The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About038-1203-00-000 a Wisconsin Department of Commerce SOIL EV, ` ORT Page_!r of d Division of safety and Buildings In accordance with Comr#k' .,-Ad Cod(rett r. Attach complete site plan on paper not less than 8 112 x 11 inch i4, ze. Include,but not limited to:vertical and horizontal reference pol ( ,dire P Q ��Q 3-66 'l percent slope,scale or dimensions,north arrow,and location di$tance to nearest roa print all information. I 41 P� Re y Date Please .-_ X ! oZCf 0 Personal lnformetlon you provide may be used for secondary Proposes +riv law.s.i SiO(`y Property Own t, Pro l ' L �% 114 T 3/ N R E{ 'T vt.Lo�di/d Property er's MaitingAddr �� ,at t g , � ubd.Name or CSM# a city .Pleleli Zip Code Phone Number City Village XTown Nearest d Construction 11se- nWendal/Number of bedrooms Code derived design flow rate YCjQ GPD ❑Replacement ❑ Publii�/pr comet -Describe: — Parent material Q4 UU.4 j Yom" Flood Plain elevation If applicable /✓/A ft• Al General IN""and room ons;�,S y s� m e-le,v , 2 �6 MBoring# Bodes Pit Ground surface elev. 1(O ft. Depth to limiting factor 1(/ J in. I ipdon Rate Horizon Depth Dominant Color Redox Description Texture Structure Consistence Boundary Roots GP /fF In. Munseli Qu.Sz. Cont.Color Gr.Sz.Sh. 'EB#1 1 `911#2 l 3 S / )mor Ma C a ' �. o 4 1 S Boring ® �# , Pit Ground surface elev. �`�r ft. Depth to limiting factor los in. Soil Application Rate Horizon Depth Dominant Color Redox Description Texture Structure Consistence Boundary Roots GPWFF in. Munsell Qu.Sz- Cont.Color Gr.Sz,Sh. 'Eff#1 "Eff#2 /0 3/ ohm - C .5 , 9 ' 9 43 a a6 r � nQ / l T • `� 7 Effluent#1 =BOD a 30:220 mg/L and TSS>P 150 mg& 'Effluent#2=BOD <30 mg/L and TSS<30 nVL CST Narylease Print) X NUmber q Address Date Evaluation Conducted Telephone Number Z-6/ Property Owner_ Parcel ID# _ _ _� Page --of I `� Boring# ❑ Boring l ^5 I ❑✓'Pit Ground surface elev._ S�- ft. Depth to limiting factor y in, --- Soll Applicadon Rate Horizon Depth Dominant Color Redox Description Texture Structure Consistence Boundary Roots GPOM In. Munsell Qu.Sz. Cont.Color Gr.Sz.Sh. 'Eff#1 'Eff#2 S l0- 4' i ❑ Boling# ❑ Boring ❑ Pit Ground surface elev._ ft. Depth to limiting factor _in, Soil licaGon Rate Horizon Depth Dominant Color Redox Description Texture Structure Consistence Boundary Roots GPDM In. Munsell Qu.Sz. Cont,Color Gr.Sz.Sh. 'Eff#1 'Eff#2 i a Boring# ❑ Baring — — ❑ Pit Ground surface elev. ft. Depth to limiting factor in. Soil (cation Rate Horizon Depth Dominant Color Redox Description Texture Structure Consistence Boundary Roots PD In. Munsell Qu.Sz. Cont.Color Gr.Sz.Sh. "Eff#1 'Eff#2 Effluent#1 =BOD5>30:E 220 mg/L and TSS>30:5 150 mg/L `Effluent#2=BOD,<_30 mglL and TS8 5 30 mg/L The Department of Commerce is an equal opportunity service provider and employer. if you need assistance to access services or need material in an alternate format, please contact the department at 608-266-3151 or TTY 608.264.8777. SBD-8330(R.6l00) Soil Test Plot Plan Project Name Ronald Wohlers Sha Address 1282 200th Ave N ew Richmond WI 54017 M #226900 Lot 15 Subdivision Wohlers Estates Date 8/16/00 SW/SE 1/4 SE 1/4S 23 T 31 N/R 18 W Township Star Prairie Boring Q Well PL Property Line County ST. CROIX BM or VRP Assume Elevation 100 ft. Top of Steel Fence Post System Elevation 91 .2 *HRPSame as Benchmark Alt. BM Top of Survey Iron @ 95.7' 40' Alt Property .M. Line B-1 � 35' 10' B.M. 98' Property Line i 30' 7 1% B-3 60' Slope B-2 Not a significant enough 01 27' slope for contour lines Property Line Shed 198' Property Line r ST. CROIX COUNTY WISCONSIN ZONING DEPARTMENT M■ ■ n��r ST.CROIX COUNTY GOVERNMENT CENTER 1101 Carmichael Road w Hudson, WI 54016-7710 Phone: (715)386-4680 Fax(715)386-4686 Memo to File From: Pam Quinn Date: 4/27/2004 Re: Sandy loam structure misinterpretation on subdivision sal Mrts Recent soil on-site determinations have brought a problem to our attention. During these on- sites,boRngs were excavated to confirm soil conditions where two conflicting soil reports had been submitted for zoniflA department review. The soil profiles,evaluated by myself,Dave Fogerty, and Dave Steel(all certified soil testers)differed from the original soil reports in that massive(structureless)sandy loams were encountered in horizons that were described as having either moderate,medium subangular blocky(2msbk)structure by Adam Schumake141e0l,.. (J gr� tiiBird. There apparently has been a misunderstanding between"structure"caused by handling samples of the soil during texturing versus the soil characteristics in situ. The soil, when chunks were taken out of the profile to hand texture,with pressure parted into"crumbs"that appeared at first to be subangular or granular in shape. However,these were not true peds that broke apart along planes of weakness,but fragments created by handling. The soil when observed in the horizon did not have distinct units of structure and should have been reported as"massive". Added notation: on 4/23/04 Mark Iverson(Cedar Corp. certified professional soil scientist), Shaun Bird, and myself did an evaluation of soils on Lots 6 &9, Richmond Meadows where the original soil report described the third horizon as sandy loam, "I mgr". On Lot 6 we checked soil profiles within a POWTS distribution cell and then excavated a test pit on Lot 9. The sandy loams in question were a weak, coarse to very coarse subangular blocky structure,where planes of weakness were just discernible when peds were parted from the profile. The peds separated on the ed faces in the Lot 9 with ve Ii ht pressure b soil tester. Sand coatings were observed p rY �P Y g soils,which supported the determination that some structure existed to allow water to move through the upper portion of the sandy loam horizon. However,below the weak-structured soil we found massive(structureless) sandy loams and the boundary between these horizons was irregular,which would mean a distribution cell could encounter alternating weak and massive sandy loam. Shaun said he would amend his soil reports with a memo recommending that any s _. : + "lmge'or-'Z ae'be assigwd-a lower,Ioadb0-.!0.3;a$W02 (see attached memo ftWbftftff,Meadows)to provide a IsMer dispersal aria. Page Two—Soil Memo 4/27/04 Massive sandy loams have been assigned a soil application-rate of-0.2 gpd/fl2 with the code - ages in Comm five as of 2/1/0=4. The application rates listed gn the.soil reports were higher due to� ,structure having been described as eithdrweak or moderate�whidh affects the calculations for sizing of POWTS distribution cells. Obviously, one of the concerns is to make sure loading rates for the soils are not in error and allow undersized POWTS to be installed. For example, in December 2003, Lot 35 of Richmond Meadows subdivision had to have its loading rate reduced to 0.3 gpd/sq. ft. when the installer encountered massive sandy loam at the system elevation. The sand loam horizon had been described on the soil Ys y report as 1 m gi, with firm consistence. Leroy Jansky, Dept. of Commerce Regional Wastewater Specialist, has been consulted on this situation and advised the zoning department to require on-site verifications for any lots with this potential misinterpretation on the soil reports. All soil reports with sandy loam"1 or 2 mgr"as its structure will be required to use a design based on the current code's soil application rate for massive sandy loam @ 0.2 gpd/sq. ft. unless additional soil testing proves otherwise.