HomeMy WebLinkAbout040-1318-00-010 CTIVED
Wisconsin Departme it of commerce L EVALUATION REPORT Page 1 of 3
Division of Safety an Buildings i k
in accordan wit r Adm ? de
County ST.CROIX
Attach complete si lartah p;tperf)(of C�Stfhh 8 1/ x 1 i-inoLtBS ize.Plan must
P p
include,but not li ted to: tal refs nce point(BM), ire Parcel I.D. /�
percent slope,sca cation and distance to nearest road.
Please print all information. �'/yp-viewe y r D7-7 l/-
Personal information you provide may be used for secondary purposes(Privacy Law,s.15.04(1)(m)). t v X�
Property Owner Properly Location ■
NORTH DAKOTA STATE UNIVERSITY c/o Leo Beskar Govt.Lot ----NE 1/4 NW 1/4 S 11 T 28 N R 19 E(or)W
Property Owner's Mailing Address Lot# Block# Subd.Name or CSM#
Rodli,Beskar,Boles&Krueger SC,2.19 N.Main Street 10 --- Hills of Troy
City State Zip Code Phone Number ity village ■ Town Nearest Road
River Falls, WI 1 54022 ( 715) 425-7281 Coulee Trail
QNew Construction Usein Residential/Number of bedrooms 4 Code derived design flow rate 600 GPD
n Replacement E] Public or commercial-Describe:
Parent material loess over till Flood Plain elevation if applicable T nom_ft
General comments Mound System-- 1.34 ft.sand fill--0.4c loading rate
and recommendations:via-"
(?M �'a 75 p (If re-treatment system--below ground drip irrigation--0.61oading �te)
A❑ Boring# u Boring
Q Pit Ground surface elev. 1076.06 ft. Depth to limiting factor 30 in.
'Soil Application Rate
Horizon Depth Dominant Color Redox Description Texture Structure Consistence Boundary Roots GPD/ff
in. Munsell Qu.Sz. Cont.Color Gr.Sz.Sh. *Eff#1 *Eff#2
1 0-17 10YR3/2 - sil 2f-ma&sbk mvfr as 2vf-m 0.6 0.8
2 17-26 10YR4/3 — sil 2fabk mfr ate, lvf-f 0.6 0.8
3 26-30
10YR4/3 - sil Ifabk mfr cw lvf-f 0.4c 0.6
4 30- -- till/lsbr -- -- -- --
Ffl Boring# Boring 1077.58 32
■ pit Ground surface elev. ft. Depth to limiting factor in. Soil Application Rate
Horizon Depth Dominant Color Redox Description Texture Structure Consistence Boundary Roots GPD/fF
in. Munsell Qu.Sz. Cont.Color Gr.Sz.Sh. *Eff#1 *Eff#2
1 0-10 10YR3/2 — sil 3fa&sbk mvfr as 2vf-m 0.6 0.8
2 10-24 10YR3/4 - sil 3fabk mfr cs lvf-m 0.6 0.8
3 24-32 10YR3/4 is lmsbk mfr cs lvf-f 0.4 0.7
4 32- till/lsbr -" -- -- --
Horizons 2&3 have some gr.
Effluent#1=BOD >30:<220 mg/L and TSS>30<150 mg/L *Effluent#2=BOD5<30 mg/L and TSS<30 mg/L
CST Name (Please Print) gnature CST Number
Ma Jo Hollister 224832
Address Date Evaluation Conducted Telephone Number
W9875 690th Avenue, River Falls, WI 54022 05-05,06-02&09- 17-05 (715)426-1775
Properly Owner NDSU(Lot 10) Parcel ID# (Pending) Page 2 of 3
�
FC] Boring it Boring Q 1078.00 31 Pit Ground surface elev. ft. Depth to limiting factor in.
Soil Applicati on Rate
Horizon Depth Dominant Color Redox Description Texture Structure Consistence Boundary Roots GPD/fF
An. Munsell Qu.Sz. Cont.Color Gr.Sz.Sh. "Eff#1 'Eff#2
1 0-3 l0YR3/2 -- sil 3f-mgr mvfr cb 3vf-m 0.6 0.8
2 3_1 10YR3/2 A 2f-ma&sbk mfr as 2vf-m 0.6 0.8
3 10-13 10 /3 -- sil lmpl mfr cw 2vf-f 0.4c 0.6
4 13-18 IOYR3/4 -- A 2fabk mfr cs lvf-m 0.6 0.8
5 18-31 7.5YR4/4 -- sl lcsbk mfr as lvf-f 0.4 0.7
6 31-33 j 7.5YR4/4 c2d 7.5YR4/6 sl Om mfr -- -- 0.2 0.6
D Boring# 0 Boring 20
Ground surface elev. i 075 t S ft. Depth to limiting factor in.
Pit p Soil—Application Rate
Horizon Depth Dominant Color Redox Description Texture Structure Consistence Boundary Roots GPD/fF
in. Munsell Qu.Sz. Cont.Color Gr.Sz.Sh. `Eff#1 "Eff#2
1 0_9 10YR3/2 -- sil 3fgr&abk mvfr as 3vf-co 0.6 0.8
2 9-20 4/3 __ cl 3fa&sbk mfi as 2vf-co 0.4 0.6
1
3 20-30 -- - tilUlsbr -- --
F-1 Boring# �Boring
Ground surface elev. ft. Depth to limiting factor in.
Pit Soil lication Rate
Horizon Depth Dominant Color Redox Description Texture Structure Consistence Boundary Roots GPD/fF
in. Munsell Qu.Sz. Cont.Color Gr.Sz.Sh. 'Eff#1 `Eff#2
"Effluent#1 =BODS>30<220 mg/L and TSS>30:<150 mg/L *Effluent#2=BODS<30 mg/L and TSS<30 mg/L
The Department of Commerce is an equal opportunity service provider and employer. If you need assistance to access services or
need material in an alternate format,please contact the department at 608-266-3151 or TTY 608-264-8777.
SBD-8330Test(R,07/00)
Plot Plan for Hills of Troy Page 3 of 3
Town of Troy, St Croix County, Wisconsin
Lot to 1199 = 40 ft.
Legal Description or THE NW 3/� ��Z�;�, 2 ft contours
Backhoe pit
jT�
10 I
a
I
D
I A -_
VS IA r�
itiv
I � g
B-9A
Q) .
CROIX COUNTY
PLANNING
Wh;H?�L,fiG',:l.f'2 .ei' 4:,^)JA%£; Yfm.':-... .s::i;'u v/.=..'zaiw'.s ': //Sl..v ti d. '1,ak�.N<6 ;•:=. A" ;ta:. "`E;'. bi',.
January 19, 2006
Mr. Craig Lilja
c/o Troy Development
11806 Aberdeen Street, Suite 290'
Blaine, MN 55449
RE: Hills of Troy Soil Evaluation Reports Review
Code
Administration SE/NW Section 11, T28N, R1 9W Town of Troy
715-386-4680
Land Information Dear Mr. Lilja:
Planning I have completed a review of soil evaluation reports submitted to our office for Lots 1 —62
715-386-4 0 on the above-referenced development and find that additional information will be required
for 18 of the reports. The following summary provides specific data that will be necessary
Real perty before these reports can be used to design mound private on-site wastewater treatment
7 386-4677 systems (POWTS):
R cling Lot 1 —The soil application rate that must be used to calculate mound basal area (0.2
386-4675 gpd/ft2) requires a long, narrow mound with a linear loading rate of<4.5 gal./ft./day. The
existing tested area allows a maximum mound length of 90 feet, which is likely too short to
meet the linear loading rate requirement. In addition, the elevation reported for boring R-1A
is incorrect and must be re-measured to provide an accurate contour elevation for mound
design.
Lot 4—the entire original soil-tested area was covered during excavation and grading of the
building pad. From an on-site investigation made 1/17/06, 1 observed that a crescent-
shaped area of undisturbed soils remains between the toe of the filled building pad and the
20% slopes at the rear of the lot. According to Ms. Hollister, there is another boring (R-4E)
that was not included in her submittal, but is located in this undisturbed area. She needs to
submit an amended soil evaluation report that includes a profile description and shows the
location of this boring so that a contour can be established for a mound. In addition, both
benchmark elevations need to be checked and verified, since the elevations are 0.91' and
2.05' higher than the contour 1066' shown on the plot plan. The amended report must be
completed before a design can be created for a proposed POWTS. Please note, Ms.
Hollister is a CST, but not a POWTS designer, so plot plan and mound plan view
calculations she has prepared, indicating a location for a 33' x 124' mound, are only an
example of what might work after the soil data has been provided.
Lots 10 & 11 — I made a note regarding inconsistencies for BM @ 1077.15, which is shown
in different locations on each plot plan. I recommended using the alternate lot corner I. P.
benchmark @ 1075.10' to avoid errors in establishing mound contour elevations.
Lots 1, ,I,9l10, 11, 14 17, 1 J22 24, 25, 31, 32, 34, 40, 41, 45, 46 &62 - On all the
above l�here are discre ieseen the elevations and test est pit locations compared
to the contours shown on Ms. Hollister's site plans. In a telephone discussion with CST
ST.CRO/X COUNTY GOVERNMENT CENTER
1 101 CARMiCHAEC ROAD,HUDSON, W/ 54016 715386-4686 Fgx-
PZ @CO.SA/NT CRO/X.W1.US W W W. O.SAI NT
Page Tw i o roy" of epos
Mary Jo ollister, I was informed that most of the elevations reported for soil test pits were provided by the
surveyor art of developing the preliminary plat. The individual soil report plot plans were created using
copies of th liminary plat to show 2' contour intervals on the lot and locations of Mary Jo's test pits.
When usin n Sea Level elevation (as opposed to an assumed elevation), the contours should be
consistent he elevations given for each test pit on the plot plan. Some of the discrepancies may be a
result of c largement and scale that are not 100% accurate. However, my concern are errors that
range from to more than 6 feet difference in elevation, which is unacceptable. All reports that have
discrepancie reater than 0.75' will be set aside and copies mailed to Mary Jo for re-calculation and/or
corrections b re the reports will be released for use in designing POWTS.
Our office, as a `governmental unit"for the state, is required by WI Comm 85.50 to complete soil report
reviews withi months of receipt; these reports were submitted on 10/25/05. Please feel free to contact
me if you a questions regarding the soil report review or status of individual lot reports.
Sinc y,
mela Quinn
g Specialist
Cc: L 'e Filkins, Ogden Engineering
Jo Hollister, CST, Hollister Soil Testing
an Wert, Town of Troy Building Inspector
bdivision file
I
I
I
ST.CROIX COUNTY GOVERNMENT CENTER
1 101 CARMICHAEL ROAD,HUDSON, W1 54016 715386,4686 FAX
E OCO.SA/NT-CROIX.W1.US WWW.CO SAINTCROIX WI US