The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About022-2001-20-500 (2) RECEIVED WisoonsinDepartment of N 1 6 2006 OIL ION REPORT Page 1 of 3 Division of Safety and Bui ings LS T. CR10 I"P Ff Comm 85, Wis. Adm. Code County ST. CROIX Attach complete site pia less than 81/2 x 11 inches in size. Plan must include, but not limited to: vertical and horizontal re renoe point (BM), direction and Parcel I.D. ff percent slope, scale or dimensions, north arrow, and location and distance to nearest road. r Please print all information. Reviewed bbyy~01-V Personal information you provide may be used for secondary purposes (Privacy Law, s. 15.04 (1) (m))- n : ~L V Property Owner Property Location r 5; t/ C D 3-) GLENN & TERA WACHTLER Govt. Lot NW 1/4 NE 1/4 S 35 T 28 N R 18 E (or) W Property Owner's Mailing Address Lot # Block # Subd. Name or Ma$ 81 Ponderosa Drive - 22 ' ( 9 City State Zp Code Phone Number E]City []Village [DTown Nearest Road River Falls, WI 54022 ( 715 ) 426 - 1172 Halo Drive Q New Construction User Residential / Number of bedrooms 3 or 4 Code derived design flow rate 450 or 600 GPD ® Replacement Public or commercial - Describe: Parent material loess over till Flood Plain elevation if applicable TT ft• General comments interpretive determination required for no A +4 horizon. See report. and recommendations: Mound System 2.50 ft. sand fill 0.2 loading rate Boring F 171 Boring # Q pit Ground surface elev. 105.0Z ft. Depth to limiting factor 8 in. Soil Application Rate Horizon Depth Dominant Color Redox Description Texture Structure Consistence Boundary Roots GPD/ff in. Munsell Qu. Sz. Cont. Color Gr. Sz. Sh. 'Eff#1 'Eff#2 1 0-4 10YR3/2 sil 2fa&sbk mvfr cb 2vf-m 0.6 0.8 2 4-8 10YR3/2 sil 2fa&sbk mfr as lvf-m 0.6 0.8 3 8-19 10YR5/3 m2p10YR5/6&10YR4/2 cl lfabk mfr as lvf--f 0.2 0.3 4 19-24 IOYR5/3 m2p10YR5/6&l0YR4/2 scl Om mefi 0.0 0.0 Horizons 3 & 4 have some gr. Boring # Boring 8 Pit Ground surface elev. 104s 3Z. ft. Depth to limiting factor in. Soil Application Rate Horizon Depth Dominant Color Redox Description Texture Structure Consistence Boundary Roots GPD/ff in. Munsell Qu. Sz. Con± Color Gr. Sz. Sh. 'Eff#1 'Ef1#2 1 0-3 10YR3/2 sil 3fgr mvfr cb 2vf-m 0.6 0.8 2 3-8 sil 2f-ma&sbk mfr as lvf-m 0.6 0.8 3 8-15 10YR5/3 c2flOYR3/4&10YR6/1 cl if-mabk mfr as lvf-m 0.2 0.3 4 15-20 I0YR5/3 m2p10YR5/6&10YR4/2 sc Om mefi 0.0 0.0 Horizons 3 & 4 have some gr; 1 stone. ' Effluent #1 = BOD > 30 < 220 mg/L and TSS >30 < 150 mg/L ' Effluent #2 = BOD < 30 mg/L and TSS < 30 mg/L CST Name (Please Print) Signature CST Number Mary Jo Hollister dzlq~~ s 224832 Address Date Evaluation Conducted Telephone Number W9875 690th Avenue, River Falls, WI 54022 04-15-c to (715) 426 - 1775 r Property Owner WflCHtZ'~t;~~tFnuJ TER}rCt.o-~Z) Parcel ID# Ci'S-M, tNG) Page 2 of 3 Boring ❑ Boring # Ground surface elev. 10*3. YZ ft. Depth to limiting factor 10 Pit in. Soil Application Rate Horizon Depth Dominant Color Redox Description Texture Structure Consistence Boundary Roots GPD in. Munsell Qu. Sz. Cont. Color Gr. Sz. Sh. *Effff1 *01#2 1 04 IOYR3/2 A 2f-msbk mfr cb 2vf-m 0.6 0.8 2 4-10 1 y /2 _ sil 2f-mabk mfr as Ivf-m 0.6 0.8 3 10-18 IOYRS/3 m2d10YR4/6&10YR6/2 cl 1f-mabk mfr aw Ivf-f 0.2 0.3 4 18-25 I OYR5/3 m2 10YR5/6& 10YR4/2 c Om mefi - 0.0 0.0 Boring # Boring J Pit Ground surface elev. ft. Depth to limiting factor in. Soil ication Rate Horizon Depth Dominant Color Redox Description Texture Structure Consistence Boundary Roots GPD/ff in. Munsell Qu. Sz. Cont. Color Gr_ Sz. Sh. *Eff#1 *Eff#2 a Boring # S Boring Pit Ground surface elev. ft. Depth to limiting factor in. Sal Application Rate Horizon Depth Dominant Color Redox Description Texture Structure Consistence Boundary Roots GPD/ff in. Munsell Qu. Sz. Cont. Color Gr. Sz. Sh. *Eff#1 *Eff#2 Effluent #1 = BODS > 30 < 220 mg/L and TSS >30 < 150 mg/L ` Effluent #2 = BODS < 30 mg/L and TSS < 30 mg/L The Department of Commerce is an equal opportunity service provider and employer. If you need assistance to access services or need material in an alternate format, please contact the department at 608-266-3151 or TTY 608-264-8777. SBD-6330Tet (8.07/00) r Plot Plan for Site and Soil Evaluation Page 3 of 3 a Property Owner AA(-* r L~R, --j-9 1"=40ft. Legal Description nty)Y4 of -rye &"0 -:,w. ~S. (cc4W where noted) 'T2-'9 K) IZ%t ~ -ro.y,J of t-t NN ter, w1 VS IC, 5T, a R[2uc D = Backhoe pit CoUnl-n/ W%SCWSty - North 04°~1~~" y,~~ oa ~~aj~•~'~ P~ ,G 'R-O_W l~llO'E 1tJtL0 Y~Q.\V~ C d StoPtS Of 1 to5.W 0 a 14 CA 2 3 Q 34 Site Location: x a G'.T.~#• MT SE~• ~ /3 RECEIVED F~~+2446 VOL 22 PAVE 5341 FEB 2 6 2007 KATRLTEN H_ REGISTER OF DEEDS ST. CROIX Co., W1 RECEIVED FOR RECORD ST. CROIX COUNTY 01 / 12/2007 08:OOAM SURVEYOR'S RECORD CERTIFIED SURVEY MAP REC FEE: 13.00 PAGES: CERTIFIED SURVEY MAP COPY FEE: 3.00 Glenn and Tera Wachtler Lot 4 of that Certified Survey Map recorded in Volume 16 of St. Croix County Certified Maps, Page 4278, also being part of the Northwest 1/4 of the Northeast 1/4 of Section 35, T 28 N, R 18 W, Town of Kinnickinnic, St. Croix County, Wisconsin Curve Data Nurve 1-21 Radius = 1552.42 North Quarter Comer Central Angle = 03'57'20" Section 35, T 28 N. R 18 W QU'j fi§d S53ruey Map Arc length s 107.18' (Found Bemisen "PK" Nail) yqk 2_I2 P-• R& North line NE 114 I Lan Chord Length =107.15' LOT 1 WT2 C ;fte_d su's~ AJAP _ Fast 2633.54' - - - - Chord Bearing = N 01°41'34" W I ( 35 Tangent Bearing @ 1 = " EAST 6o•~,p7, • North Tine Nor 114 - Vol.1 _ 6 3 P3_49 N 00°1708" E 't- -j NE 1/4 Section 35 - ~ Tangent Bearing Q 2 = 02 t, _ N 03'40'14" W '_-laoQ - ? g6 T-~~ Northeast _578.3 -Comer : m '-2W x'189°4"17 E 9`=--270a_ fL E~dst veway I Section 35• T 28 N. R 18 W ~ I a°} " , j $ (Found Bemfsen Aluminum WT S g 33' 7 r~ 1 5 Ao d I Monument) -"x~„ I -T 2.795 ACRES r OR ° o g 107: T 6 - SLTs r LOT - , LOT 1 ! 3j HER 121,737 SQ. F7-- .3y63 i U; Exi_ • 0-72 374.98' o 2285ACRES fL h ( r • x M i 99.520 SO- FT O 0'•'82 56'02" 1'1'406.68 200.00 p (ExCL RAND rON891 '=7"E 4 7-~ ' T 5 O° JOT 2.521 ACRES 17.5011 ARCRES 17.235 ACRES AA k OR , a 109,809 SQ. FT OR v^ a 762,345 SQ. FT 750,762 SQ. FT 2.285 ACRES a 1ty J (EXCL R419 S PG i~w~• M ! Q tq F'i 99.520 OR o' (JCCL wQ'~IOY o, s Q. FT 710.32• 72 RAM N 0'0 -fem. I ( ors . 83° 3' r w 74399• S t~ti ~t N o~ W 1lllefl♦ z y z 9.474 ACRES 8-975ACRES OR OR 412,682 SQ. FT 390,945 SQ. FT. i 33 (EXCL RAM un :i m i Sorts line NW 114 - ..171 y~ OG; ' o~ • NE 114 Sedbn 35 W. ~1 687.26 '279.04. 1 Z 6 a ' 628.8 ' _ a: ---S89°6346^W iw6.ii'--- l1NPIA7TED JA- NVS SURVEYOR SADDRESS W7_409 SM "65"1BOX4.2 South Quarter Comer Beldenville, 1471.54003 Section 35, T 28 N, R 18 W OWNIILS'ADDRESS (Found Bemtsen Aluminum Monument) NOT E- 82 Ponderosa Drive An erosion control plan will be River Falls, W. 54o22 required by the St. Croix N County Zoning Office prior to construction on these lots. LEGEND .tbs. orrS :'t' p Indicates 1 "O.D. x 18" Iron Pipe Set • • • W E (Min. WL -1.131bs.Ain. ft.) : 1 ,,U 2YCE 0 Found 1" Iron Pipe 1KCT`r~inr t S47-3 i 0 Section Corner Monument *1,: sLDE~LLE:: a 5 (as noted) wr. , Scat in Feet 1 =300' - x - Indicates Fence - 300 p > nr1 n 9 39 0 A Indicates Soil Boring Bearings are referenced to the North line of the NE 114 of Section 35, assumed bearing East Indicates Proposed Dated: September 8, 2006 This Instrument drafted by Mark W. Peavey Driveway Location SHEET 1 OF 2 1o12 Vol 22 Page 5341 1 Parcel 022-2001-20-500 03/03/2008 12:36 PM PAGE 1 OF 1 Alt. Parcel 35.28.18.546D-50 022 - TOWN OF KINNICKINNIC Current X ST. CROIX COUNTY, WISCONSIN Creation Date Historical Date Map # Sales Area Application # Permit # Permit Type 01/12/2007 00 0 Tax Address: Owner(s): O = Current Owner, C = Current Co-Owner O - WACHTLER, GLENN M & TERA L GLENN M & TERA L WACHTLER 81 PONDEROSA RD RIVER FALLS WI 54022 Districts: SC = School SP = Special Property Address(es): Primary Type Dist # Description ' 1353 HALO DR SC 4893 RIVER FALLS SP 0100 CHIP VALLEY VOTECH Legal Description: Acres: 2.795 Plat: 5341-CSM 22-5341 022-07 SEC 35 T28N R1 8W NW NE PT LOT 4 CSM Block/Condo Bldg: LOT 05 16-4278 NKA LOT 5 CSM 22-5341 Tract(s): (Sec-Twn-Rng 401/4 1601/4) 35-28N-18W NW NE Notes: Parcel History: Date Doc # Vol/Page Type 01/12/2007 842448 22/5341 CSM 07/23/1997 1141/121 WD 07/23/1997 999/407 WD 2008 SUMMARY Bill Fair Market Value: Assessed with: 0 Valuations: Last Changed: 02/21/2007 Description Class Acres Land Improve Total State Reason Totals for 2008: General Property 0.000 0 0 0 Woodland 0.000 0 0 Lottery Credit: Claim Count: 0 Certification Date: Batch Specials: User Special Code Category Amount Special Assessments Special Charges Delinquent Charges Total 0.00 0.00 0.00 Section III - Zoning Board Decision Process D. Names and addresses of the owners of all lands within a specified distance of the property as they appear on the current records of the Register of Deeds, to be used to provide notice of the hearing E. Other pertinent information as requested by the zoning administrator to determine if the proposal complies with the ordinance i F. The required review fee An applicant has the burden of establishing the need for their relief from the zoning ordinance and the zoning board cannot guess or fill in the blanks of an incomplete application. Thus, an applicant fails to provide sufficiently detailed materials at his or a her own peril. If the zoning board determines that it does not have sufficient information to make a decision on an application, it may postpone the decision until the applicant supplies the requested information and notice is provided for an additional hearing. For examples of applications to the zoning board, staff reports, and zoning board decisions, see Appendix D and E. Who reviews the applications? Initially, zoning staff members review the application to identify missing or problematic information. They may also ask other specialists, such as engineers or natural resource specialists, to assist in reviewing issues such as erosion control, stormwater management, delineation of ordinary high water marks, floodplains and wetlands, or restoration issues. Are zoning staff reports recommended and what do they contain? While Wisconsin Statutes do not specifically address staff reports for the zoning board, the courts have not reacted negatively to staff providing recommendations to the zoning board.90 Figures 12 and 13 show the results from a 2004 survey completed by 31 counties. Most zoning staff members prepare reports some or all of the time for zoning board members, summarizing the facts regarding applications. About half of the counties who responded Miswald v. Waukesha County Bd. ofAdjustment, 202 Wis.2d 401, 550 N.W.2d 434 (Ct. App. 1996) 56 ~ f Safety and Buildings 13 E SPRUCE STREET commercemi.gov CHIPPEWA FALLS WI 54729 TDD (608) 264-8777 I n s in www.commerce.wi.gov/sb/ Department of Commerce www.wisconsin.gov Jim Doyle, Governor Mary P. Burke, Secretary June 12, 2006 CUST ID No. 224832 ATTN: POWTS Inspector MARY JO HOLLISTER ZONING OFFICE HOLLISTERS SOIL TESTING ST CROIX COUNTY SPIA W9875 690TH AVE 1101 CARMICHAEL RD RIVER FALLS WI 54022-4011 HUDSON WI 54016 CONDITIONAL APPROVAL PLAN APPROVAL EXPIRES: 06/12/2008 Identification Numbers Transaction ID No. 1266999 SITE: Glenn & Tera Wachtler Site ID No. 712272 Town of Kinnickinnic, St Croix County Please refer to both identification numbers, NW 1/4, NE 1/4, S35, T28N, R18W above, in all correspondence with the agency. FOR: Object Type: Soil Saturation Determination Regulated Object ID No.: 1073517 The submittal described above has been reviewed for conformance with applicable Wisconsin Administrative Codes and Wisconsin Statutes. The submittal has been CONDITIONALLY APPROVED. The owner, as defined in chapter 101.01(10), Wisconsin Statutes, is responsible for compliance with all code requirements. The following conditions shall be met during construction or installation and prior to occupancy or use: 1. Approval is hereby granted pursuant to s. Comm 85.60(2), Wis. Adm. Code, to estimate the depth to seasonal soil saturation based on an interpretive determination process. Approval of the interpretive determination negates the requirement in s. Comm 85.30(2)(b), Wis. Adm. Code to designate the ground surface as the highest level of soil saturation when redoximorphic features are less than 4 inches below the bottom of the A horizon. 2. The estimated highest level of prolonged soil saturation approved under this determination is 6 inches below grade. At least 30 inches of sand lift on top of 6 inches of unsaturated, in-situ soil is required for adequate treatment and dispersal. 3. The basal soil application rate for the mound shall be <0.2 gpd/sf, and the linear loading rate :5 4.0 gpd/ft. 4. Chisel plowing to a depth of > 12 inches immediately prior to sand placement is required to improve vertical water movement into the soil solum. 5. Landscaping up slope of the mound shall be incorporated into the POWTS design to prevent surface water from concentrating along the up slope edge of the mound and to divert surface water drainage away from the system. A shallow drainage swale would be acceptable for this purpose since simply landscaping the mound may not be adequate. 6. This approval shall remain valid unless the site is altered in such a way that the depth to soil saturation would change or if saturated conditions are observed for seven consecutive days at depths less than 3 feet below the infiltrative surface of the POWTS distribution component. 7. This approval in no way relinquishes the use of color patterns to estimate the depth to high groundwater on any other parcels or portions of parcels. 8. A copy of this approval letter and attachments must accompany the mound system design for this site for purposes of plan approval and sanitary permit issuance. If the Interpretive Determination Report was accompanied with a plan and an expiration date is shown on this letter, the expiration date only applies to the plans for the design, not to the decision on the Interpretive Determination Report. r MARY JO HOLLISTER Page 2 6/12/2006 A copy of the approved plans, specifications and this letter shall be on-site during construction and open to inspection by authorized representatives of the Department, which may include local inspectors. If plan index sheets were submitted in lieu of additional full plansets, a copy of this approval letter and index sheet shall be attached to plans that correspond with the copy on file with the Department. All permits required by the state or the local municipality shall be obtained prior to commencement of construction/installation/operation. If this construction project will disturb one or more acres of land, an Erosion Control Notice of Intent (NOI) shall be filed with the department 14 days prior to any earth disturbing activities. In granting this approval the Division of Safety & Buildings reserves the right to require changes or additions should conditions arise making them necessary for code compliance. As per state stats 101.12(2), nothing in this review shall relieve the designer of the responsibility for designing a safe building, structure, or component. Inquiries concerning this correspondence may be made to me at the telephone number listed below, or at the address on this letterhead. Sincerely, Fee Required $ 100.00 Fee Received $ 100.00 Balance Due $ 0.00 Leroy G. nsky, W tewater p cialist Integrated Services Bureau WiSMART code: 7633 (715) 726-2544 Phone (715) 726-2649 Fax Ijansky@commerce.state.wi.us Mary Jo Hollister W9875 69o'k Avenue RECEIVED River Falls, Wl 5+022 (715) +26 17757 Fax: +26 - +827 JUN 0 5 2006 Interpretative Determination Report SAFETY & BUILDINGS 25 APril 2006 12 6 6 9 9 9 P.®.W.T.s. Property Owner: GLr-NN & Tr-RA WACHTLr.R Conditionally Location: of the '/4 ec. 28 1 8 APPROVED W, NW'/+ NE , S 55, T N, R DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE Town of Kinnickinnic, 5t. Croix County, Wisconsin DIVI ION Of SAFETY AND BUILDINGS SEE C RRESP DENCE INTRODUCTION: On 15 April 2006 a site and soil evaluation was completed fora proposed three lot Certified .ciurveu Map. Previously, three lots were approved to the north and the east of the proposed lots with potentially nine future lots from the original forty acres. One dwelling was on the original forty acres. (see attached survey map and the Site andjoil E-valuation Report.) The initial determination 6y this soil tester found that there is no clear A +4 distance to seasonal saturation as required 6y Comm 85.50 (2) Wisconsin Administrative Code for location of new soil absorption systems. An Interpretative Determination Report is required in lieu of groundwater monitoring to verify that the highest level of soil saturation is greater than six inches and that the level of saturation may not 6e less than six inches for seven consecutive days. GEOLOGICAL HISTORY: As we know, this area in Wisconsin is an area of the Glaciated Region of which the last rage 2 - Wachtler occurred 12,000 to 15,000 years ago. 'This caused erosion, deposition, stream erosion and other processes. Wisconsin is divided into five natural regions2 which are related to land 6.9 the use of plants, animals and 6.9 man. Also the boundaries are determined 6.9 soil texture and structure in the underlying rocks. 5t. Croix County is located in the Western (Apland which is underlain by Ordovician dolomites. 3 This part of 5t. Croix County was formed 6.9 ground moraine deposits from the Wisconsin stage of deposition. The parent material at this site is loess overglacial till. LOCAL HYDROLOGY: This land area is located within theft. Croix }liver E)asin which includes the Apple, Willow and KinnicLinnic Rivers and several small creeks. 4 A tributary of the Kinnickinnic River is located approximately one mile due north and flows at a northwesterly direction and another one is located one mile due west and flows at a southerly direction. fart of the Kinnickinnic River is located one-half mile southeasterly and flows southwest. Much of the groundwater is recharged from rainfall and possi6ly the tributaries of the Kinnickinnic River. The attached topographic map from thejtate of Wisconsin Geological and Natural history `survey shows the land thirteen feet higher than the two drainage areas that surround the proposed area. The drainage areas do appear to carry water. ' Martin, L. (1965) The Physical Geology of Wisconsin. University of Wisconsin Press, Madison, Wisconsin. 2 Martin, L. (1965) The Physical Geology of Wisconsin. University of Wisconsin Press, Madison, Wisconsin. s Martin, L. (1965) The Physical Geology of Wisconsin. University of Wisconsin Press, Madison, Wisconsin. 4 St. Croix County Development Management Plan; Physical Features Analysis, pg. 2-11. Page 4 - Wachlter According to the 5t. Croix County map for depths to groundwater, this area is mapped at greater than 75 feet. (Map enclosed.) The surface water flow is apparently straight down into the A horizon which may 6e perched in the g horizon as indicated 6y the redoximorphic features. The drainage from the site appears to flow away from the site in three directions as indicated on the topography map. The slope at the sites are all linear and convex and positioned and the shoulder of the hillslope. Located to the north of borings 1 through 4 are two mound systems and another mound system was installed to the south for the original dwelling on the forty. The elevations at the two sites to the north are approximately the same elevation and mapped as the same soils. The system to the south is much lower and mapped as 5ky6erg silt loam. Three pits were dug west of 6orings 1 through 4 which had redoximprphic conditions in the A horizon and within one pit water was observed at 24 inches. These pits are located 1 00 to 300 ft. to the west and at lower elevations. CONCLUSION: The landscape at this site shows the water movement away from the tested areas. These soils will properly accept and treat the wastewater with a long and narrow mound system. Due to the lack of redoximorphic features in the top eight inches, there is adequate depth of eight inches before the soils become saturated for any length of time. RECOMMENDATIONS 1 The depth of the approved sand 6e at least 2.50 feet for adequate treatment and dispersal. 2.) The mound system 6e designed long and narrow with a linear loading rate of 4.0 gpd/ft. and the basal soil application rate shall 6e 0.2 gpd/4.2. Page 5 - Wachlter 3.) Chisel plowing to a depth of 12 inches immediately prior to sand Placement. 4.) increase the slope areas around the mound system to increase absorption area. 5.) Surface water is to 6e diverted from the mound system with either a grass-way diversion or upslope area of mound system designed with a greater slope. }zespectfully submitted, Mary Jo Hollister, C5T 224832 Revised: 24 May 2006) I I ~I KuE RE.NCE S: 1.) Martin, L. (1 965)• The rk sc{ ical 6eo12of Wisconsin. University of Wisconsin Press, Madison, Wisconsin. 2.) Sons. University of Wisconsin education Courses. 5.),5t. Croix County Development Plan. Volume Two; background Studies. Physical Features Analeys;s. 4.) Soil Survey of St. Croix County (1 978)• United States Department of Agriculture Soil Conservation Service and Kesearcl, Division of tke College of Agriculture and Life Sciences, University of Wisconsin. L