Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout008-1096-10-000 y ! Safety and Buildings 0541N RANCH ROAD commerceml.gov AYWARD WI 54843 RECEIVED DD (608) 264-8777 sco sin.go / isconsin .commerce www.wisconin.gov Department of Commerce im Doyle, Governor ;7 , C;ROiX COUNTY Ma P. Burke, Secretary September 22, 2005 CUST ID No. 46672 ATTN: POWTS Inspector ZONING OFFICE MARK W IVERSON ST CROIX COUNTY SPIA PO BOX 155 1101 CARMICHAEL RD HAMMOND WI 54015 HUDSON WI 54016 CONDITIONAL APPROVAL Identification Numbers PLAN APPROVAL EXPIRES: 09/22/2007 Transaction ID No. 1199077 SITE: Aaron & Rebecca Dennis Site ID No. 705110 Town of Eau Galle, St Croix County Please refer to both identification numbers, NE 1/4, SW 1/4, S34, T28N, R16W above, in all correspondence with the agency. FOR: Object Type: Soil Saturation Determination Regulated Object ID No.: 1041767 The submittal described above has been reviewed for conformance with applicable Wisconsin Administrative Codes and Wisconsin Statutes. The submittal has been CONDITIONALLY APPROVED. The owner, as defined in chapter 101.01(10), Wisconsin Statutes, is responsible for compliance with all code requirements. The following conditions shall be met during construction or installation and prior to occupancy or use: 1. Approval is hereby granted pursuant to s. Comm 85.60(2), Wis. Adm. Code, to estimate the depth to seasonal soil saturation based on an interpretive determination process. Approval of the interpretive determination negates the requirement in s. Comm 85.30(2)(b), Wis. Adm. Code to designate the ground surface as the higest level of soil saturation when redoximorphic features are less than 4 inches below the bottom of the A horizon. 2. The estimated highest level of prolonged soil saturation approved under this determination is 11 inches below grade. At least 25 inches of sand lift on top of 11 inches of unsaturated, in-situ soil is required for adequate treatment and dispersal. 3. The basal soil application rate for the mound shall be 0.20 gpd/sf, and the linear loading rate 4.50 gpd/ft. 4. Chisel plowing to a depth of 14 inches immediately prior to sand placement is required to improve vertical water movement into the soil solum. 5. Landscaping up slope of the mound shall be incorporated into the POWTS design to prevent surface water from concentrating along the up slope edge of the mound and to divert surface water drainage away from the system. 6. This approval shall remain valid unless the site is altered in such a way that the depth to soil saturation would change or if saturated conditions are observed for seven consecutive days at depths less than 3 feet below the infiltrative surface of the POWTS distribution component. 7. This approval in no way relinquishes the use of color patterns to estimate the depth to high groundwater on any other parcels or portions of parcels. 8. A copy of this approval letter and attachments must accompany the mound system design for this site for purposes of plan approval and sanitary permit issuance. If the Interpretive Determination Report was accompanied with a plan and an expiration date is shown on this letter, the expiration date only applies to the plans for the design, not to the decision on the Interpretive Determination Report. * MARK W IVERSON Page 2 9/22/2005 A copy of the approved plans, specifications and this letter shall be on-site during construction and open to inspection by authorized representatives of the Department, which may include local inspectors. If plan index sheets were submitted in lieu of additional full plansets, a copy of this approval letter and index sheet shall be attached to plans that correspond with the copy on file with the Department. All permits required by the state or the local municipality shall be obtained prior to commencement of construction/installation/operation. In granting this approval the Division of Safety & Buildings reserves the right to require changes or additions should conditions arise making them necessary for code compliance. As per state stats 101.12(2), nothing in this review shall relieve the designer of the responsibility for designing a safe building, structure, or component. Inquiries concerning this correspondence may be made to me at the telephone number listed below, or at the address on this letterhead. Sincerely, Fee Required $ 100.00 Fee Received $ 100.00 Balance Due $ 0.00 eroy G. ansky, P, S , Waste a er Specialist iSMART code: 7633 Integrated Services Bureau W (715)726-2544 Voice (715)726-2549 Fax ljansky@commerce.state.wi.us r , INTERPRETIVE DETERMINATION REPORT Property Owner: P.O.W.T.S. Aaron & Rebecca Dennis Conditionally 514 Raymond Street APPROVED Somerset, WI 54025 DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE DIV SOON OF SAFETY AND BUILDINGS ~ 9 9 ® 7 7 i J~ SEE RRESP DENC Site Location: NE 1/4 of the SW '/4, Sec. 34, Town 28N, Range 16W Town of Eau Galle St. Croix County Prepared by: i Mark Iverson, PSS #197, CST #46672 September 19, 2005 Date Evergreen Irrigation Inc. Mark Iverson, Professional Soil Scientist P.O. Box 155 Hammond, WI 54015 Phone: 715-796-5664 Fax: 715-796-5246 RECEIVED SEP 2 1 2005 SAFETY & BLDGS. DIV. TABLE OF CONTENTS 1. Introduction I II. Project Information I III. Method 2 IV. Discussion of Results 2 A. Local Hydrology 2 B. Geomorphology 2 C. Soil Disturbance and Hydraulic Modifications 3 D. Landscape Position and Local Topography 3 E. Soil Series and Mapping Units 3 F. Additional Data 5 G. Comparative Analysis 5 H. Government Reports and Comments 6 V. Conclusions and Recommendations 6 VI. References 7 TABLES Table I - Soil Series Characteristics Table 2 - Hydric Soil Classification FIGURES Figure I - USGS Topographic Map Figure 2 - Soil Map APPENDICES Appendix A - Soil Evaluation Report I. INTRODUCTION On August 20, 2005 and September 16, 2005 Mark Iverson, Professional Soil Scientist #197 and Certified Soil Tester #46672, completed an Interpretive Onsite Soils Evaluation. An interpretive evaluation is required because the site does not meet the requirements to install a new private on-site waste treatment system (POWTS) through completion of a conventional onsite soils evaluation (<A+4 inches of acceptable soil is present). The onsite evaluation was completed through the observation of the soil profiles at seven hand dug test pit locations. This report has been prepared to present the results of an interpretive determination completed to determine site suitability for installation of a POWTS. The evaluation was completed at the request of the landowner, Rebecca Dennis. The evaluation was completed to identify a location to site a POWTS for new construction. The property is located south of Woodville on the east side of Co. Hwy. BB. Mark Iverson completed a preliminary evaluation on August 17, 2005. The preliminary evaluation included the Northeast 20 acres of the property and concluded that A+4 soils were not present on the site. The interpretive determination was completed as the most suitable location on the site for installation of a POWTS. No data from the preliminary assessment has been included. A conditional approval was issued for an interpretive evaluation report completed for the 20 acre parcel on August 22, 2005. The proposed system was within the power line easement. The time frame to approve construction of a system within the easement area was not acceptable to the purchasers; therefore an alternate area was evaluated and has been documented in this report. The entire parcel consists of 60 acres. Henry Grote completed a soil evaluation for the Southeast 20 acre parcel in November 1999. The landowner indicated that an evaluation was completed for the Northwest 20 acres and suitable soils were not identified. II. PROJECT INFORMATION The following is site-specific background information, which has been collected: Property Owner: Aaron & Rebecca Dennis 514 Raymond Street Somerset, WI 54025 715-247-5491 Site Location: NE '/4 of the SW '/4, Sec. 34, Town 28N, Range 16W Parcel ID # 008-1096-10-000 Town of Eau Galle St. Croix County 1 Historic Land Use: Agriculture Crop Production / Fallow Current Land Use: Fallow Vegetation: The vegetation within the proposed system area includes primarily miscellaneous grasses, milkweed, and goldenrod. III. METHOD This interpretive evaluation and report was completed following the guidelines set forth in Comm 85.60(2) of the Wisconsin Administrative Code and in the summary provided by Leroy Jansky titled, "Preparing the Interpretive Determination Report" (March 13, 2002). IV. DISCUSSION OF RESULTS A. Local Hydrology 1. Surface Water Drainage Patterns - Surface water drainage is uniform over the proposed system area. No areas of concentrated flow were identified. The site contours are shown on the site map included in Appendix A. 2. Subsurface Water Drainage - The silt loam texture and moderate soil structure offer good infiltration for the typical rain event. During frozen conditions and following heavy precipitation events, runoff will likely be much greater. The moderate structure of that Ap does allow for lateral movement within the surface horizon. 3. Artificial Drainage Devices - No artificial drainage devices were observed during the completion of the evaluation. 4. Contributing Drainage Area - There is minimal area upslope that contributes surface water to the system area (See the figure in Attachment A). 5. Soil Saturation - Saturated soil was not encountered during completion of the test pits identified on the figure included as Attachment A. The depths of the test pits within the system area were 22 to 24 inches below grade. 6. Surface Water Elevations- Surface water features near the site have been identified on Figure 1. No intermittent streams or other surface water features were identified in the general vicinity of the site. B. Geomorphology 1. Parent Material - The parent material is loess over glacial till. 2. Landform Type - The proposed system area is positioned on the shoulder slope of a till plain. The general slope shape in the vicinity of the proposed system area is convex - convex. 3. Slope Aspect - The slope aspect with in the proposed system area is approximately NNW at 295 degrees. 4. Surface Elevation - The surface elevation is near 1240 feet msl. 2 C. Soil Disturbance and Hydraulic Modifications The proposed system location is in a fallow field. The proposed system location has not been disturbed by cutting or filling. No hydraulic modifications, such as drain tile or ditches, were observed at the time of the assessment. No additional surface water is received from impervious surfaces. D. Landscape Position and Local Topography The regional topography is shown on figure 1. The general direction of slope within the proposed system area is to the West - Northwest. The ground surface elevation is approximately 1240 feet mean sea level (msl) within the vicinity of the proposed system. The topography within the proposed system area is shown on the site map included in Attachment A. FIGURE 1-TUSGS TOPOGRAPHI=C MAP r 1 d a _ -4-240 E. Soil Series and Mapping Units The Soil Survey of St. Croix County maps the soils on the Dennis property as Clyde (Cy), Santiago (Sa), and Skyberg (Sr). The location of each soil type is identified on Figure 2. The primary soil characteristics as described in the series description are identified on the Table 1. Table 2 identifies the wetland indicator status of all soil mapped on the property as identified in the USDA - NRCS Technical Guide - Hydric Soil Interpretations and in US Army Corp of Engineers (USACOE) hydric soils list. Clyde (CyA) is a hydric soils and Skyberg (SrA) may have inclusions of Auburndale, which is hydric. 3 II, MAP FIGURE 2 - SO s a a'w. s Z on a Rebecca Derxxs E'- ,09 006-1 oss-204000 & Rebecca Cemis r~ f cei V* 008-109&10-" vae r~ 5Y<4wn is `s Ltsrxla~tY , -A v4 &A ~ SaC2 1XI The red lines represent parcel boundaries. TABLE 1- SOIL SERIES CHARACTERISTICS Texture Parent Material Permeability Soil A E or B Drainage Series Horizon Horizon Surface Subsurf Surface Subsurf. CL/SIC Glacial Class Cy SICL L/SL/L Outwash Till MS MS P or VP Sa SIL SIL/SL Loess Till* M S to MS W Sr SIL SIL/SICL Loess Till MS or S MS ors SP Abbreviations Permeability IM = Impermeable MS = Moderately Slow RA = Rapid VS = Very Slow M = Moderate VR = Very Rapid S = Slow MR = Moderately Rapid Drainage Class VP = Very Poorly W = Well P = Poorly SE = Somewhat Excessively SP = Somewhat Poorly E = Excessively MW = Moderately Well 4 Table 2 - H dric Soil Classifications NRCS - USDA Soil Series Component Inclusions USACOE C Yes H dric Yes Sa No None No Sr No Auburndale No Component soils are soils that are hydric. If inclusions are identified, small pockets of the hydric soils listed may be present within the soil series. F. Field Observations The soils identified during the completion of the test pits closely resemble the Santiago series except that redoximorphic features were observed in the B- horizon. Redoximorphic features were observed primarily as Fe concentrations and iron depletions in the B-horizon. Redoximorphic features were observed in the B- horizon as f-1-f to c-2-d features at 11 to 13 inches below surface in borings within the proposed system area. The redox features observed in the B-horizon can be attributed to short-term seasonal saturation caused by slow permeability. The short-term seasonal saturation is a result of the dense glacial till present at depth. The soil on site does not meet the hydric soil criteria. The lack of hydric soils indicates that the soil is likely not saturated for greater than 5% of the growing season (approximately 7 consecutive days). The lack of these features does not precluded the possibility that the soil is saturated to or near the surface prior to the growing season or for shorter periods of time during the growing season. G. Comparative Analysis Soil boring (B-7) was completed down slope to determine if the soil conditions were uniform throughout the site and if additional surface water received down slope had any impact on the soil characteristics. The results of the soil evaluation indicate that the soil down slope has redoximorphic features at 5 inches below surface. Redoximorphic features are present a little higher in the soil profile as would be expected at a lower topographic position. During the preliminary soil evaluation, soil borings were also completed northwest and north of the proposed system area. Redox features were observed at these locations within the A horizon. The redox features were more prominent and also included oxidized root channels in the A horizon. 5 H. Government Reports and Comments A DCOMM approval letter has been issued for installation of a system within the area of B-1, B-2, and B-3. Installation of a system at this location would require approval from Xcel Energy to install a system within the power line easement. V. Conclusions and Recommendations The site is suitable for installation of a POWTS (mound system) for the following reasons: 1.) Redoximorphic features were not observed in the A or E horizons (A+3). 2.) Hydric soils are not present within the proposed system area. 3.) There are no features that concentrate surface water flow toward the proposed location of the system. 4.) The slope at the proposed system location is approximately 4 to 7%. The slope is uniform with no dips or valleys. The following recommendations should be considered during installation of the proposed system: 1.) The system should be installed on the 101.8' contour to stay within the tested area. 2.) Sand fill shall consist of 25" of material meeting ASTM C-33 specifications. 3.) Four inches of sand should be placed on the system area immediately prior to chisel plowing. 4.) Chisel plowing must be completed to a minimum depth of 14 inches to realign the platy structure at 9 to 12 inches. 5.) The basal loading rate shall not exceed 0.2 GPD/ft2 for EFF#1. 6.) The system shall be designed to have a linear loading rate of 4.5 GPD/ft or less. 7.) The system will follow the 101.8' contour and have a slightly upslope concave shape. 8.) Due to the upslope concave shape of the system and the potential to receive surface water from upslope, a surface water diversion is recommended upslope of the proposed POWTS. The final approval of this site must be made by the Wisconsin Department of Commerce and the St. Croix County Zoning Department. This report represents the observations and professional opinion of Mark Iverson, Professional Soil Scientist (#197) and Certified Soil Tester (#46672). 6 VI. REFERENCES 1.) United States. United States Department of Agriculture Soil Conservation Service, in cooperation with Research division of the College of Agriculture and Life Sciences University of Wisconsin. Soil Survey of St. Croix County, Wisconsin. 1978. 2.) State of Wisconsin. Department of Commerce Code, Chapters 83 and 85. 3.) US Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service. 1996. Field Indicators of Hydric Soils in the United States. G.W Hurt, Whited, P.M., and Pringle, R.F. (eds,). USDA, NRCS, Fort Worth, TX. 4.) Schoeneberger, P.J., Wysocki, D.A., Benham, E.C., and Broderson, W.D. (editors), 2002. Field book for describing and sampling soils, Version 2.0. Natural Resources Conservation Service, National Soil Survey Center, Lincoln, NE. 5.) United States. Us Geological Survey. Topographical downloaded from 6.) St. Croix County. St. Croix County Land Information System. 7.) United States. United States Department of Agriculture - Natural Resources Conservation Service. Hydric Soil List for St. Croix County, Wisconsin. i° 8.) United States. Us Army Corps of Engineers. 1987. Corp of Engineers Wetland Delineation Manual, Technical Report Y-87-1. USAEWES Environmental Laboratory, Vicksburg, MS. 7 APPENDIX A SOIL EVALUATION REPORT g ' Wisconsin Department of Commerce SOIL AT ON Page 1 of 4 Division of Safety and Buildings In accordance Attach complete site plan on paper not less than 8'/a x 11 in 4 rdy St. Croix Include but not limited to: vertical and horizontal reference point (BMA on and Fame] I Percent slope, scale or dimensions, north arrow, and BM referenced to n ear road 8- 096-10-000 ew by Please print all information R 1 evi Date Personal information you provide may be used for secondary purposes (Privacy Law, OFFi! 4 Property 0 i Property Owner Property Location Aaron & Rebecca Dennis c,.A Lot NE Y. SW s 34 T 28 N R 16 w Property Owner's Mailing Address Lot # Block # Subd Name or CSM# 2487 2514 Raymond Street city state zip code Phone 0 City ❑ Village H Town Nearest Road Somerset W1 54025 715-247-5491 Eau Galle BB H New Construction Use: ® Residential / Number of Bedrooms 3 (assumed) Code derived design flow rate 450 GPD ❑ Replacement ❑ Public or Commercial - Describe: Parent Material loess over Glacial till Flood Plain elevation if applicable NA ft. General comments and recommendations: The system area includes the area within B-1, B-5, and B-6. Boring Boring # H Pit Ground Surface Elevation 101.8 ft. Depth to Limiting factor 11 in. Soil Application Rate Horizon Depth Dominant Color Redox Description Texture Structure Consistence Boundary Roots GPD/ftz in. Munsell Qu. Sz. Colt. Color Gr. SZ. Sh. *Eff#1 *Eff#2 1 0-4 10YR3/3 None SIL 24 to m-gr mfr cs 3f 0.6 0.8 2 4-9 10YR3/3 None SIL 2-m-sbk mfr as 2f 0.6 0.8 4 9-11 10YR5/3 None SIL 2-m-pi mfi CS 1f 0.0 0.2 5 11-20 10YR4/6 f-1 -d 7.5YR416810YR5/3 FSL 2-m-sbk mfr 9s 1f 0.4 0.8 6 20-24+ 7.5YR4/4 f-1 -f 7.5YR4/6 GRSL 1-c-sbk mfr - 1f 0.6 1.0 Boring # 1 Boring Pit Ground Surface Elevation 101.9 ft. Depth to Limiting factor 12 in. Soil Application Rate Horizon Depth Dominant Color Redox Description Texture Stricture Consistence Boundary Roots GPD/fe in. MunseY Qu. Sz. Cont. Color Gr. Sz. Sh. *Eff#1 *Eff#2 1 0-3 10YR3/3 None SIL 2-f-gr mfr CS 3f 0.6 0.8 2 3-9 10YR3/3 None SIL 2-f-sbk mfr as 2f 0.6 0.8 4 9-12 10YR4/3 None SL 1-m-pl mfr CS 1f 0.4 0.6 5 12-18 10YR4/4 c-1 -f 7.5YR4/4 & 10YR5/3 GRSL 2-m-sbk mfr gS 1 f 0.6 1.0 6 18-25+ 7.5YR4/4 f-1-d7.5 YR4/6 & 10YR5r3 GRSL 2-m-sbk mfr - if 0.6 1.0 Effluent #1 = BOD5> 30:5 220 mg/L and TSS > 30!5 150 mg/l, * Effluent #2 = BOD5 5 30 mg/L and TSS 30 mg/L CST Name (Please Print) Sigoatwe CST Number Mark Iverson 46672 Address Date Evaluation Conducted Telephone Number P.O. Box 155 Hammond, WI 54015 August 20, 2005 & September 16, 2005 715-796-5664 Property Owner Aaron & Rebecca. Dennis Parcel m# 008-1096-10-000 Page --2 -of 4 Boring # ❑ Boring OPit Ground Surface Elevation 100.7 ft. Depth to Limiting factor 12 in. Soil Application Rate Horizon Depth Dominant Color Redox Description Texture Structure Consistence Boundary Roots GPD/ft2 in. Munsell Qu. Sz. Cont. Color Gr. Sz. Sh. *Eff#1 *Eff#2 1 0-3 10YR3/3 None SIL 2-m-gr mfr Cs 3f 0.6 0.8 2 3-9 10YR3/3 None SIL 2-m-sbk mfr as 2f 0.6 0.8 3 9-12 10YR5/3 None FSL 1-Co-PI mfr Cs 1f 0.2 0.6 4 12-19 7.5YR4/4 f-1-d7.5YR4/6& 1 0YR5J3 GRSL 2-m-sbk mfr gs 1f 0.6 1.0 5 19-24+ 7.5YR4/4 f-1-d 10YR5/3 GRSL 1-m-sbk mfr - if 0.4 0.7 4] Boring # 0 Boring OPit Ground Surface Elevation 99.0 ft. Depth to Limiting factor 9 -in. Soil A lication Rate Horizon Depth Dominant Color Redox Description Texture Structure Consistence Boundary Roots GPDM2 in. Munsell Qu. Sz. Cont. Color Gr. Sz. Sh. *Eff#1 *Eff#2 1 0-4 10YR3/3 None SIL 2-f-gr mfr Cs 3f 0.6 0.8 2 4-9 10YR3/3 None SIL 2-m-sbk mfr as 2f 0.6 0.8 3 9-12 10YR5/3 f-1-f 7.5YR4/6 FSL 1-m-pi mfr gs if 0.2 0.6 4 12-17 10YR4/4 f-1-f 7.5YR4/6 GRSL 2-m-sbk mfr gs if 0.6 1.0 5 17-24+ 7.5YR4/4 f-1-f 7.5YR4/6 & 10YR414 GRSL 2-c-sbk mfi - 1 f 0.6 1.0 Boring # 0 Boring OPit Ground SurfaceElevation 101.7 ft. Depth to Limiting factor 13 in. Soil Application Rate Horizon Depth Dominant Color Redox Description Texture Structure Consistence Boundary Roots GPD/ft2 in. Munsell Qu. Sz. Cont. Color Gr. Sz. Sh. *Eff#1 *Eff#2 1 0-3 10YR3/3 None SIL 2-f-gr mfr Cs 3f 0.6 0.8 2 3-10 10YR3/3 None SIL 2-m-sbk mfr as 2f 0.6 0.8 3 10-13 10YR4/4 None FSL 2-f-pl mfr gs 1f 0.0 0.2 4 13-22+ 10YR4/4 c-2-1 7.5YR5/8 a 10YR5/2 SL 2-f-pi mfr - 1f 0.0 0.2 s Effluent #1 = BOD5 > 30:5 220 mg/L and TSS > 30<_ 150 mg/L * Effluent #2 = BOD5 < 30 mg/L and TSS 30 mg/L The Department of Commerce is an equal opportunity, service provider and employer. If you need assistance to access services or Need material in an alternate format, please contact the department at 608-266-3151 or TTY 608-264-8777. Property Owner Aaron & Rebecca Dennis Parcel ID# 008-1096-10-000 Page 3 of 4 [-6] Boring # 0 Boring Wit Ground Surface Elevation 100.5 ft. Depth to Limiting factor 13 in. Sail Application Rate Horizon Depth Dominant Color Redox Description Texture Stnxture Consistence Boundary Roots GPD/ft2 in. Murrell Qu. Sz. Cont. Color Gr. Sz. Sh_ *Eff#1 *Eff#2 1 0-5 10YR3/3 None SIL 2-f-gr mfr CS 3f 0.6 0.8 2 5-10 10Y-R3/3 None SIL 2-m-sbk mfr as 2f 0.6 0.8 3 10-13 10YR4/4 None SIL 1-m-PI mfr CS if 0.4 0.6 4 13-21+ 10YR4/4 f-1-f 7.5YR416 SL 1-m-sbk mfr - if 0.4 0.7 Boring # 0 Boring HPit Ground Surface Elevation 98.4 ft_ Depth to Limiting factor 5 in. Sal Application Rate Horizon Depth Dominant Color Redox Description Texture Structure Consistence Boundary Roots GPD/ftz in. Munsell Qu. Sz. Cont. Color Gr. Sz. Sh. *Eff#1 *Eff#2 1 0-5 10YR3/3 None SIL 2-f-gr mfr cs 2f 0.6 0.8 2 5-9 10YR4/3 f-1-f 7.5YR3/3 SIL 2-m-pl mfr as 2f 0.0 0.2 3 9-12 10YR5/3 a2-d 10YR5/2 & 7.5YR4/6 FSL 1-co-PI Mfr CIS If 0.4 0.6 4 12-20+ 7.5YR4/4 c-2-d 10YR52 & 7.5YR4/6 SL 2-m-sbk mfr - if 0.6 1.0 r-I ❑ Boring Boring # Opit Ground Surface Elevation ft. Depth to Limiting factor in. Soil Application Rate Horizon Depth Dominant Color Redox Description Texture Structure Consistence Boundary Roots GPD/ftz in. MurseN Qu_ Sz. Cont. Color Gr. Sz. Sh. *Eff#1 *Eff#2 s Effluent #1 = BOD5> 30 < 220 mg/L and TSS > 30:5 150 mg/L Effluent #2 = BOD5 < 30 mg/L and TSS < 30 mg/L The Department of Commerce is an equal opporhlmty service provider and employer. If you need assistance to access services or Need material in an alternate format, please contact the department at 608-266-3151 or TTY 608-264-8777. Page 3 of 3 0 ft. 24 ft. 40 ft. 80 ft. N The north property boundary is greater than 500 north of BM#2 Site Location 10th Ave i s m PP Sect on 34 #602 X U ~ O L c)) Pierce/St. Croix Rd. 101 N ; place system on o i the 101.8' contour N % B-5 ~ a 101.7' < h ami iP 'p ip ';p rn Sao io io io io i111 B-7 4 ~p ie ,w ca o 98.4 e ie 'e ' B-s ~ N it :r ,r m 100.5 -2 ' 0 3 1 Q .9 n o I I ° (D o o c in in M in W e e ie + e is s s 6 B-1 B-3 Ne~• 7~ T 101.8' 100.7' to op 41 AV 34 Pi 000 a pe 0' N Wi Proposed south erty bou ary PP #21 The current property line is greater than 500 feet south of BM#1 The proposed system area is located in a vacant field PP = Powerpole Powerline Eas ment BM# & Description =Bench Mark Elevation 100, = Boring Location & Elevation House and well location to be determined Owner: Aaron & Rebecca Dennis Site Information: Completed By: Mark Iverson, PSS #197 514 Raymond Street NE 1/4, SW 1/4, S34, T28N, R16W 680 Larcom Street Somerset, WI 54025 Town of Eau Galle Hammond, WI 54015 St. Croix County 715-796-5664 Phone: 715-247-5491 CST# 46672 1 commerce.wi.gov SAFETY AND BUILDINGS DIVISION Integrated Services Bureau 13 East Spruce Street isconsin INSPECTION REPORT Chippewa Falls, WI 54729 www.commerce.wi.gov/sb Department of commerce (715) 726-2544 Date of Inspection: August 24, 2005 Plumber Name and Address: Project Name: Dennis NA Use: Residential Legal Description: NE, SW, 34, 28, 16W Site Number: 703843 Subdivision: NA Certified Soil Tester Name and Address: Municipality: Town of Eau Galle Mark W. Iverson, CST 46672 County: St. Croix PO Box 155 Hammond, WI 54015-0155 Plan Transaction Number: 1190322 Sanitary Permit Number: NA Owner Name and Address: Aaron & Rebecca Dennis Wastewater Flow: 450-600 gpd 514 Raymond Street Persons Present: M. Iverson Somerset, WI 54025 An onsite soils verification was conducted at the above referenced site as per district policy for all sites with less than four inches of unsaturated soil below the bottom of the A horizon. The intent of this investigation is to confirm initial observations by the certified soil tester (CST) relating to the presence or absence of redoximorphic features in the A horizon and/or subsoil. In-situ soil texture, structure, and consistence factors were also reviewed as they relate to wastewater application rates. Other site conditions such as percent and direction of slope, landscape position, land surface contour length, and surface water hydrology may also be noted and their effects are factors considered in the recommendations and conclusions portion of this report. The soils verification conducted this date is generally in agreement with the report filed by the CST dated August 20, 2005. No redox features were observed in the A horizon and subsoil conditions appear slightly better (A+3 dryer) than those initially reported by the CST. Report revision will be submitted. If a mound system is designed to overcome limitations of a high level of seasonal soil saturation and slow permeability, the linear loading rate should. not exceed 4.5 gpd/ft and the basal wastewater application rated should not exceed 0.2 gpd/ftz. The additional basal area will partially compensate for the gentle land slope and prevent wastewater leakage at the mound toe. At least 25 inches of sand lift is recommended when applying septic tank effluent to the distribution cell of the mound to ensure proper treatment. The longest portion of the mound must be orientated along the contour. The mound shall be constructed to divert surface water around the mound structure as much as possible. In addition, an up slope drainage ditch should be considered if it is determined that surface or subsurface hydrology is improved by intercepting water and diverting it away from the mound site. If there are any questions regarding this report, please contact me. L roy G. Ja ky, Wast ater Sp alist cc: [9 County ❑ Plumber Ljansky@c merce.state.wi.us -mail ® CST ❑ Owner 715/726-2544 Voice 715/726-2549 Fax ❑ Other L 't Wisconsin Department of Industry, SOIL AND SITE EVALUATION Labor and Human Relations Page / of Division of Safety and Buildings in accordance w' s.`11 L;J-tR` 83:09, Wl§:, t `f 4,1 Attach complete site plan on paper not less than 81/2 x 11 'nche (in jiz 48n musty r i,.f; County Include, but not limited to: vertical and horizontal reference 'point (BM), it on and r CioO~ percent slope, scale or dimensions, north arrow, and location and dista Fe`,C~ ne t roa . 000 C/ ST CRUX l b - /G Z O APPLICANT INFORMATION - Please print all informati n: ` coirrrTY Revised y Date Personal information you provi a us f s ondary purposes (Privacy Law, , 15. 1~ Property Owner ' r~ v Go Ytf y 1/4 1/4,S7 T .2f ,N,R, AP E (or)© Property Owner's Mailing Address Lot # Block# Subd. Name or CSM# of q -2 33 7 aje IN. O1= 11_~1044Gr (G S City State Zip Code Phone Number Nearest Road 76, [:1 City [:1 Village Town C,,y l/&s Qj.; ff-New Construction Use: esidential / Number of bedrooms J Addition to existing building ❑ Replacement ❑ Public or commercial - Describe: Code derived daily flow gpd Recommended design loading rate bed, gpd/ft2rench, gpd/ft2 Absorption area required Tl~bed, ft2_5'i trench, ft2 Maximum design loading rate bed, gpd/ft2 ,e- trench, gpd/ft2 Recommended infiltration surface elevation(s) ft (as referred to site plan benchmark) Additional design/kite considerations &P ~i Jr 743772SYS7~-C1s Parent material fln+l' S/L 1,045 0&9EX / EV,fE Flood plain elevation, if applicable ft S = Suitable for system Conventiioonaall Mound In-Ground Pres a AT-Grade U System in Fill Holding TU = Unsuitable for system ❑ S 9 U ❑ S Le U ❑ S U ❑ S ❑ S I I El S SOIL DESCRIPTION REPORT Boring # Horizon Depth Dominant Color Mottles Structure GPD/ft2 in. Munsell Qu. Sz. Cont. Color Texture Gr. Sz. Sh. Consistence Boundary Roots Bed Trench -3 o • y ,/aye 3/y eL ds s z . z ; .3 ~dy~ C2~ Hors s/L 2. Y A& d5, X -15 . s ; Z 7 -7. C VIP Ground 3 /ey1f 51 GL 0 ,~7"/• ti, elev. - /01 C!`Z Depth to limiting fain. 14 40 SS / ST s No 5'5S• Remarks: :=5A40 7- eV,1,SV AAAP-e f 14 t i/` AG/E' • l/J1 .Z OD Boring # 10-41 IOXX314-1 - 51L 2 rlS5,6C' GPS 4S .Zf •S ; . 2 - 11A us 3 P 4015 S/ GG 4l" IMx_161' Ground ~`2- elev. 7/ 6' Depth to limiting factor /0 In. Remarks: CST Name (Please Print) Signature Telephone No. RaBe"je r 21l-~/~%CLa7- 71S- 396 - WR5 Address Date CST Number dC~ • is • az.Ce3'7S Private Sewage Consultants 665 O'Neil Rd. Hudson, Wis. 54016 Sons S r r ' tA' SOIL DESCRIPTION REPORT Z 3 PROPERTY OWNER Page of PARCEL I.D.# 2 Boring # Horizon Depth Dominant Color Mottles Texture Structure Consistence Boundary Roots G~ /ft in. Munsell Qu. Sz. Cont. Color Gr. Sz. Sh. Bed ; Trench - /L /~S s C Z ~ •Z , • 3 3 a viq /o yip 3y ',7 61 Ground 7•.S (j• elev. CG O, - N ft. 3 /5'• /o yc' s/ Depth to limiting factor in. Remarks: Boring # Ground elev. ft. , Depth to limiting factor in. Remarks: Horizon Depth Dominant Color Mottles Texture Structure Consistence Boundary Roots GPD/ft2 in. Munsell Qu. Sz. Cont. Color Gr. Sz. Sh. Bed , Trench Boring # Ground EE 1--lo, elev. ft. Depth to , limiting factor in. Remarks: Boring # Ground elev. ft. Depth to limiting factor in. Remarks: SBDW-8330 (R. 08/95) - -r ItIo. ~ • Ulbitcht ssoclates Ots PI& * sewage consuita wW O'Neil R. 05 n, Wis. 54016 ' csT ~3 33 7 193 57 lei $IN 03 Sf~4-LE: ~ = yD (3y so. PAP. Gigue v Fav~ o 7AI Sys r aAop zt-~ Aj. 313 -