The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About038-1202-50-000 �AJUATIO�KPORT 4trisconsin Department of Commerce �' Page Division of Safety and Buildings In accordance . mm Code`'' .- 1�►. ,.- Attach complete site plan on paper not less than 8112 hes In size.Plan rgl�po ' Include,but not limited to:vertical and horizontal refs nt(B �d Irsptfan abb��u I,D, percent slope,scale or dimensions,north arrow,and I and shc4-to road. Q M-1-Z d-2-' Please prlrrf aft lnforr SCAN tCE < evt Date Personal informalion you provide maybe used for secondary TMs rivacy je 1��4(1)( U Property Own 1/4f 1I4 T�� N R E{ Propedy is MaNing Addres>s., Lot# Stock# Subd.Name or CSM# D r I ty tee p Code Phone Number City ❑Village Town Nearest Road �� 5 X 61 ( ) "� 24d ew Construcdon Usel2KResidentiai I Number of bedrooms Code derived design flow rate GPD ❑Replacement ❑ Publi r Comm Describe: Parent material_ �'$R r� „`� Flood Plain elevation if applicable _A"IZ ft tand rem ionss,5X 5,4-e m e-/e,l) �� Ong# Boring a Pit Ground surface elev. I QIA--ft. Depth to limiting factor _in. Soil Application Rate Horizon Depth Dominant Color Redox Description Texture Structure Consistence Boundary Roots GPDOF In. Munsell Qu.Sz. Cont.Color Gr.Sz.Sh. `Eff#1 1 "0#2 e-ro Co Yr Va ^0 wa r M F 4 L n- s 53 `' ,...0 s r►F v fi `! 53-1 7, r,4 s `f FTBoring# ❑I Boring fu`pit Ground surface elev.JO--3 jt. ft. Depth to limiting factor in. Soil Amplicedon Hate Horizon Depth Dominant Color Redox Description Texture Structure Consistence Boundary Roots GPDM In. Munsell Qu.Sz. Cont.Color Gr.Sz,Sh. 'Eff#1 I 'Eff#2 10yr 7 s( F,e c Din .s `t _o 4K. 6 - '09 o �F w y - a < > < Effluent#2 eOD <30 m and TSS<30 Effluent#1 60D 30_220 Lend TSS 30_150 mg/L g�- _ mg/L CST Nam Please Print) Stgna X q 5 kaus-, J Address Date Evaluation Conducteo Telephone Number go / 0 1 Property Owner Parcel ID# _� ��_ Page of Boring# ❑ Boring Pit Ground surface elev._1 v.�ft. Depth to limiting factor In. Soil Application Rate Horizon Depth Dominant Color Redox Description Texture Structure Consistence Boundary Roots GPDNP in. Munsell Qu.Sz. Cont.Color Gr.Sz.Sh. "EfM "Eff#2 o'la vie f m: 3 a� f�b ►^� s r l >� � - � Boring# ❑ Boring ❑ Pit Ground surface elev. ft. Depth to limiting factor in. Soil Icatlon Rate Horizon Depth Dominant Color Redox Description Texture Structure Consistence Boundary Roots GPDRF In. Munsell Qu.Sz. Cont.Color Gr.Sz.Sh. 'Eff#1 "Eff#2 a Boring# ❑ Boring F-1 pit Ground surface elev._ ft, Depth to limiting factor In. Sod (cation Rate Horizon Depth Dominant Color Redox Description Texture Structure Consistence Boundary Roots GPDM In. Munsell Qu.Sz. Cont.Color Gr.Sz.Sh. '001 'Eff#2 "Effluent#1 =BOD3>30 5 220 mg1L and TSS>30:s 150 mgA- "Effluent#2-BOD6 130 mgA.and TSS<_30 mg/L The Department of Commerce is an equal opportunity service provider and employer. If you need assistance to access services or need material in an alternate format, please contact the department at 608-266-3151 or TTY 608.264-8777. SBD-8330(RAM) A - Soil Test Plot Plan Project Name Ronald Wohlers Sha Address 1282 200th Ave N ew Richmond WI 54017 C671M #226900 Lot 10 Subdivision Wohlers Estates Date 8/16/00 SW/SE 1/4 SE 1/4S 23 T 31 N/R 18 W Township StarPraine n Boring Q Well PL Property Line County ST. CROIX BM or VRP Assume Elevation 100 ft. Top of Survey Iron System Elevation 98.9 *HRPSame as Benchmark Alt. BM Top of 2" Pipe @ 100.8' Pro Town Rd. 103' B-2 102' 2% � Slop a 0 B-3 0' rn 101' 40' 20' 30' -1 0 E� 150' Alt. 244' Property Line 0 ST. CROIX COUNTY WISCONSIN •�'�'• w. ZONING DEPARTMENT ST.CRO COUNTY GOVERNMENT CENTER M M" ""�"� IX 1101 Carmichael Road Hudson,WI 54016-7710 Phone: (715)386-4680 Fax(715)386-4686 r Memo to File From: Pam Quinn Date: 4/27/2004 Re: Sandy loam structure misinterpretation on subdivision sal r Mrts Recent soil on-site determinations have brought a problem to our attention. During these on- sites,bofings were excavated to confirm soil conditions where two conflicting soil reports had been submitted for zoniflA department review. The soil profiles,evaluated by myself,Dave Fogerty,and Dave Steel(all certified soil testers)differed from the original soil reports in that massive(structureless)sandy loams were encountered in horizons that were described as having either moderate, medium subangular blocky(2msbk)structure by Adam Schumaker$ftmak„ ( Bird. There apparently has been a misunderstanding between"structure"caused by handling samples of the soil during texturing versus the soil characteristics in situ. The soil, when chunks were taken out of the profile to hand texture,with pressure parted into"crumbs"that appeared at first to be subangular or granular in shape. However,these were not true peds that broke apart along planes of weakness,but fragments created by handling. The soil when observed in the horizon did not have distinct units of structure and should have been reported as"massive". Added notation: on 4/23/04 Mark Iverson(Cedar Corp. certified professional soil scientist), Shaun Bird, and myself did an evaluation of soils on Lots 6 &9, Richmond Meadows where the original soil report described the third horizon as sandy loam, "l mgr". On Lot 6 we checked soil profiles within a POWTS distribution cell and then excavated a test pit on Lot 9. The sandy loams in question were a weak, coarse to very coarse subangular blocky structure,where planes of weakness were just discernible when peds were parted from the profile. The peds separated with very light pressure by soil tester. Sand coatings were observed on the ped faces in the Lot 9 soils,which supported the determination that some structure existed to allow water to move through the upper portion of the sandy loam horizon. However,below the weak-structured soil we found massive(structureless) sandy loams and the boundary between these horizons was irregular,which would mean a distribution cell could encounter alternating weak and massive sandy loam. Shaun said he would amend his soil reports with a memo recommending that any s "1mgr".or ,' 'be assigned a Imes,l af.0.�.; #�Z . ,. (see attached memo fbrWbfteW1 Meadows to provide a larger dispersal aria. Page Two—Soil Memo 4/27/04 Massive sandy loams have been assigned a soil application,rate of 0.2 gpd/f 2 with the code changes in Comm Live as of 2/1/04. The application rates listed can the soil,reports were higher due to structure having been described as-666r week or rnodemte;WMA affects the calculations for sizing of POWTS distribution cells. Obviously, one of the concerns is to make sure loading rates for the soils are not in error and allow undersized POWTS to be installed. For example, in December 2003, Lot 35 of Richmond Meadows subdivision had to have its loading rate reduced to 0.3 gpd/sq. ft. when the installer encountered massive sandy loam at the system elevation. The sandy loam horizon had been described on the soil report as "lmge'with firm consistence. Leroy Jansky,Dept. of Commerce Regional Wastewater Specialist,has been consulted on this situation and advised the zoning department to require on-site verifications for any lots with this potential misinterpretation on the soil reports. All soil reports with sandy loam"1 or 2 mgr"as its structure will be required to use a design based on the current code's soil application rate for massive sandy loam @ 0.2 gpd/sq. ft. unless additional soil testing proves otherwise. a