The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About038-1203-90-000i Wisconsin Department of Commerce SOIL EVALU, 4 EP( RT Page of--� Division of Safety and Bulldings - In accordance with Comm 4 Wis. Adm.'t'ddat/ ty r,, Attach complete site plan on paper not less than 8112 x 11 inchWs In size.Plarr�NU_, 4�road,include,but not ft ted to:vertical and horizontal reference point(BM),d1 1 Lpercent slope,scale or dimensions,north arrow,and location drid_distance tarest Please print off Information.{ `` ( 2 ? 2Q® R �4b, Date Personal information you provide may be used for secondary purposeA(F Ivpcy LaA�s�`15Aa eO)'� /--'I Qd Property Own Prop DOE r. �;; GctTIJ�`S,Gyf 1!4 T 3 N R E{ Property is Malling Add �tot#i_,. bd.Name or CSI# Zip Code Phorfe Number ❑City ❑Village Town Nearest Road ew Construction UselMILResidentiat/Number of bedrooms Code derived design flow rate GPD ❑Replacement ❑ Publlice/p room m -Describe: — Parent material— �l .r-r°�e`er Flood PI ' elevation if applicable N/Jfr ft. General s _ S,r' and reoommenda*ms,5y s.1—e m e-,le,L) ILI- Bori Boring# ng in• a Pit Ground surface elev. 6_ft. Depth to limiting factor In. Soil APOIcation Rate Horizon Depth Dominant Color Redox Description Texture Structure Consistence Boundary Roots GPD/fP In. Munseil Qu.Sz. Cont Color Or.Sz,Sh. `Eff#1 `Eff#2 12-038 , d ❑ Boring A ® �# o-pit Ground surface slev. l 7, S ft. Depth to limiting factor I Z O in. Son Applicadon Bate Horizon Depth Dominant Color Redox Description Texture Structure Consistence Boundary Roots GPDM In. Mansell Qu.Sz. Cont Color Gr,Sz.Sh. I `Eff#1 `Eff#2 LY ► o� a � 3i ,,� si � � a�, .s a y 2 r'o +'ja l lv `Effluent 01 =BCC >30 1220 mg1L and TSS>30=1 So `Effluent#2=BOD 130 mg/L and TSS 130 mg/l CST Name Please Print) to iT Number " Address Date Evaluation Conduotec Telephone Number -7 Krz go Property Owner Parcel ID# Page --of Boring# ] Boring a Pit Ground surface elev. �� ft. Depth to IimitIng factor_j 2 V In, Soli Application Rate Horizon Depth Dominant Color Redox Description Texture Structure Consistence Boundary Roots GPDlig In. Munsell Qu.Sz. Cont.Color Gr.Sz.Sh. `Eff#t 'EA#2 -M C I 2M Fz 1 , v -)t '7, 7 L� Boring# ❑ Boring (�J ❑ Pit Ground surface elev. _ft. Depth to limiting factor _ in. Soil lication Rate Horizon Depth Dominant Color Redox Description Texture Structure Consistence Boundary Roots GPDAF In. Munsell Qu,Sz. Cont,Color Gr.Sz.Sh. `Ef#1 'Eff#2 F-1 Boring# ❑ Boring ❑ pit Ground surface elev.__ ft. Depth to Ifmlting fader in. Shc ication Rate Horizon Depth Dominant Color Redox Description Texture Structure Consistence Boundary Roots In. Munsell Qu.Sz. Cont.Color Gr.Sz.Sh. *Ef'f#1 'Eft Effluent#1 =BODS>30 1220 mglL and TSS>30:<150 mglL `Effluent#2=BODr<_30 mgA.and TSS 5 30 m 1. The Department of Commerce is an equal opportunity service provider and employer. if you need assistance to access services or need material in an alternate format, please contact the department at 608-266-3151 or TTY 608-264.8777. 860.8330(R.6100) l Soil Test Plot Plan Project Name Ronald Wohlers Shaun Address 1282 200th Ave N ew Richmond WI 54017 #226900 Lot 24 Subdivision Wohlers Estates Date 8/16/00 SW/SE 1/4 SE 1/4S 23 T 31 N/R 18 W Township Star Prairie ❑ Boring 0 Well PL Property Line County ST. CROIX BM or VRP Assume Elevation 100 ft. Top of Steel Fence Post System Elevation 92.1 *HRPSame as Benchmark Alt. BM Top of Steel Fence Post @ 100.0' 293' 155' B.M. 80' Alt Property dd Line 3% 15' SlopeB-1 80' B-2 30' 96' 40' B-3 97' 98' a� a� 0 Pro Town Road r ST. CROIX COUNTY WISCONSIN ..d' '. u.-IN, ZONING DEPARTMENT N N M N■N■ M,.e ST.CROIX COUNTY GOVERNMENT CENTER 1101 Carmichael Road Hudson,WI 54016-7710 w —•-- "..._` — Phone: (715)386-4680 Fax(715)386-4686 Memo to File s Fran: Pam Quinn P/-e- Dawn 4/27/2004 Re; Sandy loam structure misinterpretation on subdivision soil ports Recent soil on-site determinations have brought a problem to our attention. During these on- sites,bofings were excavated to confirm soil conditions where two conflicting soil reports had been submitted for zog department review. The soil profiles,evaluated by myself,Dave Fogerty,and Dave Steel(all certified soil testers)differed from the original soil reports in that massive(structureless)sandy loams were encountered in horizons that were described as having either moderate, medium subangular blocky(2msbk)structure by Adam SchumakerGOVeak,: There apparently has been a misunderstanding between"structure"caused by handling samples of the soil during texturing versus the soil characteristics in situ. The soil, when chunks were taken out of the profile to hand texture,with pressure parted into "crumbs"that appeared at first to be subangular or granular in shape. However,these were not true peds that broke apart along planes of weakness,but fragments created by handling. The soil when observed in the horizon did not have distinct units of structure and should have been reported as"massive". Added notation: on 4/23/04 Mark Iverson(Cedar Corp. certified professional soil scientist), Shaun Bird, and myself did an evaluation of soils on Lots 6 &9,Richmond Meadows where the original soil report described the third horizon as sandy loam, "I mgr". On Lot 6 we checked soil profiles within a POWTS distribution cell and then excavated a test pit on Lot 9. The sandy loams in question were a weak, coarse to very coarse subangular blocky structure,where planes of weakness were just discernible when peds were parted from the profile. The peds separated with yM li t pressure by soil tester. Sand coatings were observed on the ped faces in the Lot 9 soils,which supported the determination that some structure existed to allow water to move through the upper portion of the sandy loam horizon. However,below the weak-structured soil we found massive(structureless) sandy loams and the boundary between these horizons was irregular,which would mean a distribution cell could encounter alternating weak and massive sandy loam. Shaun said he would amend his soil reports with a memo recommending that any l 4A s ,}. ,.1 .or,-`2. be assi -a lawer, � _�3t, - see attached memo Vfh t tl Meadows)to provide a larger dispersal area. ( I r Page Two—Soil Memo 4/27/04 Massive sandy foams have been assigned a soil application rate of-0.2 gpd/fe with the code Ranges in Comm J tine as of 2/1/04. The application rates listed go the.soil reports were higher due tot structure having boon described A-'ether weak or moderate;Kieft affects the calculations for sizing of POWTS distribution cells. Obviously, one of the concerns is to make sure loading rates for the soils are not in error and allow undersized POWTS to be installed. For example, in December 2003, Lot 35 of Richmond Meadows subdivision had to have its loading rate reduced to 0.3 gpd/sq. ft. when the installer encountered massive sandy loam at the system elevation. The sandy loam horizon had been desc ri bed o n the soil report as "1 mgr"with firm consistence. Leroy Jansky,Dept. of Commerce Regional Wastewater Specialist, has been consulted on this situation and advised the zoning department to require on-site verifications for any lots with this potential misinterpretation on the soil reports. All soil reports with sandy loam"1 or 2 mgr"as its structure will be required to use a design based on the current code's soil application rate for massive sandy loam @ 0.2 gpd/sq. ft. unless additional soil testing proves otherwise.