The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About040-1147-95-000(4) BOARD F ADJUSTMENT DECISION Request of. Steven E. Weekes for a special ) exception use, Article 3.12 E (c), Bluff- ) :Line Setback, St. Croix Riverway, ST. CROIX ) A-35-84 COUNTY ZONING ORDINANCE. Location: Govt. ) June 26, 1984 Lot# 3, Lot 14, T28N-R20W, Town of Troy. ) The St. Croix County Board of Adjustment conducted a public hearing on June 26, 1984 to consider the request of St ven E. Weekes for a special eception use, Article 3.12 E(c), Bluf.fline Setback, St. roi.x Riverway, ST. CROIX COUNTY ZONING ORDINANCE. The St. Croix County Board of Adjustment conducted an onsite inspection, of the site in question. v After inspection, the St. Croix County Board of Adjustment entered an Executive Session to discuss the request. After returning to open sessi n, the following decision was rendered. Motion by Supervisor Stephens to deny the request because the 100 foot setback does not hinder construction and does comply with NR 118 and 3.12 of the St. Croix County Riverway District. Seconded by Supervisor Meinke. Motion carried. Vote to deny: Meinke, yes; Stephens, yes; Kelly, yes. All variances approved must b acted on or constructed within one (1) year from date of approval or they shall be null and void. 7-- 07 Vernon Kelly, Secretary St. Croix County Board of Adjustment VK:HB:mj Steven Weekes Town Clerk Jake Vander Voort, DNR Steve Johnson, MN-WI BAC Dick Thompson, County Planner I i BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT MEETING AND HEARING June 26, 1984 9:00 - 4:30 p.m. Meeting called to order by Chairman Stephens at 9:40 a.m. in the County Board Room, Courthouse, Hudson, Wisconsin. All members present. Minutes of the May meeting and hearings approved as mailed. Old business: Jon Erickson talked to the Board about his denial for filling a pond adjacent to Cedar Lake. Board will inspect the property and make a,decision. Hearing called to order by Chairman Stephens. Zoning Administrator read notice of hearings as published in the county and 'local newspapers. 1. ARTICLE: 2.6(12),Radio Transmission Tower, Amended Height APPELLANT: Park Broadcasting Company LOCATION: NW's of NEB of Section 8, T30N-R19W, To of Somerset 2. ARTICLE: 2.3 F(3)(d), Structure APPELLANT: Kenneth O'S''hea LOCATION: NV% of NEk of Section 25, T30N-R20W, To of St. Joseph 3. ARTICLE: 8.5 C, Sign APPELLANT: Halle Builders, Inc. LOCATION: SWk of NE14 of Section 4, T30N-R18W, To of Richmond 4. ARTICLE: 8.4 B(2)(b), Setback from a State Highway APPELLANT: Randolph Boll LOCATION: NW4 of NWk of Section 24, T29N-R18W, To of Warren 5. ARTICLE: 8.4 BUM), Setback from a State Highway APPELLANT: Gary Martin LOCATION: NW'k of SE's of Section 22, T30N-R20W, Town of St. Joseph 6. ARTICLE: 3.12 GG, St. Croix Riverway, Lift APPELLANT: Richard A. Th mpsoh LOCATION: NE114 of SEA of Section 35, T30N-R20W, To of St. Joseph 7. ARTICLE: 8.4 B(4)(b), Setback from a Town Road APPELLANT: Curtis Arvold LOCATION: NE's of NE4 of Section 25, T30N-R20W, To of St. Joseph 8. ARTICLE: 3.12 E(c), St. Croix Riverway, Bluffline Setback APPELLANT: Steven Weekes LOCATION: Govt. Lot#3, of 14, T28N-R20W, To of Troy 9. ARTICLE: 3.12 GG, St. Croix Riverway, Lift APPELLANT: Gary Griswold LOCATION: Lots 34 & 35, Section 13, T28N-R20W, To of Troy 1. Mrs Sandra Griswold presented heir request to construct a lift on their property. There will not be any trees remove and will also curtail erosion. 2. Hank Van Dyk presented the request of Park Broadcasting, explaining that F.A.A. and F.C.C. regulations require that the tower be raised to 1349 feet to insure getting into St. Louis Park. Robert Burns also explained the reason for requesting the additional height. Peter Stark spoke about the tower, explaining that the additional height would not change the margin of safety. Mr. John DuBois said that the additional height would not cause any radio o television interference. - 2 - Greg Moore objected to the tower. He feels that if additional height is required, the tower should be moved. Robert Gabrick objected for several reason. Judy Peterson objected. 3. Kenneth O'Shea presented his request to construct a pole barn on his property that would be approximately 120 feet from CTH "V" and 25 foot side yard. 4. Wes Halle presented his request to construct an onsite sign that would be 12' by 12' advertising his business. The structure would not obstruct the view on STH "64", and a town road. 5. Randolph Bollum presented his request to construct a garage that would be 90 feet from the centerline of US 12. He explained that it is about the only place to construct it due to the location of the well and sanitary system. 6. Richard Thompson presented his request to construct a lift on his property and to leave a deck and landing that he has constructed. Correspondence was read from ad- joining landowners objecting to the structure. Correspondence was read from MN-WI Boundary Area.Commission urging the Board to follow D N R request. Jake Vander Voort, D N R, informed the Board that the deck and landing should be removed and they will object to the deck if approved by the Board of Adjustment. He recommends that a specific time be given to remove the deck and then they will approve of the lift. 7. Roger Arvold presented the request of Curtis Arvold to construct a house that would be 140 feet from the center of the cul de sac in Woodland Hills, He stated the reason for the setback is due to the location of the sewer system. 8. Gary Martin presented his request to construct a storage building that would be setback 75 feet from the centerline of STH "35" & "64". He explained the reason for the requested setback. The structure would be in its place until a permanent structure was added to the existing building. Questions by members of the Board. 9. Steven Weekes presented his request to construct a house that would be 40 feet from the bluffline. Mike Maquire, an architect, spoke in favor of the request, ex- plaining the characteristics of the lot. Correspondence was read from the MN-WI Boundary Area Commission. Jake Vander Voort explained that the Board of Adjustment only has the power to act on existing lots at the time the ordinance was approved. It is also the Board of Adjustment's decision to determine the hardship. Hearings recessed to inspect the properties in question. Board returned to session to render decisions. 1. Jon Erickson: Motion by Supervisor Stephens to permit filling with 10 foot wide channel from the lake to the point of entrance of natural waterway maintained at the present depth. Sidewalls of channel shall be secured to prevent erosion, with com- pleted work to be inspected by Zoning Administrator. Culvert from driveway must be removed or blocked to prevent flowage into channel. D N R approval in writing shall be furnished to the Zoning Office before filling can begin. Seconded by Supervisor Meinke. Motion carried. Vote to approve: Stephens, yes; Meinke, yes; Kelly, yes. 2. Park Broadcasting: Motion by Supervisor Stephens to deny the request because the original appeal stated the tower was researched to function at 1000 feet. Seconded by Supervisor Kelly. Motion carried. Vote to deny; Kelly, yes; Meinke, yes; Stephens, yes. 3. Kenneth O'Shea: Motion by Supervisor Kelly to approve the request as it is the best location and use of the land. Seconded by Supervisor Stephens. Motion carried. Vote to approve: Meinke, yes; Stephens, yes; Kelly, yes. 4. Halle Builders, Inc.: Motion by Supervisor Meinke to approve the sign request. Sign shall not be larger than 12 feet by 12 feet. The sign will not cause a traffic hazard on STH 64 or*the town road. This is an onsite sign and shall be removed if and when the house is sold. Seconded by Supervisor Stephens. Motion carried. Vote to approve: Kelly, yes; Meinke, yes; Stephens, yes. 5. Randolph Bollum: Motion by Supervisor Stephens to deny the request because there are alternate sites on the property to construct a garage. Seconded by Supervisor Meinke. Motion carried. Vote to deny: Stephens, yes; Meinke, yes; Kelly, yes. - 3 - 6. Gary Martin: Motion by Supervisor Meinke to approve a temporary storage building. Building shall be removed after five years, or structure to the north of main building is constructed. Seconded by Supervisor Stephens. Motion carried. Vote to approve: Meinke, yes; Stephens, yes; Kelly, yes. 7. Richard A. Thompson: Motion by Supervisor Stephens to deny the request of Richard Thompson. The present structure, both upper and lower decks, shall be removed by August 1, 1984. The bluffline to be restored to its original contour. Zoning Admin- istrator to inspect the site after completion. Mr. Thompson can re-apply for a lift upon completion of the structures removal and approval of the Zoning Administrator. Seconded by Supervisor Kelly. Motion carried. Vote to deny: Stephens, yes; Meinke, yes; Kelly, yes. 8. Curtis Arvold: Motion by Supervisor Kelly to approve the 140 foot setback from the center of the cul de sac as it is the best use of the land. Seconded by Super- visor Stephens. Motion carried. Vote to approve: Stephens, yes; Kelly, yes; Meinke, yes. 9. Steven Weekes: Motion by Supervisor Stephens to deny the request because the 100 foot setback does not hinder construction and does comply with NR 118 and 3.12 of the St. Croix County Riverway District. Seconded by Supervisor Meinke. Motion carried. Vote to deny: Meinke, yes; Stephens, yes; Kelly, yes. 10. Gary Griswold: Motion by Supervisor Meinke to approve the request as it does not disturb the surrounding area and complies with NR 118 and 3.12 GC-of the St. Croix County Riverway Ordinance. Seconded by Supervisor Kelly. Motion carried. Vote to approve: Kelly, yes; Stephens, yes; Meinke, yes. The next scheduled meeting will be July 24, 1984 at 9:00 a.m. with hearings scheduled for 10:00 a.m. Motion by Supervisor Meinke to adjourn. Seconded by Supervisor Kelly. Motion carried. Meeting and hearings adjourned at 4:20 p.m. Vernon Kelly, Secre ry St. Croix County Board of Adjustment This is a full day meeting. VK:HB:mj Form - STC - 104 4 AS BUILT SANITARY SYSTEM REPO 81 OWNER TOWNSHIP l T N-R,~29_0 W d+ OyV ADDRESS /2-~; _ /)/u. ✓L ST. CROIX COUNTY, COVC 6`S d' SUBDIVISION ,&4_ LOT oL47- Ly-r zy- LOT SIZE PLAN VIEW Distances and dimensions to meet requirements of I•-LIM 83 SHOW EVERYTHING WITHIN 100 FEET OF SYSTEM 1 00, (/Vb7~: NAOPOS~D (/Voa-rn P4..*) nrY LX E vi/EGi /0' Ta l dv~/l /Ova Fn or» .1'Y S? Sm J ~ATM 01' R_FS XOEfVCE) RES2DrNO ~ Gi4RAG~ 90 70 AA&P04&D IAIELL TV Pnup osJFO w~u T ~o 3Y' k 3~. VrNrSTACK (wrs r P„pr-ors r LzN 1 ' vv,~n /oo~ J~itom SYSrEm / ~ / ~ TofU-AST /°WRAinTY LL-Ar 18' 4 !7 9d,,four), Pa.OPEAr Lswe .rw PnopvRsY coRNL'R INDICATE NORTH ARROW BENCHMARK: Describe the vertical reference point used .i/tut(jQZnE 0^1.. row-T H La-r Elevation of vertical reference point: 22 Proposed slope at site: _,Zwo_ SEPTIC TANK: Manufacturer: S€/Z Liquid Capacity: "q_6 U L Number of rings used: ,3 Tank manhole cover elevation: Tank Inlet Elevation: S Tank Outlet Elevation: 91•~l Number of feet from nearest Road: Front, Side 0 Rear, O 6 U t feet From nearest property line Front 10 Side,O Rear, ® s feet Number of feet from: well 7, building: (Include this information of the above plot plan)( 2 reference dimensions to septic tank) SEE REVERSE SIDE PUMP CHAMBER Manufacturer: Liquid Capacity: Pump Model: Pump/Siphon Manufacturer: Pump Size Elevation of inlet: Bottom of tank elevation: Pump off switch elevation: Gallons per cycle: Alarm Manufacturer: Alarm Switch Type: Number of feet from nearest property line: Front, O Side, O Rear Ft. Number of feet from well: Number of feet from building: (Include distances on plot plan). SOIL ABSORPTION SYSTEM Bed: Trench: ai Width: 9 Length: / Number of Lines: 2 Area Built: d~P-? Fill depth to top of pipe: y~ Number of feet from nearest property line: Front/- O Side, ® Rear,O F't. Number of feet from well. . a U Number of feet from building: Y (Include distances on plot plan). ,D2ST/22QuT2~,~ /aspE /~iJvB /+~~~'=rcrt ~onFAlt Iwnor+. A/9.gn9fL To GYD 0X LSn.FS SEEPAGE PIT BED 9Z..m .ELEV. 9~. 0 ~ Size: Number of pits: Diameter: Liquid depth: Bottom of seepage pit elevation: Area Built: Has either a drop box O or distribution box O been used on any of the above soil absorbtion sytems? (Check one). HOLDING TANK Manufacturer: Capacity: Number of rings used: Elevation of bottom of tank: • t9 Elevation of inlet: Number of feet from nearest property line: Front, O Side, O Rear, 0Ft. Number of feet from well: Number of feet from building: Number of feet from nearest road: Alarm Manufacturer: Inspector: Dated: o°L o Plumber on job: License Number: .22 Rs 3/84:mj M m - -,cc, O PLB (o7 ,~rp~ff L,a~ y _ - PLOT anc3 CR055 y SMT1ON PLANS y 'R°c TIC" a, r I O I I V o 0 i V\ • o ° s~•P~.c GU,Pe~f 7 l' o v -rpcv,V Y~ . S NFD 7i5►T~ 33 oa Fresh Air Inlets And Observation Pipe Approved Vent Cap Minimum 12" Above pOO o Final Grade /00, S M 0M 4" Cast Iron Above Pipe Vent Pipe i o Final Grade Marsh Nay Or Synthetic Covering min. 2" Aggregate Over Pipe Distribution Tee Pipe -00 0 0 0 " Aggregate 0 Perforated Pipe Below Beneath Pipe 0 Coupling Terminating At e) Al Bottom Of System cC~(l~{ll/~'~ ~ O F/ 50ZI eAd c~ awnJOA Yr1 rh b ~ V O/ 00'% LAJ W (A 41 et" 16 ILI Ru(WwO.*) PHwoa oNV yC~ , ^N VMNNrid SAW 3AS?QgjVf(* ,moo • .'M L,LZ I AiNnw ism Is of J# i H1noS 2861 F d 7 S 00 111 _ d , ptC per, W u o r' W C =r CO cc~ 888 / / a M. r. C; M OU , W e ,;L , c o MDeglaS 34n 13 O Z LL z ai ir, - 3 iv p O 3~~ZZi8S09N Z C4 4)0 u; ? w n JZO ' LS L M • - O 1 Q1 Co a► +1 O t u. s. o (L r _ IL « $ l Z ~G f w w n . N ' Z O 4t1 IA 0 m - z 12 a st cn k 1 2I CD .Yi 1 O + N ~ 1 ti AIM jr ' 1 ZI 'Aj-co Spa 7g <1 apNa N j"B" J1 lumi G0.0 SiWlff c ` 9 Q'. asst x d 3 s t oN,~ W b "/M` "LS . Lai it 8 ~ ~N~ / yZ ~ g WON N a i-1 u N~ Z8 1d w 1 u yid Z u / spy 3 Ri o Z w / ~i'~• XIOUD % LS 3)1 V1; 'NOIIICIO'V 1S2i v in ro S1H013H WWOS -AO IV d 3H1 LA„ Ol030N3213d3Id \ i~ w ,zt MOON 'NiZ1.'CL N01133S 10'1 .I.N3WN213A00 NI Q31ti100'1 dKW A3Auns Q3iauti30 ZLI R_. 91999 *ON 4=K