Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout018-1000-20-200 Parcel 018-1000-20-200 02/15/2008 02:56 PM PAGE 1 OF 1 Alt. Parcel 01.29.17.2A-100 018 - TOWN OF HAMMOND Current X ST. CROIX COUNTY, WISCONSIN Creation Date Historical Date Map # Sales Area Application # Permit # Permit Type 11/17/2006 00 0 Tax Address: Owner(s): 0 = Current Owner, C = Current Co-Owner 0 - AULT, KAREN S KAREN S AULT 1965 15TH AVE NW ST PAUL MN 55112 Districts: SC = School SP = Special Property Address(es): Primary Type Dist # Description " 2050 117TH AVE SC 0231 BALDWIN-WOODVILLE AREA SP 1700 WITC Legal Description: Acres: 4.120 Plat: 5311-CSM 22-5311 018-06 SEC 01 T29N R1 7W PT SW/NE & GOV LOTS 2 & Block/Condo Bldg: LOT 01 3 & INC CSM VOL 2/445 FKA CSM 16/4328 LOT 1 24.342AC BEING CSM 22-5311 LOT 1 Tract(s): (Sec-Twn-Rng 40 1/4 160 1/4) (4.12 AC) 01-29N-17W NW NE Notes: Parcel History: Date Doc # Vol/Page Type 11/22/2006 839345 WD 11/17/2006 838992 22/5311 CSM 04/23/2004 760451 2555/259 WD 04/23/2004 760450 2555/258 mor 2008 SUMMARY Bill Fair Market Value: Assessed with: 0 Valuations: Last Changed: 07/19/2007 Description Class Acres Land Improve Total State Reason RESIDENTIAL G1 4.120 32,400 0 32,400 NO Totals for 2008: General Property 4.120 32,400 0 32,400 Woodland 0.000 0 0 Totals for 2007: General Property 4.120 32,400 0 32,400 Woodland 0.000 0 0 Lottery Credit: Claim Count: 0 Certification Date: Batch Specials: User Special Code Category Amount Special Assessments Special Charges Delinquent Charges Total 0.00 0.00 0.00 f Safety and Buildings commercemi.gov RECEIVED 10541N RANCH ROAD HAYWARD WI 54843 ■ TDD (608) 264-8777 iscon'sin AU G 3 1 2006 www.commerce.wi.gov/sb/ www.wisconsin.gov Department of Commeree ST. CROIX COUNTY Jim Doyle, Governor Mary P. Burke, Secretary August 22, 2006 CUST ID No. 227387 ATTN: POWTS Inspector THOMAS C NELSON ZONING OFFICE ENVIRONMENTAL BY DESIGN ST CROIX COUNTY SPIA 1432 120TH ST 1101 CARMICHAEL RD NEW RICHMOND WI 54017 HUDSON WI 54016 CONDITIONAL APPROVAL PLAN APPROVAL EXPIRES: 08/22/2008 Identification Numbers Transaction ID No. 1309689 SITE: D & A Properties Inc tars 1-3 Aa.POWp Cyr Site ID No. 716819 Town of Hammond, St Croix County V5 1. 2-2 I Please refer to both identification numbers, SW 1/4, NE 1/4, S1, T29N, R17W above, in all correspondence with theagency. FOR: Object Type: Soil Saturation Determination Regulated Object ID No.: 1091568 The submittal described above has been reviewed for conformance with applicable Wisconsin Administrative Codes and Wisconsin Statutes. The submittal has been CONDITIONALLY APPROVED. The owner, as defined in chapter 101.01(10), Wisconsin Statutes, is responsible for compliance with all code requirements. The following conditions shall be met during construction or installation and prior to occupancy or use: 1. Approval is hereby granted pursuant to s. Comm 85.60(2), Wis. Adm. Code, to estimate the depth to seasonal soil saturation based on an interpretive determination process. Approval of the interpretive determination negates the requirement in s. Comm 85.30(2)(b), Wis. Adm. Code to designate the ground surface as the highest level of soil saturation when redoximorphic features are less than 4 inches below the bottom of the A horizon. 2. The estimated highest level of prolonged soil saturation approved under this determination is 6 inches below grade. At least 30 inches of sand lift on top of 6 inches of unsaturated, in-situ soil is required for adequate treatment and dispersal. 3. The basal soil application rate for the mound shall be 0.20 gpd/sf, and the linear loading rate 4.5 gpd/ft. 4. Chisel plowing to a depth of 15 inches immediately prior to sand placement is required to improve vertical water movement into the soil solum. 5. Landscaping up slope of the mound shall be incorporated into the POWTS design to prevent surface water from concentrating along the up slope edge of the mound and to divert surface water drainage away from the system. 6. This approval shall remain valid unless the site is altered in such a way that the depth to soil saturation would change or if saturated conditions are observed for seven consecutive days at depths less than 3 feet below the infiltrative surface of the POWTS distribution component. 7. This approval in no way relinquishes the use of color patterns to estimate the depth to high groundwater on any other parcels or portions of parcels. 8. A copy of this approval letter and attachments must accompany the mound system design for this site for purposes of plan approval and sanitary permit issuance. If the Interpretive Determination Report was accompanied with a plan and an expiration date is shown on this letter, the expiration date only applies to the plans for the design, not to the decision on the Interpretive Determination Report. I THOMAS C NELSON Page 2 8/22/2006 A copy of the approved plans, specifications and this letter shall be on-site during construction and open to inspection by authorized representatives of the Department, which may include local inspectors. If plan index sheets were submitted in lieu of additional full plansets, a copy of this approval letter and index sheet shall be attached to plans that correspond with the copy on file with the Department. All permits required by the state or the local municipality shall be obtained prior to commencement of construction/installation/operatbn. If this construction project will disturb one or more acres of land, an Erosion Control Notice of Intent (NOI) shall be filed with the department 14 days prior to any earth disturbing activities. In granting this approval the Division of Safety & Buildings reserves the right to require changes or additions should conditions arise making them necessary for code compliance. As per state stats 101.12(2), nothing in this review shall relieve the designer of the responsibility for designing a safe building, structure, or component. Inquiries concerning this correspondence may be made to me at the telephone number listed below, or at the address on this letterhead. Sincerely, Fee Required $ 100.00 Fee Received $ 100.00 A f Balance Due $ 0.00 Leroy G. TJsky' PSS, astew Specialist Integrated Services Bureau WiSMART code: 7633 (715)726-2544 Voice (715) 726-2549 Fax ansky@wisconsin.gov Leroyjansky@wisconsin.gov . , . I illlll 11111 11111 lllli 11111 11!11 llil 1!1!11 ill! IIII 891362 BETH PABST REGISTER OF DEEDS ST. CROIX CO., WI RECEIVED FOR RECORD 03/20/2009 12:00PM SPECIAL WARRANTY DEED EXEMPT REG FEE: 15.00 TRANS FEE: 750.00 PAGES: 3 Prepared by: Kerry Feld Continental REO Services, Inc. 7777 Bonhomme Avenue, Suite 1100 St. Louis, MO 63105 SPECIAL WARRANTY DEED This Deed is made and entered Into th)s day of., 20 _A&Vby and between Homesales, Inc. of the County of State of hereinafter collectively referred to as "Grantor" and TERRY W. MCKINLEY AND CAROL T. MCKINLEY of the County oA; 24 State of hereinafter referred to as "Grantee". The mailing address of the Grantee is WITNESSETH, that the Grantors, for and in consideration of the sum of Ten Dollars ($10.00) and other valuable considerations paid to the Grantor, the receipt of which is hereby acknowledged, does by these presents GRANT, BARGAIN AND SELL, CONVEY AND CONFIRM unto the Grantee, the following described lots, tracts or parcels of land lying, being and situated in the County of St. Croix and State of Wisconsin to-wit: PID'S 018100020200 018100020300 018100020350 018100020250 018100020105 Lot 1, of Certified Survey Map in Volume 16, Page 4328 filed as Document No. 68298$, located in part of Government Lot 2, Part of Government Lot 3 and Part of the SW 1/4 of the NE 1/4, all in Section 1, Township 29 North, Range 17 West, Town of Hammond, St. Croix County, Wisconsin, including part of Lot 1 of a Certified Survey Map recorded in Volume 2, Page 445, as Document No. 342493 at the St. Croix County Register of Deeds office. 1 of 3 RECEIVED JAN„82V VO.L K~AT 2lmPH GE 5311 1 'TISTfiR OF DfifiDS a r.cRwcouNwCERTIFIED SURVEY MAP NO. AF;-~TV°D- c0., xI SLMEYOR'S RECORD VOLUME PAGE ? 2 I 1 / 17 / 2006 R09EC000AM N LOT 1 C-S-M_ VOL. 16, PAGE 4328, BEING PART OF GO Nff 1RTIFIED i SURVEY Q3%r MAP AND 3 AND PART OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF THE MfffM-Hi~AST, SECTION 1, TOWNSHIP 29 NORTH, RANGE 17 WEST, TOWN OF HAMMOND, mow& ST. CROIX COUNTY, WISCONSIN Z X. Z 3 3 0 3 > e = (wajs (S ajeuipjoo) A junoD xloi) 4S) 3 K Wig^~ : ~ i.•j~ d: ~ ~ ° - ~ - a S , M..hS.LL.005 se Da,inseaw YI.-yy s m ° e , LL-6Z-L )aS •awi ia j~en0 V jnoS tom.-S'" i 7 ^ z O ~s ^ 3 v I Z; 44JON a'44 Oj Pa~uaJaja., s' 44JON dIN a N ~ } o c ~t 2 i 1 ~I z LLJ' 4 v - - _ I I 2 w Z s~o0, 09• ` ail - a 1 rn I ~ ° 0 dn~ I I C - N co ° o ;9 ,In aS' S00'15'29nE 559.43' M' !NO0115'09"W S59 4-61 ~ f>~~ P - = XtSYtN 3- o f 1 o - / S t_ ,LS ttiS_____ 3,ti6Z,Sl.O c 1 > o I' _ z ~ d•` H:,~ .°o perp.. ~ a a 1 1 O'er P a !nJ 1 .u ~ ~I ` F h1 0 T r .O t of ° v tnbo Zl tib5 M bb,SL'00 Nr3R'- 1 ■ ZI ^ :v _ i O~ '0 3: c 6% .4 `c ~t c9' ,O acv _ ' qi - o v o v c 1 l a l I< 0 .~~w,F-- ~ a°c 4 c w f~~ v ~ l .rn ` aCi OI I ' lVl..bh, 1-7 'ol I 1 E o S. c%j N N N ( N___________ i •`,6S-646 ` 9Z_9l9 3, titpSl.O I `I L Ln 09' - 1 1 (OS 99ZS M„Li LI.OOs) M~ z W y OL •99ZgJ- 1.00S c Of d•i 3w4 ~ V r_ ~ OI UI ' ~I C O I O C) cu cu o ~ v ~ n. a C ; d N cu D C _O C C - w` N V 1. t C L v rp L cN- .u~ n O C N L•-J C O C C N I.i1 a.l O O N rp .n ? p¢ y} j W O N to t_7 Cr 1--- IT - O ~-'~Q .OyQ? OQ Z TC m - ~ v C N (b ru IDD OpO C OY 2 Win we 1 a Q N `D o -Q 'D 7 tl_ ~J In t./) W O N CD 1:1 W c. O O c v c Z " L C.r_t i1.. -D o v p a~ s~ ~ tY C co ~ e 10 ::F. ~c° w ° • - p Sheet 1 of 2 Sheets 1 Of 2 Vol 22 Page 5311 SAFETY AND BUILDINGS DIVISION commerce.wi.gov Integrated 13 East Spruce Street ■ Chippewa Falls, WI 54729 ~SGO'nSI'n INSPECTION REPORT www.commerce.wi.gov/sb 15 726-2544 of Commerce RECEIVE Date of Inspection: August 16, 2006 Plumber Name and Address: Project Name: Unknown AUG 2 5 2006 Use: Residential Legal Description: SW, NE, 1, 29,17W ST. CROIX COUNTY Site Number: Subdivision: CSM Replat Pine Lake Shores Certified Soil Tester Name and Address: Municipality: Town of Hammond Thomas C. Nelson, CST 227387 County: St. Croix 1432 120th St New Richmond, WI 54017 Plan Transaction Number: 1309689 Sanitary Permit Number: NA Owner Name and Address: D & A Properties Wastewater Flow: 600 gpd 2633 Innsbruck Dr Persons Present: K. Grabau, T. Nelson New Brighton, MN 55112 An onsite soils verification was conducted at the above referenced site as per district policy for all sites with less than four inches of unsaturated soil below the bottom of the A horizon. The intent of this investigation is to confirm initial observations by the certified soil tester (CST) relating to the presence or absence of redoximorphic features in the A horizon and/or subsoil. In-situ soil texture, structure, and consistence factors were also reviewed as they relate to wastewater application rates. Other site conditions such as percent and direction of slope, landscape position, land surface contour length, and surface water hydrology may also be noted and their effects are factors considered in the recommendations and conclusions portion of this report. Select soil boring verifications were described as follows: T-1 (CST B-1 on Lot 1) 00-07" 10YR 3/2 sil, 2fgr, mfr, aw. 07-10" 10YR 3/2 sil, fgr, mfr, cw, w/ f1f 10YR 4/6 rmfs. 10-15" 10YR 4/4 sl, 1 msbk, mfr, cw, w/ c3d 10YR 5/6 and 6/2 rmfs. 15-19" 10YR 4/4 sl, 1 msbk, mfr, w/ m2d 10YR 5/6 and 6/2 rmfs. T-2 (CST B-2 on Lot 2) 00-10" 10YR 3/2 sil, 1csbk, mfr, as. 10-19" 7.5YR 4/4 scl, 2msbk, mfr, cw, w/ c2f 7.5YR 4/6 rmfs. 19-24" 5YR 4/4 sl, 2msbk, mfr, w/ c2d 7.5YR 5/8 rmfs. T-3 (CST B-2 on Lot 3) All borings reviewed had A+4 conditions. If a mound system is designed to overcome limitations of a high level of seasonal soil saturation and slow permeability, the linear loading rate should not exceed 4.5 gpd/ft and the basal wastewater application rated should not exceed 0.2 gpd/ftz. The additional basal area will partially compensate for the gentle land slope and prevent wastewater leakage at the mound toe. At least 30 inches of sand lift is recommended when applying septic tank effluent to the distribution cell of the mound to ensure proper treatment. The longest portion of the mound must be orientated along the contour. The mound shall be constructed to divert surface water around the mound structure as much as possible. In addition, an up slope drainage ditch should be considered if it is determined that surface or subsurface hydrology is improved by intercepting water and diverting it away from the mound site. If there are any questions regarding this report, please contact me. Leroy G. Ja ky, W tewater ecialist cc: [K County ❑ Plumber Ljansky@commerce.state.wi.u E-mail Q CST ❑ Owner r ' * Wisconsin Department of Commerce SOIL EVALUATION REPORT Page 1 of 3 Division of Safety and Buildings in accordance with Comm 85.2s. Adm. Code County St. Croix Attach complete site plan on paper not less than 81/2 x 11 inches in I lalJFParcel include, but not limited to: vertical and horizontal reference point (BM), di ion I.D. ~l percent slope, scale or dimensions, north arrow, and location and di nearest road. O j}- Please print all " Reviewed Date I It i. Personal information you provide may be used for Gonda cy-Law s. 15. 4 (1) (m)). (0 Property Owner Pro rty Location D and D Properties ,UL . 3 1 2~0~ Govt Lot NW 1/4 NE 1/4 S 1 T 29 N R 17 EE((or))WW Property Owner's Mailing Address Lot Block # Subd. Name or CSM# 2633 Innsbruck Dr S' OR~Dt3~T 1 The Shores Of Pine Lake City State Zip Code WR@ WIN- ity []Mllage own Nearest Road New Brighton MN 55112 ( 6 1-635-9157 117th Avenue & 205th St 1 Hamm=,, E] New Construction UseEj Residential / Number of bedrooms 3 to 4 Code derived design flow rate 450 to 600 GPD 0 Replacement 13 Public or commercial - Describe: Parent material Loess over glacial Till Flood Plain elevation if applicable *.r A ft. General comments Site suitable for an A+0 design only and recommendations: ,I c~'l ~rv`~ ZO 47 F7]Bodng # 0 Boring Q Pit Ground surface elev. 1189.68 ft. Depth to limiting factor 8 in. Sal Application Rate Horizon Depth Dominant Color Redox Description Texture Structure Consistence Boundary Roots GPD/ff in. Munsell Qu. Sz. Cont. Color Gr. Sz. Sh. *Eff#1 *Eff#2 1 0-8 10yr3/2 sil 2msbk dsh as 2f .6 .8 2 8-10 1 3/2 12f7.5yr5/8 sil lmsbk dsh cs if .4 .6 3 10-13 10yr4/4 :20,5yr5/8 Sid lmsbk dsh CS if .2 .3 4 13-23 7.5yr4/6 -2PyrrS/8 fsl Om dh - - .2 .5 27 Boring # © Boring 1192.36 15 v Q Pit Ground surface elev. ft. Dept to limiting factor in. Sal Application Rate Horizon Depth Dominant Color Redox Description Texture Structure Consistence Boundary Roots GPD/fF in. Munsell Qu. Sz. Cont. Color Gr. Sz. Sh. *Eff#1 *Eff#2 1 0-11 10yr3/2 - sil 2msbk dsh as 2f .6 .8 2 11-15 1 4/4 sil 2msbk dsh cs if .6 .8 3 15-18 10yr4/4 f2t7.5yr5/8 sil lmsbk dsh cs 1 f .4 .8 4 18-26 7.5yr4/6 - sl lmsbk dsh - - .4 .7 * Effluent #1 = BOD > 30:E 220 mg/L and TSS >30:5 150 mg/L * Effluent #2 = BOD < 30 mg/L and TSS < 30 mg/L CST Name (Please Print) Signature CST Number Thomas C Nelson 227387 Address Date Evaluation Conducted Telephone Number 1432 120th Street, New Richmond, WI 11/01/05 715-246-2454 y properly Owner D and D Properties Parcel ID # Pending Page 2 of 3 3 Boring # Boring E] Pit Ground surface elev. 1188'72 ft. Depth to limiting factor 7 in. Sal Application Rate Horizon Depth Dominant Color Redox Description Texture Structure Consistence Boundary Roots GPD/fP in. Munsell Qu. Sz. Cont. Color Gr. Sz. Sh. *Eff#1 *Eff#2 1 0-7 10yr3/2 - sil 2msbk dsh as 2f .6 .8 2 7-10 1 3/2 M7.5 5/8 sil 2msbk dsh cs 2f .6 .8 3 10-16 10yr5/3 c2d~ 7.5yr5%8 sil lmsbk dsh cs if .4 .6 4 16-30 7.5yr4/6 m2p5yr5/8 sl 0m dh - - .2 .6 Boring # Boring F-1 Pit Ground surface elev. ft. Depth to limiting factor in. Soil Application Rate Horizon Depth Dominant Color Redox Description Texture Structure Consistence Boundary Roots GPDffP in. Munsell Qu. Sz. Cont. Color Gr. Sz. Sh. *Eff#1 *Eff#2 F] Boring # 9 Boring Pit Ground surface elev. ft. Depth to limiting factor in. Soil Application Rate Horizon Depth Dominant Color Redox Description Texture Structure Consistence Boundary Roots GPD/fE in. Munsell Qu. Sz. Cont. Color Gr. Sz. Sh. *Eff#1 *Eff#2 * Effluent #1 = BODE > 30:E 220 mg/L and TSS >30:E 150 mg/L * Effluent #2 = BODE < 30 mg/L and TSS a 30 mgll The Department of Commerce is an equal opportunity service provider and employer. If you need assistance to access services or need material in an alternate format, please contact the department at 608-266-3151 or TTY 608-264-8777. SB13-8330Tes[ (R.07M) D&A Properties Lot 1 1 BM2 30' 2 3 0 110' N1 7% slope 1S0' 81 160' BM1 180, '190' 180' 118' 110' Scale 1" = 3 BM1 1189.68 BM2 1188.72 B1 1189.68' B2 1192.36' B3 1188.74' SW lot corner Thomas Nelson 2273871r r 1349689 4 Introduction: L' T ~ On April 24, 2006, Thomas Nelson, CSTM, Environmental By Design conducted a soil and site evaluation on property owned by Don & Dave Ault., located in theSiWI/4, NEIA, Section 1, T29N-17W, town of Hammond, platted as t,11 of 9 and A Properties Inc subdivision, this purpose being to determine the highest level of seasonal soil saturation so that a POWTS might be installed. This investigation revealed that the soils were only good for an A+0 mound system through an interpretive determination as designated by the Wisconsin Department Of Commerce's Administrative Code, Comm 85. Methodology: Backhoe pits were provided for three borings, l through 3, with interpretations of the sites suitability being conducted by using soil redoximorphic features, soil texture, soil structure, soil color pursuant to the guidelines under Chapter Comm 85 of the Wisconsin Administrative Code and using the USDA-MRCS soil descriptive system. During this field investigation the landscapes morphological features, vegetation, and hydrology was determined for the purpose of this Interpretive Determination as defined in Comm 85.60(2) of the Wisconsin Administrative Code. Upon completion of the collected field data, which included the accurate measurement of the sites featured parameters, site plans, system design, and this interpretive report have been developed for review. The intent is to demonstrate that a minimum of 6 inches of unsaturated soil exists on this site and any influencing factors on this would allow the compliant installation of a mound system serving a residential use for this property as allowed under Comm 83.44(3xb) of the Wisconsin Administrative Code. Local Hydrology: The local hydrology of this site is influenced by the average of 30 inches of precipitation received. The soil. properties and localized topography both influence water movement on this property. Seasonal issues such as frozen ground and warm temperatures also have their influences during the winter months when the ground is frozen, there would be an accumulation of snow with any melting action running off the site on the surface of the ground. Spring rains would produce additional surface runoff until the ground has thawed. Upon thawing, the influence on groundwater levels would be minimal due to the location of the site with its limited upslope watershed. The 7 percent surface slope would also aid the slower permeability of the soils. Summer temperatures and plant growth would provide removal of soil moisture through evaporation and evapotranspiration. Local Geomorphology, Soil Disturbance, and Local Topography The geologic interpretation of this area directly related to the glacial geology of the Eastern St. Croix Moraine, a ground moraine that was formed by the accumulation beneath the glacier and resulted in a composition of stony, reddish-brown glacial drift. Post-glacial windblown silts formed loess deposits that overlays this till. Below is the Cambrian bedrock Prairie Du Chien formation, a dolitimized limestone formation. Soil forming activities have resulted in what is known as the Northern Till Uplands soils resulting in dark silty soils. The site was probably originally in crop production in previous years. However, at the time of this determination it was grass. This hillside has a 7 percent slopes and was probably formed as the advancing ice scoured the landscape, retreated, depositing the till material, forming the rounded knobs of the hillside. Soil Series and Mapping Units The St. Croix County Soil Survey has mapped this area as being of Freeon soil series, which consists of gently sloping, moderately well drained soils. These soils are on low ridges and foot slopes of ground moraines. They formed in silty sediment and the underlying reddish sandy loam till. The FoB soils of this series are representative as described by the Soil Survey and are represented by a surface layer that is approximately 8 inches of dark grayish brown silt loam. The subsurface layer is brown silt loam and about 10 inches thick. The subsoil is about 16 inches thick. The upper part is dark brown, mottled, friable silt loam; the middle part is a reddish brown, mottled, friable to firm loam; and the lower part is reddish brown, mottled, firm loam. The substratum, to a depth of 60 inches, is yellowish red, mottled, firm sandy loam. Data ➢ The soils evaluation report and system design have been included with this report. ➢ A copy of the USDA Soil Survey map that provides the soil-mapping unit described above. ➢ A USGS Topographic Map, revealing the topography of the site. ➢ POWT site plan, representing the best location and layout of the system that best treats and distributes the systems discharge water. Government Reports Leroy Jansky, Wisconsin Department of Commerce Wastewater Specialist, will visit this property. Additional Information Unique to the site During the evaluation there was the observation of biological activity in the form of worm burrows and roots. Worm activity was recognized at a depth of 10 inches in boring l & 2 and at a depth of I 1 inches in boring thee. Root activity was observed at 14 inches on boring 1, 13 itches on boring 2, 17 inches in boring 3. It is recognized that these biological activities are normally not apparent in zones that are saturated for long periods of time. These factors further support the suggestion that this portion of the profile dries quickly after a precipitation event. This site is unique in that there is an existing mound system just upslope from this tested area. This mound serves the adjoining property to the north. Having visited this site numerous times, each observation showed this mound to be working properly with no evidence of any surface seepage. Recommendations The recommendation for the site would be for the site to be chisel plowed to a depth of at least 15 inches so as to breakup the soil interface, thus aiding infiltration. From the upside slope of the system area, 30 inches of ASTM C-33 sand lift will be placed on the plowed area This provides the 36 inches of vertical separation to provide the treatment of pathogenic organisms. The recommended mound design uses a linear loading rate of 4.5 gpd/ft and an in-situ soil application rate of 0.2gpd/t2. This will be accomplished by designing the absorption area to be long and narrow and extended the down slope toe area to a 4:1 dimension, effectively increasing the basal area and eliminating the chances of toe seepage. Additionally, the slope on the upper toe edge of the mound will be constructed so as to be a slope with a 3:1 side slope at each end and a 6:1 side slope for the I dimension (upper slope) at a point IJ2 (this being the location at half the distance of the total length of the mound) so as to help divert surface water from the upper slope (See included suggested mound detail plan). Finally the design requires that a water diversion ditch be installed above the mound so as to divert surface waters from the upslope area This should be installed with a 5:1 slope, a width of eleven feet, and oriented so that it traverses the contour slightly, draining the run off water north and down slope of the mound area. Conclusions It is my belief that the soils in the area of the proposed POWS will not be saturated above 6" for seven or more consecutive days for the following reasons: The described soils in this location supports the mapped description, which represents in its description more sandy clay loams and silty clay in the substratum. ➢ The biological activity in the soil as represented by the roots and Earth Worm presence, suggest that the soil has not been saturated in the most recent history of the soils. These activities cannot survive in saturated conditions. ➢ A design with a long and narrow system representing a linear loading rate of 4.5 gallons per day per foot and an in-site soil application rate of .0.2gpd/A. This configuration represents the best distribution of the wastewater, spreading it over a longer area. With the increased height of the mound, there is the assurance that there will be 3 feet of filtration between the bottom of the system and the zone of saturation. Also built into the plan is the increased dimension of the upslope of the mound, providing a 6:1 slope at the L/2 location, and the addition of a drainage ditch above the mound. These last two additional features will minimize surface runoff onto the mound area from higher elevations behind the system. The total design assures that the requirements of Comm. 83.41 of the Wisconsin Administrative Code are being met so as to properly filter the wastewater and to assure that there is no surface discharge, with discharge going below grade. ➢ The mound septic design and management plan provides proper treatment of wastewater and expected system longevity. Accordingly, the plan submittal addresses the methods and design for treatment and dispersal of the wastewater below the surface as addressed by the code requirements. ➢ In each pit that was dug the prominence and size of RMFS increases with depth suggesting that the lower horizons are more saturated for a longer period of time, The second horizon in each pit while being saturated for a given period, are not as saturated as the horizons below. Pit number 2 suggests that it is not saturated for as long a period of time as 1 and 3 and is apparent by the contrast of the RMFS. This being the uppermost pit, it suggests that saturation becomes more significant as you are lower on the slope. With this understanding the system should be located as high on the site as possible. The matric colors of the soil changes from l Oyr3/2 to I Oyr5/3 as you go lower in the soil profile suggesting more saturated conditions lower in the profile. ➢ As there is an existing mound on the site the planned location maintains a separation distance of 4o feet. It had been recommended by Leroy Janski during discussion to maintain at least a distance of 30 feet. Observations have revealed that this mound system is functioning as originally designed and supports the idea that the soils adjacent to the new site are able to handle the increased nutrient and liquid load. The final authority for this site's approval rests with the appropriate regulatory agencies: the Wisconsin Department of Commerce and the St. Croix County Zoning officials. Thomas C Nelsen p. 0 t CST 227387 Conditlo f` - May 23 2006 f 7 ye ip a Ri- DEPARTMENT OF DIVI ON OF SAFETY AND BUILDINGS SEE G RESPO ENLE Lz T- 13 0 9 6 9 Wisconsin Department of Commerce SOIL EVALUATION REPORT Pop 1 of 3 Division of Safety and Buildings in accordance with Comm 85, Wis. Adm. Code AMY St. Croix Attach complete site plan on paper not less than 81/2 x 11 inches in size. Plan must include, but not limited to: vertical and horizontal reference point (BM), direction and Pares[ l.D percent slope, scale or dimensions, north arrow, and location and distance to nearest road. Pending Please psiftt all iti of maiion. Reviewed by Date Personal information you provide may be used for secondary purposes (Privacy Law, s. 15.04 (1) (m))_ Property Owner Property Location D and j5►Properties Govt. Lot SW 1/4 NE 1/4 9 I T 29 N R 17 EE ( Property Owner's Mailing Address Lot # Block # Subd. Name or CSM# 2633 Innsbruck Dr 1 The Shores Of Pine Lake State Zip Code Phone Number ity Village ■ own Nearest Road KY New Brighton MN 55112 ( 6)51-635-9157 117th Avenue & 205th St 01New Construction Use[D Residential / Number of bedrooms 3 to 4 Code derived design flow rate 450 to 600 GPD Replacement 11 Public or commercial - Describe: Parent material Loess over glacial Till Flood Plain elevation if applicable 44 ft. General comments Site suitable for an A+0 design only and recommendations: F71 Boring # ® Bonng Pit Ground surface elev. 1189.68 ft. Depth to limiting factor $ in. Q Sell - Rafe Applicabon Horizon Depth Dominant Color Redox Description Texture Structure Consistence Boundary Roots GPD/fl? in. Mansell Qu. Sz. Cont. Color Gr. Sz. Sh. 'Eff!!1 *EM2 1 0-8 10yr3/2 - sil 2msbk dsh as 2f .6 .8 2 8-10 1 3/2 f2f7.5yr5/8 sil lmsbk dsh cs if .4 .6 3 10-13 10yr4/4 e2d7.5yr5/8 siel lmsbk dsh es if .2 .3 4 13-23 7.5yr4/6 m2pyrr5/8 fsl om dh - - .2 .5 F Boring # Boring 1192.36 15 2 El Pit Ground surface elev. ft. Depth to limiting feeler in. Soil 'cation-Rate- - - Horizon Deptit Dominant Color Redox Desalption Texture Structure Consistence Boundary Roots GPDM in. Munsell Qu. Sz. Cant. Color Gr. Sz. Sh. *Eft#1 *Eff#2 1 0-11 10yr3/2 - sil 2msbk dsh as 2f .6 .8 2 11-15 1 /4 - sil 2msbk dsh cs if .6 .8 3 15-18 10yr4/4 W7.5yr5/8 sil lmsbk dsh cs if .4 .8 4 18-26 7.5yr4/6 - sl l msbk dsh - - .4 .7 ' Effluent #1 = BOD > 30 < 220 mg/- and TSS >30:5 150 mg/L ' Effluent #2 = BOD < 30 mg/L and TSS < 30 mg/L CST Name (Please Print) Signature CST Number Thomas C Nelson 227387 Address Date Evaluation Conducted Telephone Number 1432120th Street, New Richmond, WI 11101105 715-246-2454 Property Owner D and D Properties Parcel ID # Pending Page 2 Of 3 3 00" # ®Boring I Pit Ground surface elev. 1188.72 Depth to limiting factor 7 ft. in. Soil Anication Rate Horizon Depth Dominant Color Redox Description Texture Structure Consistence Boundary Roots GPDM in. Munsell Qu. Sz. Cont. Color Gr. Sz. Sh. *Eff#1 " Eft#2 1 0-7 10yr3/2 - sil 2msbk dsh as 2f .6 .8 2 7-10 1 Ovr3/2 t2f15S/8 sit 2msbk dsh cs 2f .6 .8 3 10-16 10yr5/3 c2d7,5yr5/8 sil lmsbk dsh cs if .4 6 4 16-30 7.5yr4/6 m2p5yr5/8 sl 0m dh - - .2 .6 F-1 Boring # P Boring Pit Ground surface elev. ft. Depth to limiting factor in. Soft Application Rae Horizon Depth Dominant Color Redox Description Texture Structure Consistence Boundary Roots GPD/fF in. Munsell Qu_ Sz_ Cont_ Color Gr. Sz Sh_ *Eff91 *Eff#2 F-1 Boring Boring Pit Ground surface elev. ft. Depth to limiting factor in. Sod Application Horizon Depth Dominant Color Redox Damon Texture Structure Consistence Boundary Boots GPD/fP in. Munsell Qu. Sz. Cant. Color Gr. Sz. Sh. `C-fW1 `E092 * Effluent #1 = SOD, > 30 220 mg/L and TSS >30:5 150 mg/L * Effluent #2 = BOD, :5 30 mg/L and TSS < 30 mg/L The Department of Commerce is an equal opportunity service provider and employer. If you need assistance to access services or need material in an alternate format, please contact the department at 608-266-3151 or TTY 608-264-$777. saer~ cx.~rree> D&A Properties Lot 1 4 BM2 -3W 2 3 N04 7% slope 450' B4 16W BM7 160' 499' lw lie, 110' Scale 1"= 30 BM1 1189.68' BM2 1188.72 B1 1189.68' B2 1192.36' B3 1188.74' rW lot corner Thomas Nelson 227387'' D&A Properties Lot 1 wa Mound Area approbrnatly 37 by 136' a 7% slop - 1188' B' 119 X40'+ - 11 Q2' Existing mound system servicing adjacent properly 11' wide diversion ditch with 5:1 side slopes Purpose of diverting water from the back side of the mound. This ditch traverses SCAB 1" so the contour line and drains NE of the mound 111M1 1189.$8 1168,73 81 1188.88' 821182.36' 831108,74' - - 1o! 8Or"Sir A A' s B' ThOMN NOW 2273187 1 foot depth 1' ditch bottom i 2 vaC2.. ~emc2 5A-20 w LCT1 ~ y- f 1 - S A \\y ' FF`` f ~ „r Vcte2vtfsis ~~OV€RNMENTi C 6A328 TM nkM11 i^:G t GO4ERNMENT LOT3 f~ 3 Fos 19835 ! ~GSMVQ ~P~S ~ I f a A.02 31 ITM A* 14 Orel -~4 -4 8,c kt z (.I ~l' rA fs