HomeMy WebLinkAbout018-2001-26-000
ti
3
MAY 0 2 2005 IL EVALUATION REPORT Page of
WisoDnsin Department o merce
DIvWon of Safety and dings$ . CROI
zpNIN ~pfgce Comm 85. Whs. Adm. Code
O County FFJC _
Attach complete site plan on paper rot 112 x t Inches in site. Plan must
include. but not limited to: vertical end hortzontai rst point (BM), direction and Parcel I.D.
percent stops. scale or dimensions. north off ow. and location and distance to nearest road, Date
Re wed by
please print all Information.
Persons, inronnatbn you provide may, be used nor secondary purposes (Privacy Lew. 4. IS.e4 (1) (m)).
Property Owner Property Location 1 *Aj ~ 1/4 A{WV4 S !`t T 2R N R ~7 W
d. Name or CSM#
Properly0wrmWs Malting Address of # nAW
I I I L1 U), 00 vst W sr r Flo KIR5T- sZrDc.E L5TA'WS
City Slate Z1p Code Phone Number City M Town Nearest Road
AWC-A FALL-- WI 5`10" (lss 42-to-1480 IHI1 LTif E
tion User Residential / Number of bedrooms _--q____ Code derived design flow rate (Poo GPD
New Construc
❑ Replacement ❑ Public or commercial - Describe: d
Parent material --r•1/ otk-C&6fA. 11 Flood Wain elevation if applicable N`A'---
General
ecommendations: 5V51-Too• 1.14 SAAzi Fit-L-
0.5 LOA014& RATE .Oct
cOtu~y• oN SitEi/3~r,~ 7 ~jnlJf/ r~-~~~ 6~
Boring
Bo
1 ' t 1 dN # p; Pit Ground surface elev.Q,~` (t. Depth to limiting (actor in Soil Rate
Horizon Depth Dominant Color Redox Description Toxture St xtm Consistence Boundary Roots G
in. Munsell Qu. Sz. Cont. Color Gr. Sz. Sh. 'Eft01 'Elf#2
o-'f o t_4 ( - it 1 r ~ s ~f 0.5 0.
Z St _ dsk a--3 8.5S 0$
1b-Z2. o y 4`51 Zm s CL's Q•S 6-%-
4 1-Z3 0 4 u bl Jn-k Q J -r9D o. z 0.5
5 -210 0 ~{t24 o s2. 1 9b) dsh Z 0.2- 0.5
zo 2 PR S 1r0 F-M a-VS.
ELI Bolirv # 0 Boring ft. Daps, to rmning radon In. Pit Ground surfrce elev.. Sol
Horizon Depth Dominant Color Redox Description ' Texture Structure Consistence Boundary Roots GPDflP
In.- Munuell Qu. Sz. Cant. Color Gr. Sz. Sh. 'Eff#l 'Eff#2
0-3 10'40,zi << r 3tr{' 0.5 0.
O•S 0.~
eI -co
0.5
4 1q- p 4 ,L I st{ --jnLSbK-ASb~-
-inedq N S1 M M-3 bK QS J- r L A 3
EBkront #1 = SOD > 30:S 220 m®fL and TSS >30 < 150 mg/L ' Effluent #2 800< 30 ng& and TSS 30 `Q&
CST Name (Please P") signature CST Number
MA JO H t-t_ STS 2Z B7-
Address Date Evalilaoon Telephone Number
W9t75 690+~AVa:, UE. FAU-S WT 544022 D -01-02- 142.6-\-17S
04-~-os
P~
T
C wx - 0+~) Page of
prop" Owner Parcel tD p
t' ~i ng a Poring Ground surface elev. ,4 tt Depth to I'aniting factor in. Sob Rate
7Yr Roots GPD/If
Cord. Color Gr. SL Sh.
in. Qu. SL
Horizon Depth 9:bW'1tZZV Redox Description Texture Structure Consistence Boundary *Eff#1 '002
s -co
1 0-S 3 0Z- L zf obK r .5 34-to 0 '!5
~ - O t •3
7- f-C .Z 0.3
0,3
d►S 5 ~e I1tt ~S•
G ❑
B
LU-T oling ~ ~ Pit Boring Ground surface olev. ft. Depth to UrN*V 18CW In. Shc Rate
GPDMt
Horizo Dominant Redox Description Texture Structure Consistence Boundary Roots Rift
902
MunseU au. Sz. Cont. Color Gr. Sz. Sh.
Ass- ~`4 Rt zo .
• eplh to Umlting facto In. Rate
H Boling N Boling Ground surface elev. n
eL74 S ,-)R Pit GPOR
Horizon Depth Dominant Color Radon Oesal Texture a Cotsistence Boundary Roots
plion •E11#1 'EItN2
in. Muns all Ou. SL COnt Gr. h.
1 0_1 AYQ~2 1i v 3~t~-co •5 0.
2 B--IS IovR it M a5 z*(-CA ors
3 19,-11 Q L4 1` o i 1 (-Co
y -Zz ~ ti tovpct. 1 I~abK 1v Z-
Z-i7 o ti rc~l Cl 0A0 UAD
Z
• Effluent a1 - BOD, > 30 < 220 mWL. and TSS >30 < 150 mgA- ' EM MM p2 = BOO, 130 nvyL and TSS < 30 mgA-
The Department of Commerce is an equal opportunity service provider and employer. if you need assistance to access services or
need material in an alternate format, please contact the department at 608-266-3151 or TTY 608-264-8777.
avu•A330 (x moo)
IPIL-Or PLAN
~9;4Ad I
TaL
;ffKE
,sr-re ix eoMA;TV., IN, ft10CP~1~5
0106 tv,
b
40 vk
- N
~(`SaurN P~eoPeaY u NHS
i
i
o
w
1 a 0
w-A.23' 3. 318.50'
N 2~
Ile
\1149.5 1 1 1149.6 X,., / 115.3
x
LFE,/ = 1153.00 ~
1157.~1d ~
• 1 L®T/ MX IcoI4
s\ 1 - 25198 S. F. i Im
\ 3.~ 1
1 \ X „52.7 5.781 Ac. / z
\ N.B. 206070 S.F. 1 1 =
N B. 4.73 Ac.// I I K
V) I(A
\ 1154.7 L - T cC J Iz
rn. \ 1 \ x \ \ \ Fr ` --A
I 115 .8=
~,,I 89'38'57" E-A&A W7
_ i
1 J _ - "(n I
2' fT
1 w 7V 8938}57` E 479.2 N IC
z "u
y
LOT r-
P-B28 J- 1 \ /
Z Jo
® \ ,t4 I rt1 m~
P~ 1329 rNj + I 14/3626 S.F. / IQz
I. m
®~-1327 / ~i 'o \\I -,,-x.30 Ac. Iz
o
\ I/ N 11659 \ I I ID
\ I \ x X 1162.6 \ r/
I \ \ \I I i \ N.b` 143626/S.F.
x I 1
47-- N 8 38'WOE 479.56' _ - J
I / ; X
/ I I \ \ X 1167.1
a ~$4\G9 /5. F. N.~ 108409 S. F. Ic!
ST. CROIX COUNTY
WISCONSIN
PLANNING & ZONING DEPT.
/ \ N / / N ■ N ■ rN.■~ ST. CROIX COUNTY GOVERNMENT CENTER
1101 Carmichael Road
► - - Hudson, WI 54016-7710
(715) 386-4680 FAX (715) 386-4684
April 25, 2005
Ms. Mary Jo Hollister, CST #224832
Hollister's Soil Testing
W9875 690'h Ave.
River Falls, WI 54022
Re: Revisions for Soil Evaluation Reports - Forest Ridge Estates, Hammond Twp.
Dear Ms. Hollister:
On April 21s~ I performed on-site verifications of data reported for lots 27, 28, 29 and 30 to determine
the cause of discrepancies between the engineer's preliminary plat elevations and those on the soil
reports. There was an error in your method for calculating the benchmark elevations in relation to mean
sea level contours, which resulted in the contours not matching the elevations described for soil borings
and test pits. While on the site, I walked all four lots and found that some of the distances between test
pits and hand borings did not match measurements represented the scale used for their associated plot
plans. In order for mound systems to be designed, corrections need to be made.
To summarize my findings:
1. All lots whose reports used mean sea level elevations need to be revised so that the benchmarks
are based on an assumed 100.0 ft elevation. This will require using your field notes and,
starting with every BM #1, add the back-sight rod reading to 100'to give a new height of
instrument. Then re-calculate (subtract from HI) all the foresight rod readings to obtain test pit
and/or boring elevations related to the BM #1 and draw up new plot plans to correspond w'
the new contours. Lots reported using mean sea level were 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, 10, 17, 21, 24126,
27, 28, and 29.
2. Do not exclude any previously reported test pits. They must be included in revised evaluations
and shown on the plot plans. This will help avoid confusion when locations for mound contours
are being established. The distances between test pits within tested areas need to be updated
from the original 2002 plot plans.
3. Original signed and dated revised reports must be submitted to our office so that they can be
attached to the previous submittals to track changes made.
4. I evaluated a hand boring on lot 28 that was next to a test pit that had been marked with a lathe
labeled "29A" (from the original lot numbering). It was approx. 95' southwest of the corner
benchmarks and 20 ft. west of the test pit you now show as "A". The original site was an
excavated pit, not a hand boring, as evidenced by backfill. Regardless, both test pits were
Hollister - Page 2
described as having redox features within 3 inches of the A-horizon. I found mottling in the
sample I examined just below the A-horizon boundary, so am requiring that any mound design
be restricted to the northerly test pits B, C, and E.
5. Based on the soil evaluation for lot 28, all four lots fronting on Cty. Rd. E appear to have serious
limitations for POWTS installation other than the tested areas already documented. This means
that as damage to existing tested areas may eliminate the possibility of POWTS installation,
unless an A+0" mound design is approved by the Dept. of Commerce after the requisite on-site
evaluation by Leroy Jansky. I will send a copy of this letter to the current owner of the lot to
forewarn him of this situation. Would you please re-establish the marking tape to indicate the
locations of these areas, since you are more familiar with the terrain?
Sanitary permits cannot be issued for the lots referenced above until the soil reports in question have
been corrected and/or completed.
If you have any questions regarding the above requested changes and/or additions to the soil reports,
please feel free to contact me at the Zoning office number and schedule a meeting to discuss the soil
data for Forest Ridge Estates.
Sin
c
Pamela Quinn, qCST665054
Zoning Specialist
Cc: Mark Sylla, Developer
Kernon Bast, Edina Realty
Leroy Jansky, Dept. of Commerce POWTS Wastewater Specialist
Subdivision file