The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About161-1054-10-000 Parcel #: 161-1054-10-000 02/07/2014 04:43 PM PAGE 1 OF 1 Alt. Parcel#: 24.29.20.514D 161 -VILLAGE OF NORTH HUDSON Current XX ST. CROIX COUNTY, WISCONSIN Creation Date Historical Date Map# Sales Area Application# Permit# Permit Type #of Units 00 0 Tax Address: Owner(s): O=Current Owner, C=Current Co-Owner O-MOORE, JOEL D& KAY D TR JOEL D&KAY D TR MOORE 1327 RIVERSIDE DR N HUDSON WI 54016 Property Address(es): '=Primary 1327 RIVERSIDE DR N Districts: SC=School SP=Special Type Dist# Description SC 2611 SCH DIST OF HUDSON SP 1700 WITC Notes: Legal Description: Acres: 0.000 SEC 24 T29N R20W; PT OL 74 COM SE COR LOT 4 WILLOW VIEW ADD,TH E 252.6'TH N Parcel History: 54.48'TO POB TH S 1 00'TH S 87 DEG E TO Date Doc# Vol/Page Type LAKE NLY ALG LAKE TO PT S 87 DEG E OF 10/26/2004 778092 2683/155 QC POB TH N 87 DEG W TO POB VIL NH 07/23/1997 743/477 07/23/1997 674/283 Plat: '=Primary Tract: (S-T-R 40%160%) Block/Condo Bldg: "02-068-NORTH HUDSON ASSESSORS PLAT 24-29N-20W NA 074 2013 SUMMARY Bill#: Fair Market Value: Assessed with: 229199 440,100 Valuations: Last Changed: 07/06/2007 Description Class Acres Land Improve Total State Reason RESIDENTIAL G1 0.000 264,000 218,100 482,100 NO Totals for 2013: General Property 0.000 264,000 218,100 482,100 Woodland 0.000 0 0 Totals for 2012: General Property 0.000 264,000 218,100 482,100 Woodland 0.000 0 0 Lottery Credit: Claim Count: 1 Certification Date: Batch#: 519 Specials: User Special Code Category Amount Special Assessments Special Charges Delinquent Charges Total 0.00 0.00 0.00 BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT DECISION Request of Joel D. Moore for a special ) exception use, Article 3.4 2(c) , Rip- ) A-36-85 rap, ST. CROIX COUNTY ZONING ORDINANCE. ) August 27, 1985 Location: Riverside Dr. N. Hudson, ) Wisconsin. ) The St. Croix County Board of Adjustment conducted a public hearing on August 27, 1985 to consider the request of Joel D. Moore for a special exception use, Article 3.4 2(c) , Rip-rap, ST. CROIX COUNTY ZONING ORDINANCE. The St. Croix County Board of Adjustment conducted an on-site inspection of the site in question. After inspection, the St. Croix County Board of Adjustment entered an Executive Session to discuss the request. After returning to open session, the following decision was rendered: Motion by Supervisor Kelly to grant approval as it will correct shoreline erosion problem. Mr. Moore is to follow all D.N.R. regulations. Seconded by Supervisor Meinke. Motion carried. Vote to approve: Meinke, yes; Kelly, yes; Stephens, yes. All variances approved must be acted on or constructed within t one (1) year from date of approval or they shall be null and void. U Vernon a y, ecretary St. Croix County Board of Adjustment VK:HB:vf Sud u//NG QlpnA-p pi" Ll I Q�+�►c IC99 Od • I C� � b��RwavreG'1� &'12��R�wiVR4��G... ' I 3 r: � Ake BANK Ton v►Ew J-cilrar- C niu4P«) ----- �� 1-00.14110N o f pfiopElt v y ..._ AIO 140 b5i BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT MEETING AND HEARINGS August 27, 1985 9:00 a.m. - 3:30 p.m. Meeting called to order by Chairman Stephens at 9:00 a.m. in the County Board Room, Courthouse, Hudson. All members present. Minutes of the July 30, 1985 meeting and hearing approved. Hearing called to order by Chairman Stephens at 9:30 a.m. Zoning Adminis- trator read notice of hearings as published in the county and local news- papers. 1. ARTICLE: 8.4 B(4)(b), 3.7 B and 4.5 6. Setback from County Road, Setback from water and Filling and Grading. APPELLANT: Robert Margotto LOCATION: NE% of the NWT of Section 36, T29N-R17W, Town of Hammond ,< 2. ARTICLE: 8.4 B(4)(b) . Setback from County Road. APPELLANT: Harold Buckentin LOCATION: SE% of the NW% of Section 26, T30N-R20W, Town of St. Joseph 3. ARTICLE: 3.4 B(2) . Filling and Grading. APPELLANT: Richard and Gloria Chulyak LOCATION: NW% of the SEk of Section 20, T30N-R19W, Town of St. Joseph 4. ARTICLE: 8.4 F(1)(c) . Driveway Separation. APPELLANT: Wesley and Karen Swanson LOCATION: NWk of the NWk of Section 24, T28N-R16W, Town of Eau Galle 5. ARTICLE: 2.6 13. Tubing Operation. APPELLANT: Steven Montbriand LOCATION: SWk of the SA of Section 2, T30N-R19W, Town of Somerset - 6. ARTICLE: 3.4 2(c) . Rip rap. APPELLANT: Joel D. Moore LOCATION: Riverside Dr. N. Hudson, Wisconsin 7. ARTICLE: 3.4 B(1) . Filling and Grading. APPELLANT: Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources LOCATION: SWk of the NE-k of Section 22, T30N-R18W, Town of Richmond 8. ARTICLE: 3.4 B(1) . Filling and Grading. APPELLANT: Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources LOCATION: Ek of Section 1, T29N-R17W, Town of Hammond A of Section 6, T29N-R16W, Town of Baldwin SE34 of Section 36, T30N-R17W, Town of Erin Prairie A special hearing will be held on September 11, 1985 at 6:30 p.m. to rehear the County Highway Department request for a Gravel pit in the Township of Stanton. Chairman Stephens read correspondence on the W.J.J.O. tower. Mr. Robert Margotto presented his request to construct a storage building that would be 75 feet from the centerline of CTH "J", Setback from Baldwin Creek, and two feet above flood stage. Questions by Board members. Correspondence from D.N.R. Mr. Harold Buckentin presented his request to construct a garage that would be 47 feet from CTH "E". Correspondence from County Highway De- partment. - 2 - Richard Chulyak and Gloria Chulyak presented their request to construct a road to their property in order to build a house on their property. Mr. Chulyak informed the Board that he plans on blacktopping the road after it settles. Wesley and Karen Swanson presented their request to construct a driveway that would be 130 feet north of an adjoining driveway which is a barn entrance, explaining that driveway in another location could cause a traffic hazard. Steven Montbriand presented his request to have a tubing operation on his property. The operation and tubing use would be on a charitable basis. Proceeds from donations. Th6re were nine people in attendance objecting to the tubing request. Zoning Administrator read four letters from persons objecting to the tubing. Mr. Montbriand rebutted the remarks. Questions by Board members. Mr. Joel Moore presented his request to rip rap the shoreline on his property in order to prevent further erosion of his property and adding pollution to Lake Mallalieu. Mr. Orville Lokker presented the request of the Sportsman Alliance of Sportsman Club and D.N.R. to fill a sink hole in Pine Lake. Pine Lake has lost about 10 to 12 feet of water due to the sink hole. Two persons sent letters in favor of the project. Mr. Scott Stewart, D.N.R. , explained sink holes and how they plan to fill them along with the water levels of the lake. Mr. Michael Hamerski, adjoining land owner, spoke in favor of the project. Alan Jacobson and Dale Fern, land owners, are also in favor. Cindy Swanberg, D.N.R., presented their request to construct three small shallow ponds for waterfowl production and drinking water for cattle on an. experimental basis. Ms. Swanberg explained the reasons for the pot holes. Jerry Williams, adjoining land owner, is in favor of the project. Richard Hopkins, Richmond Town Board, attended the meeting for information. The Town Board is neither for or against the project. Questions by members of the Board. Motion by Supervisor Kelly to recess the hearing to view the sites in question. Board went into closed session to discuss the Board of Adjustments request. Board returned to open session to render decisions. 1. Robert Margotto: Motion by Supervisor Stephens to grant the request of Mr. Margotto, on condition that he follow all D.N.R. regulations for flood proofing two feet above normal high water and he shall build 75 feet from CTH ' J". Seconded by Supervisor Kelly. Motion carried. Vote to approve: Kelly, yes; Meinke, yes; Stephens, yes. 2. Harold Buckentin: Motion by Supervisor Meinke to 'rant permission to construct a garage 75 feet from the centerline of CTH "Eand that the present driveway be used as an access. Seconded by Supervisor Kelly. Motion carried. Vote to approve: Meinke, yes; Kelly, yes; Stephens, yes. 3. Richard Chulyak: Motion by Supervisor Stephens to grant approval on condition that he meet all D.N.R. requirements and he prevent any siltation to the pond on his property and any erosion controls as needed. Seconded by Supervisor Kelly. Motion carried. Vote to approve: Meinke, yes; Stephens, yes; Kelly, yes. 4. Wesley Swanson: Motion by Supervisor Meinke to grant the request to construct a driveway 130 feet from the barn drive to the south as this is the safest location for a driveway. Seconded by Supervisor Kelly.,, Motion carried. Vote to approve: Meinke, yes; Kelly, yes; Stephens, yes. - 3 - r 5. Joel D. Moore: Motion by Supervisor Kelly to grant approval as it will correct shoreline erosion problem. Mr. Moore is to follow all D:N.R, regulations. Seconded by Supervisor Meinke. Motion carried. Vote to approve: Meinke, yes; Kelly, yes; Stephens, yes. 6.A. D.N.R. Pine Lake project: Motion by Su'ervisor Kelly to approve the request to fill a sink hole in Pine Lake as it is in the best interest to all residents in the area to have the lake brought up to its natural level. Seconded by Supervisor Meinke. Motion carried. Vote to approve: Meinke, yes; Stephens, yes; Kelly, yes. 6.B. D.N.R. Lundy Pond project: Motion by S pervisor Stephens to deny the request as it is not in the best interest of the general public. Seconded by Supervisor Kelly. Motion carried. Vote to deny: Stephens, yes; Kelly, yes; Meinke, yes. 7. Steven Montbriand: Chairman Stephens requested that Supervisor Meinke abstain from voting as he is the Town Board Chairman. Motion by Supervisor Stephens to grant the Steven Montbriand request as the business he proposes will have limited impact on the neighb rhood. Seconded by Supervisor Kelly. Motion carried. Vote to appro . Stephens, yes; Kelly, yes; Meinke, abstained. Motion by Supervisor Kelly to adjourn. Seconded by Supervisor Meinke. Motion carried. The next regular scheduled meeting and hearing is September 24, 1985. A special hearing is scheduled for September 11, 1985 at 6:30 p.m. �Llv Vernon Kelly, Sedtetary VK:HB:vf SPECIAL EXCEPTION USE PERMIT APPLICATION FOR ST- CROIX CO The undersigned hereby applies to .the ST CROIX CO II 0 ADJUSTMENT pursuant to Chapter 9 of the ST. CROIX COUid'1'Y 1[JG 14, for a special exception use derniit and repres nts as Lol � s ;Q APPLICANT ADDRESS ZlOZ 41V& 'I /V' OWNER of SITE2_ ADDRESS Scvwuz ARCHITECT, ENGINEER, CONTRAj TOR � LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF SITE Q a06e� `ro I( ADDRESS OF SITE 2� lL�PJ)'SlGQ2 �SY, �B'yf � S�OL,C TYPE OF STUCTURE 1� �w Igo re tint e PROPOSED USE OF STRUCTURE OR SITE ZONING- DISTRICT SECTION OF ZONING ORDINANCE WHICH IDENTIFIES THIS USE AS A SPECIAL EXCEPTION USE. IN THE ZONING DISTRICT PLAT OR SURVEY OR SCALE MAP MUST ACCOMPANY THIS APPLICATION. The applicant must sutmit , as part of this application , those items of information identified in the following checklist as being relevant to the ordinance standards applicable to the propose use. DATE SIGNED App icant Agent Payment of $150,00` payable to St . Croix County Zoning Administration is due at. time of submittal to Zoning Office of application. 1' i SPECIAL EXCEPTION- USE PERMIT CHECK-LIST NOTE: The following checklist identifies information to be included with the application for a conditional use permit. The applicant is required to submit to the zoning office all of those items of information marked with an "X." I . A Title sheet which includes the following information: a. project location map . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .Q b. total lot area . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .Q C. building/dwelling unit information: I . number of buildings per parcel . . . . . . . . . .� 2. number of dwelling units per building . . . . . .Q 3. average square feet of lot area per dwelling unit provided. . . . . . . . . . . . . .[� 4. usable open space per dwelling unit provided. . .d 5. total usable open space provided. . . . . . . . .0 2. A General Development Plan which includes the following information: a. statement describing the general character of the intended development . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .[� b. accurate (to scale) map of the project area in- cluding its relationship to surrounding properties t----1 and existing topography and key natural features . . .u C. number of parking spaces provided. . . . . . . . . . C] d. underground electric and telephone service . . . . . .Q 3. Complete description of existing utilities adjacent to site a. Existing and workable proposed grades (contour lines at two foot contour interval minimum) and surface drainage. Supplement the contour lines with spot elevations along drainage swales where necessary. If the project is adjacent to an existing improved street, elevation of the top of curb and sidewalk shall be indicated at 50 foot stations. If the street and/or sidewalk is not existing, � proposed elevations shall be shown . • b. Complete existing and proposed storm sewer and sanitary sewer information including pipe sizes, � invert elevation of. manhole, inlets, etc. . . . . . • C. Property lines, building sizes, locations and distance between both existing and proposed. . . . . 0 d. Location of all easements, existing or proposed. . � e. Location, type and size of all existing trees, utility poles, fire hydrants and other structures, etc. , both on-site and in all street terraces adjacent to the site. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . [� f. Parking lot information: I . A scaled drawing plot plan of I" = 20' or larger of all on-site surface, structure � or underground parking. . . . . . . . . . . . • 2. Location of driveway approaches--existing, proposed and adjoining. . . . . . . . . . . . . E 3. Rate of slope or grade or approaches and driveways. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . U 4. Indicate number, arrangement and size of � r✓' parking stalls and drive aisles. . . . . . g. Vehicular access to inner courts for emergency servicing of buildings. . . . . . . . . . . . . . �] h. Pedestrian walks connecting buildings, other buildings, and on-site parking areas and with public sidewalks. (Walks shall be kept separate from drive aisles and driveways. ) . . . . . . . . . . [� i . Building floor plans and elevations. . . . . . . . . � 4. Statements regarding the impact of the proposed project on a. schools. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . [� b. roads. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . C. police and fire services . . . . . . . . . . . . . d. groundwater supply and quality . . . . . . . . . . . e. surrounding uses . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . f. local economy. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Q g. local government fiscal situation. . . � 5. Site reclamation plan (mining, quarrying and dri I I ing operations) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6. Shoreland Impact statements as described in Section of the County � Shoreland Zoning Ordinance. . . . . . . . . . . . . 7. Floodplain Impact Statement as described in Section of the County Floodplain Zoning Ordinance. 8. Shore Protection Plan . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9. Erosion/Runoff Control Plan . . . . . . . . . . . . 10. Other items as specified by the zoning office: 11 . Name-A and adrlftcAALgA nA nPP . . . . adjoining tandownenb . Ja,m,�s Zcell-ter -O'tUY1P/✓ jIVPI�'tLD w'