The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About038-1040-50-175 Wisconsin D;apartment of Commerce SOIL EVALUATION REPORT Page I of Division of Safety and Buildings in accordance with Comm 85,Wis. Adm. Code County Attach complete site plan on paper not less than 8 1/2 x 11 inches in size.Plan must J'�tl r include,but not limited to:vertical and horizontal reference point(BM),direction and Parcel I.D. percent slope,scale or dimensions,north arrow,and location and distance to nearest road. — Please print all information. R iewed b Date Personal information you provide may be used for secondary purposes(Privacy Law,s.15.04(1)(m)). C� U Property Owner Property Location Q )n C'/ Govt.Lot 1/4 s��1/4 S T N R E(or Property Owner's Mailing Address Lot# Block# Subd.Name or CSM# Ci to Zip Code Phone Number ❑ i y ❑Village Town Nearest Road f C Y 2)" ( 3 71 f 0c, t6 New Construction Use: Residential/Number of bedrooms Code derived design flow rate ,y�0 GPD ❑Replacement ❑ Pub/li�oar commercial-Describe: Parent material U'tGz-G c lood Plain elevation if applicable _ ft. General comments RECEIVES.) and re � ons: d lr>✓��ri /fi e ;rL9 J� M 2 8 20CI ST OIX COUNT'r Boring# tt 11 ZONING OFFICE pit Ground surtace elev. imi ng actor_�in. Soil Application Rate Horizon Depth Dominant Color Redox Description Texture Structure Consistence Boundary Roots GPD/ftz in. Munsell Qu.Sz. Cont.Color Gr.Sz.Sh. 'Eff#1 'Eff#2 4 6-1L Boring# ❑ Boring �Nj pit Ground surface elev._`Zz �ft. Depth to limiting factor 7 °j� in. Soil Application Rate Horizon Depth Dominant Color Redox Description Texture Structure Consistence Boundary Roots GPD/ftz in. Munsell Qu.Sz. Cont.Color Gr.Sz.Sh. 'Eff#1 •Eff#2 o� Z� Effluent#1 =BODS>30<220 mg/L and TSS>30<150 mg/L Effluent#2=BODS<30 mg/L and TSS<30 mg/L CST Name(Please nt) f Si a re CST Number >' e,S Address Date Evaf ation Conducted Telephone Number SBD-8330(R07/00) Property Owner Parcel ID# Page of Boring# ❑ Boring pit Ground surface elev.�ft. Depth to limiting factor in. Soil Application Rate Horizon Depth Dominant Color Redox Description Texture Structure Consistence Boundary Roots GPDfft2 in. Munsell Qu.Sz. Cont Color Gr.Sz.Sh. 'Eff#1 'Eff#2 1) W-219;,4�E Z, L.- 00� ❑ Boring# ❑ Boring ❑ pit Ground surface elev. ft. Depth to limiting factor in. Soil Application Rate Horizon Depth Dominant Color Redox Description Texture Structure Consistence Boundary Roots GPD/ft2 in. Munsell Qu.Sz. Cont.Color Gr.Sz.Sh. 'Eff#1 'Eff#2 ❑ Boring Boring# Ground surface elev. ft. Depth to limiting factor in. El pit Soil Application Rate Horizon Depth Dominant Color Redox Description Texture Structure Consistence Boundary Roots GPDfft2 in. Munsell Qu.Sz. Cont.Color Gr.Sz.Sh. 'Eff#1 'Eff#2 'Effluent#1 =BODS>30<220 mg/L and TSS>30<150 mg/L 'Effluent#2=BODS<30 mg/L and TSS<30 mg/L The Department of Commerce is an equal opportunity service provider and employer. If you need assistance to access services or need material in an alternate format,please contact the department at 608-266-3151 or TTY 608-264-8777. SBD-8330(R.07/00) Soil Test Plot Plan Project Name Norman Mante Byron B Jr. Address 1041 220th ave New Richmond Wi. 54017 CST 220527 Lot------ Subdivision -------- Date5/512002 CountyST. CROIX SW 1/4SE 1/4S9 T 31 N/R18 W Township StarPrairie Boring Q Well PL Property Line# Alt.BM base of PL on pipe Elv.96.6 ,BM or VRP Assume Elevation 100 ft top of pl stake System Elv. 87.6 H.R.P. same as BM 660 ` PL 1 ' PL 220th st \B3 20' �, B 90' 89' B2 100' ' 30 BI 5 90 PL ro ST. CROIX COUNTY WISCONSIN DEPARTMENT ST.CRODC COUNTY GOVERNMENT CENTER i r ....r, 1101 Carmichael Road Hudson,WI 54016-7710 Phone: (715)386-4680 Fax(715)386-4686 Memo to File From Pam Quinn Date. 4/27/2004 Re: Sandy loam structure misinterpretation on subdivision soil reports Recent soil on-site determinations have brought a problem to our attention. During these on- sites,borings were excavated to confirm soil conditions where two conflicting soil reports had been submitted for zoniflA department review. The soil profiles, evaluated by myself,Dave Fogerty,and Dave Steel(all certified soil testers)differed from the original soil reports in that massive(structureless)sandy loams were encountered in horizons that were described as having either moderate,medium subangular blocky(2msbk) structure by Adam Schumaker or weak, medium granular structure(1 mgr)by Shaun Bird. There apparently has been a misunderstanding between"structure"caused by handling samples of the soil during texturing versus the soil characteristics in situ. The soil, when chunks were taken out of the profile to hand texture,with pressure parted into "crumbs"that appeared at first to be subangular or granular in shape. However,these were not true peds that broke apart along planes of weakness,but fragments created by handling. The soil when observed in the horizon did not have distinct units of structure and should have been reported as"massive". Added notation: on 4/23/04 Mark Iverson(Cedar Corp. certified professional soil scientist), Shaun Bird, and myself did an evaluation of soils on Lots 6 &9, Richmond Meadows where the original soil report described the third horizon as sandy loam, "I mgr". On Lot 6 we checked soil profiles within a POWTS distribution cell and then excavated a test pit on Lot 9. The sandy loams in question were a weak, coarse to very coarse subangular blocky structure, where planes of weakness were just discernible when peds were parted from the profile. The peds separated with vga li pressure by soil tester. Sand coatings were observed on the ped faces in the Lot 9 soils,which supported the determination that some structure existed to allow water to move through the upper portion of the sandy loam horizon. However,below the weak-structured soil we found massive(structureless)sandy loams and the boundary between these horizons was irregular,which would mean a distribution cell could encounter alternating weak and massive sandy loam. Shaun said he would amend his soil reports with a memo recommending that any sandy loams he identified as"I mgr"or"2 mgr"be assigned a lower loading rate of 0.3 gpd/ft2 (see attached memo for Whitetail Meadows)to provide a larger dispersal area. a , Page Two—Soil Memo 4/27/04 Massive sandy loams have been assigned a soil application rate of 0.2 gpd/ft2 with the code changes in Comm 83.44-2 effective as of 2/1/04. The application rates listed on the soil reports g � PP P were higher due to the structure having been described as either weak or moderate, which affects the calculations for sizing of POWTS distribution cells. Obviously, one of the concerns is to make sure loading rates for the soils are not in error and allow undersized POWTS to be installed. For example, in December 2003, Lot 35 of Richmond Meadows subdivision had to have its loading rate reduced to 0.3 gpd/sq. ft. when the installer encountered massive sandy loam at the system elevation. The sandy loam horizon had been described on the soil report as "I mgr"with firm consistence. Leroy Jansky, Dept. of Commerce Regional Wastewater Specialist, has been consulted on this situation and advised the zoning department to require on-site verifications for any lots with this potential misinterpretation on the soil reports. All soil reports with sandy loam"1 or 2 mgr"as its structure will be required to use a design based on the current code's soil application rate for massive sandy loam @ 0.2 gpd/sq. ft. unless additional soil testing proves otherwise. Z 13 • 66ii—�73C6 VOL 16 PAGE 4325 KATHLEEN H. WALSH REGISTER OF DEEDS ST. CROIX CO., MI p RECEIVED FOR RECORD C N 06-26-2002 2:50 PH 0 j J CERTIFIED SURVEY NAP REG FEE. 13.00 $ COPY FEE: M $x rn PAGES: 2 O Z Z °2 z m 2 v M a � T � T Q�p � a o� .a Z co 93 Z S m z S i I M ~ z BEARINGS ARE REFERENCED TO THE SOUTH LINE OF THE SE1/4 OF SECTION 9. ASSUMED TO BEAR S89°551331W. � m 11 � 8 I � OMJn ly]CD C3�7 Pf�La4 u CG3 M O -------------------------- 33' 33' --- C a N00013'12WV 524.27' G 33.00' 425.99' 85.28' ca 0 491.2T Z Qo I r�II Zit -4 0, I i � v i �l O a v+ rn M. w C57 44h .91i 1w. mmL OC � NNq rn N►�� N � I 00 -- N I Q O m I I 1 C m I I^ \ww Vv . v 33.00' 491.2T Q SOO°13'12"E 524.27' 0 1 * MOT [7 _ I MOdo 9Q PC- o_49�� Z Z Zcl to O M APPROVED ? n' m ST.CROIX COUNTY Q C8,, Pfanninq Zonlnp and Parks Committee a Z C = g JUN 2 6 2002 rn M 'T> If not recorded within 30 days of G approval date approval shalt be null9nd void Lz� z THIS INSTRUMENT DRAFTED BY ED FLANUM JOB NO.02-25 DATE:4-24-02 Vol.16 Page 4325 It Parcel #: 038-1040-50-175 11/04/2004 08:35 AM PAGE 1 OF 1 Alt.Parcel#: 9.31.18.175A-20 038-TOWN OF STAR PRAIRIE Current ❑X ST. CROIX COUNTY,WISCONSIN Creation Date Historical Date Map# Sales Area Application# Permit# Permit Type #of Units 00 0 Tax Address: Owner(s): *= Current Owner CAROL A BELISLE *BELISLE, CAROL A 1131 212TH AVE BOX NEW RICHMOND WI 54017 Districts: SC=School SP=Special Property Address(es): *=Primary Type Dist# Description SC 5432 SCH D OF SOMERSET SP 1700 WITC Legal Description: Acres: 5.000 Iat: 1509-CSM 16/4325 SEC 9 T31 N R1 8W SW SE LOT 1 CSM 16/4325 Block/Condo Bldg: LOT 1 Tract(s): (Sec-Twn-Rng 401/4 1601/4) 09-31N-18W SW SE Notes: Parcel History: Date Doc# Vol/Page Type 10/13/2003 743465 2434/305 WD 12/06/2002 701130 2070/281 WD I 2004 SUMMARY Bill M Fair Market Value: Assessed with: 33,900 Valuations: Last Changed: 10/13/2004 Description Class Acres Land Improve Total State Reason RESIDENTIAL G1 5.000 47,000 0 47,000 NO Totals for 2004: General Property 5.000 47,000 0 47,000 Woodland 0.000 0 0 Totals for 2003: General Property 5.000 23,500 0 23,500 Woodland 0.000 0 0 Lottery Credit: Claim Count: 0 Certification Date: Batch#: Specials: User Special Code Category Amount Special Assessments Special Charges Delinquent Charges Total 0.00 0.00 0.00