Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout038-1204-30-000 Wisconsin Department of Commerce SOIL >it�fiRIOR fPT Page `of Division of Safety and Buildings �.• �,. In accordance with C'd�l .t}� wis. �ryr„t de �C��`'` Attach complete site plan on paper not less than 81/2 x 11 in i�size,FF�rt�must r ' include,but not limited to:vertical and horizontal reference po ),direction Vdr) 2© P U� y percent slope,scale or dimensions,north arrow,and location ti lstance tgr�eal�8t raad, +– D/^ 0 Please print all informatlon.,�:% \' �h S� C�P�p-X R by Date Personal Information provide may be used ondary purposes(�rJrfc }ew,S.15.64RTJ. ,! G You P� Y PropertyONme '�'�Opem!LO /" GC. �! ,iL -1!q/ 1/4 T � N R E( property �s Mailing Add LQt,� Block# Sutxl.Name or{SM# p� O r CRY Phone Number ❑City C:]Village Town Nearest Road Construction Use;V- I�Residential/Number of bedrooms Code delved design flow rate GPD ❑Replacement ❑ Publl V comm Describe: _- Parent material L .w.._-�—.a Flood Plain elevation If applicable /V/Jf Ift General corlrwnerts �`� S I b and recommendations/.Ci4– m ei��!)GL%� �J ' Z `/ – C a Boring# ['� Boring 1�[yi pit Ground surface elev. °�ft. Depth to limiting factor. in. $oil ICatbn Rate Hofton Depth Dominant Color Redox Description Texture Structure Consistence Boundary Roots In, Munsell Qu.Sz. Cont.Color r Gr.Sz.Sh. •Eff#1 •Efr#2 J 0-9 l a 3 h r,•c SI a m f ni . 5 , 9 S I -P 7 Q rn a tv A a g- 17, r y -K Bon # soft ® Pit s Ground surface elev. I ,P 7 ft. Depth to limiting factor' in. Soil Aloplicaticirl Rate Horizon Depth Dominant Color Redox Description Texture Structure Consistence Boundary Roots GPD/fP in. Munsell Qu.Sz. Cont.Color Gr.Sz.Sh. 'Eff#1 `Eff#2 1/a S! /✓1 CS S ..v Effluent#1 =SOD >30=220 mg/L and TSS>30:<1 'Effluent 02=BOD <30 mg/L and TSS<30 ffok CST NameejPlease Print) i 67l) Address Date Evaluation Conducted Telephone Number ld4 9� ! r Property Owner Parcel ID#_ _.—— Page --of a Boring# ❑� Boring ;I Pit Ground surface elev._��i_-ft. Depth to limiting factor In. Soll Application Rate Horizon Depth Dominant Color Redox Description Texture Structure Consistence Boundary Roots OPON In. Munsell Qu.Sz. Cont.Color Gr.Sz.Sh. "Eff#1 "Eff#2 a m cs �, 9 ❑ Boring# ❑ Boring --- ❑ pit Ground surface elev. ft. Depth to limiting factor _in, $Dti Appliesbon Rate Horizon Depth Dominant Color Redox Description Texture Structure Consistence Boundary Roots GPDIff In. Munsell Qu.Sz. Cont.Color Gr.Sz.Sh. "Eff#1 "Eff#2 Boring# ❑ Boring — ❑ Pit Ground surface elev. ft. Depth to limiting factor in. Soil (cation Rate Horizon Depth Dominant Color Redox Description Texture Structure Consistence Boundary Roots GPDM In. Munsell Qu.Sz. Cont.Color Gr.Sz.Sh. •Eff#1 "Eff#2 "Effluent#1 =SOD,>30:S 220 mg/L and TSS>30:<150 mglL 'Effluent#2=BODs 130 mg/L and TSS 5 30 mg& The Department of Commerce is an equal opportunity service provider and employer. if you need assistance to access services or need material in an alternate format,please contact the department at 608-266-3151 or TTY 608-264-8777. SOD-8"O(R.640) ' Soil Test Plot Pla Project Name Ronald Wohlers Sha ird Address 1282 200th Ave N ew Richmond WI 54017 M #226900 Lot 28 Subdivision Wohlers Estates Date 8/16/00 SW/SE 1/4 SE 1/43 23 T 31 N/R 18 W Township Star Prairie ❑ Boring Q Well PL Property Line County ST. CROIX BM or VRP Assume Elevation 100 ft. Top of 2" Pipe System Elevation 95.2 *HRPSame as Benchmark Alt. BM Top of 1 1/2" Pipe @ 98.3' 2% Slope b 99' 98' 97' o H B-3 40' r 30' B-1 B-2 80' 20' 304' Property Line *B. Alt 100' 10' t - , ST. CROIX COUNTY WISCONSIN ZONING DEPARTMENT to ST.CROIX COUNTY GOVERNMENT CENTER N M N Run ...Nr 1101 Carmichael Road Hudson,WI 54016-7710 a" ,�,,__ -✓ Phone: (715)386-4680 Fax(715)386-4686 n � Memo to File s Forte Pam Quinn Date: 4/27/2004 Re: Sandy loam structure misinterpretation on subdivision soil r ports Recent soil on-site determinations have brought a problem to our attention. During these on- sites,boatngs were excavated to confirm soil conditions where two conflicting soil reports had been submitted for zonifli department review. The soil profiles,evaluated by myself,Dave Fogerty, and Dave Steel(all certified soil testers)differed from the original soil reports in that massive(structureless)sandy loams were encountered in horizons that were described as having either moderate, medium subangular blocky(2msbk)structure by Adam Schumaked0fttcak, Bitrd. There apparently has been a misunderstanding between"structure"caused by handling samples of the soil during texturing versus the soil characteristics in situ. The soil,when chunks were taken out of the profile to hand texture, with pressure parted into"crumbs"that appeared at first to be subangular or granular in shape. However,these were not true peds that broke apart along planes of weakness,but fragments created by handling. The soil when observed in the horizon did not have distinct units of structure and should have been reported as"massive". Added notation: on 4/23/04 Mark Iverson(Cedar Corp. certified professional soil scientist), Shaun Bird, and myself did an evaluation of soils on Lots 6 &9, Richmond Meadows where the original soil report described the third horizon as sandy loam, "I mgr". On Lot 6 we checked soil profiles within a POWTS distribution cell and then excavated a test pit on Lot 9. The sandy loams in question were a weak, coarse to very coarse subangular blocky structure,where planes of weakness were just discernible when peds were parted from the profile. The peds separated with verlight pressure by soil tester. Sand coatings were observed on the ped faces in the Lot 9 soils,which supported the determination that some structure existed to allow water to move through the upper portion of the sandy loam horizon. However,below the weak-structured soil we found massive(structureless) sandy loams and the boundary between these horizons was irregular, which would mean a distribution cell could encounter alternating weak and massive sandy loam. Shaun said he would amend his soil reports with a memo recommending that any rage"or."Z rngr"<be assigned:a Tawas l ftlo0ofV.3,0#.AZ (see attached memo fffVMtdWt,Meadows)to provide a WSer dispersal area., .7 \ Page Two—Soil Memo 4/27/04 Massive sandy loans have been assigned a soil application rate of-0.2 gpd/ftz with the code ages in Comm motive as of 2/1/04. The application rates listed on the soil reports. were higher due to the structu a twig been described as eitl er+weak or moderate;-whA erects tm calculations for sizing of POWTS dishibution cells. Obviously, one of the concerns is to make sure loading rates for the soils are not in error and allow undersized POWTS to be installed. For example, in December 2003, Lot 35 of Richmond Meadows subdivision had to have its loading rate reduced to 0.3 gpd/sq. ft. when the installer encountered massive sandy loam at the system elevation. The sandy loam horizon had been described on the soil report as "I mgr"with firm consistence. Leroy Jansky,Dept. of Commerce Regional Wastewater Specialist,has been consulted on this situation and advised the zoning department to require on-site verifications for any lots with this potential misinterpretation on the soil reports. All soil reports with sandy loam"1 or 2 mgr"as its structure will be required to use a design based on the current code's soil application rate for massive sandy loam @ 0.2 gpd/sq. ft. unless additional soil testing proves otherwise. I II i