Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
014-1080-04-000
Wisconsin Department ~f Commerce PRIVATE SEWAGE SYSTEM Safety and Building Division INSPECTION REPORT GENERAL INFORMATION (ATTACH TO PERMIT) Personal information you provide may be used for secondary purposes [Privacy Law, s.15.04 (1)(m)]. Permit Holder's Name: City Village X Township Kattre, Ra Forest, Town of CST BM Elev: / Insp. BM Elev; BM Description: .l0 p' cs'r q-cT.B~ IANK INtUKMAI IVN TYPE MANUFACTURER CAPACITY Septic L~ l ~- ~a Dosing ~ ~.~tti ~ ~ Aeration Holding TANK SETBACK INFORMATION TANK TO P/L WELL BLDG. Vent to Air Intake ROAD Septic ~ ~ r t/_ \ C J ,,, ~ S ~~ Dosing ut t t It ~~ f Aeration Holding PIIMPISIPHON INF~RMATit]N Manufacturer ..}_ ~ ~` .~•- w WEBS Demand GPM ~ ~ Model Number ZZj'O H Lift O ~~ 2 Fricti Loss ~ 3.f System Head 6 .S~ TDH Ft 3s. Ig Forcemain Length ( ti Dia. ~ u Dist. to well ti~~ i~ e.~u noe•P1~~T1/'1 Al CVCTCM GLC VHIIV IY VMI/1 county: St. Croix Sanitary Permit No: 499116 0 St Plan ID No: 2 9 S ~f `f ~- =T2 -~JS. l ~ reel Tax No 6 /L/- /DSO - a 4 - 000 Section/Town/Range/Map No: 09.31.15. ~Q STATION BS HI FS ELEV. Benchmark 3.90 f 0 ,a , o Alt. BM Bldg. Sewer ~^ Q - ~ p 1 0 ~ ~ S St/Htlnlet I2•~C ~ ~Sr SUHt Outlet / Dt Inlet Dt Bottom /~.S ~.Z 3O1 Header/Man. Z. 3 Z ~~3.6 3 Dist. Pipe • 3 a . ~ - 3 `tl ~ 7 / ~J Bot. System .L .tZ Fin Grade ~ u,: trl 1,e 1, ~~ + c,~ -- °° st c~~er , ~ S ~', ~ z , ', ~ wr ~ ~', z z ~ 8'-b.3 Ce,~~ 2.90 - 9~ 2 9 6-a . of ~~. III / , G D Q p,/o r ~ T i v`. RENC Width 1 Length ~ No. Of Trenches PIT DIMENSIONS No Of Pits Inside Dia. Liquid Depth DIMENSIONS ~2 ~^a Z ~~ SETBACK SYSTEM TO P/L BLDG WELL LAKE/STREAM LEACHING CHAMBE u acturer INFORMATION Typ/ey~Of Syste S / ~ ' 3UD/ ~ ~ T del Number: Ill ~ 1"~1[~Tn1~11T1l11~1 CVCTCIIA / 1 11..e .Fn f// \ Header/Manifold . ~ Distribution / ~ 1~ Pipe(s) - x Hole Sizer / ~ / /~ x Hole Spacing r Vent to Air Intake . ~ ----- acin l t S th •~ i Z 2 ~v Dia Length g p s Leng e.~u /+AVC~ 7.____"_.__ n_._._.v_ ~_~.. .... ne.......1 n. A*_!_r~rln Svefama C)nly Depth Over Depth Over xx Depth of xx Seeded/Sodded xx Mulched Bed/Trench Center Bed/Trench Edges Topsoil Yes ' No Yes No i / s.r .. ~ r~ O~)MMF~VTS: [Incl~~e~Gode di re encyes, persons prgsent~tc. Inspection #1;_ U~fil~~l.(~a}o inspection #2:_~/D r •"/~"~ Location: 2859 230th Avenue Unknown (NW 1!4 f~E 1/4 9 T31N R15W) Forest Estates Lot G 1.) Alt BM Description = S T- C-~~~ -f- DT. InnG~.~~-~- ~8"$"' f 2.) Bldg sewer length = 3 ~ n - amount of cover =(.r ~Z~ ~ ~,~C Plan revision Required? i !, Yes No _ Use other side for additional information. ', ___ _i_-_ _ ' - --- - - -- --- _ __ __ oo,, ,,,~~,, nn Dat In ,~e~pct~opr'-s Si~gna~ture SBD-6 0 (R.319) ~t7'~'"~'- 'Q~~ ~~-V~Q~''~ ~~~`"' ' ' - ~ Zu Parcel No: 09.31.15. s~ ~/ ~) ~s : 2 ,~, _ ___ ,; ____L L_- _ _ __ Cert. No. ~ u dor `~ Q "Ua.QI..~) Safety and Buildings Division County -"- 201 ~;, Washington Ave., P.C). Box 7162 i n ~ ~° ~ t Madison, WI 53747 - 7162 s~oi sin Department of Commerce ~ (608)266-3151 - ~ Sanitary Permit Number (to be fi d m o.) d~ 12~~f~ =-1"R-W+uZ. i0 ~ = ~~A ~ Sanitary Permit Application I ~ z = Te -tt~- li7 ~ _ 2N%. PST State Plan I.D. In accord with Comm 83.21, Wis. Adm. Code, personal information you pro ' b 'Lj~9q ~~~ c- 5 fitJ, i'C-QtM 1 may e used for secondary purposes Privacy Law, s15.04(i)(m) - P ~ I. Application Information -Please Print All Information t ss i . my~ ress ~ 255 Z ~- ~vE ~ ~~ Property Owner's Na me " ~ ~~~~ ~ ~~ 1 _ ~~~~ Lot N Block ~ W ~-~/~ ___~ Property wner's ailing Address ~ 1 ~ __ ~ ~' CD Sr O/ ~ CR X Property Location `~-` ` City, State CCU Zip C o de Phone N ,,////'')) ,, //rr ~ `&,!~'ti,Sectlon ~® /~' ~ t / ~~~ /~! o"f/C~- ~'^' ~ ~ /® S II. Type of Building {check all that a 1 -`- PP Y) circle o 1 ) T ~l N; R~$ E o~ C' ] or 2 F il am y Dwelling -Number of Bedrooms _~ Subdivision ame ^ Public/Commercial -Describe Use ~ f~ ~~~- ~~ ~~~, ^ State Owned -Describe Use ~ ~ ~ ~ Y ^City ^Village ~ownshi of p ~e~e s'~ iII T e of P i . yp erm t: (Check only one box on Tine A. Complete line B if applicable) A. _ New System ^ Replacement System ^ TreatmenUHolding Tank Replacement Oniy _ ^ Other Modification to Existing System B • ^ Permit Renewal ^ Permit Revision ^ Change of ^ Permit Transfer to New List Previous Permit Number and Datz Issued Before Expiration ~ Plumber Owner IV. T ype of POWTS System: (Check all that apply X / z,sp ~~ ~'~ ~ ",,,, ~`~7'~ ~ ^ Non -Pressurized In-Ground ^ Mo d > 24 i un n, of suitable soil ou td 24 in. ~ _ - ~'~1~+0 r4f suitable soil ^ At-Grade ^ Single Fass Sand Filter 'J C onstructed Wetland ^ Pressurized In-Ground L Holding Tank V Peat r erobic Treannent Unit ^ Recirculating Sand Filter ^ Recirculatin S th ti ^ g yn e c Media Filter Leaching Chamber ^ Drip Line ^ Grave!-less Pipe V, Dis ersaUTreatment Area Information: ^ Other (ex lei ' Design Flow (gpd) yso Design Soil Application Rate(gpdsf) Dispersal Area Required (sf) __ ~ p -Dispersal Area Proposed (sty System Elevation ' sc~ Ys o ~.2 sd VI. Tank Info Capacity in Gallons Tota! Gallons Number of Lttuts Manufacturer W / P9~d~ 1 P C: S Prefab Concrete Sits C d Steel 'Fiber i Plastic ~ New Existin g j ~n ~ l " ~U "' ` - ' ' ~~ onstructe Glass I _ Septic or I~Ioldsng Taiilc Tanks Tanks ~ ~ f ~ .{, / C ., ~~~ ~~s lG 3 `t ~ -- Aerobic Treatment Unit ~ r.> - - iJosing Chamber "-"' ~ ~~~ _ VIL ResponsihiGty Statement- I, the undersigned, assume responsibility for ' t orlon of the POii'TS shown on the attached plans. Plumber's Na me (Print) Plumber's Si gnature P/ PRS Number Business Phone Number j i .'~Z ~ ~ ~~lu ~~ a~ 7 ~~ ~ 71..x' .3 -.~ ~l ~ Plumber's Addre ss (Street, City, State, Zip Code) VIII. Count /De artment IJse OnI i .Approved ©D' approv _ Sanitary Permit Fee (' •ludes Groundwater Date Issued Issuing gent Signatur 'Yo Stamps) ~~ r Surcharge Fee) r iven Reason for Denial ~ S5~ --° ~ . ~~ ~ IX. Conditions f A r I/ SYSTEM OWNER: 3) ~ ' C~) ~~~.vl,~ ~.~~ _~ 1 Septic tank, effluent fllterand / ` // + dispersal cell must all be serviced /maintained y~,~ Q,p,.Q,~/l.>~"-~ S t.t~ ~-' ~2C~ ~,. II r as per management plan provided by plumber- ~ 1 ~ /I ~ - W ~.~.~~ ~ S `-~`~ 2. All setback requirements must be maintained J 9~,~ as per applicable code/ordinances. G,,,~,,,~,~µ9..~.c~ ~ ~a~ l ), ' 39~. Gs~ Easy /off/.'ne ioio' '~ .O ~ 0~ (!~' /0..d ? 4 ~ ~ ~ ~ 1~ D p A ss u m c.d e lei = ~on• oo ~ ~103/~ 3 z slope ~ ~~ ~ -~. ~~ , d ,%~ ~ ~ c ~ 0 `. ., P , ,` ~ e~ ~ ~ , \ ~` / / ~ 82 ,' ~~ .~fiy-CGMGtih iY1Sts~-/irZ. ~/d/7 ~ 7.1 disb~'ba,~c.e ck. oea a..~d~ ', , ~~a51oP( la~ar t`r~ e o f ~ art u-n N ~ ,' r /' i ~ Ylo~e : S : ~.r ~ b ~ d~P 85 ,~ l 5~.•1a,o,,/.C. ~ ~, v`P arGQ o f'f~ irra~,d ~ ' l ~ ~ / v Se a.s {~ aCad~~-f,a l/ S~{a~e ', ', sraa~ -F~•Q S.~~e• ' ~ ~~. 3> slope •, ~ ~, - , .p9.o' \ \ ~ ~~ ` `. Pr-© fused t,Jc csu' C~-+e~~e w~P t,~/Bcn P~*~bz,~~%h ~'~ Sep b'~ ~„~ o ~~-~ - ~ ~us~.sl0 ,o d. c. ., ~^O~°os 97,26, r d 6•edrq.,- '~ Propoaccl wall locc~io.~ ~ d.,r~pei~"y p~o~° pal G ~1 ~ jCa/ei l ~=~ So, l e Ja /c~a~ on ~~ f e ledQ ~o~ E,YiS~i~ ~nc'e/he l~. ~ ~ ~,~ade a•£ bass o-FS~~ ~~ h J r ~o '4~ 0 M ~~.8 0~~0 commerce.wi.gov isconsin Department of Commerce ~.~ i.:. ~,`a Safety and Buildings 4003 N KINNEY COULEE RD LA CROSSE WI 54601-1831 TDD #: (608) 264-8777 www. co m m e rce. wi. g o v/s b/ www.wisconsin.gov Jim Doyle, Governor Mary P. Burke, Secretary July 25; 2006 CUST ID No. 227990 WILLIAM C SCHUMAKER SCHUMAKER PLUMBING 1070 SCOTT RD HUDSON WI 54016 CONDITIONAL APPROVAL PLAN APPROVAL EXPIRES: 07/25/2008 SITE: Ray Kattre 230 Ave Town of Forest St Croix Coun><y NW1/4,~NE1/4, S9, T31N, R15W Lot: 4, Subdivision: Forest Estates ATTN.• POWTS Inspector ZONING OFFICE ST CROIX COUNTY SPIA 1101 CARMICHAEL RD HUDSON WI 54016 Identification Numbers: Transaction ID No. 1295447 Site ID No. 715946 Please refer to both identificationnumbers, above, in all comes ondence with the a enc . FOR: Description: Three Bedroom Mound System Object Type: POWTS Component Manual Regulated Object ID No.: 1088149 Maintenance required; 450 GPD Flow rate; b in Soil minimum depth to limiting factor from original grade; System: Mound Component Manual -Version 2.0, SBD-10691-P (N.O1/O1), Pressure Distribution Component Manual -Version 2.0, SBD-10706-P (N.O1/O1); Biofilter The submittal described above has been reviewed for conformance with applicable Wisconsin Administrative Codes and Wisconsin Statutes. The submittal has been CONDITIONALLY APPROVED. The owner, as defined in chapter 10.1.01(10), Wisconsin Statutes, is responsible for compliance with all code requirements. No person may engage in or work at plumbing in the state unless licensed to do so by the Department per s.145.06, COift(.~It stats. _ ~~®~ The following conditions shall be met during construction or installation and prior to occupancy or use: {~MENT Reminders oN ~~ ~ SEE CORRE • This system is to be constructed and located in accordance with the enclosed approved plans and with the component manuals listed above. • This plan has an approved Interpretive Determination (Transaction I.D. # 1217452) associated with this design. All of the conditions of that approval shall be upheld for the construction of this system. • Per manual cited above, limited activities are allowed in the area 15 feet down slope of the component area. Soil compaction, excavation, vehicular traffic and other similar activities that impact the treatment and dispersal are prohibited. The force main is to be installed in the down slope area, The trench for the force main may not be wider than 12 inches. Track type tractors or other equipment that will not compact the area are required. • The well must be a minimum of 25 feet from any POWTS tank, and a minimum of 50 feet from the absorption area. chs. NR 811 & 812c WII.LIAM C SCHUMAKER • A Sanitary Pemut must be obtained from the county where this project is located in accordance with the requirements of Sec. 145.135 and 145.19, Wis. Stats. • Inspection of the POWTS installation is required. Arrangements for inspection shall be made with the designated county official in accordance with the provisions of Sec. 145.20(2)(d), Wis. Stat • Comm 83.22(71 A couv of the approved plans, specifications and this letter shall be on-site during construction and oven to inspection by authorized representatives of the Department, which may include local inspectors Owner Responsibilities: • Comm 83.52 Responsibilities. The owner of a POWTS shall be responsible for ensuring that the operation and maintenance of the POWTS occurs in accordance with this chapter and the approved management plan under s. Comm 83.54(1). • Comm 83.52(2) A POWTS that is not maintained in accordance with the approved management plan or as required under s. Comm 83.54(4) shall be considered a human health hazard. • Comm 83.55 The owner is responsible for submitting a maintenance verification report acceptable to the county for maintenance tracking purposes. Reports shall be submitted at intervals appropriate for the component(s) utilized in the POWTS. All permits required by the state or the local municipality shall be obtained prior to commencement of construction/installation/operation. In granting this approval the Division of Safety & Buildings reserves the right to require changes or additions should conditions arise making them necessary for code compliance. As per state stats 101.12(2), nothing in this review shall relieve the designer of the responsibility for designing a safe building, structure, or component. Inquiries concerning this correspondence maybe made to me at the telephone number listed below, or at the address on this letterhead. The above left addressee shall provide a copy of this letter to the owner and any others who are responsible for the installation; operation or maintenance of the POWTS. Sincerely, Charles L Bratz POWTS Reviewer II ,Integrated Services (608)789-7893 , 7:45 am - 4:30 pm Monday -Friday charlie.bratz@wisconsin.gov Page 2 7/25/2006 Fee Required $ 175.00 Fee Received $ 175.00 Balance Due $ 0.00 WiSMART coder 7633' cc: Leroy G Jansky, Wastewater Specialist, (715) 726-2544 James K Thompson , A.C.E. Soil and Site Evaluations h~ c •~jq MOUND AND PRESSURE DISTRIBUTION COMPONENT DESI ~~~ /~d~~~`~ ~. Residential Application ~"~ ~ ~~/ INDEX AND TITLE PAGE `~~ ~ 2~~~v~, ~~r~~~ Project Name: Ray Kattre 3-bedroom residential mound ~~~'~ Owner's Name: Ray Kattre Owner's Address: 573 Co. Hwy J Hammond, WI 54015 Site Address: XX)CX 230th Ave. Legal Description: NW1/4NE1/4, Sec.9, T.31N., R.15W. Township: Forest County: St. Croix Subdivision Name: Forest Estates Lot Number: 4 Block Number: Parcel I.D. Number: pending Plan Transaction No.: Page 1 Index and title Page 2 Data entry Page 3 Mound drawings Page 4 Lateral and dose tank Page 5 System maintenance specifications.. Page 6 Management and contingency plan ~~r71dy Page 7 Pump curve and specifications Page 8 Site Plan Page 9 Interprative Eval. Report ' ~QM~t~~cE Page 10 D.O.C. Interprative Eval. Approval ,~"'`ry ~Ql~ SPQND,EN Designer: Bill Schumaker Date: 07/09/06 Signature: `/~~(~~ License Number: 227990 Phone Number: 715-386-3121 Designed Pursuant to the Mound Component Manual for POWTS Version 2.0 SDB-10891-P (N. 01/01), and SSWMP Publication 9.6 Design of Pressure Distribution Networks for ST-SAS (01/81) Version 3.0 (03/01101) Page 1 of 10 1y IVlound and Pressure Distribution Component Design Design Worksheet Site Inforn (r or c) ~R 300.00 1.50 450.00 i 6.00 ~_ 100.00 i ~ 6.00 0.20 ration !Residential or Commercial Design Estimated Wastewater Flow (gpd) Peaking Factor (e.g. 1.5 = 150%) Design Flow (gpd) Site Slope (%) Contour Line Elevation (ft) Depth to Limiting Factor (in) In-situ Soil Application Rate (gpd/ftZ) Distribution Cell Information j 112.50 Dispersal Cell Length Aiong Contour (ft) _ 1.00 Dispersal Cell Design Loading Rate (gpd/ftz) 1 Influent Wastewater Quality (1 or 2) Pressure Disribution Information (c or e) i c~ Center or End Manifold 0.00 Lateral Spacing (ft) 2 Number of Laterals 0.125 Orifice Diameter (in) (e.g. 0.25) 2.00 Estimated Orifice Spacing (ft) _ _ 2.00 {- Forcemain Diameter (in) 405.00 85.50 6.50 Forcemain Length (ft) Pump Tank Elevation (ft) System Head (ft) x 1.3 16.50 Vertical Lift (ft) 4.83 Friction Loss (ft) 27.83 Total Dynamic Head (ft) Lateral Diameter Selection in. dia. o tions choice 0.75 L_______ __ , _ _ 1.00 _ ~_ 1.25 _ ., x ~ x i 1.50 x 2.00 _ _._ _ .. . x y 3.00 x ' - _ Treatment Tank Information T 1200.00 Septic Tank Capacity (gal) Wieser Concrete ,Manufacturer Note: Sand fill (D) calculations assume a Table 83-44-3 in-situ soil treatment for fecal coliform of <= 36 inches. 4.00 Cell Width (ft) Are the laterals the highest~oint _ in the distribution ~__ _ _Y _ _ _j network? Enter Y or N If N above, enter the elevation. ~ft~ _ of the highest point. ~___________ _ 8.04 ft2/orifice .- _..- - Does the forcemain drain back? i __` Y _____.! Enter Y or N 66.06 Forcemain Drainback (gal) 35.40 5x Void Volume (gal) 101.46 Minimum Dose Volume (gai) 23.07 System Demand (gpm) Manifold Diameter Selection in. dia. o tions choice __ _._ 1.25 _ ~ 1.50 .__ -- 2.00 _ _ 3.00 Ga_I_lo_ns/Inch Calculator (optional) 800.6_4 Total Tank Capacity (gal) 36.00 Total Working Liquid Depth (in) 22.24 gaUin (en#er result in cell B49) Dose Tank Information Effluent Filter Information _... _ __, p ty (gal) PolyLok 4__~ __ __ __ ~ Filter Manufacturer 800.64 Dose Tank Ca aci `_~~~ i 22.24 Dose Tank Volume (gal/in) ~PL-525 Filter Model Number Wieser Concrete~`jjManufacturer Project: Ray Kattre 3-bedroom residential mound Page 2 of 10 Mound Plan View L Mound Component Dimensions Down slo a toe extension made. A 4.00 ft E 32.88 in H 1.00 ft K 13.17 ft B 112.50 ft F 9.25 in z 16.00 ft L 138.85 ft D 30.00 in G 0.50 ft J 9.59 ft W 29.59 ft 450.00 (ftz) Dispersal Cell Area 2250.00 (ft2) Basal Area Available 4.00 (gpd/ft) Linear Loading Rate 11.25 (ft) 1/10 B Obs. Pipe Placement Mound Cross Section View Aggregate Dispersal Area i- 1_ 1j 1 ~ .B :. 'Observation Pipe ' ~ ' Y~ ~ 4 fti j ~. .T -} -~ -/ Finished Grade 104.27 (ft) F 102.50 (ft) -- - Dispersal Cell ;~ Elevation _ .,,.,,,... G ~ ~ H ''..~~~f,. 2 .fff.,~.f. . atera Dispersal Cell : ~ ~• 103.00 (ft) L I Invert :~ : ~ ~ 6.0 % Site Slope Shading Key ~. ~ Dispersal Cell -Topsoil Cap ~ °• ~ 1.5 ft .• ; ;;; ;; ;; ;; ,; ;;'r 5• ~ •• ~' ~''~ ~ ~ ••' © ~~.., Subsoil Cap ~ ~ ,r ~ ~ •. ;:: ~'' ' •~••. '~ . '• ASTM C33 Sand :~ t ~ f•f' ~ ~; ; . ~ Tilled Layer ~ ~ 0.5 ft :; Typical Lateral •,• :,~~ 05 :•r:•r~ Aggregate ~ o ~ *--- A Project: Ray Kattre 3-bedroom residential mound 104.00 (ft) Contour Elevation /~'` Geotextile Fabric Cover -/ See lateral details on Page 4 for number, size, and spacing of F laterals. Laterals are equally spaced from the distribution cell's centerline in the distribution cell (Ax6). Page 3 of 10 ~. Center Connection Lateral Layout Daigram I P 'I IE- 7{ -~'E x12 I x12 ~I Laterals & foroe main of PVC Sch 40 (per CONIM Table 84.30-6) Holes drilled on t he bottom of the lateral. • =Turn-u p wl ba I Iva Ive or of ea n out pl u g equally spaced Number of Laterals 2 Orifice Diameter 0.125 in Lateral Diameter 1.25 in Orifice Spacing (X) 2.02 ft Lateral Length (P) 55.55 ft Orifices per Lateral 28 Lateral Spacing (S) 0.00 ft Orifice Density 8.04 ft2/orifice Lateral Flow Rate 11.53 gpm Manifold Length 0.00 ft System Flow Rate 23.07 gpm Manifold Diameter 0.00 in Total Dynamic Head 27.83 ft Forcemain Velocity 2.36 ft/sec Dose Tank Information Locking cover with warning label and locking device and sealed watertight Project: Electrical as per NEC 300 and -~ Comm 16.28 WAC ~ 4 in. min. Disconnect ~_ Tank component is properly vented E-- Alternate outlet location Wieser Concrete Ca aci 800.64 Volume 22.24 Manufacturer Gallons gal/inch A B C D Forcemain diameter ~ 2 in. Dimension Inches Gallons A 17.36 386.07 B 2.00 44.48 C 4.64 103.21 D ~ ~12.00~ 266.88 Total _. _ ... 36.00 800.64 ~3" Bedding under tankBedding under tank. _. __ Alarm Manuafacturer ' LevelArm Alarm Model Number ;DLV __._ --___ _ _ _ Pump Manufacturer .Goulds Pump Model Number',WE05H Pump Must Deliver 23.07 gpm at 27.83 ft TDH Ray Kattre 3-bedroom residential mound Weep hole or anti- siphon device P, ump off elevation (ft) ~--'- 86.50 Do• se tank elevation (ft) 85.50 Page 4 of 10 ~, Mound Svstem Maintenance and Operation Specifications Service Provider's Name Bill Schumaker Phone 715-386-3721 ___ POWTS Regulator's Name St. Croix County Zoning Phone 715-386-4680 Svstem Flow and Load Parameters Design Flow -Peak 450 gpd Maximum Influent Particle Size 1/8 in Estimated Flow -Average 300 gpd Maximum BODS 220 mg/L Septic Tank Capacity 1200 gal Maximum TSS 150 mg/L Soil Absorption Component Size 450 ftz Maximum FOG 30 mg/L Type of Wastewater Domestic Maximum Fecal Coliform >10E4 cfu/100 mL Service Frequency Septic and Pump Tank Effluent Filter Pump and Controls Alarm Pressure System Mound Ins ect and/or service once eve 3 ears Should ins ect and clean at least once eve 3 ears Test once eve 3 ears Should test month/ Laterals should be flushed and ressure tested eve 1.5 ears Inspect for ponding and seepage once every 3 years Miscellaneous Construction and Materials Standards 1. Observation pipes are slotted and materials conform to Table Comm 84.30-1, have a watertight cap, and are secured in as shown in the mound component manual. 2. Dispersal cell aggregate conforms to Comm 84.30 (6)(i), Wis. Adm. Code. 3. All gravity and pressure piping materials conform to the requirements in Comm 84, Wis. Adm. Code. 4. Tillage of the basal area is accomplished with a mold board or chisel plow. 5. The mound structure and other disturbed areas will be seeded and mulched to prevent soil erosion and help reduce frost penetration. Lateral Turn-up Detail Finished ••..........•. ............... Grade ~ :: ~ .: 6-8" Diameter Lawn ~ ~ Threaded Cleanout Sprinkler Valve Box ~ ~ Plug or Ball Valve Distribution ~ ~ Lateral Long Sweep 90 or Two 45 Degree Bends Same Diameter as Lateral Project: Ray Kattre 3-bedroom residential mound Page 5 of 10 Mound System Management Plan Pursuant to Comm 83.54, Wis. Adm. Code General This system shall be operated in accordance with Comm 82-84 Wis. Adm. Code, and shall maintained in accordance with its' component manuals [SBD-10691-P (N.Ot/01) and SSWMP Publication 9.6 (01/81)) and local or state rules pertaining to system maintenance and maintenance reporting. No one should ever enter a septic or pump tank since dangerous gases may be present that could cause death. Septic and pump tank abandonment shall be in accordance with Comm 83.33, Wis. Adm. Code when the tanks are no longer used as POWTS components. Septic or pump tank manhole risers, access risers and covers should be inspected for water tightness and soundness. Access openings used for service and assessment shall be sealed watertight upon the completion of service. Any opening deemed unsound, defective, or subject to failure must be replaced. Exposed access openings greater than 8-inches in diameter shall be secured by an effective locking device to prevent accidental or unauthorized entry into a tank or component. Septic Tank The septic tank shall be maintained by an individual certified to service septic tanks under s. 281.48, Stats. The contents of the septic tank shall be disposed of in accordance with NR 113, Wis. Adm. Code. The operating condition of the septic tank and outlet filter shall be assessed at feast once every 3 years by inspection. The outlet fitter shall be cleaned as necessary to ensure proper operation. The filter cartridge should not be removed unless provisions are made to retain solids in the tank that may slough off the filter when removed from its enclosure. If the filter is equipped with an alarm, :the fter shall be serviced if the alarm is activated continuously. Intermittent filter alarms may indicate surge flows or an impending continuous alarm. The septic tank shall have its contents removed when the volume of sludge and scum in the tank exceeds 1/3 the liquid volume of the tank. If the contents of the tank are not removed at the time of a triennial assessment, maintenance personnel shall advise the owner of when the next service needs to be performed to maintain less than maximum scum and sludge accumulation in the tank. The addition of biological or chemical additives to enhance septic tank performance is generally not required. However, if such products are used they shall be approved for septic tank use by the Department of Commerce. puma Tank The pump (dosing) tank shall be inspected at least once every 3 years. All switches, alarms, and pumps shall be tested to verify proper operation. If an effluent filter is installed within the tank it shall be inspected and serviced as necessary. Mound and Pressure Distribution Svstem No trees or shrubs should be planted on the mound. Plantings may be made around the mound's perimeter, and the mound shall be seeded and mulched as necessary to prevent erosion and to provide some protection from frost penetration. Traffic (ocher than for vegetative maintenance] on the mound is not recommended since soil compaction may hinder aeration of the infiltrative surface within the mound and snow compaction in the winter will promote frost penetration. Cold weather installations (October-February) dictate that the mound t>e heavily mulched as protection from freezing. Influent quality into the mound system may not exceed 220 mg/L BODS, 150 mg/L TSS, and 30 mglL FOG for septic tank effluent or 30 mg/L GODS, 30 mg/L TSS, 10 mglL FOG, and 104 cfu/100 mL for highly treated effluent. Influent flow may not exceed maximum design flow specified in the permit for this installation. The pressure distribution system is provided with a flushing point at the end of each lateral, and it is recommended that each lateral be flushed of accumulated solids at least once every 18 months. When a pressure test is performed it should be compared to the Initial test when the system was installed to determine if or~ce clogging has occurred and if orifice cleaning is required to maintain equal distribution within the dispersal cell. Observation pipes within the dispersal calf shall be checked for effluent ponding. Ponding levels shall be reported to the owner, and any levels above 6 inches considered as an impending hydraulic failure requiring additional, more frequent monitoring. Contins~encv Plan If the septic tank or any of its components become defective the tank or component shall be repaired or replaced to keep the system in proper operating condition. If the dosing tank, pump, pump controls, alarm or related wiring becomes defective the defective component(s) shall be immediately repaired or replaced with a component of the same or equal performance. If the mound component fails to accept wastewater or begins to discharge wastewater to the ground surface, it will be repaired or replaced in its' present {ovation by increasing basal area if toe leakage occurs or by removing biologically clogged absorption and dispersal media, and related piping, and replacing said components as deemed necessary to bring the system into proper operating condition. See Page 6 of this plan for the name and telephone number of your local POWTS regulator and service provider. Project: Ray Kattre 3-bedroom residential mound Page 6 of 10 ~~GOULDS PUMPS Single phase: • Built-in overload with automatic reset. • All single phase models feature capacitor start motors for maximum starting torque. •'h and'/z HP- 16/3 STTOW with 115, 208 and 230 Volt three prong plug. • 3/4-2 HP -14/3 STOW with bare leads. Three phase: • Overload protection must be provided in starter unit. •'/z-2 HP - 14/4 STOW with bare leads. ^ Designed for Continuous Operation: Pump ratings are within the motor manufacturers recommended working limits, can be operated continuously without damage when fully submerged. 3885 PROSURANCE AVAILABLE FOR RESIDENTIAL APPLICATIONS. APPLICATIONS Specifically designed for the following uses: • Homes • Farms • Trailer courts • Motets • Schools • Hospitals • Industry • Effluent systems SPECIFICATIONS Pump • Solids handling capabilities: '/a" maximum. • Discharge size: Z" NPT. • Capacities: up to 140 GPM. • Total heads: up to 128 feet TDH. • Temperature: 104°F (40°C) continuous 140°F (60°C) intermittent. • See order numbers on reverse side for specific HP, voltage, phase and RPM's available. FEATURES ^ Shaft: Corrosion-resistant , stainless steel. Threaded design. Locknut on three phase models to guard against component damage on accidental reverse rotation. ^ Fasteners: 300 series stainless steel. ^ Capable of running dry without damage to components. ^ Designed for continuous operation when fully submerged. MOTORS ^ Fully submerged in high- gradeturbine oil for lubrication and efficient heat transfer. ^ Class B insulation. METERS FEET 40 ~ 130 ~~ T-----r---.... EYSMt~I ~ 1zo --- -___+...__. 35~- ~ 1 ~ 110;'WE2 H ~ I 30r 100E-- _._ 90 L WE'I~FF----~-I-.. ^ Impeller: Cast iron, semi- w zs open, non-clog with pump-out = 80 vanes for mechanical seal a 201 70 protection. Balanced for ~ 60 smooth operation. Silicon a 15~ so bronze impeller available as o ~ I 40 an option. 2783io~- ^Casing: Cast iron volute type ?.~ ~ for maximum efficiency. 5 2" NPT discharge. ^ Mechanical Seal: SILICON oL CARBIDE VS. SILICON CARBIDE sealing faces. Stainless steel metal parts, BONA-N elastomers. _ rt r__ _ _ ;__... _._. + 1-- _ __.. _. _ - -+ _. -. _.. 20Fuutus~ ._ a.._.- I. 1 .. ~.._... -~-- 10 ~ 1' it ~ ......I _..... 00 10 20 30 40 i 1-- 1:x:._1 _ . _.: ...:..:~ . ~..~ _._ _t._ ~.___ _ _.__ 50 60 70 80 90 100 110 120 130 140 150 160 GPM p 10 15 20 25 30 35 m;/hr !~ Goulds Pumps zooz Goulds Pumps 4~~ ITT 111dUStl"12S Etfective October, 2002 www.goulds.com n0~ /O 63885 Submersible Effluent Pump ~~ ^ Bearings: Upper and lower heavy duty ball bearing construction, ^ Power Cable: Severe duty rated, oil and water resistant. Epoxy seal on motor end provides secondary moisture barrier in case of outer jacket damage and to prevent oil wicking. Standard cord is 20'. Optional lengths are available. ^ 0-ring: Assures positive sealing against contaminants and oil leakage. AGENCY LISTINGS S ~ ® Tested to UL 776 and CSA 22.2 108 Standards By Canadian Standards C US Association File #LR38549 Goulds Pumps is 150 9001 Registered. _. .. SERIES: 38 , _ ._ SIZE:'/+"SOLIDS ; -~'- - ___ ~ _ _ _ _ RPM 3500 & _r I _~17~0.. ... .. • ~~SGPM -{ ~ r I : 5 FT .__. -~ i - ~ --- - ~ ~ _ _., . . -;-- ~ . _._ .. ~ _. _ . _ -+--- r - _; ~_ . . _. _~ -_ I- -- ,. . - -- - ~---~- - - - - -..._.~.._ -f - - l , _ t . - - -- 1 + ^ ~ I -- ~ _. i .. .. .39(v.los~ Easy /o z`/~ne ~~ ~ , ~ U~ i 1._D f) SS u m t-ol t Ie J e /On. OD ~ ~ ~` % 3/goQ 3 ,~ SLo~C' 99.99." t 97~ ` 98.0' o `~ `, ~ ~, ~ ~ ` "S. `, ~ ~~ r ~ ~ ~ ~~~ GyJ.O ' l . ~ ~ ~ `` ~, ,\ ~ 8~ \ • ~, ~ Bi ~ ' ~CGNlR,%-i ~l'IS~r~L ~idr7 ~yiro ~!~ ~p/'o f~; 5~ Ee d !a„>err~e of meu..~N ~ ' ~ ,' , . ` , tr ~ nom.: s;t~ ~ e~ d~ ~ • ~s , ,4dd~"£'an ~%/ So.%S~a.///.C ; ~ ,~os'opz" d ~ I sue. ~1oP./.C. /G~ SCIc~C-d i/r~ ~ 1~0~~~ ~-'vrterrlo~ih Cc-•tCCtv~P Cu'GQ o~'fCc /!'Jolcv,d ~ ~ ~ ' ~ ~-'/% Sd c-s {~ ~c`d~~-E, a l/ Sui~a~c ', ', .Siaax c~~/ a/o cc.~d 6a ~~ e.,ds o~, ', ~e S,"fie . ~ '. ~ ~ ~. w L P t, a~/Btu C~ bz,a.~ %~, ~ ~. s.~.~,oc.~r Poty~KP~-sus e~'ik~~~,~it~ a~ . , ,~ ~^o ~ 3 '~OSror ~ bed^ e e J, ~t7 PropoaGC1 _~ ~ y W¢lll0cr~ior~ p~OP~s~ ~'~JL~°`/ • y8.8G ~ p', , ~~510?l ~ 99. ~~ • 99.~~ 37, s/opP - Y9.o' ~~,y8o, pd.~. 9~~~ `- % T. O' `jCa/e. / ~=f~~ e /ed4 ~o~ E,Y/S~~(~ {~nCe/~he ~~. b. . ~ ~~ede a~£ bQSt o~'Sue( ta~te.E/e~-= 99,/0' J ~. 0 M h ~ ~ h o~ ~ r~~.8 o~/D ~~ Interpretive Determination Report For an A+0" Mound Septic System On the Bernie Seidling property 10 acres Pending CSM from SE corner NW 1/4, NE 1/a, Section 9, T 31 N, R 15 W Proposed lot 4, Forest Estates Town of Forest St. Croix County, Wisconsin P.®.VIP.T.S. Submitted by C~r~ditg®nally V~D DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE DIVIS N CtF SAf ETY AND BUILDINGS ` E co ESPO ENCE Henry F. Grote, CSTM 222774 RECEIVED NOV 1 6.2005 SAFETY & BUILDINGS Certified Soil Testing, LLC E. 4366 353rd Ave. Menomonie, WI 54751 715-233-0398 .~ Contents Introduction Methods Local Hydrology Geomorphology Soil Disturbance and Hydraulic Modification Landscape Position Soil Series Data Conclusions/Recommendations . Attachments Soil Evaluation Report, Henry F. Grote Topographic Detail, Section 9, T 31 N, R 15 W Soil Series Map, Soil Survey of St. Croix County i Page 1 1 2 3 3 3 4 5 5 Interpretive Determination Report for an A+0" Mound Septic System on the Bernie Seidling Property, 10 acre pending CSM, proposed as Lot 4, Forest Estates Introduction On October 5, 2005 Henry F. Grote, CSTM 222774, Certified Soil Testing, conducted a Soil and Site Evaluation on the Bernie Seidling property for the purpose of establishing the potential for an onsite wastewater dispersal system. These evaluations were conducted on a proposed 10 acre parcel located in the southeast corner of the forty acre property described as the NW '/4 of the NE '/4 of Section 9, T 31 N, R 15 W, Town of Forest, St. Croix County, Wisconsin. Methods Soil color, texture, structure, consistence and redoximorphic features have been evaluated and reported on the accompanying Soil Evaluation Report in accordance with guidelines under Comm 85 of the Wisconsin Administrative Code. Pertinent information has been abstracted from the Soil Survey of St. Croix County, Wisconsin. Topographic detail has been obtained from the DeLorme 3-D TopoQuads CD mapping release. Field investigation included five backhoe pits with soil profiles documented on the attached Soil Evaluation Report. Rod and transit elevations were obtained at pit locations, along a tentative design contour line, and over twenty foot grid intervals to allow the insertion of nominal one foot contour lines on the detailed plot plan. Previous, l extensive work across the eighty acres of which this parcel is a part consisted of seventy-five soil pits. A general lack of A+4" conditions was noted at that time although occasional pits were constructed with 15-31" of suitable soils which included at least 4" of apparently non-seasonally saturated soils below the A horizon. The area described by this report is an area which appeared promising during the earlier work. ~ Henry Grote, Preliminary Soil Evaluation Reports, 5/12/99 and 8/14/00. The proposed site is immediately west of a site which was evaluated by an interpretive determination in 2003 and approved for an A+0" mound system. The soils and topography of the current site aze favorably comparable to the 2003 site. Local Hydrology The major local hydrology input is from annual precipitation. This is estimated at from 29.57 inches2 to 31.5 inches.3 Surface runoff is an additional input most significantly during heavy precipitation events. The proposed mound site and upslope land use is currently heavy weed growth. The upslope ground extends about 100 feet south and east of the proposed system area and can be expected to adsorb significant volumes of precipitation during the growing season when most of the precipitation occurs. Due to the exaggerated convex, nose slope orientation of the proposed site, upslope toe landscaping to divert surface runoff to the south and north is the preferred method of minimizing adverse impact on mound performance due to excessive surface drainage. Dense glacial till beneath a shallow loess cap provides significant groundwater protection from possible surface contamination. Water outputs consist of surface runoff, soil infiltration, and evapotranspiration. Surface runoff will generally be minimal unless frozen soil conditions or excessively heavy and prolonged precipitation occurs. Soil infiltration is described as "moderately well drained" for typical Freeon series soils.4 This is reasonable for the observed strongly structured silt loam and moderately structured sandy loam A horizons; the B horizons are generally weakly structured with textures varying from sandy loams to silty clay loams Restrictive, massive, sandy loam till units were observed at depths below 20 to 29 inches. Slower infiltration is anticipated during wet spring periods when the soils are closer to field capacity and slow to dry. The underlying massive till unit will be significantly restrictive to vertical infiltration. Lateral movement of water through more permeable upper horizons will be facilitated by the 3.0 to 5.0 percent cross slopes. Heavy and prolonged precipitation - 2.5 inches in 24 hours; described as once in two z Soil Survey of St. Croix County, United States Department of Agriculture, Soil Conservation Service, July 1987, p 139. (River Falls, WI data) s Wisconsin Average Annual Precipitation (1961-1990), www.crh.noaa.gov/mkx/data/wipcpn.gif ° Soil Survey of St. Croix County, United States Department of Agriculture, Soil Conservation Service, July 1987, p. 30. 2 years5 -will also slow infiltration as the A horizons near field capacity. Evapotranspiration will be a significant factor during the growing season but of no value during the winter season Geomorphology Limestone bedrock underlies most of St. Croix County. Typically the limestone is sandwiched between layers of sandstone which is then overlaid with glacial till forming the principal soil parent material. Cary till, correlated with the third sub-stage of Wisconsin glaciation, is the parent till for Freeon soils. The Cary till is overlain by a thin concurrent andlor post-glaciation loess cap. Soil Disturbance and Hydraulic Modification The proposed mound location is uniform topography. Land use was drilled soy bean crops in 2003, but soils are currently fallow with strong weed growth. Minimal recent tillage and significant root penetration have enhanced soil structure. The upper B horizon exhibited weak platy structure in one pit profile which is a possible artifact of tillage but is as likely a result of the natural deposition process of loess soils. Hydraulic conductivity of the solum can -and should be -improved by deep chisel plowing to a depth of at least sixteen inches. Landscape Position The landscape position of the proposed mound site is on the southern slope near the highest point of the west end of a glacial ground moraine. The proposed location, along the 100.0 contour, is located on Freeon soils in an extreme, classic "nose" landscape, convex orientation. The 100.0 contour is located on a small knoll which slopes north and west at 4-6% and southwest at 3-4% although the general slope of the moraine is to the south and west. The moraine rises to the east to a nominal elevation of 1240 MSL, about''/4 mile east of 290th St., almost %2 mile east of the 100.0 contour which is at a nominal elevation of 1214 MSL. Small scale cross slopes at the s Soil Survey of St. Croix County, United States Department of Agriculture, Soil Conservation Service, July 1987, p 140. proposed mound site are 3% to the southwest and 4-6% to the north, northwest, and south of southwest below the 100.0 contour. The moraine slopes from just above the 100.0 contour about 1/3 of a mile to the southwest and south to 1200 MSL. From below the 100.0 contour natural drainage is north about 75 feet to a shallow surface drainage feature which trends west then southwest, about'/4 of a mile, and into Wolf Creek at a nominal elevation of 1142 MSL. No structures are down-slope to interfere with lateral movement of effluent. The 3.0% to 6.0% slopes at the mound site will increase the hydraulic gradient and encourage lateral movement of treated effluent. Upslope surface runoff can -and should - be minimized by landscaping fill up- slope of the system. The upslope toe of the proposed system should be extended with additional fill such that surface runoff is diverted to the north and south and ultimately around the northeast and southwest ends of the mound. Soil Series The Soil Survey of St. Croix County maps the site soils as Freeon Series very close to the boundary of Santiago Series down-slope to the south. These soils are respectively described as "moderately well drained" (Freeon), and "well drained" (Santiago). Field observations of soil pits are in reasonable agreement with this mapping. Both series are Alfisols and Fine-loamy mixed Family; both subgroups are Typic Glossoboralfs. Field observations show redoximorphic features absent to depths of 7-20 inches in four pits representative of the proposed mound site. In one of these pits redoximorphic features were observed below 10 inches in the lower part of the A horizon. The B horizon redoximorphic features in the system area were typically few and faint but common and distinct in one pit below the observed A-2 redox features. In two of the four pits the upper 8-10 inches of the B horizon were clear of redoximorphic features (pits 1 and 3). These pit profiles add weight to the opinion that the proposed area will be suitable for a properly constructed mound system. Periodic soil saturation is indicated below 7 inches at the shallowest and, more generally, below 10-20 inches by these observations. 4 Data The soil and site evaluation report and data are similar to other sites which have received Department of Commerce approvals for A+0" mounds with a minimum of six inches of seasonally unsaturated soils in the upper A horizon. Examples include the Lisa Mosentine site, ID #636612, Anthony Ludwig site, ID #634143, Jon Mentink site, ID #787909, Tim Holldorf site, ID # 849265, and Karen & Keith Anderson site, ID #639788. Conclusions/Recommendations 1. Seasonally saturated soil conditions do not occur in the upper 7 inches of the soil profile as indicated by the absence of redoximorphic features. 2. The October 5, 2005 site work was preceded by several inches of precipitation, estimated at six inches some 36 hours earlier; while soil conditions prior to this event were relatively dry as indicated by prior work in this county, the unusually heavy precipitation leads to several observations supporting site suitability: 3. None of the observed soil horizons were at or near field capacity in the system area; while 4. A down-slope pit (pit 5) located 130 feet below the 100.0 contour, at an elevation of 97.3, showed an A horizon and a gleyed B horizon, both at field capacity, with common and many observed redoximorphic features; and 5. Side seeps of free water from large pores were observed in only one system area pit (pit 4) at depths of 31 and 33 inches; and 6. Vehicle access to the site over comparable soils and generally lower terrain was satisfactory with negligible surface slippage. 7. The A horizon is Mansell color 7.SYR 3/2 which indicates an organic matter content nominally of 25 g/kg in the range of 20-30 g/kg or 2.5 percent.6 This level of organic matter is indicative of relatively good drainage and aerobic conditions. 8. The relatively low level of organic matter indicated by the Mansell value of 3 would facilitate observation of high chroma redoximorphic features in the A horizon. The Tyler presentation, Reading Shallow Soil Saturation, 10/15/04, Ashland UW Ag Research Station. general lack of observation of these features in the A horizons is strengthened by the low organic matter content which lends further evidence to a conclusion that at least seven inches of soil is present which is not periodically saturated for more than seven days; while 9. Site conditions did allow the observation of redoximorphic features in one system area pit (pit 2) in the lower 3 inches of the A horizon and in the down-slope pit (pit 5) throughout the A horizon in spite of the darker Munsell value of 2.5; therefore 10. Additional strength is given to the lack of observation of redoximorphic features above seven inches. 11. No hydric soil indicators are present in the observed system azea soil pits; this conclusion is based on particularly careful review of the indicators for All Soils and Loamy and Clayey Soils; however 12. Pit 5, 130 feet down-slope of the system area, does meet hydric indictor F6, Redox Dark Surface, with a matrix value of 2.5 and a chroma of 1; this pit is located in the shallow surface drainage feature. 13. System area pits demonstrate root penetration to depths of 33-48 inches; such depths aze not expected in soils which remain saturated for significant time periods. 14. The site is acceptable for a mound septic system with a minimum of six inches of unsaturated soil for treatment and dispersal of treated wastewater effluent as allowed by Comm 83.44(3)(b) l . The six inches of natural soil will allow treated effluent to be assimilated into the subsurface without ponding on the ground surface. 15. Site preparation requires mowing and removal of as much vegetation as possible followed by deep chisel plowing to at least a 16 inch depth. 16. Additional fill landscaping soil shall be added to the upslope area of the mound structure filling the concave, upslope area between the northeast and southwest system ends. The final, settled slope of this landscape fill shall be at least 2% to the north and south such that any surface water will be diverted around the southeast end to the south and southwest, and around the northeast end to the north and northwest. ' Field Indicators of Hydric Soils in the United States, A Guide for Identifying and Delineating Hydric Soils, Version 4.0 (March 1998), p5 ff, 13 ff; & 20 ff; p 16 for F6 indicator. 6 +. ' 17. Mound construction requires 2.5 feet of ASTM C-33 sand lift immediately placed on the freshly plowed ground surface. Construction must take place under relatively dry conditions. This depth of sand creates an effective sand filter and can be expected to produce a treated effluent with less than 30 mg/I, of both BODS and TSS and fecal coliform concentrations of <10,000 cfu/100mL. 18. The rock cell in the mound structure shall be 4' by 112.5' for a linear loading rate of 4.0 gallons per day per foot for a three bedroom residence. 19. To ensure adequate system performance the recommended basal area loading sl~ll be obtained beneath the sand toe portion of the proposed mound system. The sand basal area loading must be a maximum. of 0.2 gallons per day per square foot which can be accomplished by extending the sand toe down-slope, 16.0' below the down-slope edge of the rock cell; adown-slope dirt toe width of 5' will give a total system basal area loading rate of 0.16 gallons per day per square foot. 20. The system management plan must provide adequate maintenance information to maximize the system longevity. Final authority for this site's approval rests with the appropriate regulatory authorities, the Wisconsin Department of Commerce and the St. Croix County Zoning Office. This report, conclusions and recommendations are the professional opinion of Henry F. Grote, CSTM 222774. 7 i. ~ ~ ~ ST. CROIX COUNTY O N v f r_ ~~ ~ . { n y .~ ~ ~, { _. ,. ry. I I ` ~ I ..i ' I f ~ . ; I y ~~ ~ 1 ,'ti I ~ } r' r ~~ 1 ~ I ~ ~~ ~ a5~ }-~s ' -` l 4 r 1i ti - _ . ~~ ~ s i~ - Y .r ~ 11 I I ~ S '• 1 ~ , - :. r - t , ~~, _ r f ~ ~ I I~ I' ~`'~ ' jf. t I ~ r N 'irl-i 35' _ ~wj~~' 549; 1 f _ j ~ ( a 3-P T nnn!}n~.d. ('n n. ri. .6r r^^ i ono n,.r ,._ ., v...._..... - ~ . m wvu ur, n~c VyV7V JVI1 Cl'C Uif[A: l'JI.J - - - -- _ - - ,~4• '• ~S~nS~~f SOIL EVALUATION REPORT Department of Commerce ~j~ /^~ga~itn Comm s5, Wis. Adm. Code Division of Safety and Buildings (~ ~, (~ ]) `~! #2333 Page 1 of 3 Certified Soil Testing, LLC ~"~ Attach complete site plan on paper not less than 8'/: x 1 inche in size. Plan must include, but not limited to: vertical and horizontal reference point (BM) direction and County St. Croix , percent slope, scale or dimensions, north arrow, and location and distance to nearest road. Please ri t ll i f i Parcel I.D. pending p n a n ormat on. Personal information you provide may be used for secondary purposes (Privacy Law, s. 15.04 (1) (m)). Reviewed By Date Property Owner Seidling, Bernard Property Location Govt. Lot NW1/4, NE1/4, S9, T31N, R15W Property Owner's Mailing Address Box 3006 Lot # 4 Block # Subd. Name or CSM# Forest Estates City State Zip Code Phone Number Eau Claire WI 54702 800-386-7969 ~ City ~ Village ®Town Nearest Road Forest 230Th Ave. I~ New Construction Use: ®Residential /Number of bedrooms 3 Code derived design flow rate 450 GPD ^ Replacement ^ Pubtic or commercial -Describe: Parent material loess over till Flood plain elevation, if applicable NA ft. General comments install 4' x 112.5' rock cell mound on 100.0 contour as upslope edge of rock w/ 2.5' sand fill w/ county/state and recommendations: approval for interpretive site determination for A+0" site Boring ^ Boring # ® Pit Ground surface elev. 100.0 ft. Depth to limiting factor 20 in. Soil Application Rate Horizon Depth in Dominant Color ll M Redox Descnption Texture. : Structure Consisten Boundary Roots GPD/ft2 . anse Qu. Sz. Cont. Color Gr. Sz. Sh. `Efr#1 •EtT#2 1 0-10 7.5YR 3/2 - sil 2 f sbk mvfr cs im .6 .8 2 10-20 7.5YR 4/4 - sl 1 m-c sbk mvfr gs lm .4 .7 3 20-36 5YR 4/4 f2f 7.5YR 5/3 sl 0 m mfr - if .2 .6 redox features become c2d below 26"; 1 f roots to 33" a Boring # ^ Boring ® Pit Ground surface elev. 99.4 ft. Depth to limiting factor 0 in. Soil Application Rate Horizon. Depth in Dominant Color Man ll Redox Description Q nt Texture Structure Consisten Boundary Roots GPD/ft= . se u. Sz. Co ; Color Gr. Sz. Sh. 'Efr#1 •Eff#2 1 0-10 7.5YR 3/2 - sil 2 f sbk mvfr cs im 6 .8 2 10-13 7.SYR 3/2 cid 7.5YR 3/4 sil 1 m sbk mvfr gs 1m .4 .6 3 13-18 10YR 4/4 c2d 7.5YR 4/6,5/2 sicl 1 m pl mvfr gs 1m 0 .2 4 18-32 lOYR 4/4 m2p 7.SYR 4/6,5/2 sicl 0 m mfr cs if 0 0 5 32-36 5YR 4/4 cep 7.5YR 5/3 5YR 4/6 sl 0 m mfr - if .2 .6 lacks A+4"; presumptive limit is 0"; H2 "redox" features are reticulated & likely decayed organic matter; 1 f roots to 36" Effluent #1 = BODS> 30 < 220 mg/L and TSS >3 < 150 mg/L 'Effluent #2 =GODS < 30 mg/L and TSS < 30 mg/L CST Name (Please Print) Signat e: CST Number Henry F. Grote 222774 Address Certified Soil Testing, LLC Date Evaluation Conducted Telephone Number E. 4366 353rd Ave. Menomonie, WI 54751 10/5/2005 715-233-0398 san-s3so pt.o~ioo~ FR01~1•:SCHUMAKER PLUMBING FAX N0. :7153863121 Jun. 29 2006 12: 21 PM P6 Property owner Seidlin ,Bernard Parcel ID#~.--~^-- - ~, 3 ~ J eoring p8pth to limiting factor ZO _ in. oil Applicadcn Rat Boring # 100 4 ft _ S PR Ground surface elev GS~DTft: '" ,:d y ,. ,~ ~f7(~' + ; ~M r~ Cb'riSSS~rid~,'~C+uricJ~9ry FtoOts •Eff#1 EH~i2_^ ~'. Horizon Depth ~ Do+-"~'tt`~Ftt A~ , , ~ ` '' 4 .7 1 0-12 7.5YR 3/2 ~ s! 1 f-m sbk mvfr cs lm _._ .. ~ 1 m sbk muff' Cs lm ~~ '4 ~ Z , 1Z-20 10YR 4/4 _ - _ __._ ,. _ - --~ --!~ 3 _ - L.-.. r-- -? 20.29 lOYR 4/4 flf 7,SYR 4/6,5/3 sl 1 m-t sbk mvfr gs ~ lm l .9 _-.~ ~- map 5YR 4/6 sl 0 m mvfr - lm ~ .2 .6 _..... - 4 129-53 7.5YR 4/4 7.SYR 5 3 ~- -- -l- ., ' _ - -, - .. _ -. -- -11 - - - .. ~ `` I - ~ _:. ..L.. ~ --~ .-_ 1-. ~.. . , ._ retlox Features become f2d below 24"; i m roots to 48°; occasional inclusions clay rich 5YR 4/4 s1 in Ha (almost sc!) Boring Boring # ~„~ plc Ground surface elev. 98 $..__ ft• Depth to Umrting factor 0_ in Soil Application Rat ~. n~iaterfce :8ounddry Roots GPl7/ft' _ Horizon t]eplh DomlrfantColOr I~~dbx l]"esefilp}ion T'~sxture Struetu[e: •E{#t1 Eff*2 in. Mansell 4u•.Sz• Cont. Colg Car. Sz> 5~. .. 1 0-7 7.5YR 3/2 - sil 2 f sbk mvfr ~ im ~ '6 j 'S ..... -- _,. _,. .. - --t~- ~. 2 7-11 ~ lOYR 4/4 t2f 7.5YR 4/6,512 sici 1 m sbk mvfr gs_~_lm~ + -._.. - - ~ _... - 0 !, 11-21 ' iOYR 4/4 c2p 7.SYR 4/6,512 lief 0 m mvfr cs Im ~ 0. _.-_--. ..... - 1 ., f3p 5YR 4/5 ~ 0 m mfr - I 1R1 .2 .6 4 21-36 SYR 4J4 7.5YR 5/3 ~ _.. ... ~',._-_ ',---- ,_ _ { -._, . _-_ __ . _. _. -.. -- ,.....-__ ~ - i --- -T_.... I?..._. _.. ,- -- -- ,~ hea rains, ~6" re ~ rted, ,',6 1ack5 A ~ ~"; presumptive limit is 0"; 1 rtt roots to 34"; H 4 is daY-dch & almost sCi, stile seeps @ 31 &33 ( W site work ! Boring ~ Boring # ,~ Pit Ground surface elev. 97.3_,. _ ft, Depth to limiting factor 0 in. Soil Application Rat ' ~: Horizon i Depth DomirientColor Radox Description Texture Stttictctfe dttsl3ti3hes Sbundary Roots GPDlfts - in, Munsetl Qu. Sz. Cont. Cola Gr. Si. Sh. "£~t l -l=fftt2 c1p 7.5YR 314 ell 2 f sbk mvfr cs ~ irn ~` •6 .8 I _.}~0-1~5 7.SYR 2.5/1 __ .. R 4 6 .- sil O m mvfr.... .---~ - I 0 ' -. ~ .. ---- Z 15 2b 7.5YR 5/2 map 5Y / _ ...._ __~-._ _ -- -...._. -- • i ....------- r -- --.._... lacks A+4" 0.3 has decayed roots humus; redox features become c2p 12-X5"; some water ppnded on surface, no side seeps but both profiles Cu? "Y field caDadty; ti~is plt In shallow surfce drainage feature Effluent #1 =GODS > 30 < 220 m9/L and TSS >30 5 150 mglL 'Effluent #7. = BO[} ~ 30 mg/L and T5S < 30 mg/L 'Chc Dcptn~ment of Cvmn[erce is an equal opportunity service provider [[nil employer. 1f"you need assistance ro access serricc~ ar need mstcriarl in an slternrdc format, please ~.r~ntact the department at G08.266-3151 Or' l'tY 6i)R•2(i4-8777 CerutiE4 `.;ai ~ esnM1:. •. ; r ~P,I ~~Rilli tk 07100] ~ # i ,. ..~ ~~ ~ s 4~ v~ .~- ,y ~ .. .y v ~ .: _ _ ' ~ ~ ,~ _ _. M s _ - :~ o .. ~ , 91 ~ ~ ~ ~. ~~~ I+I `~ ~, 1_ L.' S .... .. nn~ lJ ^. W: S --; ~ ~ ~ ,3 (? o ~---' s ..~ i. ~' d ~ ...~ - -~ N J ~- ~ ~ ~ ~ l~,y ~' fl ~t a ~ ~- ~{J i c./~ _. .~ f~ `~ ~ W ~- ~,. ~- d ,~ ~., _._9 "'.j' ~ ~ a ~ ~ ~~ ~ ..~- }; ... ~ ... --t V V ~ ~ ... ..,`_1 .../S iJ a ~..':_ ,,.. ..... ~'. ivo ~ O. ~, t /~ .~ ~ J ~ d : u o ~ ~:.~~ ~~. ~ ~ ~ ~~ ~~„ 4 ~~ -~~ s o ~. ~ ~ ~~~~ ~- ~ _ ir- ~u J ~- ~~ 9 ~l ~ ~Y --~1' ~ S ~ ~- ~° ~ ;~ - . ~ ~~ . . • ~ 'commerce.wi.gov ~scon~~.n Department of Commerce Safety and Buildings 4003 N KINNEY COULEE RD LA CROSSE WI 54601-1831 TDD #: (608) 264-8777 www. commerce.wi. gov/sb/ www.wisconsin.gov Jim Doyle, Governor Mary P. Burke, Secretary December O1, 2005 CUST ID No. 222774 HENRY F GROTE CERTIFIED SOIL TESTING E4366 353RD AVE MENOMONIE WI 54751 CONDITIONAL APPROVAL A7TN: POW7S Inspector ZONING OFFICE ST CROIX COUNTY SPIA 1101 CARMICHAEL RD HUDSON WI 54016 PLAN APPROVAL EXPIRES: NA Identification Numbers Transaction ID No. 1217452 SITE: Bernie Seidling Site ID No. 707600 Town of Forest, St Croix County Please refer to both identification numbers, NW 1/4, NE 1/4, S9, T31N, R15W above, in all corres ondence with the a enc . Lot: 4, Subdivision: Forest Estates FOR: Object Type: Soil Saturation Determination Regulated Object ID No.: 1051915 The submittal described above has been reviewed for conformance with applicable Wisconsin Administrative Codes and Wisconsin Statutes. The submittal has been CONDITIONALLY APPROVED. The owner, as defined in chapter 101.01(10), Wisconsin Statutes, is responsible for compliance with all code requirements. The following conditions shall be met during construction or installation and prior to occupancy or use: 1. Approval is hereby granted pursuant to s. Comm 85.60(2), Wis. Adm. Code, to estimate the depth to seasonal soil saturation based on an interpretive determination process. Approval of the interpretive determination negates the requirement in s. Comm 85.30(2)(b), Wis. Adm. Code to designate the ground surface as the highest level of soil saturation when redoximorphic features are less than 4 inches below the bottom of the A horizon. 2. The estimated highest level of prolonged soil saturation approved under this determination is 6 inches below grade. At least 30 inches of sand lift on top of 6 inches of unsaturated, in-situ soil is required for adequate treatment and dispersal. 3. The basal soil application rate for the mound shall be 0.20 gpd/sf, and the linear loading rate 4.0 gpd/ft. 4. Chisel plowing to a depth of 12-16 inches immediately prior to sand placement is required to improve vertical water movement into the soil solum. 5. Landscaping up slope of the mound shall be incorporated into the POWTS design to prevent surface water from concentrating along the up slope edge of the mound and to divert surface water drainage away from the system. 6. This approval shall remain valid unless the site is altered in such a way that the depth to soil saturation would change or if saturated conditions are observed for seven consecutive days at depths less than 3 feet below the infiltrative surface of the POWTS distribution component. 7. This approval in no way relinquishes the use of color patterns to estimate the depth to high groundwater on any other parcels or portions of parcels. 8. A copy of this approval letter and attachments must accompany the mound system design for this site for purposes of plan approval and sanitary permit issuance. If the Interpretive Determination Report was accompanied with a plan and an expiration date is shown on this letter, the expiration date only applies to the plans for the design, not to the decision on the Interpretive Determination Report. 4 `• ss HENRY F GROTE Page 2 12/1/2005 A copy of the approved plans, specifications and this letter shall be on-site during construction and open to inspection by authorized representatives of the Department, which may include local inspectors. If plan index sheets were submitted in lieu of additional full plansets, a copy of this approval letter and index sheet shall be attached to plans that correspond with the copy on file with the Department. All permits required by the state or the local municipality shall be obtained prior to commencement of construction/installation/operation. If this construction project will disturb one or more acres of land, an Erosion Control Notice of Intent (NOI) shall be filed with the department 14 days prior to any earth disturbing activities. In granting this approval the Division of Safety & Buildings reserves the right to require changes or additions should conditions arise making them necessary for code compliance. As per state stats 101.12(2), nothing in this review shall relieve the designer of the. responsibility for designing a safe building, structure, or component. Inquiries concerning this correspondence may be made to me at the telephone number listed below, or at the address on this letterhead. Sincerely, Leroy' (i. Vansky. P S, Wast ter Specialist Integrated Services Bureau (715)726-2544 Voice lj ansky@commerce. state.wi.us Fee Required $ 100.00 Fee Received $ 100.00 Balance Due $ 0.00 1ViSMART code: 763 4 . +~~{y 'commerce.wi.gov .~ ~ i~con~in Department of Commerce December O1, 2005 CUST ID No. 222774 HENRY F GROTE CERTIFIED SOIL TESTING E4366 353RD AVE MENOMONIE WI 54751 CONDITIONAL APPROVAL Safety and Buildings 4003 N KINNEY COULEE RD ,~ LA CROSSE WI 54601-1831 TDD #: (608) 264-8777 www. commerce.wi. gov/sb/ www.wisconsin.gov Jim Doyle, Governor Mary P. Burke, Secretary ATTN: POWTS Inspector ZONING OFFICE ST CROIX COUNTY SPIA 1101 CARMICHAEL RD HUDSON WI 54016 PLAN APPROVAL EXPIRES: NA Identification Numbers Transaction ID No. 1217452 SITE: Bernie Seidling Site ID No. 707600 Town of Forest, St Croix County Please refer to both identification numbers, NW 1/4, NE 1/4, S9, T31N, R15W above, in allcorres ondence with the a enc . Lot: 4, Subdivision: Forest Estates FOR: Object Type: Soil Saturation Determination Regulated Object ID No.: 1051915 The submittal described above has been reviewed for conformance with applicable Wisconsin Administrative Codes and Wisconsin Statutes. The submittal has been CONDITIONALLY APPROVED. The owner, as defined in chapter 101.01(10), Wisconsin Statutes, is responsible for compliance with all code requirements. The following conditions shall be met during construction or installation and prior to occupancy or use: 1. Approval is hereby granted pursuant to s. Comm 85.60(2), Wis. Adm. Code, to estimate the depth to seasonal soil saturation based on an interpretive determination process. Approval of the interpretive determination negates the requirement in s. Comm 85.30(2)(b), Wis. Adm. Code to designate the ground surface as the highest level of soil saturation when redoximorphic features are less than 4 inches below the bottom of the A horizon. 2. The estimated highest level of prolonged soil saturation approved under this determination is 6 inches below grade. At least 30 inches of sand lift on top of 6 inches of unsaturated, in-situ soil is required for adequate treatment and dispersal. 3. The basal soil application rate for the mound shall be 0.20 gpd/sf, and the linear loading rate 4.0 gpd/ft. 4. Chisel plowing to a depth of 12-16 inches immediately prior to sand placement is required to improve vertical water movement into the soil solum. 5. Landscaping up slope of the mound shall be incorporated into the POWTS design to prevent surface water from concentrating along the up slope edge of the mound and to divert surface water drainage away from the system. 6. This approval shall remain valid unless the site is altered in such a way that the depth to soil saturation would change or if saturated conditions are observed for seven consecutive days at depths less than 3 feet below the infiltrative surface of the POWTS distribution component. 7. This approval in no way relinquishes the use of color patterns to estimate the depth to high groundwater on any other parcels or portions of parcels. 8. A copy of this approval letter and attachments must accompany the mound system design for this site for purposes of plan approval and sanitary permit issuance. If the Interpretive Determination Report was accompanied with a plan and an expiration date is shown on this letter, the expiration date only applies to the plans for the design, not to the decision on the Interpretive Determination Report. ~ S1 HENRY F GROTE Page 2 12/1/2005 A copy of the approved plans, specifications and this letter shall be on-site during construction and open to inspection by authorized representatives of the Department, which may include local inspectors. If plan index sheets were submitted in lieu of additional full plansets, a copy of this approval letter and index sheet shall be attached to plans that correspond with the copy on file with the Department. All permits required by the state or the local municipality shall be obtained prior to commencement of construction/installation/operation. If this construction project will disturb one or more acres of land, an Erosion Control Notice of Intent (NOI) shall be filed with the department 14 days prior to any earth disturbing activities. In granting this approval the Division of Safety & Buildings reserves the right to require changes or additions should conditions arise making them necessary for code compliance. As per state stats 101.12(2), nothing in this review shall relieve the designer of the. responsibility for designing a safe building, structure, or component. Inquiries concerning this correspondence may be made to me at the telephone number listed below, or at the address on this letterhead. Sincerely, ~d' eroy,~nsky. P S, Wast ter Specialist Integrated Services Bureau (715)726-2544 Voice lj ansky@commerce. state.wi.us Fee Required $ 100.00 Fee Received $ 100.00 Balance Due $ 0.00 WiSMART code: 7633 .~i Interpretive Determination Report For an A+0" Mound Septic System On the Bernie Seidling property 10 acres Pending CSM from SE corner NW 1/a, NE 1/a, Section 9, T 31 N, R 15 W Proposed lot 4, Forest Estates Town of Forest St. Croix County, Wisconsin 1 2 ~. ~- ~ ~ P'~'~•~'~' Submitted by ~'a~~~i~~~~ia~~y ~~~~D DI:PGF:TS~E[5!z CAF GC~Pv1''JIEFt~E ClVI5 N OF SAFETY AND BUILDINGS ` - ~~~ co - ~s~o~ ~NC~ Henry F. Grote, CSTM 222774 RECEIVED Certified Soil Testing, LLC E. 4366 353rd Ave. NOV 16 ._2005 Menomonie, WI 54751 SAFETY & BUILDINGS 715-233-0398 Contents Introduction Methods Local Hydrology Geomorphology Soil Disturbance and Hydraulic Modification Landscape Position Soil Series Data Conclusions/Recommendations Attachments Soil Evaluation Report, Henry F. Grote Topographic Detail, Section 9, T 31 N, R 15 W Soil Series Map, Soil Survey of St. Croix County i Page 1 1 2 3 3 3 4 5 5 ~, Interpretive Determination Report for an A+0" Mound Septic System on the Bernie Seidling Property, 10 acre pending CSM, proposed as Lot 4, Forest Estates Introduction On October 5, 2005 Henry F. Grote, CSTM 222774, Certified Soil Testing, conducted a Soil and Site Evaluation on the Bernie Seidling property for the purpose of establishing the potential for an onsite wastewater dispersal system. These evaluations were conducted on a proposed 10 acre parcel located in the southeast corner of the forty acre property described as the NW '/4 of the NE '/4 of Section 9, T 31 N, R 15 W, Town of Forest, St. Croix County, Wisconsin. Methods Soil color, texture, structure, consistence and redoximorphic features have been evaluated and reported on the accompanying Soil Evaluation Report in accordance with guidelines under Comm 85 of the Wisconsin Administrative Code. Pertinent information has been abstracted from the Soil Survey of St. Croix County, Wisconsin. Topographic detail has been obtained from the DeLorme 3-D TopoQuads CD mapping release. Field investigation included five backhoe pits with soil profiles documented on the attached Soil Evaluation Report. Rod and transit elevations were obtained at pit locations, along a tentative design contour line, and over twenty foot grid intervals to allow the insertion of nominal one foot contour lines on the detailed plot plan. Previous,l extensive work across the eighty acres of which this parcel is a part consisted of seventy-five soil pits. A general lack of A+4" conditions was noted at that time although occasional pits were constructed with 15-31" of suitable soils which included at least 4" of apparently non-seasonally saturated soils below the A horizon. The area described by this report is an area which appeared promising during the earlier work. ~ Henry Grote, Preliminary Soil Evaluation Reports, 5/12/99 and 8/14/00. The proposed site is immediately west of a site which was evaluated by an interpretive determination in 2003 and approved for an A+0" mound system. The soils and topography of the current site are favorably comparable to the 2003 site. Local Hydrology The major local hydrology input is from annual precipitation. This is estimated at from 29.57 inches2 to 31.5 inches.3 Surface runoff is an additional input most significantly during heavy precipitation events. The proposed mound site and upslope land use is currently heavy weed growth. The upslope ground extends about 100 feet south and east of the proposed system area and can be expected to adsorb significant volumes of precipitation during the growing season when most of the precipitation occurs. Due to the exaggerated convex, nose slope orientation of the proposed site, upslope toe landscaping to divert surface runoff to the south and north is the preferred method of minimizing adverse impact on mound performance due to excessive surface drainage. Dense glacial till beneath a shallow loess cap provides significant groundwater protection from possible surface contamination. Water outputs consist of surface runoff, soil infiltration, and evapotranspiration. Surface runoff will generally be minimal unless frozen soil conditions or excessively heavy and prolonged precipitation occurs. Soil infiltration is described as "moderately well drained" for typical Freeon series soils.4 This is reasonable for the observed strongly structured silt loam and moderately structured sandy loam A horizons; the B horizons are generally weakly structured with textures varying from sandy loams to silty clay loams Restrictive, massive, sandy loam till units were observed at depths below 20 to 29 inches. Slower infiltration is anticipated during wet spring periods when the soils are closer to field capacity and slow to dry. The underlying massive till unit will be significantly restrictive to vertical infiltration. Lateral movement of water through more permeable upper horizons will be facilitated by the 3.0 to 5.0 percent cross slopes. Heavy and prolonged precipitation - 2.5 inches in 24 hours; described as once in two z Soil Survey of St. Croix County, United States Department of Agriculture, Soil Conservation Service, July 1987, p 139. (River Falls, WI data) 3 Wisconsin Average Annual Precipitation (1961-1990), www.crh.noaa.gov/mkx/data/wipcpn.gif ' Soil Survey of St. Croix County, United States Department of Agriculture, Soil Conservation Service, July 1987, p. 30. 2 years5 -will also slow infiltration as the A horizons near field capacity. Evapotranspiration will be a significant factor during the growing season but of no value during the winter season Geomorphology Limestone bedrock underlies most of St. Croix County. Typically the limestone is sandwiched between layers of sandstone which is then overlaid with glacial till forming the principal soil parent material. Cary till, correlated with the third sub-stage of Wisconsin glaciation, is the parent till for Freeon soils. The Cary till is overlain by a thin concurrent and/or post-glaciation loess cap. Soil Disturbance and Hydraulic Modification The proposed mound location is uniform topography. Land use was drilled soy bean crops in 2003, but soils are currently fallow with strong weed growth. Minimal recent tillage and significant root penetration have enhanced soil structure. The upper B horizon exhibited weak platy structure in one pit profile which is a possible artifact of tillage but is as likely a result of the natural deposition process of loess soils. Hydraulic conductivity of the solum can -and should be -improved by deep chisel plowing to a depth of at least sixteen inches. Landscape Position The landscape position of the proposed mound site is on the southern slope near the highest point of the west end of a glacial ground moraine. The proposed location, along the 100.0 contour, is located on Freeon soils in an extreme, classic "nose" landscape, convex orientation. The 100.0 contour is located on a small knoll which slopes north and west at 4-6% and southwest at 3-4% although the general slope of the moraine is to the south and west. The moraine rises to the east to a nominal elevation of 1240 MSL, about'/4 mile east of 290t" St., almost'/z mile east of the 100.0 contour which is at a nominal elevation of 1214 MSL. Small scale cross slopes at the 5 Soil Survey of St. Croix County, United States Department of Agriculture, Soil Conservation Service, July 1987, p 140. proposed mound site are 3% to the southwest and 4-6% to the north, northwest, and south of southwest below the 100.0 contour. The moraine slopes from just above the 100.0 contour about 1/3 of a mile to the southwest and south to 1200 MSL. From below the 100.0 contour natural drainage is north about 75 feet to a shallow surface drainage feature which trends west then southwest, about '/4 of a mile, and into Wolf Creek at a nominal elevation of 1142 MSL. No structures are down-slope to interfere with lateral movement of effluent. The 3.0% to 6.0% slopes at the mound site will increase the hydraulic gradient and encourage lateral movement of treated effluent. Upslope surface runoff can -and should - be minimized by landscaping fill up- slope of the system. The upslope toe of the proposed system should be extended with additional fill such that surface runoff is diverted to the north and south and ultimately around the northeast and southwest ends of the mound. Soil Series The Soil Survey of St. Croix County maps the site soils as Freeon Series very close to the boundary of Santiago Series down-slope to the south. These soils are respectively described as "moderately well drained" (Freeon), and "well drained" (Santiago). Field observations of soil pits are in reasonable agreement with this mapping. Both series are Alfisols and Fine-loamy mixed Family; both subgroups are Typic Glossoboralfs. Field observations show redoximorphic features absent to depths of 7-20 inches in four pits representative of the proposed mound site. In one of these pits redoximorphic features were observed below 10 inches in the lower part of the A horizon. The B horizon redoximorphic features in the system area were typically few and faint but common and distinct in one pit below the observed A-2 redox features. In two of the four pits the upper 8-10 inches of the B horizon were clear of redoximorphic features (pits 1 and 3). These pit profiles add weight to the opinion that the proposed area will be suitable for a properly constructed mound system. Periodic soil saturation is indicated below 7 inches at the shallowest and, more generally, below 10-20 inches by these observations. 4 Data The soil and site evaluation report and data are similar to other sites which have received Department of Commerce approvals for A+0" mounds with a minimum of six inches of seasonally unsaturated soils in the upper A horizon. Examples include the Lisa Mosentine site, ID #636612, Anthony Ludwig site, ID #634143, Jon Mentink site, ID #787909, Tim Holldorf site, ID # 849265, and Karen & Keith Anderson site, ID #639788. Conclusions/Recommendations 1. Seasonally saturated soil conditions do not occur in the upper 7 inches of the soil profile as indicated by the absence of redoximorphic features. 2. The October 5, 2005 site work was preceded by several inches of precipitation, estimated at six inches some 36 hours earlier; while soil conditions prior to this event were relatively dry as indicated by prior work in this county, the unusually heavy precipitation leads to several observations supporting site suitability: 3. None of the observed soil horizons were at or near field capacity in the system area; while 4. A down-slope pit (pit 5) located 130 feet below the 100.0 contour, at an elevation of 97.3, showed an A horizon and a gleyed B horizon, both at field capacity, with common and many observed redoximorphic features; and 5. Side seeps of free water from large pores were observed in only one system area pit (pit 4) at depths of 31 and 33 inches; and 6. Vehicle access to the site over comparable soils and generally lower terrain was satisfactory with negligible surface slippage. 7. The A horizon is Munsell color 7.SYR 3/2 which indicates an organic matter content nominally of 25 g/kg in the range of 20-30 g/kg or 2.5 percent.b This level of organic matter is indicative of relatively good drainage and aerobic conditions. 8. The relatively low level of organic matter indicated by the Munsell value of 3 would facilitate observation of high chroma redoximorphic features in the A horizon. The 6 Tyler presentation, Reading Shallow Soil Saturation, 10/15/04, Ashland UW Ag Research Station. 5 general lack of observation of these features in the A horizons is strengthened by the low organic matter content which lends further evidence to a conclusion that at least seven inches of soil is present which is not periodically saturated for more than seven days; while 9. Site conditions did allow the observation of redoximorphic features in one system area pit (pit 2) in the lower 3 inches of the A horizon and in the down-slope pit (pit 5) throughout 4 17. Mound construction requires 2.5 feet of ASTM C-33 sand lift immediately placed on the freshly plowed ground surface. Construction must take place under relatively dry conditions. This depth of sand creates an effective sand filter and can be expected to produce a treated effluent with less than 30 mg/L of both BODS and TSS and fecal coliform concentrations of <10,000 cfu/100mL. 18. The rock cell in the mound structure shall be 4' by 112.5' for a linear loading rate of 4.0 gallons per day per foot for a three bedroom residence. 19. To ensure adequate system performance the recommended basal area loading sl~ll be obtained beneath the sand toe portion of the proposed mound system. The sand basal area loading must be a maximum of 0.2 gallons per day per square foot which can be accomplished by extending the sand toe down-slope, 16.0' below the down-slope edge of the rock cell; adown-slope dirt toe width of 5' will give a total system basal area loading rate of 0.16 gallons per day per square foot. 20. The system management plan must provide adequate maintenance information to maximize the system longevity. Final authority for this site's approval rests with the appropriate regulatory authorities, the Wisconsin Department of Commerce and the St. Croix County Zoning Office. This report, conclusions and recommendations are the professional opinion of Henry F. Grote, CSTM 222774. 7 ^! i ~: f ~ ~~~a~~~n ` SOIL EVALUATION REPORT Department of Commerce ~n`5, ~aQ+~~r''ith Comm 85, Wis. Adm. Code Division of Safety and Buildings (~ ~, ~ \°/ . ,.MV .:.,,..~.,r.,~..-.~.~.~~ -~...x,,..,., #2333 Page 1 of 3 Certified Soil Testing, LLC a,s Attach complete site plan on paper not less than 8'/z x 1 inches in size. Plan must include, but not limited to: vertical and horizontal reference point (BM) direction and County St. Croix , percent slope, scale or dimensions, north arrow, and location and distance to nearest road. Pleas i t ll I f i Parcel I.D. pending e pr n a n ormat on. Personal information you provide may be used for secondary purposes (Privacy Law, s. 15.04 (1) (m)). Reviewed By Date Property Owner Seidling, Bernard Property Location Govt. Lot NW1/4, NE1/4, S9, T31N, R15W Property Owner's Mailing Address Box 3006 Lot # 4 Block # Subd. Name or CSM# Forest Estates City State Zip Code Phone Number Eau Claire WI 54702 800-386-7969 City ~ Village ®Town Nearest Road Forest 230Th Ave. New Construction Ilse: ®Residential / Number of bedrooms 3 Code derived design flow rate 450 GPD !^ Replacement ^ Public or commercial -Describe: Parent material loess over till Flood plain elevation, if applicable NA ft, General comments install 4' x 112.5' rock cell mound on 100.0 contour as upslope edge of rock w/ 2.5' sand fill w/ county/state and recommendations: approval for interpretive site determination for A+0" site Boring # LJ Boring ® Pit Ground surface elev. 100.0 ft. Depth to limiting factor 20 in. Soil Application Rate Horizon Depth in Dominant Color M s ll Redox Descrlption_ Texture Structure Consisten Boundary Roots GPD/ft2 . un e Qu. Sz. Cont. Color Gr. Sz. Sh. 'Eff#1 'Eff#2 1 0-10 7.5YR 3/2 - sil 2 f sbk mvfr cs lm .6 .8 2 10-20 7.5YR 4/4 - sl 1 m-c sbk mvfr gs 1m .4 .7 3 20-36 5YR 4/4 f2f 7.5YR 5/3 sl 0 m mfr - if .2 .6 redox features become c2d below 26"; 1 f roots to 33" a Boring # ^ Boring ® Pit Ground surface elev. 99.4 ft. Depth to limiting factor 0 in. Soil Application Rate Horizon Depth in Dominant Cofor M ll Redox. Description .Texture Structure Consisten Boundary Roots GPD/ft2 . unse Ou. Sz. Cont. Color Gr: Sz. Sh. `Eff#1 'Eff#2 1 0-10 7.5YR 3/2 - sil 2 f sbk mvfr cs lm .6 .8 2 10-13 7.5YR 3/2 cid 7.5YR 3/4 sil 1 m sbk mvfr gs 1m .4 .6 3 13-18 10YR 4/4 c2d 7.5YR 4/6,5/2 sicl 1 m pl mvfr gs 1m 0 .2 4 18-32 lOYR 4/4 m2p 7.5YR 4/6,5/2 sicl 0 m mfr cs 1f 0 0 5 32-36 5YR 4/4 c2p 7.5YR 5/3 5YR 4/6 sl 0 m mfr - if .2 .6 lacks A+4"; presumptive limit is 0"; H2 "redox" features are reticulated & likely decayed organic matter; 1 f roots to 36" * Effluent #1 = BODS> 30 _< 220 mg/L and TSS >3 < 50 mg/L `Effluent #2 = BODS < 30 mg/L and TSS < 30 mg/L CST Name (Please Print) Signat e: CST Number Henry F. Grote 222774 Address Certified Soil Testing, LLC Date Evaluation Conducted Telephone Number E. 4366 353rd Ave. Menomonie, WI 54751 10/5/2005 715-233-0398 SBA8330 (8.07/00) Property Owner Seidling, Bernard Parcel ID # pending - Page 2 * of _, 3 . ~ ` ,~ rin ^ B g 3 o Boring # ~ pit Ground surface elev. 100.4 ft. Depth to limiting factor 20 in. tion Texture Structure Consistence Boundary Roots i D e Soil Application Rat GPD/ftE Horizon Depth in. Dominant Color Munsell p escr dox R Qu. Sz. Cont. Cola. Gr. Sz. Sh. •Eff# ~ 1 0-12 7.5YR 3/2 - sl 1 f-m sbk mvfr cs lm .4 .7 2 12-20 10YR 4/4 - sl 1 m sbk mvfr cs im .4 .7 ~ 3 20-29 lOYR 4/4 flf 7.5YR 4/6,5/3 sl 1 m-c sbk mvfr gs lm .4 .7 4 29-53 7.5YR 4/4 m75YR 5/36 sl 0 m mvfr - lm .2 ~ .6 redox features become f2d below 24"; 1 m roots to 48"; occasional inclusions clay rich 5YR 4/4 sl in H4 (almost scl) rin ~! B g o 4 Boring # ~ pit Ground surface elev. 9$•$ ft. Depth to limiting factor 0 in. cription Texture Structure Consistence Boundary Roots D d Soil Application Rat # GPD/ftE Horizon Depth in. Dominant Color Munsell ox es Re Qu. Sz. Cont. Colt/ Gr. Sz. Sh: •Eff tt#2 1 0-7 7.5YR 3/2 - sil 2 f sbk mvfr cs lm .6 .8 2 7-11 lOYR 4/4 f2f 7.5YR 4/6,5/2 sicl 1 m sbk mvfr gs lm .2 ~ .3 3 11-21 lOYR 4/4 c2p 7.5YR 4/6,5/2 sicl 0 m mvfr cs lm 0 ~! 0 4 21-36 5YR 4/4 f7p5YR 5% 6 sl 0 m mfr - 1m ~ .2 ~ .6 lacks A+4"; presumptive limit is 0"; 1 m roots to 34"; H 4 is clay-rich & almost scl; side seeps @ 31 833" (heavy rains, ~6" reported, 36 hrs prior to site work Boring _' 5 , , Boring # ~ pit Ground surface elev. 97.3 ft. Depth to limiting factor 0 in. Soil Application Rat r i t Col a Redox Description Texture Structure- Consistence Boundary Roots GP D/ft' Horizon Depth in. o n n Dom Munsell Qu. Sz. Cont. Cola Gr. Sz. Sh. `Eff#1 'Eff#2 1 0-15 7.SYR 2.5/1 cip 7.5YR 3/4 sil 2 f sbk mvfr cs lm .6 .8 2 15-26 7.5YR 5/2 map 5YR 4/6 sil 0 m mvfr - - 0 I .2 I I I ~i lacks A+4"; 0-3 heavy decayed roots/humus; redox features become c2p 12-15"; some water ponded on surface, no side seeps but both profiles @ field capacity: this oit in shallow surfce drainage feature * Effluent #1 = BODS > 30 < 220 mg/L and TSS >30 < 150 mg/L 'Effluent #2 = BODs < 30 mg/L and TSS < 30 mglL The Department of Commerce is an equal opportunity service provider and employer. If you need assistance to access services or need material in an alternate format, please contact the department at 608-266-3151 or TTY 608-264-8777. Certified Sal Testing, LLC SBD-8330 (R.07/00) ~- d- ~ ~- 1~ 0 , ~ ~ ~ 9 ~ - ~ ~ __ .s,. a,'~ ~ ,~ ~ ~ ,d'. t _ ~, ^ _. v, .. _.... 0~ S ~ ~ ~; '3 4 ~ r ~, d" ~ ~' ----~- N ' J ,_ ... _ ,~ fS ~_ ~- W ~ ~ s fl l~ ~e ~ ~ ~~ _4 o ~. $ d d' ~ --I" ~ cA O ~1. ~ ~ .. V J , J b '. ~xv„I ~ -. ~..... ~ .. .„. ~:. ~ ~. ~~ ~ o ~ ~~~~~~,~~ ~ ~ ~~ d ~~ ~~,-~ S 0~ ~~ ~~ J 1-~- ,~~ ~~ 1 t k ~ ~ i , O N v f ~m 0 0 ST. CROIX COUNTY ~~ ~I1J ~'\ f3 ~ CCv ~ C] `~'O I F .o~ I 1 ~ ~ ~ '~ ~ i N ~ IgSt-12 ` 11 ' i ~ f u?' ~ ~ ' ~ ~ I ' ~ ~ I f '~ f r, '' ~~ 1 l ~ ~ I 1I ~ ~ i ~', ~~ rr ~:, ~ 1 4~ ~ , ~ n n E '~~~ .~ ~ . ~ t~ ,r` 1 (• ] ,. ~. '~~ ~ ~, t, ( f ' I - - I I -- - r ' ~I 1 y} !~ I \ I '~~ 'I i ~~ i ~ _ i I ~ I 45°-79=i 5' `; i "_. 4 ~~ ~~ ~ - ~ .. ~ ,- ii , ~ti r ,` ~ ~~~" .r , kti- r~' 4 I rl - . t ~; 1 , 1 ~ ! +` ~~- + Y O f -., ti ~ I - ~ f r , i _ i ~ , ' `~ 'f~` S ~ ~' ~ ~ ~ - ' '' 4\ ' r' I T , .. ~f~ ._ _.. S5 "~ - ~ _ - ~ - ~~~; ~ fV Y-A~i:25' ~1 \ I i ~ -... ~ ~ r'', it ~} - _ r _ i ~5 ~; -`. rfr y ` - y rf i ~ i i~ 4~ ~ ~ t . I• '. ' 5 ~ i -- - _ ~ -_ 3-~ T OpO~pii(~S CODYrif? ~. u hf',C^: 19~911ri nrmn VwHm....t6 n { .TP n,mn[ r,... _.._ n_... row. ~. _ _ _ ;Lx ,. ~ 197 ... .. ...~., v..~.« va.n. Novo ...--- -..- ... . ......... ....---.. .. :...--°--.:- _ sT. cROix car~NTY SEPTIC TANK MAINTEN.AIVCE AciREEMENT AND OWIVEI~SI:IIP CERTIFIC.~TIf~N FORM Owrter/I3uyer ___~a~-, Mailing Address S'73 Property Address City/State {Verification required from Plart}ing & Z~naing Department for stew construction. j LE ~AL DEF.. ~C TPTION Parcel Identification dumber e,ti~rx~-v~. Property L~ocation~l~'/4 , ,~~ 3~4 ,Sec. ^~. 'I' .~l ?,,1 ~~.~w, Town of _~ok>os~ Subdivision ~ ,-~~~ ~_',~ ~ ~~. .... ,Lot # ~_-• Certified Survey 1\iap # . - .___. ~~-_ ~^, Volume ~ ,Page # -..-~. _-- ., Volume ~~ ,Page # ___...___ Spec house yes ttuk Lot lines identifiable yes} no Sir STEM MAINTENANCE AND (JV4'IY R C~RTI~~AT~IO~N Improper use and maintenance otyour septic system cpuld result to its premature failtue to handle wastes. Proper maintenance consists of pumping out the septic tank everv three years or soauer, if deeded, by a licensed pumper. What you put into the system can affect the function of the septic tank as a treafiient stage in the waste disposal systent. Owner maintenance responsibilities are specified in §Comrri. 83.52(I) a3xd iti Chapter IZ - St. Croix County Salutary Ordinance. The property owner agrees to submit to St. Croix County Irlatttting 8r ,7onng Department a certification form, signed by the owner and by a master plutrtber, journeyman plumber, restricted plumber or a licensed pttmper verifying that {1) the on-site wastewater disposal system is in proper operating conditiun and;'or {2) after utspectiou and pumping (if necessary), the septic tank is lass than I'3 full of sludge. i/we, the undersigned have read the above requirements and agree to maintain the private sewage dispose! system with the standards set forth, herein, as set by the Department of Cvtnmerce and the Department of rlawral Resources, State of Wisconsin. Certification stating that your septic system has been maintained must be completed and returned to the St. Croix Catvnty Planning & Zoning Department within 30 days of the three year expiration date. Iiwe certify that al! statements on this form are krue to the best of myraur knowledge. Irwe am/are the oumeris} of the property described above, by virtue of a warranty deed zecorcled fn Register of deeds Office. Number bedrooms ~~ SIGNAT'C7RE OF APPLIC"A.NT(S) ~r`. ~! DATE ***Any information that is misrepresented may result in the sanitary permit being revoked by the Planning & 7.onirg Department. *~`* Include with this app.liration a recorded warranty deed from the iegister of Deeds Offico and a copy of the certified survey map if reference is made in the warranty deed. Atta ° w ~_ I- Z w o ~ _Z ~ J W U u_ ` ARTCRAFT ' ._ ......._ i0 0 ~ o o ~ ° in ° :~ c~ 0 M J Q 0 ° ~~- N ti J } z 0 a ° ~ ~ ° I ° ~~ .. ~~~ ~ood~alH~n „b-,LZ .° RETAIL CUSTOMER AND BUILDER This is a CUSTOM DESIGN PRINT with nominal dimensions. This plan is subject to additional engineering review and may require changes as a result. Local building codes may require some alterations to this plan. The addition of options may also require alterations. This plan cannot be confirmed or built until this copy is returned with the signature of both the customer and the builder. Signature confirms acceptance of this plan as presented. Changes to this plan may require additional changes. J~'n'~i~ Production No. 40767 o O O o ~w~ ~ 4 o ~ Q z ~ ~ ~ ~ ~--~ ° ~ m ~ 4~ ~a~~ ~~ ~ ~ o,w Q V v~ m 0 ~ ~~ o ~~~ U N ~ ~ '~, a ~ M l1') X tl7 C7 CV ~--+ o C~ w ~ C/~ ~.r~ w 'mot ~~ o ~~ V ~ ~ ~~w~ ° NV~ o~~-w ~ `r' Q O ~ ~, UQ~c~ ~~~~ ~~ rPt ° ° ~-~urn : Gre~fi Pl~i ns QUIT CLAIM DEED Four Star Properties, Inc. quit-claims to Raymond Kattre this 3f d day of June, 2006, the following described real estate in the State of Wisconsin: 83 1 983 // KATHLEEN H. MIALSH REGISTER OF DEEDS ~'~ ST. CROIX CO.. WI -- RECEIVED FOR RECORD 08/11/2@06 10:30AM AUIT CLAIM DEED EXERT ~ REC FEE: 11.00 TRANS FEE: 105.00 COPY FEE: CC FEE: PAGES: 1 Lot # Four (4) of Forest Estates as recorded in document # 816565 in Vol. 10 of plats page 94, being located in NW '/4 of NE i/., 9-31N-15W, Forest TownsWp of St. Croix County, Wisconsin. This quit-claim deed given in satisfaction of a land contract effective on 5!3!06 by and between Four Star Properties, Inc. and the above named grantee. Tax parcel part of: 14-1020-10-050 ~ ~,~ ~ ~ ' '~` `~~ /~ G~ 6 This is not homestead property. / / ~ TOGETHER with all the tenements, hereditaments and appurtenances (if any) thereto belonging or in anywise appertaining. This quit-claim deed is subject to adverse possession, prescriptive easements, encroachments, easements, restrictions, right of ways and roadways of record, limitations and zoning ordinances of record if any and any liens or defects caused by the ad or omission of grantee. Four Star Properties, Inc., by Bernard Seidling, President Personally came before me of even date the above named Bernard Seidling to me known to be the erson who executed the foregoing instrument and acknowledge the same`~~~~NE'M~~~~`~ :~``J~'N E~C ~~~~'s _y • o'~ARy . s = -~: No blic-my commission expires on ~~} I ~ I~- ZD~4. s - `~ -f C ~* • \V '?~ Drafted by: Bernard Seidling . , LOCATION BKlTCN COUNTY PLAT OF: DOG$k g ~ 6 565 L[OCND~ OWNER rounmrnnaw,ES.i FOREST ESTATES °ao° x~~«.4 aeomeas4rr .a naaooe "~"°'°°"° N LOCATED IN PART OP TN! NWiM OP TNC N!1/4, AND IN PART OP TNC N!7/4 OP TNe Ea ~ r~~(jhy ! Nwrova ~ N!1/4 OP BICTION E, T81 N, R1 {W, TOWN OP POR!!T, 8T. CROIX COUNTY, WIBCONlIN; INCLUDING LOT 4 OP ClRTIPI[D SURVlY MAP pLCORDlD IN VOLUM! 17, PAO! 4170 AT ~ ~ti ~ w nox ro..a L r` O w uv ~ ~ SURVEYOR ew,wcnwxN ~~ "~D~~AN°'~ «' ~ TN! BT. CRO!( COUNTY R{GIlTlR OP DlCDB ORICE aa ~ 'm , e wm w~Mwrr awx~ $ ~Y~ wm ,~+ x. .ao.«tw...u~.n.xo.,wa can.n~.,wrxwm,m e s. ene,a ... ~r ow uc x.w. "~ naxe narr„N ,i ~~ b r .•o ,--x .gGONgry / p~ p33 m.,, a.~mw~.,K~. - ,rxuw..Nmcrnra. ~ ~ ~":* l'r/ ~ ~6n 8 I mo.>n,e,mxamrn.ewxo ~ ,xa tali'-,~' 9 ! yew `/i ~ E ~ ~.ffi.17.OIX ~ ~ rM ~ ~ ~~~ urcxm,c,n ~ T®. 474E __ _ ~• gyp. .xowxa.ao,%cx J - -' 230TFI AVEM E NErwsrE Em.+r "- -- - --- _- _- xw•xurrta.nawi. ___- ----_-__ N x~x~cwu P ~!a•M'aa'lNIS2.__._-__-_ ___}___-____~ __ _ __ __ __ _ _ _ __ _-xrmr.~~,. p~~__ __ __ __ __ _ ~.1y r,svc+nm - - -l P _ xrwvem.n -- ~ _ h __ __ _ .. i I_ ~ I ~ LOST 1 s arrcao.n. ~ aI - ~~» 6`J ~ ~ LOT'S o St ~ ~ 6~ e - o i `w.Z~g ~ p pp rormui[~ms ¢~mwi+mE& k ~".'~~.6'_.2!.. G~ ~ ~~ ~ LOT 2 .a ~~I <~~~ " e¢ romwaies os~~rowrao,rm ~ 9 A ~ N t09.a0 - -. _ _ - - - nEBxnfuw,ro<+,a~ k _ _ _ _ _ _ ® srua~wa ~ __ __ ~I i NEr+E~Ea'lT+E.oa '~ ~ i e~ ronawnax ~~ xrau« a a noN U+as, ~ '~ ~ ~ i ~ ~ ~ a e~ ,~ € ~ LOT 3 `¢ NACSS 5 n»orv,u,.Nes~.~,.m~m i N~aA'-E a:e,aww~ a ~~ rranam-a_.a~ixa~ ~~ ~~~ EOALE IN !!R 1' ~ 10a'~ td0 0 ,W vrn.. lIIEiT 1 O~ E fNE[TE ~,.r .~.w .... ~ : i sEraviaw saaaEe ,anx~r,x,x~zo - ~xxmao.~~rnww.wnixwr~ __ ______.~._~.__._~.M uco~, ~l