The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About038-1204-20-000 Wsconsin Department of commerce SOIL 1h4LUAT ON REkQ Page_ of Division of Safety and Buildings In accordance with Con-#n 85,Wis. Attach complete site plan on paper not less than 8 1/2 x 11 Inches in size.Plan must Col) ' include,but not limited to:vertical and horizontal reference point(SM),dire Ftkg r'arq Par ' percent slope,scale or dimensions,north arrow,and location alic{tlistanc bares�� l Please print all Information. - `a SCOUoir� rR by Date Personal Information you Provide maybe used fors ondary purposes(Pr' q�lays.t s�a1S(m)). Property Own 9 ' "� r ZTrok1=SG 1/q/ 114 T / N R E Property er's Melling Add r J�Ot# Block# Subd Nam or CSM# a � Y city t' Zip Code Phone Number ❑city ❑Village ATown Nearest Road lie�sa 75�� w Construction llsal- aelitnMential/Number of bedrooms Code derived design flow rate GPD ❑Replacement ❑ PublW corn Describe: Parent material_ r�� Flood Plain elevation if applicable ft• General comments .1 and recommendationsL5"V 5�'L° IYl P�l�J X. tt /�o• D /J7L- ±kkd2 M Boring# Boring q Pit Ground surface elev._ ( (0• � ft• Depth to limiting factor_� in. Soil Application Rate Hofixon Depth Dominant Color Redox Description Texture Structure Consistence Boundary Roots GP In. Munsell Qu.Sz. Cont.Color Gr.Sz.Sh, (� 'Eff#1 `E02 312 , / d w s Pip Boring Zo # p Boring } ® �Plt Ground surface elev. �'(�ft. Depth to limiting factor J`" �• Soil ApplicaUcin Rate Horim Depth Dominant Cola Redox Description Texture Structure Consistence Boundary Roots GPDffF In, Munsell Qu.Sz. Cont.Color Gr.Sz.Sh. 'Eff#1 40#2 . Lf. 50- b `Effluent#1 =BOD >30 1220 mg/L and TSS>30:<150 mg/L 'Effluent#2=BOD <_30 mg/L and TSS 5 30 nVVL CST Name! Please Print) I lure ��N Address Date Evaluation Conducted Telephone Number L Property Owner __ Parcel ID# _ -_r Page --of Boring# ] Boring 1:1 u Pit Ground surface elev._ p ft. Depth to limiting factor ✓`' in. SoIE Application Rate Horizon Depth Dominant Color Redox Description Texture Structure Consistence Boundary Roots GPOM In. Munsell Qu.Sz. Cont.Color Gr.Sz.Sh. "Eff#1 "Ef#2 1 D-I o v �/ S/ Xr 3- . 5 ❑ Boeing# ❑ Boring ❑ pit Ground surface elev. ft. Depth to limiting factor in._ — Soil Application Rate Horizon Depth Dominant Color Redox Description Texture Structure Consistence Boundary Roots GPD/fF In. Munsell Qu.Sz. Cont.Color Gr.Sz.Sh, "Eff#1 "Eff#2 F-1 Boring# [] Boring — ❑ Pit Ground surface elev.__ ft. Depth to limiting factor in. Soil Application Rate Horizon Depth Dominant Color Redox Description Texture Structure Consistence Boundary Roots P In, Munsell Qu.Sz. Cont.Color Gr,Sz.Sh. "001 "Eff#2 "Effluent#1 =BOD,>30<220 mg/L and TSS>30:<150 mg/L "Effluent#2=BOD6=30 mg/L and TS8_<30 mg/L The Department of Commerce is an equal opportunity service provider and employer. If you need assistance to access services or need material in an alternate format,please contact the department at 608-266-3151 or TTY 608-264-8777. SBD.8330(R.6/00) Soil Test Plot Plan / Project Name Ronald Wohlers Sha `r rd Address 1282 200th Ave N ew Richmond WI 54017 TM #226900 Lot 27 Subdivision Wohlers Estates Date 8/16/00 SW/SE 1/4 SE 1/4S 23 T 31 N/R 18 W Township Star Prairie ❑ Boring 0 Well PL Property Line County ST. CROIX BM or VRP Assume Elevation 100 ft. Top of Steel Fence Post System Elevation 96.0 *HRpSame as Benchmark Alt. BM Top of Survey Pipe @ 95.7' Pro Town Road Site has 0% Slope and thus no contours B-2 15' B-1 5' 100' rB.M.NB-M- LOU 3 45Property lt.Line Post 376' Property Line 45' ' ST. CROIX COUNTY 1� WISCONSIN ZONING DEPARTMENT :� ago/M N■N N sour ST.CROIX COUNTY GOVERNMENT CENTER 1101 Carmichael Road ~ + Hudson,WI 54016-7710 Phone: (715)386-4680 Fax(715)3864686 r �� vv Memo to File From: Pam Quinn Date: 4/27/2004 Re: Sandy loam structure misinterpretation on subdivision sal r Mrts D� Recent soil on-site determinations have brought a problem to our attention. During these on- sites,bofings were ex vated to confirm soil conditions where.two conflicting soil reports had been submitted for zoniflk department review. The soil profiles, evaluated by myself,Dave Fogerty,and Dave Steel(all certified soil testers)differed from the original soil reports in that massive(structureless)sandy loams were encountered in horizons that were described as having either moderate, medium subangular blocky(2msbk)structure by Adam SchumakerINNOreak„ '(ll. -w Bird. There apparently has been a misunderstanding between"structure"caused by handling samples of the soil during texturing versus the soil characteristics in situ. The soil,when chunks were taken out of the profile to hand texture,with pressure parted into"crumbs"that appeared at first to be subangulaz or granular in shape. However,these were not true peds that broke apart along planes of weakness,but fragments created by handling. The soil when observed in the horizon did not have distinct units of structure and should have been reported as"massive". Added notation: on 4/23/04 Mark Iverson(Cedar Corp. certified professional soil scientist), Shaun Bird, and myself did an evaluation of soils on Lots 6 &9, Richmond Meadows where the original soil report described the third horizon as sandy loam, "I mgr". On Lot 6 we checked soil profiles within a POWTS distribution cell and then excavated a test pit on Lot 9. The sandy foams in question were a weak, coarse to very coarse subangulaz blocky structure,whe re p lanes of weakness were just discernible when peds were P arted fro m the profile. The eds separated eLot9 with very light pressure by soil tester. Sand coatings were ob served on the p ed faces in th soils,which supported the determination that some structure existed to allow water to move through the upper portion of the sandy loam horizon. However,below the weak-structured soil we found massive(structureless) sandy loams and the boundary between these horizons was irregular, which would mean a distribution cell could encounter alternating weak and massive sandy loam. Shaun said he would amend his soil reports with a memo recommending that any - t ,«Imgr"or,`2m "be assigueda 10wt 104th `ON-3 0# , (see attached memo Mft Meadow)to provide a larger dis area. '�f Page Two—Soil Memo 4/27/04 Massive sandy foams have been assigned a soil application rate of-0.2 gpd/f 2 with the code> changes in Comm dive as of 2/1/04. The application rates listed the soil aPP (� its were higher due to structure having bow described ai 6thet*eak or vnoderate,�Vhieh iffwts the calculations for sizing of POWTS distribution cells. Obviously, one of the concerns is to make sure loading rates for the soils are not in error and allow undersized POWTS to be installed. For example, in December 2003, Lot 35 of Richmond Meadows subdivision had to have its loading rate reduced to 0.3 gpd/sq. ft. when the installer encountered massive sandy loam at the system elevation. The ys sandy loam horizon had been described on the soil report as 1 m with firm consistence. Leroy Jansky,Dept. of Commerce Regional Wastewater Specialist, has been consulted on this situation and advised the zonin g P require department to on-site verifications for any lots with this potential misinterpretation on the soil reports. All soil reports with sandy loam"1 or 2 mgr"as its structure will be required to use a design based on the current code's soil application rate for massive sandy loam @ 0.2 gpd/sq. ft. unless additional soil testing proves otherwise.