn Gre SCALE IN FEET 1' = 100' PRDVOSfioawevartDGTON H.W.L - 1123,0 oweMeE PA.9FA~,Lf nOOFAi [iEx. CODE api.waSr'MTOR MiE 10 O 100 200 L____ -J YEIJLHpNwAIEALNEELP/a1aH H.W.L - tm LSO- SHEET 1 OF 1 SHEETS f SAFETY AND BUILDINGS DIVISION commerce.wi.gov Integrated Services Bureau 13 East Spruce Street INSPECTION REPORT Chippewa Falls, WI 54729 i sco ns i n www Rlce.s5172 i-2544 726-2544 Department of Commerce Date of Inspection: June 1, 2005 Plumber Name and Address: Project Name: Christensen Unknown 2 3 2005 Use: Residential Legal Description: NE, SE, 23, 28, 16W tXCvuNTY Site Number: Certified Soil Tester Name and FFr~~- Subdivision: Proposed CSM Lots 1- 8 Eli Gottfreid, CST 221981 Municipality: Town of "4ey PO Box 1645 County: St.Croix E~ Eau Claire WI 54702 Plan Transaction Number: 1024998 Owner Name and Address: Sanitary Permit Number: Kurt and Elizabeth Christensen 877 Benoy Rd Wastewater Flow: 450 gpd Hudson WI 54016 Persons Present: E. Gottfried w - p An onsite soils verification was conducted at the above referenced site as per district policy for all sites with less than four inches of unsaturated soil below the bottom of the.A horizon. The intent of this investigation is to confirm initial observations by the certified soil tester (CST) relating to the presence or absence of redoximorphic features in the A horizon and/or subsoil. In-situ soil texture, structure, and consistence factors were also reviewed as they relate to wastewater application rates. Other site conditions such as percent and direction of slope, landscape position, land surface contour length, and surface water hydrology may also be noted and their effects are factors considered in the recommendations and conclusions portion of this report. A typical soil profile for the areas evaluated on these two lost may be described as follows: Parcel 5 00-08" 10YR 3/2 sil, 2f-msbk, mfr, cw. No rmfs observed in A. 08-12" 10YR 4/3 sil (5% gr), 2mabk, mfr, w/ c1f 10YR 4/6 rmfs. I' Note: Locate mound 25 feet further west on contour than currently proposed. ~C Parcel 1 AKA Lor4 P,45'W-q q (v 0"_ ws~ sj~ At-() Wpund cLeS ~ 00-06" 10YR 3/2 sil, 2msbk, mfr, as.(us Z~ ~►2UZt~n~ S~ 06-15" 10YR 4/4 sicl, 1 mpl, mfr, w/ f2d 7.5YR 5/6 rmfs. Farm House Site - Currently Served By A Holding Tank --L07-3 Two soil borings were checked in an area southeast of the home. Redox features were observed in the A horizon in both soil borings. Soil saturation monitoring as per Comm 83.60(3) may be required at this site if additional does not reveal soils with no redox in the A horizon. If a mound system is designed to overcome limitations of a high level of seasonal soil saturation and slow permeability, the linear loading rate should not exceed 4.5 gpd/ft and the basal wastewater application rated should not exceed 0.2 gpd/ftz. Chisel plowing to a depth of 12 plus inches is recommended. The additional basal area will partially compensate for the gentle land slope and prevent wastewater leakage at the mound toe. At least.30 inches of sand lift is recommended when applying septic tank effluent to the distribution cell of the mound to ensure proper treatment. The longest portion of the mound must be orientated along the contour. The mound shall be constructed to divert surface water around the mound structure as much as possible. In addition, an up Safety and Buildings 10541 N RANCH ROAD commerce.wi.gov HAYWARD WI 54843 TDD (608) 264-8777 i sco n s i n ~.~mmerce.wi.gov/sb/ www.wisconsin.gov Department of Commerce EritE copy oyle, Governor C ■ Ma Burke, Secretary July 01, 2005 CUST ID No. 42258 ATTN: POWTS Inspector ELI M GOTTFRIED~ GOTTFRIED ENVIRONMENTAL ZONING OFFICE 124 1/2 GRAHAM AVE ST CROIX COUNTY SPIA PO BOX 1645 1101 CARMICHAEL RD EAU CLAIRE WI 54702-1645 HUDSON WI 54016 2 CONDITIONAL APPROVAL PLAN APPROVAL EXPIRES: 07/01/2007 Identification Numbers Transaction ID No. 1150506 SITE: Kurt & Elizabeth Christensen Site ID No. 700774 25TH Ave / Cth B R O / 'eadoW S RI'M Please refer to both' identification numbers, Town of Eau Galle, St Croix Cou* F1 aA- above, in all correspondence with the agency. SE 1/4, NW 1/4, S23, T28N, RI I W FOR: Object Type: Soil Saturation Determination Regulated Object ID No.: 1025852 The submittal described above has been reviewed for conformance with applicable Wisconsin Administrative Codes and Wisconsin Statutes. The submittal has been CONDITIONALLY APPROVED. The owner, as defined in chapter 101.01(10), Wisconsin Statutes, is responsible for compliance with all code requirements. The following conditions shall be met during construction or installation and prior to occupancy or use: 1. Approval is hereby granted pursuant to s. Comm 85.60(2), Wis. Adm. Code, to estimate the depth to seasonal soil saturation based on an interpretive determination process. Approval of the interpretive determination negates the requirement in s. Comm 85.30(2)(b), Wis. Adm. Code to designate the ground surface as the higest level of soil saturation when redoximorphic features are less than 4 inches below the bottom of the A horizon. 2. The estimated highest level of prolonged soil saturation approved under this determination is 6 inches below grade. At least 30 inches of sand lift on top of 6 inches of unsaturated, in-situ soil is required for adequate treatment and dispersal. 3. The basal soil application rate for the mound shall be 0.2 gpd/sf, and the linear loading rate 4.0 gpd/ft. 4. Chisel plowing to a depth of 12+ inches immediately prior to sand placement is required to improve vertical water movement into the soil solum. 5. Landscaping up slope of the mound shall be incorporated into the POWTS design to prevent surface water from concentrating along the up slope edge of the mound and to divert surface water drainage away from the system. 6. This approval shall remain valid unless the site is altered in such a way that the depth to soil saturation would change or if saturated conditions are observed for seven consecutive days at depths less than 3 feet below the infiltrative surface of the POWTS distribution component. 7. This approval in no way relinquishes the use of color patterns to estimate the depth to high. groundwater on any other parcels or portions of parcels. 8. A copy of this approval letter and attachments must accompany the mound system design for this site for purposes of plan approval and sanitary permit issuance. If the Interpretive Determination Report was accompanied with a plan and an expiration date is shown on this letter, the expiration date only applies to the plans for the design, not to the decision on the Interpretive Determination Report. ELI M GOTTFRIED Page 2 7/1/2005 A cop4of e ap r ov 1 ecifications and this letter shall be on-site during construction and open to inspec . e r tatives of the Department, which may include local inspectors. If plan index sheets were se y i a onal full plansets, a copy of this approval letter and index sheet shall be attached to plans that correspond with the copy on file with the Department. All permits required by the state or the local municipality shall be obtained prior to commencement of construction/installation/operation. In granting this approval the Division of Safety & Buildings reserves the right to require changes or additions should conditions arise making them necessary for code compliance. As per state stats 101.12(2), nothing in this review shall relieve the designer of the responsibility for designing a safe building, structure, or component. Inquiries concerning this correspondence may be made to me at the telephone number listed below, or at the address on this letterhead. Sincerely, Fee Required $ 100.00 Fee Received $ 100.00 Balance Due $ 0.00 s ater r Sp cia 'st Yroy G. ky, W4 Integrated Services Bureau WISMART code: 7633 (715)726-2544 Voice (715)726-2549 Fax Ijansky@conunerce.state.wi.us i GOTTFRIED ENVIRONMENTAL 124 Graham Ave., Eau Claire, Wl 54701; 715-833-1400 telephone: 715-833-1400; fax: 715-833-1381; email: eliestm(a),sbci1obal.net INTERPRETATIVE REPORT 1150506 P.O.W.T.S. June 15, 2005 Conditionally Proper owner: Kurt and Elizabeth Christensen APPROVED Legal Description: NE SE 23 28 16 W DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE Eau Galle, St. Croix County DIvist N OF SAFETY AND BUILDINGS SEE CO RESP DENCE INTRODUCTION Between 3 May and 1.3, May 2005, soil tests and evaluations were conducted by me on the property described above. The soil tests were done in response to a request by the property owner, Elizabeth Christensen, as part of the development of this parcel for residences. It is the intention of the property owners, Kurt and Elizabeth Christensen, to subdivide this 40 Acre portion of land into 6 parcels. Each parcel is intended to have 1 residence. RATIONALE FOR THE INTERPRETIVE REPORT High and low chroma features in the soil as compared with matrix soil colors are considered as indicators of seasonal saturation in the State of Wisconsin. Department of Commerce Comm 81.01 (118) states: "High groundwater" means zones of soil saturation which include perched water tables, shallow regional groundwater tables or aquifers, or zones that are seasonally, periodically or permanently saturated. Comm 81.01 (119) further defines evidence of seasonal saturation in the soils: "High groundwater elevation" means the higher of either the elevation to which the soil is saturated when observed as a free water surface, or the elevation to which the soil has been seasonally or periodically saturated as indicated by the highest elevation of redoximorphic features in the soils. At least 36 inches of soil separation is required between the bottom of the soil absorption system and the redoximorphic soil features in most types of soils (Table 83.44-3, Department of Commerce). Where this does not exist, an above ground SAS must be constructed (i.e. mound or At-Grade). The initial determination of this site has found the site to be unsuitable for mound type septic systems (Soil Absorption System), as per WAC Comm 85.30(2)(a) and (b). This code section mandates that: 1 1. Redoximorphic features be used as an indicator of seasonal saturation in the soils. 2. Redoximorphic features appearing at depths of within 4 inches of the bottom of the A horizon shall be interpreted as seasonal saturation occurring at ground surface ("Unless determined otherwise..., the highest elevation of seasonal soil saturation shall be the ground surface where redoximorphic features are present within 4 inches of the bottom of the A horizon.") Although Comm, 85.3.0(2)(b)'mandates that redoximorphic features within 4 inches of the A horizon be interpreted as seasonal saturation to ground surface, Comm 85.60(2)(x) allows for an interpretive determination of the soil conditions and depth to seasonal saturation should this condition exist. This section states in part: "A written report by a certified soil tester evaluating and interpreting redoximorphic soil features may bc'-submit~.uid'to`the°rlepartment-in lieu of high groundwater determination data. The written report shall`conclusively demonstrate that the existing soil morphological features or color patterns are not indicative of current conditions of periodic soil saturation." This is the basis for the current report. GEOLOGICAL HISTORY The subsurface formation in St. Croix County consists of the Prairie Du Chien Group (dolomite and sandy dolomite). Depth to bedrock ranges from 0 - 15 meters (Brown, B.A. (1988)). This formation is of Ordovician origin (Paleozoic era 425 mya). Dolomite appears to have been laid during the early Ordovician period, while the sandstone was laid during the late part of the period (Paull, R.K. and Paull, R.A. (1977)). Glaciation of St. Croix County occurred many times during the history of the earth, although the most recent glaciation, during the Pleistocene epoch (approximately 1 million to 10,000 years before present), is the most apparent. There were several stages of glacial advance, the most recent being the Wisconsinan stage. This was the result of the advance of the Superior Lobe and, from this, the Chippewa Lobe (Martin, L. (1965). The Physical Geology of Wisconsin. University of Wisconsin Press, Madison, Wisconsin). St. Croix County appears to be part of the geographical province of the Western Upland. As noted by Paull et al (Paull, R.K., R.A. Paull (1977) Geology of Wisconsin and Upper Michigan. Kendall / Hunt Publishing Company, Dubuque, IA), "The Paleozoic rocks are: the retreating erosional edges of marine sediments that once extended across the Northern Highland.... Late Cambrian seas washed over the Precambrian erosional surface to deposit more than 1,000 feet of sandstone, with minor amounts of interbedded dolomite." The St. Croix River has its origin in the Northern Highlands and its resistant Precambrian rock. The loess deposits in St. Croix County appear to be the result of the westerly winds carrying fine textured soils easterly to the eastern bluffs of the river and beyond. The soils observed on site suggest that the area has been influenced by glaciation. Soils appear to be loess (fine-textured, wind blown soil), underlain by glacial till. Loess, present as fine-textured silt and silt loam in the Ap horizon, may be the result of the influence of the wind-blown fines of 2 { the St Croix River floodplain. Four of the six lots on this parcel of land appear suitable for A+4 Mound type systems. Two parcels, however, identified as parcel 1 and parcel 5, are A+0 sites. These sites, however, do not have redoximorphic features in the A Horizon. DESCRIPTION OF THE SITE The parcel of land under investigation lays in the NE SE 23 28 16W, Eau Galle, St. Croix County. All land lays west of County Trunk Highway B and south of 25th Avenue. The land is composed of gently rolling hills with slopes ranging from 11% to 2.4% in the immediate areas of the mound systems. Landscape position of the mound systems plays a large part in the suitability of the soils on site. Mounds located on the tops of the hills have the deepest depth of suitable soil. These sites are A+4 sites (proposed parcels 2, 3, and 4). In addition to being at the highest points of the slopes for proposed parcels 3 and 4, the locations of these mound systems are on moderate slopes (8% and 11%, respectively). The siting of the mound for the proposed parcel 6 is located on a knoll at the bottom of the hill that lays along County Trunk Highway B. Sites located on the shoulders of the hills are A+0 sites (proposed parcels 1 and 5). This is consistent with the fact that soils on top of the hill receive the most moisture and the least amount of runoff. The greater the amount of precipitation percolating through the soil, the greater the soil development. Areas located on the shoulder of the hill will have more erosion and more surface runoff. The area immediately downslope of the parcel five mound is part of a back-slope and therefore has soils with redox features in the A horizon. Along Highway B, the area between proposed parcel 3 and 6 appears to be a slight depression in the landscape. This area may constitute a waterway. The Mounds located in proposed parcels 1 and 5 may have soils that are influenced by water movement along the tops of the dense glacial till. This may be a factor in contributing to the presence of redox features immediately below the A horizon. SOIL MAPPING OF THE AREA The soils in the proposed mound site are identified as Vlasaty series soil (VaB) according to the Soil Survey of St. Croix County, published by the Natural Resource Conservation Service of the U.S. Department of Agriculture. These soils are described as being "moderately well-drained soils on low ridges and knolls of ground moraines." They are further described as having been "formed in silty sediment and in the underlying clay loam till." Taxonomically, this soil series is classified as Glossaquic Hapludalfs. On-site evaluation of the soils on this site is in agreement with the published soils data for the site. As noted in the accompanying soil reports, the proposed mound areas were found to have a silt loam topsoil and subsoil and a clay loam parent material. With regards to the two A+0 mound sites, redoximorphic features were found in either the Bt horizon (silty clay loam) (7 to 12 inches below grade) or the E horizon. In the case of the mound site for proposed parcel 1, redox features were also found in the Ap2 horizon in the pit furthest downslope of the bed site. The fact that evidence of seasonal saturation was found at 7 to 12 inches warrants the classification of the soil as aquic. Note that the proposed mound sites for 3 parcels 2, 3, 4 and 6 do not have aquic soil conditions. As noted above, the fact that the mound sites on proposed parcels 2, 3, 4, and 6 are not aquic can be attributed to either land position or slope, or a combination of the two. The proposed mound for parcel 3 is located on the highest part of the East portion of the 40-acre parcel. Likewise, the mound on parcel 2 is located on the highest point of the West portion of the 40-acre parcel. In addition, the slopes on the proposed mound sites for parcels 3 and 4 are 11 % and 8%, respectively. Therefore, these parcels are well-drained, due to land position. Parcel 6 is located on a knoll in the midst of an overall toe slope on the east portion of the 40-acre parcel. Waterways are located to the north south, and west of the proposed parcel 6 mound site. LOCAL HYDROLOGY As noted on the accompanying plot plan and topographic map for this area, this 40-acre parcel consists of rolling hills interspersed with waterways. The proposed mound sites are located on the upslopes of the waterways. Land along County Trunk Highway B slopes primarily to the south. As noted above, parcels 2, 3, 4 and 6 are suitable for A+4 mounds. Parcels 1 and 5 are suitable for mound systems, but have a soil profile in which there is no separation between the bottom of the A Horizon and the start of redox features of greater than 4 inches. General surface flow is towards the interspersed drainageways. Primary drainageways appear to be between parcels 3 and 6, with water moving from east to west and between parcels 1 and 4, with water moving from north to south. Regional flow may be west towards the St. Croix River. The topographic maps consulted for this report do not indicate any wetland areas in the vicinity of the proposed mound dispersal systems. No naturally occurring areas of standing water were observed in the area of the proposed mound POWTS. SIGNIFICANCE OF REPORTED SOIL CONDITIONS AND SURFACE WATER FLOW General surface water flow in the area may be primarily vertical for the first 7 to 12 inches (approximately) as a result of the relatively permeable upper horizons. Permeability is moderately slow in the subsoil and is most likely perching above the dense silty clay loam and clay loam subsoil layers. Most recent use of the land is as a farm field. Soils appear to have good structure in the upper horizons. Thus, water flows uninhibited through the A horizon. Water flow through the E horizon is slightly impeded due to the weakly platey structure. Here, redox features are faint. Water flow is also slightly impeded in the Bt horizon where structure is weak. Again, in some areas, the redox features are faint. In other areas, redox features are distinct. Within the C horizon, structure is massive. Here, redox features are distinct to prominent. In the Ap horizon, and slightly into the subsoil (Bt I), a moderate amount of worm channels were observed (not reported in soil report). This suggests that the upper horizons are aerated enough to support aerobic organisms. As noted by Brady and Weil (1990) (Brady, N.C. and Weil, R.R. The Nature and Properties of Soils I P Ed, Prentice Hall Upper Saddle River, N.J. p. 463), "Earthworms prefer a moist, but well-aerated environment. They do not live under anaerobic 4 conditions..." Roots and root channels were also present in the 0 to 10" (approximate) range of the soil profile. Soil colors as noted by this soil tester were l OYR 3/2 in the Ap horizon except for parcel 5 where the soil color in the Ap horizon was l OYR 2/2. The I OYR 3/2 soil color is indicative of a more well-aerated soil, as opposed to the darker, more l OYR 2/1 soil color of an organic topsoil. The darker soil color in the Ap horizon of parcel 5 here may have been a reflection of the weather conditions for the day that the soils were evaluated. The day of 17 May, the sky was overcast with periods of rain. Soil color in the Bt horizon was l OYR 4/4 to I OYR 5/3. These colors are representative of normal subsoil color. Gleyed soils are generally in the range of l OYR 5/2 to IOYR 6/2. The lack of redoximorphic features, the lighter (10YR 3/2) colors in the Ap horizon and the non-gleyed colors in the subsoil indicate that soils in the immediate vicinity of pits observed well-aerated and are not saturated for more than 7 consecutive days. No puddled or massive soils were observed in the area of the proposed SAS's to a depth to the bottom of the Bt 1 horizon. With regards to the A+0 sites, close inspection of the Ap horizon did not indicate the presence of redoximorphic features. This suggests that although there is not an A+4 situation, there is adequate depth in the A horizon (approximately 7 inches) to maintain a suitable distance between the bottom of the SAS and the limiting factor and thus to allow for the placement of a mound SAS as per code. HIST/C SOILS Keys to Soil Taxonomy (1994) defines a histic epipedon as follows: It consists of organic soil material if the soil has not been plowed. If the soil has been plowed, the epipedon normally has a high content of organic matter The histic epipedon either has aquic conditions for some time in most years or has been artificially drained." The Keys to Soil Taxonomy defines aquic conditions as: "those [soils] which currently experience continuous or periodic saturation and reduction.... Saturation is characterized by zero or positive pressure in the soil-water and can generally be determined by observing free water in an unlined auger hole." In neither the auger holes nor in the shallow hand-dug pits was standing water observed in the epipedon. In addition, soil colors in the epipedon were not those characteristic of organic soils (1OYR 2/2). Vepraskas (1996) points out 3 possible redoximorphic conditions: 1. Redox depletions around macropores and redox concentrations within the matrix; 2. Redox concentrations around macropores and redox depletions within the matrix; 3. Combination of the 2 conditions. Each of the 3 conditions has a unique etiology. Condition 1 will occur, according to Vepraskas, in situations where there is perching above a dense and slowly permeable layer. Such appears to be the condition described on the site outlined in this report. However, redox depletions were not observed in the macropores in the Ap horizon or in the BtI horizon of pits 6 and 7. In pit 8, redox features were observed in the macropores of horizon of horizon Btl. 5 CONCLUSIONS No redoximorphic features were observed for at least 7 inches of the Ap horizon in any of the pits evaluated. The soils in this upper 7 inches appeared to be well aerated with the presence of roots and worm channels. Water movement therefore appears to take place in this upper layer and there does not appear to be a condition of ponding for any significant period of time in this upper layer. The slope is approximately 9%, suggesting that water moves laterally away from the sites. Features of This Site The four A+4 mound sites in this 40 acre parcel are all either on the highest points in their respective locations or are on moderately steep slopes or both. This allows for adequate water movement through the soils and for a suitable amount of soil development. The two sites in which interpretive reports are required (A+0 sites) are the sites located on back-slopes. Even though the sites are located on back-slopes, there is adequate slope to the sites (approximately 5%) to allow for water movement through the soils and away from the mound sites. Sites on the 40 acre parcel that are unsuitable for the placement of mound systems are located in waterways or on foot-slopes. PROPOSALS This soil tester feels that a mound systems on the A+0 sites on this 40 acre parcel would adequately provide effluent treatment and dispersal as long as the follows design conditions are implemented: 1. The construction of the soil absorption systems must be in the area designated on the plot plans. 2. Areas lower in the landscape must not be used for soil absorption systems. 3. The distribution cell must be designed very long and narrow with a linear loading rate less than 4.0 gpd/ft. This may limit the number of bedrooms and / or occupancy that can be serviced on the site. 4. At least 2.50 feet of ASTM C-33 sand must be used under the laterals for the proposed system. 5. Maximum hole spacing in laterals must be 30 inches. 6. Slopes around the mound must be 1:4 rather than the traditional 1:3 to increase the toe absorption area. 7. The area upslope of the proposed SAS must be provided with a constructed waterway to divert water around the mound. The purpose of the waterway will be to prevent water from being trapped in the mound. 6 If you have any questions regarding this report, please feel free to contact me at the above address and/or telephone number. Sincerely, Eli M. Gottfried Registered Sanitarian (80806), CST (221981), Licensed Designer (1310) I 7 SrA r ~~Hy7 [~i Al } 'QR7~7 n Y{ + , ~ y ~T~ v ,~t~. lab SrA Sac? S jT~~ AmD2 A r 9 . FOB AuJ d . r JaSrA z ^~a Ya6 rSYr` w 1 , FOC Ilk~ AoE3 'y3 n 1 + r *{r Approx. location of proposed mounds VaB Mal~ O,B vae z}6A r ~ y , t ~ • f ~i Sl A 't YA Arrow points to the approximate location of the proposed mounds. The soil series maps indicate that this is Vlasaty series soil with a slope of 12-20%. Proposed mounds are located on slopes ranging from 2.4% to 11%. The mounds classified as A+0 mounds are located on approximate back slopes with the slopes of approximately 5%. 8 4 UV l c 12 Arrow points to approximate location of proposed mound systems. Mounds are located upslope of the waterways. The mounds sites with A+4 soil conditions exist on slopes of 8 to 11% and / or are located at the highest land position. Mounds qualifying for A+0 condition are found on the back-slopes. Sites that do not qualify for mounds are located in waterways or at the foot- slope land positions. 9 SAFETY AND BUILDINGS DIVISION commerce.wi.gov Integrated Services Bureau 13 East Spruce Street ■ Chippewa Falls, WI 54729 ti scosin INSPECTION REPORT wwwcommerce.state.wi.us/sb epartment 090m fllerC6 (775) 726-2544 Date of Inspection: June 1, 2005 Plumber Name and Address: Project Name: Christensen Unknown Use: Residential Legal Description: NE, SE, 23, 28, 16W Site Number Certified Soil Tester Name and Address: Subdivision: Proposed CSM Lots 1 - 8 Eli Gottfreid, CST 221981 Municipality: Town of Pleasant Valley PO Box 1645 County: St.Croix Eau Claire WI 54702 Plan Transaction Number. 1024998 Owner Name and Address: Sanitary Permit Number: Kurt and Elizabeth Christensen 877 Benoy Rd Wastewater Flow: 450 gpd Hudson WI 54016 Persons Present: E. Gottfried An onsite soils verification was conducted at the above referenced site as per district policy for all sites with less than four inches of unsaturated soil below the bottom of the A horizon. The intent of this investigation is to confirm initial observations by the certified soil tester (CST) relating to the presence or absence of redoximorphic features in the A horizon and/or subsoil. In-situ soil texture, structure, and consistence factors were also reviewed as they relate to wastewater application rates. Other site conditions such as percent and direction of slope, landscape position, land surface contour length, and surface water hydrology may also be noted and their effects are factors considered in the recommendations and conclusions portion of this report. A typical soil profile for the areas evaluated on these two lost may be described as follows: Parcel 5 00-08" 10YR 3/2 sil, 2f-msbk, mfr, cw. No rmfs observed in A. 08-12" 10YR 4/3 sil (5% gr), 2mabk, mfr, w/ c1f 10YR 4/6 rmfs. Note: Locate mound 25 feet further west on contour than currently proposed. i Parcel 1 00-06" 10YR 3/2 sil, 2msbk, mfr, as. 06-15" 10YR 4/4 sicl, 1 mpl, mfr, w/ f2d 7.5YR 516 rmfs. Farm House Site - Currently Served By A Holding Tank Two soil borings were checked in an area southeast of the home. Redox features were observed in the A horizon in both soil borings. Soil saturation monitoring as per Comm 83.60(3) may be required at this site if additional does not reveal soils with no redox in the A horizon. If a mound system is designed to overcome limitations of a high level of seasonal soil saturation and slow permeability, the linear loading rate should not exceed 4.5 gpd/ft and the basal wastewater application rated should not exceed 0.2 gpd/fe. Chisel plowing to a depth of 12 plus inches is recommended. The additional basal area will partially compensate for the gentle land slope and prevent wastewater leakage at the mound toe. At least 30 inches of sand lift is recommended when applying septic tank effluent to the distribution cell of the mound to ensure proper treatment. The longest portion of the mound must be orientated along the contour. The mound shall be constructed to divert surface water around the mound structure as much as possible. In addition, an up 10 Page 2 of 2 June 1, 2005 Christensen Property I slope drainage ditch should be considered if it is determined that surface or subsurface hydrology is improved by intercepting water and diverting it away from the mound site. If there are any questions regarding this report, please contact me. ~ a.-& eioy G. ns y, W water ZE ialist Ljansky omme tate.wi.-m ail 715/726-2544 Voice 715/726-2549 Fax cc: County ❑ Plumber ® CST ❑ Owner ❑ Other i I I II I I ICI 11 REFERENCES 1. Brady, N.C. and Weil, R.R. The Nature and Properties of Soils 13th Ed, Prentice Hall Upper Saddle River, N.J. p. 463 2. Brown, B.A. (1988) Bedrock Geology of Wisconsin (Brown 1988, University of Wisconsin - Extension 3. Havholm, K. G. (1998) Pre-Quaternary Geological History of Western Wisconsin with an Emphasis on the Cambrian Sandstones: Tri-State/University of Wisconsin System Geological Field Conference, pages 3-14. 4. Martin, L. (1965). The Physical Geology of Wisconsin. University of Wisconsin Press, Madison, Wisconsin 5. Paull, R.K. and Paull, R.A. (1977) Geology of Wisconsin and Upper Michigan. Kendall/Hunt Publishing Company, Dubuque, IA. 6. National Audubon Society Field Guide to North American Trees (Eastern Region): (1998) Chanticleer Press Inc., NY, NY 7. Soil survey of St Croix County (1978). United States Dept of Agriculture Soil Conservation Service and Research Division of the College of Agriculture and Life Sciences, University of Wisconsin. 8. Syverson, K. M. (1998) Glacial History of Western Wisconsin in Tri-State/University of Wisconsin System Geological Field Conference, pages 15-28 9. Vepraskas, M. (1996) Redoximorphic Features for Identifying Aquic Conditions. North Carolina Research Service. North Carolina State University. Raleigh, North Carolina. Technical Bulletin 301. 12