HomeMy WebLinkAbout020-1112-50-100 Q o C) °
C) oe
ao °
� c I
c •m
0 0
N
a � i
0 0
Go �`
Q
� O I
00
04
E 00
N
v
o
c z a�22
LL c C
_° O.N
NK
p O
Q c C
iI O
z N
w E
N (n: _ O
o
Z
N FN- Z d m
o z v
c
C
V1 FZ- •- �
c E
7 N
N
N �
CL
• � N
c o
�Q z° zz
O
N
d —
Cl-
(D c
O G w —"
N d
L O O
a
*� O O O a
'N R 0
CL N
m o N o 0
}y w U r' z
V M c
O O �
p p .Z3 j
CL
Z u, cu
O O_ Qc N c
Q
N N :U o 3 a CO O o
"t p O
r/ N
tyDy N c ° C w
'' � spJ N w N •L7
O N
• �a No - m I O z N z z fn
.w
a
y
_ - a r CL
`rl Q v a E O w u
Parcel #: 020-1112-50-100 08/04/2009 10:17 AM
PAGE 1 OF 1
Alt. Parcel#: 12.29.20.458A-10 020-TOWN OF HUDSON
Current X ST. CROIX COUNTY,WISCONSIN
Creation Date Historical Date Map# Sales Area Application# Permit# Permit Type #of Units
00 0
Tax Address: Owner(s): O=Current Owner, C=Current Co-Owner
O-HART, ROY G& EVANGELINE M
ROY G & EVANGELINE M HART
1054 HWY 35
HUDSON WI 54016
Districts: SC= School SP=Special Property Address(es): '=Primary
Type Dist# Description ' 1054 HWY 35
SC 2611 HUDSON
SP 1700 WITC
Legal Description: Acres: 9.774 Plat: 4046-CSM 15-4046 020-01
SEC 12 T29N R20W PT NW SE BEING CSM Block/Condo Bldg: LOT 01
15/4046 LOT 1 9.774AC
Tract(s): (Sec-Twn-Rng 401/4 1601/4)
12-29N-20W NW SE
Notes: Parcel History:
Date Doc# Vol/Page Type
04/25/2006 823559 QC
07/23/1997 444/88
2009 SUMMARY Bill#: Fair Market Value: Assessed with:
0
Valuations: Last Changed: 10/25/2005
Description Class Acres Land Improve Total State Reason
RESIDENTIAL G1 9.774 115,600 151,900 267,500 NO
Totals for 2009:
General Property 9.774 115,600 151,900 267,500
Woodland 0.000 0 0
Totals for 2008:
General Property 9.774 115,600 151,900 267,500
Woodland 0.000 0 0
Lottery Credit: Claim Count: 1 Certification Date: Batch#: 139
Specials:
User Special Code Category Amount
Special Assessments Special Charges Delinquent Charges
Total 0.00 0.00 0.00
SUIH �. of FILED 31
((�� �e n�/ 1 �oo� ,. F
`'QW3 c ``z r'i CU MAR / 200� t
i o " 29 ST.CROIX COUNTY 8eg'SW of Deeds F
z�H 4- -• `� ; .. SURVEYOR'SRECORO SLCroixCo.•Yh /'
CU
�ZH� C...) �I O~GWO~C� C.�W V V•
C EP 's T I E D SUP V E Y MA P
Located in the Northwest quarter of the Southeast quarter of Section 12,
Township 29 North, Range 20 West, Town of Hudson,
St. Croix County, Wisconsin.
El/4 Corner
Sec. 12-Z9-20 \ No improvements or structures are allowed between the right-of-way
w \ and the setback line. Improvements include but are not limited to
Owners: o N a signs,parking lots,parallel driveways,wells, septic systems,drainage
-"' \ facilities,etc.,it being expressly intended that this restriction
Roy a & Angie o chalk constitute a restriction for the benefit of the public according
01 to section 236.293,Wisconsin Statutes and shall be
1054 Hwy 35 z \ enforceable by the Dept.of Transportation.
Hudson, W i. ontact the Wisconsin Department of
Trans-
a O a
\ti 4 �T pl
�tation District Office for more information.
The
,phone number may be obtained
y 100 F+� �h'ic by con�acting your County High-
D.O.T , $ sAF°r ,'S'� WapDepartment.
Approval number 20 e•32, c'4< F�o�,I \�.gY \
55-35-3192-2001 . 5•e�• ? b +oF FFs ,,
r
F
20 •8
tn
cu Ap
s 4s
to o./ oa,...../,y� I� •
W (U
1AJ 4;
b A A \
(r I O
Q) S
t` ti O
a SE`ra4 sEre q� .�
425763 Sqft. sT., or!''•.
WS ('-9.774 .acres) � \
o,
c � 80 p oo••..
Z ,`I• '�
V
? 2 0 In
J Z I W' OD I� GARAGE A (TVEb
W Q I W w ® ST.CROIX COUNTY omi
3 2 `I s m m I� ® Plannina Zonino and Parks Corgmittee n
tV J y to HOUSE
p !1
Z W 4 L 0 m W
Z Q. II LIAR p 12001 Ui a1 (,
W Z Z ', H I aP tre�rde w s of 3 Q
J o = Q I --rova ate ll De J I
vN Q I ®sHEO null and void s
a o ' Z I 0
ULI I 9 ' JI
X I
80.100'1 598.23 6 , J I
( 1- I N 01'08'03"W 678.23' Q QI
z , (L®7T 2 Z JI I
a 195154 Sqft. j l
N (4.480 acres) N I
Cl/4 Corner D
Sec. 12-29-20
N0I°06.51"W
Bearings referenced 1990.10'
to the North line of wESr LINE OF SE I14 ,
the SE1/4, assumed N 6'51"W 647 . 577 S1/4 Cor.. ��
N89004130"E. � Sec.. 12-29-20
STARR_ WOOD ADDITION I 7
OUTLOT _2
SCALE IN FEET l'= 150' N
This instrument drafted by: loo 200 300 4002689
Vol.15 Page 4046
MINUTES
BOARD OF ADJUSTMENTS MEETING AND HEARINGS
June 30, 1987
Meeting called to order by Chairman Meinke at 9 : 00 A.M. in the
County Board Room, Courthouse, Hudson. All members present.
Minutes of the May meeting and hearings approved as mailed. The
next regular meeting will be July 28, 1987 .
OLD BUSINESS: William H. Derrick and John Schottler . Motion by
Supr . Sweitzer to postpone both requests indefinately until
requested information is submitted. The information should be
submitted to the Zoning Office one week prior to the meeting so
the Zoning Administrator has time to review it . Motion seconded
by Supervisor Kinney. Motion carried.
Marjorie Crawford: Motion by Supervisor Kinney to conditionally
approve the application with the condition that the DNR and MN-WI
BAC have a chance to review and approve the new information.
Motion seconded by Suprvisor Sweitzer . Motion carried .
Mark Sutter : Motion by Supervisor Kinney to grant the driveway
variance for a single residence use . Motion seconded by
Supervisor Sweitzer . Motion carried.
Hearings called to order by Chairman Meinke at 9 : 30 A.M. The
Zoning Administrator, Tom Nelson, read the notice of the hearings
as published in the local newspapers .
Chairman Meinke explaned the procedures of the hearing.
1 . ARTICLE: 17 . 64 (1) (C) 2 & 17 . 31 ( 2 ) Highway Setback
and Setback from Water
APPELLANT: Donald R. Coles
LOCATION: South shore of Cedar Lake on County Road H:
S03/T31N/R18W, Town of Star Prairie
2 . ARTICLE: 17 . 65 ( 3 ) Off-premise Sign
APPELLANT: Collins-LaCrosse Sign
LOCATION: 1 . NE 1/4 of the SE 1/4 of Section 4, T28N-
R16W, Town of Eau Galle; 2 . SW 1/4 of the SE
1/4 of Section 2, T31N-R19W, Town of
Somerset; 3 . SW 1/4 of the SW 1/4 of Section
14, T30N-R18W,Town of Richmond; 4 . SW 1/4 of
the NE 1/4 of Section 5, T30N-R19W, Town of
Somerset; 5. NW 1/4 of the SE 1/4 of Section
3, T28N-R17W, Town of Rush River
3 . ARTICLE: 17 . 31 ( 2 ) Setback from Water
APPELLANT: Richard & Lois Handrahan
LOCATION: NE 1/4 of the NE 1/4 of Section 21, T31N-
R18W, Town of Star Prairie
4 . ARTICLE: 17 . 64 (1 ) (d ) 2 Highway Setback
APPELLANT: Louis & Colleen Rivard
LOCATION: E 1/2 of the SW 1/4 of Section 24, T31N-R19W,
Town of Somerset
1
5. ARTICLE: 17 . 64 (1 ) (c) 2 Highway Setback
APPELLANT: John D. Goulette
LOCATION: NW 1/4 of the NW 1/4 of Section 12, T31N-
R18W, Town of Star Prairie
6 . ARTICLE: 17 . 29 ( 2) Filling & Grading Shoreland
APPELLANT: Terry Ritter
LOCATION: Lot 2 of Government Lot 5 of Section 26,
T30N-R19W, Town of St. Joseph
7 . ARTICLE: 17 . 65 ( 3 ) Off Premise Sign
APPELLANT: Jodi K . Solum
LOCATION: 1 . SE 1/4 of the NE 1/4 of Section 5, T30N-
R18W, Town of Richmond; 2 . SW 1/4 of the SW
1/4 of Section 14, T30N-R18W, Town of
Richmond
8 . ARTICLE: 17 . 65 ( 3 ) Off Premise Sign
APPELLANT: Steven Montbriand
LOCATION: NE 1/4 of the NW 1/4 of Section 10,T30N-R19W,
Town of Someret
9 . ARTICLE: 17 . 18 ( 1) B Similarly compatible commercial
enterprise-used car lot
APPELLANT: V. Studtmann Inc.
LOCATION: Gov't Lot 4, Section 22, T30N-R20W, Town of
St . Joseph
10 . . ARTICLE: 17 . 29 ( 2 ) (b) 1-3 Filling & Grading
APPELLANT: St . Croix County Highway Department
LOCATION: Part of the NW 1/4 of the NE 1/4 of Section
29,T29N-R18W, Town of Warren
11 . ARTICLE: 17 . 36 ( 5) (c) 2 Setback from Bluff, Riverway
District
APPELLANT: Laurie L. Halberg
LOCATION: S26/T28N/R20W PT G L 3 COM 731 FT S OF NE
COR, W 549 FT, N 73 DEG W 66 FT, S 69 DEG W
122 .6 FT. , TH S 43 DEG W 443 FT, N 12 DEG W
671. 2 FT, W 570 FT TO POB, Town of Troy
12 . ARTICLE: 17 . 36 ( 5) ( 1 ) Filling & Grading, Riverway
District
APPELLANT: Roy G. Hart
LOCATION: NW 1/4 OF THE SE 1/4 OF Section 12, T29N-
R20W, Town of Hudson
The Zoning Administrator explained that the appeal for Roy G.
Hart would not be heard since it was not located in the Riverway
District as mapped by NR118 . The error in the Zoning maps will
have to be corrected by map amendments . Also, Jodi K . Solum
requested that her application be dropped until another suitable
property can be located . The state recently rejected her request
for the proposed location of the sign.
Mr. Donald R. Coles presented his request to build a garage 60 '
from the centerline of "CTH H" and an addition to the house which
would only be 45 feet from the waters edge of Cedar Lake . The
deck expansion would be 35 ' from waters edge, the same distance
as the existing deck .
Collins-LaCrosse Sign: Mr . Bruce Cowell presented his request
for signs at five locations in the county. The sign located in
2
Rush River will be advertising Leinenkugel of Chippewa Falls,
Wisconsin. The other locations will advertise the campground at
Rivers Edge, Somerset, Wisconsin. He went on to explain the
procedures the state uses for review of signs .
Mr . William Raliegh representing Rivers Edge stated that they
have put alot of time and money into their projects and,
therefore, need proper advertising.
Richard Peterson, County Board Supervisor, representing the
township of Rush River, stated they were opposed to the placement
of a sign in their township because any revenues cannot
compensate the time needed to administer the sign and that it
doesn' t advertise an entity that the township would benefit from.
He read a letter opposing the sign signed by the Town Chairman,
Wayne Loock .
Mr . Robert Dewall indicated he opposed the sign located along STH
64 in Somerset township. He is very concerned with the way it is
beginning to look like with all of the signs in the township.
Mr . Bob Pierce of Somerset township expressed his concern of too
many signs and that the ordinance should be reviewed .
Mr . Bruce Cowell explained that they will abide by any local
permits required and agrees thane are many illegal signs both in
placement and state of repair . Signs are important for the local
economy. He is opposed to illegal signs and the so called 1190
day" sign. The county needs better enforcement and should begin
an inventory of signs . He feels illegal vs . legal signs is the
issue .
Mr . William Raliegh stated that commerce is very important in the
Somerset area and does not plan on abusing the 1190" day permit.
Ms . Beth Stenzel stated there should be a control over the number
of signs permitted in a given area .
Ms . Kathy Granger stated her daughter works at a tubing industry
and they give out pamphlets of all the tubing establishments .
Mr . Bob Pierce stated that it's not a matter of stopping signs
but a matter of compromise .
Mr . Richard Handrahan presented his request for a variance to be
granted closer to the Apple River, 4511 and closer to the town
road which would be 41 ' . The structure being erected will be a
storage shed and this is the only location that would be possible
on the property.
Mr. Louis Rivard presented his request to be 2 feet closer to the
town road than the existing residence . The reason for being
closer is so the rooflines of the addition can complement the
existing residence .
Mr. John D. Goulette presented his request to allow the swimming
3
pool which had been installed illegally too close to the road to
be granted. The pool company, AquaMate, which installed the pool
was to have taken care of all the requirements .
Mr . Terry Ritter presented his request to install within 300 feet
of Bass Lake . This fill would stabilize an errosional escarpment
and would be stabilized with concrete spillways . Also, he is
requesting to place a stairway to the lake and retaining wall
within 75 feet of the lake .
Mr . Steven Montbriand presented his request to place signs on CTH
I so as to advertise his tubing facility.
The Zoning Administrator pointed out to Mr . Montbriand that the
signs he has already posted are illegal and that there are a
number of other signs also in violation of his .
Ms . Karen Gillitzer wondered why he is allowed to keep those
signs in place .
Ms . Julie Stoner speaking on behalf of Charleen Charbonneau
objected to the whole recreational facility which is a newly
created establishment. They were here before the campground and
she is concerned with the impact such as lowering property
values . Ms . Marilyn Malgren didn't come to Somerset bacause of
this recreational use but because of the rural nature . There
were no recreational establishments in their area when they
arrived and they are not opposed to free enterprise but wishes
their rights could also be appreciated .
Ms . Kathy Grangor indicated she is opposed to the proliferation
of signs in the area.
Mr . Ray Brown, St. Joseph Town chairman, wanted to know where
signs were located in Houlton.
Ms . Beth Stenzel is concerned with illegal signs and why they are
allowed to remain up. These residential roads are becoming
commercial and property values are going down because of it .
Mr. Will Studtman representing V. Studtman Inc. presented his ,
request for a used car lot with showroom and parking area . This
would be on 165 ' of his frontage .
Mr . Bob Pierce, Somerset township, is concerned with the
appearance of the cars on the lot . There are currently cars on
the lot which are illegal . Also, this is a major traffic area
and this use would interfere with the congestion. He should wait
until the new highway is planned.
Mr . Howard Laventure is concerned with everything on the
property. So far only verbals as to what he will be doing but
nothing has been shown on paper . He has already violated the
ordinance by selling cars and currently has an Auto wrecking yard
by definition of the ordinance because of the vehicles in
disrepair . He questions the accuracy of the petition and is
4
concerned with this use in a residentially influenced area. The
petition contains only names of his friends and relatives no
'adjoining owners .
Mr . Ray Brown, St. Joseph town chairman, is concerned with the
traffic in the area . A used car lot and dairy mart are not
compatible . There will be a lot of cars possibly bringing theft
to the area. This would be an area for a nice restaurant. The
township is now considering a total plan for the township. This
is not what they want to see .
Ms . Linda Luckey, St. Joseph town clerk, read the minutes of a
special town meeting recommending the special exception be
denied . A written plan is needed.
Mr . Studtman indicated the cars belonged to other people and they
had been notified to remove them.
Mr . Benjamin Jewel indicated the B & L Liquor store has been
selling used cars and nothing has been done . The residence
across from the liquor store has also been doing this . Mr . Bob
Peters feels a written plan is needed.
Mr . Laurie Halberg presented his request to remodel a barn into
an art studio and add a garage along Glenmont Road. This is in
the Riverway District and he wants to remove a portion of the
barn and also a small building which should improve the lot. Mr .
Lee Halber stated he had no comment for support or for denial .
Mr . Scott Halberg supports the project.
1 . DONALD R. COLES: Motion by Supervisor Kinney to grant the
variance of 60 foot setback from the centerline of "CTH H" for
the proposed garage and conditionally approve the variance of 45 '
to the ordinary high water mark for the cabin addition. The
condition being that the septic system be varified by a certified
soil tester as having code complying soils three feet below the
bottom of the system and no discharge into the lake . Motion
seconded by Supervisor Sweitzer . Vote to conditionally approve :
Kinney, yes; Sweitzer, yes; Meinke, yes . Motion carried.
2 . COLLINS-LACROSSE SIGN:
EAU GALLE TOWNSHIP--NE 1/4 of the SE 1/4 of Section 4, T28N-
R16W. Motion by Supervisor Kinney to approve with condition
that sign is set 10 feet back from right-a-way line . Motion
Seconded by Supervisor Sweitzer . Vote to Approve : Kinney,
yes; Sweitzer, yes; Meinke, yes . Motion carried .
SOMERSET TOWNSHIP--SW 1/4 of the SE 1/4 of Section 2, T31N-
R19W. Motion by Supervisor Kinney to approve with condition
that sign is set 10 feet back from right-a-way line . Motion
Seconded by Supervisor Sweitzer . Vote to Approve : Kinney,
yes; Sweitzer, yes; Meinke, yes . Motion carried .
RICHMOND TOWNSHIP--SW 1/4 of the SW 1/4 of Section 14, T30N-
R18W. Motion by Supervisor Kinney to consolidate signs
5
related to Rivers Edge into one sign similar to the onsite
sign on STH 64 . Motion Seconded by Supervisor Sweitzer .
Vote to consolidate : Kinney, yes; Sweitzer, yes; Meinke,
yes . Motion carried.
SOMERSET TOWNSHIP--SW 1/4 of the NE 1/4 of Section 5, T30N-
R19W. Motion by Supervisor Kinney to postpone the decision
until it can be determined how many signs currently exist
advertising the Rivers Edge use . Motion seconded by
Supervisor Sweitzer . Vote to postpone : Kinney, yes;
Sweitzer, yes; Meinke, yes . Motion carried .
RUSH RIVER TOWNSHIP--NW 1/4 of the SE 1/4 of Section 3,
T28N-R17W. Motion by Supervisor Sweitzer to approve with
the condition it is set back 10 feet from the right-of-way
line . Motion seconded by Supervisor Kinney. Vote to
conditionally approve : Kinney, yes; Sweitzer, yes; Meinke,
yes . Motion carried .
3 . RICHARD & LOIS HANDRAHAN: Motion by Supervisor Sweitzer to
conditionally approve the variance request of 41 feet to the
centerline of the town road and 45 feet to the ordinary high
water mark of the river . The condition being that they receive
written recommendations by the township and neighbors to also
vary the driveway separation distance and submit to the Zoning
Office . Motion seconded by Supervisor Kinney. Vote to
conditionally approve : Kinney, yes; Sweitzer, yes; Meinke, yes .
Motion carried .
4 . LOUIS & COLLEEN RIVARD: Motion by Supervisor Kinney to
conditionally approve the variance request of two feet closer to
the road than the existing residence with the condition being
that the septic system soils be varified by a certified soil
tester as being suitable three feet below the bottom of the
system. Motion seconded by Supervisor Sweitzer . Vote to
conditionally approve : Kinney, yes; Sweitzer, yes; Meinke, yes .
Motion carried .
5. JOHN D. GOULETTE: Motion by Supervisor Kinney to postpone '
for thirty days so that installer of pool, AquaMate, can testify
as to why the pool needs to be closer than the required setback .
Motion seconded by Supervisor Sweitzer . Vote to postpone :
Kinney, yes; Sweitzer, yes; Meinke, yes . Motion carried .
6 . TERRY RITTER: Motion by Supervisor Kinney to conditionally
approve the proposed filling and grading with the condition the
plan be evaluated by the Soil Conservation Service and amended as
necessary to their specifications . A copy of their reveiw should
be returned to the Zoning Administrator . All setback requests to
be granted since they meet the requirements of the ordinance .
Motion seconded by Supervisor Sweitzer . Vote to conditionally
approve : Kinney, yes; Sweitzer, yes; Meinke, yes . Motion
carried.
7. STEVEN MONTBRIAND: Motion by Supervisor Kinney to postpone
until a comprehensive plan showing all of his advertising
6
locations . There are currently a number of signs that have not
legally been approved as special exceptions and these need to be
reviewed as well . Motion seconded by Supervisor Sweitzer . Vote
to postpone : Kinney, yes; Sweitzer, yes; Meinke, yes . Motion
carried .
8 . V. STUDTMANN INC. : Motion by Supervisor Kinney to postpone
any decision until a comprehensive plan can be provided for this
property. This plan should include any proposed facilities for
the property, setbacks, etc. and be reviewed by the township of
St . Joseph. All unlicensed vehicles shall at this time be
removed as had been indicated by Mr . Studtmann. Motion seconded
by Supervisor Sweitzer . Vote to postpone : Kinney, yes;
Sweitzer, yes; Meinke, yes . Motion carried.
9. LAURIE L. HALBERG: Motion by Supervisor Sweitzer to approve
with the condition something is received in writing confirming
their position . The owner is to also confirm right-a-way line by
professional surveyor so as not to place garage over line . The
township and county assume no responsibility should future road
construction impose on structure . Motion seconded by Supervioor
Kinney. Vote to conditionally approve : Kinney, yes; Sweitzer,
yes; Meinke, yes . Motion carried .
Motion by Supervisor Sweitzer to adjourn. Seconded by Supervisor
Kinney. Motion carried.
Edith Sweitzer, Secretary
ES :TN:rc
7
SPECIAL EXCEPTION USE PERMIT APPLICATION FOR ST- CROIX COUN`!'Y 00,7-jy
. The undersigned hereby applies to .the S`1'. CROIX COUNTY BOARD OF
ADJUSTMENT pursuant to Chapter 9 of the ST. CROIX COUNTY ZON114C ORIUIfANCE
for a special exception use hermit and represents as follows :
APPLICANT �)n V G, 3_
ADDRESS CIS 141LO /
OWNER of SITE
ADDRESS
ARCHITECT, ENGINEER, CONTRA TOR r-'�x"
LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF SITE L(,J ZY fiF
lU �Z_0GJ �TCGuI(
ADDRESS OF SITE Y! F At V6
TYPE OF STUCTUREi
PROPOSED USE OF STRUCTURE OR SITE
ZONING- DISTRICT L t ri--e k ---
SECTION OF ZONING ORDINANCFL WHICH IDENTIFIES THIS USE AS A SPECIAL
EXCEPTION USE IN THE ZONING DISTRICT 3 �P Cs') L)
PLAT OR SURVEY OR SCALE MAP MUST ACCOMPANY TUIS APPLICATION.
The applicant must submit , as part of thin application , those items
of information identified in the following checklist as being relevant to
the ordinance standards applicable to the proposed use.1p 2 DAT _j SIGNED ly an nt
Payment of $150 .00 payable to St . Croix County Zoning Administration is "
due at time of submittal to Zoning Office of application.
SPECIAL EXCEPTION- USE PERMIT CHECK-LIST
NOTE: The following checklist identifies information to be
included with the application for a conditional use permit.
The applicant is required to submit to the zoning office
all of those items of information marked with an "X."
I . A Title sheet which includes the following information:
a. project location map . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .l—J
b. total lot area . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
C. building/dwelling unit information:
I . number of buildings per parcel . . . . . . . . . .�
2. number of dwelling units per building . . . . . .Q
3. average square feet of lot area per
dwelling unit provided. . . . . . . . . . . . . .[�
4. usable open space per dwelling unit provided. . .�
5. total usable open space provided. . . . . . . . .Q
2. A General Development Plan which includes the following
information:
a. statement describing the general character of the �
intended development . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
b. accurate (to scale) map of the project area in-
cluding its relationship to surrounding properties t-1
and existing topography and key natural features . . .U
C. number of parking spaces provided. . . . . . . . . . .�
d. underground electric and telephone service . . . . . .�
3. Complete description of existing utilities adjacent to site
a. Existing and workable proposed grades (contour lines
at two foot contour interval minimum) and surface
drainage. Supplement the contour lines with spot
elevations along drainage swales where necessary.
If the project is adjacent to an existing improved
street, elevation of the top of curb and sidewalk shall
be indicated at 50 foot stations.
If the street and/or sidewalk is not existing,
proposed elevations shall be shown . . . . . . . . . .Q
b. Complete existing and proposed storm sewer and
sanitary sewer information including pipe sizes,
invert elevation of manhole, inlets, etc. . . . . . .�
C. Property lines, building sizes, locations and
distance between both existing and proposed. . . . . Q
d. Location of all easements, existing or proposed. . . 0
e. Location, type and size of all existing trees,
utility poles, fire hydrants and other structures,
etc. , both on-site and in all street terraces
adjacent to the site. . . . . . . . . . . . . . Q
f. Parking lot information:
I . A scaled drawing plot plan of I" = 20' or
larger of all on-site surface, structure
or underground parking. . . . . . . . . . . . .
2. Location of driveway approaches--existing,
proposed and adjoining. . . . . . . . . . . . . �
3. Rate of slope or grade or approaches and
driveways. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ED
4. Indicate number, arrangement and size of
. parking stalls and drive aisles. . . . . . . . C]
g. Vehicular access to inner courts for emergency
servicing of buildings. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Q
h. Pedestrian walks connecting buildings, other
buildings, and on-site parking areas and with
public sidewalks. (Walks shall be kept separate
from drive aisles and driveways. ) . . . . . . . . . . Q
1 . Building floor plans and elevations. . . . . . . . . F-1
4. Statements regarding the impact of the proposed project on
a. schools. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . F
b. roads. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . a
C. police and fire services . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
d. groundwater supply and quality . . . . . . . . . . . [�
e. surrounding uses . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
f. local economy. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
t
r—
g. local government fiscal situation. . . . . . . . . . t_]
5. Site reclamation plan (mining, quarrying and
dri I I i ng operations) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
i
6. Shoreland Impact statements as described in
Section of the County
Shoreland Zoning Ordinance. . . . . . . . . . . . . �
7. Floodplain Impact Statement as described in
Section of the County
Floodplain Zoning Ordinance. . . . . . . . . . . . (�
8. Shore Protection Plan . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
9. Erosion/Runoff Control Plan . . . . . . . . . . . .
10. Other items as specified by the zoning office:
11 . NamvA aid addAPAAPA nA a?P . . . . LX-"
adjoining tandawnetz