HomeMy WebLinkAbout018-2001-01-000 (3)
Wisconsin Department of Commerce SOILEE1VARATI N REPORT Page of-
Division of Safety and Buildings ~~~v
in ac anod~IBUC 4"9152kv~uu ~'){~Ad.. ode
CO1nly
T, t
Attach complete site plan on paper not less th n 8 1/ 1 os in size. Plan m t
include, but not limited to: vertical and horizon I rete ~ M on Parcel I. a
percent slope. scale or dimensions. north arc I>ll~~ to nea t road. ~l v-~lJ
Please print aft Information. Revle ed b _ (D/ace 2
Persona! information you provide maybe used for secondary purposes (Privacy Lew. s. 15.04 (1) (m)).
Property Owner Property Location
R NV 1/4 iJf114 S ►`f T Zq N R )7 w
Property Owner's Malling Address Lot # Block # Subd. Name or CSM#
{ 1 i W, DNJ 1S1 OA1 ST . , OI.ST { D(o~ ~r Yf~'E S
City Slate Zip Code Phone Number ❑ City ❑ Village X Town Nearest Road
FALL- -,.,I Syoz (-715 42b-48o Nit AAU erA E
New Construction User Residential ! Number of bedrooms Code derived design flow rate , WDO GPD
❑ Replacement ❑ Public or commercial - Describe: _
Parent material _ Ra s5LL- Flood Main elevation if applicable
General comments
and recommendations: Ar f KACkE 545TEM 0.6 L4DAOtAJo;- RATE
n Bodes # Boxing
Kj Pit Ground surface elev. _ q{~~]~ ft. Depth to limiting factor ~,G10 in Sad Application Rate
Horizon Depth Dominant Color Redox Description Toxture Structure Consistence Boundary Roots GP
in. Munsefi Ou. Sz Cont. Color Gr. Sz. Sh. 'Eff#1 '01102
z 10451 A-M*6, ds as 2, , 0.5 0.
3 1_5 4 le 3 5 0 1- 0. .2 n-CA t
Boring # Boring )
Pit Ground surface elev. _ q4 L _ H. Depth to Urniting factor In. Soil pce ,Rate
Horizon Depth Dominant Color Radox Description Texture Structure Consistence Boundary Roots GPD1W
In. Munsell Clu. Sz. Cont. Color Gr. Sz. Sh. 'EH#1 'E)T#2
l 0-1l z L -L dS 40 Jf 0.5 O,S
z- I -Z-q o 511 z r -+n 0.8'
3 3 s) 4r as . 0.44 0.10
L
q -;5_3-46 11!51 3 s 0 ml as IV 0,77 -
5 trio -7.s 3 S j} rn - a- z
Efluent #1 = BOO > 30 < 220 mg/L and TSS >30 < 150 mg/L ' Effluent #2 - BOD < 30 mg/L and TSS < 30 rngfL
CST Name (Please PrW) gnature CST Number
_/f)AR,j 14 H ~t_ STf=- 2Z I 1: 3Z
Address Dd% Evaluation Conducted Telephone Number
W9175 6gC''\AVe, VF.A,FAU.s,W1 5402Z -OZ 1%S L42.6-1_1 7,5
3
1 > pr~.l OwG Pa.
Sy t_ - -
Property owner LA Parcel ID If
# ❑ Boring
p Pit Ground surface elev. h. Depth to IimitlN factor in.
Texture Structure Consistence GPDrtf
Horizon Depth O Redoz Desctiptlon •E1f#1 'Eff#2
ftIftQW_S L Cont. Color Gt. Sz. Sh.
In. MunseM
SAM -10 -Sq. -Tz-"
Boring # E] Boring
p, it Ground surface elev. _ WA (L. ft. Depth to li niting factor ►n. Sop Application Rate
Roots Gf~f
Horizon Depth Dominant Coll Redox Description Texture Structure Consistence Boundary In. Munsefl au. Sz. Cont. Color
Gr. Sz. Sh. 'EtM11 'Eff#2
-ID Rz~2 L Z~'mab ~'S
Z 10-1 OY~t~2 ' L F~ +rrt b ,t-1
_L_ _225
8 - 511 2 -m rYtFr C5 2~ .5 0•
24 10yR46
5 Z - 04R 3 - SG) ~ ms1oK m r Q.5 -rrrl t7,4
s! r sbi{ MI 0.0 kIA_ ► 0, 0.
2t[- 7.3 R 3
s9r. .rt a~ o.~ t.z
32-3L IoYrC s/t• - •11t qia -
$ 3 ovttS ~n~ 0.17 I.L
~I3-sG Of Bor~tlr+g to r a `+/b s 0s9
Boring # ft. Depth to limiting factor in.
pit Ground surface elev. Soil Application Rate
Horizon Damfnant Coles Redox Description Texture Structure Consistence Boundary Roots GPDM
tlr 'EMI 'E
in. MurnseN Ou. Sz. Cont. Color Gr. Sz. Sh.
1 L A-MAK fr t V, We ZSb 2v(- 0.5 0.
y WI ;1 r 5 - .5 o f
3 14-14 love 3 f w
1~-rnabl~ S _m O.Z Or
4 4-20 3 y
r, 7r! 1~ , 1
20_2J6 X413 to 10 Z-4 -In 0-1 MAr 1
3 y 15 im K rrt J f r 2V -fi O 1. 2
yl.-3? Vtt 5
• Effluent #2 = BOD, ^ and TSS 130 nVYL
uent #t = BOD, > 30:s 220 mgrl and TSS >30 1151) mglL
The Department of Commerce is an equal opportunity service provider and employer. If you need assistance to access services or
need material in an alternate format, please contact the department at 608-266-3151 or TTY 608-264-8777.
sau•uwla.traol
l
n-OrPLAN
S J LLA MARY-
s TOP or-pvc Pike
it. I N~ E =
2 .
S?. C CO \S 5
vie
w LoT I
Z
J
IV
o Q ~~b y41 -
ur _ q7
17:
~L
ST. CROIX COUNTY
,i WISCONSIN
PLANNING & ZONING DEPT.
/ / M / / u / M ■ r~r~r ST. CROIX COUNTY GOVERNMENT CENTER
1101 Carmichael Road
Hudson, WI 54016-7710
r
" (715) 386-4680 FAX (715) 386-4684
April 25, 2005
Ms. Mary ]o Hollister, CST #224832
Hollister's Soil Testing
W9875 690"' Ave.
River Falls, WI 54022
Re: Revisions for Soil Evaluation Reports - Forest Ridge Estates, Hammond Twp.
Dear Ms. Hollister:
On April 21st I performed on-site verifications of data reported for lots 27, 28, 29 and 30 to determine
the cause of discrepancies between the engineer's preliminary plat elevations and those on the soil
reports. There was an error in your method for calculating the benchmark elevations in relation to mean
sea level contours, which resulted in the contours not matching the elevations described for soil borings
and test pits. While on the site, I walked all four lots and found that some of the distances between test
pits and hand borings did not match measurements represented the scale used for their associated plot
plans. In order for mound systems to be designed, corrections need to be made.
To summarize my findings:
1. All lots whose reports used mean sea level elevations need to be revised so that the benchmarks
are based on an assumed 100.0 ft elevation. This will require using your field notes and,
starting with every BM #1, add the back-sight rod reading to 100'to give a new height of
instrument. Then re-calculate (subtract from HI) all the foresight rod readings to obtain test pit
and/or boring elevations related to the BM #1 and draw u nevv~plot plans to correspond with
the new contours. Lots reported using mean sea level ere 1, , 3, 4, 6, 8, 10, 17, 21, 24, 26,
27, 28, and 29.
2. Do not exclude any previously reported test pits. They must be included in revised evaluations
and shown on the plot plans. This will help avoid confusion when locations for mound contours
are being established. The distances between test pits within tested areas need to be updated
from the original 2002 plot plans.
3. Original signed and dated revised reports must be submitted to our office so that they can be
attached to the previous submittals to track changes made.
4. I evaluated a hand boring on lot 28 that was next to a test pit that had been marked with a lathe
labeled "29A" (from the original lot numbering). It was approx. 95' southwest of the corner
benchmarks and 20 ft. west of the test pit you now show as "A". The original site was an
excavated pit, not a hand boring, as evidenced by backfill. Regardless, both test pits were
Hollister - Page 2
described as having redox features within 3 inches of the A-horizon. I found mottling in the
sample I examined just below the A-horizon boundary, so am requiring that any mound design
be restricted to the northerly test pits B, C, and E.
5. Based on the soil evaluation for lot 28, all four lots fronting on Cty. Rd. E appear to have serious
limitations for POWTS installation other than the tested areas already documented. This means
that gany damage to existing tested areas may eliminate the possibility of POWTS installation,
unless an A+0" mound design is approved by the Dept. of Commerce after the requisite on-site
evaluation by Leroy Jansky. I will send a copy of this letter to the current owner of the lot to
forewarn him of this situation. Would you please re-establish the marking tape to indicate the
locations of these areas, since you are more familiar with the terrain?
Sanitary permits cannot be issued for the lots referenced above until the soil reports in question have
been corrected and/or completed.
If you have any questions regarding the above requested changes and/or additions to the soil reports,
please feel free to contact me at the Zoning office number and schedule a meeting to discuss the soil
data for Forest Ridge Estates.
Sin
c
Pamela Quinn, qCST665054
Zoning Specialist
Cc: Mark Sylla, Developer
Kernon Bast, Edina Realty
Leroy Jansky, Dept. of Commerce POWTS Wastewater Specialist
Subdivision file
Xu ~ 1151
UNPLATTED LANDS45.8 x
;3 3'33"E\, /f x 1145.6 ZONED AG.-RESIDENTIAL NORTH ONE OF /fHE NW 1
0
w
J( 1147 7
-E We-
SECTION/ I w 288.84' o 29 o
J, R17W, / 11 o / o ~~T
i" COUNTY p ~
AS / o ~ \ EA F- --v
I ,
NT 4.o - - - - rn 2.23 A\C.
/ N.B. 51308 S.F.L~ \
7~
N.B. 1.17 AC.
1142.2 1
x I _ \
\ x
I 1 E - 11 46.5N
I
1146.8
I
-MT 2
l~V/ I
„ 121097
I
x 2.78 A(
B. 53993
,O N1 645.24
1143.1 i t 89'53'22"
W ~LFE _ 1148.5
q Z Ito
I
X _
1141.3 I _ -
I _
1
.23
\ ~ LOTX i ~
.3 ~ 61
11 5 ~
7.1 Y) 2929I8-S.F. \ / S \1149.5
/ 6 72 Ac.
LFE 11,44.00' N.B.\\51636 S.F. ~ 3s
` m W/ I N.B. ~3 48 Aid
X \ F \
r- 0
~j - - N 5,' --E/! - f • \
I N
ICI /Z --/--)---1g3 \
Im rn SSA \ 3.
m Ti
I n LFE = 1144.00' I- i m / i 2170 7 SF.
D l rn rv 41 8 A Ck /
m 14 to 1143.3 x
1 N Iw
- I UNPJ.ATIEDLANO1
I- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
~tp NORTH LINE OF THE-NW-I/-4--. N 89!38 '33" 1178.88' Sr.QU ' TfigSr IGH1fAY E
mmr~ N 89'52'22" E 1178.85' N89'
-
ts' - ---192.56' 170.00'--.
365.52' 148.
ss a I I I~ 95.90'
N 288.85' Z
N p I I ~ O p~ -
O
- _ - - N -
LOT 28 s .oo'
.s 8 -
~ I l 9
~cE - 8226 „4e: so -F. - r -m ns~
.I n
2.25 Ac. -
s' I I
I ' I \ \ ti / I I LOT 29 I LOT 30$1 8
11118933 S. F. 1( H137528 S. F I r
I
\ \ i / I Iz 2.73 Ac. I 1 3.16 Ac.
1 w , \ \ / LOT 27 I IN LFE _ nso.so' 1 18 VE 11"4 OW 1 R.A.
x ! 130024 S.F. $ N 89
S d \ti44.50' 2.98 Ac. I IN 11~ 1
LFE - 114t1.i I I' I I m L - -
MWE 1fe
1y~ _
00
' 114200' \ 3 89'53'22" W HWE - 1 / -
\ \83.86' j
1144.50'
LOT 1 at
\ \ s
294113 S.F. \ \ \ s II
6.75 Ac. \ \ \ 254.23' 22150' 318.50'
VE - 1144.W
\ \ N 89 38'33" E 796.23'
F{, 4 \ \ C\ \ \ M 64'IY'49_ E 400.13
\ 2 ! \
- - N 89'59'06" E 634.03' LOT 26
1~ N Y090'00- E
N ,ottsit' \ \
\ I '6'e• 251982 S. F.
m s \ \ 5.78 Ac.
lFE - t,as oo'
LOT 2 \ \
rn .4 N~ 217087 S.F.
M 4.98 Ac.
7 N 1FE _ 1144.00' 1 1---------------------
' S 8si'""5r W 480.78' TO
o; S 8920'18" W 780.60' - - - - - - J ~j 4 N 8938'57' E 479.22'
- - - - - - - - - -
i r---