HomeMy WebLinkAbout022-1053-20-110(3) r
AIL BOARD OF ADJUSTMENTS MEETING AND HEARING
May 23 , 1991
G his meeting was recorded by a court reporter)
�
The meeting was called to order by Chairman Kinney at 8:00 A.M.
Chairman Kinney explained that individuals wishing to testify
sign their names on the register in the front of the room.
Supervisors Stephens, Menter, Kinney, Sinclear, and Bradley were
all in attendance.
Staff included Zoning Administrator Tom Nelson and Corporation
Counsel, Greg Timmerman.
Bradley made a motion to adopt the agenda, seconded by Sinclear.
Motion carried.
OLD BUSINESS
ED AFFOLTER
Nelson explained that there were still concerns on the property
and that Ed had not coordinated a meeting to go over the issues
as had been requested. Discussion on survey of lot line. It is
felt this line should be properly located.
Nelson was directed to organize the onsite meeting.
Motion by Sinclear, seconded by Bradley to postpone a discussion
on the request until the next regular meeting.
ALLEN HANSON
Nelson stated that he has of this time not received updated plans
addressing the non-metallic mining ordinance . Bob Anderson
stated they would be developed in the near future.
Motion by Sinclear, seconded by Bradley to postpone the decision.
NEW BUSINESS
Hearing was called to order at 8:30 A.M. Nelson read the notice
as published.
The St. Croix County Board of Adjustment has scheduled a public
hearing for Thursday, May 23, 1991 at 8:30 A.M. in the County
Board Room of the St. Croix County Courthouse, Hudson, Wisconsin
to consider the following appeals to the St. Croix County Zoning
Ordinance. An on site investigation will be made of each site in
question, after which the board contemplates adjournment into
closed session for the purpose of deliberating on the appeals,
pursuant to Sec. 19 . 85( 1) (a) , Wisconsin Statutes , and will
reconvene into open session for the purpose of voting on the
appeals.
1
1 . ARTICLE: 17.29(2) (a) Fillin g and grading
APPELLANT: Trout Unlimited/Ivan Schloff
LOCATION: SE 1/4 of the NE 1/4 of Sec. 18, T29N-R19W,
Town of Hudson
2. ARTICLE: 17.29(2) (a) Filling and grading
APPELLANT: St. Croix Alliance/Greg Warner
LOCATION: NE 1/4 of the NE 1/4 of Sec. 17, T31N-R18W,
Town of Star Prairie
3 . ARTICLE: 17.64(1) (c)2 Setback - County Rd.
APPELLANT: Rick & Cheryl Fenstermaker
LOCATION: NE 1/4 of the NW 1/4 of Sec. 7, T29N-R17W,
Town of Hammond
4. ARTICLE: 17.31(2) Setback - Original high water mark
APPELLANT: John & Linda Godfrey
LOCATION: SW 1/4 of the SE 1/4 of Sec. 30, T31N-R18W,
Town of Star Prairie
5. ARTICLE: 17. 31(c)1 Setback - bluffline
17. 36(5) (b) Net project area
17.64(1) (e)2 Road setback
APPELLANT: Wm. J. and Patricia Marzolf
LOCATION: Gov't. Lots 1 and 2, Sec. 13 , T28N-R20W,
Town of Troy
6. ARTICLE: 17.31(2) Setback - Ordinary high water mark
APPELLANT: Charles & Blanch Bjorklund
LOCATION: NW 1/4 of the NW 1/4 of Sec. 31, T31N-R18W,
Town of Star Prairie
7. ARTICLE: 17.64(1) (D)2 Setback from a class D road
APPELLANT: Steven & Linda Wirth
LOCATION: SE 1/4 of the SW 1/4 of Sec. 22, T31N-R16W,
Town of Cylon
8. ARTICLE: 17.36(5) (c)l Setback - Bluffline
APPELLANT: Alex S. Kosa
LOCATION: NW 1/4 of the NE 1/4 of Sec. 24, T28N-R20W,
Town of Troy
9. ARTICLE: 17.64(3) Driveway separation :3p_11
17.64(3) (c)l Widening of driveway
APPELLANT: John Bettendorf
LOCATION: NW 1/4 of the NE 1/4 of Sec. 19, T28N-R18W,
Town of Kinnickinnic
TROUT UNLIMITED/IVAN SCHLOFF
Ivan presented a request for a special exception to repair an
existing project. The repair on the riverbed would include
planking and rip raping to replace what had been dislodged.
The purpose is to maintain the depth of the pool and its width.
2
DNR supports the project.
ST. CROIX ALLIANCE/GREG WARNER
Greg presented a request to grade and remove materials on the bed
of Squaw Lake to improve the public boat landing. Because of the
fluctuating water levels, access is very difficult when the water
is down.
DNR has no problem with the request.
RICK FENSTERMnKER
Nelson stated that this was a violation of the ordinance and a
violation had been issued for a garage that had been built closer
to the road than the required 100 feet for the right-of-way line.
Rick stated that his ex-contractor was responsible for not
obtaining the permits and building it too close to the road. The
contractor was Croixland builders.
JOHN & LINDA GODFREY
Nelson stated that he had received a request for the withdrawal
of this appeal.
WM. J. & PATRICIA MARZOLF
Bill presented a request to build a 421x28' residence on a parcel
that existed before the effective date of the ordinance. The
building would be 40' from the bluffline, 25' from the side yards
and immediately next to the road easement that provides access to
two other lots.
Nelson stated he had met on the site with the applicants
providing technical information. one of the great difficulties
is the property accesses are very limited due to the excessive
slopes. No grading or filling can be done on slopes that exceed
12%.
Bob Marzolf, the applicants brother, expressed concerns as to how
it might adversely affect his property for future development of
a residence.
The township of Troy expressed concerns for emergency vehicle
access to these properties because the road is very restrictive.
CHARLES & BLANCH BJORKLUND
Charles presented a request to rebuild on his property closer to
the Apple River than the 75' setback requirement of the
ordinance. Currently no hardships are shown to exist.
Dan Koich, DNR, expressed concerns that the county ordinance had
not been amended to allow setback averaging which would allow
this request.
Ed Halkowski, neighbor to the south, stated he did not feel the
variance should be granted violating the ordinance.
3
STEVE WIRTH
Steve requested a variance for a setback off of a town road for a
pole shed.
Due to drainage problems on the property, this is the only
location that can accommodate the building.
The township does support this proposal.
ALEX KOSA
Alex Kosa requested a variance so that he could build closer to
the bluffline with a deck and a three- season porch. In addition
he would like to add an additional level to the residence
exceeding the 25' height allowed by ordinance.
Nelson stated that this request should be denied because it was
for convenience and not a hardship. There were other
alternatives that would accomplish his needs.
Dan Koich, DNR, stated that he also could not support this
request for the same reasons.
JOHN BETTENDORF
John requested that his driveway be widended from 44' to 118' to
better accommodate his commercial trucking terminal.
Nelson stated that the driveway was already in violation being
441 . The ordinance allows 35' on this type of use. Discussion
on driveway separation and instillation of driveway without
permits.
Respectfully submitted:
Robert Stephens
TCN:cj
4
�.A
BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT MEETING AND HEARING
October 28, 1991 c
This meeting was recorded by a court reporter "'
The meeting was called to order by chairman Kinney at 8 : 30 A.M.
Kinney explained the procedures of the hearing,
individuals wishing to testify sign their names andgaddresses hon
the sheet in the front of the room.
Supervisors Bradley, Menter, Sinclear, Stephens and Kinney were
all in attendance. Staff present was Zoning Administrator Tom
Nelson.
Bradley made a motion that the minutes be approved. Motion
seconded by Stephens. Motion carried.
Stephens made a motion that the agenda be approved as mailed.
Seconded by Bradley. Motion carried.
The next regular meeting will be Nov. 26, 1991.
OLD BUSINESS
FRANK BACHMAN
Steve Dunlap requested a postponement until the next regular
meeting. He has not been able to obtain the assessment values of
the structure as it existed in 1976 or the proposed values of the
structure as it will be remodeled. Motion by Stephens, seconded
by Menter to postpone a decision until the proper information can
be presented.
JOHN BETTENDORF
Attorney Mark Gherity representing Bettendorf requested that the
Board of Adjustment reconsider their denial of the variance
request to exceed the driveway width of 35 feet. Their request
is for 124 feet to accommodate the truck traffic. Gherity cited
several examples of other commercial driveway that exceeded this
setback.
-\�dOHN JOHNSTON
John DeBoer stated that the commercial storage building would be
to store inventory items for Doboy from New Richmond. There
would be very limited traffic.
Larry Isdahl stated the building would be 129,000 feet square and
requires state plan approval. There will be no loading docks.
Stephens made a motion to approve the storage use with the
condition that State approved plans be received. Motion seconded
by Bradley. Motion carried.
1
MARK MONTRBIRAND
Nelson stated that Montbriands Board of Adjustment approval for
an addition to his lake cabin has also required the installation
of a holding tank. The one year period had lapsed and a
violap'ion was issued. Montbriand is requesting a extension of
this period. Nelson stated that he was opposed to this request
since he had a year to complete this project.
Stephens made a motion to extend his installation date to May 1
of 1992 . Motion seconded by Menter. Motion carried.
LLOYD OLSON
Nelson stated this was a request for a storage building to store
boats , campers and etc. for individuals in the community.
Bradley made a motion that the use be permitted as requested.
Motion seconded by Stephens. Motion carried.
NEW BUSINESS
The hearing was called to order at 10:00 A.M. Nelson read the
notice of the hearing as published:
The St. Croix County Board of Adjustment has scheduled a public
hearing for Monday Oct. 28 , 1991 at 9:00 A.M. in the County Board
Room of the St. Croix County Courthouse, Hudson, Wisconsin to
consider the following appeals to the St. Croix County Zoning
Ordinance. An on site investigation will be made of each site in
questions, after which the board contemplates adjournment into
closed session for the purpose of deliberating on the appeals,
pursuant to Sec . 19 . 85 ( 1 ) (a) , Wisconsin Statutes , and will
reconvene into open session for the purpose of voting on the
appeals.
1. ARTICLE: 17.155(6) Gift Shop
APPELLANT: Mark & Cynthia Duenow
LOCATION: SW 1/4 of the SW 1/4 of Sec. 14 and the NW 1/4
of the NW 1/4 of Sec. 23 , T28N-R19W,
Town of Troy
2. ARTICLE: 17 .18(1) (m) Cabinet Shop
APPELLANT: Dan VanBeek
LOCATION: SE 1/4 of the SE 1/4 of Sec. 24, T28N-R17W,
Town of Rush River
3 . ARTICLE: 17.18(1) (r) Auto Mechanic Business
APPELLANT: James Raboin
LOCATION: S 1/2 of the SW 1/4 of Sec. 13 , T31N-R18W,
Town of Star Prairie
4 . ARTICLE: 17.64(1) (c)2 Setback/County Rd.
APPELLANT: Vernon E. Klaustermeier
LOCATION: NE 1/4 of the SE 1/4 of Sec. 28, T30N-R16W,
Town of Emerald
5. ARTICLE: 17.64(1) (d)2 Setback/Town Rd.
2
1
APPELLANT: Randy Beach
LOCATION: NW 1/4 of the NE 1/4 of Sec. 29, T31N-17W,
Town of Stanton
6. ARTICLE: 17 . 64(1) (d) 2 Setback/Town Road
APPELLANT: Leonard Triebold
LOCATION: SW 1/4 of the SE 1/4 of Sec. 29, T29N=R18W,
Town of Warren
Nelson stated that Duenow, VanBeek and Triebold would not be
presented for various reasons.
JAMES RABOIN
Raboin requested an Auto Mechanic Business on this property that
was recently rezoned to commercial. There are no other employees
other than himself. No hazardous materials will be stored on the
property. The township of Star Prairie supports this proposal.
VERNON E. KLAUSTERMEIER
Klaustermeier presented a request to build a storage shed 55 feet
setback from the county road in Emerald. The existing building
are currently closer than this setback. The township of Emerald
supports this proposal.
RANDY BEACH
Beach presented an amended request of 70 feet setback from the
center of a town road. The township of Stanton has opposed the
original request of 60 feet since the other existing structures
were setback further. The proposed structure is a 24 feet by 40
feet garage.
After visiting the properties the following decision were made:
JOHN BETTENDORF " `
Stephens stated that the driveway at this time is noncompliance
of the ordinance and original decision. Proper procedure for an
appeal has not been followed and the driveway should be brought
into compliance or cited with an violation.
Respectfully submitted:
�e
Robert Stephens, Secret/vet
TCN:cj
Decisions enclosed
3
Parcel #: 022-1053-20-110 02/12/20P AGE E I OF AM 1
P 1
Alt. Parcel M 19.28.18.290A10 022-TOWN OF KINNICKINNIC
Current X ST. CROIX COUNTY, WISCONSIN
Creation Date Historical Date Map# Sales Area Application# Permit# Permit Type #of Units
00 0
Tax Address: Owner(s): O=Current Owner, C=Current Co-Owner
O-BETTENDORF, JOHN
JOHN BETTENDORF
970 COULEE TR
ROBERTS WI 54023
Property Address(es): '=Primary
*285 CTY RD SS
Districts: SC=School SP=Special
Type Dist# Description
SC 4893 SCH DIST RIVER FALLS
SP 0100 CHIP VALLEY VOTECH Notes:
Legal Description: Acres: 4.820
SEC 19 T28N R18W PT NW NE LOT 1 CSM
8/2307 Parcel History:
Date Doc# Vol/Page Type
Plat: '=Primary Tract: (S-T-R 40%1601/4) Block/Condo Bldg:
*2307-CSM 08-2307 022-90 19-28N-18W NW NE LOT 01
2013 SUMMARY Bill M Fair Market Value: Assessed with:
261610 206,100
Valuations: Last Changed: 05/22/2012
Description Class Acres Land Improve Total State Reason
RESIDENTIAL G1 4.820 80,000 148,000 228,000 NO
Totals for 2013:
General Property 4.820 80,000 148,000 228,000
Woodland 0.000 0 0
Totals for 2012:
General Property 4.820 80,000 148,000 228,0000
Woodland 0.000 0
Lottery Credit: Claim Count: 1 Certification Date: Batch#: 553
Specials:
User Special Code Category Amount
Special Assessments Special Charges Delinquent Charges
Total 0.00 0.00 0.00
03 069� ! 03 0i
y
O O
•C c o j O•C U
€-
c � a� c�U w 2
wow ,m : 0
0 w m c N w Y N
3 0 o y 3 0 E � o aa r`
ti c W O O M OLZ E a� 3 awi
t% L o'�� m�a°s o uw w m ca
N .N N w m Ol¢
00� y C CO
y c d O O N C
a 4 O .@ ao Q C C ° N V m° N O
y �cc> °w °.c� o o ° EU °O` T
-p °-'nay o m _' o E-° 3rNi a�
N m y c ° w v m w O m r o E w
O N U O 2 M 0 C
O Y C'O C N w O a0 O.OY NU C
m e Z .cm.'o d) o E o v3it m z m•N N= N N j
C C
w LL C y w C.'.�k O'2 7 LL C N N N N.V?
° "$ O y`' 0.0 O O G V m ?� .O O N O p N N .- C O
v � y a� �
co.0 y ° � c= ui )I
E ¢ O L O t N 3 0 ¢ w w 7 0 w N L v
U
m M M
O)
> w•C
> Z
O
02 z w >
E
; y O O m LN
Z
E c
z �`o E
y d ° an d
a m ,; w a m ° m
z o °>
E v c
o a> d•-
dLT o' �
oZ c f6 ° w Et
oY y N ` rn
d Z rn c :°. (D m c in c w c
N H C � 7 m N 7 N � «. N
L w O a N E O
N 0 N C C O a W
7 m c c E v o ° ���
am w o. M c L m
a C
CL
(D O u°i w a� w O �N m
0 o 0 ¢ a ¢
zcnz a �? z
N _ _
l' o a
M
N In (Q E U In M E
IM
CL
m
° a O C a a 3 �' w m
� 'ooa
hw ¢ o LLV� u� t� o LLmtnv> j o FL
• 000 X000 w o
m
U) c. aa
a <n cn
v v o 0
�y Cl) � V i'', o o a) rn rn Z
N
n � .O M N QN) M O
SR
O O
CO E N Nr E
N N
M
LO w N in
O N ¢ A Q N ¢ (n O
0 0 O C N C a N C
O r
¢ F 0 v ' C > N V M N N N CN V O' W O O ° U O O 17 , N O w w O O O O C m "O N c ! t w •C •C w E E D O O Lo � O O= N O OD \ — L �
a 00 C
N O
c w v a� ° w� E E m
• o r' Y m � 0 z a a cn m o z cn
Vr7 = E = E
v� m` M € a € a
m m
r A ciao I00 ) u OmU
a
m
ti a' j O
a aUi14c'�
,_._ ca
N
o v
7
N C L U
— � CO
co
co g
w d m CO j
C
�
O 2 R
r.- 2-00 OR!9
v N acv o as
0 o � 3� u�i
E o� o
R w 0 H O C
LL o c—U'°
3 Noaa >
v
R � I
� � I
°z° a m
rn CN Z
' U
i'
O Z � C
V p N N
y R
C
N O_ .-.
C
co N 'lp
N E 0 0
d d
• N 0 -
a`
CD
R R N
� � I
C C
I y � C
Q Z H Z o Z p
Nz '
I
cr) N
cc
O N _ N
a a .+ m
D a v
Z N _7 07
LL o"16 m an. a
7 o N U) O `°
N U rn rn Z
�v T N N N O
N _m
o n
U m N a o
c 'd N O
N o
v d Q Z
cA R
O 7 a�
r„+ N N O H C O
C p ~ ' C O O N O O
CD N C
00 N p p ON w Lo � 0 E C
-rC O N
co Z . N co
N p
• N 0N ~ E
N O N pp O 7 N C L
E O R U
0 o Y CO N 0 Z N F-
m
a
m
a
m
r� c c :: rs
Parcel #: 022-1053-40-200 02/12/2014 11:40 AM
PAGE 1 OF 1
Alt. Parcel#: 19.28.18.291A-10 022-TOWN OF KINNICKINNIC
Current ❑ ST. CROIX COUNTY,WISCONSIN
Creation Date Historical Date Map# Sales Area Application# Permit# Permit Type #of Units
00 0
Tax Address: Owner(s): O=Current Owner, C=Current Co-Owner
JOHN D&CANDACE R(TR) BETTENDORF O-BETTENDORF, JOHN D&CANDACE R (TR)
970 COULEE TR
ROBERTS WI 54023
Property Address(es): '=Primary
Districts: SC=School SP=Special
Type Dist# Description
SC 4893 SCH DIST RIVER FALLS
SP 0100 CHIP VALLEY VOTECH Notes:
Legal Description: Acres: 2.617
SEC 19 T28N R18W SW NE BEING LOT 1 CSM
15/4200 Parcel History:
Date Doc# Vol/Page Type
09/27/2013 986658 TOD
Plat: "=Primary Tract: (S-T-R 40%.160/) Block/Condo Bldg:
"4200-CSM 15-4200 022-2001 19-28N-18W LOT 1
2013 SUMMARY Bill M Fair Market Value: Assessed with:
261613 Use Value Assessment
Valuations: Last Changed: 09/07/2010
Description Class Acres Land Improve Total State Reason
AGRICULTURAL G4 2.617 400 0 400 NO
Totals for 2013:
General Property 2.617 400 0 400
Woodland 0.000 0 0
Totals for 2012:
General Property 2.617 400 0 400
Woodland 0.000 0 0
Lottery Credit: Claim Count: 0 Certification Date: Batch#:
Specials:
User Special Code Category Amount
Special Assessments Special Charges Delinquent Charges
Total 0.00 0.00 0.00