Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout018-2007-15-000 • RECEIVED GAS Satety and Buildings commerce.wi.gov 10541 N RANCH ROAD HAYWARD WI 54843 1sc0ns/~ OEC 1 9 2005 TDD#:(608)264-8777 commerce.wi.gov/sb/ Department of Commerce ST. CROIX COUNTY www.wisconsin.gov Jim Doyle, Governor Mary P. Burke, Secretary December 16, 2005 CUST ID No. 226900 Fee Required $ 100.00 V~-1 ` Fee Received $ 100.00 SHAUN R BIRD Balance Due $ 0.00 BIRD PLUMBING, INC ~ 1008 192 ND AVE L ~L Ito NEW RICHMOND WI 54017 N~ WiSMART code: 7633 FILE CLOSED Identification Numbers Transaction ID No. 1079441 SITE: PC Collova Builders Site ID No. 692155 Town of Hammond, St Croix County Please refer to both identification numbers, S 1/2, NE 1/4, S5, T29N, R17W above, in all correspondence with the agency. Lot: 15, Subdivision: Farmview Ridge Subd FOR: Object Type: Soil Saturation Determination Regulated Object ID No.: 991565 Due to failure to respond to our request(s) for additional information, the submittal as described above has been CLOSED, with no action taken. No refunds of fees paid to date shall be made. One copy of the submittal will be retained in the office listed above. The balance of the submittal is being returned. Should you desire to proceed with this project, new fees, completed application form and submittal of plans/specifications will be required. Inquiries should be directed to me at the telephone number listed below, or at the address on this letterhead. Please refer to Transaction ID No. referred to in the regarding line when making reference to this correspondence. Sincerely, eroy G. sky, PS , Waste at r Specialist Integrate Services Bureau (715)726-2544 Voice 1jansky@commerce.state.wi.us f + REPORT Page of Wisconsin Department of Commerce SOIL EVALUATION "Division of Safety and Buildings accordance with Comm 85, Wis. Adm. Code in n ~ Cou ty Attach complete site plan on paper not less than 8 1/2 x 11 inches in size. Plan must include. but not limited to: vertical and horizontal reference point (BM), direction and Parcel I.D. percent slope, scale or dimensions, north arrow, and location and distance to nearest road. Please Date rint . 11„information. Reviewed by p Personal information you provide may be uses for sec*p►ArpRR~ roe P Owner p rty Lo i r W roPertY Govt. Lot 114 1/4 S TON R E (o d. or CSM# Property Owls Mailing Address ~ ~Lot # Block # Sub ` ❑ City ❑ Village Town Nearest Ro CtiY State + Zip Cod PhprtB N~R?4sr i t Code derived design flow rate GPD New Construction Us . Residential / Number of bedrooms ❑ Replacement ❑ Public or commercial - Describe: - Flood Plain elevation if applicable ~ ~ ~ ft• Parent material General comments /d l 41 ' pZ / and recommendations: Sys. rr'.l/eci~-Wv - ring Boring # in. Soil ication Rate 1 Pit Ground surface elev. 12 d/ft. Depth to limiting factor Texture Structure Consistence Boundary Roots GPD/ff Horizon Depth Dominant Color Redox Description 'Eff#1 'Eff#2 in. Munsell Qu. Sz. Cont. Color Gr. Sz. Sh. D /f/L ` y. G T_ tl~ i ring il lication Rate Boring # Ground surface elev. ft. Depth to limiting factor aBounlary _..Pit So Horizon Depth Dominant Color Redox Description Texture Structure Consistence Roots GPD/ff Gr. Sz. Sh. 'Eff#1 'Eff#2 in. Munsell Qu. Sz. Cost Color Z mss- C2 f i~' ~ Q • Effluent #1 = BOD > 30 < 220 mg/L and TSS >30:E 150 ' Effluent #2 = BOD < 30 mg/L and TSS < 30 mg/L CST Number CST Name (Please Print) S, ture 2T Bird Plumbing, Inc. Shaun Bird Telephone Number Date Evaluation Conducted Address -L-) -y 715-246-4516 1008 192nd Ave, New Richmond, WI 54017 e__ 17 _ / 1-5 1of Owner Parcel ID # Page 4- of Property Boring # onng n' Pit Ground surface elev. D Depth to limiting factor in icadon Rate 'Horizon Depth Dominant Color Redox Description Texture Structure Consistence Boundary Roots -E GPDM in. Munsell Qu. Sz. Cont. Color Gr. Sz. Sh. F71 Boring # Boring O Ground surface elev. ft. Depth to limiting factor in. Soil Application Rate Pit Horizon Depth Dominant Color Redox Description Texture structure consistence Boundary Roots GPDM In. Munsell Qu. Sz. Coat. Color Gr. Sz. Sh. -Eff#1 -Eff#2 0 MP, C - - 4," , 6 , Z1.7 k Boring # ❑ Boring Ground surface elev. ft. Depth to limiting factor In. ❑ Pit Soti Application Rate. Horizon Depth Dominant Col Redox Description. Texture Structure Consistence . Boundary Roots GPD/fP in. Munsell Qu. Sz. Cont. Color Gr. Sz. Sh. 'Eff#1 -EfF#2 Effluent #1 = BOD, > 30:S 220 mglL and TSS >30 1150 mglL - Effluent #2 = BOD, < 30 mgA- and TSS < 30 mglL The Department of Commerce is an equal opportunity service provider and employer. If you need assistance to access services or need material in an alternate format, please contact the department at 608-266-3151 or TTY 608-264-8777. 5004330 (a•6=) l " Soil Test Plot Plan' Project Name P.C. Collova Mrs. Inc. Sh ird Address P.O. Box 489 Somerset Wi 54025 TM #226900 Lot 15 Subdivision Farm View Ridge Date 5/8/04 NW 1/4 SE 1/4S 5 T 29 N/1317 W Township Hammond Boring 0 Well PL Property Line County ST. CROIX BM or'VRP Assume Elevation 100 ft. Top of Survey Iron System Elevation 104.2' *HRPSame as Benchmark Alternate Benchmark Top of 1/2" Pipe C 100.2' Scale is 1" = 40' unless otherwise noted 412' Property Line 101' 101.5' 102' B-2 2% Slo e ❑ B-3 B. M. AIt.B.M. B B - 1 ❑ - 319' Property Line ` SAFETY AND BUILDINGS DIVISION commerce.wi.gov Integrated Services Bureau 13 East Spruce Street Chippewa Falls, WI 54729 INSPECTION REPORT www,commerce.wi.gov/sb isconsin Deparbuent of Commerce Plumber Name and Address: Date of Inspection: June 9, 2005 Unknown Project Name: Collova JV/V Use: Residential ST ~0 Legal Description: NE-NW, SE, 5, 29, 17W p/ i Site Number: NA Certified Soil Tester Name and Ad ZONk~~ OF CO t Subdivision: Lots 5, 8, 9, and 13-15, Tom Nelson, CST 227387 Farmview Ridge 1432 120th Street Municipality: Town of Hammond New Richmond WI 54017 County: St. Croix Plan Transaction Number: NA Owner Name and Address: Sanitary Permit Number: NA P. C. Collova Builders PO Box 489 Wastewater Flow: 450 gpd Somerset WI 54025 Persons Present: T. Nelson An onsite soils verification was conducted at the above referenced site as per district policy for all sites with less than four inches of unsaturated soil below the bottom of the A horizon. The intent of this investigation is to confirm initial observations by the certified soil tester (CST) relating to the presence or absence of redoximorphic features in the A horizon and/or subsoil. In-situ soil texture, structure, and consistence factors were also reviewed as they relate to wastewater application rates. Other site conditions such as percent and direction of slope, landscape position, land surface contour length, and surface water hydrology may also be noted and their effects are factors considered in the recommendations and conclusions portion of this report. This investigation is the second one on these lots due to a change in certified soil testers and poor weather and lighting conditions on November 29, 2004, when the initial onsite investigation was completed. Lot 5 (A+2) 00-04" 10YR 3/2 sil, 2msbk, mfr, as. 04-07" 10YR 3/3 sil, 1 mpl, mfr, as. 07-09" 10YR 4/4 cl, 1 mpl, mfr, cw. 09-12 10YR 4/4 cl, 1 csbk, mfr, with f2f 10YR 5/6 rmfs. Lot 8-9 (A+0) 00-04" 10YR 3/2 sil, 2msbk, mfr, as. 04-08" 10YR 3/2 sil, 2msbk, mfr, as, with f1d 7.5YR 5/6 rmfs. 08-11" 10YR 4/4 scl, 2msbk, mfr, no rmfs. Lot 13 (A+0) 00-06" 10YR 2/2 sil, 2csbk, mfr, cw. 06-12" 10YR 4/3 cl, 2mpl, mfr, w/ c2f 10YR 5/6 and 6/3 rmfs. Lot 14 (A<0) Similar to Lot 15 below except the subsoil lacks redox features for 3-4 inches below the A horizon. Possible plow pan tension saturation might be expected since no redox were observed immediately below the A horizon. Lot 15 (A<0) 00-06" 7.5YR 2.5/2 sil, 2msbk, mfr, cw 06-11" 7.5YR 2.5/2 sil, 3msbk, mfr, as, w/f2d 7.5YR 5/6 rmfs. 11-15" 7.5YR 4/3 cl, 1 csbk, mfr, f2f 7.5YR 5/6 rmfs. Page 2 of 2 June 9, 2005 P.C. Collova Site Two other hand borings on Lot 15 revealed similar conditions. Redox features were observed in the A horizon and in the subsoil below. If mound systems are designed to overcome limitations of a high level of seasonal soil saturation and slow permeability, the linear loading rate should not exceed 4.5 gpd/ft and the basal wastewater application rated should not exceed 0.2 gpd/ftz. The additional basal area will partially compensate for the gentle land slope and prevent wastewater leakage at the mound toe. At least 30 inches of sand lift is recommended when applying septic tank effluent to the distribution cell of the mound to ensure proper treatment. The longest portion of the mound must be orientated along the contour. The mound shall be constructed to divert surface water around the mound structure as much as possible. In addition, an up slope drainage ditch should be considered if it is determined that surface or subsurface hydrology is improved by intercepting water and diverting it away from the mound site. Deep chisel plowing may be needed to improve the permeability where a plow pan appears to restrict downward water movement. Special Comments: - 1. The down slope toe of the proposed mound area on Lot 5 should be well clear of the drainage way. Soil conditions near the drainage way are very marginal for proper dispersal of effluent from a mound system immediately up slope. It is recommended that the proposed mound area be moved approximately 50 feet up slope. Property line boundaries would have to be reconfigured or an easement granted for placement of the mound on Lot 4. Soil tests would need to be redone to verify suitable conditions in the new area. 2. Even though I specified the maximum linear loading to be 4.5 gpd/ft, designers should try to design systems at 3.5 to 4.0 gpd/ft if possible. 3. Two soil borings in the proposed mound area on Lot 15 exhibited redox concentrations in the lower part of the A horizon and immediately below in the subsoil. This area is somewhat more level than other areas and more precipitation may infiltrate than on a sloping site. In addition, agricultural practices may have caused some compaction in the lower part of the A horizon and upper part of the B horizon. The combination of more infiltration and weak soil compaction may result in a higher level of saturation at this site than at other areas of the plat. Options include moving to another area on the lot, monitoring the area with observation pipes this next spring [see Comm 85.60(3) for requirements], or compiling a convincing explanation of why this is occurring and why its not a problem for proper system operation. If there are any questions regarding this report, please contact me. L My G. J sky, W ewater pecialist cc: ® County ❑ Plumber Ljansky@gommeroVstate.wi.us E-mail © CST ❑ Owner 715/726-2544 Voice 715/726-2549 Fax ❑ Other tX co. sots s~Qvt:Y acs E> FRSt~.~ s« r~ cr vy SyBsrQ ,4m Z. 4 J S JewccT Sct. S.woy 4. y-tye,mtu~►t 2. o s~epts 8 = l Mit J e 3 J-e"=- Sty L G R- t.pint! R Ti t 6 -3 % S to,PE.S V ~„IQ ~tLASA stir 2-°~o stojs Mx~ o_ c u'n 1 !u eB, - m . 161: I ~~A Ali o- y~ x ~ w _ 1 6 , y ]k, x W. ~ Fa&,~r`~. ^xa r 5c~ . PROW wzl SAFETY AND BUILDINGS DIVISION commerce.wl.gov Integrated Services Bureau 13 East Spruce Street C. ippewa Falls, WI 54729 INSPECTION REP cornrnerce.v i.gov/sb SEo 3 eo , isconsin (715) 726-2544 Departmerrt of commerce Date of Inspection: November 29, 2004 Plumber c~¢ Project Name: Collova Unkn Use: Residential Legal Description: NE-NW, SE, 5, 29, 17W Site Number: 692118 (Lot 5) Subdivision: Lots 5, 8, 9, and 13-15, Certified Soil Tester Name and Address: Farmview Ridge Shaun Bird CST 226900 Municipality: Town of Hammond 1008 192 Ave County: St. Croix New Richmond WI 54017 Plan Transaction Number: 1079283 (Lot 5) Owner Name and Address: Sanitary Permit Number: NA P. C. Collova Builders PO Box 489 Wastewater Flow: 450 gpd Somerset WI 54025 Persons Present: S. Bird, P. Quinn An onsite soils verification was conducted at the above referenced site as per district policy for all sites with less than four inches of unsaturated soil below the bottom of the A horizon. The intent of this investigation is to confirm initial observations by the certified soil tester (CST) relating to the presence or absence of redoximorphic features in the A horizon and/or subsoil. In-situ soil texture, structure, and consistence factors were also reviewed as they relate to wastewater application rates. Other site conditions such as percent and direction of slope, landscape position, land surface contour length, and surface water hydrology may also be noted and their effects are factors considered in the recommendations and conclusions portion of this report. Soil samples were taken from the approximate midpoint in the staked mound areas and reviewed under florescent fight at my office. Typical soil profiles could be described as follows: Lot 5 00-04" 10YR 3/2 sil, 2msbk, mfr, as. 04-07" 10YR 3/3 sil, 1 mpl, mfr, as. .07-09" 10YR 4/4 cl, 1 mpl, mfr, cw. 09-12 10YR 4/4 cl, 1 csbk, mfr, with f2f 10YR 5/6 rmfs. Lot 8-9 00-07" 10YR 3/2 sil, 2msbk, mfr, as. 07-10" 10YR 4/6 cl, 2msbk, mfr, as, with c3d 7.5YR 5/6 rmfs. 10-14" 7.5YR 4/6 scl, 2msbk, mfr, with c3f 7.5YR 5/6 rmfs. Lot 15 00-04" 10YR 3/2 sil, 2msbk, mfr, as. 04-07" 10YR 3/2 sil, 2f-mpl, mfr, as, with c2d 5YR 4/6 rmfs 07-12" 10YR 3/3 cl, 1csbk, mfi, c2d 7.5YR5/6 rmfs If a mound system is designed to overcome limitations of a high level of seasonal soil saturation and slow permeability, the linear loading rate should not exceed 4.5 gpd/ft and the basal wastewater application rated should not exceed 0.2 gpde. The additional basal area will partially compensate for the gentle land slope and prevent wastewater leakage at the mound toe. At least 30 inches of sand lift is recommended when applying septic tank effluent to the distribution cell of the mound to ensure proper treatment. The longest portion of the mound must be orientated along the contour. The mound shall be constructed to divert surface water around the mound structure as much as possible. In addition, an up slope drainage ditch should be considered if it is Page 2 of 2 November 29, 2004-r-- P.C. Collova,Site determined that-surface or subsurface hydrology is improved by intercepting water and diverting it away from the mound site. Special Comments: 1. The down slope toe of the proposed mound area on Lot 5 is very close to a drainage way. Soil conditions in this area- are very marginal for proper dispersal of effluent from a mound system immediately up slope. It is recommended that the proposed mound area be moved approximately 50 feet up slope. Property line boundaries would have to be reconfigured or an easement granted for placement of the mound on Lot 4. Soil tests would need to be redone to verify suitable conditions in the new area. 2. Even though I specified the maximum linear loading to be 4.5 gpd/ft, designers should try to design systems at 3.5 to 4.0 gpd/ft. 3. Two soil borings in the proposed mound area on Lot 15 exhibited redox concentrations in the lower part of the A horizon. This area is somewhat more level than other areas and more precipitation may infiltrate than on a sloping site. In addition, agricultural practices may have caused some compaction in the lower part of the A horizon and upper part of the, 6 horizon. The combination of more infiltration and weak soil compaction may result in a higher level of saturation at this site than at other areas of the plat. Options include moving.to another area on the lot, monitoring the area with observation pipes this next spring [see Comm 85.60(3) for requirements], or compiling a convincing explanation of why this is occurring and why it's not a problem for proper system operation. If there are any questions regarding this report, please contact me. ialist t cc: © County ❑ Plumber r.eroyy J ns cy, stews pec Ljansky mmer estate. i. s E-mail © CST ® Owner 7151726-2544 Voice 715/7 -2549 Fax ❑ Other I opoGone - i ne Web's 1 opograpnic map rago ui -#Q i4tl CaDy~tphl t9~9• Uk~pa ~ w ada We ~ ~ ~ . ~ ~ i /0651 j1OF LYI ,71! I 0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 km 0 0.09 0.18 0.27 0.36 0.45 mi Map center is UTM 15 542300E 4985948N (WGS84/NAD83) Jewett quadrangle M=0.713 Projection Is UTM Zone 15.NAD83 Datum G=0.38 http://www.topozone.com/print.asp?z=15&n=4985948.00014833&e=542300.000000003&... 12/1/2004 !Galt, SERBS ' ^ 1 146Z V x ' • cko tK co. Sp U SuavF,Y FO g FR6lh>r~ Q{- "Mvy S%SPOMI M 2-4 ri S1aq~~ APl'4 - 5c* -f- e" = M g JewReT S{~ slp&T #4 2.4 SNpL$ u-£ J e B Je1..sTr s{L Z- %-Ps s L c A- LAw~ R s{t a-3% S4fts V 4_ ~fLASAT~( s{l 2-47o S14 f 4 x x n I I 5". 'FOB It . ~f Y% ~ Y$ ~ r 4 i > iaP a yJ? ~ K s J t R ~ E k V ti k^ ;7. 4' T 9 y h ~t3 tv~p fir' ?4 ' ~ ~ _ ~ l~ a x x i:cR 10 Safety and Buildings ' 13 E. Spruce Street commerce.wl.gOV Chippewa Falls, WI 54729 www.commerce.wi.gov/sb/ Itisconsin www.wisconsin.gov Department of Commerce Jim Doyle, Governor Cory L. Nettles, Secretary November 16, 2004 CUST ID No. 226900 Fee Required $ 100.00 Fee Received $ 100.00 Balance Due $ 0.00 WiSMART code: 7633 SHAUN R BIRD BIRD PLUMBING, INC 1008 192 ND AVE NEW RICHMOND WI 54017 REQUEST FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION SITE: PC Collova Builders Town of Hammond, St Croix County S 1/2, NE 1/4, S5, T29N, R17W Identification Numbers Lo : 15 ubdivision: Farmview Ridge Transaction ID No. 1079441 - ylt&j Site ID No. 692155 ©6 FOR: Object Type: Soil Saturation Determination Please refer to both identification Regulated Object ID No.: 991565 numbers, above, in all correspondence I with the agency. V" The submittal described above has been placed on HOLD and the review and approval is pending subject to receipt of the ADDITIONAL INFORMATION and/or revised plans requested by this letter. Upon receipt of the additional information and/or revised plans, the plans will be reviewed for compliance to applicable Wisconsin Administrative Codes and Wisconsin Statutes. The following must be corrected/revised and accompany the resubmittal: 1. The Interpretative Determination report does not adequately show that this lot has at least 6 inches of suitable soil for a mound system. The narrative has a number of discrepancies, errors, omissions, and inconsistencies that need to be addressed prior to approval. The submitted may want to consider engaging a licensed professional soil scientist to help with submittal of the revised report. See comments on the report submitted under Transaction Number 1079283 for further explanation. 2. It would be very helpful to have a full-size copy of both the preliminary and final plat maps for this subdivision. SHAUN R BIRD Page 2 11/16/2004 3. Submit three (3) properly sealed, legible, and permanent copies of all revised documents for review. Send your resubmittal into the address listed above, unless otherwise noted, and the department will review the resubmittal within 5 working days of receipt date. Please include a copy of this letter with your resubmittal. If you have any questions, after reading the above comments and related code sections cited, please call me at the telephone number below. If the above requested information and/or plans are not received within 30 business days of the date of this correspondence, this submittal will be returned denied. No fees will be refunded, and a new fee, application form, and submittal of plans/specifications will be required should you desire to continue with this project. The code in effect at the time of new submittal would apply. Sincerely, Leroy G. Jansky, RPSS, Wastewater Specialist Integrated Services Bureau (715) 726-2544 Voice (715) 726-2549 Fax Ijansky@commerce.state.wi.us cc: PC Collova Builders Inc Zoning Office St Croix County SPIA a 01 CY) C4 I H < ` \ \ M 00 N I° -00 LL I n Of N 0 tip'`' ~IO~\6s\\ \`o N N O a M \ z o yoj 61 , ~c, \ r \ \ i N • 8\ \ / / /h1 ^ N00'34'59"W z 125.06 o 9 \ i OSO - - - ° U- 10 So0'34'59"E o tO W ti / o,~ Zs -u- IZ /o,/ / 0 \ 125.39' f °D 1 O,OM p l oo L4 M in I, I N Q MI I o ~W! M N W L: c., CD IR (A 3 .i / An 1 r, ioI 0~p ao IN .~0'L99 M "£0,90.00 S 0~ • 1 0 \ ~ \ ~ v~ ( tO ^ . ~ F 03 J ,09'Zll .9LI,LZ ,LZ,9 oa~m~~bSrc ~ Zg1.05 L3 M / I I LO N~\ 174.53' N 0 131" W 435.58' to V) < so NI I I ~I M M M \ N\ N 65 " W 252. V, NI N rn 03 N ur) N i-' N 07'21'31 -1CO o 74 bN cn\Z o M n I co I L N'29'46" W 373.81' J LoI N co ~CL.2 It \ LL 00 co Ct) & (0 C) vi d \ 0 I ry tc) A e I 0 4: O~ / t!1 Z N \ zl I io v' a r N / $ / , v I ,o 3 ..61,800 'ao Z 10 N O ylA / / F41 Nrl 00 I PI) 3 _ / tO al 0) Go 1: lo, 00 L) N \NZ`\?\~ I L N 00.13' eC, 393.82'- L25 N 07'06'11" E 372.29' a aI \ LL: z 10, •9(\ 2~l to < N N /cp 000 r--: LO wo (D eAl y ~~j' 26. C-4 '4 O via 3 u ai \ `n\\ \ ro o r vi LL: IN re) tr) to n r ti N~ 3 N< W o< rM mN I L le) rl 1: to 2/ l z r£a - L << oa ss £9z - - "V9 ,09Z 3 " N S0N`dl 0311V1dNf1 -HINON