HomeMy WebLinkAbout018-2001-21-000
0'
Wisconsin Oe arVnen~tti IL EVALUATION REPORT Page-L_of~
C7t4jNG0FF'CE
Division of Sa sty and dance with Comm 85, Wis. Adm. Code County l
Attach comptole site plan on paper not less than 8 1/2 x 11 Inches In size. Plan must rl
include, but not limited lo: vertical and horizontal reference point (BM), direction and Parcel I.D. D1 i - 1 -Q6D
percent slope, scale or dimensions. north arrow, and location and distance to nearest road.
Please print all Information. Re Date
Peraonei informeoon you provide may be used for secondary purposes (Privacy Law, e. 15.04 (1) (m)). 3J (J S
Property Owner - „ Property Location
1/4 ~ild S I~ T -.2q N R 17 W
-r.-4 LM CC r
Property Owners Mailing Address - Lot 2A lock # Subd. Name or CSM#
111 -4 W o-01 S1 5M ST . - F-966.1- #Z11W EStJ!`f
City State ZIP Code Phone Number ❑ City ❑ Village X Town Nearest Road
AWeR FALLS WI: 5402-(115 4Z (6-48o N AAA e•Tlf E
New Construction User Residential /Number of bedrooms _q_ Code derived design flow rate _ (.0 0 GPD
❑ Replacement ❑ Public or commercial - Describe:
Parent material ALL 0 W Flood Wain elevation it applicable / t! + tt•
General comments
and recomrnendatlons: /M01lNU SVS"~IEM 1,(o7 5AJQ0 V I -L s.X~ A~Gf'G~%1/1/ B/1'I s t.~►
0.5 LGADW & "Tf, Qe , S
Boring # El Boring
ya; Pit Ground surface elev. ag 11. Depth to limiting factor ZZ in.
Soil Application Rate
Horizon Depth Dominant Color Redox Description Torture Structure Consistence Boundary Roots GPD#i
in. Munsell Qu. Sz- Cont. Color Gr. Sz_ Sh. 'Eff#t 'Eff#2
0-3 044 3 m r MAC 00 3 015 IDS
Z 3-1 ~i - ' st l r a CID --3 tF~r & .5 0.
8-IZ J mfr C-10 - 4-eQ 8.5 S
5 zz- fa 3 s( m dh 0.3 0.5
tgwa n1 t c&acts; i-to s 1.s ozrp-r-ot ELv' a.
Boring # El Boring
5-al Pit Ground surface elev. _j 0 Z, -)q ft. Depth to limiting factor _ zz In. Spit Ilion Rate
Horizon Depth Dominant color Redox Description Texture Structure Consistence Boundary Roots GPDIff'
In. Munsell Qu. Sz. Cont. Color Gr. Sz. Sh. 'Eff#l 'Eff#2
t Q-9 IDY44) -m a.b a.~
2 p y 4 y 5 -L C.S 0•~
3 ! -t ~{p41( - Sit Z -Lab ter' 0-b Zi-M .5 Br
)q-7Z ti 4 5 -L b Zv~-cb S 0.
u-3 104 R5 Gzd -J~ Ls . N\ dh 61m <<E 0.
SaMI: 6P-
cta a
Ef ant #1 = BOO > 30 220 ntg/t. and TSS >30 < 150 mg/L ' Effluent 02 - 800, 5 30 mgA- and TSS < 30 mgfl.
CST Name (Please Print? aturs . CST Number
-A)AR,j 10 H L STF- A ZZ 3Z
Address Date Evalue0on Conducted Telephl:= NW W
W9fl15 69o{hAve, yE FALLs WT 54o2Z 0$-05-62 -715 y2b-1"175
Rti~~ SAD : d9-1£r oz
FL UPDATED . py 2*-05"
,~l 3
.
cLem Page of
Property pwner ►=S~ U AN Paroe110 f1
Boring '
0. Depth to limiting factor icatlon Rate
4 so # Ground surface elev.
1 Texture Structure Consist ndary Roots GPDAT
Depth Dominant C Redox Description 'Effff t '092
Gr. Sz. Sh.
Sz. Cont. Color
In. Munsell
1 4-8 [ e Z z - L Z~r ~ Fir' -t . ` O t
lS d5 5 Z~ -co
3 14-Z{ IQ ~3 - rnsbl< v~rr C 5
4 21-50 to" _k4 - - ~ 1, z
S Kl
5 o-6q lovlR
1040 E
P 4q Boring Boring Ground surface elev. r~YJ tt• Depth to Ilmitbtg factor ` In. Sol tlon Rate
structure Consistence . Boundary Roots GPO/tF
nt Cot Redox Description Texture -E~1 'Eff#2
Horizon Oath pomma
Hon Gr. Sz. Sh.
In Munsel Ou. Sz. Cont. Color
-m m.t r 0,5 a
L
1 U-~ toVtci~2
1l ?.~-r+1 r aS 3 ~-co ors 0~
S
Z - tpYtt
0
l8 v+c~ o ti ` +.h stl z~a1bK fr 4~ - 0.5 A-
{1,- 3
4 0.
01te-44 r Cw 2v -ca . s
~t t. ~ 1 Z~ablt -F 1Y
, ovt~y o ~ rt
0.4
V ►r►3 -f: .5 Y\ m~ r
Boring in.
8ori e~1 Gro ace elev. ft Depth to limiting factor Soil kadon Rye
zo) ICJ pit
Texture structure s'istence Boundary Roots GPD f
Hod Dep Dominant Color Redox 'EPfgi 'Etfff2
in. Munsel Go. Sz. Cont Gr S
r ~ 34-co .5
t 0-4 y ~t L 7_,1 4,5
Z Q-f~ o ~Z -mom
►1 Sb rtrtt;r 2-41-rn .S O.Q
3 ! - tovtt4/3 Z~C-rh
7. 3Jq S M M~~
28'-
F vJ o NE s3
(1.10f tZ 5'1RaS1F 5
I
I
Effluent 82 = 600, ^ 30 mgfL end TSS 30 mglL
' Effluent p1 = BOD,> 30 1220 m9n-aril TSS >30 ~ 150 mg/_
The Department of Commerce is an equal opport lea eSer contact the epand employer. I G-l t S teed assistance t 264o services or
please
need material in an alternate format,
Sao-13)0(8 /N01
I
I
M,.V 1 PLA V 3
aMtL'R 5 LUA f_ / '
~t - -
S 2- of 5 iKE '
Q
GFZ
ti9*
T QAi
oRTtt ~u~zrr u~Ea
L-O.-z i
r~
a)
J
O '
,12~ ` gq,60
q%O %
~p .
Hwy,-tR' 8O .
. pP
ST. CROIX COUNTY
WISCONSIN
PLANNING & ZONING DEPT.
t M / N N M ■ rrrrr_ ST. CROIX COUNTY GOVERNMENT CENTER
1101 Carmichael Road
Am• Hudson, WI 54016-7710
(715) 386-4680 FAX (715) 386-4684
April 25, 2005
Ms. Mary ]o Hollister, CST #224832
Hollister's Soil Testing
W9875 690"' Ave.
River Falls, WI 54022
Re: Revisions for Soil Evaluation Reports - Forest Ridge Estates, Hammond Twp.
Dear Ms. Hollister:
On April 21st I performed on-site verifications of data reported for lots 27, 28, 29 and 30 to determine
the cause of discrepancies between the engineer's preliminary plat elevations and those on the soil
reports. There was an error in your method for calculating the benchmark elevations in relation to mean
sea level contours, which resulted in the contours not matching the elevations described for soil borings
and test pits. While on the site, I walked all four lots and found that some of the distances between test
pits and hand borings did not match measurements represented the scale used for their associated plot
plans. In order for mound systems to be designed, corrections need to be made.
To summarize my findings:
1. All lots whose reports used mean sea level elevations need to be revised so that the benchmarks
are based on an assumed 100.0 ft elevation. This will require using your field notes and,
starting with every BM #1, add the back-sight rod reading to 100'to give a new height of
instrument. Then re-calculate (subtract from HI) all the foresight rod readings to obtain test pit
and/or boring elevations related to the BM #1 and draw up new plot plans to corre nd with
the new contours. Lots reported using mean sea level were 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, 10, 17 2 241 26,
27, 28, and 29.
2. Do not exclude any previously reported test pits. They must be included in revised evaluations
and shown on the plot plans. This will help avoid confusion when locations for mound contours
are being established. The distances between test pits within tested areas need to be updated
from the original 2002 plot plans.
3. Original signed and dated revised reports must be submitted to our office so that they can be
attached to the previous submittals to track changes made.
4. I evaluated a hand boring on lot 28 that was next to a test pit that had been marked with a lathe
labeled "29A" (from the original lot numbering). It was approx. 95' southwest of the corner
benchmarks and 20 ft. west of the test pit you now show as "A". The original site was an
excavated pit, not a hand boring, as evidenced by backfill. Regardless, both test pits were
Hollister - Page 2
described as having redox features within 3 inches of the A-horizon. I found mottling in the
sample I examined just below the A-horizon boundary, so am requiring that any mound design
be restricted to the northerly test pits B, C, and E.
5. Based on the soil evaluation for lot 28, all four lots fronting on Cty. Rd. E appear to have serious
limitations for POWTS installation other than the tested areas already documented. This means
that ___y damage to existing tested areas may eliminate the possibility of POWTS installation,
unless an A+0" mound design is approved by the Dept. of Commerce after the requisite on-site
evaluation by Leroy Jansky. I will send a copy of this letter to the current owner of the lot to
forewarn him of this situation. Would you please re-establish the marking tape to indicate the
locations of these areas, since you are more familiar with the terrain?
Sanitary permits cannot be issued for the lots referenced above until the soil reports in question have
been corrected and/or completed.
If you have any questions regarding the above requested changes and/or additions to the soil reports,
please feel free to contact me at the Zoning office number and schedule a meeting to discuss the soil
data for Forest Ridge Estates.
Sin
c
Pamela Quinn, qCST665054
Zoning Specialist
Cc: Mark Sylla, Developer
Kernon Bast, Edina Realty
Leroy Jansky, Dept. of Commerce POWTS Wastewater Specialist
Subdivision file
Parcel 018-2001-21-000 06/30/2010 12:01 PM
PAGE 1 OF 7
Alt. Parcel 14.29.17.885 018 - TOWN OF HAMMOND
Current ❑ ST. CROIX COUNTY, WISCONSIN
Creation Date Historical Date Map # Sales Area Application # Permit # Permit Type # of Units
00 0
Tax Address: Owner(s): O = Current Owner, C = Current Co-Owner
0 - SNEGOSKY, ADAM J
ADAM J SNEGOSKY C - HETFELD, MEGAN E
MEGAN E HETFELD
1185 BROADWAY ST
HAMMOND WI 54015
Districts: SC = School SP = Special Property Address(es): Primary
Type Dist # Description ' 957 193RD ST
SC 2422 ST CROIX CENTRAL
SP 1700 WITC
Legal Description: Acres: 2.490 Plat: 09-046-FOREST RIDGE ESTATES 1/30 018-03
SEC 14 T29N R17W PT NW NW FOREST RIDGE Block/Condo Bldg: LOT 21
ESTATES LOT 21 (2.490AC) Tract(s): (Sec-Twn-Rng 40 1/4 160 1/4)
14-29N-17W NW NW
Notes: Parcel History:
Date Doc # Vol/Page Type
02/08/2007 844153 TD
02/07/2003 708637 2134/101 QC
01/29/2003 707467 2124/147 WD
01/14/2003 705829 9/46 PLAT
2010 SUMMARY Bill Fair Market Value: Assessed with:
0
Valuations: Last Changed: 11/04/2008
Description Class Acres Land Improve Total State Reason
RESIDENTIAL G1 2.490 63,800 0 63,800 NO
Totals for 2010:
General Property 2.490 63,800 0 63,800
Woodland 0.000 0 0
Totals for 2009:
General Property 2.490 63,800 0 63,800
Woodland 0.000 0 0
Lottery Credit: Claim Count: 0 Certification Date: Batch
Specials:
User Special Code Category Amount
Special Assessments Special Charges Delinquent Charges
Total 0.00 0.00 0.00