HomeMy WebLinkAbout034-1087-20-075 (2) BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT
ST. CROIX COUNTY, WISCONSIN
The Application of: DECISION
Walter & Deborah Briskie File No. 76-92
A hearing was held in the above referenced matter on Nov. 23 , 1992
before the St. Croix County Board of Adjustment, Chairperson John
Bradley and members, Jerome Neuman, Robert Stephens, Bernard
Kinney, and George Menter.
The applicant, Walter & Deborah Briskie, whose address is 2911 -
72nd Ave. , Hersey, WI 54027 requests a special exception permit
pursuant to section 17.18(1)r) of the St. Croix County zoning
ordinance for the following described parcel of land, which
applicant owns located in the SW 1/4 of the SW 1/4 of Section 28,
T29N-R15W, Town of Springfield, St. Croix County, Wisconsin.
The applicant proposes to add a thirty by thirty (30x30) addition
onto the existing building and expand the grinding business.
FINDINGS OF FACT
1) The existing business is in a thirty by thirty-two (30x32)
building.
2) The existing operation needs to upgrade its electrical and
structural components to meet existing commercial codes.
3) The applicant owns the adjoining properties.
4) The township of Springfield supports the expansion of this use.
5) Currently there is no approved sanitary system available for the
property.
CONCLUSIONS OF LAW
The Board of Adjustment has the authority to grant special
exception use permits as per 17.70(7) of the Zoning Ordinance and
variances as per 17.70(c)3 of the ordinance.
ILHR 83 required all commercial facilities to provide sanitary
services.
DECISION
Based on the finding of fact and conclusions of law, the
application of Walter & Deborah Briskie for a special exception use
permit is conditionally approved with the following conditions:
1) The thirty by thirty (30x30) addition be no closer than the
existing structure to the township road;
2) All commercial building codes be met;
3) OSHA and EPA requirements be met for handling and storage of
hazardous materials;
4) Code compliant septic system be installed.
NAME YES/NO
voting: John Bradley yes
Bernard Kinney yes
George Menter yes
Robert Stephens yes
Jerome Neuman yes
This decision expires after one year from the date of the decision.
If the proposal is not commenced within that time, a new
application must be submitted and approved before proceeding with
the proposal. If the proposal is not completed within that time,
an extension of the decision must be obtained.
This decision may be revoked by the Board after notice and hearing
if any condition of the decision is violated.
This decision may be appealed by any person aggrieved by the
decision by filing with the St. Croix County Circuit Court an
action for certiorari within thirty (30) days of the date of filing
this decision. Applicant assumes all risk of relying on this
decision.-within the thirty (30) day appeal period.
John Bradley , Chairman Filed:
DATE: Dec. 28, 1992
1 Y
BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT MEETING AND HEARING
November 23, 1992
(This meeting was recorded by a court reporter)
The meeting was called to order by Chairman Bradley at 8:00 A.M.
Bradley explained the procedures of the hearing, requesting that
individuals wishing to testify sign their names and addresses on
the sheet in the front of the room.
Supervisors Kinney, Stephens, Menter, Neuman, and Bradley were all
in attendance. Staff included Tom Nelson, Zoning Administrator and
Greg Timmerman, Corporation Counsel.
Menter made a motion seconded by Stephens to approve the agenda.
Motion carried.
Bradley made a motion to approve the minutes as corrected.
Seconded by Stephens. Motion carried.
The next regular meeting will be December 29, 1992.
OLD BUSINESS
AMES CONSTRUCTION
Greg Paranto presented an amendment to his original request for a
nonmetallic mining application for the mining of clay. The new
information included a two (2) year limit on the mining and
restoration activities.
The total depth of the excavation will be no deeper than ten (10)
feet, taking about twenty-five thousand (25000) cubic yards of
material.
Motion by Stephens, seconded by Menter to approve the request as
presented restricting it to a two (2) year operation period.
Motion carried.
JON-DE FARM
Keith Rodli, attorney representing the township of Rush river
expressed concerns for a hospital barn that was recently
constructed.
Nelson stated that the hospital barn had no reflection on the
decision of number of animal units permitted by the Jon-De
operation.
� �.
A building permit is required but could not be refused if a proper
application was submitted.
Discussion on building and waste management plan.
MARZOLF AND MUELLER
Nelson presented a letter from Dan Koich, DNR, who objected to the
conditional approvals granted by the Board of Adjustment on these
properties. In his letter he is requesting that it be reconsidered
and denied because of the objections of the DNR.
Motion by Kinney, seconded by Stephens to leave the decision as it
stands in part because of the conflicting testimony given by DNR.
Roll call vote: Kinney, yes; Stephens, yes; Menter, yes; Neuman,
no; Bradley, no.
Motion carried to leave the decision as originally granted.
NEW BUSINESS
Hearing was called to order at 8:30 A.M. Nelson read the notice of
the hearing as published:
1. ARTICLE: 17.14(6) (h) Exceeding No. of animal units
APPELLANT: Gary Duclos/Duclos Farms
LOCATION: Part of the NW 1/4 of Sec. 9, T28N-R19W,
Town of Troy
2. ARTICLE: 17.15(6) (a) Duplex
APPELLANT: LaVerne & Rosella Kattre
LOCATION: NE 1/4 of the SW 1/4 of Sec. 3, T30N-R18W,
Town of Richmond
3. ARTICLE: 17.18(1) (r) Expanding a commercial enterprise
APPELLANT: Walter & Deborah Briskie
LOCATION: SW 1/4 of the SW 1/4 of Sec. 28, T29N-R15W,
Town of Springfield
4. ARTICLE: 17.64(1) (c) Road setback
APPELLANT: Gerald Brennan
LOCATION: N 1/2 of the SE 1/4 of Sec. 30, T30N-R18W,
Town of Richmond
5. ARTICLE: 17.64(5) (2) Driveway separation
APPELLANT: Thomas F. Marson
LOCATION: NE 1/4 of the NE 1/4 and the NW 1/4 of the NW
1/4 of Sec. 9, T28N-R19W, Town of Troy
6. ARTICLE: 17.35(5) (C)1 Setback from bluff
17. 31(5) (1) Filling and grading
APPELLANT: Marc Putman/Dr. John Foker
LOCATION: Gov't Lot 1, Sec. 36, T28N-R20W,
Town of Troy
r
GARY DUCLOS/DUCLOS FARMS
Nelson read a letter from Gary Duclos stating that he was
withdrawing his application and that he would operate his farm in
accordance to the St. Croix County Zoning ordinance.
Discussion.
LAVERNE & ROSELLA KATTRE
Nelson stated that this proposal was for a duplex in the Ag.-
Residential district of Richmond Township. He outlined the
standards that should be considered when reviewing this
application.
Rosella presented her request stating that they were selling the
residence and the new owners wanted to make sure it had the proper
permits.
Discussion on the existing construction.
WALTBR & DB KWM BRISKIB
'falter presented a request for special exception to expand his
grinding business by adding onto the existing building.
The current structure is also too close to the town road and
requires a setback variance.
Discussion on lot size, septic system, and commercial code
'requirements.
GERALD BRENNAN
Gerald was not present to give testimony.
THOMAS MARSON
Joe Ryan presented a request to place a driveway less than f ive
hundred (500) feet along STH 35. There should be access along the
town road but so as to not interrupt the efficiency of the farming
of the property they are requesting this access.
Upon completion of the hearing the Board of Adjustment visited each
site in question after which they entered in closed session to
render the following decisions:
MARC PUTMAN/DR. JOHN FOKER
Prior to the hearing, Marc Putman requested that their hearing be
delayed until the next month so as to receive DNR recommendations.
LAVERNE & ROSELLA KATTRE
Motion by Stephens seconded by Bradley to conditionally approve the
duplex use providing the lower bedroom has a safe egress window and
smoke detectors are installed on both levels. Motion carried.
-WILIW & MWAK BRISKIB
Motion by Menter seconded by Kinney to conditionally approve the
expansion of the grinding shop. All commercial building codes must
4 '
be met as well as permits for septic system and EPA hazardous
material storage. Setback variances to granted providing addition
is no closer to the road than the existing structure.
THOMAS MARSON
Motion by Neuman seconded by Bradley to deny the request for the
driveway separation of less than five hundred (500) feet. No
hardship could be shown.
Roll call vote: Kinney, no; Menter, yes; Stephens, yes; Neuman,
yes; Bradley, yes. Motion carried 4:1.
Respectively submitted:
iie—orggfMenter, secre a rvy
TCN:cj
C o -0 °o
3
M �
6o
�
h tl O
C
N
CT 3 C C o
N L
O
CIA n
CU .
(6
U dN I
<0
N
'L-' L Q-O C
� O
O 3�-.'O Co
O Cl.n O U
O c C O N
y L O O m
C) C N N 0)
Y co
oa.0m
LOa >,Z >
to
w
CD od'c E c�Q�
o � o
O co
_ rn
c z N C c m `
LL C T O cL U O E
O �� c= X�
O Ln ,C m x E
o a Eon Ea
O
I
N p O p N
E Q O S m m N o
@ O
� � I
r I'. Q• N
Z d
CL m
N
I
o z d
E i
Y N
F C C
O _ O
O
•� rn -c m N
O Q Q
N
Q m m Z Z o Z o
N a I ,
a w
NN d
o a a >
N r-
m o o a
N >° lO °-
• ;� aoO. a
O N o co m N
O O) }
CD
> Cl) O
Q o o E 0
CO _ d `0
C o 3 +°
C � N 3 N N C
O Q O CO E O O
O O F-
C N > O N c
L O Q N M C N 0)
E O 75 M O 00 L Z �
c (3)i F-a aD
v W
•O y O N U) CO - 0 Z N H W
LtS
a
3 dt L a
• as a m t m y c
`N Cd E L o
A ciao ! oin (0)
Parcel #: 034-1087-20-075 12/29/2010 10:11 AM
PAGE 1 OF 1
Alt. Parcel M 28.29.15.565A-20 034-TOWN OF SPRINGFIELD
Current ❑ ST. CROIX COUNTY,WISCONSIN
Creation Date Historical Date Map# Sales Area Application# Permit# Permit Type #of Units
00 0
Tax Address: Owner(s): O=Current Owner, C=Current Co-Owner
WALTER J& DEBORAH A BRISKIE O-BRISKIE,WALTER J & DEBORAH A
2911 72ND AVE
WILSON WI 54027
Districts: SC=School SP=Special Property Address(es): `=Primary
Type Dist# Description 2911 72ND AVE
SC 2198 SCH DIST GLENWOOD CITY
SP 1700 WITC
SP 7070 SPRINGFIELD SAN DIST#1
Legal Description: Acres: 0.250 Plat: 4626-CSM 17-4626 034-2003
SEC 28 T29N R15W PT SW SW CSM 17-4626 Block/Condo Bldg: LOT 02
LOT 2 (.25 AC)
Tract(s): (Sec-Twn-Rng 401/4 1601/4)
28-29N-15W SW SW
Notes: Parcel History:
Date Doc# Vol/Page Type
10/02/2003 742297 2426/611 QC
10/02/2003 742295 17/4626 CSM
2010 SUMMARY Bill M Fair Market Value: Assessed with:
58369 13,400
Valuations: Last Changed: 08/31/2009
Description Class Acres Land Improve Total State Reason
RESIDENTIAL G1 0.250 2,500 13,000 15,500 NO
Totals for 2010:
General Property 0.250 2,500 13,000 15,500
Woodland 0.000 0 0
Totals for 2009:
General Property 0.250 2,500 13,000 15,500
Woodland 0.000 0 0
Lottery Credit: Claim Count: 0 Certification Date: Batch M
Specials:
User Special Code Category Amount
Special Assessments Special Charges Delinquent Charges
Total 0.00 0.00 0.00
Parcel #: 016-1045-90-000 12/29/2010 10:10 AM
PAGE 1 OF 2
Alt. Parcel#: 20.30.15.331A 016-TOWN OF GLENWOOD
Current ❑X ST. CROIX COUNTY,WISCONSIN
Creation Date Historical Date Map# Sales Area Application# Permit# Permit Type #of Units
00 0
Tax Address: Owner(s): O=Current Owner, C=Current Co-Owner
SUSAN Y VAN DOORN 0-VAN DOORN, SUSAN Y
1422 290TH ST
GLENWOOD CITY WI 54013
Districts: SC=School SP=Special Property Address(es): '=Primary
Type Dist# Description '1422 290TH ST
SC 2198 SCH DIST GLENWOOD CITY
SP 1700 WITC
Legal Description: Acres: 20.000 Plat: N/A-NOT AVAILABLE
SEC 20 T30N R1 5W E 1/2 OF SE SE Block/Condo Bldg:
Tract(s): (Sec-Twn-Rng 401/4 1601/4)
20-30N-15W SE SE
Notes: Parcel History:
Date Doc# Vol/Page Type
12/14/2009 908369 WD
01/30/2009 887691 SD
09/21/2001 657161 1722/551 WD
04/10/1992 481784 944/457 WD
more...
2010 SUMMARY Bill#: Fair Market Value: Assessed with:
72733 Use Value Assessment
Valuations: Last Changed: 06/04/2010
Description Class Acres Land Improve Total State Reason
RESIDENTIAL G1 2.000 25,000 80,700 105,700 NO 10
AGRICULTURAL G4 14.000 1,400 0 1,400 NO 06
UNDEVELOPED G5 2.000 2,500 0 2,500 NO 08
AGRICULTURAL FOREST G5M 2.000 3,000 0 3,000 NO
Totals for 2010:
General Property 20.000 31,900 80,700 112,600
Woodland 0.000 0 0
Totals for 2009:
General Property 20.000 31,800 84,400 116,200
Woodland 0.000 0 0
Lottery Credit: Claim Count: 0 Certification Date: Batch#: 120
Specials:
User Special Code Category Amount
Special Assessments Special Charges Delinquent Charges
Total 0.00 0.00 0.00
1
54 G rF�• +Fq '
tv t
r nix 1
I
11A IOP Y HOA
9 •&; � N i Y
PF!J, I I i
K J,
S -9 .^
s
ire
IE
e.
too
/ .
r
a
+ ,Q
fiz�P'J � vim;".:. '1�� � �� � A, S� �' • i
9
T.
@1 ✓