HomeMy WebLinkAbout008-2017-05-000
Wisconsin Department of Commerce SOIL AND SITE EVALUATION Page I Of
Division of Safety and Buildings 'n a rda wi omin 85, Wis. Adm. Code
Attach complete site plan on paper not less than 8 '/2 x 1 inc nclude, but County St. Croix
not limited to: vertical and horizontal reference point (BM), direction and percent slope, s r
dimensions, north arrow, and location and distance to the nearest road. ORIGINAL Parcel ID #00- 2011- d S-OCV
APPLICANT INFORMATION - Please print all information Reviewed By: Date:
Personal information you provide may be used for secondary purposes (Privacy Law, s. 15.04(1)(m)). Q~ - 5
Property owner: r.~. Property
location
Kurt and Elizabeth Christensen APR 2 - Gov't lot: NE 1/4 SE 1/4 S23 T 28 N, R16 (or
Property owner's mailing address: Lot # Block # Subd. Name or CSM#
855 B enoy Road R'1x+NNfNG & ZONING Oh- 5 NA bi~r C
City / State / Zip Code Phone number:
city Village Town Nearest Road
Hudson / Wisconsin /54016 715-386-6340 Eau Galle 25Th Avenue
® New Construction Use ❑ Residential/Number of bedrooms Unknown Addition to existing building: NA
❑ Replacement ❑ Public or commercial - describe
Code Design Flow Rate: Unknown - must be appropriate size for the contour and soil restrictions
Parent Material: Glacial Till - ground moraine
General Comments and Recommendations: Soils are poorly drained glossoboralfs underlain by very dense gravely silty clay loam. Redox features are
the result of perching above the dense sandy loam layer. A long narrow mound SAS is recommended for this site with 2.50 feet of sand fill.
SOIL DESCRIPTION REPORT
Boring # Horizon Depth Dominant Redox Description Texture Structure Consistence Boundary Roots Soil Application Rate
in. Munsell Color Qu. Sz. Cont. Color Gr. Sz. Sh. GPD/FT2
Pit 11 Effl1 Eff#2
Apl 0-6 l OYR 2/2 NA sil 2msbk mfr aw 2f 0.6 0.8
Ground A 2 6-9 10YR 2/2 mld 7.5YR 5/8 sil Imsbk mfr cw if 0.4 0.6
Elev (ft.) p
88.94 E 9-13 l OYR 4/3 m3d 7.5YR 5/8 sil lmpl mfr aw NA 0.2 0.3
Depth to Bt 13-14 IOYR 5/3 map 7.5YR 5/8 sicl Imsbk mfr NA NA 0.2 0.3
limiting
factor- in.
0
Remarks: redox features present in root channels in Ap2 horizon
Boring # Ap 1 0-6 l OYR 2/2 NA sil 2msbk mfr aw 2f 0.6 0.8
Ptt 12 Ap2 6-11 1OYR 2/2 m I d 7.5YR 5/8 sil tmpl mfr cw if 0.4 0.6
E 11-13 IOYR 4/3 m3d 7.5YR 5/8 sit Impl mfr aw NA 0.4 0.6
Ground
Elev (ft.) Bt 13-14 IOYR 5/3 m3p 7.5YR 5/8 sicl Imsbk mfr NA NA 0.2 0.3
87.68
Depth to
limiting
factor- in.
0
Remarks:
CST Name: Eli M. Gottfried, Gottfried Environmental Signature: Tel. No. 715-833-1400
Address: 124-1/2 Graham Ave. Eau Claire, WI. 54701 Date: 17 May 2005 CST # 221981
SOIL DESCRIPTION REPORT
Property owner Christensen Parcel ID#
Boring # Horizon Depth Dominant Redox Description Texture Structure Consistence Boundary Roots Soil Application Rate
in. Munsell Color Qu. Sz. Cont. Color Gr. Sz. Sh. GPD/FTZ
Eff# 1 Eff#2
Pit 13
Apl 0-7 1OYR 2/2 NA sit F 2msbk mfr aw 2f 0.6 0.8
Ground s
Elev (ft.) Apt 7-10 lOYR 2/2 mld 7.Sr~I~"5f sit~-'~ lmsbk mfr cw if 0.4 0.6
88.29 E 10-13 l OYR 4/3 m3d 7.5YR 5/8 sil Imp] mfr aw NA 0.2 0.3
Depth to Bt 13-16 IOYR 5/3 m3p 7.5YR 5/8 sicl lmsbk mfr NA NA 0.2 0.3
limiting
factor- in.
0
Remarks:
Boring # Horizon Depth Dominant Redox description Texture Structure Consistence Boundary Roots Soil Application Rate
in. Munsell Color Qu. Sz. Cont. Color Gr. Sz. Sh. GPD/FT2
Eff# 1 Eff#2
Ground
Elev (ft.)
Depth to
limiting
factor-in.
Remarks:
Boring #
i
Ground
Elev (ft.)
Depth to
limiting
factor- in.
Remarks:
Boring # Horizon Depth Dominant Redox description Texture Structure Consistence Boundary Roots Soil Application Rate
GPD/FT2
in. Munsell Color Qu. Sz. Cont. Color Gr. Sz. Sh.
Eff# 1 Eff#2
I
Ground
Elev (ft.)
Depth to
limiting
factor- in.
Remarks:
Wisconsin Depdrtment of Commerce SOIL AND SITE EVALUATION Page Of
Division of Safety and Buildings
in accordance with Comm 85, Wis. Adm. Code
Attach complete site plan on paper not less than 8 '/1 x 11 inches in size. Plan must include, but County St. Croix
not limited to: vertical and horizontal reference point (BM), direction and percent slope, scale or
dimensions, north arrow, and location and distance to the nearest road. Parcel 1D #
0OY- Zoe 7- OS-cOD
APPLICANT INFORMATION - Please print all information Reviewed By: Date:
Personal information you provide may be used for secondary purposes (Privacy Law, s. 15.04(1)(m)). 't L E C P Y S40:t d kj S I
Property owner: Property location
Kurt and Elizabeth Christensen Gov't lot: NE 1/4 SE 1/4 S23 T 28 N, RI6 E (orR
Property owner's mailing address: Block # Subd. Name or CSM#
855 Benoy Road NA NA_
City / State / Zip Code Phone number lodtck of-
city Village Town Nearest Road
city
Hudson / Wisconsin /54016 715-386-6340 Eau Galle 25`h Avenue El New Construction Use Residential/Number of bedrooms Unknown Addition to existing building:
NA
13 Replacement ❑ Public or commercial - describe
Code Design Flow Rate: Unknown - must be appropriate size for the contour and soil restrictions
Parent Material: Glacial Till - ground moraine
General Comments and Recommendations: Soils are poorly drained glossoboralfs underlain by very dense gravely silty clay loam. Redox features are
the result of perching above the dense sandy loam layer. A long narrow mound SAS is recommended for this site with 2.50 feet of sand fill.
SOIL DESCRIPTION REPORT
Boring # Horizon Depth Dominant Redox Description Texture Structure Consistence Boundary Roots Soil Application Rate
in. Munsell Color Qu. Sz. Cont. Color Gr. Sz. Sh. GPD/FTZ
P, Effi# 1 Eff#2
No 5 Apl 0-6 10YR 2/2 NA sil 2msbk mfr aw 217 0.6 0.8
Ground Ap2 6-9 10YR 2/2 m I d 7.5YR 5/8 sil Imsbk mfr cw 1f 0.4 0.6
Elev (ft.)
8=4 E 9-13 IOYR 4/3 m3d 7.5YR 5/8 sil lmpl mfr aw NA 0.2 0.3
Depth to Bt 13-14 IOYR 5/3 m3p 7.5YR 5/8 sicl Imsbk mfr NA NA 0.2 0.3
limiting
factor- in.
0
Remarks: redox features present in root channels in Ap2 horizon
Boring # Ap 1 0-6 l OYR 2/2 NA sil 2msbk mfr aw 2f 0.6 0.8
Ptt Ap2 6-11 1OYR 2/2 mld 7.5YR 5/8 sil Impl mfr cw if 0.4 0.6
Ground E 11-13 1OYR 4/3 m3d 7.5YR 5/8 sil Impl mfr aw NA 0.4 0.6
Elev (ft.) Bt 13-14 IOYR 5/3 m3p 7.5YR 5/8 sicl lmsbk mfr NA NA 0.2 0.3
87.68
Depth to
limiting
factor- in.
0 a
Remarks:
CST Name: Eli M. Gottfried, Gottfried Environmental Signature: + A- Tel. No. 715-833-1400
Address: 124-1/2 Graham Ave. Eau Claire, WI. 54701 Date: 17 May 2005 CST # 221981
SOIL DESCRIPTION REPORT
Toperty owner Christensen Parcel ID#
Boring # Horizon Depth Dominant Redox Description Texture Structure Consistence Boundary Roots Soil Application Rate
in. Munsell Color Qu. Sz. Cont. Color Gr. Sz. Sh. GPD/FTZ
Pit 13 Eff# 1 Eff#2
Apl 0-7 IOYR 2/2 NA sil 2msbk mfr aw 2f 0.6 0.8
Ground A 2 7-10 10YR 2/2 mld 7.5YR 5/8 sil Imsbk mfr cw If 0.4 0.6
Elev (ft.) p
88.29 E 10-13 IOYR 4/3 mad 7.5YR 5/8 sil Impl mfr aw NA 0.2 0.3
Depth to Bt 13-16 10YR 5/3 m3p 7.5YR 5/8 sicl Imsbk mfr NA NA 0.2 0.3
limiting
factor- in.
0
Remarks:
Boring # Horizon Depth Dominant Redox description Texture Structure Consistence Boundary Roots Soil Application Rate
in. Munsell Color Qu. Sz. Cont. Color Gr. Sz. Sh. GPD/FT2
EMI Eft#2
Ground
Elev (ft.)
Depth to
limiting
factor-in.
Remarks:
I
Boring #
Ground
Elev (ft.)
Depth to
limiting
factor- in.
Remarks:
Boring # Horizon Depth Dominant Redox description Texture Structure Consistence Boundary Roots Soil Application Rate
in. Munsell Color Qu. Sz. Cont. Color Gr. Sz. Sh. GPD/FT2
Eff# 1 Eff#2
Ground
Elev (R)
Depth to
limiting
factor- in.
Remarks:
am
m u o o n o
-nm
c n a o n
$'o1 mme
mom n c..
e N1O W LL s
N ~a ~a
m o ~ m tim m
~a m°-~
bN I
o
J - a I i m
z 1 E
Y H
c m U c N -
m N m y B V S V N
UZ W H= `1^1
1• m- ~ ~ I
'El o
m III
oS m
15 -A~
am _
aa! mW ~ I
p om a
/ n
/
a I11
m ° 1
ai
FINAL PLAT OF:
ROLLING MEADOWS FARM LOCATION SKETCH
LOCATED IN PART OF THE NE1/4 OF THE SE1/4 AND PART OF THE SE7/4 OF THE SE7/4 OF
SECTION 23, T28N, R1 6W, TOWN OF EAU GALLE, ST. CROIX COUNTY, WISCONSIN.
Nww NEw P
unuw FASD. n g
No FaEOR•nEOUaES.REro%PVOEO9UCN $
nNr nlE wSTNUiONRWIOOISNII5RN1'SURYEr p mM AvH9R
srARE a+ourwlcrw9oNALwcwnLOrweaR PREPARED FOR: N X47 F
STREEitINE 1HE p91URBANLEOPA 9MNErsfKE BY OlSf eELOASE1NCWm1•SIER TOTALPMCELAREA:
NNprcISAYIOUiION OFSFCraNZ,e.satwscor■N en N . 9.~
STANTEE U}eltt6LSFMDIiSABNE%Nl SETFORMKE nABd4 r9>,we 93.99 ACRES INC. RrVI Q(") IT !Ee
WRiHEU%a NeLIL 900ls MOPrwAiE Fr9UC 1.919.157SO.Fr. Z_ A yw, ~N
uw.iiES HRVwo THE nOHrro%RrEnEMiEn OWNER
Z
-MANI- 91.25ACRESElC.RlW Q %
EA,cHPNtcEL•ewN ON n9sNK n...nasusiECrlo net miN9LD9m G) X
srnrE OpuNry KOi0wN9far uws NnE N+0 1.797.10180. Fr. s
rwxs o.E. rrtnANax rweNw lArs~,NCCE% waowuewson O n r-e 2Z
m PKCEL Ero.eEFORE RuRCH9siNO oR oEVD.onNo
iM;riNE Si. rpgx Crltmtt SURVEYOR ]LOTS °91.25 AG- 5.58 AC. AVG. TC N rn ""E
mNeOOFFICENNKPRL`PR.rE iOM190.0ROFOR EOAW FVMN.1 m O
Not+cE uonrHw+osuRra I9.wO m < O SEC. 23, T28N, R18W
P.O.SOSu
ROepi,gwr 3.@S
NorE: NoomIEROR RESroENr9«LLOOMrrrr•.c PNrnIE nsNSme
NHCH w0M01NTNFEPE WIrNORCNRNGE LNE PMI r1fE161119 '
oPERAmN or THe APPROrEO cawmErm+sNE wAnR
pWNROE Nq 9QLER09ON P1A,IFOHTH9PUr. M9
W LL1pE3 BUi U NOr UM%O i0 BIA W A 1IP011.
OBSTRUCwIG. K1FRNq RLLRlO. OR EXGYNMNGOq I I I I
PI.wrPq wNYl OP9YYGE PRF SOR EVfMENis.
wRTER ONPIFiEF pICHe9, vMTER RUfN9Y9, WNTERI
Luv nrs, eERwaa ow vs%Ewros.
~I~~naG\11 I~Q®~ EXISTING DRIVES LOCATED ON 25TH I I I I
AVENUE SHALL BE REMOVED AT TIME
OF MINT DRIVEWAY CONSTRUCDON
SSV1B'93•E 5250.98 BETWEEN LOTS 3 Y 9.
ww CORNEA -
25TH AVENUE S88'1 8'43'E 1282.29'
T q I 'a
- -
stxM1EroRSCERrIFOeiE PAS. rhsrww+E I serte.se lnr.I9 smanrmrorle R.asc p
LEOwwcFLwIM.FEOariEREOwnmNSNtANO SURUErox, HERESrcEAm ,I _ .__.__.__.__.r ._i.__.
THRTNPUUCONFURNCE Vnm mEPwvmoNS OF CH.PrEA moarHE w I i ~Iyv ~ S I
I
w~scaawsuiuTES.Mro uNOER mE wRECTana RURrctw¢,Ex%w, owxR > Qo ; i
aF,HE wnaESCReeooNlHrs RAr.irom swNErEO. orvroEOMmMrPPPn 's0 c i I m I
ROLLwG E1F Fuw:,N9r sNCHFUrcaroacilr RESREEExisrNE ExrEHOn~p 6 - e5
BOMOAREBNA iNE SUBDm90NWTHElANO SUINEYEO.NVO AWTIIq 9 q
J.... I I j
LCCAiep iN FMw OPTHE NEw OF RE 9Ew UIDPKTOF INE%w Pn,E5FU9 g,I~ 1.... ...I...... ~
a%cTUNm:,mN,RUN.Tmm,aPEAUORUESr.croacaLNn,wrsca+sN: I mi I
EAU NORE FMAIanARLr oescRreEOARFOUONa I ❑ St .
511E5 I a
Ai TI9; EAST V9 CORNEROf 540 %C TON Zk iNENCE£av,gew.`
N.oia rHE EAnLNEOC rHE%v. of S.ro sECraN~.ee.si F,;ETroiHExoRm i I =
uNE a Loi ~ v cER,ciEO su,rver Euv RECORDED wvauNE Ie. PN%9nr,Lr
rHE Si. CROEt COIAIIY %GSTER OF OEFAB OFFICE: ,HENCE NEe-JT}p W. µpNO
eMD NORn1 LINE. Inlt3v FEET i0 THE wEBftNEOF SW %V96r1E %Vl
,NENCS,an,mTE ALOw sMawFSr urlE.IxioPEErrori9;swmuNEaP,r~E ~ « ' I D~ .
N011M Be FEETpP 9Mp%w OF ME%tN; 1HfxLE SeTaImE.MANG 3M030U,N : PROPOSED!
Ilet FFEr i0 ME EMiT LwE IFr11Ewe5in FEET OFnrt EI20P1NE%W:
rNfnCE NSV,mrE. uoNO mro F95r uNE lmwiFEErro,HE EAST-wFSrw LOT3 OWE 3 AI Y
SMO BECTON: AIENCESMtB9YE.MANGBNO W uNE I2B2.n FFSrro PORF9
iiE roiNroP eEGwmo. oESCReeo PNicELCONrMNS9sw M;RESIrBIl.lsi sa. ,ei;ms so. FT. LOPT2 LOT 1 jI
FT.IMOcevslFCr rO CdNttrGlrM Hx;HwAra NwrowN roAOOS,H ~f y
CWF-)rPwISOF ECOR0. ALL OMERP %NFNTS PESIRO,ONSF9 I I b n.+ Ip.NB 50.Ff. I~F~pEg I ~ g~g' I ¢i
LOT 4 m
n e%ES
OWNERS CERIiONEE OF DEOeAttX1 ~ I y~ mt. W.Ff. g ~ I j~
o;
KOMIER3. wEIlEREBr LERriFr l,ur WE CM15E91HE WOLfSLNRFAON „E ~ (JI
Rnra ROLLP,o MFAAOA'sFKNio eE wRVErEO, ar9eo..v~FFEnnw ~ I i 1 i U; I
oEauTEOAR REPRE%NrEOON THE NAr.IUSO CER,BrTIUV rlesRATR
REOUREOwszminaR SZm.IZ ro eE SUwariw ro,rE FIXtDNn1L FOR ~ u ,
KmaFALaROeEC10N: sr cRax cawttRANw.oaamNwcawnneE ~ I I
Rr+D TttE ,O W N a E.w OaAE.
vnrNESS rNEM9NOMN SEM.a sMOawERS,HS_wroP ~ ~ i 4I I
- ~I i o G
74
iN rHE PRESPrcEap 0 041 m,
1
OWNERS ~ R
;UnlcHws EM¢N I N 8 eR.^E I M
O1
EumeEix ctiasrelSE« I o ? a.s I I a
srnre of % 2
0
cOUNtt orsr: cROni I P I
%en59TF3Ix9z F!
FeuoNULr GME eFFORF NE rNis_ wra_. I i t7
<EOVE NRNEn Nmrct~,ENSENKro eLVA%TN CNns LOTS
II
iHE PERBONwIO F%ECOTEO1NE fOREGOeOw SAMAf9 Y'
%
Q 9l
AaNVNLEOCEO THESRNE ,.i~j: wLB an PT. i
_ ~ IIw I
LN9N ~
MrLLtMNB~N~wR% W ~ I i ~
Ia
,INNBWPO iIE50.OnON I ~ r A Tf - ..}}1~.~ y
lair F,
RESaw;o.rNRrrNE FUra RCUINO NEPOpvs PMwwrHE rowN OF FAU C.uE OUTLOT 1 I ms nzx - I'
RuRi s Eurn%iN cHRSrENaEN ON,ERS w HF%Br9PFROVEDer1HE TowN
~ nleArnES
aoNm. zes si so. P1. 1I II
iorwwiirtw. romTeaH - o~TF aunoTtreroFSx+winr ^ jai
I ~ U 4~fNNm FROMTHE00lO9NIC ~ ~1 It1I~ I
L HERFSr CERnFr,H9r rHE FOxEOawO~sNCOwaAnFaoulinNAOOPrto er LM+oowwFnronrtvAS. I I ~ I
rHE,owN enMrooF THErowN OFESU On,F I _ LOT 6
_ Its i
wri"Unu P@AvEr:fvvNaElm wrE e00&w t15 I ~ I
MxES ~ i °
wwNweas-Fr. 4
ox. S
rOwN rR,EFaLSiFRSLERnFlCArE - I ~ LB.O.. 1125.0 125.0
tl :PROSED
srnre OF VnscwsNns Sol 8'00'E - - - - - - - 'T" ~TME NewcF,HE%w M" DRIVPOE i
cwNttasi. cRaro 33.01' Nonni LelE-aniE Sew OTiNESew - - . I` - -
LrSLWMFEAVEr.%R+S rHE WLr EtecrFO.ou~.rieo.NOrcu vrovm su wu,HLwE OP „e,acvmas ' N'? q~.
}RENSUREP OF THE rOww OF EMICKIE NEREer CERIIFIAULiNM;COTM9.4 ~ - FEfr OFCE%WOFIHE%V~ ♦ -~.lJ' I
VMHTHE RECORDSw EFr OPFOE nIEREME NO UNFNprNtES OR SPECwI ~ -
A%EEAtFNiB NB CF aNY OF 11R WAwCLWEONTHE '
Fula POwNC NUOOws FKLx- - m L`H.W.L-1123A ys
wA~F.t nERVE-iO'NH iREASORER wrE 2
Izrov I I
N88'37'20'W 1311.39'
IR.senrac attar) - t I
CIXN,r rREA5156RBCER,FiGni > 6®4 9 Cb°QW40POf3p ~MW~P/ I~App Ofkl N/(~6, 9(~~. I
CWNtt OF Sf. CROm C I .
LcHERn suNO. eENI rHEOUr E~ciEO. au9LwlEO NmM:uNO rr~ASUReROF LEGEND i
9t pCIgvCWN1Y,DOHERE9Y LER,IFIhNTTNE RECOR09NMr OFFOESNgYNO ~ .
uN EOEENEO rAr s9tESREro NOUrmuo rKESORSFEDa.ASSma9DasNSa - ~I N B NuA9EAA1ccu+tt%c1aN II
KFEL,ING THE VwOROLO9EDNlIE RAi OF pOWH6 'j`I CORNER LO,111E1FFEffOUNo
MfNAlI1i I.B~{k
I b ~ • zxoA mNRPF FOUw ~
OVIRC .6-- I-E o • t•on ww RFEwM+o c,
couNttiRFISURER ~ 3
I ~ ■ vrnorsaEe.n Patio p6
Si. LFOIXCWxtt PtANNNOAUO ZONNO COLwSR%REBplITON O mLBE PRI DNFANFOOT
~meUILCI,O%I9RCIt IfE
RESpvEO,nMi1NE PUfOF ROtIAl0 L1EMOW5 FM1MW111E tONP10R FAV OMLE, 1 PRELB019LY09G 9E OaINFn
9UPf9 EIU~BE,H CHRgiENSEN.OANER49HEPFAr KPRWEO BrTHF3T.GO0t I ~ IR.Inmef
CIXINtt PIANWAi MA mNNa CpIMiTEE. b ffCiONm
t}H1L'S OIEIIYEREEMEM
iw ZOERe.CNKi MlE FROFO~wWEwNYLOGION
SCALE IN FEET 1' = 100' nppFAi BEiEIt. WOEAOwe-R+rOR MiE rH.W.L~1123,010RRNi0E PA90ENr
i
100 0 100 200
H.W.L+ tml'FAitMON YMTERUIE•aYA1ON
LS.O.. LOwESr•MOeOOP•Yq ErEYATON
wrswsiwlNENrmuPTEOersN9 3 roe NO.os5r wre: szas SHEET 1 OF 1 SHEETS
r
SAFETY AND BUILDINGS DIVISION
commerce.wi.gov Integrated Services Bureau
13 East Spruce Street
, W1
5472s
isconsin INSPECTION REPORT Chippewa Fa
www rce.st ate. wi.us/sb
Department of Commerce X26-2544
Date of Inspection: June 1, 2005 Plumber Name and Address:
Project Name: Christensen Unknown J1M 2 3 2005
Use: Residential
Legal Description: NE, SE, 23, 28, 16W 1X,( COUNTY
Site Number: Certified Soil Tester Name and FRC&
Subdivision: Proposed CSM Lots 1 - 8 Eli Gottfreid, CST 221981
Municipality: Town of P4ees
y PO Box 1645
County: St.Croix ei -rte Eau Claire WI 54702
Plan Transaction Number: 1024998 Owner Name and Address:
Sanitary Permit Number: Kurt and Elizabeth Christensen
877 Benoy Rd
Wastewater Flow: 450 gpd Hudson WI 54016
Persons Present: E. Gottfried u
An onsite soils verification was conducted at the above referenced site as per district policy for all sites with less
than four inches of unsaturated soil below the bottom of the A horizon. The intent of this investigation is to
confirm initial observations by the certified soil tester (CST) relating. to the presence or absence of redoximorphic
features in the A horizon and/or subsoil. In-situ soil texture, structure, and consistence factors were also reviewed
as they relate to wastewater application rates. Other site conditions such as percent and direction of slope,
landscape position, land surface contour length, and surface water hydrology may also be noted and their effects
are factors considered in the recommendations and conclusions portion of this report.
A typical soil profile for the areas evaluated on these two lost may be described as follows:
j
00-08" 10YR 3/2 sil, 2f--msbk, mfr, cw. No rmfs observed in A.
08-12" 10YR 4/3 sil (5% gr), 2mabk, mfr, w/ c1f 10YR 4/6 rmfs.
Note: Locate mound 25 feet further west on contour than currently proposed.
Parcel 1
00-06" 10YR 3/2 sil, 2msbk, mfr, as.
06-15" 10YR 4/4 sicl, 1 mpl, mfr, w/ f2d 7.5YR 5/6 rmfs.
Farm House Site - Currently Served By A Holding Tank --LQr3
Two soil borings were checked in an area southeast of the home.
Redox features were observed in the A horizon in both soil borings.
Soil saturation monitoring as per Comm 83.60(3) may be required at
this site if additional does not reveal soils with no redox in the A horizon.
If a mound system is designed to overcome limitations of a high level of seasonal soil saturation and slow
permeability, the linear loading rate should not exceed 4.5 gpd/ft and the basal wastewater application rated
should not exceed 0.2 gpd/ft2. Chisel plowing to a depth of 12 plus inches is recommended. The additional basal
area will partially compensate for the gentle land slope and prevent wastewater leakage at the mound toe. At
least.30 inches of sand lift is recommended when applying septic tank effluent to the distribution cell of the mound
to ensure proper treatment. The longest portion of the mound must be orientated along the contour. The mound
shall be constructed to divert surface water around the mound structure as much as possible. In addition, an up
Parcel 008-2017-05-000 04/12/2012 A 1
PAGE E 1 1 OF 1
Alt. Parcel 23.28.16.598 008 - TOWN OF EAU GALLE
Current 0 ST. CROIX COUNTY, WISCONSIN
Creation Date Historical Date Map # Sales Area Application # Permit # Permit Type # of Units
11/22/2005 00 0
Tax Address: Owner(s): 0 = Current Owner, C = Current Co-Owner
0 - CHRISTENSEN, KURT & ELIZABETH
KURT & ELIZABETH CHRISTENSEN
847 WYLDWOOD LN
HUDSON WI 54016
Districts: SC = School SP = Special Property Address(es): * = Primary
Type Dist # Description * 240 CTY RD B
SC 0231 SCH D BALDWIN-WDVILLE
SP 1700 WITC
Legal Description: Acres: 9.230 Plat: 10-089-ROLLING MEADOWS FARM LOTS 1/6 008-0:
SEC 23 T28N R16W PT NE SE ROLLING Block/Condo Bldg: LOT 005
MEADOWS FARM ('05) LOT 5
Tract(s): (Sec-Twn-Rng 401/4 1601/4)
23-28N-16W NE SE
Notes: Parcel History:
Date Doc # Vol/Page Type
12/01/2005 813339 2937/166 WD
11/22/2005 812709 10/089 PLAT
2012 SUMMARY Bill M Fair Market Value: Assessed with:
Use Value Assessment
Valuations: Last Changed: 10/07/2008
Description Class Acres Land Improve Total State Reason
AGRICULTURAL G4 7.730 1,600 0 1,600 NO
UNDEVELOPED G5 1.500 1,300 0 1,300 NO
Totals for 2012:
General Property 9.230 2,900 0 2,900
Woodland 0.000 0 0
Totals for 2011:
General Property 9.230 2,900 0 2,900
Woodland 0.000 0 0
Lottery Credit: Claim Count: 0 Certification Date: Batch
Specials:
User Special Code Category Amount
Special Assessments Special Charges Delinquent Charges
Total 0.00 0.00 0.00
s y Safety and Buildings
10541 N RANCH ROAD
commerce.Wl.goV HAYWARD WI 54843
TDD (608) 264-8777
1 www.commerce.wi.gov/sb/
i SC4 n S 1 n ORIGINAL www.wisconsin.gov
Department of Commerce
Jim Doyle, Governor
Mary P. Burke, Secretary
July 0 2005 7
~a
y Gip\X (3~y~ pF¢k0'e
ATTN: POWTS Inspector
CUST ID No. 4225 8 ELI M
GOTTFRIED ~
GOTTFRIED ENVIRONME ZONING OFFICE
124 1/2 GRAHAM AVE ST CROIX COUNTY SPIA
PO BOX 1645 1101 CARMICHAEL RD
EAU CLAIRE WI 54702-1645 HUDSON WI 54016
CONDITIONAL APPROVAL
PLAN APPROVAL EXPIRES: 07/01/2007 Identification Numbers
Transaction ID No. 1150506
SITE: Kurt & Elizabeth Christensen Site ID No. 700774
25TH Ave / Cth B I-0'13' f{ s 0 1'►~dth~S Please refer to both identification numbers,
Town of Eau Galle, St Croix County above, in all correspondence with the agency.
SE 1/4, NW 1/4, S23, T28N, RI lW
FOR: Object Type: Soil Saturation Determination Regulated Object ID No.: 1025852
The submittal described above has been reviewed for conformance with applicable Wisconsin Administrative Codes
and Wisconsin Statutes. The submittal has been CONDITIONALLY APPROVED. The owner, as defined in
chapter 101.01(10), Wisconsin Statutes, is responsible for compliance with all code requirements.
The following conditions shall be met during construction or installation and prior to occupancy or use:
1. Approval is hereby granted pursuant to s. Comm 85.60(2), Wis. Adm. Code, to estimate the depth to seasonal soil
saturation based on an interpretive determination process. Approval of the interpretive determination negates the
requirement in s. Comm 85.30(2)(b), Wis. Adm. Code to designate the ground surface as the higest level of soil
saturation when redoximorphic features are less than 4 inches below the bottom of the A horizon.
2. The estimated highest level of prolonged soil saturation approved under this determination is 6 inches below
grade. At least 30 inches of sand lift on top of 6 inches of unsaturated, in-situ soil is required for adequate treatment
and dispersal.
3. The basal soil application rate for the mound shall be 0.2 gpd/sf, and the linear loading rate 4.0 gpd/ft.
4. Chisel plowing to a depth of 12+ inches immediately prior to sand placement is required to improve vertical water
movement into the soil solum.
5. Landscaping up slope of the mound shall be incorporated into the POWTS design to prevent surface water from
concentrating along the up slope edge of the mound and to divert surface water drainage away from the system.
6. This approval shall remain valid unless the site is altered in such a way that the depth to soil saturation would
change or if saturated conditions are observed for seven consecutive days at depths less than 3 feet below the
infiltrative surface of the POWTS distribution component.
7. This approval in no way relinquishes the use of color patterns to estimate the depth to high groundwater on any
other parcels or portions of parcels.
8. A copy of this approval letter and attachments must accompany the mound system design for this site for purposes
of plan approval and sanitary permit issuance.
If the Interpretive Determination Report was accompanied with a plan and an expiration date is shown on this letter,
the expiration date only applies to the plans for the design, not to the decision on the Interpretive Determination
Report.
J
1
ELI M GOTTFRIED Page 2 7/1/2005
A copy of the approved plans, specifications dhd this letter shall be on-site during construction and open to
inspection by authorized representatives of the Department, which may include local inspectors. If plan index sheets
were submitted in lieu of additional full plansets, a copy of this approval letter and index sheet shall be attached to
plans that correspond with the copy on file with the Department. All permits required by the state or the local
municipality shall be obtained prior to commencement of construction/installation/operation.
In granting this approval the Division of Safety & Buildings reserves the right to require changes or additions should
conditions arise making them necessary for code compliance. As per state stats 101.12(2), nothing in this review
shall relieve the designer of the responsibility for designing a safe building, structure, or component.
Inquiries concerning this correspondence may be made to me at the telephone number listed below, or at the address
on this letterhead.
Sincerely, Fee Required $ 100.00
Fee Received $ 100.00
Balance Due $ 0.00
roy G. sky, Was ater Sp cia 'St
Integrated Services Bureau WiSMART code: 7633
(715)726-2544 Voice
(715)726-2549 Fax
ljansky@commerce.state.wi.us
LGOTTFRIED ENVIRONMENTAL i
124 Graham Ave., Eau Claire, WI 54701; 715-833-1400
telephone: 715-833-1400; fax: 715-833-1381; email: elicstm(&,sbcglobal.net
INTERPRETATIVE REPORT 11500-06 14 June 15, 2005 p,Q.W.T S.
Conditionally
Proper owner: Kurt and Elizabeth Christensen rr 0 ED
RON
Legal Description: NE SE 23 28 16 W Aw" m Eau Galle, St. Croix County DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
DIVI ION OF SAFETY AND BUILDINGS
INTRODUCTION s4.E c ft r_ pENc
Between 3 May and 13 May 2005, soil tests and evaluations were conducted by me on the
property described above. The soil tests were done in response to a request by the property
owner, Elizabeth Christensen, as part of the development of this parcel for residences. It is the
intention of the property owners, Kurt and Elizabeth Christensen, to subdivide this 40 Acre
portion of land into 6 parcels. Each parcel is intended to have 1 residence.
RATIONALE FOR THE INTERPRETIVE REPORT
High and low chroma features in the soil as compared with matrix soil colors are considered as
indicators of seasonal saturation in the State of Wisconsin. Department of Commerce Comm
81.01 (118) states:
"High groundwater" means zones of soil saturation which include perched water tables,
shallow regional groundwater tables or aquifers, or zones that are seasonally, periodically
or permanently saturated.
Comm 81.01 (119) further defines evidence of seasonal saturation in the soils:
"High groundwater elevation" means the higher of either the elevation to which the soil is
saturated when observed as a free water surface, or the elevation to which the soil has
been seasonally or periodically saturated as indicated by the highest elevation of
redoximorphic features in the soils.
At least 36 inches of soil separation is required between the bottom of the soil absorption system
and the redoximorphic soil features in most types of soils (Table 83.44-3, Department of
Commerce). Where this does not exist, an above ground SAS must be constructed (i.e. mound or
At-Grade).
The initial determination of this site has found the site to be unsuitable for mound type septic
systems (Soil Absorption System), as per WAC Comm 85.30(2)(a) and (b). This code section
mandates that:
1
1. Redoximorphic features be used as an indicator of seasonal saturation in the soils.
2., `Redoximorphic features appearing at depths of within 4 inches of the bottom of the A
horizon shall be interpreted as seasonal saturation occurring at ground surface ("Unless
determined otherwise..., the highest elevation of seasonal soil saturation shall be the
ground surface where redoximorphic features are present within 4 inches of the bottom of
the A horizon.")
Although Comm 85.30(2)(b) mandates that redoximorphic features within 4 inches of the A
horizon be interpreted as seasonal saturation to ground surface, Comm 85.60(2)(a) allows for an
interpretive determination of the soil conditions and depth to seasonal saturation should this
condition exist. This section states in'part:
"A written report by a certified soil tester evaluating and interpreting redoximorphic soil features
may be submitted to the department in lieu of high groundwater determination data. The
written report shall conclusively demonstrate that the existing soil morphological features or
color patterns are not indicative of current conditions of periodic soil saturation."
This is the basis for the current report.
GEOLOGICAL HISTORY
The subsurface formation in St. Croix County consists of the Prairie Du Chien Group (dolomite
and sandy dolomite). Depth to bedrock ranges from 0 - 15 meters (Brown, B.A. (1988)). This
formation is of Ordovician origin (Paleozoic era 425 mya). Dolomite appears to have been laid
during the early Ordovician period, while the sandstone was laid during the late part of the period
(Paull, R.K. and Paull, R.A. (1977)).
Glaciation of St. Croix County occurred many times during the history of the earth, although the
most recent glaciation, during the Pleistocene epoch (approximately 1 million to 10,000 years
before present), is the most apparent. There were several stages of glacial advance, the most
recent being the Wisconsinan stage. This was the result of the advance of the Superior Lobe and,
from this, the Chippewa Lobe (Martin, L. (1965). The Physical Geology of Wisconsin.
University of Wisconsin Press, Madison, Wisconsin).
St. Croix County appears to be part of the geographical province of the Western Upland. As
noted by Paull et al (Paull, R.K., R.A. Paull (1977) Geology of Wisconsin and Upper Michigan.
Kendall / Hunt Publishing Company, Dubuque, IA), "The Paleozoic rocks are the retreating
erosional edges of marine sediments that once extended across the Northern Highland.... Late
Cambrian seas washed over the Precambrian erosional surface to deposit more than 1,000 feet of
sandstone, with minor amounts of interbedded dolomite."
The St. Croix River has its origin in the Northern Highlands and its resistant Precambrian rock.
The loess deposits in St. Croix County appear to be the result of the westerly winds carrying fine
textured soils easterly to the eastern bluffs of the river and beyond.
The soils observed on site suggest that the area has been influenced by glaciation. Soils appear to
be loess (fine-textured, wind blown soil), underlain by glacial till. Loess, present as fine-textured
silt and silt loam in the Ap horizon, may be the result of the influence of the wind-blown fines of
2
s
,
the St Croix River floodplain.
Four of the six lots on this parcel of land appear suitable for A+4 Mound type systems. Two
parcels, however, identified as parcel 1 and parcel 5, are A+0 sites. These sites, however, do not
have redoximorphic features in the A Horizon.
DESCRIPTION OF THE SITE
The parcel of land under investigation lays in the NE SE 23 28 16W, Eau Galle, St. Croix
County. All land lays west of County Trunk Highway B and south of 25`h Avenue.
The land is composed of gently rolling hills with slopes ranging from 11 % to 2.4% in the
immediate areas of the mound systems. Landscape position of the mound systems plays a large
part in the suitability of the soils on site. Mounds located on the tops of the hills have the deepest
depth of suitable soil. These sites are A+4 sites (proposed parcels 2, 3, and 4). In addition to
being at the highest points of the slopes for proposed parcels 3 and 4, the locations of these
mound systems are on moderate slopes (8% and 11%, respectively). The siting of the mound for
the proposed parcel 6 is located on a knoll at the bottom of the hill that lays along County Trunk
Highway B. Sites located on the shoulders of the hills are A+0 sites (proposed parcels I and 5).
This is consistent with the fact that soils on top of the hill receive the most moisture and the least
amount of runoff. The greater the amount of precipitation percolating through the soil, the
greater the soil development. Areas located on the shoulder of the hill will have more erosion
and more surface runoff. The area immediately downslope of the parcel five mound is part of a
back-slope and therefore has soils with redox features in the A horizon. Along Highway B, the
area between proposed parcel 3 and 6 appears to be a slight depression in the landscape. This
area may constitute a waterway. The Mounds located in proposed parcels 1 and 5 may have soils
that are influenced by water movement along the tops of the dense glacial till. This may be a
factor in contributing to the presence of redox features immediately below the A horizon.
SOIL MAPPING OF THE AREA
The soils in the proposed mound site are identified as Vlasaty series soil (VaB) according to the
Soil Survey of St. Croix County, published by the Natural Resource Conservation Service of the
U.S. Department of Agriculture. These soils are described as being "moderately well-drained
soils on low ridges and knolls of ground moraines." They are further described as having been
"formed in silty sediment and in the underlying clay loam till." Taxonomically, this soil series is
classified as Glossaquic Hapludalfs.
On-site evaluation of the soils on this site is in agreement with the published soils data for the
site. As noted in the accompanying soil reports, the proposed mound areas were found to have a
silt loam topsoil and subsoil and a clay loam parent material.
With regards to the two A+0 mound sites, redoximorphic features were found in either the Bt
horizon (silty clay loam) (7 to 12 inches below grade) or the E horizon. In the case of the mound
site for proposed parcel 1, redox features were also found in the Ap2 horizon in the pit furthest
downslope of the bed site. The fact that evidence of seasonal saturation was found at 7 to 12
inches warrants the classification of the soil as aquic. Note that the proposed mound sites for
3
r
parcels 2, 3, 4 and 6 do not have aquic soil conditions.
As noted above, the fact that the mound sites on proposed parcels 2, 3, 4, and 6 are not aquic can
be attributed to either land position or slope, or a combination of the two. The proposed mound
for parcel 3 is located on the highest part of the East portion of the 40-acre parcel. Likewise, the
mound on parcel 2 is located on the highest point of the West portion of the 40-acre parcel. In
addition, the slopes on the proposed mound sites for parcels 3 and 4 are 11 % and 8%,
respectively. Therefore, these parcels are well-drained, due to land position. Parcel 6 is located
on a knoll in the midst of an overall toe slope on the east portion of the 40-acre parcel.
Waterways are located to the north, south, and west of the proposed parcel 6 mound site.
LOCAL HYDROLOGY
As noted on the accompanying plot plan and topographic map for this area, this 40-acre parcel
consists of rolling hills interspersed with waterways. The proposed mound sites are located on
the upslopes of the waterways. Land along County Trunk Highway B slopes primarily to the
south. As noted above, parcels 2, 3, 4 and 6 are suitable for A+4 mounds. Parcels 1 and 5 are
suitable for mound systems, but have a soil profile in which there is no separation between the
bottom of the A Horizon and the start of redox features of greater than 4 inches. General surface
flow is towards the interspersed drainageways. Primary drainageways appear to be between
parcels 3 and 6, with water moving from east to west and between parcels 1 and 4, with water
moving from north to south. Regional flow may be west towards the St. Croix River.
The topographic maps consulted for this report do not indicate any wetland areas in the vicinity
of the proposed mound dispersal systems. No naturally occurring areas of standing water were
observed in the area of the proposed mound POWTS.
SIGNIFICANCE OF REPORTED SOIL CONDITIONS AND SURFACE
WATER FLOW
General surface water flow in the area may be primarily vertical for the first 7 to 12 inches
(approximately) as a result of the relatively permeable upper horizons. Permeability is
moderately slow in the subsoil and is most likely perching above the dense silty clay loam and
clay loam subsoil layers.
Most recent use of the land is as a farm field. Soils appear to have good structure in the upper
horizons. Thus, water flows uninhibited through the A horizon. Water flow through the E
horizon is slightly impeded due to the weakly platey structure. Here, redox features are faint.
Water flow is also slightly impeded in the Bt horizon where structure is weak. Again, in some
areas, the redox features are faint. In other areas, redox features are distinct. Within the C
horizon, structure is massive. Here, redox features are distinct to prominent.
In the Ap horizon, and slightly into the subsoil (Btl a moderate amount of worm channels were
observed (not reported in soil report). This suggests that the upper horizons are aerated enough
to support aerobic organisms. As noted by Brady and Weil (1990) (Brady, N.C. and Weil, R.R.
The Nature and Properties of Soils 13th Ed, Prentice Hall Upper Saddle River, N.J. p. 463),
"Earthworms prefer a moist, but well-aerated environment. They do not live under anaerobic
4
conditions..."
Roots and root channels were also present in the 0 to 10" (approximate) range of the soil profile.
Soil colors as noted by this soil tester were l OYR 3/2 in the Ap horizon except for parcel 5 where
the soil color in the Ap horizon was IOYR 2/2. The I OYR 3/2 soil color is indicative of a more
well-aerated soil, as opposed to the darker, more l OYR 2/1 soil color of an organic topsoil. The
darker soil color in the Ap horizon of parcel 5 here may have been a reflection of the weather
conditions for the day that the soils were evaluated. The day of 17 May, the sky was overcast
with periods of rain. Soil color in the Bt horizon was l OYR 4/4 to I OYR 5/3. These colors are
representative of normal subsoil color. Gleyed soils are generally in the range of l OYR 5/2 to
IOYR 6/2. The lack of redoximorphic features, the lighter (10YR 3/2) colors in the Ap horizon
and the non-gleYed colors in the subsoil indicate that soils in the immediate vicinity of pits
observed well-aerated and are not saturated for more than 7 consecutive days. No puddled or
massive soils were observed in the area of the proposed SAS's to a depth to the bottom of the
Bt l horizon.
With regards to the A+0 sites, close inspection of the Ap horizon did not indicate the presence of
redoximorphic features. This suggests that although there is not an A+4 situation, there is
adequate depth in the A horizon (approximately 7 inches) to maintain a suitable distance between
the bottom of the SAS and the limiting factor and thus to allow for the placement of a mound
SAS as per code.
HISTIC SOILS
Keys to Soil Taxonomy (1994) defines a histic epipedon as follows:
It consists of organic soil material if the soil has not been plowed. If the soil has been
plowed, the epipedon normally has a high content of organic matter The histic epipedon either
has aquic conditions for some time in most years or has been artificially drained."
The Keys to Soil Taxonomy defines aquic conditions as: "those [soils] which currently
experience continuous or periodic saturation and reduction.... Saturation is characterized by zero
or positive pressure in the soil-water and can generally be determined by observing free water in
an unlined auger hole."
In neither the auger holes nor in the shallow hand-dug pits was standing water observed in the
epipedon. In addition, soil colors in the epipedon were not those characteristic of organic soils
(IOYR 2/2).
Vepraskas (1996) points out 3 possible redoximorphic conditions:
1. Redox depletions around macropores and redox concentrations within the matrix;
2. Redox concentrations around macropores and redox depletions within the matrix;
3. Combination of the 2 conditions.
Each of the 3 conditions has a unique etiology. Condition 1 will occur, according to Vepraskas,
in situations where there is perching above a dense and slowly permeable layer. Such appears to
be the condition described on the site outlined in this report. However, redox depletions were
not observed in the macropores in the Ap horizon or in the Btl horizon of pits 6 and 7. In pit 8,
redox features were observed in the macropores of horizon of horizon Bt I.
5
CONCLUSIONS
No redoximorphic features were observed for at least 7 inches of the Ap horizon in any of the
pits evaluated. The soils in this upper 7 inches appeared to be well aerated with the presence of
roots and worm channels. Water movement therefore appears to take place in this upper layer
and there does not appear to be a condition of ponding for any significant period of time in this
upper layer. The slope is approximately 9%, suggesting that water moves laterally away from the
sites.
Features of This Site
The four A+4 mound sites in this 40 acre parcel are all either on the highest points in their
respective locations or are on moderately steep slopes or both. This allows for adequate water
movement through the soils and for a suitable amount of soil development. The two sites in
which interpretive reports are required (A+0 sites) are the sites located on back-slopes. Even
though the sites are located on back-slopes, there is adequate slope to the sites (approximately
5%) to allow for water movement through the soils and away from the mound sites. Sites on the
40 acre parcel that are unsuitable for the placement of mound systems are located in waterways
or on foot-slopes.
PROPOSALS
This soil tester feels that a mound systems on the A+0 sites on this 40 acre parcel would
adequately provide effluent treatment and dispersal as long as the follows design conditions are
implemented:
1. The construction of the soil absorption systems must be in the area designated on the plot
plans.
2. Areas lower in the landscape must not be used for soil absorption systems.
3. The distribution cell must be designed very long and narrow with a linear loading rate
less than 4.0 gpd/ft. This may limit the number of bedrooms and / or occupancy that can
be serviced on the site.
4. At least 2.50 feet of ASTM C-33 sand must be used under the laterals for the proposed
system.
5. Maximum hole spacing in laterals must be 30 inches.
6. Slopes around the mound must be 1:4 rather than the traditional 1:3 to increase the toe
absorption area.
7. The area upslope of the proposed SAS must be provided with a constructed waterway to
divert water around the mound. The purpose of the waterway will be to prevent water
from being trapped in the mound.
6
If you have any questions regarding this report, please feel free to contact me at the above
address and/or telephone number.
Sincerely,
Eli A Gottfried
Registered Sanitarian (80806), CST (221981), Licensed Designer (1310)
7
vat
A& -04A
~ y ` H4. N ♦ / COI
SrA,
FoB
4 31a
5rA f v ,bOC
5aC2 ra,~ ? fdA
SaC2
y Ar?Ot c Fo8
J 4i FdA MaE
SO,
VaB ti
SrR VaB Ari(11 faC
08 t
q r s(1 c t
AcC3 vaa: QT ✓ /
APP
Approx. location of
Bp~1 Fo8
hA Ma8 rrnrosedmounde
5tA
r P / e V,aB
r [ S, A
RhA liuA t MaF~ FOB
Vas
IA V• a
mac i ~ r VAoA
z- r'A
CY S A a B
Arrow points to the approximate location of the proposed mounds. The soil series maps indicate
that this is Vlasaty series soil with a slope of 12-20%. Proposed mounds are located on slopes
ranging from 2.4% to 11 The mounds classified as A+0 mounds are located on approximate
back slopes with the slopes of approximately 5%.
8
j w
ti
12 )
3
Arrow points to approximate location of proposed mound systems. Mounds are located upslope
of the waterways. The mounds sites with A+4 soil conditions exist on slopes of 8 to 11% and /
or are located at the highest land position. Mounds qualifying for A+0 condition are found on
the back-slopes. Sites that do not qualify for mounds are located in waterways or at the foot-
slope land positions.
9
SAFETY AND BUILDINGS DIVISION
commerce.wi.gov Integrated Services Bureau
i R~L
13 East Spruce Street
INSPECTION REPORT Chippewa Falls, WI 54729
cemmerce.state.wi.ustsb
s i n www•
'f! mmerce (715) 726-2544
Date of Inspection: June 1, 2005 Plumber Name and Address:
Project Name: Christensen Unknown
Use: Residential
Legal Description: NE, SE, 23, 28, 16W
Site Number: Certified Soil Tester Name and Address:
Subdivision: Proposed CSM Lots 1 - 8 Eli Gottfreid, CST 221981
Municipality: Town of Pleasant Valley PO Box 1645
County: St.Croix Eau Claire WI 54702
Plan Transaction Number: 1024998 Owner Name and Address:
Sanitary Permit Number: Kurt and Elizabeth Christensen
877 Benoy Rd
Wastewater Flow: 450 gpd Hudson WI 54016
Persons Present: E. Gottfried
An onsite soils verification was conducted at the above referenced site as per district policy for all sites with less
than four inches of unsaturated soil below the bottom of the A horizon. The intent of this investigation is to
confirm initial observations by the certified soil tester (CST) relating to the presence or absence of redoximorphic
features in the A horizon and/or subsoil. In-situ soil texture, structure, and consistence factors were also reviewed
as they relate to wastewater application rates. Other site conditions such as percent and direction of slope,
landscape position, land surface contour length, and surface water hydrology may also be noted and their effects
are factors considered in the recommendations and conclusions portion of this report.
A typical soil profile for the areas evaluated on these two lost may be described as follows:
Parcel 5
00-08" 10YR 3/2 sil, 2f-msbk, mfr, cw. No rmfs observed in A.
08-12" 10YR 4/3 sil (5% gr), 2mabk, mfr, w/ clf 10YR 4/6 rmfs.
Note: Locate mound 25 feet further west on contour than currently proposed.
Parcel 1
00-06" 10YR 3/2 sil, 2msbk, mfr, as.
06-15" 10YR 4/4 sicl, 1 mpl, mfr, w/ f2d 7.5YR 5/6 rmfs.
Farm House Site - Currently Served By A Holding Tank
Two soil borings were checked in an area southeast of the home.
Redox features were observed in the A horizon in both soil borings.
Soil saturation monitoring as per Comm 83.60(3) may be required at
this site if additional does not reveal soils with no redox in the A horizon.
If a mound system is designed to overcome limitations of a high level of seasonal soil saturation and slow
permeability, the linear loading rate should not exceed 4.5 gpd/ft and the basal wastewater application rated
should not exceed 0.2 gpd/ftz. Chisel plowing to a depth of 12 plus inches is recommended. The additional basal
area will partially compensate for the gentle land slope and prevent wastewater leakage at the mound toe. At
least 30 inches of sand lift is recommended when applying septic tank effluent to the distribution cell of the mound
to ensure proper treatment. The longest portion of the mound must be orientated along the contour. The mound
shall be constructed to divert surface water around the mound structure as much as possible. In addition, an up
10
Page 2 of 2
June 1, 2005
Christensen Property
slope drainage ditch should be considered if it is determined that surface or subsurface hydrology is improved by
intercepting water and diverting it away from the mound site.
If there are any questions regarding this report, please contact me.
eroy G. nsky, W terS cialist
Ljansky ommer tate.wi.u E-mail
715/726-2544 Voice 715/726-2549 Fax
cc: County ❑ Plumber ® CST ❑ Owner ❑ Other
11
REFERENCES
1. Brady, N.C. and Weil, R.R. The Nature and Properties of Soils 13th Ed, Prentice Hall
Upper Saddle River, N.J. p. 463
2. Brown, B.A. (1988) Bedrock Geology of Wisconsin (Brown 1988, University of
Wisconsin - Extension
3. Havholm, K. G. (1998) Pre-Quaternary Geological History of Western Wisconsin with an
Emphasis on the Cambrian Sandstones: Tri-State/University of Wisconsin System
Geological Field Conference, pages 3-14.
4. Martin, L. (1965). The Physical Geology of Wisconsin. University of Wisconsin Press,
Madison, Wisconsin
5. Paull, R.K. and Paull, R.A. (1977) Geology of Wisconsin and Upper Michigan.
Kendall/Hunt Publishing Company, Dubuque, IA.
6. National Audubon Society Field Guide to North American Trees (Eastern Region):
(1998) Chanticleer Press Inc., NY, NY
7. Soil survey of St Croix County (1978). United States Dept of Agriculture Soil
Conservation Service and Research Division of the College of Agriculture and Life
Sciences, University of Wisconsin.
8. Syverson, K. M. (1998) Glacial History of Western Wisconsin in Tri-State/University of
Wisconsin System Geological Field Conference, pages 15-28
9. Vepraskas, M. (1996) Redoximorphic Features for Identifying Aquic Conditions. North
Carolina Research Service. North Carolina State University. Raleigh, North Carolina.
Technical Bulletin 301.
12
N lp
O m N
cc
2 0) L
a
0 M
n mp
O ° O
L X T y
O
E - O C yy
J `p = 0]
j N U
m 00 A V
m I I I €H
I I o w
I I ~ ~ c 3
v o -
1 I 1 I \ n
1 \ \ b 1 \
'co a)
\o ~ \ CT
\ \ \ N [1 000 - O. anD d'
\ O \ \
ai \ \ \ \
> \ \ \ \
N \ \
co
O N \ 4 OM
D
0 (0
F U \ \ \ \ 16 >
U xp
m \ \v rn
° n M N V'v m o n
foil \ \ \ O \ O \ I N (V
O O m
D_ \
O \ \ m M N
I Old pi N
d CD \ OR \ \ I m Ll 0 00
1 >
di B '6 o 4)
C.12 ~r --6 Q N w O M
L N U Q\ p
N C O
C N p \ O
Of N 2, V - C \ pr
V
n in O m
0)
M
OO
O \ \ m 1 (D u0i
O \ > U C" \ \
II I Q \ (n w V r W
M
Y T \ t \
w b \ \
00
N > O N - I I a1 \ \ 011 0000
O0
IL C1 N t0 / / / A A
N N E T M Ol / 1.n I
yl M N O T I
C N. C C (s -,dl I
NWT °c lm yM tw'm 'i6 N-o~ - m
0 I
zw E°m 21~ ui °Oa / l / l
m /
/ OD /
-ol
/ N/
/ In
00
OD
o a
Z U
C/) v al
0ma
O M 'y
d O)
SAFETY AND BUILDINGS DIVISION
commerce.wi.gov Integrated
13 East Spruce Street
i Chippewa Falls, WI 54729
s consin INSPECTION REPORT www1Jbi%r4rrce.state.wi.us/sb
Department of Commerce 1726 2544
Date of Inspection: June 1, 2005 Plumber Name and Address:
Project Name: Christensen Unknown 2 3 2005
Use: Residential Legal Description: NE, SE, 23, 28, 16W
Site Number: Certified Soil Tester Name and -F(Ce
Subdivision: Proposed CSM Lots 1 -8 Eli Gottfreid, CST 221981
Municipality: Town of P-lees~ y PO Box 1645
County: St.Croix IL-alt 1-OL lC~ Eau Claire WI 54702
Plan Transaction Number: 1024998 Owner Name and Address:
Sanitary Permit Number: Kurt and Elizabeth Christensen
877 Benoy Rd
Wastewater Flow: 450 gpd Hudson WI 54016
Persons Present: E. Gottfried A
- - p
An onsite soils verification was conducted at the above referenced site as per district policy for all sites with less
than four inches of unsaturated soil below the bottom of the A horizon. The intent of this investigation is to
confirm initial observations by the certified soil tester (CST) relating to the presence or absence of redoximorphic
features in the A horizon and/or subsoil. In-situ soil texture, structure, and consistence factors were also reviewed
as they relate to wastewater application rates. Other site conditions such as percent and direction of slope,
landscape position, land surface contour length, and surface water hydrology may also be noted and their effects
are factors considered in the recommendations and conclusions portion of this report.
A typical soil profile for the areas evaluated on these two lost may be described as follows:
Parcel 5
00-08" 10YR 3/2 sil, 2f-msbk, mfr, cw. No rmfs observed in A.
08-12" 10YR 4/3 sil (5% gr), 2mabk, mfr, w/ c1f 10YR 4/6 rmfs.
Note: Locate mound 25 feet further west on contour than currently proposed.
Parcel 1
00-06" 10YR 3/2 sil, 2msbk, mfr, as.
06-15" 10YR 4/4 sic[, 1 mpl, mfr, w/ f2d 7.5YR 5/6 rmfs.
Farm House Site - Currently Served By A Holding Tank LuT 3
Two soil borings were checked in an area southeast of the home.
Redox features were observed in the A horizon in both soil borings.
Soil saturation monitoring as per Comm 83.60(3) may be required at
this site if additional does not reveal soils with no redox in the A horizon.
If a mound system is designed to overcome limitations of a high level of seasonal soil saturation and slow
permeability, the linear loading rate should not exceed 4.5 gpd/ft and the basal wastewater application rated
should not exceed 0.2 gpd/ftz. Chisel plowing to a depth of 12 plus inches is recommended. The additional basal
area will partially compensate for the gentle land slope and prevent wastewater leakage at the mound toe. At
least .30 inches of sand lift is recommended when applying septic tank effluent to the distribution cell of the mound
to ensure proper treatment. The longest portion of the mound must be orientated along the contour. The mound
shall be constructed to divert surface water around the mound structure as much as possible. In addition, an up
Page 2 of 2
June 1, 2005
Christensen Property
I
slope drainage ditch should be considered if it is determined that surface or subsurface hydrology is improved by
intercepting water and diverting it away from the mound site.
If there are any questions regarding this report, please contact me.
eroy GIn sky, W water S cialist
Ljansky mmerc . tate.wi.u E-mail
715/726-2544 Voice 7151726-2549 Fax
cc: County ❑ Plumber [N CST ❑ Owner ❑ Other