HomeMy WebLinkAbout026-1165-25-000 (2)
WiisconsinDepartment ofCommerce SOIL EVALUATION REPORT Page of3
Division of Safety and Buildings
in accordance with Comm 85, Wis. Adm. Code County
Attach complete site plan on paper not less than 8 112 x 11 inches in size. Plan must
include, but not limited to: vertical and horizontal reference point (BM), direction and Parcel I.D. ,'ll
percent slope, scale or dimensions, north arrow, and location and distance to nearest road. 2611 V
ew ~
.,,~fint.all information..,....;
Please D
Personal information you provide may be used for secondary purposes (Pripacy Law, s. 15.04 (1) (m)). `
Property Owner Property Location
Govt. Lot 1/ 1/4 S T N R E LOG
Property Owners Mai ' Address Lot # Block # Subd. Name or M#
~ %fL 'a' CL
City tate p Code Phone Nurllbpr.._-.. 11 City ❑ Village ~-rq~V Nearest Road
New Construction Us A Residential /Number of bedroom Code derived design flow rate r•~~ GPD
❑ Replacement Public ormmeercial - Describe: - -
Parent material 21~Flood Plain elevation if applicable
General comments
47
and recommendations: le /V--/ / '
Boring
Boring v
# l_t/ft. Depth to limiting factor in.
Pit Ground surface elev /f
Sol Application Rate
Horizon Depth Dominant Color Redox Description Texture Structure Consistence Boundary Roots GPD/fF
in. Munsell Qu. Sz. Cont. Color Gr. Sz. Sh. 'Eff#1 'Eff#2
O-Zb
old
Boring # Q Boring
® /Mo(~ Pit Ground surface ele~~j tt• Depth to limiting fact or in.
Soil Application Rate
Horizon Depth Dominant Color Redox Description Texture Structure Consistence Boundary Roots GPD/ff
in. Munsell Qu. Sz. Cont. Color Gr. Sz. Sh. 'Eff#1 'Eff##2
-D S
G~
~ ) J
Effluent #1 = BOD > 30 < 220 mg/L and TSS >30 150 mg/L ' Effluent #2 = BOD < 30 mg/L and TSS < 30 mg/L
CST Name (Please Print) Signal CST Number
Bird Plumbing, Inc. Shaun Bird 226900
Address Date Evaluation Conducted Telephone Number
1008 192nd Ave, New Richmond, WI 54017- _ O 715-246-4516
Property Owner _ Parcel ID # Page of
❑ Boring # ❑ Boring 3 A pit Ground surface elev.. Depth to limiting factor zii~_, in.
Soil iication Rate
Horizon Depth Dominant Color Redox Description Texture Structure Consistence Boundary Roots GPDfT
in. Munsell Qu. Sz. Cont. Color Gr. Sz. Sh. 'Eff#1 'Eff#2
r~~~ - SL ~Cf,,
k, J44
S
rITO'
S
a Boring # ❑ Boring
❑ Pit Ground surface elev. ft. Depth to limiting factor in- Soil licetion Rate
Horizon Depth Dominant Color Redox Description Texture Structure Consistence Boundary Roots GPDM
in. Munsell Qu. Sz. Cont. Color Gr. Sz. Sh. •Eff#1 'Eff#2
❑
Boring # Boring Ground surface elev. ft, Depth to limiting factor in.
❑ Pit Soil Application Rate
Horizon Depth Dominant Color Redox Description. Texture Structure Consistence Boundary Roots •Efl#GPD/f*Eff#2
in. Munsell Qu. Sz. Cont. Color Gr. Sz. Sh.
• Effluent #1 = BOD, > 30 5 220 mg1L and TSS >30 5150 mgll. • Effluent #2 = BOD, 5 30 mglL and TSS 30 mglL
The Department of Commerce is an equal opportunity service provider and employer. If you need assistance to access services or
need material in an alternate format, please contact the department at 608-266-3151 or TTY 608-264-8777.
sao-e330ta.em0>
it
I
4-406
Soil Test Plot Plan
Project Name William Stock/Steve Dalton Shaun
Address 1748 112th St.
New Richmond Wi 54017 CS #226900
Lot 25 Subdivision Lundy Meadows Date 8/11/03
N 1 /2 SE 1/4S 22 T 30 N/1318 W Township Richmond
n Boring Q Well PL Property Line County ST. CROIX
BM or VRP Assume Elevation 100 ft. Top of Survey Iron
System Elevation 97.2/96.9 *HRPSame as Benchmark
Alt. BM Top of 2" Pipe @a 100.2'
I
Scale is 1" = 40'
unless otherwise
noted
a
N
M
101' Please note: Installer must
verify all lot lines and setbacks
B-2 before installation.
90' Please Note: Tested area
4% may not be suitable for
1 B-3 desired building area.
Check system location
before excavating.
5'
B-1 30'
30'
*Alt. B.M.
'D A If
40' 239' Property Line
AST. CROIX COUNTY
WISCONSIN
ZONING DEPARTMENT
M N N M N~~~r ST. CROIX COUNTY GOVERNMENT CENTER
- - 1101 Carmichael Road
Hudson, WI 54016-7710
Phone: (715) 386-4680 Fax (715) 386-4686
Memo to File
From: Pam Quinn
Date: 4/15/2004
Re: Sandy loam structure misinterpretation on subdivision soil reports
Recent soil on-site determinations have brought a problem to our attention. During these on-
sites, borings were excavated to confirm soil conditions where two conflicting soil reports had
been submitted for zoning department review. The soil profiles, evaluated by myself, Dave
Fogerty, and Dave Steel (all certified soil testers) differed from the original soil reports in that
massive (structureless) sandy loams were encountered in horizons that were described as having
either moderate, medium subangular blocky (2msbk) structure by Adam Schumaker or weak,
medium ranular structure (1 mgr) by Sh_ aunJ3ird.. There apparently has been a
irri-sunderstanding between "structure" caused by handling samples of the soil during texturing
versus the soil characteristics in situ. The soil, when chunks were taken out of the profile to hand
texture, parted into "crumbs" that appeared at first to be subangular or granular in shape.
However, these were not true peds that broke apart along planes of weakness, but fragments
created by handling. The soil when observed in the horizon did not have distinct units of
structure and should have been reported as "massive".
Massive sandy loams have been assigned a soil application rate of 0.2 gpd/ft2 with the code
changes in Comm 83.44-2, effective as of 2/1/04. The application rates listed on the soil reports
were higher due to the structure having been described as either weak or moderate, which affects
the calculations for sizing of POWTS distribution cells. Obviously, one of the concerns is to
make sure loading rates for the soils are not in error and allow undersized POWTS to be
installed. For example, in December 2003, Lot 35 of Richmond Meadows subdivision had to
have its loading rate reduced to 0.3 gpd/sq. ft. when the installer encountered massive sandy
loam at the system elevation. The sandy loam horizon had been described on the soil report as
"I mgr" with firm consistence.
Leroy Jansky, Dept. of Commerce Regional Wastewater Specialist, has been consulted on this
situation and advised the zoning department to require on-site verifications for any lots with this
potential misinterpretation on the soil reports. All soil reports with this description will be
required to use a design based on the current code's soil application rate for massive sandy loam
@ 0.2 gpd/sq. ft. unless additional soil testing proves otherwise.