Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout026-1147-21-000 (2) ' Wisconsin Department of Commerce SOIL EVALUATION REPORT Page of Division of Safety and Buildings in accordance with Comm 85, Wis. Adm. Code y~ County Attach complete site plan on paper not less.than 8 1/2 x 11 inches in size. Plan must ` include, but not limited to: vertical and hofizbntal'r mt (BM), direction and Parcel I.D. C/ percent slope, scale or dimensions, north alrrow,aRRO ~w nearest road. ~Z ~O-' I7 7 Z~ Y viewed by Date Please print ~11 information. Personal information you provide mjybeusedj1,,.ec1"',1 or sa puc s (Privacy Law, s° 15.04 (1) (m)). / l a AAQ Property Owner roperty Location , / vF y v~ govt. Lot l 1 / A T O N R E (o . W i Property Owner's Mailing Address ICE 'Lot # 4ck # Subd. Name or CSM# City State Zip Code Phone Number ❑ city E] Viitage Town Nearest Road ew construction Us esidential / Number of b Code derived design flow rate E~!✓ GPD ❑ Replacement or commercial - Describe: - ,Jl - - Parent material ✓L~_.~%% Flood Plain elevation if applicable _✓f /J'~ ft. General comments Ax, ✓ c^ ~ 9 4 , Z/ (j / ~f ' N~ ~C+, -Ll and recommendations: M94;f -4.0- 3/ 2~z 3 "i3e ❑ Boring qn Boring # ~ Pit Ground surface elev.--. L ft. Depth to limiting factor ~ in. Soil Application Rate Horizon Depth Dominant Color Redox Description Texture Structure Consistence Boundary Roots GPD/ff in. Munsell Qu. Sz. Cont. Color Gr. Sz. Sh. •Eff#1 •Eff#2 i 0-d /OVI Wz C4 S~ 4/ 2 bk L-v -7 Ll U 3 dr Boring # Boring ® Pit Ground surface elev. ' ft. Depth to limiting factor in. Soil Application Rate Horizon Depth Dominant Color Redox Description Texture Structure Consistence Boundary Roots GPD/ff' in. Munsell Qu. Sz. Cont. Color Gr. Sz. Sh. •Eff#1 •Eff#2 r • Effluent #1 = BOD > 30 < 220 mg/L and TSS >30 < 150 mg/L • Effluent #2 = BOD < 30 rng/L and TSS < 30 mg/L CST ~p "Inc. ) Signa CST Number Bird Plumbing, Shaun Bird 226900 Address Date Evaluation Conducted Telephone Number 1008 192nd Ave, New Richmond, WI 54017 715-246-4516 Property Owner- Parcel ID # Page of Boring # ❑,Boring El~, pit Ground surface elev. ft. Depth to limiting factor ZA7Z in. Soil Application Rate Horizon Depth Dominant Color Redox Description Texture Structure Consistence Boundary Roots GPD/ff in. Munsell Qu. Sz. Cont. Color Gr. Sz. Sh. `Eff#1 •Eff#2 Z y1 r - ❑ sfT/!2 L olliy! t_J - Boring # Boring J F-I c ❑ pit Ground surface elev. ~ft. Depth to limiting factor )n. Soil ~Eplicafion Rate Horizon Depth Dominant Color Redox Description Texture Structure Consistence Boundary Roots GPD/ff in. Munsell Qu. Sz. Cont. Color Gr. Sz. Sh. `Eff#1 `Eff#2 Boring # ❑ Boring F-I ❑ Pit Ground surface elev. ft. Depth to limiting factor in. Soil lication Rate Horizon Depth Dominant Color Redox Description. Texture Structure Consistence Boundary Roots GPD/fP in. Munsell Qu. Sz. Cont. Color Gr. Sz. Sh. •Eff#1 'Eff#2 Effluent #1 = BODE > 30 < 220 mg/L and TSS >30 < 150 mglL ` Effluent #2 = BODS < 30 mglL and TSS < 30 mg/l The Department of Commerce is an equal opportunity service provider and employer. If you need assistance to access services or need material in an alternate format, please contact the department at 608-266-3151 or TTY 608-264-8777. SBD-8330 (8.6/00) ' . Soil Test Plot Plan Project Name Richard Nelson Shaun d Address P.O. Box 10622 White Bear Lake Mn 55110 CS'I` #226900 Lot 21 Subdivision Richmond Meadows Date 7/1/03 NE 1 /4 N W 1 /4S 24 T 30 N/1318 W Township Richmond Boring Q Well PL Property Line County ST. CROIX BM or VRP Assume Elevation 100 ft. Top of Power Box (e tic) System Elevation 96.2/96.0 *HRPSame as Benchmark Alt. BM Top of Telephone Box @ 100.0' Scale is 1" = 40' unless otherwise noted 0 N M M 99' 98' 30' B- 40' 7% Slope -3 35 20' B-2 0' IA .M.g 142nd St. 166.88' ° -NZ -----T-=-_ - - - '=99 - 2 W) ° 459.72' - - -EX. 1-8 CMP - - 1 0 0 I 1. -656.84'- INV~1001.961 EX. 18`CMPi 230.24' - - CO 0 ` S>9.04'34"E INV=10019 RIGHT-OF-'MAY UNE X821 17 I / Iaoo 'p I 1 / 1005,06-1 74541 S Ft - - y I I A~i3` pow r 1.71 Acres y - r i - I BA-1. ?1 ro / 1 20ft. wide 1 I i dp p / drainage easement- J 83788~SeFt / c 1005.85 18 1 20.0 1.92 Grs I l i - I 98685 SqFt JBA- Acr I 1r I 2.27 Acre I 2 es 00 O I48A=Z20 es I ` 00~ I =94.94, n' Sy, CfO l~ •A- . OOH O S r- 1 I 1p~k'#j ~ o ~o I \S d t9 0 I 120 E o X25 93' ~g~~ 5817 27 .220 B22~ 09-00 ' ~d 1~6 B19 - / 1- 19 / X11 b 67225 SqFt / t / ~•p~ y 1.5'4 Acres / 14 N)3 AL --1. 41 Acres / 67920 ~qFt / S?.-0d` / '►j ~R+fr a. o 1.56 A res / JBA=1.56 /Acres 3 Eoft a Z 3 ~RiP. sib. \ ~~11 ° / J r I r~ 15 I O '085 g•4 15 I y ~ V3 .100 00 0729 •2aI 1010.85 c I F Nom' & 20.00 i\ Q I _ f- - _ I 6 8832 SqF • \ ✓ / o0 1.81 Acres 'e. o a, 120ft1 wide '~T o \ N:A drainage easement's / / _ NSA=1.81 Acres . N b q1 '.X ' / 1 I INN 1 \ 70 -10 20 _ '08• 0 lea ~M o 8 66109 SqFt o / 33' 33' rw.g - / g ti 1.52 Acres 105 00. Nf3A=1.06 Acres -15 ~ „ E / - 948 ` 32~ I ° o ~t~ B 1 8~ 3 179.20 4 0 ( N79 5 / n / 452.35. 418.3? -j ?0 cv -dam i o° 00 D I o drainage / N7 1 20~•'t>v54 WlL~' 33 34, 1;55.02• n ^ to utility %0 ) o, easement I E 5 8T/ 4?p 1 87M N7g•48 5 _O 135.21' T( 214.4 02~ ~ W 33.0 Q' N89 35'44`W ~A 33. S790 4°P°44'51" - _ 33, 48'54 E N89*33'44'W o G 1011. ~ f' /52.98, L= 113.30' i Wo / ° RA-_9•,14;50 135.21' o M«/ - , O N - / i / E 99, 0 c 1006.00 / _N , - a) O drainage / O r o & utility ease ° I I o Fwo / 1- " 3 0 .•~S8436'03E meat ° ~00 " cNV a~ ~.~1 i 172.077 N6S 16 > 8.00 / i / / / ^ N ^ F31 8 Go I 7 994 S ' i W I B24 38, / NI I Z 9-44-fl S 70 1-2-17 Ac es 016o p .00 -0 2 21 I I / /NBA=1.67~Acr OD W~ o / X79388 SqFt \ 1 I 1607 SgFt/ Z by-p0~~` ^ / I 1.82 Acres I 2.10 Acres V, 4b' 6~6 no ; r1BA=1.05 Acres / /NBA=2.08 '4cres / i o,OI~ Ftp.y'S ~s • r / / O ~yp ,y.,~ /i i C~ ~ ~ ~ I~ 587~2'40"~ 3 ---s►1 i 1~~2 N o / X332.68 r,) yr Alt 0) r- r / ST. CROIX COUNTY WISCONSIN ZONING DEPARTMENT a a a ■ a a~ ST. CROIX COUNTY GOVERNMENT CENTER 1101 Carmichael Road r•~r _ Hudson, WI 54016-7710 Phone: (715) 386-4680 Fax (715) 386-4686 "t Memo to File From: Pam Quinn Date: 4/14/2004 Re: Soil On-site Determinations for Lots 32, 37 & 43 Richmond Meadows Subd. On April 8, 2004 on-site determinations of soil conditions at the above lots was performed to evaluate conflicting soil reports submitted by Adam Schumaker and Shaun Bird. At 11:00 a.m. the weather/lighting conditions were acceptable, with temp. 50°F, clear and. These determinations were requested by the property owner, Orenzo Oevering and the plumber/permit applicant, Dave Fogerty, who were present during the test pit excavations. Additional test pits were located next to borings on the original soil reports to better compare soil conditions in the tested areas. On lot 32 (see attached description) the soil profile contained massive sandy loams at approximately 36 inches below grade, which does not conflict with the soil tester's recommendation for using an at-grade system. What it did reveal, however, is that both Adam and Shaun likely misinterpreted the structure of the sandy loams: Adam called the sandy loam horizon a "2msbk" and Shaun uses "I mgr". There apparently has been a misunderstanding between "structure" caused by handling samples of the soil during texturing versus the soil characteristics in situ. The soil, when chunks were taken out of the profile to hand texture, parted easily into "crumbs" that appeared at first to be subangular or granular in shape. However, these were not true peds that broke apart along planes of weakness, but fragments created by handling. The soil when observed in the horizon did not have distinct units of structure and should have been reported as "massive". Two test pits were evaluated on Lot 37, since the sanitary permit has already been issued. Due to the current house and well location, additional tested area will be required to meet setbacks to the POWTS. A pit closest to Shaun's B2 did have a sandy horizon as reported, but only to a depth of 60", then underlain by a massive sandy loam. Unfortunately, the boundary between the sands and sandy loam horizon was very irregular, with tongues of sandy loam much closer to grade than 60". The recommended loading rate for this site would need to be lowered to adjust for varying pore space at system elevation. Lot 43 had conflicting reports, where Shaun's tested area (near the front of the lot) reported conditions allowing a conventional system and Adam's (closer to the rear of the lot) reported mottling at 32" with a mound system recommendation. Additional test pit B4 was excavated next to Shaun's B3 (see attached description) and massive sandy loams were encountered at 17 inches below grade. Weathered cobbles (break into smaller pieces upon disturbance) and oxidized iron deposits around individual gravel/cobbles were observed in the pit wall, but no mottling was identified to 68". Shaun's B3 description of sandy loam with "2mgr" structure starting at 18", then sandy loam "lmgr" from 36-110". Again, I think there was a misinterpretation of texture after a sample had been handled. Leroy Jansky, Dept. of Commerce Regional Wastewater Specialist, has been consulted on this situation and advised the zoning department to require on-site verifications for any lots with this potential misinterpretation on the reports. Obviously, one of the concerns is to make sure loading rates for the soils are not in error and allow undersized POWTS to be installed. For example, in December 2003, Lot 35 had to have its loading rate reduced to 0.3 gpd/sq. ft. when the installer encountered massive sandy loam at the system elevation. The sandy loam horizon was described on the soil report as "Imgr" with firm consistence. The zoning department will have a note placed on all soil reports with this type of description as requiring a design using the current code's soil application rate for massive sandy loam @ 0.2 gpd/sq. ft. unless additional soil testing proves otherwise. 'Wisconsin Department of Commerce SOIL EVALUATION REPORT Page I of 3 Division of Safety and Buildings in accordance with Comm 85, Wis. Adm. Code County Attach complete site plan on paper not less than 8 1/2 x 11 inches in size. Plan must Ci~01 include, but not limited to: vertical and horizontal reference point (BM), direction and Parcel I.D. percent slope, scale or dimensions, north arrow, and location and distance to nearest road. 0Z.6 //17 21-6Y- Please print all information. Reviewed y Dat Personal information you provide may be used for secondary purposes (Privacy Law, s. 15.04 (1) (m)). v y Property Owner Property Location /O -7f / 2cknrd 1 Govt. Lot I\JE 1/4NIk) 114 S 2 L[ T30 N R /O E (o W Property Owner' Mailing Address Lot # Block # Sub Name or CSM# City State Zip Code Phone Number ❑ City AIlage aTown Nearest Road )O ((D51)-7 8 ~d,I W6 HLPkj\-1-'1 `P New Construction Use: a Residential / Number of bedrooms 3 Code derived design flow rate d GPD ❑ Replacement E] Public or commercial - Describe: Parent material rr ( Flood Plain elevation if applicable ft, General comments 5 ~je(„r\ QI-2 J M and recommendations: 06 ~ V r e I -eV, © goring # t❑~ Boring ~ LL 1 pit Ground surface elev. ~ ft. Depth to limiting factor in ate Horizon Depth Dominant Color Redox Description Tex ture Structure Consistence Boundary Roots GPD/ft2 in. Munsell Qu. Sz. Cont. Color Gr. Sz. Sh. 'Eff#1 'Eff#2 10-9 Lit-21Z c (Y 5 z3 y lb' 10 C -71rY4 L k - Boring # ❑ Boring ® pit Ground surface elev. ft. Depth to limiting factor- in. Soil Application Rate Horizon Depth Dominant Color Redox Description Texture Structure Consistence Boundary Roots GPD/ft2 in. Munsell Qu. Sz. Cont. Color Gr. Sz. Sh. 'Eff#1 'Eff#2 ©-11 12 5. Z --Obk a-~r c v-~ 8 L S; 2rY,`Zbk r - ~,-fig C- 3p 5L 2n~Sb u~ Effluent #1 = GODS > 30 < 220 mg/L and TSS >30 150 mg/L ' Effluent #2 = GODS < 30 mg/L and TSS 30 mg/L CST Name (Please rint) i nature CST Number da tM gc k,ti1 q -e-r _ z s O Address Date Evaluation Conducted Telephone Number SBD-8330 (T707/00) 1 M ~ ' * 1 Parcel ID # Page 2- of Property Owner 1 v I - ❑ Boring F-31 Boring #((jj,/\_\ Pit Ground surface elev. `7V ft. Depth to limiting factor in. Soil Application Rate Horizon Depth Dominant Color Redox Description Texture Structure Consistence Boundary Roots .EGPD/fteE in. Munsell Qu. Sz. Cont Color Gr. Sz. Sh. - 'N 312 s I 2 c S I V C . 5 .9 2 - l y 12 cy CS S 4- -3g (Q SL 2 CS J 5 5L 2 sb~ r~ r - - 5 Boring F-1 Boring # ❑ Pit Ground surface elev. ft. Depth to limiting factor in. Soil Application Rate Horizon Depth Dominant Color Redox Description Texture Structure Consistence Boundary Roots GPD/112 in. Munsell Qu. Sz. Cont. Color Gr. Sz. Sh. 'Eff#1 'Eff#2 ❑ Boring F-1 Boring # Ground surface elev. ft. Depth to limiting factor in. ❑ Pit Soil Application Rate Horizon Depth Dominant Color Redox Description Texture Structure Consistence Boundary Roots GPD/112 in. Munsell Qu. Sz. Cont. Color Gr. Sz. Sh. •Eff#1 'Eff#2 Effluent #1 = BODS > 30 < 220 mg/L and TSS >30 < 150 mg/L ' Effluent #2 = BODS < 30 mg/L and TSS < 30 mg/L The Department of Commerce is an equal opportunity service provider and employer. If you need assistance to access services or need material in an alternate format, please contact the department at 608-266-3151 or TTY 608-264-8777. SBD18330 (R.07/00) PAGE f-) OF 3 NAME u`-eI -SO r~, LOT# Z- I LEGAL DESCRIPTION E X Nw Z 4,S Z y T 3O ,N,R, 19 E(or SCALE: 1"= ~jU BM 1 ELEVATION /00.0 BM 1 DESCRIPTION -~e 6l I " &,,,L,, 4- N-+ BM 2 ELEVATION q9 '-/p t BM 2 DESCRIPTION kp o 140 h o i' p.e -seen ZL/ SYSTEM ELEVATION ALTERNATE ELEVATION NIA- CONTOUR ELEVATION ~I 76 01 VIA I I ~a C~ ~o h v v SIGNATURE ATE