Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout022-1099-90-700 Parcel 022-1099-90-700 03/03/2008 11:04 AM PAGE 1 OF 1 Alt. Parcel 34.28.18.538G 022 - TOWN OF KINNICKINNIC Current X ST. CROIX COUNTY, WISCONSIN Creation Date Historical Date Map # Sales Area Application # Permit # Permit Type 09/05/2006 00 0 Tax Address: Owner(s): O = Current Owner, C = Current Co-Owner O - LEE, J KENNETH & RUTH A J KENNETH & RUTH A LEE N8795 862ND ST RIVER FALLS WI 54022 Districts: SC = School SP = Special Property Address(es): Primary Type Dist # Description " 1205 CTY RD M SC 4893 RIVER FALLS SP 0100 CHIP VALLEY VOTECH Legal Description: Acres: 7.159 Plat: 5252-CSM 21-5252 SEC 34 T28N R18W NW SW CSM 21-5252 LOT 4 Block/Condo Bldg: LOT 04 EZ-1499/367 Tract(s): (Sec-Twn-Rng 401/4 1601/4) 34-28N-18W NW SW Notes: Parcel History: Date Doc # Vol/Page Type 08/03/2006 831237 CSM 06/24/2004 766848 18/4779 CSM 01/09/1998 570995 1287/124 TD 2008 SUMMARY Bill Fair Market Value: Assessed with: Use Value Assessment Valuations: Last Changed: 08/08/2007 Description Class Acres Land Improve Total State Reason AGRICULTURAL G4 7.159 1,100 0 1,100 NO Totals for 2008: General Property 7.159 1,100 0 1,100 Woodland 0.000 0 0 Totals for 2007: General Property 7.159 1,100 0 1,100 Woodland 0.000 0 0 Lottery Credit: Claim Count: 0 Certification Date: Batch Specials: User Special Code Category Amount Special Assessments Special Charges Delinquent Charges Total 0.00 0.00 0.00 Safety and Buildings 10541N RANCH ROAD commerce.wi.gov HAYWARD WI 54843 TDD (608) 264-8777 i s c o n s i n w~vw•cww w.wisconsin.g ov Department of Commerce Jim Doyle, Governor Mary P. Burke, Secretary June 20, 2006 CUST ID No. 227387 ATTN.• PO WTS Inspector THOMAS C NELSON ZONING OFFICE ENVIRONMENTAL BY DESIGN ST CROIX COUNTY SPIA 1432 120TH ST 1101 CARMICHAEL RD NEW RICHMOND WI 54017 HUDSON WI 54016 CONDITIONAL APPROVAL PLAN APPROVAL EXPIRES: 06/20/20 Identification Numbers Transaction ID No. 1279895 SITE: Ken Lee Site ID No. 714365 Town of Kinnickinnic, St Croix C ty,, Please refer to both identification NW 1/4, SW 1/4, S34, T28N, R18W numbers, above, in all correspondence with the agency. FOR: Object Type: Soil Saturation Determination Regulated Object ID No.: 1081215 The submittal described above has been reviewed for conformance with applicable Wisconsin Administrative Codes and Wisconsin Statutes. The submittal has been CONDITIONALLY APPROVED. The owner, as defined in chapter 101.01(10), Wisconsin Statutes, is responsible for compliance with all code requirements. The following conditions shall be met during construction or installation and prior to occupancy or use: 1. Approval is hereby granted pursuant to s. Comm 85.60(2), Wis. Adm. Code, to estimate the depth to seasonal soil saturation based on an interpretive determination process. Approval of the interpretive determination negates the requirement in s. Comm 85.30(2)(b), Wis. Adm. Code to designate the ground surface as the highest level of soil saturation when redoximorphic features are less than 4 inches below the bottom of the A horizon. 2. The estimated highest level of prolonged soil saturation approved under this determination is 6 inches below grade. At least 30 inches of sand lift on top of 6 inches of unsaturated, in-situ soil is required for adequate treatment and dispersal. 3. The basal soil application rate for the mound shall be <_0.20 gpd/sf, and the linear loading rate <_4.5 gpd/ft. 4. Chisel plowing to a depth of >_15 inches immediately prior to sand placement is required to improve vertical water movement into the soil solum. 5. Landscaping up slope of the mound shall be incorporated into the POWTS design to prevent surface water from concentrating along the up slope edge of the mound and to divert surface water drainage away from the system. 6. The down slope toe shall have a slope ration of at least 4:1 and the upslope toe at a point L/2 must have a 6:1 slope ration applied. The upslope slope ratio at the ends of the should be 3:1. THOMAS C NELSON Page 2 6/20/2006 These design criteria will create a condition where surface water cannot pond up slope and behind the mound. 7. This approval shall remain valid unless the site is altered in such a way that the depth to soil saturation would change or if saturated conditions are observed for seven consecutive days at depths less than 3 feet below the infiltrative surface of the POWTS distribution component. 8. This approval in no way relinquishes the use of color patterns to estimate the depth to high groundwater on any other parcels or portions of parcels. 9. A copy of this approval letter and attachments must accompany the mound system design for this site for purposes of plan approval and sanitary permit issuance. If the Interpretive Determination Report was accompanied with a plan and an expiration date is shown on this letter, the expiration date only applies to the plans for the design, not to the decision on the Interpretive Determination Report. A copy of the approved plans, specifications and this letter shall be on-site during construction and open to inspection by authorized representatives of the Department, which may include local inspectors. If plan index sheets were submitted in lieu of additional full plansets, a copy of this approval letter and index sheet shall be attached to plans that correspond with the copy on file with the Department. All permits required by the state or the local municipality shall be obtained prior to commencement of construction/installation/operation. If this construction project will disturb one or more acres of land, an Erosion Control Notice of Intent (NOI) shall be filed with the department 14 days prior to any earth disturbing activities. In granting this approval the Division of Safety & Buildings reserves the right to require changes or additions should conditions arise making them necessary for code compliance. As per state stats 101.12(2), nothing in this review shall relieve the designer of the responsibility for designing a safe building, structure, or component. Inquiries concerning this correspondence may be made to me at the telephone number listed below, or at the address on this letterhead. Sincerely, Fee Required $ 100.00 Fee Received $ 100.00 Balance Due $ 0.00 Leroy G. Jansky, PSS, Wastewater Specialist Integrated Services Bureau WiSMART code: 7633 (715) 726-2544 Office (715) 726-2549 Fax Ijansky@comrnerce.state.wi.us Introduction: 12 7 9 8 9 5 L o 3 On October 15, 2005, Thomas Nelson, CSTM, Environmental By Design conducted a soil and site evaluation on property located in the NW 1/4, SW 1/4, Section 34, T28N-18W, " ,innic, platted as lot 3 of Ken Lee subdivision, this purpose being to determine' soil saturation so that a POWTS might be installed. This investigation revealed t e ss'b s W0We i%og= for an A+0 mound system through an interpretive determination as designa t Of Commerce's Administrative Code, Comm 85. DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE DIVI 'i0N OF SAFETY AND BUILDINGS Methodology: Backhoe pits were provided for three borings, 1 through 3, with interpre %ons o e s esCsi~u i ify conducted by using soil redoximorphic features, soil texture, soil structure, soil color pursuant to the guidelines under Chapter Comm 85 of the Wisconsin Administrative Code and using the USDA-NRCS soil descriptive system. During this field investigation the landscapes morphological features, vegetation, and hydrology was determined for the purpose of this Interpretive Determination as defined in Comm 85.60(2) of the Wisconsin Administrative Code. Upon completion of the collected field data, which included the accurate measurement of the sites featured parameters, site plans, system design, and this interpretive report have been developed for review. The intent is to demonstrate that a minimum of 6 inches of unsaturated soil exists on this site and any influencing factors on this would allow the compliant installation of a mound system serving a residential use for this property as allowed under Comm 83.44(3xb) of the Wisconsin Administrative Code. Local Hydrology: The local hydrology of this site is influenced by the average of 30 inches of precipitation received. The soil properties and localized topography both influence water movement on this property. Seasonal issues such as frozen ground and warm temperatures also have their influences during the winter months when the ground is frozen, there would be an accumulation of snow with any melting action running off the site on the surface of the ground. Spring rains would produce additional surface runoff until the ground has thawed. Upon thawing, the influence on groundwater levels would be minimal due to the location of the site with its limited upslope watershed. The 5 percent surface slope would also aid the slower permeability of the soils. Summer temperatures and plant growth would provide removal of soil moisture through evaporation and evapotranspiration. Local Geomorphology, Soil Disturbance, and Local Topography The geologic interpretation of this area directly related to the glacial geology of the Eastern St. Croix Moraine, a ground moraine that was formed by the accumulation beneath the glacier and resulted in a composition of stony, reddish-brown glacial drift. Post-glacial windblown silts formed loess deposits that overlays this till. Below is the Cambrian bedrock Prairie Du Chien formation, a dolitimized limestone formation. Soil forming activities have resulted in what is known as the Northern Till Uplands soils resulting in dark silty soils. The site was probably originally in crop production in previous years. However, at the time of this determination it was grass. This hillside has a 5 percent slopes and was probably formed as the advancing ice scoured the landscape, retreated, depositing the till material, forming the rounded knobs of the hillside. Soil Series and Mapping Units The St. Croix County Soil Survey has mapped this area as being of Derinda Variant silt loam soil series, which consists of gently sloping, somewhat poorly drained soils. These soils are on low ridges and foot slopes of ground moraines. They formed in silty sediment and the underlying silty clay weathered from shale. The DfB soils of this series are representative as described by the Soil Survey and are represented by a surface layer that is approximately 9 inches of very dark gray silt loam. The subsurface layer is dark grayish brown mottled silt loam and about 5 inches thick. The subsoil is about 16 inches thick. The upper part is brown, mottled, firm silt loam; the lower part is a olive and olive gray, very firm, mottled silty clay. The substratum, to a depth of 60 inches, is olive gray and pale green clay shale. There are limestone fragments in the shale. Data The soils evaluation report and system design have been included with this report. ➢ A copy of the USDA Soil Survey map that provides the soil-mapping unit described above. ➢ A USGS Topographic Map, revealing the topography of the site. ➢ POWT site plan, representing the best location and layout of the system that best treats and distributes the systems discharge water. Government Reports Leroy Jansky, Wisconsin Department of Commerce Wastewater Specialist has visited the property, and a report has been filed. Additional Information Unique to the site During the evaluation there was the observation of biological activity in the form of worm burrows and roots. Worm activity was recognized at a depth of 8 inches in boring 2 and at a depth of 9 inches in boring two. Foot activity was observed at 14 inches on boring 1, 13 inches on boring 2, 15 inches in boring 3. It is recognized that these biological activities are normally not apparent in zones that are saturated for long periods of time. These factors further support the suggestion that this portion of the profile dries quickly after a precipitation event. Recommendations The recommendation for the site would be for the site to be chisel plowed to a depth of at least 15 inches so as to breakup the soil interface and reorient the platy structure in a more vertical position, thus aiding infiltration. From the upside slope of the system area, 30 inches of ASTM C-33 sand lift will be placed on the plowed area. This provides the 36 inches of vertical separation to provide the treatment of pathogenic organisms. The recommended mound design uses a linear loading rate of 4.5 gpd/ft and an in-situ soil application rate of 0.2gpd/fl . This will be accomplished by designing the absorption area to be long and narrow and extended the down slope toe area to a 4:1 dimension, effectively increasing the basal area and eliminating the chances of toe seepage. Additionally, the slope on the upper toe edge of the mound will be constructed so as to be a slope with a 3:1 side slope at each end and a 6:1 side slope for the 1 dimension (upper slope) at a point L/2 (this being the location at half the distance of the total length of the mound) so as to help divert surface water from the upper slope (See included suggested mound detail plan). Finally the design requires that a water diversion ditch be installed above the mound so as to divert surface waters from the upslope area This should be installed with a 5:1 slope, a width of eleven feet, and oriented so that it traverses the contour slightly, draining the run off water north and down slope of the mound area. Conclusions It is my belief that the soils in the area of the proposed POWS will not be saturated above 6' for seven or more consecutive days for the following reasons: The described soils at this location supports the mapped description, however, the depth of redux features was observed lower in the profile than described by the soil survey. ➢ The biological activity in the soil as represented by the roots and Earth Worm presence, suggest that the soil has not been saturated in the most recent history of the soils. These activities cannot survive in saturated conditions. ➢ A design with a long and narrow system representing a linear loading rate of 4.5 gallons per day per foot and an in-site soil application rate of .0.2gpd/ft`t. This configuration represents the best distribution of the wastewater, spreading it over a longer area. With the increased height of the mound, there is the assurance that there will be 3 feet of filtration between the bottom of the system and the zone of saturation. Also built into the plan is the increased dimension of the upslope of the mound, providing a 6:1 slope at the L/2 location, and the addition of a drainage ditch above the mound. These last two additional features will minimize surface runoff onto the mound area from higher elevations behind the system. The total design assures that the requirements of Comm. 83.41 of the Wisconsin Administrative Code are being met so as to properly filter the wastewater and to assure that there is no surface discharge, with discharge going below grade. ➢ The mound septic design and management plan provides proper treatment of wastewater and expected system longevity. Accordingly, the plan submittal addresses the methods and design for treatment and dispersal of the wastewater below the surface as addressed by the code requirements. Y In each pit that was dug the prominence and size of RMFS increases with depth suggesting that the lower horizons are more saturated for a longer period of time. The second horizon in each pit while being saturated for a given period, are not as saturated as the horizons below. ➢ The matric colors of the soil chanties from l Ovr3/2 to l Ovr4/3 and 5vr5/3 as you do lower in the soil profile suggesting more saturated conditions lower in the profile. The final authority for this site's approval rests with the appropriate regulatory agencies: the Wisconsin Department of Commerce and the St. Croix County Zoning officials. Thomas C Nel CST 227 May 23 2006 Wisconsin Department of Commerce SOIL EVALUATION REPORT Page 1 of 3 Division of Safety and Buildings in accordance with Comm 85, Wis. Adm. Code AMY St. Croix Attach complete site plan on paper not less than 81/2 x 11 inches in size. Plan must include, but not limited to: vertical and horizontal reference point (BM), direction and Pamal .l.D. percent slope, scale or dimensions, north arrow, and location and distance to nearest road. ©2 2 - l) - (w Please , print all Information. Reviewed by Date Personal information you provide may be used for secondary purposes (Privacy Law, s. 15.04 (1) (m)). ► 1 r PMp9rty0wnW P Location Ken and Ruth Ann Lee Go of NW 1/4 SW 1/4 S 34 T 28 N R 18 ())WW Property Owners Mailing Address Lot # Block # Subd. Name or' CSM# 2 5 2 C~ Z N8795 862nd Street 3b Lee City State Zip Code Phone Number Village EE]Town Nearest Road River Falls WI 54022 ( Kinnickinnic CTH M E] New Construction Use Residential / Number of bedrooms 3 to 4 Code derived design flow rate 450 to 600 GPD Replacement b Public or commercial - Describe: Parent material Loess over glacial Till Flood Plain elevation if applicable MA- General ft. comments Site suitable for an A+0 system design only and recommendations: State and county have visited the site 1❑ Boring # ~11 Boring I 1 Pit Ground surface elev. 96.73 ft. Depth to limiting factor 9 in. Sal ication Rate Horizon Depth Dominant Color Redox Description Texture Structure Consistence Boundary Roots GPD/ft? in. Munsell Qu. Sz. Cont. Color Gr. Sz'. Sh. 'Eif#1 "Eff#2 1 0-9 10yr3/2 - sil 2msbk mfr as 2f .6 .8 2 9-13 1 0vr4/-3 c2f7.5yr5/8 sicl 2msbk mfr cw if .4 .6 3 13-20 5y5/3 m2p7.5yr5/8 cl Om mvfi ,0 .0 2 Boring # Boring 99.15 15 0 Pit Ground surface elev. ft. Depth to limiting factor in. Soil ica ion Rate Horizon Depth Dominant Color Redox Description Texture Structure Consistence Boundary Roots GPDIfe in. Munsell Qu. Sz. Cont. Color Gr. Sz. Sh. `Eff#1 "Eff#2 1 0-7 10yr3/2 - sil 2msbk mff as 2f .6 .8 2 7-15 1 Ovr4/4 - sicl 2msbk mfr cw if .4 .6 3 15-20 10yr4/4 f217.5yr5/8 sicl lmsbk mfr - - .2 .3 " Effluent #1 = BOD > 30 < 220 mg/L and TSS >30 < 150 mg/L " Effluent #2 = BOD 130 mg/L and TSS < 30 mg/L CST Name (Please Print) _ Signature / CST Number Thomas C Nelson C 227387 Address Date Evaluation Conducted Telephone Number 1432 120th Street, New Richmond, WI 10/15/05 715-246-2454 Property Owner Ken and Ruth Ann Lee Parcel ID # Pending Page 2 of 3 Boring Mng # E] Pit Ground surface elev. 97.25 ft. Depth to limiting factor 11 in. Soil Application Rate Horizon Depth Dominant Color Redox Description Texture Structure Consistence Boundary Roots GPDtW in. Munsell Qu. Sz. Cont. Color Gr. Sz. Sh. *Eff#1 *Eff#2 1 0-8 10yr3/2 - sil 2msbk mfr as 2f .6 .8 2 8-11 1 4/3 - Sid 2msbk mfr cw if .4 .6 3 11-17 10yr4/3 c2d7.5yr5/8 Sid l msbk mfr cw if .2 .3 4 17-20 5y5/3 m2p7.5yr5/8 cl Om mvfi - - 0.0 0.0 ❑ Boring # S Boring Pit Ground surface elev. ft. Depth to limiting factor in. Soil Application Rate Horizon Depth Dominant Color Redox Description Texture Stricture Consistence Boundary Roots GPD/fF in. Munsell Qu..Sz. Cont. Color Gr. Sz. Sh. *Eff#1 *F Boring # Bourg u ~ pit Ground surface elev. ft. Depth to limiting factor in. Sal icatlon Rate Horizon Depth Dominant Color Redox Description Texture Structure Consistence Boundary Roots GPD/ff in. Munsell Qu. Sz. Cont. Color Gr. Sz. Sh. *Eff#1 *Eff#2 I " Effluent #1 = BODS > 30 < 220 mglL and TSS >30 < 150 mgA. ` Effluent #2 = BODS < 30 mg/L and TSS < 30 mglL The Department of Commerce is an equal-opportunity serv4oe provider and employer. If youneed assistance to access w4 vices or need material in an alternate format, please contact the department at 608-266-3151 or TTY 608-264-8777. SM-8330 A (1.07/00) Ken Lee Lot 3 CTH M + 244.36 i BM2 SM1 52.29' N E 35' L I o 69' t 131 C ~ 123' or e I n r I B2 5% slope 1 ■ B3 Nort l Scale 1'= 30' BM1 Top of iron pipe 100.00' BM2 Top of iron pipe 98.00' 61 96.73' 62 99.15' B3 97.25' Thomas C Nelson 227387 'r Ken Lee Lot 3 CTH M BM2 BM1 N E BI L 0 B t 1 0 r n e Mound area r approximatly 37' by 136' ■ B2 5' A B3 11 rnnde diversion ditch with 5.1 side slopes Purpose of diverting water from the Scale 1'= 30' back side of the mound. This ditch traverses BM1 Top of iron pipe 100.00' the contour line and drains NW of the mound BM2 Top of iron pipe 98.00' B1 96.73' 82 99.15' 83 97.25' Thomas C Nelson A 11' A' B 11 B' 227387 ir 1' depth 1' ditch bottom System location I l i +d, a. 1 12 79 8 9 5 Introduction: On October 15, 2005, Thomas Nelson, CSTM, Environmental By Design co nd site evaluation on property located in the NW 1/4, SW 1/4, Section 34, T2 8N- wlaiauy nmc, platted as lot 4 of Ken Lee subdivision, this purpose being to detee nal soil d for saturation so that a POWTS might be installed. This investigation rev e e Went an A+0 mound system through an interpretive determination as deli a 'v' Of Commerce's Administrative Code, Comm 85. DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE DIVIS N OF SAFETY AND UILDiNGS Methodology: EE CO ESPO ENCE Backhoe pits were provided for three borings, 1 through 3, with interpretations of the sites suitability b g conducted by using soil redoximorphic features, soil texture, soil structure, soil color pursuant to the guidelines under Chapter Comm 85 of the Wisconsin Administrative Code and using the USDA-NRCS soil descriptive system. During this field investigation the landscapes morphological features, vegetation, and hydrology was determined for the purpose of this Interpretive Determination as defined in Comm 85.60(2) of the Wisconsin Administrative Code. Upon completion of the collected field data, which included the accurate measurement of the sites featured parameters, site plans, system design, and this interpretive report have been developed for review. The intent is to demonstrate that a minimum of 6 inches of unsaturated soil exists on this site and any influencing factors on this would allow the compliant installation of a mound system serving a residential use for this property as allowed under Comm 83.44(3)(b) of the Wisconsin Administrative Code. Local Hydrology: The local hydrology of this site is influenced by the average of 30 inches of precipitation received. The soil properties and localized topography both influence water movement on this property. Seasonal issues such as frozen ground and warm temperatures also have their influences during the winter months when the ground is frozen, there would be an accumulation of snow with any melting action running off the site on the surface of the ground. Spring rains would produce additional surface runoff until the ground has thawed. Upon thawing, the influence on groundwater levels would be minimal due to the location of the site with its limited upslope watershed. The 4 percent surface slope would also aid the slower permeability of the soils. Summer temperatures and plant growth would provide removal of soil moisture through evaporation and evapotranspiration. Local Geomorphology, Soil Disturbance, and Local Topography The geologic interpretation of this area directly related to the glacial geology of the Eastern St. Croix Moraine, a ground moraine that was formed by the accumulation beneath the glacier and resulted in a composition of stony, reddish-brown glacial drift. Post-glacial windblown silts formed loess deposits that overlays this till. Below is the Cambrian bedrock Prairie Du Chien formation, a dolitimizcd limestone formation. Soil forming activities have resulted in what is known as the Northern Till Uplands soils resulting in dark silty soils. The site was probably originally in crop production in previous years. However, at the time of this determination it was grass. This hillside has a 4 percent slopes and was probably formed as the advancing ice scoured the landscape, retreated, depositing the till material, forming the rounded knobs of the hillside. Soil Series and Mapping Units The St. Croix County Soil Survey has mapped this area as being of Derinda Variant silt loam soil series, which consists of gently sloping, somewhat poorly drained soils. These soils are on low ridges and foot slopes of ground moraines. They formed in silty sediment and the underlying silty clay weathered from shale. The DrB soils of this series are representative as described by the Soil Survey and are represented by a surface layer that is approximately 9 inches of very dark gray silt loam. The subsurface layer is dark grayish brown mottled silt loam and about 5 inches thick. The subsoil is about 16 inches thick. The upper part is brown, mottled, firm silt loam; the lower part is a olive and olive gray, very firm, mottled silty clay. The substratum, to a depth of 60 inches, is olive gray and pale green clay shale. There are limestone fragments in the shale. Data ➢ The soils evaluation report and system design have been included with this report. ➢ A copy of the USDA Soil Survey map that provides the soil-mapping unit described above. A USGS Topographic Map, revealing the topography of the site. ➢ POWT site plan, representing the best location and layout of the system that best treats and distributes the systems discharge water. Government Reports Leroy Jansky, Wisconsin Department of Commerce Wastewater Specialist has visited the property, and a report has been filed. Additional Information Unique to the site During the evaluation there was the observation of biological activity in the form of worm burrows and roots. Worm activity was recognized at a depth of 7 inches in boring 2 and at a depth of 7 inches in boring three. Root activity was observed at 13 inches on boring 1, 15 inches on boring 2, 13 inches in boring 3. It is recognized that these biological activities are normally not apparent in zones that are saturated for long periods of time. These factors further support the suggestion that this portion of the profile dries quickly after a precipitation event. Recommendations The recommendation for the site would be for the site to be chisel plowed to a depth of at least 15 inches so as to breakup the soil interface and reorient the platy structure in a more vertical position, thus aiding infiltration. From the upside slope of the system area, 30 inches of ASTM C-33 sand lift will be placed on the plowed area. This provides the 36 inches of vertical separation to provide the treatment of pathogenic organisms. The recommended mound design uses a linear loading rate of 4.5 gpd/ft and an in-situ soil application rate of 0.2gpd/ft2. This will be accomplished by designing the absorption area to be long and narrow and extended the down slope toe area to a 4:1 dimension, effectively increasing the basal area and eliminating the chances of toe seepage. Additionally, the slope on the upper toe edge of the mound will be constructed so as to be a slope with a 3:1 side slope at each end and a 6:1 side slope for the I dimension (upper slope) at a point L/2 (this being the location at half the distance of the total length of the mound) so as to help divert surface water from the upper slope (See included suggested mound detail plan). Finally the design requires that a water diversion ditch be installed above the mound so as to divert surface waters from the upslope area This should be installed with a 5:1 slope, a width of eleven feet, and oriented so that it traverses the contour slightly, draining the run off water north and down slope of the mound area. Conclusions It is my belief that the soils in the area of the proposed POWS will not be saturated above 6" for seven or more consecutive days for the following reasons: ➢ The described soils at this location supports the mapped description, however, the depth of redox features was observed lower in the profile than described by the soil survey. ➢ The biological activity in the soil as represented by the roots and Earth Worm presence, suggest that the soil has not been saturated in the most recent history of the soils. These activities cannot survive in saturated conditions. ➢ A design with a long and narrow system representing a linear loading rate of 4.5 gallons per day per foot and an in-site soil application rate of .0.2gpd/ft2t. This configuration represents the best distribution of the wastewater, spreading it over a longer area. With the increased height of the mound, there is the assurance that there will be 3 feet of filtration between the bottom of the system and the zone of saturation. Also built into the plan is the increased dimension of the upslope of the mound, providing a 6:1 slope at the U2 location, and the addition of a drainage ditch above the mound. These last two additional features will minimize surface runoff onto the mound area from higher elevations behind the system. The total design assures that the requirements of Comm. 83.41 of the Wisconsin Administrative Code are being met so as to properly filter the wastewater and to assure that there is no surface discharge, with discharge going below grade. ➢ The mound septic design and management plan provides proper treatment of wastewater and expected system longevity. Accordingly, the plan submittal addresses the methods and design for treatment and dispersal of the wastewater below the surface as addressed by the code requirements. Y In each pit that was dug the prominence and size of R ff S increases with depth suggesting that the lower horizons are more saturated for a longer period of time. The second horizon in each pit while being saturated for a given period, are not as saturated as the horizons below. The matric colors of the soil changes from 10yr3/2 to 10yr4/3 and I Oyr5/3 as you go lower in the soil profile suggesting more saturated conditions lower in the profile. The final authority for this site's approval rests with the appropriate regulatory agencies: the Wisconsin Department of Commerce and the St. Croix County Zoning officials. Thomas C N 1 CST 227387 May 23 2006 RECEIVED Wisconsin Department ofCom erce APR 0 3 06 1 EVALUATION REPORT Page 1 of 3 Division of safety and Buildings ST. C 8 Ws. Adm. Code County St. Croix Attach complete site plan on lager not less than 81/2 x 11 size Ian must include, but not limited to: vertical and horizontal re rence po (B on and Parcel I.D. din percent slope, scale or dimensions, north arrow, and location an ista o nearest road. LZ ((7(~ } Please print all information. Reviewed by Date Personal information you provide may be used for secondary purposes (Privacy Law, s. 15.04 (1) (m))./ Property Owner Property Location 11 Ken and Ruth Ann Lee Govt. Lot NW 1/4 SW 114 28 N R 18 E(r) W Property Owner's Mailing Address Lot # Block # Subd. Na or CSM# N8795 862nd stmt 3b L, 1 45 City State Zip Code Phone Number []City Village ■ ; Town Nearest Ro d River Falls WI 54022 ( ) CTH M New Construction UseE] Residential / Number of bedrooms 3 to 4 Code derived design flow rate 450 to 600 GPD Replacement Public or commercial - Describe: Parent material Loess aver g4acial Till flood Plain elevation if ap"g)fe b1A ft. General comments Site suitable for an A+0 system design only and recommendations: State and county have visite a site Boring # 0 Boring III III ED Pit Ground surface elev. 96.73 ft. Depth to limiting factor 9 in. Sal Application Rate Horizon Depth Dominant Color Redox Description Texture Structure Consistence Boundary Roots GPD/ff in. Munsell Qu. Sz. Cart. Color Gr. Sz. Sh. *Eff#1 `Eff#2 1 0-9 10yr3/2 sil 2msbk mfr as 2f .6 .8 2 9-13 10 4/3 c2f7.*5yTV8 sicl 2msbk mr cw if A '6 3 13-20 5y5/3 m2p7.5yr5/8 Cl Om mvff .0 •0 F1 2 Boring # 0 Boring 99.15 15 Q Pit Ground surface elev. ft. Depth to limiting factor in. Soil Application Rate Horizon Depth Dominant Color Redox Description Texture Structure Consistence Boundary Roots GPD/ff in. Munsell Qu. Sz. Cont. Color Gr. Sz. Sh. "Eff#1 `Eff#2 ~y 1 0-7 1Oyr3/2 sil 2msbk mff as 2f .6 .8 2 7-15 1 4/4 sicl 2msbk mfr cw if .4 .6 3 15-20 1Oyr4/4 f2t7.5yr5/8 sicl lmsbk mfr - - .2 .3 " Effluent #1 = BOD, > 30 s 720 mgtL and TSS >30.5 150 mg/L ' Effluent #2 = BOq < 30 mg/L and TSS s 30 nVL CST Name (Please Print) Signature CST Number Thomas C Nelson 227387 Address Date Evaluation Conducted Telephone Number 1432 120th Street, New Richmond, WI 10/15/05 715-246-2454 Property Owner Ken and Ruth Ann Lee Parcel ID # Pending Page 2 of 3 11 Boring ❑ Boring # E] pit Ground surface elev. 97'25 ft. Depth to limiting factor 11 in. Soil Application Rate Horizon Depth Dominant Color Redox Description Texture Structure Consistence Boundary Roots GPD/fF in. Munsell Qu. Sz. Cont. Color Gr. Sz. Sh. *Eff#1 *Eff#2 ~j 1 0-8 10yr3/2 - sil 2msbk mfr as 2f .6 .8 2 8-11 1 4/3 - sicl 2msbk mfr cw if .4 .6 3 11-17 10yr4/3 c2d7.5yr5/8 sicl lmsbk mfr cw if .2 .3 4 17-20 5y5/3 m2p7.5yr5/8 cl Om mvfi - - 0.0 0.0 ❑ Boring # Boring Pit Ground surface elev. ft. Depth to limiting factor in. Sal Application Rate Horizon Depth Dominant Color Redox Description Texture Structure Consistence Boundary Roots GPD/f? in. Munsell Qu. Sz. Cont. Color Gr. Sz. Sh. *Eff01 *Ef1#2 I it Boring # Boring F-1 Pit Ground surface elev. ft. Depth to limiting factor in. Sal lication Rate Horizon Depth Dominant Color Redox Description Texture Structure Consistence Boundary Roots GPD/ff? in. Munsefl Qu. Sz. Cont. Color Gr. Sz. Sh. *Eff#1 *Eff#2 * Effluent #1 = BODS > 30 < 220 mg/L and TSS >30:5 150 mg/L * Effluent #2 = BODS < 30 mg/L and TSS < 30 mg/L The Department of Commerce is an equal opportunity service provider and employer. If you need assistance to access services or need material in an alternate format, please contact the department at 608-266-3151 or TTY 608-264-8777. SM4330Tcst',R.07/00j Ken Lee Lot 3 CTH M BM2 BM1 52.29' N E 35' L 0 69' t B1■ C 68' 123' o n e r B2 50 slope I 7',. ■ B3 O I Scale 1°= 30' BM1 Top of iron pipe 100.00' BM2 Top of iron pipe 98.00' B1 96.73' B2 99.15' B3 97.25' Thomas C Nelson 227387 i Parcel 022-1099-90-600 03/03/2008 11:04 AM PAGE 1 OF 1 022 - TOWN OF KINNICKINNIC Alt. Parcel 34.28.18.538E Current X ST. CROIX COUNTY, WISCONSIN Creation Date Historical Date Map # Sales Area Application # Permit # Permit Type 09/05/2006 00 0 Tax Address: Owner(s): O = Current Owner, C = Current Co-Owner O - LEE, J KENNETH & RUTH A J KENNETH & RUTH A LEE N8795 862ND ST RIVER FALLS WI 54022 Districts: SC = School SP = Special Property Address(es): Primary Type Dist # Description ' 1203 CTY RD M SC 4893 RIVER FALLS SP 0100 CHIP VALLEY VOTECH Legal Description: Acres: 6.051 Plat: 5252-CSM 21-5252 SEC 34 T28N R18W NW SW CSM 21-5252 LOT 3 Block/Condo Bldg: LOT 03 EZ-1499/367 Tract(s): (Sec-Twn-Rng 401/4 1601/4) 34-28N-18W NW SW Notes: Parcel History: Date Doc # Vol/Page Type 08/03/2006 831237 CSM 06/24/2004 766848 18/4779 CSM 01/09/1998 570995 1287/124 TD 2008 SUMMARY Bill Fair Market Value: Assessed with: Use Value Assessment Valuations: Last Changed: 08/08/2007 Description Class Acres Land Improve Total State Reason AGRICULTURAL G4 6.051 900 0 900 NO Totals for 2008: General Property 6.051 900 0 9000 Woodland 0.000 0 Totals for 2007: General Property 6.051 900 0 900 Woodland 0.000 0 0 Lottery Credit: Claim Count: 0 Certification Date: Batch Specials: User Special Code Category Amount Special Assessments Special Charges Delinquent Charges Total 0.00 0.00 0.00 AM aSegzeO zelnSau uoou-s sAepzrgeS anuany e}oJeCI V LtL£-8tZ PxEnld se fto(i ' laa4S 7118'N'PuOu li:)rd MaN Io S41D HIMIV Id HV.LS uoou-6 'leS IR I-6 leS PUZ 1a-mS M 090L-SYZ -aOOOH a^alS f I I-6 ATIMUS PUZ ualulM IS IRS6I "IIeH -01 PIO Z}(I6-9tz zaMS wNeQ NCO WE ud 9-9'paM Pz£'ZI-S sAepzn}eS y}S 18 Pz£'lsI x a Mt-9Z sauteH pzegald IIeH uMo,L Q13I10NIMS £-6 sAepzn}eS qlt zg PuZ + OLt£-LbZ 11PH uMOI S£ 'A-H St/ 'IIeH 11na01 Sas-daWOS a Ae(I aBegzeO relnSag 9£Zg-6K IzaIJ uMoy HdaSOI',LS ZI-8 sAPPngeS Pz£ 22 }sI :sa)U!M ZS9Z t89 zagaewngaS uoQ I ZI 8 sAepzlyeS :zaununS anuany q" Ham HSR?I aad - saauegdde 'lelaw dezaS '£-6 sAepiMeS 8"s-M japes uaueM I I IIeH uMol QNOWHJI2I I ' Aep zad sznoH tZ + IfZZ-966 MON A ze,I IIeH llA1O.L ia11VA d.NVSVa1d uoou-S sdepzules ylt 29 PUZ a ZS£O-IZS 1-9-A xaSOS 59 ' H 18 I TH AID "IIeH -91, PIO JINNDIJINNIN ' AeQ aFegzeO zelnSag £9Zt-98£ IAaID MeyS !T)!A NOSQfIH L-0£ t 'PaM 't-8 '}eS :zaununS x x ' 1-8 sAepzneS I£LZ189 uoszala ua :za;ulM - a w 'OJ gist QNOWW VH £I xagolop nuealDned ~m I-8'IeS'L-t'PaM7daS- elf ZS£t-S9ZPelsiefl y - 'I-8 .les .ady - 700 - entl g709L 660£ 'zaluaD8utpd0 H QOOMIsIa10 A41J pooMualO se aides sxnOH S4!:) pooMUajO'laa4S zaleM LZZ 0962 £9Z u0sa8I3H uoa1 LSagOd' ' £-6 q}eS s LS06-9tZ ~IAQ -A ugOl IIeH umo,L puouloulyalg aRIIV2Id NI2Ia ,aj L-S'PaM'ZL I I I-8 sa,frjoj p znleS'wS aan uany AV yq }09i IIO s Z9St-S9Z zaU144?M alp'O I Aepsznyy zaq}o Azang Q1V?Ia Wa AeQ aSegzeJ zeln8ag x 80S£-t89 eglznlnl ugol a11vo Rva I Z-8 AePxnle6 Pub ££ZS-gn AaszOQ Uloy ;S }uozd '.yJ A}nmunuoJ ~Ized zaaQ-uolAJ I I ztedall flO le paldaaae ll0 zo;oN 't-s sAepzn}eS N01iJ IIeH uMOL 8LSt ZLL AIPId" IIW LQVJ ` I 9-L sAepsaupaM zaglo IIv'L-I AepsaupaM Ist ££VZ-869 uosuo uo IIeH uMOL x q I Q I NIMQ1Vfl I SUM01,' I Aepuotg Azang x x SS£Z-869 uoslaN Lluf 311IA000M AepsxngL Azana (Aluo sauaeq lp azaazlt;ue 'Ilo pasn) ZOtt-ZLL Ueuuaunu;L ,(I[ags' salgela6aaz 12 qse{L M 'l5 uleW OSI 'Sulplmfl Sugabau a + I sAePud Pz£ 19 lsI -10 uOslatN ana;S NOSIIM I ILt9-89Z ueuualeM x a IM-M aall30 aSeIRA Idd aPd,LS ' I Aepsznyy zo Aepuoy~ aRIIV Se l + x S6££-JZ KzaIJ aILA .La52IaWOS' sAepsanj 9ZI£-6tL ajyasnx)1 uaazoQ S. MOX AeQ aSegnq zelaag x , ItiS-98£ xalsaozl euolO NOSQRH HIS' ON sAepud papaau se sAepuoy~l za uo do ~lald aplsgxnJ - alseM pzek x ZZLZ-96Z K IJ a2eII7 .A' QNOWWVH' Z-S Aepzcq za;uaJ ,ulunu7uto luoid 8699-692 uosdwoq,L puelou J;aaz}S l )Blvd Naga' Aepsany Axana + 9Zt£-t89 zaSupzaQ ApulJ aa.JO a& !A NIMQ1VO ' I 37!s 7so wog 7E po blow j,tt s eP L - 'snI tZ IO1 sa PIUA Sullzed spoolouoaa'0£ZI-0£ 6 7eS °AON"EIN M 9tl x 0060-SZt 7daQ s 4M 'qnd' AeQ aFegzeO zelnSag (salgelaAaaz) A;1Paed s icAl allgnd AID S11V3 HIARi D3oIsa1 7eSPz£181s1 aAV PUZ6I191SglSIi (aPSlsamn-Plwed UO9aas>alul-al?slsOduloa ZL-s sAepzn;es 89Zt-9tZ 1100 AIIJ' Mainglno~ 7eSylt 13 PUZ Ito doxp a;seM pze,, any e4o)F(,/7S qjc gl7oN QNOWHJRI MaN' Ae aSe xe ze nda O£Z-0£ 9 3 W ztz9 £86~9s Q 9 O 1 21 (Aluo Ito xo;ouI) 3 sa ivaS e uawu u nug egoap aSezeJ A;IJ uospnH NOSQRH' ' I-L s,iepzn;eS'UOON-L snepsaupaAA auo AaaeZ z ' L-t sriepsany -;aaz;S za}eM IZZ LZZt S9Z yaS ' td.IJ QOOMNMIO' sai}I:) ' WVNDO-dd3QISfl2Ifl WVIIOONd330-d02IQ J n LJVLNOJ/ALI7vdIJINRW' E5 Cl ZOOZAIR HUO XIOA I ~ ~ . J 'IS szVlua.teWU fo sV 41011113 k. E£N i. WA' 3k REL,15TER = DE~uS ST. CROIX RECEIVED J& R~;.;ORL. 08/03/200i~ 08:00AH CERTCIFIED :3URV£Y HAfl REC. FEE : 1 _t. CzA CERTIFIED SURVEY MAP COPY FEE: 3.00 CC FEE: J. Kenneth and Ruth Ann Lee PAGES: 2, Located in part of the Northeast '/4 of the Southeast '/4 of Section 33, and in part of the Northwest % of the Southwest % of Section 34, RECEIVED all in Township 28 North, Range 18 West, Town of Kinnickinnic, St. Croix County, Wisconsin. N BEARINGS ARE LEGEND V 1 0 2006 REFEJIENCED 0 INDICATES i' O.D. x 18' IRON NO TO THE EAST-WEST PIPE SET (M)N WT. - 1.13 LBA.F.) 114 SECTION LINE OF SECTION 34, o SOIL BORINGS (PROPOSED SEPTIC SYSTEM) ST. CROIX COUNTY T 28 N, R 18 W, SECTION CORNER MONUMENT (AS NOTED ASSUMED AS 0 ) N 89'2471' E. SETBACK LINE SURVEYOR'S RECORD (R=) RECORDED AS SCALE I N FEET 1' 200' INDICATES LIMITED CONSTRUCTION ® EASEMENTAREA 160 160 0 PROPOSED DRIVEWAYLOCA770N NOTE- OWNERS' ADDRESS (MINIMUM 200' SOUTH OF THE GRANTOR, HEIRS AND ASSIGNS RESERVEA LIMITED J. KENNETH & RUTH ANN LEE CENTRERLINE C.T.H. "M-) CONSTRUCTION EASEMENT AS SHOWN ON THIS MAP. IF J. KENNETH 882ND STREET A PUBLIC OR PRIVATE ROAD SYSTEM IS DEVELOPED TO RIVER FALLS, T M 54022 EET SERVE LANDS FURTHER SOUTH, SAID GRANTORS, HEIRS AND ASSIGNS MAY ENTER THIS AREA FOR GRADING OF SURVEYORS' ADDRESS SAID ROAD SYSTEM. THIS LIMITED CONSTRUCTION EASEMENT SHALL NOT EXPIRE UNTIL AFTER FINAL LAURENCE W. MURPHY PUBLIC ROAD CONSTRUCTION IS COMPLETED. W7409 S.T.H. 65" BELDENVILLE, W( 54003 LQT-1-6 LOT 3 ZONING - AG RES CEEMBEp $4/RV_EY A_ P I ~ERT(F1 Q VOLUME 20, PAGE_5-114 SURVEYMAP LOT WEST 114 CORNER WEST 1/4 CORNER SECTION 34, V_ OLUME 9, PAGE 24¢2 15 / SECTION 33, T 28 N, R 18 W (EAST COR. SEC. 33), T 28 N. R 18 W (FOUND COUNTY BERNTSEN (FOU4V COUNTY SERNTSEN - N 89.24'31" E 5277.44- EAST 114 CORNER ALUMINUM MONUMENT) ALUMINUM MONUMENT) _ N 89°2431" E 820.4T - SECTION / 34, T 28 N, R 18 W Ili 5289.087 - (FOUNDCOUNTYBERNTSEN 4993.94' L- N 89.58.58" E s2es.e8~- tas.3rQ(!_NTY TRUNK_H/~HY~gY IK' ALUMINUM MONUMENT) N 89°58'58" E t N 89°58'58^ E 294.97, N 89.24.31" E - - N 89'24'31" E 569.1 S L-:R- 3 _ = 30.25_Q _ - 31.55:x' 86. ' 1- F w to sECnoN LINE, SEC. 34 N89''24.7_E 480-23' I ~3 86 - - - N 89°3859" E 523.36' 4458. T E-W 114 SECTION W gg•~' E 592.01' - 45.7& $ LINE, SEC. 33 SETBACK LINE Q t - - - - - - O: as JOINTO9 AY EASE, NT S 3 - co Q PIPELINE (SEE NOTE) g m W. UA C7 C-0: LOT 3 NE ' W - - - sET$acKLI~ q 8 263,564 SQ. W FT y 1 z OR 6.051AC. I ~ LOT 4 xi: (248,999 SQ. FT. OR , $ o S Q 311,843 SQ. FT. OR 7.159 AC_ (✓ifj 5.716AC. EXCLUDING f. to L7[; (292, 758 SQ. FT. OR 6.721 AC. a W, °+9 RIGHT OF WAY) I Q EXCLUDING RIGHT OF WA10 V; 4~ S 89'2431" W 480.24' S 89°24.31" W $89.15' ~ UIVPL4TTE0_LAND$ ~~sGONS,•1r NOTES- j AN EROSION CONTROL PLAN WILL BE REQUIRED BY THE ST. CROIX COUNTY ZONING IAVRE OFFICE PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION ON THIS LOT. u P AN EASEMENT WAS ACQUIRED BY GREAT LAKES PIPELINE CO. IN VOLUME 422, PAGE 13 1 AND TRANSFERRED TO WILL DUNS BROTHERS PIPELINE COMPANY IN VOLUME 422, PAGES IJ B LOENVILLE, 164-174. NO WIDTH OR SPECIFIC LOCATION IS SET FORTH IN EITHER DOCUMENT. THE O wi. PIPELINE COMPANY SHOULD BE CONTACTED PRIOR TO THE CONSTRUCTION OF ANY DATED: IMPROVEMENTS NEAR THE PIPELINE. THIS EASEMENT IS A BLANKET EASEMENT. ANY ° J~ JANUARY 27, 2006 OWNER OF LOTS 3 OR 4 ISSUED A BUILDING PERMIT RECOGNIZES THAT THE TOWN OF KINNICKINNIC Lq No PERMISSAB ELOCATION OFR F TTHESTSTRAUCCTTUNRE($) WHETHER SAID PIPELINE MAY AFFECT THE THIS INSTRUMENT DRAFTED BY JERALD L. LARSON SHEET 1 OF 2 1of2 Vol 21 Page 5252 4_ - Wisconsin Department of Commerce SOIL EVALUATION REPORT Page 1 3 Division of Safety and Buildings in accordance with Comm 85, Ws. Adm. Code County St. Croix Attach complete site plan on paper not less than 81/2 x 11 inches in size. Plan must include, but not limited to: vertical and horizontal reference, point.(BM).,. direction and p..1 percent slope, scale or dimensions, north arrow, and location and distance to nearest road. 2 - Q Q Q Please ~ kdonlimfiam Reviewed by - n Date Personal information you provide may be used for secondary purposes (Privacy Law, s. 15.04 (1) (m)). llyr L'aC92iors NW 34 28 Ei~ Ken and Ruth Ann Lee o Lot 1/4 SW 1/4 S T N R 18 E (or) W Property Owner's Maibng Address Lot # oak # Subd. Name or CSM# 21- S ~ N8795 862nd Street 4b Lee t lty state tip Uooe t nxm Number ity E]Village JDTown Nearest oad River Falls 1. WI , 54022 I. ( ) Yinsai,lcisaxiiC 1. 20CTH M New Construction UseEj Residential / Number of bedrooms 3 to 4 Code derived design flow rate 450 to 600 GPD Replacement Public or commercial -Describe: J. Parent material Loess over glacial Till Flood Plain elevation if applicable ~r ft. General comments Site suitable for an A+0 system design only J and recommendations: 1 .State.and:c©unLvv.lavE.conciucted.can: site .evaluation 0 Boring L!~ 19 Pit Ground surface elev. 101.09 ft. Depth to limiting factor lU in. Sal Application -Rate t•.•~.'ra-m.. -.T ,mow"--'.;.-~,;;,~,~ _ •~....,.,..r.-. - , v.,,~:~ ~ ,~..~a, l *Eff#1 'Eff#2 j in. Munsell i Qu. Sz. Cont. Color Gr. Sz. Sh. I _ - 1 11 11 luyrs/z s Imsbk mTr as LY 4 b 2 10-13 tt [t, flM7. 5/8 sil _1=9bk mfr _cw if .4 .6 c2p7.5yr5/8 sicl 2msbk mfr 3 13-24 10yr5/3 4 EE Boring #j Boring 102.85 11 .pit Ground surface elev. ft. Depth to limting factor in. r-- '3ai Application'Rato Horizon Depth Dominant Color Redox Description Texture Structure Consistence Boundary Roots GPD/fP in. Munsell Qu. Sz. Cont. Color Gr. Sz. Sh. *Eff#1 *Eff#2 1 0-8 10yr3/2 - sil 2msbk mfr as 2f .6 .8 2 8-11 _ 1 4/3 - sil 2msbk mfr cam' if •6 8 3 I1-19 10yr4/3 c2d7.5yr518 sicl 2msbk mfr cw if .4 6 4 19-24 10yr4/3 c2p7.5yr5/8 sicl lmsbk mfr - - .2 .3 ~ i 1 I I ~ 1 I 1 I l * Effluent #1 = BOD > 30 < 220 mg/L and TSS >30:5 150 mg/L " Effluent #2 = BOD < 30 mg/L and TSS < 30 mg/L CST Name (Please Print) Signature CST Number Thomas C Nelson 227387 Address Date Evaluation Conducted Telephone Number sz.,.._..IIw t..,....R..~- 7xzr. cLtC 1A6 n.A.Fe. I ..y a. w2 .r 1V/ 1'J//VJ r a.~ rvv--r+..~-r Property Owner Ken and Ruth Ann Lee Parcel ID # Pending Page 2 of 3 ❑ 3 Borin # Boring g Q Pit Ground surface elev. 101.15 ft Depth to limiting factor 8 in. Soil Application Rate Horizon Depth Dominant Color Redox Description Texture Structure Consistence Boundary Roots GPD/ff in. Munsell Qu. Sz. Cont. Color Gr. Sz. Sh. *Eff#1 *EM12 1 0-8 10yr3/2 - sil 2msbk mfr as 2f .6 .8 2 8-10 10w4/4 fIf7.5 5/8 sicl 2msbk mfr cw 1f .4 .6 3 10-16 10yr4/4 c2d7.5yr5/8 sicl lmsbk mfr cw if .2 .3 4 16-20 10yr4/4 c2p7.5yr5/8 sicl lmsbk mfr - - .2 .3 i I i i i i I I I I i i F-1 Boring # Boring Pit Ground surface elev. ft. Depth to liming factor in. Soil Application rate Horizon Depth Dominant Color Redox Description Texture Structure Consistence Boundary Roots Munsell Qu. Sz. Cont. Color Gr. Sz. Sh. *Eff#l *0102 I I 1 ! I I ~ 1 I I ~ 1 Boring H Boring fl # Pit Ground surface elev. ft. Depth to limiting factor in. Sal ication Rate Horizon Depth Dominant Color Redox Description Texture Structure Consistence Boundary Roots PD/f? in. Munsell Qu. Sz. Cont. Color Gr. Sz. Sh. *Eff#1 *Eff#2 * Effluent #1 = BOD, > 30 < 220 mg/L and TSS >30 < 150 mg/L * Effluent #2 = BOD, < 30 mg/L and TSS < 30 mg/L The Dcpartincm of Commerce is an cqual opportunity scrvicc'providerand- employer. If you nccd assistancc to access scrviccs or need material in an alternate format, please contact the department at 608-266-3151 or TTY 608-264-8777. SBD4330Tek (8.07/00) Ken Lee Scale 1" = 30' BM1 top of iron pipe 100.00' Lot 4 BM2 top of iron pipe 99.85' 131 101.09' B2 102.85' B3101.15' N04 110.26' BM1 B1 135' 1 .42' 168' B2 4% slope f 128' 73' 139' B3 16' BM2 102.77' SW Lot comer Thomas C Nelson 102' 227387 > 100' Ken Lee Scale T = 30' BMi bop of iron pipe 100.00' Lot 4 b BM2 trop of iron pipe 99.86' B1 101.09' 8210285' NOO 83101.16' BM1 Approximate mound dimensions 37' by 136' i 81 B g' l 1 .42' t B 11' wide diversion ditch with 5`'1 side slues Purpose of diverting surface water from the 4% lope back side of the mound. This ditch traverses the contour line and drains NW of the mound - a' 83 A BM2 102.77 SW tot corner Thomas C Nelson 102' 227387 1r 100' A 11~Au g 11' ~g 1' ditch depth 1' ditch bottom u ~ ~ r u. ~ ~ ~ SAFETY AND BUILDINGS DIVISION cofY merce.Wi.g<oV Integrated Services Bureau 13 East Spruce Street Chippewa Falls, WI 54729 n INSPECTION REPORT www.commerce.wi.gov/sb s c o!■ sin (715) 726-2544 Department of Commerce Date of Inspection: December 13, 2005 Plumber Name and Address RECEIVED Project Name: Lee Property NA Use: Residential JAN 1, 2 2006 Legal Description: NW, SW, 34, 28, 18W Site Number: iX COUNTY Subdivision: Proposed Certified Soil Tester Name a AcIldr". Municipality: Town of Kinnickinnic Thomas Nelson, CST County: St. Croix 1432 120th Street New Richmond, WI 54017 Plan Transaction Number: Sanitary Permit Number: Owner Name and Address: Ken and Ruth Lee Wastewater Flow: 450 gpd each site N8795 862nd Street Persons Present: T. Nelson, P. Quinn, River Falls, WI 54022 Owner An onsite soils verification was conducted at the above referenced site as per district policy for all sites with less than four inches of unsaturated soil below the bottom of the A horizon. The intent of this investigation is to confirm initial observations by the certified soil tester (CST) relating to the presence or absence of redoximorphic features in the A horizon and/or subsoil. In-situ soil texture, structure, and consistence factors were also reviewed as they relate to wastewater application rates. Other site conditions such as percent and direction of slope, landscape position, land surface contour length, and surface water hydrology may also be noted and their effects are factors considered in the recommendations and conclusions portion of this report. Several lots were reviewed for potential interpretative determinations. A typical soil profile may be described as follows: Lot 3 Near CST B-1. B-3 Frozen Soil boring 1 has a thick A horizon and 5Y 5/4 c immediately below the A horizon. Lot 4 Near CST B-1 00-08" 10YR 2/2 sil, 1csbk, mfr, aw. 08-10" 10YR 2/2 sil, 1 msbk, mfr, as. 10-14" 10YR 4/4 sil, 2msbk, mfr, cw, w/ f2f 10YR 4/6 rmfs, few 10YR 6/3 silt coatings on ped surfaces. 14-21" 10YR 4/4 sicl,. 2msbk, mfr, c2f-d 10YR 4/6 and 5/2 rmfs, few 10YR 6/3 silt coatings. Lot 5 In Area of Soil Test This area has similar soil conditions as Lot 4. It is my opinion that soil conditions at Lot 3 would be difficult to justify as suitable without direct observation of seasonal high water levels. Therefore, it is recommended that soil saturation monitoring (groundwater level monitoring) be conducted pursuant to Comm 85.60(3), Wis. Adm. Code, to establish the highest level of seasonal soils saturation. If a mound system is designed to overcome limitations of a high level of seasonal soil saturation and slow permeability on lots 4 and 5, the linear loading rate should not exceed 4.5 gpd/ft and the basal wastewater application rated should not exceed 0.2 gpd/ft2. The additional basal area will partially compensate for the gentle land slope and prevent wastewater leakage at the mound toe. At least 30 inches of sand lift is recommended when applying septic tank effluent to the distribution cell of the mound to ensure proper treatment. The longest portion of the mound must be orientated along the contour. The mound shall be constructed to divert surface Page 2 December 13, 2005 Lee Site water around the mound structure as much as possible. In addition, an up slope drainage ditch should be considered if it is determined that surface or subsurface hydrology is improved by intercepting water and diverting it away from the mound site. I If there are any questions regarding this report, please contact me. - - I i Leroy G. nsky, tewate Specialist cc: ® County ❑ Plumber Ljansky@commerc .state.w . s E-mail © CST ❑ Owner 715/726-2544 Voice 715/7 6-2549 Fax ❑ Other RECEIVED wsconsinDepartment fcomAl PP Q 3 2006 IL EVALUATION REPORT Page 1 of 3 Division of safety and ildings in accords 85 Wis. Adm. Code ST. CROIX COUNTY County St. Croix Attach complete site an on paper not less than 812 x 1 ches i ize. n must include, but not limite a po BM), and Parcel I.D. Pending percent slope, scale or dimensions, north arrow, and location an fence nearest road. Please print all information. Revi y .Date Personai information you provide may be used for secondary purposes (Privacy Law, s. 15.04 (1) (m)). Property Owner Property Location Ken and Ruth Ann Lee Govt. Lot NW 1/4 SW 1/4 S 3 T 28 N R 18 E (or) Property Owner's Mailing Address # Block # Subd. Name or CSM# N8795 862nd Street 4b Lee City State Zip Code Phone Number [:]village Town Nearest Road River Falls WI 54022 ( ) CTH M New Construction Useo Residential / Number of bedrooms 3 to 4 Code derived design flow rate 450 to 600 GPD Replacement Public or commercial - Describe: Parent material Loess over glacial Till Flood Plain elevation if applicable NA ft. General comments Site suitable for an A+0 system design only and recommendations: State ancounty ave con uct on-site eva nation ❑ Boring # 11 Boring I Q Pit Ground surface elev. 101.09 ft, Depth to limiting factor 10 in. Soil ication Rate Horizon Depth Dominant Color Redox Description Texture Structure Consistence Boundary Roots GPDtff in. Munseil Qu. Sz. Cont. Color Gr. Sz. Sh. 'Eff#1 'Eff#2 1 0-10 10yr3/2 sil lmsbk mfr as 2f .4 .6 2 10-13 10 5/3 f1f7,.5yT5/8 sil Inisbk mfr cw If .4 .6 3 13-24 10yr5/3 c2p7.5yr5/8 sicl 2msbk mfr - - .4 .6 2 I El Boring # ® Boring 102.85 11 Pit Ground surface elev. ft. Depth to limiting factor in. Soil Application Rate Horizon Depth Dominant Color Redox Description Texture Structure Consistence Boundary Roots GPD/fF in. Munsell Qu. Sz. Cont. Color Gr. Sz. Sh. •Eff#1 "Eff#2 1 0-8 10yr3/2 sil 2msbk mfr as 2f .6 .8 2 8-11 1 4/3 sil 2msbk mfr cw if .6 .8 3 11-19 10yr4/3 c2d7.5yr5/8 sicl 2msbk mfr cw if .4 .6 4 19-24 10yr4/3 c2p7.5yr5/8 sicl lmsbk mfr - - .2 .3 Effluent #1 = BOD > 30:5 220 mg/L and TSS >30 < 150 mg/L ` Effluent #2 = BOD < 30 mg/L and TSS < 30 mg/L CST Name (Please Print) Signature CST Number Thomas C Nelson 227387 Address Date Evaluation Conducted Telephone Number 1432 120th Street, New Richmond, WI 10/15/05 715-246-2454 N Property Owner Ken and Ruth Ann Lee Parcel ID # Pending Page 2 of 3 3 Boring# Boring E] pit Ground surface elev. 101.15 ft Depth to limiting factor 8 in. Sal Application Rate Horizon Depth Dominant Color Redox Description Texture Structure Consistence Boundary Roots GPDflF in. Munsell Qu. Sz. Cont. Color Gr. Sz. Sh. *Eff#1 *002 Y 1 0-8 10yr3/2 - sil 2msbk mfr as 2f .6 .8 2 8-10 1 Ovr4/4 ftf7.5 5/8 sicl 2msbk mfr cw if .4 .6 3 10-16 10yr4/4 c2d7.5yr5/8 sicl lmsbk mfr cw if .2 .3 4 16-20 10yr4/4 c2p7.5yr5/8 sicl lmsbk mfr - - .2 .3 F-1 Boring # Boring Pit Ground surface elev. ft. Depth to limiting factor in. Soil Application Rate Horizon Depth Dominant Color Redox Description Texture Structure Consistence Boundary Roots GPD/f in. Munsell Qu. Sz. Cont. Color Gr. Sz. Sh. *011#1 *0102 Boring # Boring F~ H Pit Ground surface elev. ft. Depth to limiting factor in. Soil Application Rate Horizon Depth Dominant Color Redox Description Texture Structure Consistence Boundary Roots GPD/fF in. Munsell Qu. Sz. Cont. Color Gr. Sz. Sh. *Eff#1 "Eff#2 " Effluent #1 = BODS > 30;5 220 mg1L and TSS >30:5 150 mg/L " Effluent #2 = BOD5 < 30 mg1L and TSS < 30 mg/L The Department of Commerce is an equal opportunity service provider and employer. If you need assistance to access services or need material in an alternate format, please contact the department at 608-266-3151 or TTY 608-264-8777. s~~.es~T~c ~r o7,00) i Ken Lee Scale 1" = 30' BM1 top of iron pipe 100.00' 4 BM2 top of iron pipe 99.85' Lot 4 81 101.09' 82 102.85' B3 101.15' Nort 110.26 BM 1 B1 135' 1 .42' 168' B2 4% slope 128' 73' 139' B3 16' BM2 1 112.77' SW Lot comer Thomas C Nelson 102' 227387 7~ 100'