The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About038-1202-70-000 (2) Wisconsin Department of Commerce SOIL ,J ----� fJRT Page_1 or Division of Safety and Buildings ! , In accordance with Wis. r— Attach complete site plan on paper not less than 8112 x 11 i ched in size Plan must Include,but not limited to:version and horizontal reference M},direction a g�° _ I p D3 D Y l�0 2-� percent slope,scale or dimensions,north arrow,and loca' distar�� n r st r O Please print all InformaUci �' 51 , "'4 by Date -% uN � /C Personal intormeHon you provide may be used for secondary purpose (Psi4'Apy Law,a.f J: �1 G �v Q PropertyOwn 1i'operty l-o \R\ /Z a, S� / (fo . 41A ! 1/� 1/4 T / N R E(o Property rs Mailing Adi:17;„ 'a ock# Subd.Narna or CSM# �A+ Zip Code Phone Number D r k'L'417' :5 Y6 0 ❑Ciry Q Village Town Nearest Road 044ew Construction Uaeesidential/Number of bedrooms Code derived design flow rate GPD ❑Replacement ❑ Pubs oomrr�r Describe: Parent material_ /.QZl �� `��(J Flood Plain elevation If applicable IV1Jf !t, General comments and reoommendatlons's,/y (yt Boring# pit Ground surface elev._ D! ft. Depth to limiting factor ,l1 U _ in. Soil Application Rafe Horizon Depth Dominant Color Redox Description Texture Structure Consistence Boundary Roots GPD/ff In. Munsell Qu.Sz. Cont.Color Gr.Sz.Sh. •Eff#1 "Eff#2 3 r FX n S �n a ► g 1 d r �f e r r 6 l r c✓ J" 3f3- ,s " sr C 7 Boring# 0 Boring pit Ground surface elev. i ft. Depth to limiting factor 0 6 in. Sos Application Rate Horizon Depth Dominant Color Redox Description Texture Structure Consistence Boundary Roots GPD/N In, Munsell Qu.Sz. Cont.Color Gr.Sz.Sh. `Eff#1 •Eff#2 a - 3 0 / n l G5 Do, , S c f 1 f' Effluent#1 BOD >30_<220 mg/t-and T <150 `Effluent#2=SOD <30 mgt_and TSS_<30 mg/L CST use Print) slurs ,T m r cj Pease Print) 9a� Address Date Evaluation Conducted Telephone Number 7 • y Property Owner Parcel ID# Page of -31 Boring# Boring , O ,0 pit Ground surface elev. __�, oft. Depth to limiting factor d U in. --- Shc Application Rate Horizon Depth Dominant Color Redox Description Texture Structure Consistence Boundary Roots GPDNP In. MunseA Qu.Sz. Cont.Color Gr.Sz.Sh. "Etf#1 "Eff#2 1 d-9 l0 23 0 -5/ 9- o % ,--e /^,cAe o�,Z—T 36- 7 S r % 51 /r�, ni w I'U 7' a Boring# Boring ❑ pit Ground surface elev. T ft. Depth to limiting factor in. Soil lcatlon Rate Horizon Depth Dominant Color Redox Description Texture Structure Consistence Boundary Roots GPDM In, Munsell Qu.Sz. Cont.Color Gr.Sz.Sh. "00#1 "Eff#2 ❑ Boring# ❑ Boring Cl pit Ground surface elev. ft, Depth to limiting factor _in. Sod lcation Rate Fiodzon Depth Dominant Color Redox Description Texture Structure Consistence Boundary Roots OP In. Munsell Qu.Sz. Cont.Color Gr.Sz.Sh. "E11#1 "092 Effluent#1 =BODS>30 5 220 mg/L and TSS>30:S 150 mgA. 'Effluent#2 BOO,<30 mg/l.and TSS<_30 mg1L The Department of Commerce is an equal opportunity service provider and employer. If you need assistance to access services or need material in an alternate format, please contact the department at 608-266-3151 or TTY 608-264-8777. SBD.8330(R.6/00) Soil Test Plot PIa Project Name Ronald Wohlers Sha ird Address 1282 200th Ave N ew Richmond WI 54017 M #226900 Lot 12 Subdivision Wohlers Estates Date 8/16/00 SW/SE 1/4 SE 1/4S 23 T 31 N/R 18 W Township Star Prairie Boring Q Well PL Property Line County ST. CROIX BM or VRP Assume Elevation 100 ft. Top of Survey Iron System Elevation 97.0 *HRPSame as Benchmark Alt. BM Top of 1 1/2" Pipe @ 100.8 Pro Town Road Tested area does not have enough slope to establish contours <1% B-2 Slope 20' B-3 80' a� 40' a 30' -1 r rn M 80' Alt. #4 lip B.M. 190' Property Line 0 10 •-� ST. CROIX COUNTY WISCONSIN ..�/'•� w. ZONING DEPARTMENT N ■ r■ goes. ST.CROIX COUNTY GOVERNMENT CENTER 1101 Carmichael Road Hudson,WI 54016-7710 Phone: (715)386-4680 Fax(715)386-4686 �� vv Memo to File From: Pam Quinn Date: 4/27/2004 Re: Sandy loam structure misinterpretation on subdivision sat r its Recent soil on-site determinations have brought a problem to our attention. During these on- sites,boHngs were ex vated to confirm soil conditions where.two conflicting soil reports had been submitted for zonA department review. The soil profiles, evaluated by myself,Dave Fogerty,and Dave Steel(all certified soil testers)differed from the original soil reports in that massive(structureless)sandy loams were encountered in horizons that were described as having either moderate, medium subangular blocky(2msbk)structure by Adam Schumakei4VAVcal4 There apparently has been a misunderstanding between"structure"caused by handling samples of the soil during texturing versus the soil characteristics in situ. The soil, when chunks were taken out of the profile to hand texture,with pressure parted into"crumbs"that appeared at first to be subangular or granular in shape. However,these were not true peds that broke apart along planes of weakness,but fragments created by handling. The soil when observed in the horizon did not have distinct units of structure and should have been reported as"massive". Added notation: on 4/23/04 Mark Iverson(Cedar Corp. certified professional soil scientist), Shaun Bird, and myself did an evaluation of soils on Lots 6 &9,Richmond Meadows where the original soil report described the third horizon as sandy loam, "I mgr". On Lot 6 we checked soil profiles within a POWTS distribution cell and then excavated a test pit on Lot 9. The sandy loams in question were a weak, coarse to very coarse subangular blocky structure,where planes of weakness were just discernible when peds were parted from the profile. The peds separated faces in the Lot 9 observed on the ed fa with ve light pressure b soil tester. Sand coatings were P rY �P Y g soils,which supported the determination that some structure existed to allow water to move o pp through the upper portion of the sandy loam horizon. However,below the weak-structured soil we found massive(structureless) sandy loams and the boundary between these horizons was irregular,which would mean a distribution cell could encounter alternating weak and massive sandy loam. Shaun said he would amend his soil reports with a memo recommending that any s + t+ A&,,'1mgeor,'2xa W ,bc assigned a lower;loadW990WOf . (see attached memo fbt'Vf dtdWt Meadows)to provide a larger dispersal area. r i Page Two—Soil Memo 4/27/04 Massive sandy foams have been assigned a soil application rate of,0.2 gpd/fe with the code- ,hanges in Comm ,motive as of 2/1/04. The application rates listed gn the.s'Wl reports were higher due to the structure having beam described as'e ithe-i*e ak or mo+derate,:whidft affects the calculations for sizing of POWTS distribution cells. Obviously, one of the concerns is to make sure loading rates for the soils are not in error and allow undersized POWTS to be installed. For example, in December 2003, Lot 35 of Richmond Meadows subdivision had to have its loading rate reduced to 0.3 gpd/sq. ft. when the installer encountered massive sandy loam at the system ys elevation. The sandy loam horizon had been described on the soil report as "1 mgr"with firm consistence. Leroy Jansky,Dept. of Commerce Regional Wastewater Specialist, has been consulted on this situation and advised the zoning department to require on-site verifications for any lots with this potential misinterpretation on the soil reports. All soil reports with sandy loam"1 or 2 mgr"as its structure will be required to use a design based on the current code's soil application rate for massive sandy loam @ 0.2 gpd/sq. ft. unless additional soil testing proves otherwise.