The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About038-1202-20-000 i consin Department of Commerce SOIL IZ� t RT Page VWs _ of Division of Safety and Buildings ' In accordance with C w ,gdt+Al�` e C �, Attach complete ite an on paper not less than 8112 x 11 f in size.Pl�Falnn m��v�st ' plate plan P pe Include,but not limited to:vertical and horizontal reference inL M),direction Q� P I.D. w percent slope,scale or dimensions,north arrow,and loco• l�dlstavo*n rdst road. 3�-��1�Z Pease print atl information S` �v � by _ Date c�- FF,c� o�6 personal Infomtatlon you provide od for secondary purposes rya Law,ty �y(4Q��)l. Property Own Properly Locati6� CC. -. 0o .lL�' 11 114/ 1/4 7 / N R E Properly s Mailing Addre Lot Block# Subd.Name or CSM# t..�J d r City pstatj zip Code Phone Number ❑City ❑Village XTown Nearest Road 5 V61 1 Construction Use�Residential/Number of bedrooms Code derived design flow rate GPD ❑Replacement ❑ Publi comm Describe: — p�M material mil ' Flood Plain elevation if applicable /V/Jf tt General comments and recommendatlons;5,Y.5 4-e (yi F S e( ❑ Boring# ❑ Boring pit Ground surface elev._ �� ft. Depth to limiting factor Z In. $oil lcatbn Rate Horizon Depth Dominant Color Redox Description Texture Structure Consistence Boundary Roots GPO in. Munseli flu.Sz. Cont Color Gr.Sz.Sh. 'Eff#1 'Eff#2 r 6-(- 1v . r , ! / ® Boft ❑ Boring Z%pit# Ground surface elev. 13,I ft. Depth to limiting factor 6o in. icatim R Horizon Depth Dominant Color Redox Description Texture Structure Consistence Boundary Roots GPD/fF In. Munsell Qu.Sz. Cont.Color Gr.Sz.Sh. 'Eff#1 `Eff#2 f U /o a 1, �o- 10L,r 6/ l L Y 1 " Effluent#1 =BOD >30 220 mg1L and TSS>30;< 'Effluent 02=B005.5 30 mg/L and TSS 5 30 mg& Number CST Name pease Print) .? CLLL�✓ / / 10?) Address Date Evaluation Conducted Telephone Number -7 ( Property Owner Parcel ID# _ Page --of F37 Boring# r-1 Boring �} Pit Ground surface elev._ / -11-ZS ft. Depth to limiting factor J�Z in. Soil Application Rate Horizon Depth Dominant Color Redox Description Texture Structure Consistence Boundary Roots GPDM In. Munsell Qu.Sz, Cont.Color Gr.Sz.Sh. 'Eff#1 •Eff#2 l 12 3 S_! _-271P%g r C . 9 ice' rrJ y Boring# ❑ Boring ❑ pit Ground surface elev. ft. Depth to limiting factor _in, So(I Ilcsdon Rate Horizon Depth Dominant Color Redox Description Texture Structure Consistence Boundary Roots GMT In. Munsell Qu.Sz. Cont.Color Gr.Sz,Sh. *1501 "Eff#2 ❑ Boring# ❑ Boring ❑ Pit Ground surface elev. _ft. Depth to limiting factor _In. Soil (cation Rate Horizon Depth Dominant Color Redox Description Texture Structure Consistence Boundary Roots In. Munsell Qu.Sz. Cont.Color Gr.Sz.Sh. •Eff#1 'Eff#2 "Effluent#1 =BODS>30<220 mglL and TSS>30:i 150 mg1L •Effluent#2=BOD$<_30 mglL and TSS_<30 nVt The Department of Commerce is an equal opportunity service provider and employer. If you need assistance to access services or need material in an alternate format,please contact the department at 608-266-3151 or TTY 608-264.8777. SaD-8330(R.6I00) Y Soil Test Plot :sh n Project Name Ronald Wohlers autxAddress 1282 200th Ave , N ew Richmond WI 54017 M 4#226900 Lot 7 Subdivision Wohlers Estates Date 8/16/00 SW/SE 1/4 SE 1/4S 23 T 31 N/R 18 W Township Star Prairie ❑ Boring Q Well PL Property Line County ST. CROIX BM or VRP Assume Elevation 100 ft. Top of Steel Fence Post System Elevation 89.6 *HRPSame as Benchmark Alt. BM Top of Survey Iron @ 95.6' 260' Property Line 30' B.M. Alt .M. 30' 9:OW' :B-1 40' B-3 30' 94' 40' 93' B-2 a� F - ST. CROIX COUNTY WISCONSIN ZONING DEPARTMENT • N■ ■ voted ST.CROIX COUNTY GOVERNMENT CENTER 1101 Carmichael Road w Hudson,WI 54016-7710 Phone: (715)386-4680 Fax(715)386-4686 Memo to File Fronx Pam Quinn Date: 4127/2004 Ra Sandy loam structure misinterpretation on subdivision sal r ports Recent soil on-site determinations have brought a problem to our attention. During these on- sites,bdings were excavated to confirm soil conditions where two conflicting soil reports had been submitted for zonQ department review. The soil profiles, evaluated by myself,Dave Fogerty,and Dave Steel(all certified soil testers)differed from the original soil reports in that massive(structureless)sandy loams were encountered in horizons that were described as having either moderate,medium subangular blocky(2msbk)structure by Adam SchumakerOWM0 „ There apparently has been a misunderstanding between"structure"caused by handling samples of the soil during texturing versus the soil characteristics in situ. The soil,when chunks were taken out of the profile to hand texture,with pressure parted into"crumbs"that appeared at first to be subangular or granular in shape. However,these were not true peds that broke apart along planes of weakness,but fragments created by handling. The soil when observed in the horizon did not have distinct units of structure and should have been reported as"massive". Added notation: on 4/23/04 Mark Iverson(Cedar Corp. certified professional soil scientist), Shaun Bird, and myself did an evaluation of soils on Lots 6 &9, Richmond Meadows where the original soil report described the third horizon as sandy loam, "lmgr". On Lot 6 we checked soil profiles within a POWTS distribution cell and then excavated a test pit on Lot 9. The sandy loams in question were a weak, coarse to very coarse subangular blocky structure,where planes of weakness were just discernible when peds were parted from the profile. The peds separated with very light pressure by soil tester. Sand coatings were observed on the ped faces in the Lot 9 soils,which supported the determination that some structure existed to allow water to move through the upper portion of the sandy loam horizon. However,below the weak-structured soil we found massive(structureless) sandy loams and the boundary between these horizons was irregular, which would mean a distribution cell could encounter alternating weak and massive sandy loam. Shaun said he would amend his soil reports with a memo recommending that any s 0M w''I ,,or."?vMa e'be asssighed a laws l of.0. (see attached memo ftWbfteWt Nftdows)to provide a larger dispersal arfa.. Page Two—Soil Memo 4/27/04 Massive sand loams have been assigned a soil application rate of-0.2 f 2 with th Y Sn PP t � e code ,)changes in Comm tive as of 2/1/04. The application rates listed W the soil-reports were higher due to a structure having bay described as eididr wreak or moderate- aflfects the calculations for sizing of POWTS distribution cells. Obviously, one of the concerns is to make sure loading rates for the soils are not in error and allow undersized POWTS to be installed. For example, in December 2003, Lot 35 of Richmond Meadows subdivision had to have its loading rate reduced to 0.3 gpd/sq. ft. when the installer encountered massive sandy loam at the system elevation. The sandy loam horizon had been described on the soil report as "lmgr"with firm consistence. Leroy Jansky,Dept. of Commerce Regional Wastewater Specialist, has been consulted on this situation and advised the zoning department to require on-site verifications for any lots with this potential misinterpretation on the soil reports. All soil reports with sandy loam"1 or 2 mgr"as its structure will be required to use a design based on the current code's soil application rate for massive sandy loam @ 0.2 gpd/sq. ft. unless additional soil testing proves otherwise. Z