HomeMy WebLinkAbout012-1047-40-000 (2) MEER
ORDINANCE DECISION TREND ANALYSIS
Data Collection/Analysis Would Include:
Initial Data
Computer/Property I.D. # o? T 6( ) ~0
Owner's Name Wqdtl lay1- 5-0-11 0
Property Address 17/-I)A%U- /,n at' &a
Zoning District A2 AG AR RES CO IND
Past Zoning A2 AG AR RES COM IND
Overlay District NONE SHORELA iND WETLAND FLOODPLAIN RIVERWAY
Location Section, Town, Range, of o2 / • 3O • -7
C~~ Cz
Acres 0 3 * U •
Request Date /J- 31- q b"
Disposition DENIED APPROVED WITHDRAWN POSTPONED Date
Activity
Rezoning Varian a ecial Exceptio
Type of Variance/ xception
d1~, A
ROAD/HWY. SETBACK WATER SETBACK BLUFFLINE SETBACK LOT RATIGJ
DRIVEWAY SEPARATION NONCONFORMING LOT SIZE
Ordinance Citation / I V
Supporting Evidence Description
PLOT MAP/PLAN CI E PLAN OWN APPROVAL LTR SM PHOTO MAPS SOIL TEST
Hardship YES NO
Linked to Rezoning YES NO
Conditions
EXPIRATION DATE COMPLETION ACCORDING TO PLAN ALL PERMITS COMPLETE
ZONING OFFICE ACCESS & NOTIFICATION UPON COMPLETION EROSION CONTROL
Objections YES NO
ST. CROIX COUNTY
,l
WISCONSIN
ZONING OFFICE
IN oil IN no ST. CROIX COUNTY GOVERNMENT CENTER
1101 Carmichael Road
Hudson, WI 540 1 6-771 0
(715) 386-4680
January 30, 1997 File Ref: 98-96
Mary J. Michels
1797 County Rd. G
New Richmond, WI 54017
Re: Board of Adjustment Decision
Dear Ms. Michels:
The St. Croix County Board of Adjustment has reviewed your
application for a variance permit for an addition to a commercial
building and has approved your application with conditions. The
enclosed document is the formal decision regarding your
application.
Should you have any questions or concerns, please do not hesitate
in contacting me.
Very truly yours,
Thomas C. Nelson
Zoning Administrator
dl
Enclosure
cc: Dennis Donahue, Clerk - Town of Erin Prairie
• 0
FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS, AND DECISION
OF THE ZONING BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT
ST. CROIX COUNTY, WISCONSIN
Case: 98-96
Complete Application Received: November 13, 1996
Hearing Notice Publication: Weeks of 12/01/96 and 12/08/96
Hearing Date: December 19, 1996
FINDINGS OF FACT
Having heard all the testimony, considered the entire record
herein, and conducted an on-site inspection, the Board finds the
following facts:
1. The applicant is Mary J. Michels, whose address is 1797 County
Road G, New Richmond, Wisconsin 54017.
2. The applicant on November 13, 1996 filed with the Zoning
office an application for a variance for an addition to a
commercial building.
3. Mary J. Michels, is the owner of the property which is the
subject of the application which is located in the NE, of the
NE1/4, Section 21, T30N-R17W, Town of Erin Prairie, St. Croix
County, Wisconsin.
4. The subject property is presently used for Erin Corners
Tavern.
5. The Town of Erin Prairie supports the application.
6. Zoning Administrator, Tom Nelson, stated that this is a
variance request for an addition to a commercial building.
7. Nelson introduced Exhibit 1, a site plan of the commercial
property (tavern) at the intersection of County Road T & G.
They would like to remove part of building and add on a 34' x
20' addition. This addition will be closer to Co. Rd G.
8. Nelson introduced Exhibit 2, correspondence from the Town of
Erin Prairie approving this application.
9. Mary Michels, being duly sworn, stated that she is the owner
of Erin Corners Bar. She explained that this is not an
addition but a replacement and needs a variance to remove and
replace.
10. Exhibit 3 was introduced as photos of the old structure (12).
This part of the building held storage and a cooler.
f
CONCLUSIONS OF LAW
The Board concludes that:
1. The Board of Adjustment has authority under sec. 17.70(5) (c) 4,
St. Croix County Zoning Ordinance, to approve or deny a
request for a special exception use.
2. Special exception use permits may be terminated pursuant to
sec. 17.70(7)(d)5, St. Croix County Zoning Ordinance, if the
conditions of the decision are not followed.
3. Section 17.18 allows a special exception for Addition to a
Commercial Building.
DECISION
On the basis of the above Findings of Fact, Conclusions of Law, and
the record herein, the Board approves the applicant's request for
a variance for an addition to a commercial building on the
following vote:
Chairman J. Bradley Yes
T. Filipiak Yes
J. Neumann No
N. Golz Yes
A. Jensen Yes
with the following conditions:
1. They need to meet all commercial building standards.
2. This decision expires on December 19, 1997. No construction
may begin or continue after this date, unless an extension is
granted in writing by the Board of Adjustment prior to the
expiration date.
3. The applicant must complete this project according to the
plans submitted and the conditions stated herein. Minor
changes in the project must be submitted to and approved in
writing by the Zoning Office before the project starts or
continues. Major changes must be brought back to the Board of
Adjustment for review and approval.
4. The applicant is responsible for obtaining any permit or
approval required for the project by municipal, town, county
or state laws, rules or regulations before starting the
project.
5. The applicant must provide confirmation to the County Zoning
Department that all other permits or approvals have been
received.
2
•
6. The applicant must allow free and unlimited access to the site
during construction and operation at any reasonable time to
any Zoning Department employee to check for compliance with
this decision.
7. This decision has been issued with the understanding that any
construction equipment used is the right size to do the job
and can be brought to and removed from the project site
without unreasonable harm to vegetative cover or fish and/or
wildlife habitat. The removal of vegetative cover and
exposure of bare ground shall be restricted to the minimum
amount necessary for construction. Areas where soil is
exposed must be protected from erosion by seeding and
mulching, sodding, diversion of surface runoff, installation
of straw bales or silt screens, construction of settling
basins, or similar methods as soon as possible after removal
of the original ground cover.
8. No portion of the bank or upland which is altered, disturbed,
and/or unstable may remain unprotected for more than ten (10)
hours.
9. If filter fabric silt fences are utilized as the upland
erosion control method used to prevent sediment from washing
into the river, there should be a double-row of fences
parallel to each other about ten (10) feet apart. Someone
shall be designated to monitor the effectiveness of these silt
fences and maintain them before the work.crew leaves the work
site at the end of each work day. Tom Nelson shall be
notified of that designee.
10. The applicant must keep a copy of this decision at the site
during construction.
11. Tom Nelson, Zoning Administrator, shall be notified prior to
beginning the project. Call him at (715) 386-4680 so that
compliance inspections can be made.
12. The Board of Adjustment may change or revoke this decision if
the project becomes detrimental to the public interest.
13. Accepting this decision and beginning the project means that
the applicant has read, understands, and agrees to follow all
conditions of this decision.
APPEAL RIGHTS
This decision may be appealed by any person aggrieved by filing an
action in certiorari in the circuit court of this County within 30
days after the date of filing shown below. The County assumes no
liability for and makes no warranty as to the legality of any
construction commenced prior to the expiration of this 30-day
3
VIII
I
period or the identity of any person who may claim to be aggrieved
by this decision.
I
ZONING BOARD Ok DJUSTMENT
Signed
chairperson
Attest
Zoning Administrator
Dated: 02/04/97
Filed: 02/04/97
i
4
BOARD OF ADJUSTMENTS MEETING AND HEARING
Minutes
December 19, 1996
(This meeting was recorded by a court reporter)
-The meeting was called to order by Chairman Bradley at 9:00 am. A role
call was made. Golz, Neumann, Jensen, Filipiak and Bradley were present.
Chairman Bradley believes this to be a properly posted meeting and all
members are present.
Staff included: Tom Nelson,Zoning Administrator and Debbie Lenzen,
Administrative Secretary.
Jensen moved to approve the agenda as published, second by Tim Filipiak.
No minutes of the last meeting were available for approval.
UNFINISHED BUSINESS
Jeff Lauck/ Marv Sayre
Request for retail sales in a commercial district allowing for general
sales. They have a U-Haul operation and outdoor storage business.
The following exhibits were presented:
Exhibit 1: Minutes from October from the Town of Somerset
Exhibit 2: Letter from George Sinclear.
Marv Sayre from Oakdale, Minnesota informed the committee that he has been
approved for a U-Haul business. Conditions-merchandise for sale to be
held for a limited time. Miles Wittig, Somerset Planning Committee, has
met with Sayre and Planning Committee. Town Board, and Mr. Sayre have all
agreed on the conditions. Appearance was a big concern.
OLD BUSINESS
Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources - Marty Engel
Wisconsin DNR Marty Engel appeared before the committee, concerning a
blanket permit for all tree cutting or grading. Matter was tabled at the
last meeting.
The fol-towirrq exhibits were presented:
Exhibit 1: Brushing proposal Kinnickinnic River Fishery Area.
No response for a blanket permit. Explained just what projects the DNR
would like to accomplish. Proposing a light duty brushing project in the
Kinnickinnic 'township area. Engel is asking that brushing be a
maintenance project. The intent is for habitat improvement. Use trout
unlimited to keep.the cost at a minimum. Chairman Bradley asked Engel if
the Conservation Committee could review this project before any brushing
could be done. Engels suggested that Conservation committee review the
1
• i
Kinnickinnic River Fishery Area Master Plan to become familiar with it.
BOA committee suggested that the DNR inform the appropriate Town Chairmans
as to what projects are going on and also the Land Conservation Committee.
Engels requested written notices for any decisions the BOA makes.
Jana Paulson/Brooksbank
The lawsuit was discussed. The judge's decision was to either downscale
the house or increase the lot size. The house encompasses the whole lot.
They have filed a petition for a condemnation issue if their request is
not granted.
The following exhibits were presented:
Exhibit 1: Letter from Doar, Drill and Skow, the attorney (Michael Brose)
Exhibit.2: Blueprint of their house.
The total blueprint area is 62' x 731. Setback from property line of 251.
Move structures away from bluffline. With this request they are right on
the bluffline.
Bettendorf Trucking
Bettendorf Trucking - no violation on this property, but on the adjacent
property. He must move his trailers that are on the property that was
zoned commercial. BettendorfIs attorney has advised they would go through
the zoning process. Nothing has been heard of from them. Zoning will
turn this over to Corp. Counsel. No further action at this time.
Nelson read the notice as published. Article 5, Radio Tower-Henry Lentz,
St. Joseph Township was removed from the agenda.
PUBLIC HEARING
The St. Croix County Board of Adjustment has scheduled a public hearing
for Thursday, December 19, 1996 at 9:00 am at the government Center, 1101
Carmicheal Rd., Hudson, Wisconsin to consider the following appeals to the
St. Croix County Zoning ordinance. an on-site investigation will be made
of each site in question, after which the board will return for the
purpose of deliberating and voting on the appeals.
1. ARTICLE: 17.18 Addition to Commercial Building
APPELLANT: Mary J. Michels
LOCATION: NE1i4, NE1i4, Sec. 21, T30N-R17W, Town of Erin
Prairie
2. ARTICLE: 17.14 Access Road on Ag. Property
APPELLANT: Roger & Ruth Swartz/Steven Wlodyga
LOCATION: Part of the SE1i4, Sec. 36, T30N-R17W, Town of
Erin Prairie
3. ARTICLE: 15.04(3)(a)3 Holding Tank New Construction
APPELLANT: Tsuefu Yang
LOCATION: NWiic, NW1i4, Sec.22, T29N-R15W, Town of
Springfield
2
4. ARTICLES: 17.55 Home Occupation
17.65 (3) Off Premise Sign
APPELLANT: Janet Hoffman
LOCATION: SW1/4, NW1/4, Sec. 10, T28N-R19W, Town of Troy
5. ARTICLE: 17.15(6)(1) Radio Tower * CANCELLED
APPELLANT: Henry Lentz/metropolitan Aerial Structures
LOCATION: Part of the NW1/4 of the SE1/4 and the NE1/4, SE1/4,
' Sec. 22, T30N-R20W, Town of St. Joseph
*6. ARTICLE: 17.299(2) Filling and Grading Shoreland District
APPELLANT: Jeffrey V. Christensen
LOCATION: SE1/4, SW1/4, Sec. 15, T28N-R218W, Town of
Kinnickinnic
All interested persons are invited to attend said hearing and be heard.
Additional information may be obtained from the office of the St. Croix
County Zoning Administrator, Hudson, Wisconsin at (715)386-4680.
John Bradley, Chairman
St. Croix Co. Board of Adjustment
Addition to Commercial Building/Mary J.Michels,Town of Erin Prairie
Nelson introduced Exhibit 1, a site plan of Commercial property tavern at
intersection at T & G. They would like to remove part of building and add
on a 34 x 20' addition. This addition will be closer to Co. Rd G;
Exhibit 2 was correspondence from Town of Erin Prairie application was
approved.
Mary Michels, being duly sworn, stated that she is the owner of Erin
Corners Bar. She explained that this is not an addition but a replacement
and needs a variance to remove and replace.
Exhibit 3 was introduced. It was photos of the old structure (12). This
part of the building held storage and cooler.
Access Road on Ag. Property/Roger & Ruth Schwartz/Steven Wlodyga
A special exception request on a road going through ag district. The
following exhibits were introduced: Exhibit 1, an Aerial photo
representing proposed easement; Exhibit 2, correspondence from the Town
of Erin Prairie. Tom read the letter to the Board which described the
parcel -and fts use.
Steve Wlodyga, being duly sworn, came forward and addressed the Board. He
explained that his request was for an access driveway and explained what
he has done for this thus far. Wlodyga explained that he would like the
driveway access along the edge of the property, not in the middle of the
property. Nelson explained that the re-zoning has gone through, but no
CSM has been done .yet. The CSM will include the 66 foot strip, so will be
fee title ownership. After some discussion and listening to Wlodyga, it
was decided that this request is for a variance, not a special exception.
3
The question was asked if there would be a safety issue related to site
distance with entry or exit of the driveway if it is put in requested
location. Wlodyga said that he does not believe that there would be a
problem. The Board will visit this property later today.
Holding Tank New Construction/Tsuefu Yang
Nelson explained that this is a request for a variance to the sanitary
ordinance. Right now there is a 4 bedroom house on the property.
Nelson introduced Exhibit 1, a copy of the soil test; Exhibit 2, a picture
of the 4 bedroom house and proposed site for new 2 bedroom house; Exhibit
3, a Plot Plan showing residence and barn and site for new holding tank
and butchering building; Exhibit 4, a Site plan/building plan showing
oriental cultural butchering building representing a 3,000 gallon holding
tank.
Tsuefu Yang, being duly sworn, addressed the Board explaining that he
would like to put in a holding tank for his butchering building as the
existing mound system is for the house and would not be large enough for
both buildings. Discussion was held on the report on suitable soil for
system. Yang went over the map with the Board, pointing out the existing
system and buildings. Gail Smith drew up the diagrams and did the soil
testing. Yang told the Board that the amount of animals that will go
through this building varies and that he does not have an accurate count
of how many would be butchered in a year. The Board informed Yang that
they are not in favor of holding tanks as they seem to create problems.
Yang told the Board that he has appeared before the Town of Springfield on
this issue and that they are waiting to see what the Board of Adjustments
does before deciding.
Nelson suggested that Yang may want to talk with the state and look into
putting in a whole new mound system to use for both residence and
butchering building. The Board will visit the site today.
Home Occupation/Off Premise Sign/Janet Hoffman
Nelson introduced Exhibit 1, a copy of plat map representing the Town of
Troy and highlighting the property; Exhibit 2, a copy of the map out of
the real property office representing several properties and location of
requested sign; Exhibit 3, correspondence from the Town of Troy stating
that Janet Hoffman has appeared before the appropriate Boards. All Boards
have approved the request to put up the sign.
Janet Rbffmaln, being.,duly sworn, addressed the Board and noted that the
correct address is Coulee Trail, not Coulee Road. She explained that she
plans to open a small frame business in her home. She is requesting a
sign in her yard, and a sign off premise. The Board explained to her that
the size of a minor sign is 2 square feet and a major sign is 6 square
feet. Hoffman explained that the off premise sign would be on the corner
of Coulee Trail,and the west side of 35.
Introduced to the board was Exhibit 4, a letter from the Town of Troy and
Exhibit 5, a copy of the public hearing notice noting the approval of the
3 4
neighbors (Brummel) for the sign.
The Board will visit the site later today.
Radio Tower/Lentz/Metropolitan Aerial Structures
Removed from the agenda.
"Filling and Grading Shoreland District/Jeffrey Christensen
Nelson explained Jeffrey Christensen's request for filling and grading
application within flood plain area.
Nelson introduced Exhibit 1, a site plan representing a new one acre pond
and new,1/4 acre pond, site of home - all south of County Trunk J and east
of Highway 65; Exhibit 2, a copy of warrantee deed transferring property;
Exhibit 31 correspondence from Town of Kinnickinnic dated November 6,
1996, stating that decision was tabled until next meeting; Exhibit 4,
correspondence from Town of Kinnickinnic dated November 12, 1996,
postponing recommendation on variance; Exhibit 5 correspondence from Town
of Kinnickinnic dated December 5, 1996. Town Board passed a motion that
denied request stating that proper procedure was not followed.
Jeffrey Christensen, being duly sworn, addressed the group explaining that
he is looking for a special exception for wildlife scrape that has already
been created.
The Board asked him to update Exhibit 1 and show them where the new home
is and the area of the former home. He noted that he will be selling off
19 acres. This was labeled on Exhibit 1.
Christensen explained to the Board the process he used to build the
wildlife scrape and said that he did in partnership with the DNR. One pond
is 1/4 acre and the other is 1/2 to 3/4 of an acre. Nelson noted that one
of the ponds is less than 300 feet from the river. Christensen said that
both ponds were completed in May and that he had obtained a permit last
April from the DNR. The permit was presented to the Board and was labeled
Exhibit 6. He failed to talk to the county before proceeding as he felt
that getting the permit would take too long and he wanted to move forward
with this project. Christensen said that he thought no one at the county
level would object to this since he already had the permit from the DNR.
Chairman Bradley read a section from the Zoning Book regarding the fact
that it. take's Board.-approval before a project like this is started and
that the DNR permit is not valid unless approval is gotten from the
appropriate authorities. He felt that by asking the Board to approve this
project it was putting them in a "tough spot" as he did not follow the
proper channels. Christensen said that he did talk to Tom Nelson about
this last,April, but after that conversation, felt that it would take to
long to go through the channels. Nelson said that they would have been
willing to work with him on this and explained how the process works.
Nelson is also concerned that the DNR and the excavating contractor did
not check to see it he had obtained this permit. Chairman Bradley then
5
proceeded to read a part of the ordinance that dealt with this.
Christensen then requested that the Board discuss the fact that Chairman
Bradley may have a conflict of interest in this matter as this was his old
farm. Chairman Bradley stated that he would consider this as he would
anyone else and read from the Board's bylaws (bylaw #3) concerning this.
'The Board all agreed, and told Mr. Christensen, that their main concern is
that this was done before he got the permit and was done even though he
knew that he had to have the proper permit.
The Board will review the property as a group later today.
Recess at 12:35 p.m. to visit the sites.
DECISIONS:
The Board reconvened and rendered the following decisions.
Jeff Lauck/ Marv Sayre
Motion by Filipiak, seconded by Jensen to approve with the following
conditions: They need to follow all town recommendations, maintain in a
neat and orderly fashion, employ no more than five (5) employees and
working hours are as follows:
9:00 am - 5:00 pm: October 1 through March 31 (Monday-Friday)
9:00 am - 8:00 pm: April 1 through September 30 (Monday-Friday)
9:00 am - 3:00 pm: Year round on Saturdays
Not to be open on Sundays and must follow town recommendations.
The following vote was taken: Filipiak, yes; Jensen, yes; Neumann, yes;
Golz, yes; Bradley, yes.
Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources - Marty Engel
i
Motion by Jensen, seconded by Bradley to deny blanket permit of light
brush cutting. The following vote was taken: Jensen, yes; Neumann, yes;
Filipiak, yes; Golz, yes; Bradley, yes.
Motion by Filipiak, seconded by Golz to approve light brush cutting
application with the comment that the Board will look at this project
again next summer. The following vote was taken: Golz, yes; Jensen, yes;
Filipiak, yet; Neumann, yes; Bradley, yes.
August/September Minutes
Motion by Neuman, seconded by Jensen to approve August and September Board
of Adjustment Committee Meeting Minutes. All in Favor. Motion Carried.
Mary Michels
Motion by Golz, seconded by Jensen to approve addition to commercial
building with the condition that they meet all commercial building
standards. The following vote was taken: Neumann, no; Golz, yes;
6
Filipiak, yes; Jensen, yes; Bradley, yes.
Roger and Ruth Schwartz/ Steven Wlodyga
Motion by Filipiak, seconded by Jensen to approve Access Road on Ag
Property with the condition that there is a 2% slope of 50 feet to
stabilize for erosion control and proper culvert size. The following vote
was taken: Filipiak, yes; Jensen, yes; Golz, yes; Neumann, yes; Bradley,
yes.
Tsuefu Yang
Motion by Bradley, seconded by Filipiak to deny holding tank new
construction. The Board felt he needs to look at other alternatives. The
following vote was taken: Neumann, yes; Filipiak, yes; Jensen, yes; Golz,
yes; Bradley, yes.
I
Janet Hoffman
Motion by Golz, seconded by Jensen to approve Home Occupation and Off
Premise Sign as long as all size requirements are met (on premise sign 2
x 3 foot, off premise sign 32 feet). This will be subject to a yearly
inspection by the zoning office. The following vote was taken: Filipiak,
yes; Jensen, yes; Golz, yes; Neumann, yes; Bradley, yes.
Jeffrey Christensen
Motion by Jensen, seconded by Neumann to deny Filling and Grading
Shoreland District. The Board asks that the land be restored by June 1,
1997. The following vote was taken: Neumann, yes; Golz, yes; Filipiak,
yes; Jensen, yes; Bradley, yes.
Respectfully submitted,
Art Jens n, secretary
dl
7
c 5i f 3 o-V 0
f 0 d r1
c ? 3
A. -k
U) $ 2 m z A m e~ •
0 0) 0 0) ? 3 C .0. C'f O W N I-4
- ~.4 o
CD -4
O C m 7 m O ID 3 m v 0 O
3 o y o W 00
y = a
S
0 m ~ 3
m D a
c
N W a
c o
3 a
O
m ? N +n l~
co cD (D 0 r- ca
m N N 00 In 0 C
n ~
O O O o
~-u a 3
0 3 CO In (A m
= Q v v
N
m c m o o•
W v c nil
m CL
Z u Z
Z O
D
O <e
p c v
m -
0
Oro
c ~
m
I ~
m N
H
Z ~ N
M
CL A Z
C Z
~ m
I
N!
A
O
N a -4 D
0 S Q
m fl
r N O
^y^ N C
O U) = -
O O Z M
3 N d N S
N C
N 0.
N C&
N m A
C ~ O II
fl wo
CD
O7
N N I ~
9 O
ON
O
O
b
I m w
ba O cam.,
I o ~ I ~ a
Parcel 012-1047-40-000 02/10/2010 10:17 AM
PAGE 1 OF 1
Alt. Parcel 21.30.17.317B 012 - TOWN OF ERIN PRAIRIE
Current ❑X ST. CROIX COUNTY, WISCONSIN
Creation Date Historical Date Map # Sales Area Application # Permit # Permit Type # of Units
00 0
Tax Address: Owner(s): O = Current Owner, C = Current Co-Owner
O - MICHELS, MARY J
MARY J MICHELS
1797 CTY RD G
NEW RICHMOND WI 54017
Districts: SC = School SP = Special Property Address(es): * = Primary
Type Dist # Description * 1797 CTY RD G
SC 3962 NEW RICHMOND
SP 1700 WITC
Legal Description: Acres: 1.000 Plat: N/A-NOT AVAILABLE
SEC 21 T30N R17W 1 AC IN NE NE COM 33 FT Block/Condo Bldg:
W& 82.5 FT S OF NE COR, TH S 67 FT, W
142.5 FT, N 116.5 FT, TH E 93 FT, S 45 Tract(s): (Sec-Twn-Rng 40 1/4 160 1/4)
DEG E 70 FT TO POB 21-30N-17W
Notes: Parcel History:
Date Doc # Vol/Page Type
07/23/1997 1013/227 J F
07/23/1997 877/19
07/23/1997 867/456
07/23/1997 785/159
2009 SUMMARY Bill Fair Market Value: Assessed with:
444 136,600
Valuations: Last Changed: 11/07/2005
Description Class Acres Land Improve Total State Reason
COMMERCIAL G2 1.000 15,000 115,500 130,500 NO
Totals for 2009:
General Property 1.000 15,000 115,500 130,500
Woodland 0.000 0 0
Totals for 2008:
General Property 1.000 15,000 115,500 130,500
Woodland 0.000 0 0
Lottery Credit: Claim Count: 1 Certification Date: Batch 545
Specials:
User Special Code Category Amount
Special Assessments Special Charges Delinquent Charges
Total 0.00 0.00 0.00
Parcel 012-1047-50-000 P oziloi2o E 1 OF A 1
PAGE 1 1
Alt. Parcel 21.30.17.317C 012 -TOWN OF ERIN PRAIRIE
Current ❑ ST. CROIX COUNTY, WISCONSIN
Creation Date Historical Date Map # Sales Area Application # Permit # Permit Type # of Units
00 0
Tax Address: Owner(s): 0 = Current Owner, C = Current Co-Owner
0 - MICHELS, MARY J
MARY J MICHELS
1797 CTY RD G
NEW RICHMOND WI 54017
Districts: SC = School SP = Special Property Address(es): Primary
Type Dist # Description
SC 3962 NEW RICHMOND
SP 1700 WITC
Legal Description: Acres: 3.080 Plat: N/A-NOT AVAILABLE
SEC 21 T30N R17W NE NE COM 175.5 FT W NE Block/Condo Bldg:
COR SEC 21, TH S 185 FT, W 18 FT, TH S
260 FT, TH W 372 FT, TH N 445 FT, E 390 Tract(s): (Sec-Twn-Rng 40 1/4 160 1/4)
FT TO POB EXC W 50' THEREOF .511 AC AS 21-30N-17W
DESC 695/492
i
Notes: Parcel History:
Date Doc # Vol/Page Type
07/23/1997 1013/227 JF
07/23/1997 877/19
07/23/1997 867/456
07/23/1997 785/159
2009 SUMMARY Bill Fair Market Value: Assessed with:
445 47,400
Valuations: Last Changed: 11/07/2005
Description Class Acres Land Improve Total State Reason
COMMERCIAL G2 3.080 45,300 0 45,300 NO
Totals for 2009:
General Property 3.080 45,300 0 45,300
Woodland 0.000 0 0
Totals for 2008:
General Property 3.080 45,300 0 45,300
Woodland 0.000 0 0
Lottery Credit: Claim Count: 0 Certification Date: Batch
Specials:
User Special Code Category Amount
Special Assessments Special Charges Delinquent Charges
Total 0.00 0.00 0.00
Parcel 012-1047-50-110 02/10/2010 10:17 AM
PAGE 1 OF 1
Alt. Parcel M 21.30.17.317C10 012 - TOWN OF ERIN PRAIRIE
Current ❑X ST. CROIX COUNTY, WISCONSIN
Creation Date Historical Date Map # Sales Area Application # Permit # Permit Type # of Units
00 0
Tax Address: Owner(s): O = Current Owner, C = Current Co-Owner
O - MICHELS, MARY J
MARY J MICHELS
1797 CTY RD G
NEW RICHMOND WI 54017
Districts: SC = School SP = Special Property Address(es): * = Primary
Type Dist # Description
SC 3962 NEW RICHMOND
SP 1700 WITC
Legal Description: Acres: 0.511 Plat: N/A-NOT AVAILABLE
SEC 21 T30N R17W .511AC PT NE NE COM Block/Condo Bldg:
1755W OF NE COR SEC 21, TH S 185'; TH
W 18'; TH S 260'; TH W 322'; TO POINT OF Tract(s): (Sec-Twn-Rng 40 1/4 160 1/4)
BEGINNING; TH N 445'; W 50', TH S 445'; 21-30N-17W
TH E TO POINT OF BEGINNING
Notes: Parcel History:
Date Doc # Vol/Page Type
07/23/1997 1064/478 QC
07/23/1997 695/492
2009 SUMMARY Bill Fair Market Value: Assessed with:
446 8,100
Valuations: Last Changed: 11/07/2005
Description Class Acres Land Improve Total State Reason
COMMERCIAL G2 0.511 7,700 0 7,700 NO
Totals for 2009:
General Property 0.511 7,700 0 7,700
Woodland 0.000 0 0
Totals for 2008:
General Property 0.511 7,700 0 7,700
Woodland 0.000 0 0
Lottery Credit: Claim Count: 0 Certification Date: Batch M
Specials:
User Special Code Category Amount
Special Assessments Special Charges Delinquent Charges
Total 0.00 0.00 0.00