HomeMy WebLinkAbout040-1318-00-001 � sE
Wisconsin Department of Commerce SOIL EVALUATION REPORT 3
Division of Safety and Buildings Page 1 of
in accordance with Comm 85,VUrs. Adm. Code
Attach complete site plan on County ST.CROIX
include,but not limited to:vertical and horizontal 81 inches�tee.Plan must
Pant(BM),direction and Parcel I.D. (pENl �i)
percent slope,sale or dimensions,north arrow,and location and distance to nearest road.
Please print all imbmadon. Y Date
Personal information you provide may be used for secondary purposes(Privacy Law,s.15.04(1)(m)). (//
Properly Owner GwY(4 e
Property Location
NORTH DAKOTA STATE UNIVERSITY c%Leo Be — '
skar Govt.Lot SE 1/4 NW 1/4 S I 1 T 28 N R 19 E�
Property Owner's Mailing Address Lot# Block# Subd.Name or CSM# .26 Ap)
Rodli,Beskar,Boles&Krueger SC,219 N.Main Street 1 — Hills of Tro
City State Zip Code Phone Number []City ❑Yt� own Nearest Road
River Falls, W1 1 54022 1 ( 715) 425-7281
Coulee Trail
E] New Corrstruction Uses Residential/Number of bedrooms 4 Code derived design flow rate 600 GPD
ReplamnW [] Pubic or commercial-Describe:
Parent material loess over till Flood Plain elevation if applicable
General comments N A ft
and recommendations: Mound System— 1.34&sand fill—0.2 loading rate_an..au E BPD
(If pre-treatment-0.34&mound sand—0-3 loadiw natal
Boring# ❑ Boring �oo ks rnvH- a- CUA
Q Pit Ground surface v.�Z.4� tL Depth to Ianifmg Eaton 24
Sal Rate
Horizon Depth Dominant Color Redox Texture Structure Consistence
in. MunseflrY Roots GPI
Qu.Sz_ Cori.Color Gr.Sz.Sh. 'Efr#1 'Eff#2
1 0-11 10YR2/2 — sil 3fa&sbk ds cs 3vf-co
0.6 0.8
2 11-24 l0YR3/6 — scl 3f-msbk deh cw 2vf-m 0.2 0.3
3 24 — — lsbr
Horizon 2 has some gr.
❑
26
] BodM# ��
' Pit Ground surface elev. 1072.ZD ft. Depth to limiting factor in.
Sal Application Rate
Horizon Depth Dominant Col Redox Description Texture Structure Consistence Boundary Roots GPDW
in. Mansell Qu.Sz. Cont Color Gr.Sz.Sh. '0101 'Eff#2
1 0-4 10YR2/2 — sil 3fa&sbk ds cs 3vf-m 0.6 0.8
2 414 10YR2l2 —
sil 3fabk ds as 2vf-m 0.6 0.8
3 1419 IOYR3/4 — sil 2vf-m 2fa&sbk dsh cs 0.6 0.8
4 19-26 10YR3/6 — scl 2fsbk m fi as 1 vf-f 0.2 0.3
5 26- — — lsbr
H orizons have some gr and few cobbles
'Effluent 1k1=BOD >30<220 mg&and TSS>30<150 mg& 'EflluaM#2=BOD <30 mglt.and TSS<30 mglL
CST Name(Please print) nature CST Number
M Jo Hollister 224832
Address Date Evaluation Conducted Telephone Number
W9875 690th Avenue, River Falls, W1 54022 (715)426-1775
r
NDSU(Lot 1) 2 3
Pro perty Owner Parcel ID# (Pending) Page of
QBoring# LJ Boring
Pit Ground surface elev. 107'6.75 ft. Depth to limiting factor 20 in. Sod ApOkation Rate
Horizon Depth Dominant Color Redox Description Texture Stricture Consistence Boundary Roots GPD/I?
in. Munsed Qu.Sz. Corti.Color Gr.Sz.Sh. *Eff#1 *Eff#2
1 0-4 10YR2/2 — sil 3fsbk ds cs 3vf-co 0.6 0.8
2 _443 10YR2/2 — Sil 3f-msbk ds as 2vf-co 0.6 0.8
3 12-20 10YR3/6 — scl 2f-ma&sbk mfi as 2vf-m 0.2 0.3
4 4 10YR3/4 fld 10YR5/6 scl Om mefi cs lvf-f 0.0 0.0
5 24 -- — lsbr — — — — — —
onzons 3&4 have some gr,few cobbles.
Boring# Boring
❑
F-1
Pit Ground surface elev. ft. Depth to limiting factor in. Sod Application Rate
Horizon Depth Dominant Color Redox Description Texture Structure Consistence Boundary Roots GPD/it=
in. Munsed Qu.Sz. Court.color Gr.Sz.Sh. "Eff#1 *Eff#2
F-1 Boring# Boring
Pit Ground surface elev. ft. Depth to limiting factor in.
Sod Application Rate
Horizon Depth Dominant Color Redox Description Texture Structure Consistence Boundary Roots GPD/if
in. Munsed Qu.Sz. Cont.Color Gr.Sz.Sh. *Eff#1 I *Eff#2
*Effluent#1=BODS>30<220 mg/-and TSS>30<150 mg/L *Effluent#2=BM,:5 30 mg/L and TSS<30 mg&
The Department of Commerce is an equal opportunity service provider and employer. If you need assistance to access services or
need material in an alternate format, please contact the department at 608-266-3151 or TTY 608-264-8777.
SBD-8330Te((R.07M)
Plot Plan for Sills of Troy Page 3 of
Town of Troy, & Crnix County, Wisconsin '
Lot I I"= 40 ft
Legal Descr[pdon se/4 of-jtiF id w°/y, SP-C-11, Z fz contours
I Z-19 0 ILi y 10, U w.K) v F TO y �=Backhoe pit
TOP' 1 1/4°
PPE
107241 -
-1$►
8-2A
\
MAM
OF 1 1/4..
ELEYA 1077.07
f
I �
I '
R-1A i
eL t •R3
-1c ! "
1075.75
\. 107 .ZD'
ST CROIX COUNTY
PLANNING & ZONING
January 19, 2006
Mr. Craig Lilja
c/o Troy Development
11806 Aberdeen Street, Suite 290'
Blaine, MN 55449
Code RE: Hills of Troy Soil Evaluation Reports Review
Administration SE/NW Section 11, T28N, R1 9W Town of Troy
715-386-4680
Land Information Dear Mr. Lilja:
Planning A I have completed a review of soil evaluation reports submitted to our office for Lots 1 —62
715-386-4 on the above-referenced development and find that additional information will be required
for 18 of the reports. The following summary provides specific data that will be necessary
Real perty before these reports can be used to design mound private on-site wastewater treatment
7 386-4677 systems (POWTS):
R ling Lot 1 —The soil application rate that must be used to calculate mound basal area (0.2
386-4675 gpd/ft2) requires a long, narrow mound with a linear loading rate of<4.5 gal./ft./day. The
existing tested area allows a maximum mound length of 90 feet, which is likely too short to
meet the linear loading rate requirement. In addition, the elevation reported for boring R-1A
is incorrect and must be re-measured to provide an accurate contour elevation for mound
design.
Lot 4—the entire original soil-tested area was covered during excavation and grading of the
building pad. From an on-site investigation made 1/17/06, 1 observed that a crescent-
shaped area of undisturbed soils remains between the toe of the filled building pad and the
20% slopes at the rear of the lot. According to Ms. Hollister, there is another boring (R-4E)
that was not included in her submittal, but is located in this undisturbed area. She needs to
submit an amended soil evaluation report that includes a profile description and shows the
location of this boring so that a contour can be established for a mound. In addition, both
benchmark elevations need to be checked and verified, since the elevations are 0.91' and
2.05' higher than the contour 1066' shown on the plot plan. The amended report must be
completed before a design can be created for a proposed POWTS. Please note, Ms.
Hollister is a CST, but not a POWTS designer, so plot plan and mound plan view
calculations she has prepared, indicating a location for a 33' x 124' mound, are only an
example of what might work after the soil data has been provided.
Lots 10 & 11 — I made a note regarding inconsistencies for BM @ 1077.15, which is shown
in different locations on each plot plan. I recommended using the alternate lot corner I. P.
benchmark @ 1075.10' to avoid errors in establishing mound contour elevations.
Lots 1, 6, 8, 9, 10, 11, 14 17, 1 J22 24, 25, 31, 32, 34, 40, 41, 45, 46 & 62 - On all the
above o , there are discrep ieseen the elevations
and test pit locations compared
to the contours shown on Ms. Hollister's site plans. In a telephone discussion with CST
ST.CRO/X COUNTY GOVERNMENT CENTER
PZPCO.SA/NT-CRO/X W/ 110 1 CARMICHAEL ROAD,HUDSON W/ 54016 715386,4686 F4x_
US
WWW.CO.SAWT
Page Tw i o roy poi epors � .:
Mary Jo ollister, I was informed that most of the elevations reported for soil test pits were provided by the
surveyor art of developing the preliminary plat. The individual soil report plot plans were created using
copies of th liminary plat to show 2' contour intervals on the lot and locations of Mary Jo's test pits.
When usin n Sea Level elevation (as opposed to an assumed elevation), the contours should be
consistent he elevations given for each test pit on the plot plan. Some of the discrepancies may be a
result of c largement and scale that are not 100% accurate. However, my concern are errors that
range from to more than 6 feet difference in elevation, which is unacceptable. All reports that have
discrepancie reater than 0.75' will be set aside and copies mailed to Mary Jo for re-calculation and/or
corrections b re the reports will be released for use in designing POWTS.
Our office, as a `governmental unit"for the state, is required by WI Comm 85.50 to complete soil report
reviews withi months of receipt; these reports were submitted on 10/25/05. Please feel free to contact
me if you a questions regarding the soil report review or status of individual lot reports.
Sinc y,
4
mela Quinn
Specialist
Cc: L e Filkins, Ogden Engineering
Jo Hollister, CST, Hollister Soil Testing
an Wert, Town of Troy Building Inspector
bdivision file
ST.CROIX COUNTY GOVERNMENT CENTER
1 101 CARMICHAEL ROAD,HUDSON, W/ 54016 715386-4686 FAX
PZPCO.SAINT-CROIX.W1.US W W W C O.SAINT-C ROMMIL US
I
I
Linear Loading Rates for Mounds
By Brad Johnson,Safety and Buildings Division Section
Chief,bjohnson @commerce.state.wi.us,920492-5605
I was recently afforded the opportunity to
review a number of mound plans and was requirement promotes the"long and narrow"
surprised to see the number of designs that didn't philosophy encouraged by many experts in the
correctly account for the linear loading rate field. Notice that the calculation is not dependant
restriction specified in all of the approved mound on the number of laterals in the dispersal cell or
component manuals. whether or not the laterals are center-fed or end-
fed. Increasing the number of laterals in a
Let me address why the requirement is in the dispersal cell does not change the linear loading
component manuals,where it is found,and how to rate.
properly meet it. N
The intent of this requirement is to provide for If the size of a lot prevents the installation of a
adequate assimilation and treatment of effluent longer mound,creating multiple dispersal cells I
and prevent mound toe leakage when a restrictive " will help meet this linear loading rate requirement,
soil horizon is present in the upper portion of a but the cells must be spaced much farther apart
soil profile near the sand fill/in situ soil inter ce than the minimum three feet specified in the
of the system. In table 1 of each component tables, in order to provide enough room for the
manual,a linear loading rate restriction of< .5 effluent to move through the restrictive soil
gallons/foot/day is required for systems whe in horizon before reaching the perimeter of the ne
situ soil having a soil application rate of<0.3 /sf/ dispersal cell.
d occurs within 12 inches of fill material The
linear loading rate(LLR)is calculated by dividing ��" requirement can be
the design wastewater flow(DWF)by the length directed to any of the S&B POWTS program staff,
of the dispersal cell(B): DWFB=LLR. This see page I 1 of this WCCR.
Wieser Concrete 2006 Septic Training Seminars
: March 2, 2006, Wieser Concrete •
• . education •
Products, Maiden Rock, Wisconsin
for_ _ _
March 9, 2006, Shell Lake Community •
: Center, Shell Lake, Wisconsin ;
• March 22, 2006, Wieser Concrete All sessions 8:30 a.m. to
: Products, Fond du Lac, Wisconsin 3:30 p.m. - Fee $10,
• Includes Lunch! - For pre-
= March 23, 2006, Wieser Concrete registration contact
Products, Portage, Wisconsin Kathleen 800-641-5937
• http://www.wieserconcrete.com/index.htmi
.. .. ...... .... .... ... . .. .. . .. . ... . . . . .. . . .. . .... . .... ... . .. . . ..
Wisconsin Constriction Codes Report, 6 Safety and Buildings Division,Wisconsin Department of Commerce
February 2005
Wisconsin Department of Commerce SOIL EVALUATION REPORT Page 1 of 3
Division of Safety and Buildings
in accordance with Comm 85,Wis. Adm. Code
unty ST.CROIX
Attach complete site plan on paper no s th 1/2 11 i in 1R' ^� ��
include,but not limited to:vertical and o z (BM),direction an roel I p (PENDING)
percent slope,scale or dimensions,north arrow,and location nd distance to nearest road.
Please print all information, l" ? r' �? vi ed.by Date
Personal information you provide may be used for secondary purpose (Privacy Law,s.15.04(1)(m)).
Property Owner Zo on
NORTH DAKOTA STATE UNIVERSITY c/o Leo es ar Govt.Lot ---- /4 NW 1/4 S 11 T 28 N R 19 E(or)W
Property Owner's Mailing Address Lot# Block# Subd.Name or CSM#
Rodli,Beskar,Boles&Krueger SC,219 N.Main Street 1 --- Hills of Troy
City State Zip Code Phone Number ity village ■ Town Nearest Road
River Falls, WI 54022 ( 715) 425-7281 Coulee Trail
0 New Construction Use Residential/Number of bedrooms 4 Code derived design flow rate 600 GPD
nReplacement 0 Public or commercial-Describe:
Parent material loess over till Flood Plain elevation if appli bl NA ff.
General comments
and recommendationl// Mound System-- 1.34 ft.sand fill 0.2�Iea&nrate
l94�' Q l0�l A
AF4 (Ifpre-treatment-0.34 8.mound sand--0.3 loading rate)
Boring# 11 Boring -khWi�— 07,;1—/D 7111 06-�1 nR%Gd//
Q Pit Ground surface a v. E ft. Depth to limiting factor 24 in.
Soil Application Rate
Horizon Depth Dominant Color Redox Des Texture Structure Consistence Boundary Roots GPD/ff
in. Munsell Qu.Sz. Cont.Color Gr.Sz.Sh. *Eff#1 *Eff#2
1 0-11 10YR2/2 sil 3fa&sbk ds cs 3vf-co 0.6 0.8
2 11-24 10YR3/6 - sc 3f-msbk deh cam, 2vf-m 0.2 0.3
3 24- -- Isbr
Horizon 2 has some gr.
B Boring# 0 Boring �v 26
0 Pit Ground surface 21eX 0,7Z..� {t. Depth to limiting factor in.
Soil Application Rate
Horizon Depth Dominant Color Redox De Texture Structure Consistence Boundary Roots GPD/fP
in. Munsell Qu.Sz. Cont.Color Gr.Sz.Sh. *Eff#1 *Eff#2
1 0-4 10YR2/2 - sil 3fa&sbk ds cs 3vf-m 0.6 0.8
2 4-14 10YR2/2 sil 3fabk I ds as 2vf-2vf-m
0.6 0.8
m
3 14-19 10YR3/4 sil 2fa&sbk dsh cs 0.6 0.8
4 19-26 IOYR3/6 scl 2fsbk mfi as lvf-f 0.2 0.3
5 26- -- Isbr
Onzons 3&4 have some gr and few cobbles.
i
*Effluent#1 =BODS>30:5 220 mg/L and TSS>30<150 mg/L *Effluent#2=BCD 5:5 30 mg/L and TSS<30 mg/L
CST Name (Please Print) ' nature CST Number
Ma Jo Hollister 'L 224832
Address ate Evaluation Conducted Telephone Number
W9875 690th Avenue, River Falls, WI 54022 07- 11 -05 (715)426-1775
NDSU(Lot 1) (Pending) 2 3
Property Owner Page f
p rty Parcel ID# g o
a Boring# ❑ Boring ''0
Pit Ground surface elev. 1076.7-4' ft. Depth to limiting factor in.
Soil Application Rate
Horizon Depth Dominant Color Redox Description Texture Structure Consistence Boundary Roots GPD/fg
in. Munsell Qu.Sz. Cont.Color Gr.Sz.Sh. *Eff#1 *Eff#2
1 04 10YR2/2 -- sil 3fsbk ds cs 3vf-co 0.6 0.8
2 4-12 10YR2/2 -- sil 3f-msbk ds as 2vf-co 0.6 0.8
3 - 10YR3/6 -- scl 2f-ma&sbk mfi as 2vf-m. 0.2 0.3
4 20-24 10YR3/4 f2d 10YR5/6 scl Om mefi cs lvf-f 0.0 0.0
5 24- -- - lsbr
Horizons 3&4 have some gr,few cobbles.
F-1 Boring Boring
El# U
Pit Ground surface elev. ft. Depth to limiting factor in. Soil Application Rate
Horizon Depth Dominant Color Redox Description Texture Structure Consistence Boundary Roots GPD/fft
in. Munsell Qu.Sz. Cont.Color Gr.Sz.Sh. *Eff#1 *Eff#2
E]
Boring
F-1 Boring# Pit Ground surface elev. ft. Depth to limiting factor in.
Soil Application Rate
Horizon Depth Dominant Color Redox Description Texture Structure Consistence Boundary Roots GPD/ft
in. Munsell Qu.Sz. Cont.Color Gr.Sz.Sh. *Eff#1 *Eff#2
*Effluent#1 =BODS>30<220 mg/L and TSS>30<150 mg/L *Effluent#2=BOD,<30 mg/L and TSS<30 mg/L
The Department of Commerce is an equal opportunity service provider and employer. If you need assistance to access services or
need material in an alternate format, please contact the department at 608-266-3151 or TTY 608-264-8777.
SBD-8330Test(R.07/00)
Plot Plan for dills o.f Troy Page 3 of 3
Town of Troy, St. Croix County, Wisconsin
Lot I I" = 40ft.
Legal Description /� cF-r�� N w /�, .S�c. 2 ft. contours
I Z91 d R-.\q w) TO OF TROY 0_ Backhoe pit
• e
e •
i
e
TOP' 1 1/4" O
PPE
T101da 1072.41 0
B-2A i
MARK:
j67G2 _ OF 1 1/4"
ELEVAT 1077.07
/
R-
C
1c
E�
7-5
_ f