Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout018-2007-13-000 (2) Safety and Buildings 10541 N RANCH ROAD commerce.Wl.gov HAYWARD WI 54843 TDD (608) 264-8777 'sco n s n www.commer n / Department of Commerce www.wisconsin.gov Jim Doyle, Governor Mary P. Burke, Secretary RECEINEn December 16, 2005 CUST ID No. 226900 ATTN: POWTS Inspector DEC 1UOi SHAUN R BIRD ZONING OFFICE ST. CROIX COUNTY BIRD PLUMBING, INC ST CROIX COUNTY SPIA 1008 192 ND AVE 1101 CARMICHAEL RD NEW RICHMOND WI 54017 HUDSON WI 54016 CONDITIONAL APPROVAL PLAN APPROVAL EXPIRES: 12/16/2007 Identification Numbers Transaction ID No. 1079376 SITE: PC Collova Builders Site ID No. 692149 Town of Hammond, St Croix County Please refer to both identification numbers, S 1/2, NE 114, S5, T29N, RI 7W above, in all correspondence with the agency. Lot: 13, Subdivision: Farmview Ridge Subd FOR: Object Type: Soil Saturation Determination Regulated Object ID No.: 991552 The submittal described above has been reviewed for conformance with applicable Wisconsin Administrative Codes and Wisconsin Statutes. The submittal has been CONDITIONALLY APPROVED. The owner, as defined in chapter 101.01(10), Wisconsin Statutes, is responsible for compliance with all code requirements. The following conditions shall be met during construction or installation and prior to occupancy or use: 1. Approval is hereby granted pursuant to s. Comm 85.60(2), Wis;Adm. Code, to estimate the depth to seasonal soil saturation based on an interpretive determination process. Approval of the interpretive determination negates the requirement in s. Comm 85.30(2)(b), Wis. Adm. Code to designate the ground surface as the highest level of soil saturation when redoximorphic features are less than 4 inches below the bottom of the A horizon. 2. The estimated highest level of prolonged soil saturation approved under this determination is 6 inches below grade. At least 30 inches of sand lift on top of 6 inches of unsaturated, in-situ soil is required for adequate treatment and dispersal. 3. The basal soil application rate for the mound shall be 0.20 gpd/sf, and the linear loading rate 4.5 gpd/ft. 4. Chisel plowing to a depth of 15 inches immediately prior to sand placement is required to improve vertical water movement into the soil solum. 5. Landscaping up slope of the mound shall be incorporated into the POWTS design to prevent surface water from concentrating along the up slope edge of the mound and to divert surface water drainage away from the system. See recommendations by CST for side slope ratios. 6. An up slope surface water diversion ditch must be installed as per the specifications of the CST. 7. This approval shall remain valid unless the site is altered in such a way that the depth to soil saturation would change or if saturated conditions are observed for seven consecutive days at depths less than 3 feet below the infiltrative surface of the POWTS distribution component. 8. This approval in no way relinquishes the use of color patterns to estimate the depth to high groundwater on any other parcels or portions of parcels. 9. A copy of this approval letter and attachments must accompany the mound system design for this site for purposes of plan approval and sanitary permit issuance. A copy of the approved plans, specifications and this letter shall be on-site during construction and open to inspection by authorized representatives of the Department, which may include local inspectors. If plan index sheets were submitted in lieu of additional full plansets, a copy of this approval letter and index sheet shall be attached to plans that correspond with the copy on file with the Department. All permits required by the state or the local SHAUN R BIRD Page 2 12/16/2005 municipality shall be obtained prior to commencement of construction/installation/operation. If this construction project will disturb one or more acres of land, an Erosion Control Notice of Intent (NOI) shall be filed with the department 14 days prior to any earth disturbing activities. In granting this approval the Division of Safety & Buildings reserves the right to require changes or additions should conditions arise making them necessary for code compliance. As per state stats 101.12(2), nothing in this review shall relieve the designer of the responsibility for designing a safe building, structure, or component. Inquiries concerning this correspondence may be made to me at the telephone number listed below, or at the address on this letterhead. Sincerely, Fee Required $ 100.00 Fee Received $ 100.00 Balance Due $ 0.00 Leroy G. sky, PS , Waste er Specialist Integrated Services Bureau WiSMART code: 7633 (715)726-2544 Voice (715)726-2549 Fax lj ansky@commerce.state.wi.us < Safety and Buildings 10541 N RANCH ROAD commerce.Wi.gov HAYWARD WI 54843 TDD (608) 264-8777 sco n n www.commerce.wi.gov/sb/ www.wisco isconsinsin.go .gov Department of Commerce Jim Doyle, Governor Mary P. Burke, Secretary December 16, 2005 CUST ID No. 226900 ATTN: POWTS Inspector SHAUN R BIRD ZONING OFFICE BIRD PLUMBING, INC ST CROIX COUNTY SPIA 1008 192 ND AVE 1101 CARMICHAEL RD NEW RICHMOND WI 54017 HUDSON WI 54016 CONDITIONAL APPROVAL PLAN APPROVAL EXPIRES: 12/16/2007 Identification Numbers Transaction ID No. 1079376 SITE: PC Collova Builders Site ID No. 692149 Town of Hammond, St Croix County Please refer to both identification numbers, S 1/2 NE 1/4, S5, T29N, R17W above, in all correspondence with the agency. ot: 1 Subdivision: Farmview Ridge Subd FOR: Object Type: Soil Saturation Determination Regulated Object ID No.: 991552 The submittal described above has been reviewed for conformance with applicable Wisconsin Administrative Codes and Wisconsin Statutes. The submittal has been CONDITIONALLY APPROVED. The owner, as defined in chapter 101.01(10), Wisconsin Statutes, is responsible for compliance with all code requirements. The following conditions shall be met during construction or installation and prior to occupancy or use: 1. Approval is hereby granted pursuant to s. Comm 85.60(2), Wis. Adm. Code, to estimate the depth to seasonal soil saturation based on an interpretive determination process. Approval of the interpretive determination negates the requirement in s. Comm 85.30(2)(b), Wis. Adm. Code to designate the ground surface as the highest level of soil saturation when redoximorphic features are less than 4 inches below the bottom of the A horizon. 2. The estimated highest level of prolonged soil saturation approved under this determination is 6 inches below grade. At least 30 inches of sand lift on top of 6 inches of unsaturated, in-situ soil is required for adequate treatment and dispersal. 3. The basal soil application rate for the mound shall be 0.20 gpd/sf, and the linear loading rate 4.5 gpd/ft. 4. Chisel plowing to a depth of 15 inches immediately prior to sand placement is required to improve vertical water movement into the soil solum. 5. Landscaping up slope of the mound shall be incorporated into the POWTS design to prevent surface water from concentrating along the up slope edge of the mound and to divert surface water drainage away from the system. See recommendations by CST for side slope ratios. 6. An up slope surface water diversion ditch must be installed as per the specifications of the CST. 7. This approval shall remain valid unless the site is altered in such a way that the depth to soil saturation would change or if saturated conditions are observed for seven consecutive days at depths less than 3 feet below the infiltrative surface of the POWTS distribution component. 8. This approval in no way relinquishes the use of color patterns to estimate the depth to high groundwater on any other parcels or portions of parcels. 9. A copy of this approval letter and attachments must accompany the mound system design for this site for purposes of plan approval and sanitary permit issuance. A copy of the approved plans, specifications and this letter shall be on-site during construction and open to inspection by authorized representatives of the Department, which may include local inspectors. If plan index sheets were submitted in lieu of additional full plansets, a copy of this approval letter and index sheet shall be attached to plans that correspond with the copy on file with the Department. All permits required by the state or the local i • SHAUN R BIRD Page 2 12/16/2005 municipality shall be obtained prior to commencement of construction/installation/operation. If this construction project will disturb one or more acres of land, an Erosion Control Notice of Intent (NOI) shall be filed with the department 14 days prior to any earth disturbing activities. In granting this approval the Division of Safety & Buildings reserves the right to require changes or additions should conditions arise making them necessary for code compliance. As per state stats 101.12(2), nothing in this review shall relieve the designer of the responsibility for designing a safe building, structure, or component. Inquiries concerning this correspondence may be made to me at the telephone number listed below, or at the address on this letterhead. Sincerely, Fee Required $ 100.00 Fee Received $ 100.00 J~j ' Balance Due $ 0.00 Leroy G. nsky, PS , Waste er Specialist Integrated Services Bureau WiSMART code: 7633 (715)726-2544 Voice (715)726-2549 Fax 1jansky@commerce.state.wi.us NORTH- UN PLATTED LANDS N " 3-4,3.2V - - 250.84' 283.65' 200.11' 231 J cl, LA m LA m 4-4 OD O NCOir X~' WOw 1 1~ I ' ~oLA I I~ ;o CA (A " j t ~r (A F) LA (A . C, CO CAI F N \ cn CA N N p ~ \s~ O \ \ ~ - J ~ ` I •p ~~v >N \ J ° 0 C"% C1,7 7 C~ ca jr -4I J OD \ \ \ ~,A`~/ A(~ b) Ul > D N ""90- cn 40 N I SZ1 ,Z8'£6£ „ 0,£1.00 N 0 OD r CUUMAA I u w I NJ W to ID rn I I a o W~ Q~v ~ I \ C1)~ I0 03®8'19" E rn 101 1 ~ N to I w I IZ \ En (A .0. I -I z > co -P, Q5 i, Z: co 150.32' co Loa g a N I ~OD oUb I \ co 71 N \ zl IM I(3; -,a) \N C ,LS'£L£ M "9bCWN I o I L. co v a ~ (T ~ Z J 1N ~D ~ n to ?t 0 001 . 0 N N j \jj 1NT \ I I ~~JJffjj~~ I Ito ,59'Z9Z wa ~tO r w N Iw I I N :-n ca l~a\``Z o p N P. I Ia, 71 t£A 0 N - I I ~ 0' l9Z N 07 32'21 " E ~ - L_ - ' 1 qlz- L optnawmeo -"„'21 214.15 112.60 flar 2AR I Io \p 247.40• S 00'08'03" W 557.04' .<Z0 r OZ I UNP TIED LANDS P ~ N ~ W~ 1°s o Y ~i A ,110 ~N y 1 m x 6 m 0, y 1 I in N Iw o I I w ~ I ~ w N •P „lc„ o, !n Io° °D U) IJ -4 V Imo rn 0 t! a) >0 lz aQ ,9019Zl \~\\~~/J~ 6w,~ \ ~F26 Ir> m - _ /O \ 9 I z Mn6S,t£.00N C, j L~ N jV N \ CSC \ O\ Ci' N P o ~ t+ IN O ap w Z Go \ R \ \ v pl N bo ON \ \ 6v I \ Imp \ C5 LA > 10 7931 76 4 Introduction: On June 15, 2005, Thomas Nelson, CSTM, Environmental By Design conducted a soil and site evaluation on property owned by Collova Brothers Inc., located in the SE1/4, SWl/4, Section 5, T29N-17W, town of Hammond, platted as lot 13 of Farm View Ridge subdivision, this purpose being to determine the highest level of seasonal soil saturation so that a POWTS might be installed. This investigation revealed that the soils were only good for an A+0 mound system through an interpretive determination as designated by the Wisconsin Department Of Commerce's Administrative Code, Comm 85. Methodology: Backhoe pits were provided for four borings, 1 through 4, with interpretations of the sites suitability being conducted by using soil redoximorphic features, soil texture, soil structure, soil color pursuant to the guidelines under Chapter Comm 85 of the Wisconsin Administrative Code and using the USDA-NRCS soil descriptive system. During this field investigation the landscapes morphological features, vegetation, and hydrology was determined for the purpose of this interpretive Determination as defined in Comm 85.60(2) of the Wisconsin Administrative Code. Upon completion of the collected field data, which included the accurate measurement of the sites featured parameters, site plans, system design, and this interpretive report have been developed for review. The intent is to demonstrate that a minimum of 6 inches of unsaturated soil exists on this site and any influencing factors on this would allow the compliant installation of a mound system serving a residential use for this property as allowed under Comm 83.44(3)(b) of the Wisconsin Administrative Code. Local Hydrology: The local hydrology of this site is influenced by the average of 30 inches of precipitation received. The soil properties and localized topography both influence water movement on this property. Seasonal issues such as frozen ground and warm temperatures also have their influences during the winter months when the ground is frozen, there would be an accumulation of snow with any melting action running off the site on the surface of the ground. Spring rains would produce additional surface runoff until the ground has thawed. Upon thawing, the influence on groundwater levels would be minimal due to the location of the site with its limited upslope watershed. The 3 percent surface slope would also aid the slower permeability of the soils. Summer temperatures and plant growth would provide removal of soil moisture through evaporation and evapotranspiration. Local Geomorphology, Soil Disturbance, and Local Topography The geologic interpretation of this area directly related to the glacial geology of the Eastern St. Croix Moraine, a ground moraine that was formed by the accumulation beneath the glacier and resulted in a composition of stony, reddish-brown glacial drift. Post-glacial windblown silts formed loess deposits that overlays this till. Below is the Cambrian bedrock Prairie Du Chien formation, a dolitimized limestone formation. Soil forming activities have resulted in what is known as the Northern Till Uplands soils resulting in dark silty soils. The site was probably originally in crop production prior to its development. Currently it is planted in winter wheat with stem heights being 2 to 3 feet in length. This hillside has a 3 percent slopes and was probably formed as the advancing ice scoured thec,"Vated, depositing the till material, forming the rounded knobs of the hillside. Conditionally RECEIVED APPROWEDN DEC 13 2005 DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE DIVI QN OF SAFETY AND BUILDINGSACETY & BUILDINGS SEE C RES NDENC^ Soil Series and Mapping Units The St. Croix County Soil Survey has mapped this area as being of Vlasaty silt loam, 2 to 6 percent slopes, which consists of gently sloping, moderately well drained soils. These soils are on low ridges and knolls of ground moraines. They formed in silty sediment and the underlying clay loam till. The VaB soils of this series are representative as described by the Soil Survey and are represented by a surface layer that is approximately 8 inches of dark grayish brown silt loam. The subsurface layer is dark yellowish brown, friable, heavy silt loam and about 31 inches thick. The upper part is dark brown, friable, heavy silt loam; and the lower part is brown and dark grayish brown, very fain, mottled clay loam. The substratum, to a depth of 60 inches, is olive brown, mottled, very firm clay loam. Data ➢ The soils evaluation report and system design have been included with this report. A copy of the USDA Soil Survey map that provides the soil-mapping unit described above. ➢ A USGS Topographic Map, revealing the topography of the site. ➢ POWT site plan, representing the best location and layout of the system that best treats and distributes the systems discharge water. Reports Government Leroy Jansky, Wisconsin Department of Commerce Wastewater Specialist, has visited the site and found no reason not to support the site's soils and landscape position, being suitable for an A+0 mound septic system. Additional Information Unique to the site During the evaluation there was the observation of biological activity in the form of worm burrows and roots. Worm activity was recognized at a depth of 8 inches in boring 1 and at a depth of 9 inches in boring two, and 8 inches in boring 3. Root activity was observed at 12 inches on boring 1, 12 inches on boring 2, and 13 inches on boring 3. It is recognized that these biological activities are normally not apparent in zones that are saturated for long periods of time. This being a first year crop (winter wheat) and a very wet spring, these factors further support the suggestion that this portion of the profile dries quickly after a precipitation event. Recommendations The recommendation for the site would be for the site to be chisel plowed to a depth of at least 15 inches so as to breakup the soil interface and reorient the platy structure in a more vertical position, thus aiding infiltration. From the upside slope of the system area, 30 inches of ASTM C-33 sand lift will be placed on the plowed area. This provides the 36 inches of vertical separation to provide the treatment of pathogenic organisms. The recommended mound design uses a linear loading rate of 4.5 gpd/ft and an in-situ soil application rate of 0.2gpd/ft2. This will be accomplished by designing the absorption area to be long and narrow and extended the down slope toe area to a 4:1 dimension, effectively increasing the basal area and eliminating the chances of toe seepage. Additionally, the slope on the upper toe edge of the mound will be constructed so as to be a slope with a 3:1 side slope at each end and a 6:1 side slope for the I dimension (upper slope) at a point L/2 (this being the location at half the distance of the total length of the mound) so as to help divert surface water from the upper slope (See included suggested mound detail plan). Finally the design requires that a water diversion ditch be installed above the mound so as to divert surface waters from the upslope area This should be installed with a 5:1 slope, a width of eleven feet, and oriented so that it traverses the contour slightly, draining the run off water north and down slope of the mound area, Conclusions It is my belief that the soils in the area of the proposed POWS will not be saturated above 6" for seven or more consecutive days for the following reasons: Y The described soils in this location supports some the mapped description, which represents in its description more sandy clay loams and silty clay in the substratum. The platy soils located in the substratum can be over come by the deep chisel plowing so as to reorient the clay particles in a more vertical orientation. Y The biological activity in the soil as represented by the roots and Earth Worm presence, suggest that the soil has not been saturated in the most recent history of the soils. These activities cannot survive in saturated conditions. A design with a long and narrow system representing a linear loading rate of 4.5 gallons per day per foot and an in-site soil application rate of .0.2gpdiA2L. This configuration represents the best distribution of the wastewater, spreading it over a longer area. With the increased height of the mound, there is the assurance that there will be 3 feet of filtration between the bottom of the system and the zone of saturation. Also built into the plan is the increased dimension of the upslope of the mound, providing a 6:1 slope at the L/2 location, and the addition of a drainage ditch above the mound. These last two additional features will minimize surface runoff onto the mound area from higher elevations behind the system. The total design assures that the requirements of Comm. 83.41 of the Wisconsin Administrative Code are being met so as to properly filter the wastewater and to assure that there is no surface discharge, with discharge going below grade. ➢ The mound septic design and management plan provides proper treatment of wastewater and expected system longevity. Accordingly, the plan submittal addresses the methods and design for treatment and dispersal of the wastewater below the surface as addressed by the code requirements. The month of May and early June had a great number of rain event days and even with this unusual amount of precipitation the holes had no free water. Additionally, the redox features that were observed were progressively more intense deeper in the soils profile suggesting that the upper levels where redox features were observed were not saturated for as long of periods of time. The final authority for this site's approval rests with the appropriate regulatory agencies: the Wisconsin Department of Commerce and the St. Croix County Zoning officials. Thomas C WO-W- 227387 November 8 2005 Seto MME Yro6,V- 53 Sr- Ck*IX CO. Ult. SakWY Ga B FRt,R~+ st~..iawvy s'+is*+~c~rwr► 2-t Sup" Aft. Scat, 8 " = l• H Ur J s 3 -►Qweer s~ swsK too snc+s:u►.a 2. 7; s~.Pcs a.paf J e g Jtwatr s11 ""Y& L C Ar LAwt °t R Ttt 6"3'1s Sto?d3 v 4.. ~fLAsn'tr{ sl 2 .C~7o sties W 7: F ~ > Y.~• kyfi'.. <y, y4x 75.0 ~zE y : e7A ~ . t~ i r . i.t4 x _ ill _ a K~. ~ r` s a~F • ilk x '~w 4 r r x r Y s T f,2~. `rt` ate "~P' ;TIF a 77 e~ ~ x 3 c d ~ s. v N x j L. ~i X.jc _ F; ^,x - s•yL N L t ...wL ,Y~ K a.(...! ' ~4.:: " 9CK ~a"tl' boa ' ~'.x c 4 ~ S N"P`' _ ~4✓d ~Y Y h N~iFpK 4 ~y~~ A t M~° ~ P.W ! • "a iy8'~ 1 ~ L ` x i JIM, From: Thomas Nelson 715.248-2454 To: Leroy Jansky Date: 1 211 81200 5 Time: 12:47:40 PM Page 3 of 3 A' A 11' B 11 B2 A ditch bottom 1' depth 101' 11' WIDE DIVERSION DITCH 5:1 SIDE SLOPES FOR THE U2 PURPOSE OF DIVERTING SURFACE WATER FROM THE B' BACK SIDE OF THE MOUND. SIOp This ditch traverses the contour and drains B3 south of the mound. 160' B 44' B1 111' 114' 49' Mound area 102' approximatly 37' by 136' 13111111111 71' 100, Scale 1" 30' BM1 Top of iron pipe 100.00' BM2 BM2 Top of iron pipe 97.76' B1 102.30' 82103.35' 83101.76' 116' SW Lot c r Thomas C Nelsen Farm View Ridge 227387 Lot 13 Wisconsin Department of Commerce SOIL EVALUATION REPORT Page 1 of 3 Division of Safety and Buildings cxorciance with Comm 85, Wi C c r ~ G Co my St. Croix Attach complete site plan on paper not /2 x inc in sPM+tiSt° include, but not limited to: vertical and horizontal re ere M), direction and Pa I I.D. lie percent slope, scale or dimensions, no and location an distant ttq pearel'roedn~ p7 - Please print all Information. 1~1 L LU Re ed'by Date Personal information you provide maybe used for seconds ~T ry purposes( vacyLawsa Property Owner Prope Lo PC Collova Builders Govt. Lot NW 1/4 SE 1/4 S 13 T 29 N R 17 E (or) W Property Owner's Mailing Address Lot # Block # Subd. Name or CSM# PO Box 489 13 Farm View Ridge City State Zip Code Phone Number ity village ■ own Nearest Road Somerset Wl 54025 ( 715-247-2742 Hammond 70th Street New Construction UseE] Residential / Number of bedrooms 3 to 4 Code derived design flow rate 450 to 600 GPD 0 Replacement Public or commercial - Describe: Parent material Loess over glacial till Flood Plain elevation if applicable ETA ft. General comments Site has been determined to he an A+0 site, requiring an Tnterpretive Determination as allowed by the Wisconsin and recommendations: State Administrative Code, COMM 85 ❑ Boring # 11 Boring El Pit Ground surface elev. 102.30 ft. Depth to limiting factor 6 in. Soil Application Rate Horizon Depth Dominant Color Redox Description Texture Structure Consistence Boundary Roots GPD/fP in. Munsell Qu. Sz. Cont. Color Gr. Sz. Sh. "Eff#1 "042 1 0-6 10yr3/2 sil 2msbk mfr as 2f .6 .8 2 6-16 1 4/3 c2f10yr5/6 sicl 2mpl mfr cw If .0 .2 3 16-21 10yr4/3 c2d7.5yr5/6,10yr6/3 sicl 2mpl mfr cw - .0 .2 4 21-29 7.5yr4/3 m3p5yr5/8 scl lmsbk mfr cw - .2 .3 5 29-32 10yr5/2 m2p7.5yr5/8 Cl Om mfi - - .0 .0 2 Boring # Boring 103.35 7 ❑ Pit Ground surface elev. ft. Depth to limiting factor in. Soil Application Rate Horizon Depth Dominant Color Redox Description Texture Structure Consistence Boundary Roots GPD/fF in. Munseli Qu. Sz. Cont. Color Gr. Sz. Sh. "Eff#1 "Eff#2 1 0-7 10yr3/2 sil 2msbk mfr as 2f .6 .8 2 7-15 1 4/3 c20.5yr5/6, 10yr6/3 sicl 2mpl mfr cw if .0 .2 3 15-30 7.5yr4/3 m3p5yr5/8 scl lmsbk mfr .2 .3 I ' Effluent #1 = BOD > 30:5 220 mg/L and TSS X30:5 150 mg/L "Effluent #2 = BOD < 30 mg/L and TSS < 30 mg/L CST Name (Please Print) Signature CST Number Thomas C Nelson 227387 Address Date Evaluation Conducted Telephone Number 1432 120th Street, New Richmond, Wl June 15, 2005 715-246-2454 Property Owner_ Colloval3 Parcel ID # Pending Page 2 of 3 FTI Borin # Boring g Q pit Ground surface elev. 101.75 ft. Depth to limiting factor 6 in. Soil Application Rate Horizon Depth Dominant Color Redox Description Texture Structure Consistence Boundary Roots GPD/fF in. Munsell Qu. Sz. Cont. Color Gr. Sz. Sh. *Eff#1 *Eff#2 1 0-6 10yr3/2 - sil 2msbk mfr as 2f .6 .8 2 6-14 1 4/3 c2f7.5 5/6, 1 /3 sicl 2m 1 mfr as if .0 .2 3 14-20 10yr4/3 c2d7.5yr5/6, 10yr6/3 sicl linsbk mfr - - .2 .3 Boring# HBoring F-1 Pit Ground surface elev. ft. Depth to limiting factor in. Soil -Application Rate Horizon Depth Dominant Color Redox Description Texture Structure Consistence Boundary Roots GPD/ft' in. Munsell Qu. Sz. Cont. Color Gr. Sz. Sh. *Eff##1 *Eff#2 ❑ Boring # Boring Pit Ground surface elev. ft. Depth to limiting factor in. Soil Application Rate Horizon Depth Dominant Color Redox Description Texture Structure Consistence Boundary Roots GPQtfF in. Munsell Qu. Sz. Cont. Color Gr. Sz Sh. *Eff#1 *Eff#2 * Effluent #1 = BODS > 30 < 220 mg/L and TSS >30 < 150 mg/L * Effluent #2 = BOD, a 30 mg/L and TSS < 30 mg/L The Department of Commerce is an equal opportunity service provider and employer. If you need assistance to access services or need material in an alternate format, please contact the department at 608-266-3151 or TTY 608-264-8777. M-8330Teg (R.07/00) 82 10'1' slop 83 160' 44' B1 111' 114' 49' 102' BM1 71' 100, Scale 1" = 30' BM1 Top of iron pipe 100.00' 1311112 BM2 Top of iron pipe $7.75' B1 102.30' B210.5' B3 1011.775' 115' SW Lot c r Thomas C Nelson Farm View Ridge ~01 227387 Lot 13 SAFETY AND BUILDINGS DIVISION li commerce.wl.gov Integrated Services Bureau 13 East Spruce Street INSPECTION REPORT Chippewa Falls, WI 54729 i s c o n s i n (715)726-2544 www.com 715) iDepartment of Commerce Date of Inspection: June 9, 2005 Plumber Name and Address: Project Name: Collova Unknown Use: Residential Legal Description: NE-NW, SE, 5, 29, 17W Site Number: NA Subdivision: Lots 5, 8, 9, and 13-15, Certified Soil Tester Name and Address: Farmview Ridge Tom Nelson, CST 227387 Municipality: Town of Hammond 1432 120th Street County: St. Croix New Richmond WI 54017 Plan Transaction Number: NA Owner Name and Address: Sanitary Permit Number: NA P. C. Collova Builders PO Box 489 Wastewater Flow: 450 gpd Somerset WI 54025 Persons Present: T. Nelson An onsite soils verification was conducted at the above referenced site as per district policy for all sites with less than four inches of unsaturated soil below the bottom of the A horizon. The intent of this investigation is to confirm initial observations by the certified soil tester (CST) relating to the presence or absence of redoximorphic features in the A horizon and/or subsoil. In-situ soil texture, structure, and consistence factors were also reviewed as they relate to wastewater application rates. Other site conditions such as percent and direction of slope, landscape position, land surface contour length, and surface water hydrology may also be noted and their effects are factors considered in the recommendations and conclusions portion of this report. This investigation is the second one on these lots due to a change in certified soil testers and poor weather and lighting conditions on November 29, 2004, when the initial onsite investigation was completed. Lot 5 (A+2) 00-04" 10YR 3/2 sil, 2msbk, mfr, as. 04-07" 10YR 3/3 sil, 1 mpl, mfr, as. 07-09" 10YR 4/4 cl, 1 mpl, mfr, cw. 09-12 10YR 4/4 cl, 1 csbk, mfr, with f2f 10YR 5/6 rmfs. Lot 8-9 (A+O) 00-04" 10YR 3/2 sil, 2msbk, mfr, as. 04-08" 10YR 3/2 sil, 2msbk, mfr, as, with f1d 7.5YR 5/6 rmfs. 08-11" 10YR 4/4 scl, 2msbk, mfr, no rmfs. Lot 13 (A+0) 00-06" 10YR 2/2 sil, 2csbk, mfr, cw. 06-12" 10YR 4/3 cl, 2mpl, mfr, w/ c2f 10YR 5/6 and 6/3 rmfs. I Lot 14 (A<O) Similar to Lot 15 below except the subsoil lacks redox features for 3-4 inches below the A horizon. Possible plow pan tension saturation might be expected since no redox were observed immediately below the A horizon. Lot 15 (A<O) 00-06" 7.5YR 2.5/2 sil, 2msbk, mfr, cw 06-11" 7.5YR 2.5/2 sil, 3msbk, mfr, as, w/f2d 7.5YR 5/6 rmfs. 11-15" 7.5YR 4/3 cl, 1 csbk, mfr, f2f 7.5YR 5/6 rmfs. Page 2 of 2 June 9, 2005 P.C. Collova Site Two other hand borings on Lot 15 revealed similar conditions. Redox features were observed in the A horizon and in the subsoil below. If mound systems are designed to overcome limitations of a high level of seasonal soil saturation and slow permeability, the linear loading rate should not exceed 4.5 gpd/ft and the basal wastewater application rated should not exceed 0.2 gpd/ft2. The additional basal area will partially compensate for the gentle land slope and prevent wastewater leakage at the mound toe. At least 30 inches of sand lift is recommended when applying septic tank effluent to the distribution cell of the mound to ensure proper treatment. The longest portion of the mound must be orientated along the contour. The mound shall be constructed to divert surface water around the mound structure as much as possible. In addition, an up slope drainage ditch should be considered if it is determined that surface or subsurface hydrology is improved by intercepting water and diverting it away from the mound site. Deep chisel plowing may be needed to improve the permeability where a plow pan appears to restrict downward water movement. Special Comments: 1. The down slope toe of the proposed mound area on Lot 5 should be well clear of the drainage way. Soil conditions near the drainage way are very marginal for proper dispersal of effluent from a mound system immediately up slope. It is recommended that the proposed mound area be moved approximately 50 feet up slope. Property line boundaries would have to be reconfigured or an easement granted for placement of the mound on Lot 4. Soil tests would need to be redone to verify suitable conditions in the new area. 2. Even though I specified the maximum linear loading to be 4.5 gpd/ft, designers should try to design systems at 3.5 to 4.0 gpd/ft if possible. 3. Two soil borings in the proposed mound area on Lot 15 exhibited redox concentrations in the lower part of the A horizon and immediately below in the subsoil. This area is somewhat more level than other areas and more precipitation may infiltrate than on a sloping site. In addition, agricultural practices may have caused some compaction in the lower part of the A horizon and upper part of the B horizon. The combination of more infiltration and weak soil compaction may result in a higher level of saturation at this site than at other areas of the plat. Options include moving to another area on the lot, monitoring the area with observation pipes this next spring [see Comm 85.60(3) for requirements], or compiling a convincing explanation of why this is occurring and why it's not a problem for proper system operation. If there are any questions regarding this report, please contact me. Leroy G. Jansky, Wastewater Specialist cc: ❑ County ❑ Plumber Ljansky@commerce.state.wi.us E-mail ❑ CST ❑ Owner 715/726-2544 Voice 715/726-2549 Fax ❑ Other I i i i J EVALUATION REPORT Page of Wisconsin Department of Commerce SOIL Division of Safety and Buildings in accordance with Comm 85, Wis. Adm. Code County Attach complete site plan on paper not less than 8 1/2 x 11 inches in size. Plan must ion and d BM) stan1ce two near st road. Parcel t D Date and percent but not Ir to: vertical north arrow, and reference percent slope, scale Reviewed by Please print all information. Personal information you provide may be used for secondary purposes (?rivscy sj 9d Property Owner i Lot 114 114 S T O / N R E (or P W C' [ ,5 /7 ~ e or CSKV r/ W # Block # Subd. } Address aili Property M ng Add i / ~ d /r- t7l) city ❑ Village Town Nearest Ro City State y Zip a Phone Number \ derived design flow rate GPD New Construction Us Residential / Number of bedrooms Code commercial - Describe; ft. co mme C3 Public or Replacement n if applicable ❑ ~ I Parent material Flood Plain elevation an General d recommendations: ~ ~.i y S y~Cy e_ ✓e l ~L ' v / r !/'J (7 ' a S Ct , (y~ Boring O in. a, -4- ft Depth to limiting factor 1 _ E Boring # r Ground surface elev. Pit M Texture Structure Consistence e Boundary Horizon Depth Dominant Cdor Redox pescxiptiGr. Sz. Sh. in. Munsell Qu. Sz. Cont. Color n~ , 3IL fr Ali In 2 Soil lication Rate Boring It Boring 9 Pit Ground surface elev. Q9~ ft, Depth to limiting factor in. Horizon Depth Dominant Color Redox Description Texture Structure Consistence Boundary Roots GPD/fF `Eff#1 'Eff#2 in. Munsell Qu. Sz. Cons Color Gr. Sz. Sh. ! / ~ Z - s L'z ~ s c' ~ • Effluent #2 = BOD < 30 mg& and TSS < 30 mg/L = 30 220 mglL and TSS >30 `-150 Number Effluent #1 BOD > ST Number Nam (Please Print) I re CST Bird Plumbing, Inc. Shaun Bird 226900 Number Date Evaluation Conducted phone Address r 715-246-4516 1008 192nd Ave, New Richmond, WI 54 7 c- ' 0 ~ l # Iv Parcel ID # Page of Property Owner ® Boring # Boring / Ground surface elev! b ft. Depth to limiting factor in. Soil Application Rate r .Pit Horizon Depth Dominant Color Redox Description Texture Structure Consistence Boundary Roots GPDM •Eff#1 'Etf#2 in. Munsell Ou. Sz. Cont. Color Gr. Sz. Sh. 2 -a 10 i z 0 e j 1/1 ~r r✓)~t - 3 a Boring # ° Boring ❑ Pit Ground surface elev. ft. Depth to limiting factor in Sal Application Rate Horizon Depth Dominant Col Redox Description Texture Structure Consistence Boundary Roots GPD/fP in. Munsell Ou. Sz. Cont. Color Gr. Sz. Sh. `Eff#1 'Eff#2 ❑ Boring # ❑ Boring limiting factor in. ❑ Ground surface elev. ft. Depth to Soil Application Rate . Pit Horizon Depth Dominant Color Redox Description. Texture Structure Consistence. Boundary Roots GPD/fP in. Munsell Qu. Sz. Cont. Color Gr. S z. Sh. `Eff#1 `Eff#2 Effluent #1 = BODE > 30 1220 mg/L and TSS >30 150 mg/L ` Effluent #2 = BODS < 30 mg/L and TSS 30 mg/L TTY 608-264-g777. services or The Department of Commerce is an equal format, opportunity service provider the department at 608-266-3151 or assistance need material in an alternate P 3848330 (8.6100) Soil Test Plot Pla Project Name P.C. Collova Bldrs. Inc. Sha d Address P.O. Box 489 Somerset Wi 54025 e 26900 Lot 13 Subdivision Farm View Ridge Date 8/04 NW 1/4 SE 1/4S 5 T 29 N/R17 W Township Hammond F-I Boring Q Well PL Property Line County ST. CROIX BM or VRP Assume Elevation 100 ft. Top of Survey Iron System Elevation 102.8' *HRpSameasBenchmark Alternate Benchmark Top of 1/2" Pipe @ 100.2' 320' Property Line Scale is 1" = 40' unless otherwise noted B-10 Property Line B-3 4% Slope B-2 100.5' 99.5' 412' Property Line Safety and Buildings commerce.wi. Ov 13 E. Spruce Street g Chippewa Falls, WI 54729 www. com merce.wi.gov/sb/ Itisconsin www.vfisconsin.gov Department of Commerce Jim Doyle, Governor Cory L. Nettles, Secretary November 16, 2004 CUST ID No. 226900 Fee Required $ 100.00 Fee Received $ 100.00 Balance Due $ 0.00 WiSMART code: 7633 SHAUN R BIRD BIRD PLUMBING, INC 1008 192 ND AVE NEW RICHMOND WI 54017 REQUEST FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION SITE: PC Collova Builders Town of Hammond, St Croix County S 1/2, NE 1/4, S5, T29N, R17W Identification Numbers Lot: 13, Subdivision: Farmview Ridge Transaction ID No. 1079376 Site ID No. 692149 FOR: Object Type: Soil Saturation Determination Please refer to both identification Regulated Object ID No.: 991552 numbers, above, in all correspondence with the agency. The submittal described above has been placed on HOLD and the review and approval is pending subject to receipt of the ADDITIONAL INFORMATION and/or revised plans requested by this letter. Upon receipt of the additional information and/or revised plans, the plans will be reviewed for compliance to applicable Wisconsin Administrative Codes and Wisconsin Statutes. The following must be corrected/revised and accompany the resubmittal: 1. The Interpretative Determination report does not adequately show that this lot has at least 6 inches of suitable soil for a mound system. The narrative has a number of discrepancies, errors, omissions, and inconsistencies that need to be addressed prior to approval. The submitted may want to consider engaging a licensed professional soil scientist to help with submittal of the revised report. See comments on the report submitted under Transaction Number 1079283 for further explanation. 2. It would be very helpful to have a full-size copy of both the preliminary and final plat maps for this subdivision. SHAUN R BIRD Page 2 11/16/2004 3. Submit three (3) properly sealed, legible, and permanent copies of all revised documents for review. Send your resubmittal into the address listed above, unless otherwise noted, and the department will review the resubmittal within 5 working days of receipt date. Please include a copy of this letter with your resubmittal. If you have any questions, after reading the above comments and related code sections cited, please call me at the telephone number below. If the above requested information and/or plans are not received within 30 business days of the date of this correspondence, this submittal will be returned denied. No fees will be refunded, and a new fee, application form, and submittal of plans/specifications will be required should you desire to continue with this project. The code in effect at the time of new submittal would apply. Sincerely, Leroy G. Jansky, RPSS, Wastewater Specialist Integrated Services Bureau (715) 726-2544 Voice (715) 726-2549 Fax lj ansky@commerce. state.wi.us cc: PC Collova Builders Inc Zoning Office St Croix County SPIA I,