The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About038-1202-80-000 (2) • �f L � I Wisconsin Department of Commerce SOIL EVAI,L1Pr�1AJ-,IEPORT p � 3 Division of Safety and Buildings ? I 1 age_ of . In accordance with Comrra,$5;Vtli' dni: Attach complete site plan on paper not less than 81/2 x 11 rocs .,size.' Plar�fi Include,but not limited to:vertical and horizontal reference poirft_ di O p I.D. percent slope,scale or dimensions,north arrow,and location rj�d{stant road. r Please print all Informatfo ; � R Date Personal information you provide may be used for secondary purpos T,ri�aey Ltd bt PropertyOwne Iry p of r-- h Gl ,�-NGJ r�1' 1/4 T / N R E Property is Mailing Add 4_ litlo'�^k ubd Name or CSM# o city " Zip Code Phone Number ❑City ❑Village XTown Nearest Road 5 Yd 1 ZI ( - -A i5New Construction UaeIN�Resldentlal/Number of bedrooms Code derived design flow rate GPD ❑Replacement ❑ Pubs Describe: Parent material 9/'!s'B,tdd.�„ Flood Plain elevation If applicable N/Jf , General comments and recommendatlonst,5X S'1—e tr ,/9,J T 1 Boring# Pit Ground surface elev,_ Z, ft, Depth to limiting factor 160 —in. Soil Application Rate Horizon Depth Dominant Color Redox Description Texture Structure Consistence Boundary Roots GPD/ft In. Munsell Qu.Sz. Cont.Color Gr.Sz Sh. `Eff#1 "Eff#2 -g l Eyr ? -t S/ S 1�1 s 51>< 1F 3 `l yrc i?/ 7 alit .v Sodng# 121--pit❑ Ong Ground surface elev. -I 7� ft, Depth to limiting factor/Q O in. Soil Application Rate Horizon Depth Dominant Color Redox Description Texture Structure Consistence Boundary Roots GPD/fF In. Munsell Qu.Sz Cont.Color Gr.Sz.Sh. `Eff#1 •Eff#2 D-! D f -7 a eae Sl m �'� G �2p" S r Effluent#1 a DOD >30 220 mg/L and TSS _150 mg/L 'Effluent#2=BOD 130 nV&and TSS 130 mg/L CST Name JPlease Print) lure I IT Number Address date Evaluation Conducted Telephone Number Property Owner Parcel ID# Page _of TBoring# ❑ Boring pit Ground surface elev._ � ft. Depth to limiting factor in. Soil ication Rate Horizon Depth Dominant Color Redox Description Texture Structure Consistence Boundary Roots GPD/ff In. Munsell flu.Sz. Cont,Color Gr.Sz.Sh. `Eff#1 `Eff#2 -1') to l r1 o� S/ s ,J J 3 gas o K % rLq S f- w _ 9 6 - n ore. ;> ❑ Boring# ❑ Boring ❑ pit Ground surface elev, ft. Depth to limiting factor _in. Soil Application Rate Horizon Depth Dominant Color Redox Description Texture Structure Consistence Boundary Roots GPD/ff In. Munsell Qu,Sz. Cont,Color Gr.Sz.Sh, `Eff#1 `Ef##2 Boring# ❑ Boring _ ❑ pit Ground surface elev.__ ft. Depth to limiting factor in. Soil Application Rate Horizon Depth Dominant Color Redox Description Texture Structure Consistence Boundary Roots GPDM In. Munsell Qu.Sz. Cont.Color Gr.Sz,Sh. `Eff#1 -Eff#2 `Effluent#1 =BOD6>30;5 220 mg/L and TSS>30 1150 mg/L 'Effluent#2=SOD,<30 mg/L and TSS 5 30 mg/L The Department of Commerce is an equal opportunity service provider and employer. If you need assistance to access services or need material in an alternate format,please contact the department at 608-266-3151 or TTY 608-264-8777. SBD4330(8.6/06) s Soil Test Plot Plan Project Name Ronald Wohlers Shaun 'r Address 1282 200th Ave N ew Richmond WI 54017 'k26900 Lot 13 Subdivision Wohlers Estates Date /16/00 SW/SE 1/4 SE 1/4S 23 T 31 N/R 18 W Township Star Prairie ❑ Boring Q Well PL Property Line County ST. CROIX BM or VRP Assume Elevation 100 ft. Top of 2" Pipe System Elevation 93.6 *HRpSame as Benchmark Alt. BM Top of Survey Iron @ 98.0' Pro Town Road 97' 98' y ftl 96' B-2 3 2% Slope '� 0 B-3 � M 40' 30' 10' Alt B.M. 17 1' Property Line 10' 4 , ST. CROIX COUNTY WISCONSIN ZONING DEPARTMENT $■s.91■n o■ gland ST.CROIX COUNTY GOVERNMENT CENTER 1101 Carmichael Road ~ Hudson,WI 54016-7710 Phone: (715)386-4680 Fax(715)386-4686 r Memo to File From: Pam Quinn Date: 4/27/2004 Re: Sandy loam structure misinterpretation on subdivision sal Mrts Recent soil on-site determinations have brought a problem to our attention. During these on- sites,bofings were ex vated to confirm soil conditions where two conflicting soil reports had been submitted for zoni department review. The soil profiles,evaluated by myself,Dave Fogerty,and Dave Steel(all certified soil testers)differed from the original soil reports in that massive(structureless)sandy loams were encountered in horizons that were described as having either moderate, medium subangular blocky(2msbk) structure by Adam Schumaker4ftmak, (-I. Bi-d. There apparently has been a misunderstanding between"structure"caused by handling samples of the soil during texturing versus the soil characteristics in situ. The soil,when chunks were taken out of the profile to hand texture,with pressure parted into"crumbs"that appeared at first to be subangular or granular in shape. However,these were not true peds that broke apart along planes of weakness,but fragments created by handling. The soil when observed in the horizon did not have distinct units of structure and should have been reported as"massive". Added notation: on 4/23/04 Mark Iverson(Cedar Corp. certified professional soil scientist), Shaun Bird, and myself did an evaluation of soils on Lots 6 &9, Richmond Meadows where the original soil report described the third horizon as sandy loam, "lmgr". On Lot 6 we checked soil profiles within a POWTS distribution cell and then excavated a test pit on Lot 9. The sandy loams in question were a weak, coarse to very coarse subangular blocky structure,where planes of weakness were just discernible when peds were parted from the profile. The peds separated with very light pressure by soil tester. Sand coatings were observed on the ped faces in the Lot 9 soils,which supported the determination that some structure existed to allow water to move through the upper portion of the sandy loam horizon. However,below the weak-structured soil we found massive(structureless) sandy loams and the boundary between these horizons was irregular,which would mean a distribution cell could encounter alternating weak and massive sandy loam. Shaun said he would amend his soil reports with a memo recommending that any ssnAu `lmge or' age be assigned a 1ory 1 of . ,; l ? (see attached memo fbr It 'fi Meadows)to provide a lager dispersal area., Page Two—Soil Memo 4/27/04 Massive sandy loams have been assigned a soil application rate of 0.2 gpd/ftz with the code ,chanwere higher due toµ a cfive as of 2/1/04. The application rates listed on the.soilreports ges in Comm itrbctu�+e having bow described as eithe r*eak or moderate;"wl tiffects the calculations for sizing of POWTS distribution cells. Obviously, one of the concerns is to make sure loading rates for the soils are not in error and allow undersized POWTS to be installed. For example, in December 2003, Lot 35 of Richmond Meadows subdivision had to have its loading rate reduced to 0.3 gpd/sq. ft. when the installer encountered massive sandy loam at the system elevation. The sandy loam horizon had been described on the soil report as "I mgr"with firm consistence. Leroy Jansky,Dept. of Commerce Regional Wastewater Specialist, has been consulted on this situation and advised the zoning department to require on-site verifications for any lots with this potential misinterpretation on the soil reports. All soil reports with sandy loam"1 or 2 mgr"as its structure will be required to use a design based on the current code's soil application rate for massive sandy loam @ 0.2 gpd/sq. ft. unless additional soil testing proves otherwise.