Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
018-1000-20-300
Parcel 018-1000-20-300 02115/2008 02:56 PAGE 1 OF 1 F 1 Alt. Parcel 01.29.17.2A-200 018 - TOWN OF HAMMOND Current X ST. CROIX COUNTY, WISCONSIN Creation Date Historical Date Map # Sales Area Application # Permit # Permit Type 11/17/2006 00 0 Tax Address: Owner(s): O = Current Owner, C = Current Co-Owner O - AULT, KAREN S KAREN S AULT 1965 15TH AVE NW ST PAUL MN 55112 Districts: SC = School SP = Special Property Address(es): * = Primary Type Dist # Description * 2056 117TH AVE SC 0231 BALDWIN-WOODVILLE AREA SP 1700 WITC I Legal Description: Acres: 3.090 Plat: 5311-CSM 22-5311 018-06 SEC 01 T29N R17W PT SW/NE & GOV LOTS 2 & Block/Condo Bldg: LOT 03 3 & INC CSM VOL 2/445 FKA CSM 16/4328 LOT 1 24.342AC BEING CSM 22-5311 LOT 3 Tract(s): (Sec-Twn-Rng 40 1/4 160 1/4) (3.09 AC) 01-29N-17W NW NE Notes: Parcel History: ate Doc # Vol/Page Type I 1/22/2006 839345 WD 11/17/2006 38992 1 CSM 04/23/2004 760451 2522/53155/259 WD I 04/23/2004 760450 2555/258 (~C mor 2008 SUMMARY Bill air Market Value: Assessed with: 0 Valuations: Last Changed: 07/19/2007 Description Class Acres Land Improve Total State Reason RESIDENTIAL G1 3.090 29,300 0 29,300 NO Totals for 2008: General Property 3.090 29,300 0 29,300 Woodland 0.000 0 0 Totals for 2007: General Property 3.090 29,300 0 29,300 Woodland 0.000 0 0 Lottery Credit: Claim Count: 0 Certification Date: Batch Specials: User Special Code Category Amount Special Assessments Special Charges Delinquent Charges Total 0.00 0.00 0.00 r CD X' y r ~ 0 f C Cn (fl , 3 N ~ IIII ~ Z;r tr, w O p F j-. 3 `f r i( I c - II j ° ',i II ~l # o II - N N W Z it € a CD z 1 c i rn tri ai j L L Safety and Buildings 0541 N RANCH commerce.Wi.gov RECEIVED 1HAYWARD WI 508 3 TDD (608) 264-8777 AUG 3 1 2006 sco n s' n www.commerce.wi.gov/sb/ www.wisco isconsinsin.go .gov Department of Commerce ST. CROIX COUNTY Jim Doyle, Governor Mary P. Burke, Secretary August 22, 2006 CUST ID No. 227387 ATTN: POWTS Inspector THOMAS C NELSON ZONING OFFICE ENVIRONMENTAL BY DESIGN ST CROIX COUNTY SPIA 1432 120TH ST 1101 CARMICHAEL RD NEW RICHMOND WI 54017 HUDSON WI 54016 CONDITIONAL APPROVAL PLAN APPROVAL EXPIRES: 08/22/2008 Identification Numbers Transaction ID No. 1309689 SITE: D & A fors 1-3 A"Asfp CSK Site ID No. 716819 Properties Inc Town of Hammond, St Croix County Please refer to both identification numbers, v Z~ I SW 1/4, NE 1/4, S1, T29N, R17W above, in,all correspondence with the a enc . FOR: Object Type: Soil Saturation Determination Regulated Object ID No.: 1091568 The submittal described above has been reviewed for conformance with applicable Wisconsin Administrative Codes and Wisconsin Statutes. The submittal has been CONDITIONALLY APPROVED. The owner, as defined in chapter 101.01(10), Wisconsin Statutes, is responsible for compliance with all code requirements. The following conditions shall be met during construction or installation and prior to occupancy or use: 1. Approval is hereby granted pursuant to s. Comm 85.60(2), Wis. Adm. Code, to estimate the depth to seasonal soil saturation based on an interpretive determination process. Approval of the interpretive determination negates the requirement in s. Comm 85.30(2)(b), Wis. Adm. Code to designate the ground surface as the highest level of soil saturation when redoximorphic features are less than 4 inches below the bottom of the A horizon. 2. The estimated highest level of prolonged soil saturation approved under this determination is 6 inches below grade. At least 30 inches of sand lift on top of 6 inches of unsaturated, in-situ soil is required for adequate treatment and dispersal. 3. The basal soil application rate for the mound shall be 0.20 gpd/sf, and the linear loading rate 4.5 gpd/ft. 4. Chisel plowing to a depth of 15 inches immediately prior to sand placement is required to improve vertical water movement into the soil solum. 5. Landscaping up slope of the mound shall be incorporated into the POWTS design to prevent surface water from concentrating along the up slope edge of the mound and to divert surface water drainage away from the system. 6. This approval shall remain valid unless the site is altered in such a way that the depth to soil saturation would change or if saturated conditions are observed for seven consecutive days at depths less than 3 feet below the infiltrative surface of the POWTS distribution component. 7. This approval in no way relinquishes the use of color patterns to estimate the depth to high groundwater on any other parcels or portions of parcels. 8. A copy of this approval letter and attachments must accompany the mound system design for this site for purposes of plan approval and sanitary permit issuance. If the Interpretive Determination Report was accompanied with a plan and an expiration date is shown on this letter, the expiration date only applies to the plans for the design, not to the decision on the Interpretive Determination Report. I r THOMAS C NELSON Page 2 8/22/2006 A copy of the approved plans, specifications and this letter shall be on-site during construction and open to inspection by authorized representatives of the Department, which may include local inspectors. If plan index sheets were submitted in lieu of additional full plansets, a copy of this approval letter and index sheet shall be attached to plans that correspond with the copy on file with the Department. All permits required by the state or the local municipality shall be obtained prior to commencement of construction/installation/operati)n. If this construction project will disturb one or more acres of land, an Erosion Control Notice of Intent (NOI) shall be filed with the department 14 days prior to any earth disturbing activities. In granting this approval the Division of Safety & Buildings reserves the right to require changes or additions should conditions arise making them necessary for code compliance. As per state stats 101.12(2), nothing in this review shall relieve the designer of the responsibility for designing a safe building, structure, or component. Inquiries concerning this correspondence may be made to me at the telephone number listed below, or at the address on this letterhead. Sincerely, Fee Required $ 100.00 Fee Received $ 100.00 Balance Due $ 0.00 Leroy G. !Jsky' PSS, astew Specialist Y Integrated Services Bureau WiSMART code: 7633 (715)726-2544 Voice (715) 726-2549 Fax Leroy.j ansky@wisconsin.gov SAFETY AND BUILDINGS DIVISION commerce.wi.gov Integrated Services Bureau 13 East Spruce Street ■ Chippewa Falls, WI 54729 wi.gov/sb ISCO1'1511'1 INSPECTION REPORT www.comme15 . 7 - 5 of Commerce RFr.FivFn Date of Inspection: August 16, 2006 Plumber Name and Address: Project Name: Unknown AUG 2 5 2006 Use: Residential ST. CROIX COUNTY Legal Description: SW, NE, 1, 29,17W Site Number: Subdivision: CSM Replat Pine Lake Shores Certified Soil Tester Name and Address: Municipality: Town of Hammond Thomas C. Nelson, CST 227387 County: St. Croix 1432 120th St New Richmond, WI 54017 Plan Transaction Number: 1309689 Sanitary Permit Number: NA Owner Name and Address: D & A Properties Wastewater Flow: 600 gpd 2633 Innsbruck Dr Persons Present: K. Grabau, T. Nelson New Brighton, MN 55112 An onsite soils verification was conducted at the above referenced site as per district policy for all sites with less than four inches of unsaturated soil below the bottom of the A horizon. The intent of this investigation is to confirm initial observations by the certified soil tester (CST) relating to the presence or absence of redoximorphic features in the A horizon and/or subsoil. In-situ soil texture, structure, and consistence factors were also reviewed as they relate to wastewater application rates. Other site conditions such as percent and direction of slope, landscape position, land surface contour length, and surface water hydrology may also be noted and their effects are factors considered in the recommendations and conclusions portion of this report. Select soil boring verifications were described as follows: T-1 (CST B-1 on Lot 1) 00-07" 10YR 312 sil, 2fgr, mfr, aw. 07-10" 10YR 3/2 sil, fgr, mfr, cw, w/ f1f 10YR 4/6 rmfs. 10-15" 10YR 4/4 sl, 1 msbk, mfr, cw, w/ c3d 10YR 5/6 and 6/2 rmfs. 15-19" 10YR 4/4 sl, 1 msbk, mfr, w/ m2d 10YR 5/6 and 6/2 rmfs. T-2 (CST B-2 on Lot 2) 00-10" 10YR 3/2 sil, 1csbk, mfr, as. 10-19" 7.5YR 4/4 scl, 2msbk, mfr, cw, w/ c2f 7.5YR 4/6 rmfs. 19-24" 5YR 4/4 sl, 2msbk, mfr, w/ c2d 7.5YR 5/8 rmfs. T-3 (CST B-2 on Lot 3) All borings reviewed had A+4 conditions. If a mound system is designed to overcome limitations of a high level of seasonal soil saturation and slow permeability, the linear loading rate should not exceed 4.5 gpd/ft and the basal wastewater application rated should not exceed 0.2 gpd/ft2. The additional basal area will partially compensate for the gentle land slope and prevent wastewater leakage at the mound toe. At least 30 inches of sand lift is recommended when applying septic tank effluent to the distribution cell of the mound to ensure proper treatment. The longest portion of the mound must be orientated along the contour. The mound shall be constructed to divert surface water around the mound structure as much as possible. In addition, an up slope drainage ditch should be considered if it is determined that surface or subsurface hydrology is improved by intercepting water and diverting it away from the mound site. If there are any questions regarding this report, please contact me. Leroy G. Ja ky, W tewater ecialist cc: ❑X County ❑ Plumber Ljansky@commerce.state.wi.u E-mail CST ❑ Owner RECEIVED 8 3 8 9 U p~ 92 JA1{ VOL 22 PAGE 5311 KATHLEEN H. WALSH REGISTER OF DEEDS or.cRot mpmCERTIFIED SURVEY MAP NO. °£.TR0.nx,OR-R'ECORD roR'SRECORD VOLUME 22 PAGE- 5311 11/17/2006 09e00AM 4CRTIFIED SURVEY MAP N LOT 1 C.S.M. VOL. 16, PAGE 4328, BEING PART OF GOVERNE*VF&Qj AND 3 AND PART OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF THE n HL2AST, SECTION 1, TOWNSHIP 29 NORTH, RANGE 17 WEST, TOWN OF HAMMOND, ST- CROIX COUNTY, WISCONSIN MONO 3>.a No - 10- i 4- (waJs(S aJeu,ploo] dJuno] x,o1] JS) O03 M~ ;.r z T _ a a a + ,T M..7S.LL.00S se paJnseaw I . pno 00 Z. r+ 2 1 ^ ° ^ s I LL-6Z-L )aS -aul] .la J.IenD y4noS YID^ ^ C>3, Z; tWON a4{ 04 pa~uaJa0J s' 4J.ION Q,.a.'-(n i o 0 3 ¢ ~l 0 ~n~ sY GI m "4 V - - ` 51----__--_ c a; w :Z ~..bg~o .9. V]I ~ I I v o O = I rl a~ I I p C _ N o 'a 1 tl a rZ tQ~ aDe~ o • SO z~l m_ O 0. 1.99 i °o SOO'15'29"E 559.43' / 11400'15'09"W 559.46') I M - ,L5 l~S 3,(6Z.S L.O S 2- M/ ,l .7~ •s e ¢ u'} M 3 3 vc,' o O; oil' .0 q to :cN -.6 E (D Mti'vSL.00.. cal, a ac~i w - .r E ; cvI .c ! sJ In g s~;N ' 1 =rv v w` z u o I 4 ~ c 0 S. f~ I Qf e r- a1 E, CC) > 76 PI) - - ;I 1 ~ c F.: vl°Oi ~ co ~ 7V~~M..tib SL`:605 co ('n o`° u of loi i+-J I 6fP1$9 C ~v yv Loll')h -ARL w t Q ' ye O c'j o z^- -i,,.1 Mt0 N c J-g^ ^ M r (N ! 9Z'9LS 3,titpSUO I 6S 6ti6 - _ cr, 'L 1. - - it 3f1N3AV 44SOZ - - -r C14 (,059925 M..t~.~1.00s) I ~I $ LW a ,01-'99Z9 m" 179'L LOOS..-t__,,,'. ( c L I 1 0.1 E-.1 .r 1' ro al ; VI I col JI _ inn L 3 C) I , -31 rv O I L cu o c; d N m V c o c o C ; G 0 Z E (o ai p v 'n ci I. Y c te a- .o L I~ c E c o o c O V CV w O , N v N (/1 C:> Gj :E y.- (n Q ¢ to Cl - •ll N 10 a, O C)~ a, (Ij C, L~ p Q S O M CV C i a !X C1 COQj O W C7 c O C1 N v~ oowc _ o c LJ- o oQl a, v x p ° U-~ T 'J - c (Y u i - .Q (n ~ u--. v0 ~ u_ cG (n w D L7 ~n L7 ck~ rJ co O L7 v. Q O1 O _ ~1 I ,v, c Sheet 1 of 2 Sheets I oft Vol 22 Page 5311 o ~ w Wisconsin Department ofCommek A I0IL EVALUATION REPORT Page I of 3 Division of Safety and Buildings -in-'an- udh Comm 85, Wis. Adm. Code Attach complete site plan on paper not less than 81 /2 x 11 inches in size. Plan must County St. Croix include, but not limited to: vertical and horizontal reference point (BM), direction and paw percent slope, scale or dimensions, north arrow, and location and distan rest road. rj 2v Please print all ED Rev' ed by Date Personal information you provide may be used for nda oses (Privacy Law, s. 15. (1) (m)). ZI) 1 g O Property Owner D and D Properties Prope Location JUG 3 1 2~ G vt. L NW 1/4 NE 4 S I T 29 N R 17 EE((or)❑W Property Owner's Mailing Address ST CRp~X C Lot # Block # Subd. Name or CSM# 2633 Innsbruck Dr The Shores Of Pine Lake City State Zip Code P r ity MIlage ■ Town Nearest Road New Brighton MN 55112 ( 6151-635-9157 Hammond 117th Avenue & 205th St Q New Construction Usee Residential / Number of bedrooms 3 to 4 Code derived design flow rate 450 to 600 GPD © Replacement ❑ Public or commercial - Describe: Parent material Loess over glacial Till Flood Plain elevation if applicable blA , General comments Site suitable for an A+0 design only and recommendations: Iu, r 1❑ Boring # 01 Bonng Q Pit Ground surface elev. 1174.50 ft. Depth to limiting factor 12 in. Soil Appli Rate Horizon Depth Dominant Color Redox Description Texture Structure Consistence Boundary Roots GPDlfF in. Munsell Qu. Sz. Cont. Color Gr. Sz. Sh. 'Eff#1Eff#2 1 0-9 10yr3/2 - sil 2msnk dsh as 2f .6 .8 2 9-12 1 4/4 - sil lmsbk dsh cs if .4 .6 3 12-20 10yr4/4 c2d7.5yr5/8 sil l msbk dsh - l f .4 .6 F 2 Boring # Boring 1174.60 10 Q Pit Ground surface elev. ft. Depth to limiting factor in. Sal Application Rate Horizon Depth Dominant Color Redox Description Texture Structure Consistence Boundary Roots GPD/fF in. Munsell Qu. Sz. Cont. Color Gr. Sz. Sh. 'Eff#1 "Eff#2 1 0-8 10yr3/2 sil 2msbk dsh as 2f .6 .8 2 8-10 1 4/4 - sil lmsbk dsh cs if .4 .6 3 10-13 10yr4/4 f2d7.5yr5/8 sil lmsbk dsh cs I f .4 .6 4 13-27 7.5yr4/6 sl lmsbk dsh - - .4 .7 * Effluent #1 = BOD > 30:s 220 mg/L and TSS >30 < 150 mg/L ' Effluent #2 = BOD < 30 mglL and TSS < 30 mglL CST Name (Please Print) Signature CST Number Thomas C Nelson 227387 Address Date Evaluation Conducted Telephone Number 1432 120th Street, New Richmond, WI 11101105 715-246-2454 Property Owner D and D Properties Parcel ID # Pending Page 2 of 3 a Boring Boring # E] Pit Ground surface elev. 1177.03 ft Depth to limiting factor 11 in. Soil Application Rate Horizon Depth Dominant Color Redox Description Texture Structure Consistence Boundary Roots GPD/fP in. Munsell Qu. Sz. Cont. Color Gr. Sz. Sh. *Eff#1 *Eff#2 1 0-7 10yr3/2 - sil 2msbk dsh as 2f .6 .8 1 2 7-11 1 Ovr4/4 sil Imsbk dsh cs if .4 .6 3 11-14 10yr4/4 f2d7.5yr5/8 sil lmsbk dsh cs if .4 •6 1 4 14-17 7.5yr4/6 - sl lmsbk dsh - - .4 .7 ❑ Boring # P Boring Pit Ground surface elev. ft. Depth to limiting factor in. Sal lication Rate Horizon Depth Dominant Color Redox Description Texture Structure Consistence Boundary Roots GPD/fF in. Munsell Qu. Sz. Cont. Color Gr. Sz. Sh. *Eff#1 *Eff#2 Boring F-1 Boring # Ground surface elev. ft. Depth to limiting factor in. Pit Soil lication Rate Horizon Depth Dominant Color Redox Description Texture Structure Consistence Boundary Roots GPD/ff in. Munsell Qu. Sz. Cont. Color Gr. Sz. Sh. *Eff#1 *Eff#2 * Effluent #1 = BOD5 > 30:5 220 mg1L and TSS >30 < 150 mg/t_ * Effluent #2 = BODS < 30 mg1L and TSS < 30 mg/L The Department of Commerce is an equal opportunity service provider and employer. If you need assistance to access services or need material in an alternate format, please contact the department at 608-266-3151 or TTY 608-264-8777. SOD-8330Tes[ (8.07/00) Scale 1" 30' D&A Properties = BM1 Top of iron pipe 1177.98' Lot BM2 1173.82' 61 1174.50' 82 174.60' 83 1177.03' N01 BM2 6. B2 8' 1174' 131 90' 120' 96' 4% 86' 1176' slop B3 40, A BM1 1178 SE lot corner Thomas Nelson 227387 _uction: 1309689 Introd [6 T On June-24, 2-006;-Thomas Nelson,-CSTM,-Environmental By Design conducted-a-soil and-site-evaluation on property owned by Don & Dave Ault., located in theSWl/4, NEi/4, Section 1, T29N-17W, town of Hammond, platted-as Hof-Mand A Properties Inc subdivision, this purpose tieing to determine the highest level of seasonal soil saturation so that a POWTS might be installed. This investigation revealed that the soils-were only good for an A+O mound system through an interpretive determination as-designated by the Wisconsin Department OfCommerce's Administrative Code, Comm 85. Methodblogy-_ Backhoe.pits-wereprovided for three borings; 1 through 3; with interpretations of the sites-suitability being conducted by using soil redoximorphic features; soil texture, soil structure, soil color pursuant to the guidelines under Chapter Comm 85 of the Wisconsin Administrative Code and using the USDA-NRCS soil descriptive system. During-this field-investigation-the landscapes morphological features, vegetation, and-hydrology was determined for the purpose of this interpretive Determination as defned'in Comm 83:60(2) ofthe Wisconsin- Administrative Code. Upon-completion-of the collected field data, which-included the accurate measurement of the sites featured parameters, site plans, system design, and this interpretive report have been developed for review. The intent is to demonstrate that a minimum of 6 inches of unsaturated soil exists on this site and any influencing factors on this would allow the compliant-installation of a mound system-serving a residential- use-for this property as allowed-under Comm 83.44(3)(b) of the-Wisconsin Administrative Code. Local ITydrology-. The local hydrology of this site is influenced by the average of 30 inches of precipitation received. The soil properties and localized topography both influence water movement on this property. Seasonal issues such as-frozen ground and-warm temperatures-also have their influences-during the winter months-when the ground is frozen, there would be an accumulation of snow with any melting action naming off the site on the surface of the ground. Spring.rains would produce additional surface runoff until the ground has thawed. Upon thawing, the influence on-groundwater levels would be minimal due to the location of the site with its limited-upslope watershed. The 4 percent surface-slope-would also aid the slowerpermeability of the soils. Summer temperatures and plant growth would provide removal of soil moisture through evaporation-and evapotranspiration.- Local Geomorphology, Soil- Disturbance, and Local Topography The geologic interpretation of this area directly related to the glacial geology of the Eastern St. Croix Moraine, a ground-moraine that was- formed-by the accumulation beneath the glacier and resulted in a composition of stony, reddish-brown glacial-drift. Post-glacial windblown silts formed loess deposits that overlays this till. Below is the Cambrian bedrock Prairie Du Chien formation, a dolitimized limestone formation: Soil forming activities have resulted in what is known as the Northern Till Uplands soils resulting in-dark silty soils. The site was probably originally in crop production in previous years. However, at the time of this determination-it-was-grass.-This hillside has a-4 percent-slopes and-was probably formed-as the advancing ice-scoured the-landscape, retreated; depositing the-till material, forming the-rounded knobs of the-hillside. Soil Series and Mapping Units The St. Croix County Soil Survey_ has mapped this area as being-of Freeon soil series, which consists of gently sloping, moderately well drained soils. These soils are on low" ridges and foot slopes of ground moraines: They formed in-silty sediment and the underlying reddish sandy loam till. The-FoR soils of this series are representative as described by the Soil Survey and are represented by a surface layer that is approximately 8 inches of dark grayish brown silt loam. The subsurface layer is brown silt loam and about 10 inches-thick. The subsoil is-about-16 inches-thick. The upper part is-dark brown; mottled; friable silt loam; the middle part is a reddish brown, mottled, friable to firm loath; and the lower part is reddish brown, mottled,-firm _loam.-The-substratum,-to a-depth-of 60 inches,-is yellowish red,-mottled,-firm sandy loam.- Data- ➢ The soils evaluation report and system design have been included with this report. A copy of the USDA Soil Survey map-that provides the soil-mapping unit described-above. ➢ A USGS Topographic Map, revealing the topography of the site. POWT site plan, representing the best location and layout of the system thatbest-treats and" distributes the systems discharge water. Government Deports Leroy Jansky,-Wisconsin-Department-of Commerce-Wastewater-Specialist,-will-visit-this property.- Additional Informati-ow Unique to the site- During the evaluation there was the observation of biological activity in the form of worm burrows-and roots. Worm activity was recognized at a depth of 9 inches in boring 1, and at a depth of 8 inches in boring 2. Root activity was observed at 14 inches on boring. 1, 16 inches on boring2, 15 inches in boring 3. It is recognized that these biological activities are normally not apparent in zones that are saturated for long periods of time. These factors further support the suggestion" that this portion of the profile dries quickly after a precipitation event. Recommendations The recommendation for the site would be for the site to be chisel plowed to a depth of at least 15 inches so as-to breakup the soil-interface, thus-aiding infiltration. From the upside slope of the system area, 30 inches- 4f ASTM C-33 semi lilt will be-placed on the plowed area, This provittes the 36 inches of vertical separation to provide the treatment of pathogenic organisms. The recommended-mound design-uses a-linear loading rate of 4.5 gpd/ft-and an in-situ-soil-application rate of O.2gpd/f 2. This will be accomplished by designing the absorption area to be long and narrow and extended-the down-slope-toe-area-to a-4:1- dimension,-effectively increasing-the basal area-and-eliminating the-chances of toe-seepage. Additionally, the-slope-on the-upper toe-edge-of the-mound will be-constructer) so as to be a slope with a 3:1 side slope at each end and a 6:1 side slope for the I dimension (upper slope) at a point L/2 (this being the location at half the distance of the total length of the mound) so as to help divert surface water from the upper slope (See included suggested mound detail plan). Finally the design requires- that a water diversion ditch lie" installed above the mound so as to divert- surface waters from the upslope area This should be installed with a 5:1 slope, a width of eleven feet, and oriented so that it traverses the contour slightly,"draining the run off water north and down slope of the mound arm- Conclusions It is my belief that the soils in the area of the proposed POWS will not be saturated above 6" for seven or more consecutive days for the following reasons: The described soils-in this-location supports-the mapped description, which represents-in its- description more sandy clay loams-and silty clay in-the substratum. ➢ The biological activity in the soil as represented by the roots and Earth Worm presence, suggest that the soil has not been saturated in the most recent history of the soils. These activities cannot survive in saturated conditions. ➢ A design with a long and narrow system representing a linear loading rate of 4.5 gallons per day per foot and mum--site soil application rate of.0.2gpd/fl2t This configuration represents the best distribution of the wastewater, spreading it over a longer area. With the increased height of the mound, there is the assurance that there will be 3 feet of filtration between the bottom of the system and the zone of saturation. Also built into the plan is the increased dimension of the upslope of the mound, providing a 6;1 slope at the L/2 location, and the addition ofa drainage ditch above the mound. These last two additional features will minimize surface runoff onto the mound area from higher elevations behind the system. The total design assures that the requirements of Comm. 83.41 of the Wisconsin Administrative Code are being met so as to properly filter the wastewater and to assure that there is no surface discharge, with discharge going below grade. ➢ The--mound- septic-design and management plan provides proper treatment of wastewater and expected system longevity: Accordingly,-the plan submittal addresses the methods and=design for treatment and=dispersal of the wastewater below-the surface-asaddressed=by- the-code- requirements- The restriction:appears over a-sandy loam=with -astructure--of lmsbk-in =borings land=3;-This appears to:be a-situation-wherasaturation=occurs-in:the--overlying-finer-soil-before-it=moves into:the= coarser- material-below. - The final authority for this site's approval rests with the appropriate regulatory agencies: the Wisconsin Department of Commerce and the St. Croix County Zoning officials. Thomas Cxo P.O. W.T. S . CST ~ July 15 2006 Condition ally A P P ROVE DEPARTMENT OF CoMMERCE DIVIS► N OF SAFETY AND 3UILDINGS SEE CO#~ESPOJ~bENCEO Lo T-3 1309689 r. Wisconsin Department of Commerce SOIL EVALUATION REPORT pap 1 of 3 Division of Safety and Buildings in accordance with Comm 85, Wis. Adm. Code COY St. Croix Attach complete site plan on paper not less than 81/2 x 11 inches in size. Plan must include, but not limited to: vertical and horizontal reference point (BM), direction and Paroel I.D. Pending percent slope, scale or dimensions, north arrow, and location and distance to nearest road. Plaasa print all information. Reviewed by Date Personal information you provide may be used for secondary purposes (Privacy Law, a. 15.04 (1) (m)). Property Owner Property Location 1:1 El D and D Properties Gov Lot NWS 1/4 NB 1/4 S 1 T 29 N R 17 Property Owner's Mailing Address Lot # Block # Subd. Name or CSM# 2633 Innsbruck Dr 3 The Shores Of Pine Lake city State Zip Code Phone Number ity Village ■ own Nearest Road New Brighton MN 55112 ( 6)51-635-9157 117th Avenue & 205th St New Construction UseE) Residential / Number of bedrooms 3 to 4 Code derived design flow rate 450 to 600 GPD 0 Replacement ® Public or commercial - Describe: Parent material Loess over glacial Till Flood Plain elevation if applicable NA ft. General comments Site suitable for an A+0 design only and recommendations: r a Boring # 0 Boring - - - - El Pit Ground surface elev. 1174.50 ft. Depth to limiting factor 12 in. Soil --icatiofi Rate ~ Horizon Depth Dominant Color Redox Description Texture Structure Consistence Boundary Roots GPD/fP In. Munsell Qu. Sz. Cont: Color Gr. Sa: SK- *1211#1 *Eff#2 1 0-9 10yr3/2 - sil 2msnk dsh as 2f .6 .8 2 9-12 1 4/4 - sil lmsbk dsh cs If .4 .6 1 3 12-20 10yr4/4 c2d7.5yr5/8 sil lmsbk dsh - if .4 •6 III F 2 Boring # 11 Boring 1174.60 10 El Pit Ground surface elev. ft: Depth to limiting factor in. Soil Application R Horizon Depth Dominant Color Redox Description Texture Structure Consistence Boundary Roots GPDHF in. Munseil Qu. Sz. Cont. Color Gr. Sz. Sh. *Eff#1 *Eff#2 1 0-8 10yr3/2 - sil 2msbk dsh as 2f .6 .8 2 8-10 1 4/4 - sil lmsbk dsh cs if .4 .6 3 10-13 10yr4/4 U7.5yr5/8 sil lmsbk dsh cs if .4 .6 4 13-27 7.5yr4/6 - sl Imsbk dsh - - .4 .7 Effluent #1 = BOD > 30:E 220 mg/- and TSS >30:5 150 mg/L • Effluent #2 = BOD < 30 mg/L and TSS < 30 mg/L CST Name (Please Print) - - Signature CST Number Thomas C Nelson 227387 Address Date Evaluation Conducted Telephone Number 1432 120th Street, New Richmond, W1 asaw (-A-W6 715-246-2454 Property Owner D and D Properties Parcel ID # Fending Page 2 of 3 3 Boring # Boring Q Pit Ground surface elev. 1177.03 ft Depth to limiting factor 11 in. Soil Application Rate Horizon Depth Dominant Color Redox Description Texture Structure Consistence Boundary Roots GPD/ff in. Munsell Qu. Sz. Cont. Color Gr. Sz. Sh. *Ef#1 *Eff#2 1 0-7 10yr3/2 - sil 2msbk dsh as 2f A .8 2 7-11 1 0vr4/4 - sil lmsbk dsh cs if .4 .6 3 11-14 10yr4/4 M7.5yr5/8 sil Imsbk dsh cs if .4 .6 4 14-17 7.5yr4/6 - sl lmsbk dsh - - .4 .7 F-1 Boring # Boring Pit Ground surface elev, ft. Depth to limiting factor in. Sal Application Rate Horizon Depth Dominant Color Redox Description Texture Structure Consistence Boundary Roots GPDMY? in. Munsell Qu. Sz. Cont. Color Gr. Sz. Sh. *Etf#1 *Eff#2 ❑ Boring # S Boring Pit Ground surface elev. ft. Depth to limiting factor in. Sal 'cation Rate Horizon Depth Dominant Color Redox Description Texture Structure Consistence Boundary Roots GPD/fF in. Munsell Qu. Sz. Cont. Color Gr. Sz. Sh. *Eff#1 *Eft#2 * Effluent #1= BOD6 > 30 a 220 nuft and TSS >30 < 150 mg& * Effluent #2 = BODS 5 30 mg/L and TSS 5 30 mg& The Department of Commerce is an equal opportunity service provider and employer. If you need assistance to access services or need material in an alternate format, please contact the department at 608-266-3151 or TTY 608-264-8777. ss"j tegpi.oi/ntij Scale i „ 30' D&A Properties = SM1 Top of iron pipe 1177.98' BM2 1173.82' 131 1174.50' B2 174.60' 63 1177:03' NOO BM2 82 1174 B1 90' 120' 96' 4% slop 86' 1176' B3 40' BM1 117$' SE lot corner Thomas Nelson 227387 Stale 1 30' D&A Properties SM 1 Top of 4ron pipe 117 7 98' @M21173.82' Lot 3 B1 1174 50' 82 174 60' 83 1177.03' 11' wide diversion, ditch w ith 5:1 side slopes Purpose of diverting w ater from the back iBAl12 side of the round. This ditch traverses the l~ contour line and drains SW of the mound Mound Area _ - approximatiy 3T by 136' 82 174' 0.0 silk 4 1178' B A A B' 3M1 A' 117$' SE lot comer Tomas Nelson 11, 11' 227387 1' depth 1' ditch bottom 3 N.~i.RdN-Fn ~ 36 SP.20 72 , ...j U.+71 I f SfA iCSAWVCL f 2241 .733 5 '9L2Pt 45 GOVERNMENTL TN H4MMOND r. C 64328 738 3 GOVERNMENT LOTS / o AA swim [ 73E CSM 154185 FOB 1ffiV426 1 4 , '~~ft~~~S 734 " CWVCL 0 3 v ( ~ dm D2 r3s ¢A f 3 4 SWM4 e6 f r. Tor 1119 ~ ~ x-